22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S1 - P - 15<br />

ACCURACY OF PARATUBERCULOSIS ANTIBODY ELISA AT PREDICTING FECAL SHEDDING OF<br />

MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP PARATUBERCULOSIS IN CATTLE<br />

Rakel T. Fernández 1 , Carmen Eiras 2 , Carmen Calvo 2 , Ignacio Arnaiz 2 , Fco. Javier Diéguez 1,3<br />

1<br />

Santiago de Compostela University (Veterinary Faculty), Department <strong>of</strong> Anatomy and Animal Production, Lugo, Spain<br />

2<br />

Animal Health and Production Laboratory, Lugo, Spain<br />

3<br />

Santiago de Compostela University (Veterinary Faculty), Institute <strong>of</strong> Food Analysis and Research, Lugo, Spain<br />

Paratuberculosis, bovine, ELISA, fecal culture<br />

Introduction<br />

Paratuberculosis, also called Johne's disease, is chronic<br />

granulomatous enteritis caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp.<br />

paratuberculosis (MAP). This infectious disease has a worldwide<br />

distribution affecting mainly ruminants, both domestic and wild,<br />

but has also been isolated from other animal species. It causes<br />

great economic losses in cattle farming 1 .<br />

ELISA is an essential tool in paratuberculosis control programs,<br />

although bacterial culture remains the reference confirmatory<br />

test. In this line, the aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> the ELISA test as a predictor <strong>of</strong> the MAP fecal<br />

elimination "status" (determined by means <strong>of</strong> fecal culture) <strong>of</strong><br />

individual animals.<br />

Materials & methods<br />

The study was carried out in Galicia (north-west Spain). Galicia is<br />

the major cattle-farming region <strong>of</strong> Spain. It was responsible for<br />

35% <strong>of</strong> the milk and 12% <strong>of</strong> the beef produced in Spain,<br />

constituting approximately 1.7% <strong>of</strong> the milk and 1.3% <strong>of</strong> the beef<br />

produced in the European Union.<br />

Bacteriological culture was performed in fecal samples from 239<br />

animals that were collected during the period 2007-2010. 181<br />

animals were negative to fecal culture and 58 were culture<br />

positive animals. Serological analysis (ELISA) was also<br />

performed in serum samples from the same animals.<br />

Bacterial culture was performed as described by the World<br />

Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2008) 2 . Briefly, 1 g <strong>of</strong> feces<br />

was added to 20 mL <strong>of</strong> sterile distilled water, and tubes were<br />

shaken for 30 min and then allowed to stand undisturbed for 30<br />

min. Five millilitres <strong>of</strong> the supernatant were added to 0.75%<br />

hexadecylpyridinium chloride (HPC) (Sigma). Tubes were<br />

inverted several times and allowed to stand undisturbed for 18 h<br />

at room temperature for decontamination. Triplicate Herrold’s egg<br />

yolk medium (HEYM) culture slopes containing amphotericin B,<br />

vancomycin and nalidixic acid were inoculated with 0.1 mL <strong>of</strong> the<br />

undisturbed sediment, incubated at 37º C and observed at 2-<br />

week intervals for 16 weeks. Suspect colonies were evaluated for<br />

mycobactin dependence along with morphology and acid-fast<br />

staining. Positive-staining colonies were confirmed by PCR. For<br />

every nine fecal samples a positive control (a positive field<br />

sample) was included.<br />

The ELISA used was “PARATUBERCULOSIS ANTIBODY<br />

SCREENING” (Institute Pourquier, France). False-positive results<br />

were reduced by pre-absorbing the samples with sonicates <strong>of</strong> the<br />

environmental mycobacterium Mycobacterium phlei. Samples<br />

were considered positive at a % sample:positive ratio <strong>of</strong> 55% or<br />

more.<br />

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) procedure was used to<br />

evaluate the overall diagnostic accuracy to estimate the antibody<br />

titer that was the best cut-<strong>of</strong>f point in terms <strong>of</strong> sensitivity and<br />

specificity as a predictor <strong>of</strong> the bacteriological "status" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animals (culture positive/negative).<br />

Results<br />

The ROC curve -as measure <strong>of</strong> the accuracy <strong>of</strong> ELISA antibody<br />

titers to predict the bacteriological “status”- indicated a good<br />

diagnostic discrimination (Figure 1). The area under the curve<br />

was 0.878. The best overall diagnostic precision was in the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />

point 155.7 with sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 84.5% and specificity <strong>of</strong> 78.9%<br />

(Table 1).<br />

Figure 1: ROC curve for overall accuracy <strong>of</strong> antibody titers as a<br />

predictor <strong>of</strong> MAP bacteriological “status”<br />

Table 1: Sensitivities and specificities obtained from ROC<br />

procedure<br />

Cut <strong>of</strong>f point Sensitivity 1-Specificity<br />

71.4 1.00 0.81<br />

133.1 0.91 0.34<br />

147.2 0.88 0.26<br />

155.7 0.84 0.22<br />

160.1 0.83 0.20<br />

164.2 0.81 0.18<br />

167.7 0.78 0.17<br />

309.2 0.00 0.01<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

Traditionally the interpretation <strong>of</strong> ELISA is dichotomous (positive<br />

or negative) based on the cut-<strong>of</strong>f designed to optimize the<br />

sensitivity and specificity to detect animals with antibodies. The<br />

use <strong>of</strong> antibody titers on a continuous scale can improve the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> diagnostic information obtained by this technique. The<br />

ELISA evaluated in this study, as is the case <strong>of</strong> previous studies<br />

with different ELISAs 3 could allow a more accurate estimate <strong>of</strong><br />

the situation <strong>of</strong> the animal, in this case related to the<br />

bacteriological “status”.<br />

References<br />

1. Kennedy, DJ, Benedictus, G (2001). Control <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium avium<br />

subsp. paratuberculosis infection in agricultural species. Scientific and<br />

Technical Reviews, 20, 151-79.<br />

2. World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) (2008). Manual <strong>of</strong> diagnostic<br />

test & vaccines for terrestrial animals, Chapter 2.1.11.<br />

3. Collins, MT (2002). Interpretation <strong>of</strong> a commercial bovine<br />

paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood<br />

ratios. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 9, 1367-71.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!