Leap of Faith: Israel's National Religious and the Israeli ... - ReliefWeb

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ............................................................................................... 22 A. Entering State Institutions: The IDF and Beyond ..................................................... 22 B. Joining the Likud ....................................................................................................... 23 C. Reawakening the National Religious Party ............................................................... 27 V. “Settling in Hearts” ........................................................................................................... 31 VI. The National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict ........................................... 33 A. Annexation: The National-Religious Alternative ...................................................... 33 B. The National Religious and the Two-State Solution ................................................. 37 1. Addressing national religious core interests ........................................................ 38 2. Consultation and Ratification .............................................................................. 41 3. Carefully preparing an evacuation ....................................................................... 43 VII. Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 45 APPENDICES A. Map of Israel ..................................................................................................................... 46 B. Map of Israeli Regional Councils in the Occupied Territories ......................................... 47 C. Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 48 D. About the International Crisis Group .............................................................................. 49 E. Crisis Group Reports and Briefings on the Middle East and North Africa since 2010 ... 50 F. Crisis Group Board of Trustees ........................................................................................ 52
International Crisis Group Middle East Report N°147 21 November 2013 Executive Summary Although the landscape of Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking might bear resemblance to that of a decade past, one change is unmistakable: the right is stronger within Israel and the national religious are stronger within the right. This has consequences, some already felt, whether in politics (the rise of Naftali Bennett’s Jewish Home); negotiations (Prime Minister Netanyahu’s commitment to submit any putative agreement to a popular referendum); or on the ground (the rise in confrontational tactics among some young West Bank settlers). Adjusting to this reality means neither ignoring the national-religious agenda nor surrendering to it. It means acknowledging its importance and understanding ideological nuances within it. If the goal is a peace agreement that garners maximum legitimacy, including among the national religious, attention will have to be paid to the substance of the deal, the way in which it is ratified and eventually implemented. Born in the early twentieth century, the national-religious movement represents the pairing of religion with modern political Zionism. In contrast to many religious Jews, its adherents – and notably followers of Rabbi Avraham Yitzhak HaCohen Kook, the first chief rabbi of the pre-1948 Jewish community in Mandatory Palestine – saw the emergence of a Jewish state, even a secular one, as a step in God’s plan. Kookists, by far the most influential among the national religious when it comes to devising policy toward the West Bank, hold the view that full redemption will come only when the entire People of Israel live in the Land of Israel under full Jewish sovereignty. Settlement construction, it follows, forms an intrinsic part of their project. On the face of it, these have been good years for the national religious. They enjoy unprecedented clout. Their numbers, roughly 6 to 8 per cent of the population, belie their outsized political influence. The Kookist stream in particular has invested in state institutions to mould them from within. Bennett’s party registered an impressive electoral showing. The governing Likud itself increasingly is shaped by the deliberate influx of national-religious members, which helped squeeze out more liberal voices from the party’s upper echelons. Kookists, again, have launched assertive campaigns to win the public’s hearts and minds. All in all, they have encountered success in shaping the national agenda, whether on domestic issues or in relations with the Palestinians. But these have been lean years as well. The greatest setback came with the 2005 disengagement from Gaza and parts of the northern West Bank, which the national religious were signally unable to prevent. The humiliating defeat had momentous consequences. It highlighted inherent tensions between the tasks of defending the Land of Israel, preserving the unity of its people and respecting the decisions of its state. In so doing, it exacerbated internal divisions over whether and to what extent one should respect – or resist – state decisions that run counter to core nationalreligious beliefs. The disengagement gave rise to a small albeit significant group of more radical, oftentimes violent and generally youthful settlers that condemns its elders’ purported sell-out. In this sense, the effort to amass power within state bodies and mainstream political parties coupled with public campaigns to convince others of the wisdom of its positions are signs of a national-religious camp both in full swing and in crisis – one that increasingly must choose between broader influence and ideological purity.
Page 1: Leap of Faith: Israel’s National
Page 5 and 6: Leap of Faith: Israel’s National
Page 53 and 54:
Leap of Faith: Israel’s National
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
show all

Leap of Faith: Israel's National Religious and the Israeli ... - ReliefWeb

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?