PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

More documents

Recommendations

Info

50 Annex A-18: Estimates of area and production of cotton from 1997/1998 to 1999/2000 (by lint quality) [area in 100,000 hectares, production in 100,000 bales of 170 kg each] Area Production Staple Length 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 1. Long i. Superior Long (27 mm & above) ii. Long (24.5 to 26 mm) 22.0 25.7 24.0 37.4 47.9 35.8 14.2 15.7 14.9 10.9 14.5 15.3 Sub-Total (long) 36.2 41.4 38.9 48.3 62.4 51.1 2. Medium i. Superior Medium (22 to 24 mm) ii. Medium (20 to 21.5 mm) 36.7 35.5 32.7 43.9 43.2 44.6 2.6 2.0 2.0 3.2 2.8 2.5 Sub-Total (medium) 39.3 37.5 34.7 47.1 46.0 47.1 3. Short i. Short (19 mm & below) 13.2 14.5 13.5 13.1 14.5 17.1 Total 88.7 93.4 87.1 1<strong>08</strong>.5 122.9 115.3 Source: Cotton Corporation of India, 2003
51 Annex A-19: Cotton area [1,000 ha] and yield [kg/ha] in Karnataka Year Area Yield 1955-56 1152 47 1960-61 984 69 1965-66 1005 44 1970-71 1142 95 1975-76 1035 87 1980-81 1012 106 1985-86 674 135 1990-91 596 192 1995-96 678 254 1996-97 660 274 1997-98 499 259 1998-99 638 252 Source: Karnataka Statistics, 2000 Annex A-20: Area covered and consumption of pesticides in Karnataka Year Area covered <strong>und</strong>er Plant Consumption of Pesticides [tons] Protection Measures [in 100,000 ha] 1970-71 30.10 2107 1975-76 34.55 1546 1980-81 33.80 2631 1985-86 40.76 3277 1990-91 59.38 4170 1995-96 58.60 3924 2000-01 57.00 2600 Source: Karnataka Statistics, 2000
Page 2 and 3:
Comparative Analysis of the Economi
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 7 and 8:
v List of Tables Table 1.1: Table 2
Page 9 and 10:
vii Figure A-6: Annex A-7: Annex A-
Page 11 and 12:
ix Preface Biotechnology has rapidl
Page 13 and 14:
xi Acknowledgements I am very thank
Page 15: use by farmers depends on many othe
Page 18 and 19: 2 environmental effects (Corpwatch,
Page 20 and 21: 4 1.3 Bt cotton in India “Bacillu
Page 22 and 23: 6 Box 1.2: Chronology of Bt cotton
Page 24 and 25: 2 Study area The state of Karnataka
Page 26 and 27: 10 cotton/ha is low as compared to
Page 28 and 29: 12 The survey was mainly carried ou
Page 30 and 31: 14 Cotton yields were calculated by
Page 32 and 33: 16 Small farmers grew cotton on aro
Page 34 and 35: 18 Farmer’s ex-post evaluation af
Page 36 and 37: 4.4 Pesticide use According to Khad
Page 38 and 39: 22 Table 4.6 presents the quantity
Page 40 and 41: 24 Figure 4.4 presents the differen
Page 42 and 43: 26 4.5 Productivity of Non-Bt and B
Page 44 and 45: 28 The comparisons also show the in
Page 46 and 47: 30 4.6 Economics of Cotton Producti
Page 48 and 49: 32 irrigation was available. After
Page 50 and 51: 34 gross margin for Bt cotton was s
Page 52 and 53: 36 9. Bt cotton seems to be perform
Page 54 and 55: 38 India more location-specific inf
Page 56 and 57: 40 Hayat Dr. Y. (1993): Monitoring
Page 58 and 59: 42 Annex Annex A-1: Villages in stu
Page 60 and 61: 44 Annex A-4: Yield of Bt and non-B
Page 62 and 63: 46 Annex A-7: (continued) Sales rat
Page 64 and 65: 48 Annex A-13: Pesticide consumptio
Page 68 and 69: 52 Annex A-21: Performance of diffe
Page 71 and 72: University of Hannover PESTICIDE PO
show all

PPP Special 08 - Institut für Entwicklungs- und Agrarökonomik

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?