Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S4 - P - 04<br />
AUTOMATION OF A CAPTURE PROBE MAGNETIC BEAD DNA EXTRACTION METHOD FOR 3 GRAM<br />
FAECAL SAMPLES FROM RED FOX INTENDED FOR PCR-DETECTION OF ECHINOCOCCUS<br />
MULTILOCULARIS<br />
Isaksson, M 1 , Hagström, Å 1 , Lukacs, M 2 , Holmberg, A 3 , Juremalm, M 1<br />
1<br />
National Veterinary Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Virology, Immunobiology and Parasitology, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
2<br />
Nordiag ASA, Research and development, Oslo, Norway<br />
3<br />
Nordiag AB, Research and development, Stockholm, Sweden<br />
Automation, capture probe, DNA extraction, faecal samples, Echinococcus multilocularis<br />
Introduction<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the Echinococcus multilocularis (EM) surveillance in<br />
Sweden, 4000 red fox faecal samples will be collected and<br />
analyzed by PCR. This necessitates an automated DNA<br />
extraction method. Due to the heterogeneous presence <strong>of</strong> EMeggs<br />
in faeces, 3 grams <strong>of</strong> sample material is needed for the<br />
DNA extraction <strong>of</strong> this analysis. Earlier findings show that a<br />
capture probe magnetic bead extraction method (1) increases<br />
sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the assay compared to the standard egg-flotation<br />
and DNA extraction previously used at the National Veterinary<br />
Institute in Sweden (not published). In this study, we show how<br />
automation <strong>of</strong> the manual capture probe magnetic bead DNA<br />
extraction method capable <strong>of</strong> handling 3 grams <strong>of</strong> faeces per<br />
sample can increase the sample throughput capacity compared<br />
to manual extraction.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
The robot used in this study is a Nordiag Bullet (Nordiag ASA). It<br />
is a flexible robot for microplate format and includes a gripper for<br />
plate transfers, a splittable 1ml eight channel pipette head,<br />
magnetic separation station, bar code capability and external<br />
waste. To be able to automate the large sample volume <strong>of</strong> the<br />
three grams <strong>of</strong> faeces in lysis buffer, 10ml 24-well deepwell<br />
plates were used together with two high power magnet stations.<br />
Results<br />
Essentially the automation consists <strong>of</strong> the five wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
magnetic beads and the magnetic pelleting between washes,<br />
eliminating the need to manually pipette the wash steps <strong>of</strong> the<br />
samples. The robot can be loaded with up to 48 individual<br />
samples consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 grams <strong>of</strong> homogenized fox faeces in<br />
buffer with biotinylated hybridization probes hybridized to the<br />
target and attached to streptavidin coated magnetic beads. When<br />
the robot is finished, the target DNA is melted <strong>of</strong>f the probes and<br />
the probe/magnetic bead pellet is discarded. The manual capture<br />
probe magnetic bead DNA extraction method allows a laboratory<br />
technician to finish 12-20 samples in one day. The automation<br />
allows the same technician to finish 48 samples in one day, with<br />
time to do other things while the robot is working. 96 samples in<br />
one long day are also possible, but in this case with more or less<br />
100% hands on time, preparing the next batch <strong>of</strong> samples while<br />
the robot is processing the first batch.<br />
Tab 1. Throughput <strong>of</strong> samples per week per technician, time for<br />
weighing and division <strong>of</strong> samples not included.<br />
Samples per<br />
week per<br />
technician<br />
Manual extraction<br />
Automated extraction<br />
100 336<br />
Fig 1. The Nordiag Bullet robot used in the study<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
The preparation <strong>of</strong> faecal samples before extraction, manual or<br />
automated, is difficult to automate. The samples have to be<br />
divided and put in the correct format tube or well before the<br />
extraction method itself can be initiated. Automating the washing<br />
steps <strong>of</strong> this method means that the sample throughput is<br />
increased enough for the hybridization capture probe method to<br />
be implemented as a routine, large scale DNA extraction method<br />
for the PCR detection <strong>of</strong> EM eggs in red fox faecal samples.<br />
Current work is aimed at modifying the automated capture probe<br />
DNA extraction method to be usable also for RNA targets in a<br />
standardized format, mixing RNA and DNA targets in the same<br />
robot run, or even in the same sample well. This would make the<br />
automated capture probe extraction method even more<br />
interesting for a number <strong>of</strong> difficult sample materials such as<br />
organ material, soil, sewage water etc.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This project is funded by the Swedish Civil Contingencies<br />
Agency.<br />
References<br />
1. Opsteegh, M, Langlelaar, M, Sprong, H, den Hartog, L, De Craeye, S,<br />
Bokken, G, Ajzenberg, D, Kijlstra, A, van der Giessen, J. 2010. Direct<br />
detection and genotyping <strong>of</strong> Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples using<br />
magnetic capture and PCR. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Food Microbiology,<br />
139(3), 193-201.