27.12.2013 Views

Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS

Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS

Revision of Lithostrotionella - USGS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY 37<br />

Type species.-Thysanophyllum orientale Nicholson and<br />

Thomson, 1876, p. 150. Lower Carboniferous, Scotland.<br />

Discussion.- Thysanophyllum is distinguished by its<br />

cerioid corallum having corallites with a lonsdaleoid<br />

dissepimentarium and lacking an axial structure or having<br />

a weak impersistent axial plate. The genus is probably<br />

polyphyletic like other colonial rugose corals<br />

without a persistent axial structure, corals such as<br />

Diphyphyllum and Pseudodorlodotia.<br />

Thysanophyllum astraeiforme (W arran)<br />

Diphyphyllum aJJtraeiformis Warren, 1927, p. 44, pl. 3; figs. 2, 3.<br />

<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> aJJtraeiformis (Warren). Kelly, 1942, p. 352; Bamber,<br />

1961, p. 152, pl. 12, figs. 1a, b; Nelson, 1961, pl. 18, figs. 1-3.<br />

<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> (Thysarwphyllum) aJJtraeijormis (Warren). Nelson,<br />

1960, p. 115, pl. 22, figs. 7-10.<br />

Thysarwphyllum aJJtraeiforme (Warren). Bamber, 1966, p. 23, pl. 4,<br />

figs. 3a-b, 4a-c; Armstrong, 1970a, p. 37, pl. 11, figs. 5-8; 1970b,<br />

p. 28, pl. 9, figs. 1-6, text-fig. 33.<br />

Desc.-'ription <strong>of</strong> lectotype.- See Bamber (1966).<br />

Discussion.-This species is rather common in<br />

western Canada and Alaska, where it ranges from<br />

Mamet Zone 13 into 16i; it is most common in Mamet<br />

Zones 14 and 15. These occurrences are <strong>of</strong> middle and<br />

late Visean age. The structure <strong>of</strong> the columella, where<br />

present, suggests relationship to Acrocyathus.<br />

Genus LONSDALEIA McCoy, 1849<br />

Lonsdaleia McCoy, 1849, p. 11; Smith, 1916, p. 218; Hill, 1940, p. 151;<br />

Sando, 1975, p. C20.<br />

Type species. -Erismatolithus Madreporites<br />

(duplicatus) Martin, 1809, equals Lonsdaleia duplicata<br />

(Martin). Lower Carboniferous, England.<br />

Diagnosis.- See Cotton (1973, p. 117).<br />

Discussion.-The genus is subdivided into two<br />

subgenera on the basis <strong>of</strong> growth form: Lonsdaleia<br />

(Lonsdaleia), phaceloid, and Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus),<br />

cerioid.<br />

Subgenus ACTINOCYATHUS d'Orbigny, 1849<br />

Actinocyathus d'Orbigny, 1849a, p. 12.<br />

Stylidnphyllum de Fromentel, 1861, p. 316.<br />

?Protolomdalia Lisitsyn, 1925, p. 68.<br />

?Sublonsdalia Lisitsyn, 1925, p. 68.<br />

?Protolomdaleia Lang, Smith, and Thomas, 1940, p. 106.<br />

?Sublonsdaleia Lang, Smith, and Thomas, 1940, p. 128<br />

Type. species. - Cyathophyllum crenulare Phillips,<br />

1836, equals Erismatolithus Madreporites (jloriformis)<br />

Martin, 1809, equals Lonsdaleia floriformis (Martin).<br />

Lower Carboniferous, England.<br />

Diagnosis.-Cerioid Lonsdaleia.<br />

Discussion.-See Sando (1975, p. C20) for discussion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the type species and synonymic placement <strong>of</strong><br />

Stylidophyllum. Protolonsdalia (nomen vanum Protolonsdaleia)<br />

and Sublonsdalia (nomen vanum<br />

Sublonsdaleia) are both inadequately founded on type<br />

material that has been lost (N. P. Vasilyuk, oral commun.,<br />

1975); they may be junior synonyms <strong>of</strong> Actinocyathu.s,<br />

but neotypes need to be described before a<br />

final decision can be made.<br />

Lc•nsdaleia (Actinocyathus) berthiaumi (Merriam)<br />

Plate 20, figures 3, 4<br />

Lithostrotion(<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong>) berthiaumi Merriam, 1942, p. 378, pl.<br />

56, figs. 9, 10; Bassler, 1950, p. 252.<br />

Descript'ion <strong>of</strong> holotype.-See Merriam (1942).<br />

Discussion. -Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus) was<br />

previously represented· in North America by a single<br />

species, L. (A.) stelcki Nelson (1960, p. 119, pl. 23, figs.<br />

6-10), as determined by Sando (1975, p. C21). Nelson's<br />

species is restricted to the upper Visean and lower<br />

Nammian (Mamet Zones 16s, 17, and 18). Examination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the holotype (USNM 132988) and a topotype (USNM<br />

132989) <strong>of</strong> Merriam's species reveals that it is very<br />

similar to Nelson's species but differs in having fewer<br />

tabulae. New thin sections <strong>of</strong> Merriam's holotype<br />

(USNl\1 132988) are figured herein to provide a better<br />

basis for interpreting this specimen.<br />

Merriam (1942, p. 379) stated that the type material <strong>of</strong><br />

L. berthiaumi is from the Permian Coyote Butte Formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oregon, a stratigraphic level that is inconsistent<br />

with other North American occurrences <strong>of</strong> the genus to<br />

which it is now assigned. According to E. C. Wilson<br />

(written commun., 1979), exposures in the type area are<br />

poor, geologic structure is complex, and beds in the area<br />

range from Devonian to Permian. I conclude that the<br />

specimens are probably from beds <strong>of</strong> Carboniferous (late<br />

Visean or early Namurian) age.<br />

lonscl.aleia (Actinocyathus) peratrovichensis (Armstrong)<br />

<strong>Lithostrotionella</strong> peratrovichensis Armstrong, 1970a, p. 35, pl. 12,<br />

figs. 8-11.<br />

Description <strong>of</strong> holotype.- See Armstrong (1970a).<br />

Discussion.- Examination <strong>of</strong> the holotype (USNM<br />

160493) <strong>of</strong> L. peratrovichensis reveals a morphology<br />

consistent with Lonsdaleia (Actinocyathus). The species<br />

differs from the widely distributed L. (A.) stelcki<br />

(Nelson) by its smaller corallite diameter, thicker corallite<br />

walls, fewer dissepiments, and tabulae <strong>of</strong> varying<br />

form, some <strong>of</strong> which are inclined upward toward the columella.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> L. (A.) peratrovichensis in beds <strong>of</strong> late<br />

Visean age: and the nature <strong>of</strong> its tabulae suggest that it<br />

is ancestral to L. (A.) stelcki.<br />

Family DURHAMINIDAE Minato and Kato, 1965<br />

Genus KLEOPATRINA McCutcheon and Wilson, 1963<br />

Ptolema'i..a McCutcheon and Wilson, 1961, p. 1020 (not Osborn, 1908,<br />

p. 267).<br />

Kleopatrina McCutcheon and Wilson, 1963, p. 299; Minato and Kato,<br />

1965, p. 67 (replacement name for Ptolemaia McCutcheon and<br />

Wilson).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!