18.12.2013 Views

Acoustic Emission Monitoring of CFRP Laminated Composites ...

Acoustic Emission Monitoring of CFRP Laminated Composites ...

Acoustic Emission Monitoring of CFRP Laminated Composites ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

36 Chapter 3. <strong>Acoustic</strong> <strong>Emission</strong><br />

growth, i.e. a material change, produces AE only once, but the resulting<br />

rubbing <strong>of</strong> damage surfaces generates AE many times.<br />

Dierent and in some cases contradictory results have been published<br />

using amplitude features. According to Duesing, 11 Barré and Benzeggagh<br />

142 and Ativitavas et al. 143 ber breakage emits high AE amplitudes<br />

whereas Ono explains that high amplitudes are caused by rapid advances<br />

<strong>of</strong> delamination and carbon ber fracture is characterized by low amplitude<br />

signals. 144<br />

Godin et al. claimed that conventional AE feature analysis<br />

cannot be used to distinguish between dierent AE sources and suggested<br />

that more advanced methods, such as multivariate analysis and classiers,<br />

should be used. 145 Similar comments were made by Tsamtsakis et al.; 8<br />

they suggested that new parameters, such as force or displacement, should<br />

be added.<br />

Ativitavas et al. developed an amplitude ltering technique using a<br />

normalized load to lter out low amplitudes, and claimed that a reliable<br />

isolation <strong>of</strong> AE signals due to ber breakage was obtained. 143<br />

The intuitive<br />

reason behind this is that it requires more energy to break the bers than it<br />

does to damage the matrix, because the bers have higher Young's modulus<br />

and higher strength. Hence, high amplitude AE is generated when the<br />

bers break. This idea was veried by comparing the cumulative signal<br />

hits (with respect to the loads <strong>of</strong> the ltered signal) with cumulative signal<br />

strength and the cumulative number <strong>of</strong> ber breaks. The results showed<br />

strong correlation.<br />

<strong>Acoustic</strong> <strong>Emission</strong> frequency analysis techniques have mostly been limited<br />

to classical approaches like the FFT. When used, the aim has been to<br />

determine frequency bands which can be related to certain damage mechanisms.<br />

The results presented by Bochse determined the frequency bands<br />

for three types <strong>of</strong> damage. 146<br />

Frequencies due to matrix cracks were found<br />

to reside in the 100 to 350 kHz band, and ber breakage was given the interval<br />

between 350 to 700 kHz. The sources were classied according to the<br />

criterion that 70% <strong>of</strong> the signal power had to lie within either frequency<br />

band. If not, the source was expected to be debonding. Similar results<br />

were presented in a paper by de Groot et al. in which the frequency spectrum<br />

between 50 to 600 kHz was analyzed. 49<br />

They determined that matrix<br />

cracks emit frequencies between 90 to 180 kHz, ber pull-out release frequencies<br />

between 180 to 240 kHz, debonding produces frequencies between<br />

240 to 310 kHz, and that bre breakage gives AE with frequencies above

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!