Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...
Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...
Stall warnings in high capacity aircraft: The Australian context 2008 ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ATSB – AR-2012-172<br />
Table 1: Aircraft models with reported stall <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong>, <strong>2008</strong> to 2012<br />
Aircraft model Number<br />
of stall<br />
warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
related<br />
reports 4<br />
Total<br />
rate per<br />
100,000<br />
hours 5<br />
Number of<br />
genu<strong>in</strong>e<br />
stick shaker<br />
activations 6<br />
Genu<strong>in</strong>e rate<br />
per 100,000<br />
hours 5<br />
Number of<br />
spurious stall<br />
<strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong><br />
(exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
system<br />
Number of<br />
stall<br />
warn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
system<br />
failures<br />
System<br />
failure<br />
rate per<br />
100,000<br />
hours 5<br />
failures) 7<br />
Bombardier<br />
54 28.6 16 8.5 1 19 10.1<br />
DHC-8-300<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767-300 52 12.6 44 10.6 2 2 0.5<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-400 49 7.3 49 7.3 0 0 0<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-700<br />
32 1.7 22 1.2 2 7 0.4<br />
/ 800<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 717-200 18 10.7 14 8.3 0 4 2.4<br />
Fokker F100 13 24.9 1 1.9 0 12 23.0<br />
Bombardier<br />
8 3.8 3 1.4 0 5 2.4<br />
DHC-8-400<br />
(Q400)<br />
Embraer E-190 5 2.2 4 1.8 0 1 0.4<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-400 2 0.6 0 0 1 1 0.3<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-300 1 7.6 1 7.6 0 0 0<br />
Boe<strong>in</strong>g 777-300 2 2.3 2 2.3 0 0 0<br />
Airbus A320-200 3 0.4 2 0.2 0 1 0.1<br />
ATR 42-300 1 3.5 1 3.5 0 0 0<br />
British<br />
1 4.4 1 4.4 0 0 0<br />
Aerospace BAe<br />
146 / Avro RJ<br />
Embraer E-170 1 1.4 0 0 0 1 1.4<br />
Airbus A330-300 1 0.2 1 0.2 0 0 0<br />
Airbus A380-800 1 0.7 1 0.7 0 0 0<br />
Bombardier<br />
1 N/A 1 N/A 0 0 N/A<br />
DHC-8-200<br />
TOTAL 245 - 163 - 6 53 -<br />
<strong>Stall</strong> <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> <strong>in</strong> Australia between <strong>2008</strong> and 2012 were most commonly associated with<br />
Bombardier DHC-8-300, Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767-300, Boe<strong>in</strong>g 747-400, and Boe<strong>in</strong>g 737-700/800 <strong>aircraft</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se <strong>aircraft</strong> were <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> 76 per cent of the stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related occurrences reported to the<br />
ATSB over this period, and 81 per cent of the genu<strong>in</strong>e stick shaker activations. When the fly<strong>in</strong>g<br />
activity of each <strong>aircraft</strong> type over this 5 year period is considered, the Bombardier DHC-8-300 and<br />
Fokker 100, followed by Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767 and Boe<strong>in</strong>g 717, had the <strong>high</strong>est rate of stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related<br />
occurrences reported, each with over 10 occurrences per 100,000 hours flown. <strong>The</strong> Boe<strong>in</strong>g 767<br />
had the <strong>high</strong>est rate of genu<strong>in</strong>e stick shaker activations (10.6 per 100,000 hours flown).<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
All 245 stall warn<strong>in</strong>g-related occurrences reported to the ATSB between <strong>2008</strong> and 2012. Includes stall warn<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
failures, many of which did not result <strong>in</strong> a stick shaker activation.<br />
De-identified domestic and <strong>in</strong>ternational hours flown (<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>aircraft</strong> only) by <strong>aircraft</strong> type <strong>in</strong>formation for the <strong>2008</strong> to<br />
2012 period provided by the Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport, and Regional Economics (BITRE).<br />
Only <strong>in</strong>cludes genu<strong>in</strong>e stall warn<strong>in</strong>g system activations (stick shaker or flight envelope protection). <strong>Stall</strong> warn<strong>in</strong>g system<br />
failures lead<strong>in</strong>g to one of these cockpit <strong>in</strong>dications are counted separately <strong>in</strong> this table.<br />
This column does not <strong>in</strong>clude the 23 stall <strong>warn<strong>in</strong>gs</strong> reported to the ATSB where it could not be determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation reported whether a stick shaker/flight protection activation was genu<strong>in</strong>e or spurious. A rate is not provided<br />
due to the low numbers.<br />
› 10 ‹