26.12.2013 Views

Part 3 of 7 - Ibiblio

Part 3 of 7 - Ibiblio

Part 3 of 7 - Ibiblio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 ATLANTIC THEATER<br />

tions, when its size was such that naval <strong>of</strong>ficers had doubts about its<br />

continued existence. Only with much argument had the secretary<br />

managed to persuade Congress to refit ships laid up in ordinary. New<br />

construction before the commencement <strong>of</strong> the War <strong>of</strong> 1812 was out <strong>of</strong><br />

the question.<br />

The onset <strong>of</strong> war, however, brought a new dimension to the<br />

secretary's job. Whether the navy should be used if war came had been<br />

a question debated in the presence <strong>of</strong> President Madison in February<br />

1812. Secretary Hamilton, perhaps playing deviL's advocate, suggested<br />

that with such a smaLL navy, the United States would risk losing it entirely<br />

in sending ships against the British fleet . According to Irving<br />

Brant, Madison's biographer, the president took the side <strong>of</strong> the navy's<br />

more aggressive captains and argued that victories would be needed<br />

and that if our ships were lost in seeking them, they could be replaced. I<br />

With this phase <strong>of</strong> the argument settled, the question <strong>of</strong> precisely<br />

how the navy would be used remained at issue. Secretary Hamilton was<br />

careful to solicit the opinions <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> the most experienced and successful<br />

<strong>of</strong> the navy's commanders, Commodores John Rodgers and<br />

Stephen Decatur. Letters containing their replies foLLow in the order in<br />

which they were received. Their opinions differ particularly in regard<br />

to the proper disposition <strong>of</strong> warshIps at sea. Commodore Rodgers saw<br />

great advantages to be gained from combining aLL shIps in a cruising<br />

squadron that would search out British convoys and force the British to<br />

concentrate, drawing their warshIps away from A merican harbors.<br />

Commodore Decatur argued that navy ships would have better results<br />

if they were to operate either singly or in pairs.<br />

J Irvcng Brant, "r",ud Presidentl Futile War!" Am~rican H~ritage .<br />

Yol X . No. 6 (Oct.<br />

19"). PI' . • 6 .f7. 8'-89, Linda Maloney, "Tile War <strong>of</strong> 1812 WhGt Role/or Sea Power!" In<br />

Kenneth J. Hagan, ed., In Peace and War: Interpretations or American Naval History<br />

(Westport, Conn .. 1978), pp 46- 62.<br />

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY HAMILTON TO COMMODORE JOHN ROOCERS<br />

Comre Rodgers<br />

NYork<br />

Nav: Dep'mt<br />

21 May 1812<br />

As a war appears now inevitable, I request you to state to me, a plan<br />

<strong>of</strong> operations, which, in your judgment, will enable our little navy to<br />

annoy in the utmost extent, the Trade <strong>of</strong> Gt Britain while it least<br />

exposes it to the immense naval force <strong>of</strong> that Government. State also,<br />

JANUARY- AUGUST 1812 119<br />

the Pons <strong>of</strong> the US which you think the safest as assylums for our navy,<br />

In time <strong>of</strong> war.<br />

P. Hamilton<br />

Copy, DNA . RG45 , SNL, Vol. 10, pp. 41 -42. On the same day, Secretary<br />

Hamilton sent an identical letter to Commodore Decatur: see Hamilton to<br />

Decatur. 21 May 1812 , ibid. , p. 42.<br />

Sir.<br />

COMMODORE JOHN RODGERS TO<br />

SECRETARY OF TIlE NAVY HAMILTON<br />

U.S. Frigate President<br />

Staten Island June 3d, 1812<br />

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt <strong>of</strong> your letter <strong>of</strong> the 21st<br />

ult, and in answer to your enquiries permit me to state, that in my<br />

humble opinion to annoy the trade <strong>of</strong> Great Britain with the greatest<br />

effect would be at the commencement <strong>of</strong> a War, to dispose our comparatively<br />

very small force , in such a way as to harrass her W India<br />

commerce by our lightest vessels: and her coasting trade, East India<br />

trade & other foreign trade by our Frigates & one or two <strong>of</strong> our fastest<br />

sailing sloops <strong>of</strong> war: our small vessels to be disposed in a way, according<br />

to circumstances, to annoy to the greatest extent all the avem:es<br />

leading to & from her West India Islands, Surinam, Berbice, &<br />

D~namara: a. small squadron <strong>of</strong> two, or three <strong>of</strong> our fastest sailing<br />

fngates & a slOgle sloop <strong>of</strong> War, to cruise on the coasts <strong>of</strong> England,<br />

Ireland, & Scotland; & the residue <strong>of</strong> our frigates to to act seperately,<br />

or In squadron on our own coasts to harrass the enemy by cruising in<br />

the tracts <strong>of</strong> his ships trading between him & his colonies <strong>of</strong> Canada<br />

Nova Scotia, & Newfoundland; and occasionally to unite all ou~<br />

Frigates & attack his East India convoys. -<br />

This, Sir, would in my opinion, be the most advisable disposition<br />

that could be made <strong>of</strong> our little navy, at least for the first six months,<br />

perhaps during the whole <strong>of</strong> the War: as it would be menacing them<br />

10 the very teeth, & effecting the the distruction <strong>of</strong> their commerce in a<br />

manner the most perplexing to their government, & in a way the least<br />

expected by the nation generally, including those belonging to the<br />

Navy: the self styled Lords <strong>of</strong> the Oceanll

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!