No Inner Core: An Introduction to the Doctrine of Anatta - BuddhaNet
No Inner Core: An Introduction to the Doctrine of Anatta - BuddhaNet
No Inner Core: An Introduction to the Doctrine of Anatta - BuddhaNet
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
somewhere else or in ano<strong>the</strong>r form such a thing as a<br />
horn <strong>of</strong> a rabbit? <strong>No</strong>. A horn <strong>of</strong> a rabbit is just a designation,<br />
an abstraction, without any corresponding reality.<br />
Similarly, Buddha <strong>of</strong>ten said, “This is not atta. That<br />
is not atta. <strong>No</strong>thing here is atta.” Does that indicate that<br />
Buddha means that <strong>the</strong>re exists somewhere something<br />
that can be called atta? <strong>No</strong>.<br />
I will conclude this section by explaining a very important<br />
statement found in Patisambhidàmagga 54 and in<br />
Majjhima Nikàya 55 : “Sabbe saïkhàrà aniccà; sabbe saïkhàrà<br />
dukkhà (not in M.N.); sabbe dhammà anattà.” The first<br />
sentence means, “All conditioned things are impermanent.”<br />
The second means, “All conditioned things are<br />
suffering.” The third sentence, however, is different.<br />
Here, Buddha does not use <strong>the</strong> word saïkhàrà, but He<br />
uses dhamma instead. Dhamma here means all things<br />
without exception. So <strong>the</strong> third sentence means, “All<br />
things, conditioned or unconditioned, are anattà, are<br />
void <strong>of</strong> self and soul.” This means that even Nibbàna,<br />
which is asaïkhata, unconditioned, is not atta or is void<br />
<strong>of</strong> atta. This statement unequivocally denies atta <strong>of</strong> any<br />
kind, even in Ultimate Truth and Enlightenment, even<br />
in Nibbàna.<br />
34