Jump processes in surface diffusion - Bilkent University - Faculty of ...
Jump processes in surface diffusion - Bilkent University - Faculty of ...
Jump processes in surface diffusion - Bilkent University - Faculty of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
54 G. Antczak, G. Ehrlich / Surface Science Reports 62 (2007) 39–61<br />
Fig. 43. Schematic <strong>of</strong> possible atom jumps on W(110) plane.<br />
Fig. 45. Displacement distribution <strong>of</strong> Pd adatom on W(110) plane at 210<br />
K [122]. Double/s<strong>in</strong>gle jump rate β/α is 0.12, δ y /α is 0.11.<br />
Fig. 44. Dependence <strong>of</strong> the diffusivity <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle Pd adatom on W(110) upon<br />
the reciprocal temperature [122]. Data corrected for edge effects as well as for<br />
migration dur<strong>in</strong>g transients.<br />
and horizontal jumps, which is huge. It has been possible to<br />
derive a significant energy difference between the two k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong><br />
jumps.<br />
Oh et al. [123] also exam<strong>in</strong>ed the self-<strong>diffusion</strong> <strong>of</strong> tungsten<br />
atoms on W(110), and surpris<strong>in</strong>gly found behaviour similar to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> palladium. At 365 K, the distribution yielded β/α =<br />
0.22, δ x /α = 0.36, and δ y /α = 0.43. Half <strong>of</strong> the transitions<br />
now were long jumps. Of particular <strong>in</strong>terest are the vertical δ y<br />
and horizontal δ x transitions. It is not yet clear how they take<br />
place, but they can be envisioned as start<strong>in</strong>g as jumps <strong>in</strong> the<br />
〈111〉 direction, which are then deviated either toward the x- or<br />
y-axis.<br />
Although long jumps had now been found for a variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> atoms <strong>in</strong> both one- and two-dimensional <strong>diffusion</strong>, noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
was known about the rates <strong>of</strong> these transitions. This matter<br />
was tackled by Antczak [124]. In 2004 she exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> detail<br />
the distribution <strong>of</strong> displacements <strong>of</strong> tungsten atoms on W(110)<br />
Fig. 46. Arrhenius plot for diffusivities <strong>of</strong> W atom on W(110) along 〈100〉 and<br />
〈110〉 direction [124]. Best fit is obta<strong>in</strong>ed with a straight l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
over a range <strong>of</strong> temperatures and with very good statistics <strong>of</strong><br />
1200 observations. From an Arrhenius plot <strong>of</strong> the diffusivities,<br />
<strong>in</strong> Fig. 46, she obta<strong>in</strong>ed straight l<strong>in</strong>es, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g a barrier<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.92 ± 0.02 eV for <strong>diffusion</strong> along 〈100〉 and much the<br />
same barrier <strong>of</strong> 0.93 ± 0.01 eV along 〈110〉. Aga<strong>in</strong> there<br />
were no <strong>in</strong>dications <strong>in</strong> the diffusivity <strong>of</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g to suggest<br />
contributions from long jumps. However, the distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
displacements at elevated temperatures clearly showed such<br />
transitions, as is evident from Fig. 47. It must be noted that at<br />
these high temperatures significant displacements occur dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the temperature rise before the <strong>diffusion</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval and dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
fall at the end. The distribution <strong>of</strong> displacements dur<strong>in</strong>g these<br />
temperature transients therefore has to be determ<strong>in</strong>ed and is<br />
also shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 47. The f<strong>in</strong>al rates were obta<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
relation<br />
r = Rt − r ot o<br />
t e<br />
(9)