26.12.2013 Views

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

Save PDF (1.9 MB) - CORE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eaks to married and civil partner couples signalling his government’s support for<br />

providing couples with incentives to get married (Kirkup, 2012).<br />

Anthropology has uncovered a bewildering variety of marriage types in different<br />

locations and historical eras, including polygamous and polyandrous marriages<br />

(Chambers 2012, p. 16). Stephanie Coontz’s (2004) survey of the evolution of<br />

marriage practices over a five thousand year period provides a challenge to takenfor-granted<br />

understandings of marriage as being set in stone. For example, medieval<br />

understandings of marriage as a private contract, geared towards securing economic<br />

interests may seem far-removed from present-day notions of marriage as providing<br />

a context for romantic love, companionship and the pursuit of individual happiness.<br />

Coontz also makes clear that the romantic ideal of the love match is a relatively<br />

recent innovation, with material considerations such as assets, skills and capabilities<br />

likely to have informed one’s choice of spouse, and rapid and sustained social<br />

change in the West since the industrial revolution has meant that our understanding<br />

of marriage and family life continue to evolve.<br />

In a more recent historical context, Talcott Parsons’s (1955) structural functionalist<br />

model of the nuclear family, although highly influential in the post-war period,<br />

already appears dated and oppressive. The highly gendered roles of husband as<br />

breadwinner and wife as nurturer and homemaker, allocated the complementary<br />

roles of paid employment and childcare, now appears suffocating. This narrow<br />

model of White, suburban, middle-class family life may have proved to be more of a<br />

straitjacket than a haven from the demands of modern industrial society.<br />

Since the Second World War, dominant models of marriage as an institution, as<br />

providing a dominant framework for adult life, have given way to a focus on<br />

marriage as a context for companionship (Burgess and Locke, 1945), with the quest<br />

for emotional satisfaction playing a greater role in individual choices around<br />

marriage. The near universality of marriage in Western societies in the post-war era<br />

(Kiernan, 2004, p. 980) has itself given way to a period of much greater diversity,<br />

with options including cohabitation, divorce or remarriage becoming more viable, as<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!