Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Abstract Book of EAVLD2012 - eavld congress 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
S3 - P - 20<br />
INTERFERON-GAMMA ASSAY TO DIAGNOSE Mycobacterium bovis INFECTION IN PIGS<br />
Michele Pesciaroli 1 , Piera Mazzone 2 , Cinzia Marianelli 1 , Sara Corneli 2 , Miriam Russo 3 , Vincenzo Aronica 3 , Michele<br />
Fiasconaro 3 , Massimo Biagetti 2 , Marcella Ciullo 2 , Monica Cagiola 2 , Paolo Pasquali 1 and Vincenzo Di Marco 3<br />
1 Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria e Sicurezza Alimentare, Italy,<br />
2 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale dell’Umbria e delle Marche, Italy, 3 Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia,Italy<br />
Mycobacterium bovis, pig, γ-IFN test<br />
Introduction<br />
Different species <strong>of</strong> animals are susceptible to Mycobacterium<br />
bovis (MB), the causative agent <strong>of</strong> bovine tuberculosis (bTB) and<br />
may represent both "reservoir" <strong>of</strong> infection or "spillover host".<br />
Swine, until a few years ago, was considered only a spillover host<br />
(1). In areas where MB is still present in cattle which share the<br />
pasture with the pig population, the marginal role attributed to the<br />
pig in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> infection <strong>of</strong> MB is strongly questioned.<br />
When high rates <strong>of</strong> infection are observed also in pigs, this<br />
species may play the role <strong>of</strong> true "reservoir" (2). The diagnostic<br />
procedures used to identify in vivo MB infected cattle, including<br />
skin test (IDT) and γ-interferon (γ-IFN) test, are also adopted in<br />
other animal species (3,4) but their application in pigs has not<br />
been completely evaluated. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to<br />
calculate the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the γ-IFN test in pigs infected with MB,<br />
compared with the results <strong>of</strong> post-mortem diagnostic tests<br />
(pathological examination and culture).<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Animals: The Black Sicilian Pig is a traditional Italian breed native<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Nebrodi Park (Sicily). These pigs are usually reared in freerange<br />
farms and share the pasture with cattle. In this area the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> TB in cattle ranges from 5.36% to 8.58% (data<br />
2010 Italian Ministry <strong>of</strong> Health). For the study, 100 Blacks Sicilian<br />
Pigs, coming from farms with bTB positive cases (2), aging from<br />
12 to 24 months, were randomly sampled at the abattoir <strong>of</strong> Mirto<br />
(Sicily). In addition, 15 healthy pigs from tuberculosis-free herds<br />
were sampled at the same abattoir and used to set up the<br />
method and as negative controls.<br />
Protocol and dose response curves <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ: Samples <strong>of</strong> whole<br />
blood <strong>of</strong> the 15 healthy pigs were stimulated with 5μl/ml <strong>of</strong><br />
Pokeweed mitogen (PWM) (Sigma-Aldrich, MS, USA) and 5μl/ml<br />
<strong>of</strong> "Phosphate Buffered Saline" (0.01M PBS, pH 7.2). The<br />
production <strong>of</strong> γ-IFN by lymphocytes was evaluated using a<br />
sandwich ELISA (Porcine IFN-gamma Quantikine ELISA Kit,<br />
R&D Systems, Mn, USA) on the supernatant collected after 24<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> incubation at 37 °C at 5% CO 2 . The stimulation with PBS<br />
did not induce any production <strong>of</strong> IFN-γ; on the contrary, the blood<br />
samples stimulated with PWM, showed an average production <strong>of</strong><br />
γ-IFN <strong>of</strong> 2633 µg/ml, with a standard deviation <strong>of</strong> 688.2 µg/ml.<br />
The samples stimulated with PWM, with a value below 1250<br />
µg/ml (calculated as mean - 2 SD), were excluded from the<br />
analysis because considered unresponsive.<br />
γ-IFN test: Heparinized blood samples, taken at the<br />
slaughterhouse, were dispensed in aliquots <strong>of</strong> 1.5 ml in 24-well<br />
plates (Costar, Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA). The<br />
lymphocyte stimulation was performed in duplicate: PBS, for the<br />
evaluation <strong>of</strong> the basal value <strong>of</strong> γ-IFN (N); PWM (5 μl/ml); bovine<br />
PPD (10μg/ml); avian PPD (10μg/ml). The PPDs (purified protein<br />
derivatives), used in the experiment, were both produced by the<br />
Istituto Zoopr<strong>of</strong>ilattico dell’Umbria e delle Marche (IZSUM),<br />
according to the <strong>of</strong>ficial protocols (EC Regulation N o 1226/2002).<br />
The values obtained from each sample, expressed in units <strong>of</strong><br />
Optical Density (OD), were interpreted as reported below.<br />
Table 1. Possible outcomes following lymphocytes stimulation<br />
with avian and bovine PPDs (OD 450 nm )<br />
AOD & BOD < 2N<br />
Negative<br />
AOD or BOD > 2N<br />
AOD 2 N Positive for M. avium<br />
BOD 2 N Positive for M. bovis<br />
BOD/AOD 0,9 Positive for M. avium<br />
AOD & BOD > 2N BOD/AOD 1,1 Positive for M. bovis<br />
0.9 BOD/AOD 1,1 Doubt<br />
N = baseline value (value obtained with PBS only)<br />
AOD = value obtained after stimulation with avian PPD<br />
BOD = value obtained after stimulation with bovine PPD<br />
Pathological examination (EAP): The macroscopic examination<br />
was conducted at the slaughterhouse in accordance with<br />
conventional inspection methods. Samples <strong>of</strong> lymph nodes (LN)<br />
from the head (mandibular, retropharyngeal, parotid LN), the<br />
thorax (bronchial LN), and the abdomen (hepatic, gastric,<br />
intestinal LN) were also collected from all the pigs.<br />
Microbiology: Bacterial culture for MB was performed according<br />
to the Italian Ministerial Decree (DM 592/1995) on each lymph<br />
node. Suspect colonies, testing positive for acid fast staining,<br />
were further identified through bio-molecular techniques (3).<br />
Results<br />
Of the 100 pigs involved in the study, 2 subjects did not respond<br />
to stimulation with PWM; these animals were excluded from the<br />
final evaluation. EAP and culture identified respectively 26<br />
(26,5% ) and 19 (19,4%) positive pigs . γ–IFN assay identified 22<br />
positive pigs among the 26 with tubercular lesions and 15 among<br />
the 19 with positive bacterial culture (Table 2). The sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
the test, assuming as gold standard the traditional tests, resulted<br />
84,6% (95% CI 52.6-100%) and 78,9% (95% CI 44.8-100%)<br />
respectively.<br />
Table 2: Comparison between the results obtained in γ-IFN test,<br />
EAP and culture for M. bovis. P: Positive N: Negative.<br />
Lesion<br />
Culture for M. bovis<br />
P N P N<br />
P 22 4 15 11<br />
γ- IFN<br />
N 4 68 4 68<br />
Total 26 72 19 79<br />
Discussion & conclusions<br />
Our results demonstrate the circulation, in the Nebrodi Park, <strong>of</strong><br />
MB also in the swine population that inhabits this area (2),<br />
supporting the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> an epidemiological role <strong>of</strong> the Black<br />
Sicilian pig as a significant reservoir <strong>of</strong> infection. Therefore, the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> future control strategies also in this species is<br />
needed. In this perspective, γ-IFN test could represent a good<br />
tool for intra vitam diagnosis <strong>of</strong> bTB in pigs. The study results<br />
show, in general, an acceptable level <strong>of</strong> agreement between<br />
traditional diagnostic tests and γ-IFN test. In particular, as shown<br />
in Table 2, there is a better agreement with the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
tubercular lesions rather than with the MB isolation. This feature<br />
can be explained with a generally low sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the cultural<br />
test (4). Animals with positive reaction at γ-IFN test showing<br />
neither macroscopic lesions nor MB infections could be assumed<br />
as false positive. However, they could also be ascribed to the<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> this immunoassay to identify recently infected<br />
subjects with still unapparent lesions at least during the routine<br />
post-mortem inspection. These preliminary results encourage us<br />
to plan future research to optimize γ-IFN test performance in<br />
swine. This study was founded by the Research Project <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Seventh Framework Program “Strategies for the eradication <strong>of</strong><br />
bovine tuberculosis” (Contract Number 212414 – Acronyms TB-<br />
STEP).<br />
References<br />
1. O’Reilly L. M., Daborn C. J., (1995) The epidemiology <strong>of</strong> Mycobacterium<br />
bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tubercle and lung disease.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>ficial journal <strong>of</strong> the International Union against Tuberculosis and<br />
Lung Disease, 76 Suppl. 1: 1-46.<br />
2. V. Di Marco, P. Mazzone, MT. Capucchio, MB. Boniotti, V. Aronica, M.<br />
Russo, M. Fiasconaro, N. Cifani, S. Corneli, E. Biasibetti, M. Biagetti, ML.<br />
Pacciarini, M. Cagiola, P. Pasquali, and C. Marianelli. “Epidemiological<br />
Significance <strong>of</strong> the Domestic Black Pig (Sus scr<strong>of</strong>a) in Maintenance <strong>of</strong><br />
Bovine Tuberculosis in Sicily” J Clin Microbiol. <strong>2012</strong> Apr;50(4):1209-18.<br />
Epub <strong>2012</strong> Feb 8.<br />
3. OIE Manual <strong>of</strong> Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals<br />
2010 Chapter 2.4.7. Bovine tuberculosis (Version adopted in May 2009)<br />
4. Boadella M., Lyashchenko K., Greenwald R., Esfandiari J., Jaroso R.,<br />
Carta T., Garrido J. M., Vicente J., de la Fuente J., Gortázar C. (2011)<br />
Serologic tests for detecting antibodies against Mycobacterium bovis and<br />
Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Eurasian wild boar<br />
(Sus scr<strong>of</strong>a scr<strong>of</strong>a). J Vet Diagn Invest. 23 (1): 77-83