31.12.2013 Views

63 an epigraphic account related to structure 4 at ... - Famsi

63 an epigraphic account related to structure 4 at ... - Famsi

63 an epigraphic account related to structure 4 at ... - Famsi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 3. Ground pl<strong>an</strong> of Structure 4, Machaquila, showing the area where the findings <strong>to</strong>ok place<br />

(not <strong>at</strong> scale).<br />

The archaeological interventions conducted in Structure 4 by the Sp<strong>an</strong>ish-<br />

Gu<strong>at</strong>emal<strong>an</strong> team would point <strong>to</strong> a novel altern<strong>at</strong>ive. In one of its l<strong>at</strong>est construction<br />

stages, Structure 4 was added a bench th<strong>at</strong> run across the back part of the building.<br />

This bench was masonry-built, with <strong>an</strong> outer front th<strong>at</strong> consisted of a layout of façade<br />

s<strong>to</strong>nes facing a core composed of old construction elements of the building, mortar,<br />

<strong>an</strong>d pebbles. On the front of the bench, in the section of the broad doorway <strong>an</strong>d as a<br />

decor<strong>at</strong>ive fe<strong>at</strong>ure, probably the different fragments with glyphs were displayed. The<br />

indic<strong>at</strong>ions in support of this possibility are varied:<br />

• In the first place, fragments of carved s<strong>to</strong>nes with hieroglyphs were found in<br />

the context of a controlled excav<strong>at</strong>ion –though not necessarily in a primary<br />

context- on the floor, <strong>at</strong> the foot of the limit of the central part of the bench.<br />

• In the second place, the shape of some of the fragments with rear tri<strong>an</strong>gular<br />

spikes, suggests they were conceived <strong>to</strong> be set in a core as part of a wall, in<br />

this case, the front wall of the bench.<br />

• In the third place, the bench fe<strong>at</strong>ures a remarkable degree of destruction in its<br />

central portion, suggesting th<strong>at</strong> the fragments may come precisely from th<strong>at</strong><br />

place.<br />

If, as suggested, the hieroglyphic fragments of Structure 4 were part of the front of a<br />

masonry bench, then, which was the original arr<strong>an</strong>gement? Some of the s<strong>to</strong>nes<br />

show a concave surface <strong>an</strong>d a tri<strong>an</strong>gular tenon, <strong>an</strong>d fe<strong>at</strong>ure groups of four th<strong>at</strong> form<br />

circular medallions. The five s<strong>to</strong>nes of this type documented by Graham (1967: Fig.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!