12.01.2014 Views

Roque Tudesqui House - Historic Santa Fe Foundation

Roque Tudesqui House - Historic Santa Fe Foundation

Roque Tudesqui House - Historic Santa Fe Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Later the Justice ofthe Peace was prohibited from issuing orders<br />

against the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong> Water and Improvement Company by an Absolute<br />

Writ of Prohibition issued by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of<br />

New Mexico in 1886. This may have been the first indication that the<br />

water plan, if any, had not taken into consideration the existing water<br />

rights of downstream users.<br />

Stone Dam was replaced by Two Mile Dam in 1894. Less water<br />

left for the acequias. Granite Point Dam was completed in 1926. It left<br />

even less water for the acequias. Nichols Dam built in 1943 reduced the<br />

flow of water to a trickle, often in the spring.<br />

In 1947, Granite Dam was renamed McClure Dan and the total<br />

storage capacity for all three dams was raised to 4,121 acre feet, an<br />

increase of over 250 percent. With this large addition to the storage capacity<br />

of the water company, the year round flow of the river was essentially<br />

stopped. There was no provision for keeping at least a minimum<br />

flow in the river for duwnstream users with prior rights. There is little or no<br />

record of public input on any of the dams that have been built on the <strong>Santa</strong><br />

<strong>Fe</strong> River except through legal action, and this was generally after the fact.<br />

In the years between 1948 and 1990, numerous calls were made<br />

on the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) and later to the<br />

Sangre de Cristo Water Company, to release water to the Acequia Madre,<br />

but to no avail. PNM held the position that they had acquired all <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong><br />

acequia water rights under their permit from the State Engineer.<br />

In 1975, the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong> District Court issued an order directing the<br />

State Engineer to make a hydrographic survey of all claims to the use of<br />

waters of the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong> River stream system. This action is commonly<br />

known as Anaya vs. PNM. This study is the basis of the <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong> River<br />

adjudication which is still ongoing. Offers of judgment were made to over<br />

20 ofthe remaining users on the Acequia Madre. PNM still refused to<br />

recognize those rights and would not release water. This is when having<br />

already learned about persistence, the acequia would now start teaching<br />

us about litigation.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!