Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS
Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS
Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY 37<br />
Type species.-Thysanophyllum orientale Nicholson and<br />
Thomson, 1876, p. 150. Lower Carboniferous, Scotland.<br />
Discussion.- Thysanophyllum is distinguished by its<br />
cerioid corallum having corallites with a lonsdaleoid<br />
dissepimentarium and lacking an axial structure or having<br />
a weak impersistent axial plate. The genus is probably<br />
polyphyletic like other colonial rugose corals<br />
without a persistent axial structure, corals such as<br />
Diphyphyllum and Pseudodorlodotia.<br />
Thysanophyllum astraeiforme (W arran)<br />
Diphyphyllum aJJtraeiformis Warren, 1927, p. 44, pl. 3; figs. 2, 3.<br />
<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> aJJtraeiformis (Warren). Kelly, 1942, p. 352; Bamber,<br />
1961, p. 152, pl. 12, figs. 1a, b; Nelson, 1961, pl. 18, figs. 1-3.<br />
<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> (Thysarwphyllum) aJJtraeijormis (Warren). Nelson,<br />
1960, p. 115, pl. 22, figs. 7-10.<br />
Thysarwphyllum aJJtraeiforme (Warren). Bamber, 1966, p. 23, pl. 4,<br />
figs. 3a-b, 4a-c; Armstrong, 1970a, p. 37, pl. 11, figs. 5-8; 1970b,<br />
p. 28, pl. 9, figs. 1-6, text-fig. 33.<br />
Desc.-'ription <strong>of</strong> lectotype.- See Bamber (1966).<br />
Discussion.-This species is rather common in<br />
western Canada and Alaska, where it ranges from<br />
Mamet Zone 13 into 16i; it is most common in Mamet<br />
Zones 14 and 15. These occurrences are <strong>of</strong> middle and<br />
late Visean age. The structure <strong>of</strong> the columella, where<br />
present, suggests relationship to Acrocyathus.<br />
Genus LONSDALEIA McCoy, 1849<br />
Lonsdaleia McCoy, 1849, p. 11; Smith, 1916, p. 218; Hill, 1940, p. 151;<br />
Sando, 1975, p. C20.<br />
Type species. -Erismatolithus Madreporites<br />
(duplicatus) Martin, 1809, equals Lonsdaleia duplicata<br />
(Martin). Lower Carboniferous, England.<br />
Diagnosis.- See Cotton (1973, p. 117).<br />
Discussion.-The genus is subdivided into two<br />
subgenera on the basis <strong>of</strong> growth form: Lonsdaleia<br />
(Lonsdaleia), phaceloid, and Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus),<br />
cerioid.<br />
Subgenus ACTINOCYATHUS d'Orbigny, 1849<br />
Actinocyathus d'Orbigny, 1849a, p. 12.<br />
Stylidnphyllum de Fromentel, 1861, p. 316.<br />
?Protolomdalia Lisitsyn, 1925, p. 68.<br />
?Sublonsdalia Lisitsyn, 1925, p. 68.<br />
?Protolomdaleia Lang, Smith, and Thomas, 1940, p. 106.<br />
?Sublonsdaleia Lang, Smith, and Thomas, 1940, p. 128<br />
Type. species. - Cyathophyllum crenulare Phillips,<br />
1836, equals Erismatolithus Madreporites (jloriformis)<br />
Martin, 1809, equals Lonsdaleia floriformis (Martin).<br />
Lower Carboniferous, England.<br />
Diagnosis.-Cerioid Lonsdaleia.<br />
Discussion.-See Sando (1975, p. C20) for discussion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the type species and synonymic placement <strong>of</strong><br />
Stylidophyllum. Protolonsdalia (nomen vanum Protolonsdaleia)<br />
and Sublonsdalia (nomen vanum<br />
Sublonsdaleia) are both inadequately founded on type<br />
material that has been lost (N. P. Vasilyuk, oral commun.,<br />
1975); they may be junior synonyms <strong>of</strong> Actinocyathu.s,<br />
but neotypes need to be described before a<br />
final decision can be made.<br />
Lc•nsdaleia (Actinocyathus) berthiaumi (Merriam)<br />
Plate 20, figures 3, 4<br />
Lithostrotion(<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong>) berthiaumi Merriam, 1942, p. 378, pl.<br />
56, figs. 9, 10; Bassler, 1950, p. 252.<br />
Descript'ion <strong>of</strong> holotype.-See Merriam (1942).<br />
Discussion. -Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus) was<br />
previously represented· in North America by a single<br />
species, L. (A.) stelcki Nelson (1960, p. 119, pl. 23, figs.<br />
6-10), as determined by Sando (1975, p. C21). Nelson's<br />
species is restricted to the upper Visean and lower<br />
Nammian (Mamet Zones 16s, 17, and 18). Examination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the holotype (USNM 132988) and a topotype (USNM<br />
132989) <strong>of</strong> Merriam's species reveals that it is very<br />
similar to Nelson's species but differs in having fewer<br />
tabulae. New thin sections <strong>of</strong> Merriam's holotype<br />
(USNl\1 132988) are figured herein to provide a better<br />
basis for interpreting this specimen.<br />
Merriam (1942, p. 379) stated that the type material <strong>of</strong><br />
L. berthiaumi is from the Permian Coyote Butte Formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Oregon, a stratigraphic level that is inconsistent<br />
with other North American occurrences <strong>of</strong> the genus to<br />
which it is now assigned. According to E. C. Wilson<br />
(written commun., 1979), exposures in the type area are<br />
poor, geologic structure is complex, and beds in the area<br />
range from Devonian to Permian. I conclude that the<br />
specimens are probably from beds <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous (late<br />
Visean or early Namurian) age.<br />
lonscl.aleia (Actinocyathus) peratrovichensis (Armstrong)<br />
<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> peratrovichensis Armstrong, 1970a, p. 35, pl. 12,<br />
figs. 8-11.<br />
Description <strong>of</strong> holotype.- See Armstrong (1970a).<br />
Discussion.- Examination <strong>of</strong> the holotype (USNM<br />
160493) <strong>of</strong> L. peratrovichensis reveals a morphology<br />
consistent with Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus). The species<br />
differs from the widely distributed L. (A.) stelcki<br />
(Nelson) by its smaller corallite diameter, thicker corallite<br />
walls, fewer dissepiments, and tabulae <strong>of</strong> varying<br />
form, some <strong>of</strong> which are inclined upward toward the columella.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> L. (A.) peratrovichensis in beds <strong>of</strong> late<br />
Visean age: and the nature <strong>of</strong> its tabulae suggest that it<br />
is ancestral to L. (A.) stelcki.<br />
Family DURHAMINIDAE Minato and Kato, 1965<br />
Genus KLEOPATRINA McCutcheon and Wilson, 1963<br />
Ptolema'i..a McCutcheon and Wilson, 1961, p. 1020 (not Osborn, 1908,<br />
p. 267).<br />
Kleopatrina McCutcheon and Wilson, 1963, p. 299; Minato and Kato,<br />
1965, p. 67 (replacement name for Ptolemaia McCutcheon and<br />
Wilson).