Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
S3 - P - 26<br />
DETECTION OF EQUINE FOAMY VIRUS INFECTIONS IN HORSES<br />
Magdalena Materniak, Jacek Kuzmak<br />
National Veterinary Research Institute, Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry, Pulawy, Poland<br />
Equine foamy virus, diagnostics, PCR, ELISA<br />
Introduction<br />
Foamy viruses (FVs) are the least known complex retroviruses.<br />
FVs infections are highly prevalent among several animal species<br />
including non-human primates (chimpanzees, gorillas, etc.), cats<br />
and cattle. Another foamy virus was isolated from horses (Equine<br />
foamy virus - EFV) (1). Similarly to other FVs, EFV shows<br />
characteristic ultrastructure and susceptibility to infect large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cell lines. Furthermore, its molecular analysis exhibits<br />
genome organization typical for other known foamy viruses, but<br />
its sequence shows the highest similarity to bovine foamy virus.<br />
Although the first isolation <strong>of</strong> EFV was reported over ten years<br />
ago, still nothing is known about the prevalence <strong>of</strong> EFV infections<br />
in horses. Therefore we aimed to develop diagnostic tools and<br />
apply them to investigate the EFV infection in horses from<br />
Poland.<br />
References<br />
1. Tobaly-Tapiero J., Bittoun P., Neves M., Guillemin M.-C., Lecellier Ch.-<br />
H., Puvion-Dutilleul F., Gicquel B., Zientara S., Giron M.-L., The H. de,<br />
Saϊb A. (2000). Isolation and characterization <strong>of</strong> an eqiune foamy virus. J.<br />
Virol., 74, 4064-4073.<br />
2. Romen F., Backes P., Materniak M., Sting R., Vahlenkamp T. W., Riebe<br />
R., Pawlita M., Kuzmak J., Löchelt M. (2007). Serological detection<br />
systems for identification <strong>of</strong> cows shedding bovine foamy virus via milk.<br />
Virology, 364, 123-131.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Blood samples were collected from 175 horses (4 -18 years old),<br />
including common breeds, Hucul ponies and randomly selected<br />
samples from slaughtered horses. Semi-nested PCR was<br />
developed and applied to detect EFV DNA in DNA extracted from<br />
peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs). Selected primers flanked 275<br />
bp fragment within pol gene, the most conservative EFV region.<br />
GST ELISA with BFV specific Gag-GST fusion protein (2) was<br />
used for detection <strong>of</strong> foamy virus specific antibodies in horse<br />
serum samples. To confirm ELISA results immunoblotting with<br />
antigen prepared from Cf2Th/BFV 100 cells was applied.<br />
Additionally, attempts were made to isolate EFV from peripheral<br />
blood leukocytes <strong>of</strong> PCR positive animals by co-cultivation with<br />
BHK-21 and RK-13 cells.<br />
Results<br />
12.5% <strong>of</strong> samples were positive in semi-nested PCR. Specificity<br />
<strong>of</strong> amplified fragments was confirmed by sequencing and parwise<br />
identity <strong>of</strong> particular sequences ranged from 95.3% to 98.3%,<br />
when compared to EFV reference sequence (GenBank Acc. No.<br />
NC_002201). In contrast, almost 19% <strong>of</strong> the samples showed<br />
seroreactivity to BFV Gag protein. Most <strong>of</strong> PCR positive samples<br />
were detected in Hucul ponies, while only several in samples<br />
randomly collected from slaughtered animals. All attempts to<br />
isolate EFV from PBLs <strong>of</strong> PCR positive horses failed.<br />
Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> results.<br />
Origin<br />
PCR (+) ELISA (+)<br />
samples samples<br />
Hucul ponies 15 14 0<br />
Saddle-horses 3 6 0<br />
Slaughtered<br />
horses<br />
TOTAL<br />
4<br />
22<br />
13<br />
33<br />
Co-cultivation (+)<br />
samples<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
This study presents the first report on prevalence <strong>of</strong> EFV infection<br />
in horses. The discordance between PCR and serological results<br />
can be due to application <strong>of</strong> BFV specific tests instead <strong>of</strong> EFV<br />
specific serological assays. Therefore further studies are<br />
essential to develop EFV specific serological tests to confirm<br />
obtained results. Nevertheless, our study clearly shows that EFV<br />
infections are present among horses in Poland.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ali Saïb and Dr. Joelle<br />
Tobaly-Tapiero for providing EFV positive DNA and serum<br />
controls.<br />
0<br />
0