14.01.2014 Views

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL Moshe H. Goshen-Gottstein Shemaryahu ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX<br />

Open and Closed Sections<br />

In the present edition sections in the Hebrew manuscripts were recorded in the apparatuses<br />

according to the type of the sources. In Apparatuses II and III the siglum § indicates an<br />

interval functioning as a marker of a new sense unit, without differentiating between types<br />

of intervals (i.e. whether “open” or “closed” sections, in masoretic terms). Such intervals<br />

were recorded only in instances in which there was no correspondence between ` and other<br />

manuscripts, that is when an interval was present in a manuscript but lacking in `, or when<br />

present in ` but lacking in a given manuscript.<br />

In Apparatus IV sections are treated differently, because the affiliation of a masoretic<br />

codex (e.g. to the Ben Asher tradition) depends – among other factors – on the (dis)agreement<br />

in reference to sections. Therefore in this apparatus sections were recorded with the<br />

indication “closed” (q) or “open” (t).<br />

The following table presents an overview of the material. It includes all intervals, specifying<br />

“open” and “closed” types, in all extant sources: Judean Desert scrolls, recorded in<br />

Apparatus II; the complete manuscripts and Geniza fragments, recorded in Apparatus III;<br />

and the manuscripts recorded in Apparatus IV. * As a rule, a blank cell indicates a lacuna in<br />

the manuscript, and means that it could not be determined whether a “closed” or “open”<br />

section is involved. Lack of a section is marked by the symbol > (or ].<br />

Corrections in section markings are indicated by the sigla used in apparatus IV: a single<br />

apostrophe marks the original or prima manus reading; a double apostrophe marks the corrected<br />

or secunda manus reading. Thus e.g. "t 'q means that the manuscript originally had<br />

a closed section, but later was corrected to an open section. Doubtful readings, which usually<br />

are due to the poor preservation of a manuscript, or cases in which the nature of the<br />

correction could not be defined, are marked by a question mark (?).<br />

The symbols used in the table:<br />

t<br />

dgezt dyxt<br />

open section (a blank interval, followed by a text at the beginning of a new line)<br />

q dnezq dyxt<br />

closed section (a blank interval in the middle of a line followed by a text)<br />

^ weqt rvn`a dwqt, a section within a verse<br />

' prima manus (before a correction)<br />

" secunda manus (after a correction)<br />

? dubious reading<br />

* The table of sections in MSS recorded in apparatus IV is justified to the right, like the apparatus itself.<br />

xlix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!