26.12.2013 Views

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

elsewhere suggests that this the work of acknowledging same-sex couples in public<br />

policy is unfinished business (Johnson, 2010).<br />

The “almost quixotic” nature of the international spread of legal recognition (Weeks,<br />

2008, p. 787) is reflected in the variety of forms of recognition adopted by individual<br />

governments. Merin (2002) sets out a typology of models for legal recognition. In<br />

descending order of scope, these are marriage, registered partnership, domestic<br />

partnership and cohabitation rights. Marriage offers the most extensive package of<br />

rights and, arguably, the most intelligible and meaningful form of social recognition.<br />

Registered partnership schemes draw heavily on the rights and responsibilities<br />

attached to marriage and come close to providing legal parity, although parental and<br />

immigration rights may be excluded. Domestic partnership offers more limited<br />

rights and is often provided by sub-national governments, whereas cohabitation<br />

rights may provide minimal entitlements with regard to property. There are also<br />

variations within and beyond these models; registered partnership programmes<br />

often take other names such as civil union or civil partnership and particular forms of<br />

recognition, such as the Pacte Civil de Solidarité in France, fall between registered<br />

partnership and domestic partnership in terms of their coverage (Johnston, 2008).<br />

Canada, the UK and California reflect the different types of recognition available: the<br />

UK has legislated for civil partnerships, though same-sex marriage is now on the<br />

political agenda; Canada has legislated for marriage at the national level but provides<br />

extensive cohabitation rights; whereas California, having repealed same-sex<br />

marriage, continues to offer domestic partnerships to lesbian and gay couples. This<br />

chapter continues with an overview of the policy background to legal recognition in<br />

these jurisdictions.<br />

Liberalisation by Stealth: Civil Partnerships in the UK<br />

Waaldijk’s model of standard sequences (2001) would appear to hold true for the<br />

UK, with decriminalisation in England and Wales in 1967, Scotland in 1980 and<br />

Northern Ireland in 1982, paving the way for anti-discrimination protection,<br />

acknowledgement of parenting rights and, latterly, civil partnerships. However, this<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!