SALAH SALEM OBAID GURBEL - ePrints@USM

LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 4.1 Consumption of filter paper treated with Imidacloprid at
various concentrations ( ppm ) by C. gestroi in choice–feeding
test. 61
Figure 4.2 Consumption of filter paper treated with Fipronil A (Agenda)
at various concentrations (ppm) by C. gestroi in choice–
feeding test 66
Figure 4.3 Consumption of filter paper with treated Fipronil R (Regent) at
various concentrations (ppm) by C. gestroi in choice–feeding
test. 67
Figure 4.4 Consumption of filter paper treated with Indoxacarb at various
concentrations (ppm) by C. gestroi in choice–feeding test. 71
Figure 4.5 Consumption of filter paper treated with Chlopyrifos at
various concentrations (ppm) by C. gestroi in choice–feeding
test 73
Figure 4.6 The relationship between the total mean consumption of treated
filter paper and the time which termite were exposed to the
treated filter paper 74
Figure 5.1 Donor peak of 1000 ppm Imidacloprid 94
Figure 5.2 Recipient peak of1000 ppm Imidacloprid 95
Figure 5.3 Standard peak of 1000 ppm Fipronil 97
Figure 5.4 Recipient + donor peaks of 1000 ppm Fipronil (Agenda) 98
Figure 5.5 Donor + recipient peaks of 1000 ppm Indoxacarb 99
Figure 6.1 Bioassay design describes the treated and un treated soil layers 107
Figure 6.2 Penetration distance and termite mortality of C. gestroi
exposed to various thicknesses of Imidacloprid (1 cm, 3cm,
5cm, 10cm) and with different concentration(0.001ppm, 1ppm,
10ppm, 100ppm, 1000ppm) 111
xii