14.01.2014 Views

The Khazars and the Turks in the Ākām al-Marjān

The Khazars and the Turks in the Ākām al-Marjān

The Khazars and the Turks in the Ākām al-Marjān

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148 V. MINORSKY-<br />

Though <strong>the</strong> description of <strong>the</strong> " <strong>Turks</strong> " is very gener<strong>al</strong> <strong>and</strong> no<br />

tribes are dist<strong>in</strong>guished among <strong>the</strong>m, it is curious that <strong>the</strong> territory<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Toghuzghuz, <strong>the</strong> most celebrated of <strong>the</strong> Turkish tribes,' is said<br />

to lie to <strong>the</strong> east of, <strong>and</strong> consequently separate from, <strong>the</strong> " Turk "<br />

l<strong>and</strong>. <strong>The</strong> an<strong>al</strong>ysis of <strong>the</strong> text shows that what <strong>the</strong> author re<strong>al</strong>ly means<br />

by Turk is <strong>the</strong> particular tribe of Kimak (*Kimak),2 which lived near<br />

<strong>the</strong> Irtish, but, " when <strong>the</strong>re was peace between <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ghuz,"<br />

visited <strong>the</strong> latter's territory <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter, cf. Huditd <strong>al</strong>-'Alam, ? 18. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

periodic<strong>al</strong> movements are a source of great confusion <strong>in</strong> our sources<br />

<strong>in</strong> which two different territories are usu<strong>al</strong>ly telescoped <strong>in</strong>to one<br />

" Kimak l<strong>and</strong> ". <strong>The</strong>refore one might improve our Bahr <strong>al</strong>-shami<br />

<strong>in</strong>to Bahr <strong>al</strong>-Shash ('L.4). <strong>The</strong> latter term would be<br />

(CL[-)<br />

quite possible for <strong>the</strong> Ar<strong>al</strong> sea <strong>in</strong>to which disembogues " <strong>the</strong> Shash<br />

river " (Jaxartes), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ghuz territories are usu<strong>al</strong>ly associated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Ar<strong>al</strong> sea. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, Professor Codazzi's correction<br />

Bahr <strong>al</strong>-sham<strong>al</strong>i (3Lc ) "Nor<strong>the</strong>rn sea" has <strong>the</strong> advantage of<br />

suit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Huded <strong>al</strong>-'Alam, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which <strong>the</strong> Kimiik territories<br />

extended <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> north up to <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Un<strong>in</strong>habited L<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> river mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text belongs to <strong>the</strong> region between <strong>the</strong><br />

Irtish <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caspian Sea, of which Muslim authors (Mas'iidI, Mur7j,<br />

i, 213; Hudjid <strong>al</strong>-'Alam, ? 6, 41; Gardizi, 83) give very entangled<br />

descriptions. Our sources do not know <strong>the</strong> lower course of <strong>the</strong> Irtish :<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hudid <strong>al</strong>-'Alam takes <strong>the</strong> latter for an affluent of <strong>the</strong> Volga;<br />

moreover, <strong>the</strong> authors mentioned have a vague idea of <strong>the</strong> existence<br />

of some o<strong>the</strong>r river flow<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Caspian, to <strong>the</strong> west of <strong>the</strong><br />

Irtish. <strong>The</strong> Ur<strong>al</strong> (Yayiq) river <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Emba, disembogu<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong><br />

Caspian, <strong>the</strong> rivers of <strong>the</strong> steppes to <strong>the</strong> north-east of <strong>the</strong> Ar<strong>al</strong> sea<br />

(such as <strong>the</strong> Irghiz <strong>and</strong> Turghai), <strong>and</strong> even some left affluents of <strong>the</strong><br />

Irtish may be partly responsible for <strong>the</strong> confused descriptions of <strong>the</strong><br />

course of this second river. <strong>The</strong> new detail added by <strong>the</strong> Akam, namely<br />

that <strong>the</strong> river dries up <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> summer, po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>the</strong> steppe region.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two last paragraphs, which st<strong>and</strong> isolated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text of <strong>the</strong><br />

Akdm, refer to <strong>the</strong> north-eastern territories ly<strong>in</strong>g pretty close to each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> it would be strange if <strong>the</strong>ir description were due to two<br />

1 By Toghuzghuz Muslim writers mean both <strong>the</strong> tribes which orig<strong>in</strong><strong>al</strong>ly belonged<br />

to <strong>the</strong> ancient Turkish (<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Tu-ch'iteh) Empire, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> later Uyghur<br />

possessions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern T'ien-shan.<br />

2 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Idrisi (Jaubert), ii, 221, <strong>the</strong> Kimdkiya border on <strong>the</strong> Toghuzghuz <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> south, but <strong>the</strong> bear<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Muslim authors constantly vary up to 900.<br />

This content downloaded from 71.172.230.205 on Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:35:23 PM<br />

All use subject to JSTOR Terms <strong>and</strong> Conditions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!