22.11.2013 Views

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S1 - P - 04<br />

DIAGNOSIS OF MAIN HAEMOPARASITIC DISEASES OF CATTLE BY REAL-TIME PCR.<br />

Villa Aleida 1 ; Benito AA 1 ; Arnal JL 1 ; Serrano JD 1 and Baselga R 1 .<br />

1 EXOPOL Autovacunas y Diagnóstico. Pol. Río Gállego, 50840 San Mateo de Gállego Zaragoza, España. Tel 976 69 45 25, exopol@exopol.com<br />

Piroplasmosis, Anaplasmosis, Diagnostic, qPCR, cattle<br />

Introduction<br />

Piroplasmosis and Anaplasmosis are the most important blood<br />

parasitic diseases in cattle and responsible for significant<br />

economical losses and mortality in livestock from many countries.<br />

Although these diseases occur mainly in tropical and subtropical<br />

areas, they are also becoming an increasing and serious problem<br />

in Europe ( 1 ). Clinical signs in haemoparasitic diseases are quite<br />

similar and include anemia, pyrexia, weakness, weight loss and<br />

drop in production levels. Bovine Piroplasmosis is caused by<br />

pathogenic Babesia and Theileria species. Th. parva and Th.<br />

annulata are the most important pathogens in this genus,<br />

although only Th. Annulata has been described in Europe ( 2 ).<br />

There are several pathogenic Babesia species affecting cattle (B.<br />

major, B. bovis, B. divergens and B.bigemina), but B. bigemina<br />

and B. bovis are the most frequently described ( 3 ). Bovine<br />

Anaplasmosis is caused by rickettsia <strong>of</strong> genus Anaplasma. A.<br />

marginale is considered the most pathogenic specie while A.<br />

centrale has been implicated in mild or less severe cases <strong>of</strong> this<br />

disease ( 4 ) .<br />

Laboratory diagnosis <strong>of</strong> these pathogens included<br />

their microscopical identification in blood smears; however, this<br />

method requires highly qualified personnel and is not reliable for<br />

detecting pre-symptomatic or carrier animals. Serological tests<br />

can also be used; although problems <strong>of</strong> cross-reactivity between<br />

pathogens <strong>of</strong> same genus have been reported. Recently, some<br />

techniques <strong>of</strong> polymerase chain reaction (PCR) have been<br />

developed and allowed a specific and sensitive detection <strong>of</strong> these<br />

agents ( 5 ) .<br />

The main objective <strong>of</strong> this study was evaluate the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> a Real-time PCR (qPCR) assay for the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

Th. annulata, Th. parva, B. bigemina, B. bovis, A. marginale, A.<br />

centrale and A. phagocitophylum, in a multiparametric test for a<br />

specific identification and also quantification <strong>of</strong> these main tickborne<br />

pathogens <strong>of</strong> cattle.<br />

Materials & methods<br />

Samples: A total <strong>of</strong> 122 cases (330 blood, 58 serum and 9 tissue<br />

samples) submitted to our laboratory with suspect <strong>of</strong><br />

haemoparasitic disease were evaluated. Some <strong>of</strong> these cases<br />

(10% aprox) had macroscopical findings and histopathological<br />

lesions <strong>of</strong> haemolytic syndrome. Most <strong>of</strong> cases 93% (113/122)<br />

came from 21 provinces in Spain and the rest from Portugal.<br />

Whole blood, serum and tissue samples were subjected to DNA<br />

extraction individually or pooled up to five per case.<br />

DNA extraction: A commercial kit “Genomic mini Kit LGD 500<br />

LabTurbo” and an automated DNA/RNA extraction System<br />

“LabTurbo 36 compact system C3620” (Taigen Bioscience<br />

Corporation, Taiwan) were used for DNA extraction following the<br />

manufacturer's instructions. DNA purity (260/280) and DNA yields<br />

were determined using a micro-volume spectrophotometer<br />

(Quawell UV Q5000, s<strong>of</strong>tware 4.0).<br />

Quantitative Real-Time PCR (Genesig Ltd): The qPCR assays<br />

used in this study identified the following pathogen-specific<br />

targets: Tams1 gene (Merozoite-piroplasm surface antigen) for<br />

Th. annulata; p104 gene (Microneme-rhoptry antigen) for Th.<br />

Parva; 18S gene (18S ribosomal RNA) for B. bigemina; 18S<br />

gene (18S ribosomal RNA) for B. bovis; msp4 gene (Major<br />

surface protein 4) for A. marginale; gen; msp2 gene (Major<br />

surface protein 2) for A. centrale and msp4 gene (Major surface<br />

protein 4) for A. phagocytophylum. A unique qPCR protocol were<br />

performed for all these pathogens according manufacturer's<br />

instructions, briefly: 10µl <strong>of</strong> MasterMix, 1µl <strong>of</strong> pathogen-specific<br />

primer/probe (FAM labeled, BHQ quenched), 5µl <strong>of</strong> RNAse/<br />

DNAse free water and 5µl <strong>of</strong> DNA sample (> 5ng) or control<br />

template conformed the PCR reaction in a final volume <strong>of</strong> 20 µl.<br />

Amplification reactions were carried out on a MiniOpticon RT<br />

System CFB3120 thermal cycler (Bio Rad, s<strong>of</strong>tware CFX<br />

manager 2.0) using a unique thermal pr<strong>of</strong>ile for all qPCRs<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> an initial enzyme activation step <strong>of</strong> 10 min a 95º C,<br />

followed by 50 cycles <strong>of</strong>: a denaturing step <strong>of</strong> 10 sec at 95º C,<br />

and an annealing/data collection step <strong>of</strong> 60 second at 60º C.<br />

Positive cut-<strong>of</strong>f value was established in ≤ 45 cycles. Detection<br />

limits and quantification were performed by 10 fold dilutions (10 6<br />

a 10 0 ) <strong>of</strong> specific DNA plasmids for each pathogen. Negative<br />

samples were evaluated for DNA integrity by amplification <strong>of</strong><br />

Beta-actina house-keeping gene.<br />

Results<br />

This multi-parametric qPCR assay was robust, specific and<br />

showed an analytical sensitivity for at less 10 2 copies <strong>of</strong> the target<br />

DNA. The Cq values for positive controls ranged from 25 to 35<br />

and the qPCR efficiencies were around 95% with R 2<br />

values<br />

above 0.990. A total <strong>of</strong> 122 cases were evaluated in this study<br />

and 49% (59/122) <strong>of</strong> them were positive by qPCR for at less one<br />

<strong>of</strong> these pathogens. Haemoparasites were detected in blood<br />

samples 52% (171/330), but also in tissue 22% (2/9) and serum<br />

38% (22/58) samples. Nearly 10% <strong>of</strong> cases had macroscopical<br />

and/or histopathological lesions compatible with haemolytic<br />

syndrome. Microscopical identification <strong>of</strong> Piroplasmids and<br />

Anaplasma were found in blood and/or tissue samples from 8 <strong>of</strong><br />

these cases and all <strong>of</strong> them had one or more positive result for<br />

haemoparasites by qPCR. From the overall cases Th. annulata<br />

27% (33/122) and A. marginale 27% (33/122) were the more<br />

frequent detected pathogens, followed by B. bigemina 16%<br />

(20/122), B. bovis 2% (3/122) and A. phaghocytophylum 2%<br />

(2/122). No positive cases were recorded for Th. Parva (0/122)<br />

and A. centrale (0/122). Concurrent infections with Th. annulata,<br />

A. marginale and B. bigemina were detected in 15% (9/57) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

positive cases.<br />

Discussion & conclusions<br />

Specific identification <strong>of</strong> haemoparasites infecting cattle is a<br />

crucial step for control <strong>of</strong> these diseases; because measures and<br />

treatment depend <strong>of</strong> the implicated agent. Although microscopical<br />

identification is possible it is not always reliable even for most<br />

expertice technicians. Clinical diagnosis is also difficult, by the<br />

similar symptomatology in these diseases. Our results clearly<br />

demonstrate the value <strong>of</strong> these qPCRs as a specifics and<br />

sensitive diagnostic tools for the rapid detection <strong>of</strong> main tickborne<br />

disease <strong>of</strong> cattle in blood and tissue sample from infected<br />

animals. The use <strong>of</strong> this qPCR multi-parametric assay allow a<br />

complete diagnosis <strong>of</strong> the main haemoparasitic diseases in a<br />

rapid way and reducing cost by pooling samples, up to five, per<br />

case. It also has the advantge for no competition <strong>of</strong> multiple<br />

primers by the target DNA, such ocurrs in a qPCR multiplex<br />

where a DNA depletion could happen mainly in animals with<br />

mixed infections. Our results showed a high percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

haemoparasitic infections, mainly Th annulata, A. marginale and<br />

B. bigemina, in the evaluated cases from the Iberian peninsula<br />

and justified the use <strong>of</strong> specific and sensitive diagnostic test, as<br />

this qPCR, to study the real epidemiological situation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

disease in the cattle population from these countries.<br />

References<br />

1. Paul Heyman, Christel Cochez, Agnetha H<strong>of</strong>huis, Joke van der Giessen,<br />

Hein Sprong, Sarah Rebecca Porter, et al. A clear and present danger:<br />

Tick-borne diseases in Europe. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010; 8(1):33-<br />

50.<br />

2. R. Cassini, F. Marcer, F. di Regalbono, G. Cancrini, S. Gabrielli, A.<br />

Moretti, et al. New insights into the epidemiology <strong>of</strong> bovine piroplasmoses<br />

in Italy. Vet Parasit <strong>2012</strong>(184):77-82.2. R. Cassini, F. Marcer, F. di<br />

Regalbono, G. Cancrini, S. Gabrielli, A. Moretti, et al. New insights into the<br />

epidemiology <strong>of</strong> bovine piroplasmoses in Italy. Vet Parasit <strong>2012</strong>(184):77-<br />

82.<br />

3. S. Almeria, J. Castellà, D. Ferrer, A. Ortuño, A. Estrada-Peña, J.F.<br />

Gutiérrez. Bovine piroplasms in Minorca (Balearic Islands, Spain): a<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> PCR-based and light microscopy detection. Vet Parasitol<br />

2001(99):249–259.<br />

4. L. Ceci, N. Decaro, E. Lorusso, P. Paradies, G. Elia, V. Martella, et al.<br />

First report <strong>of</strong> bovine anaplasmosis by Anaplasma centrale in Europe,<br />

molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis. Vet Res commun<br />

2008(32):S236-S266.<br />

5. Oficina Internacional de Epizootias (OIE). Manual de las Pruebas de<br />

Diagnóstico y de las Vacunas para los Animales Terrestres. 2008.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!