PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

More documents

Recommendations

Info

48 Annex A-13: Pesticide consumption in India and important states [mill. t] Consumption [mill t] 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 Maharshtra Punjab Tamil Nadu Karnataka All India 80000 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 Consumption [mill t] 2000 10000 0 1980-81 1985-86 1990-91 1995-96 2000-01 0 Source: NCIPM, 2003 Annex A-14: Cotton production, area, yield and world market share, 1997/1998 Country Market Share [%] Area [mill ha] Production [t] Yield [kg/ha] China 24.5 4.56 4.30 934 USA 16.5 5.37 4.13 769 India 15.2 8.90 2.86 321 Pakistan 7.5 2.89 1.59 552 Egypt 1.3 0.36 0.32 873 Turkey 4.6 0.71 0.75 1065 World 100.0 33.82 19.74 584 Source: Choudhary, 2001
49 Annex A-15: Productivity of cotton in India [kg/ha] by state State 90- 91 91- 92 92- 93 93- 94 Punjab 424 597 539 339 407 325 367 182 171 340 Haryana 393 488 441 343 355 297 353 234 217 367 Rajasthan 263 393 393 415 366 386 364 337 320 458 Gujarat 275 224 304 365 340 377 382 490 451 392 Maharashtra 92 81 139 91 98 159 182 112 133 199 Madhya 494 272 355 397 469 451 605 714 639 471 Pradesh Andhra 461 474 514 637 662 440 447 495 4242 430 Pradesh Karnataka 248 260 322 240 265 240 229 213 237 257 Tamil Nadu 373 370 405 407 375 321 360 353 425 374 Mean 267 268 316 282 298 293 327 305 266 333 Source: Cotton Corporation of India, 2003 94- 95 95- 96 96- 97 97- 98 98- 99 99- 00 Annex A-16: Area [mill ha] <strong>und</strong>er different species and hybrids in India Total Area G.hirsutum G.barbadense G.arboreum G.herbaceum Hybrids Northern Z. 1.14 0 0.20 0 0 (85) (15) Central Z. 1.19 0 1.04 0.68 1.75 (26) (23) (15) (36) Southern Z 0.35 0.01 0.05 0.20 0.95 (22) (1) (3) (13) (65) India 2.68 0.01 1.29 0.88 2.70 (35.5) (0.1) (17) (11.5) (36) Note: The values in brackets show the percentage of cotton area in the respective zone Source: Basu, Paroda, 1995
Page 2 and 3:
Comparative Analysis of the Economi
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 7 and 8:
v List of Tables Table 1.1: Table 2
Page 9 and 10:
vii Figure A-6: Annex A-7: Annex A-
Page 11 and 12:
ix Preface Biotechnology has rapidl
Page 13 and 14: xi Acknowledgements I am very thank
Page 15: use by farmers depends on many othe
Page 18 and 19: 2 environmental effects (Corpwatch,
Page 20 and 21: 4 1.3 Bt cotton in India “Bacillu
Page 22 and 23: 6 Box 1.2: Chronology of Bt cotton
Page 24 and 25: 2 Study area The state of Karnataka
Page 26 and 27: 10 cotton/ha is low as compared to
Page 28 and 29: 12 The survey was mainly carried ou
Page 30 and 31: 14 Cotton yields were calculated by
Page 32 and 33: 16 Small farmers grew cotton on aro
Page 34 and 35: 18 Farmer’s ex-post evaluation af
Page 36 and 37: 4.4 Pesticide use According to Khad
Page 38 and 39: 22 Table 4.6 presents the quantity
Page 40 and 41: 24 Figure 4.4 presents the differen
Page 42 and 43: 26 4.5 Productivity of Non-Bt and B
Page 44 and 45: 28 The comparisons also show the in
Page 46 and 47: 30 4.6 Economics of Cotton Producti
Page 48 and 49: 32 irrigation was available. After
Page 50 and 51: 34 gross margin for Bt cotton was s
Page 52 and 53: 36 9. Bt cotton seems to be perform
Page 54 and 55: 38 India more location-specific inf
Page 56 and 57: 40 Hayat Dr. Y. (1993): Monitoring
Page 58 and 59: 42 Annex Annex A-1: Villages in stu
Page 60 and 61: 44 Annex A-4: Yield of Bt and non-B
Page 62 and 63: 46 Annex A-7: (continued) Sales rat
Page 66 and 67: 50 Annex A-18: Estimates of area an
Page 68 and 69: 52 Annex A-21: Performance of diffe
Page 71 and 72: University of Hannover PESTICIDE PO
show all

PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?