PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT OLD PANOLA ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Old Panola Mills Building Batesville, MS 6.0 INTERVIEWS Mr. Walter Huff, P.E. conducted the interviews. Summaries of the interviews are presented in the following sections. 6.1 Interview with Past and Present Owners/Managers The City of Batesville Street Department Superintendent, Mr. Teddy Austin, was interviewed the day of the site reconnaissance. Mr. Austin has worked for the City for approximately 16 years. Mr. Austin was not aware of any hazardous materials spills or releases at the property. On August 6, 2009, the Mayor of Batesville, Mr. Jerry Autrey, was interviewed by telephone. According to the mayor, an asbestos survey was conducted. Records from the MDEQ contained an August 5, 2003, asbestos report from Dickson and Associates, P.A. of Clarksdale, Mississippi, that indicated asbestos-containing material on the base flashing of the roofing area. On August 12, 2009, Mr. Phil Waldrup, former plant engineer, for Panola Mills a/k/a Union Underware Corp. was interviewed by telephone. He was not aware of any hazardous spills or releases at the property. He stated that the drains on the property led to the city sewer. He also stated there was one abandoned well on the property, which was decommissioned by concreting the well, and capping it off. Mr. Waldrup stated that the well was abandoned before he started working at Panola Mills in 1970. 6.2 Interview with Local Government Official Training Coordinator, Mr. Cowles Horton, of the Batesville Fire Department was interviewed the day of the reconnaissance, to provide information pertaining to hazardous materials responses associated with the Old Panola Mills Building. Mr. Horton reported that there was no record of any major spills or releases in the past two years. 7.0 FINDINGS Based on a review of available historic records, commercial development at the Old Panola Mills Building occurred around 1945. The property was unoccupied at the time of the site reconnaissance. The most recent tenant was reportedly Fruit of the Loom. The Old Panola Mills Building appeared on the UST and RCRA-CESQG environmental databases. Two USTs were removed and MDEQ issued a NFA action letter in August 1991. During the course of the Phase I ESA, we were not able to determine where the tanks were located on the property. Appearance on the RCRA-CESQG database was in connection with handling of ignitable hazardous wastes. 8.0 OPINIONS Based on site observations conducted on July 21, 2009, a review of reasonably ascertainable environmental records, interviews with City of Batesville personnel, reviewing applicable records, and development adjacent to the property, we did not identify any apparent recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Items of note, deemed to be de minimis conditions, included limited surface staining in the interior of the Old Panola Mills Building. It is our opinion that these de minimis conditions will not likely affect the property. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Neel-Schaffer, Inc. Page 8 Project No. NS.7705.001
Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Old Panola Mills Building Batesville, MS 9.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-05 and 40 CFR 312 “All Appropriate Inquiry” of the proposed razed-portion of the Old Panola Mills Building located at 137 Van Voris Street, Batesville, Mississippi. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 11.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no apparent evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. 10.0 DATA GAPS Reasonably ascertainable historical documentation at five-year intervals back to first development was not available. It is our opinion that this data gap did not affect our ability to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. 11.0 DEVIATIONS There were no deviations from the referenced practice. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Neel-Schaffer, Inc. Page 9 Project No. NS.7705.001
Page 1: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSME
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) FIGUR
Page 6 and 7: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessme
Page 16 and 17: FIGURES
Page 18 and 19: UST Vance St Van Voris Street Area
Page 20: APPENDIX A ASTM E 1527-05 Phase I E
Page 27 and 28: Panola Mills Building 137 Van Voris
Page 29 and 30: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of avail
Page 31 and 32: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State and tribal
Page 33 and 34: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 RCRA-CESQG site
Page 35 and 36: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or in
Page 37 and 38: EDR Inc.
Page 39 and 40: MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target
Page 41 and 42: Map ID Direction Distance Elevation
Page 63 and 64: GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA
Page 65 and 66:
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOUR
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
2 EDR Inc. 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEA
Page 117 and 118:
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEA
Page 119 and 120:
Panola Mills Building 137 Van Voris
Page 121 and 122:
Date EDR Searched Historical Source
Page 123 and 124:
INQUIRY #: 2534220.5 YEAR: 1977 = 7
Page 125 and 126:
INQUIRY #: 2534220.5 YEAR: 1985 = 1
Page 127 and 128:
INQUIRY #: 2534220.5 YEAR: 1996 = 7
Page 129 and 130:
INQUIRY #: 2534220.5 YEAR: 2006 = 6
Page 131 and 132:
EDR Property Tax Map Report Environ
Page 133 and 134:
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive
Page 135 and 136:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Envir
Page 137 and 138:
FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
Page 139 and 140:
FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRES
Page 141 and 142:
Certified Sanborn® Map Report 7/06
Page 143 and 144:
Sanborn Sheet Thumbnails This Certi
Page 145 and 146:
1932 Certified Sanborn Map 0B53-452
Page 147 and 148:
EDR Historical Topographic Map Repo
Page 149 and 150:
Historical Topographic Map N → TA
Page 151 and 152:
1. Adjoining property northeast of
Page 153 and 154:
5. Transformers on west side of sub
Page 155 and 156:
9. Floor tiles in subject property
Page 157:
Walter E. Huff, PE, BCEE Education
show all

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT OLD PANOLA ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?