21.12.2013 Views

PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

27<br />

secondary consequence of drought because nutrients cannot be<br />

sufficiently transported in the soil and inside the plant.<br />

Since water is a major factor that determines productivity, the sample<br />

analysis was differentiated by irrigation.<br />

Figure 4.6 shows yields for irrigated and non-irrigated cotton in across<br />

and in on-farm comparison.<br />

Figure 4.6:<br />

Cotton yield for different conditions, across-farm<br />

and on-farm comparison, 2002<br />

Yield [kg/ha]<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

Irrigated<br />

Non-Irrigated<br />

0<br />

B t-C otton O nly-B t-C otton N o n-B t-C otton<br />

Cross-Farm Com parison<br />

Yield [kg/ha]<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

Irrig ated<br />

Non-Irrigated<br />

0<br />

B t-C o tto n<br />

On-Farm Comparison<br />

N o n -B t-C o tto n<br />

Source: Own Calculations, 2002<br />

Under rain-fed conditions, there are no significant differences between<br />

Bt and non-Bt cotton yields for across-farm comparison (see Annex A-4<br />

and A-5). The on-farm comparison shows a small yield increase for Bt<br />

cotton <strong>und</strong>er rain-fed conditions. There are differences for cotton <strong>und</strong>er<br />

irrigated conditions. The Bt cotton groups show significant higher yields<br />

as compared to non-Bt cotton.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!