22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S4 - P - 04<br />

AUTOMATION OF A CAPTURE PROBE MAGNETIC BEAD DNA EXTRACTION METHOD FOR 3 GRAM<br />

FAECAL SAMPLES FROM RED FOX INTENDED FOR PCR-DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS<br />

MULTILOCULARIS<br />

Isaksson, M 1 , Hagström, Å 1 , Lukacs, M 2 , Holmberg, A 3 , Juremalm, M 1<br />

1<br />

National Veterinary Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden<br />

2<br />

Nordiag ASA, Research and development, Oslo, Norway<br />

3<br />

Nordiag AB, Research and development, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

Automation, capture probe, DNA extraction, faecal samples, Echinococcus multilocularis<br />

Introduction<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the Echinococcus multilocularis (EM) surveillance in<br />

Sweden, 4000 red fox faecal samples will be collected and<br />

analyzed by PCR. This necessitates an automated DNA<br />

extraction method. Due to the heterogeneous presence <strong>of</strong> EMeggs<br />

in faeces, 3 grams <strong>of</strong> sample material is needed for the<br />

DNA extraction <strong>of</strong> this analysis. Earlier findings show that a<br />

capture probe magnetic bead extraction method (1) increases<br />

sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay compared to the standard egg-flotation<br />

and DNA extraction previously used at the National Veterinary<br />

Institute in Sweden (not published). In this study, we show how<br />

automation <strong>of</strong> the manual capture probe magnetic bead DNA<br />

extraction method capable <strong>of</strong> handling 3 grams <strong>of</strong> faeces per<br />

sample can increase the sample throughput capacity compared<br />

to manual extraction.<br />

Materials & methods<br />

The robot used in this study is a Nordiag Bullet (Nordiag ASA). It<br />

is a flexible robot for microplate format and includes a gripper for<br />

plate transfers, a splittable 1ml eight channel pipette head,<br />

magnetic separation station, bar code capability and external<br />

waste. To be able to automate the large sample volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three grams <strong>of</strong> faeces in lysis buffer, 10ml 24-well deepwell<br />

plates were used together with two high power magnet stations.<br />

Results<br />

Essentially the automation consists <strong>of</strong> the five wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />

magnetic beads and the magnetic pelleting between washes,<br />

eliminating the need to manually pipette the wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />

samples. The robot can be loaded with up to 48 individual<br />

samples consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 grams <strong>of</strong> homogenized fox faeces in<br />

buffer with biotinylated hybridization probes hybridized to the<br />

target and attached to streptavidin coated magnetic beads. When<br />

the robot is finished, the target DNA is melted <strong>of</strong>f the probes and<br />

the probe/magnetic bead pellet is discarded. The manual capture<br />

probe magnetic bead DNA extraction method allows a laboratory<br />

technician to finish 12-20 samples in one day. The automation<br />

allows the same technician to finish 48 samples in one day, with<br />

time to do other things while the robot is working. 96 samples in<br />

one long day are also possible, but in this case with more or less<br />

100% hands on time, preparing the next batch <strong>of</strong> samples while<br />

the robot is processing the first batch.<br />

Tab 1. Throughput <strong>of</strong> samples per week per technician, time for<br />

weighing and division <strong>of</strong> samples not included.<br />

Samples per<br />

week per<br />

technician<br />

Manual extraction<br />

Automated extraction<br />

100 336<br />

Fig 1. The Nordiag Bullet robot used in the study<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

The preparation <strong>of</strong> faecal samples before extraction, manual or<br />

automated, is difficult to automate. The samples have to be<br />

divided and put in the correct format tube or well before the<br />

extraction method itself can be initiated. Automating the washing<br />

steps <strong>of</strong> this method means that the sample throughput is<br />

increased enough for the hybridization capture probe method to<br />

be implemented as a routine, large scale DNA extraction method<br />

for the PCR detection <strong>of</strong> EM eggs in red fox faecal samples.<br />

Current work is aimed at modifying the automated capture probe<br />

DNA extraction method to be usable also for RNA targets in a<br />

standardized format, mixing RNA and DNA targets in the same<br />

robot run, or even in the same sample well. This would make the<br />

automated capture probe extraction method even more<br />

interesting for a number <strong>of</strong> difficult sample materials such as<br />

organ material, soil, sewage water etc.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This project is funded by the Swedish Civil Contingencies<br />

Agency.<br />

References<br />

1. Opsteegh, M, Langlelaar, M, Sprong, H, den Hartog, L, De Craeye, S,<br />

Bokken, G, Ajzenberg, D, Kijlstra, A, van der Giessen, J. 2010. Direct<br />

detection and genotyping <strong>of</strong> Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples using<br />

magnetic capture and PCR. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology,<br />

139(3), 193-201.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!