27.12.2013 Views

Law and Life: Leviticus 18.5 in the Literary Framework of ... - Clover

Law and Life: Leviticus 18.5 in the Literary Framework of ... - Clover

Law and Life: Leviticus 18.5 in the Literary Framework of ... - Clover

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

278 Journal for <strong>the</strong> Study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament 3 1.3 (2007)<br />

chs. 8-1 1, but <strong>the</strong>n returns <strong>in</strong> ch. 43. The 'dumbness' motif is pronounced<br />

<strong>in</strong> 3.22-27, reiterated <strong>in</strong> 24.26-27 <strong>and</strong> lifted <strong>in</strong> 33.22. The 'mounta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

Israel', which receive a prophecy <strong>of</strong>judgment <strong>in</strong> Ezek. 6.1-14, become a<br />

recurrent <strong>the</strong>me <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel's program <strong>of</strong> restoration <strong>in</strong> chs. 3348 (especially<br />

36.1-15).1° The watchman motif first announced <strong>in</strong> 3.17-21 is<br />

summarized once aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 33.1-9, as is <strong>the</strong> repentance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wicked man<br />

<strong>in</strong> 18.21-32 <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 33.10-20, thus creat<strong>in</strong>g an envelope to <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> book." All this shows that <strong>the</strong>re is a careful structure <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel<br />

marked by repetition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes to <strong>the</strong> extent that no part can be fully<br />

understood <strong>in</strong> isolation from <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> narrative.12 Therefore, as<br />

T. Boadt says, this 'forces <strong>the</strong> commentator to come to grips with <strong>the</strong><br />

planned unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present book as it st<strong>and</strong>s. No part can be simply set<br />

aside as extraneous <strong>and</strong> foreign to <strong>the</strong> concerns <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exilic prophet <strong>and</strong><br />

his pe~ple."~<br />

What scholars have not noticed, however, is that <strong>the</strong> language conta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lev. <strong>18.5</strong> allusions ('<strong>the</strong> person who does <strong>the</strong>se th<strong>in</strong>gs [<strong>the</strong><br />

statutes <strong>and</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ances] will live by <strong>the</strong>m') exhibits a similar phenomenon<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book. The priestly phrase <strong>of</strong>ten connected<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Leviticus</strong> allusion-that is, 'walk<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> my statutes <strong>and</strong> observ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

my judgmentsy--occurs frequently <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier oracle <strong>of</strong> judgment<br />

(5.6-7; 11.12,20) <strong>and</strong> displays a particular density <strong>in</strong> chs. 18 (vv. 9, 17,<br />

19; cf. 21) <strong>and</strong> 20 (vv. 11, 13, 18, 19,21; cf. 25). This formula does not<br />

occur aga<strong>in</strong> until 36.27, where God causes Israel to 'walk <strong>in</strong> my statutes<br />

<strong>and</strong> observe my judgments', <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong> 37.24, where <strong>the</strong> Davidic k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

enables Israel to 'walk <strong>in</strong> my statutes.. .' <strong>and</strong> so on. A similar trend is<br />

exhibited with Ezekiel's use <strong>of</strong> 'life' language. Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> verb 7'n, which<br />

is frequent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book (3.18,21; 13.19,22; 16.6), is most<br />

numerous <strong>in</strong> chs. 18 (vv. 9, 13, 17, 19,21,22,23,24,27,28,32) <strong>and</strong> 20<br />

(1 1, 13,21,25). The verb does not occur aga<strong>in</strong> until <strong>the</strong> transitional section<br />

33.10-20 (vv. 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 19) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry<br />

bones <strong>in</strong> 37.1-14. The significance <strong>of</strong> this framework is this: <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

composition connection between <strong>the</strong> unfulfilled 'statutes <strong>and</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ances'<br />

10. On this po<strong>in</strong>t, see T. Boadt, 'Rhetorical Strategies <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel's Oracles <strong>of</strong><br />

Judgment', <strong>in</strong> Lust (ed.), Ezekiel <strong>and</strong>His Book, pp. 182-200 (esp. 190-93).<br />

1 1. See M. Fishbane, 'S<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Judgment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Prophecies <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel', Inr 38 (1984),<br />

pp. 13 1-50 (1 32-33).<br />

12. As Rendtorff states: '[Nlicht nur Texte nach bestimmten Gesichtspunkten gesammelt<br />

worden s<strong>in</strong>d, sondern daR manche Texte schon im Blick auf den kompositorischen<br />

Zusammenhang formuliert worden s<strong>in</strong>d.. .' ('Ez 20 und 36,16ff, p. 263).<br />

13. Boadt, 'Rhetorical Strategies', p. 199.<br />

SPRINKLE <strong>Law</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Life</strong> 279<br />

<strong>in</strong> chs. 18 <strong>and</strong> 20 with <strong>the</strong>ir fulfilment <strong>in</strong> 36.25 <strong>and</strong> 37.24; likewise, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is a connection with <strong>the</strong> 'life' unatta<strong>in</strong>ed by Israel <strong>in</strong> chs. 18'20 <strong>and</strong> 33<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir new 'life' <strong>in</strong> 37.1-14. Here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dry bones, <strong>the</strong><br />

'life' language is vividly used once aga<strong>in</strong> (vv. 3,5,6,9,10,14) <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'life' that was anticipated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier portions <strong>of</strong> Ezekiel comes to<br />

dramatic fulfilment <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel 37 as God's brea<strong>the</strong>s 'life' <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> nation.<br />

Thus, as <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'glory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> LORD' receives a dramatic reversal<br />

<strong>in</strong> ch. 43, so I will argue that <strong>the</strong> covenant obligation marked by <strong>the</strong><br />

'statutes <strong>and</strong> judgments' formula, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong>, is clearly unfulfilled<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ezekiel 1-24 but receives a dramatic (or div<strong>in</strong>e) reversal <strong>in</strong><br />

Ezekiel 36-37, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> Lev. <strong>18.5</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> language <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong>,<br />

was used by <strong>the</strong> prophet to summarize <strong>the</strong>se covenant obligations. The<br />

general connection can been seen as follows:<br />

unfulfilled <strong>in</strong> Ezek. 5; 1 1 ;<br />

<strong>and</strong> especially 18; 20; cf.<br />

unfulfilled <strong>in</strong> Ezek. 18;<br />

20; 33<br />

fulfilled through div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

36.27 <strong>and</strong> 37.24<br />

through div<strong>in</strong>e causation<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ezek. 37.1-14<br />

The relationship between <strong>the</strong> 'statutes <strong>and</strong> judgments' formula <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

potential life <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong> is conveniently summarized <strong>in</strong> Lev. <strong>18.5</strong>, a text<br />

referred to explicitly <strong>in</strong> Ezekiel 20 <strong>and</strong> implicitly <strong>in</strong> ch. 18 (cf. 33.10-20).<br />

Thus, even where Lev. <strong>18.5</strong> is not directly referred to, it is probable that<br />

this text had some import on <strong>the</strong> both <strong>the</strong> 'life' language <strong>and</strong> 'statutes <strong>and</strong><br />

judgments' formula that occurs throughout <strong>the</strong> book.<br />

Statutes <strong>and</strong> Ord<strong>in</strong>ances <strong>in</strong> H <strong>and</strong> Ezekiel<br />

H conta<strong>in</strong>s many summary-like statements (e.g. 'walk <strong>in</strong> my statutes <strong>and</strong><br />

keep my judgments') that summarize <strong>the</strong> obligation for Israel to obey<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir covenant stipulations. For example:<br />

Lev. 18.3-5:<br />

...y ou shall not walk <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir statutes (D;r'ni)i731). You are to perform my<br />

judgments ('E39tUn) <strong>and</strong> keep my statutes ('npn), to walk <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m; I am<br />

Yahweh your God. So you shall keep my statutes ('npn) <strong>and</strong> my judgments<br />

('t39[tP3), by which a man may live if he does <strong>the</strong>m; I am Yahweh.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!