29.12.2013 Views

Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...

Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...

Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ATSB – AR-2012-172<br />

Table 1: Aircraft models with reported stall <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong>, <strong>2008</strong> to 2012<br />

Aircraft model Number<br />

of stall<br />

warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

related<br />

reports 4<br />

Total<br />

rate per<br />

100,000<br />

hours 5<br />

Number of<br />

genu<strong>in</strong>e<br />

stick shaker<br />

activations 6<br />

Genu<strong>in</strong>e rate<br />

per 100,000<br />

hours 5<br />

Number of<br />

spurious stall<br />

<strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong><br />

(exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system<br />

Number of<br />

stall<br />

warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system<br />

failures<br />

System<br />

failure<br />

rate per<br />

100,000<br />

hours 5<br />

failures) 7<br />

Bombardier<br />

54 28.6 16 8.5 1 19 10.1<br />

DHC-8-300<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767-300 52 12.6 44 10.6 2 2 0.5<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-400 49 7.3 49 7.3 0 0 0<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-700<br />

32 1.7 22 1.2 2 7 0.4<br />

/ 800<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 717-200 18 10.7 14 8.3 0 4 2.4<br />

Fokker F100 13 24.9 1 1.9 0 12 23.0<br />

Bombardier<br />

8 3.8 3 1.4 0 5 2.4<br />

DHC-8-400<br />

(Q400)<br />

Embraer E-190 5 2.2 4 1.8 0 1 0.4<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-400 2 0.6 0 0 1 1 0.3<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-300 1 7.6 1 7.6 0 0 0<br />

Boe<strong>in</strong>g 777-300 2 2.3 2 2.3 0 0 0<br />

Airbus A320-200 3 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0.1<br />

ATR 42-300 1 3.5 1 3.5 0 0 0<br />

British<br />

1 4.4 1 4.4 0 0 0<br />

Aerospace BAe<br />

146 / Avro RJ<br />

Embraer E-170 1 1.4 0 0 0 1 1.4<br />

Airbus A330-300 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0 0<br />

Airbus A380-800 1 0.7 1 0.7 0 0 0<br />

Bombardier<br />

1 N/A 1 N/A 0 0 N/A<br />

DHC-8-200<br />

TOTAL 245 - 163 - 6 53 -<br />

<strong>Stall</strong> <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> <strong>in</strong> Australia between <strong>2008</strong> and 2012 were most commonly associated with<br />

Bombardier DHC-8-300, Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767-300, Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-400, and Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-700/800 <strong>aircraft</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se <strong>aircraft</strong> were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> 76 per cent of the stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related occurrences reported to the<br />

ATSB over this period, and 81 per cent of the genu<strong>in</strong>e stick shaker activations. When the fly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activity of each <strong>aircraft</strong> type over this 5 year period is considered, the Bombardier DHC-8-300 and<br />

Fokker 100, followed by Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767 and Boe<strong>in</strong>g 717, had the <strong>high</strong>est rate of stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related<br />

occurrences reported, each with over 10 occurrences per 100,000 hours flown. <strong>The</strong> Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767<br />

had the <strong>high</strong>est rate of genu<strong>in</strong>e stick shaker activations (10.6 per 100,000 hours flown).<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

All 245 stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related occurrences reported to the ATSB between <strong>2008</strong> and 2012. Includes stall warn<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

failures, many of which did not result <strong>in</strong> a stick shaker activation.<br />

De-identified domestic and <strong>in</strong>ternational hours flown (<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>aircraft</strong> only) by <strong>aircraft</strong> type <strong>in</strong>formation for the <strong>2008</strong> to<br />

2012 period provided by the Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport, and Regional Economics (BITRE).<br />

Only <strong>in</strong>cludes genu<strong>in</strong>e stall warn<strong>in</strong>g system activations (stick shaker or flight envelope protection). <strong>Stall</strong> warn<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

failures lead<strong>in</strong>g to one of these cockpit <strong>in</strong>dications are counted separately <strong>in</strong> this table.<br />

This column does not <strong>in</strong>clude the 23 stall <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> reported to the ATSB where it could not be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation reported whether a stick shaker/flight protection activation was genu<strong>in</strong>e or spurious. A rate is not provided<br />

due to the low numbers.<br />

› 10 ‹

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!