31.12.2013 Views

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19a<br />

effluent limitations. EPA’s position was and<br />

continues to be that most rainfall runoff is<br />

more properly regulated under section 208 of<br />

the FWPCA [which does not require NPDES<br />

permits], whether or not the rainfall happens<br />

to collect before flowing into navigable waters.<br />

Agricultural and silvicultural runoff, as<br />

well as runoff from city streets, frequently<br />

flows into ditches or is collected in pipes before<br />

discharging into streams. EPA contends<br />

that most of these sources are nonpoint in<br />

nature and should not be covered by the<br />

NPDES permit program.<br />

40 Fed. Reg. 56932 (Dec. 5, 1975) (emphasis added).<br />

Two months later, in February 1976, EPA proposed<br />

a revised Silvicultural Rule and solicited public<br />

comment. EPA wrote,<br />

[T]he Agency has carefully examined the relationship<br />

between the NPDES permit program<br />

(which is designed to control and eliminate<br />

discharges of pollutants from discrete<br />

point sources) and water pollution from silvicultural<br />

activities (which tends to result from<br />

precipitation events). It has been determined<br />

that most water pollution related to silvicultural<br />

activities is nonpoint in nature.<br />

41 Fed. Reg. 6282 (Feb. 12, 1976).<br />

EPA continued:<br />

Those silvicultural activities which are<br />

specified in the regulations (rock crushing,<br />

gravel washing, log sorting and log storage<br />

facilities), and are thus point sources, are<br />

subject to the NPDES permit program. Only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!