nanoscience and society - IAP/TU Wien
nanoscience and society - IAP/TU Wien
nanoscience and society - IAP/TU Wien
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
468 Nanoelectronics<br />
or bottom up. The present-day route to the fabrication<br />
of nanelectronics devices relies on the top-down approach,<br />
utilizing high-throughput optical lithography<br />
for feature sizes down to 180 nm, <strong>and</strong> electron beam<br />
lithography for feature sizes down to 30 nm with a low<br />
throughput (for masks).<br />
The top-down approach is the extension of established<br />
methods of engineering <strong>and</strong> microelectronics<br />
processing that relies on a selective patterning process,<br />
often described in terms of depositing, patterning, <strong>and</strong><br />
etching layers of material to define the circuitry <strong>and</strong> active<br />
elements. This approach continues with the miniaturization<br />
of electronic components by the development<br />
of strongly improved production processes <strong>and</strong> materials,<br />
starting from current practices. These methods are<br />
amenable to mass manufacturing, which has resulted in<br />
reduced costs (per transistor) for high-end electronics<br />
products. This approach enables developers to profit<br />
from the low-cost mass manufacturing expertise already<br />
acquired with silicon-based systems. However, exponentially<br />
increasing fabrication costs <strong>and</strong> fundamental<br />
physical limitations remain significant challenges for<br />
continued top-down miniaturization over the next decade.<br />
Top-down approaches rely on control of damage,<br />
<strong>and</strong> as the structures become smaller, the defects make<br />
device operation increasingly problematic.<br />
In addition to the top-down approach of fabricating<br />
nanoelectronics devices, nanoscientists are also<br />
employing a bottom-up approach that is based on the<br />
self-assembly techniques of atoms <strong>and</strong> molecules. Self<strong>and</strong><br />
directed-assembly mechanisms are phenomena<br />
often found in nature, from the growth of crystals to<br />
the formation of complex functional biological systems,<br />
including the cells of the human body. Therefore, in attempting<br />
the bottom-up method, nature was used as a<br />
model, <strong>and</strong> the assembly of complex structures was approached<br />
by starting with single atoms <strong>and</strong> molecules.<br />
However, the mechanisms of such processes are still not<br />
well understood <strong>and</strong> research <strong>and</strong> development in this<br />
field represents a formidable challenge.<br />
Bottom-up nanofabrication refers to device fabrication<br />
on an atom-by-atom basis. Bottom-up processes<br />
use chemically or biologically inspired routes for synthesis<br />
<strong>and</strong> assembly of nanoscale building blocks into complex<br />
nanoarchitectures with novel electronic or optical<br />
properties. Molecules, which are prefabricated arrangements<br />
of atoms in a functional form, are also appealing<br />
for bottom-up fabrication. The advantage of the bottom-up<br />
approach lies in the design <strong>and</strong> chemical synthesis<br />
of functional molecules by the billions, which can<br />
then be assembled into nanoelectronic devices. Such an<br />
approach will drastically reduce fabrication costs. However,<br />
development of controlled assembly strategies for<br />
integration of bottom-up nanostructures <strong>and</strong> nanoarchitectures<br />
into electronic devices <strong>and</strong> circuits remains<br />
a significant long-term challenge. In the medium-term,<br />
development of hybrid top-down/bottom-up fabrication<br />
strategies for electronics represents a key opportunity.<br />
Progress along both of these avenues will entail a<br />
massive amount of research effort <strong>and</strong> investment in resources.<br />
Expert opinion is that eventually the top-down<br />
<strong>and</strong> bottom-up approaches can both be combined into<br />
a single nanoelectronics manufacturing process, where<br />
certain manufacturing steps can then be carried out using<br />
the top-down approach <strong>and</strong> others using the bottomup<br />
approach. Such a hybrid method has the potential to<br />
lead to a more economical nanomanufacturing process.<br />
Emerging Devices<br />
A single-electron transistor (SET) is a three-terminal<br />
device that has switching properties controlled by the<br />
addition or subtraction of one electron, or through<br />
which only one electron may be transported at a time.<br />
The single-electron transistor is an example of a threeterminal<br />
device in which the charge of a single electron<br />
is sufficient to switch the source-to-drain current. SET<br />
devices are perceived by some to be the natural successor<br />
to the metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor<br />
(MOSFET) although the research is also perceived<br />
by some companies as a method to investigate the ultimate<br />
limits of the MOSFET itself, as single electron<br />
effects will limit normal transistor action at the smallest<br />
length scales. SET devices are predominantly aimed at<br />
high-density, low-power applications.<br />
There are a number of designs for low-power SET<br />
logics, but they do not look very encouraging due to<br />
large time constants limiting the operation at very high<br />
speeds. The SET, however, shows promise for memory,<br />
probably not in the form of a single electron transistor,<br />
but more likely in the form of a nanoflash memory,<br />
since a number of the designs are a miniature version<br />
of conventional flash-type memory devices. The SET<br />
seems to be a natural extension for conventional flashtype<br />
memory devices, <strong>and</strong> may even take over for static<br />
r<strong>and</strong>om-access memory, possibly bridging the gap between<br />
more st<strong>and</strong>ard CMOS <strong>and</strong> the single-electron