28.12.2013 Views

AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOCIATION BOARD OF ... - Press

AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOCIATION BOARD OF ... - Press

AMERICAN PAINT HORSE ASSOCIATION BOARD OF ... - Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Board of Director Minutes<br />

June, 2013<br />

deBarbanson was also present. The committee discussed 13 rule change proposals. Among those that were<br />

defeated were proposals to require show management to combine classes if one division is not a two-point<br />

class; changing the Amateur divisions to 19-49 and 50 & Older; changing the point requirements for Novice<br />

Amateur eligibility; and permitting the use of horses not owned by the Amateur in the Novice Amateur division.<br />

Rule change proposals passed by the committee for consideration at the 2014 Convention include: permitting<br />

amateur leasing in all zones, in addition to the original rule change proposal that would permit amateur leasing<br />

in international zones; providing awards for Limited Working Ranch Horse; changing reinstatement for Novice<br />

eligibility to allow 10 or more APHA or revalued points; making Novice Amateur Working Cow Horse a<br />

boxing-only class; requiring Amateur Walk-Trot exhibitors to choose which showmanship class in which they<br />

will exhibit at a show; adding Top 10 Amateur Walk-Trot year-end and zone awards; and allowing Amateur<br />

Walk-Trot exhibitors to show non-owned horses.<br />

Furthermore, the committee was in favor of offering Green classes at the World Show as well as creating a<br />

judging rules task force. Regarding Youth World Show qualifying, the committee agreed changes might be<br />

beneficial, but did not think it should be eliminated. They also were in favor of participation-licensing and the<br />

development of a task force for further consideration—they did not believe licensed horses should have<br />

breeding rights, and believe it should be offered only to horses age 4 and older.<br />

Breed Integrity & Registration Committee<br />

The committee meeting was attended by the following: Vice Chair Sharon Bonner-Brown, Fred Adam, Craig<br />

Burkhard, Jerry Cable, I. J. Carey, Paul Garrett, Gary Gordon, John Hayden, Merle Himle, Renee Robinson,<br />

Cathy Sasser, Jennifer Sheriff, Jana Simons, Marie Ternes, Lisa Westmorland, and Earnest Wilson. Committee<br />

members discussed the Executive Committee’s request for information on several topics. Although the<br />

committee understood some Youth had difficulty qualifying for the World Show due to weather and location of<br />

shows, they recommended qualifying rules remain the same.<br />

Next, the group discussed pros and cons of offering Green classes at the World Show. Cons included awarding<br />

a “World Champion Green …” title, which some believed didn’t make sense because the intent behind the<br />

classes was to provide a forum for Green horses to compete against other horses of the same skill level, not to<br />

provide an opportunity for another world championship. Pros included the fact that there is little difference in a<br />

“World Champion Green …” title than a “World Champion Novice …” title. In addition, members noted that<br />

the Green classes have been very successful and offering them at the World Show would be financially<br />

beneficial for both members and the association. After much discussion, the committee recommended the<br />

association adhere to the current Rule Book, which states Green classes are not intended be offered at the World<br />

Show.<br />

Regarding the Breeders’ Trust, the committee recommended exhibitors continue to be compensated for points<br />

and did not agree with a point cap. They requested clarification of the Executive Committee’s approval of a<br />

$100 fee on Breeders’ Trust horses over age 6 and of the expenses paid from the Breeders’ Trust revenue<br />

available for distribution.<br />

Billy Smith presented the concept of a participation-licensing program. The committee saw merit in exploring<br />

the possibilities of such a program, but did not see merit in defining a pathway to Regular Registry from a<br />

licensing program.<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!