17.01.2014 Views

End depth in steeply sloping rough rectangular channels

End depth in steeply sloping rough rectangular channels

End depth in steeply sloping rough rectangular channels

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 Subhasish Dey<br />

and Rajaratnam et al (1976). Mathematical solutions of the <strong>rough</strong>ness effect on <strong>rectangular</strong><br />

and circular overfalls were put forward by Dey (1998) for mildly slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>channels</strong>. It is<br />

important to po<strong>in</strong>t out that most of the theoretical analyses of free overfall require an<br />

empirical pressure coefficient and a simplification based on the pseudo-uniform flow<br />

concept, where the frictional resistance is balanced by the component of gravity force <strong>in</strong><br />

positively slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>channels</strong>. This assumption is questionable when the frictional resistance<br />

is substantial. However, a theoretical solution has yet to be achieved for the <strong>rough</strong>ness<br />

effect on free overfall <strong>in</strong> <strong>steeply</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>rectangular</strong> <strong>channels</strong>.<br />

This paper presents a momentum approach based on the Bouss<strong>in</strong>esq assumption to<br />

analyse the <strong>rectangular</strong> overfall <strong>in</strong> <strong>steeply</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>rough</strong> <strong>rectangular</strong> <strong>channels</strong>. This method<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ates the need for an empirical pressure coefficient and the simplification based on the<br />

pseudo-uniform flow concept. The present study is an extension of the work of Dey<br />

(1998a) on <strong>steeply</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>rough</strong> <strong>rectangular</strong> <strong>channels</strong>.<br />

2. Govern<strong>in</strong>g equations<br />

The one-dimensional momentum equation between the sections at x ˆ L (upstream<br />

section hav<strong>in</strong>g hydrostatic pressure) and x ˆ x for a <strong>steeply</strong> slop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>rough</strong> <strong>rectangular</strong><br />

channel (figure 1) can be written as,<br />

P o P ‰F b Š xˆL<br />

xˆx ‡ W s<strong>in</strong> ˆ Q…V oV o †;<br />

…1†<br />

where P ˆ pressure force, F b ˆ frictional resistance, W ˆ gravity force of fluid between<br />

sections at x ˆ L and x ˆ x, ˆ <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ation of the channel bed with the horizontal, ˆ<br />

mass density of fluid, Q ˆ discharge, ˆ Bouss<strong>in</strong>esq coefficient, and V ˆ mean flow<br />

velocity. Subscript o refers to the section at x ˆ L . As varies from 1.01 to 1.12 <strong>in</strong><br />

straight <strong>channels</strong> (Chow 1959), for simplicity ˆ o ˆ 1 is assumed <strong>in</strong> this analysis.<br />

In a curvil<strong>in</strong>ear flow with constant vertical acceleration a y , the <strong>in</strong>tensity of pressure p at<br />

any <strong>depth</strong> y is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the <strong>in</strong>tegration of the Euler equation, that is<br />

@ @y … p ‡ gy† ˆ a y;<br />

…2†<br />

where g ˆ gravitational constant. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Bouss<strong>in</strong>esq theory, the curvature of<br />

streaml<strong>in</strong>e is assumed to vary l<strong>in</strong>early with <strong>depth</strong> (Jaeger 1957) ow<strong>in</strong>g to the small<br />

Figure 1.<br />

Def<strong>in</strong>ition sketch of a free overfall.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!