20.01.2014 Views

ICRISAT Archival Report 2010

ICRISAT Archival Report 2010

ICRISAT Archival Report 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

<strong>Archival</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

<strong>2010</strong>


Contents<br />

Project 1:<br />

Project 2:<br />

Project 3:<br />

Project 4:<br />

Project 5:<br />

Project 6:<br />

Project 7:<br />

Project 8:<br />

Project 9:<br />

Improving policies and facilitating institutional innovation, markets and impact<br />

to support the sustained reduction of poverty and hunger in the SAT<br />

Sustaining biodiversity of Sorghum, Pearl Millet, Small Millets, Groundnut,<br />

Pigeonpea and Chickpea for current and future generations<br />

Producing more and better food of the staple cereals and legumes of the west<br />

and Centra; African (WCA) SAT (sorghum, pearl millet and groundnut)<br />

through genetic improvement<br />

Producing more and better food from staple cereals (sorghum and<br />

millets) and legumes (groundnuts, chickpea and pigeonpea) at lower<br />

cost in the eastern and southern African (ESA) SAT through genetic<br />

improvement<br />

Producing more and better food at lower cost of staple cereal and legume<br />

hybrids in the Asian SAT (sorghum, pearl millet and pigeonpea) through<br />

genetic improvement<br />

Producing More and Better Food at Lower Cost of Stable Open-Pollinated<br />

Cereals and Legumes (Sorghum, Pigeonpea, Chickpea and Groundnut)<br />

Through Genetic Improvement in the Asian SAT<br />

Reducing Rural Poverty through Agricultural Diversification and<br />

merging Opportunities for High-Value Commodities and Products<br />

Poverty alleviation and sustainable management of water, land, livestock and<br />

forest resources, particularly at the desert margins of the Sahel and the drylands<br />

of ESA (SSA Desert Margins Program SWEP)<br />

The project has been terminated<br />

Poverty alleviation and sustainable management of land, water, livestock<br />

and forest resources through sustainable agro-ecological intensification in lowand<br />

high potential environments of the semi-arid tropics of Africa and Asia<br />

1<br />

62<br />

137<br />

173<br />

196<br />

250<br />

317<br />

338<br />

Project 10: Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics in SAT Asia and WCA 356<br />

Publications 364


<strong>ICRISAT</strong> <strong>Archival</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2010</strong><br />

MTP Project 1:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Improving policies and facilitating institutional innovation, markets and impact<br />

to support the sustained reduction of poverty and hunger in the SAT<br />

Cynthia Bantilan<br />

Project profile:<br />

This project is implemented in accordance with CGIAR System Priority 5 -- Improving policies and facilitating<br />

institutional innovation, markets and impact to support the sustained reduction of poverty and hunger. It<br />

specifically covers priorities 5A, 5B, 5C and 5D. This project provides the essential social science context for<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> research. Strategic assessments for agricultural and economic growth in the semi-arid tropics are<br />

vital. This project also focuses on mapping the complex development pathways and alternative livelihood<br />

options to help make critical interventions to address poverty, vulnerability, marginalization and social<br />

exclusion.<br />

Project 1 is coordinated through the Global Theme on Institutions, Markets, Policy and Impacts. The project<br />

implements social science and policy research at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> with focus on improving policies and facilitating<br />

institutional innovation, markets and impact to support the sustained reduction of poverty and hunger in the<br />

SAT. <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s social science and policy research thrust is to inform and provide strategic direction and<br />

prioritization of research issues within an IGNRM context and to provide appropriate capacity building. It<br />

scrutinizes the key driving factors influencing farmer to market linkages, optimal input and output options<br />

(including seed systems) and more effective policy and impact generation. Through social science and policy<br />

research, the Institute builds an enhanced capacity to help generate pro-poor policies, tools, lessons, and<br />

investment guidelines that contribute to improved food security, livelihood resilience and poverty reduction<br />

while protecting the environment of the production systems in the semi-arid tropics. As the poor faces a wide<br />

range of social and economic constraints, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> maintains a constant communication with them through<br />

village level studies to understand their needs and seek solutions. In this way, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> generates and shares<br />

vital information and analytical tools that provide a rational foundation for decisions that will benefit poor<br />

farmers and consumers.<br />

Objectives<br />

• Evaluate and develop alternative institutional arrangements and policy options for expanding<br />

access and utilization of new technologies and services for smallholder producers for greater<br />

impact of agricultural innovations on poverty and sustainable management of SAT agroecosystems<br />

(links to System Priority 5A)<br />

• Develop and promote strategies that enhance market access and competitiveness of dryland<br />

commodities for smallholder farmers and agro-enterprises and food safety for consumers (links to<br />

System Priority 5B)<br />

• Examine, develop and promote strategies for strengthening rural institutions and pro-poor<br />

institutional change to improve access of smallholders to markets and technologies and reducing<br />

vulnerability of livelihoods (links to System Priority 5C)<br />

• Analyze the effectiveness of agricultural and rural development strategies and identify<br />

development pathways and policies that facilitate poverty reduction and livelihood protection<br />

under chronic and transitory emergencies (links to System Priority 5D)<br />

In the MTP <strong>2010</strong>-2012, Project 1 targeted ten outputs to be achieved through social science research focusing on<br />

four research areas: (1) strategic assessments, (2) rural livelihoods and development pathways, (3) market<br />

studies, outlooks, and institutional innovations, and (4) research priority and impact assessment. The research<br />

area on strategic assessments seeks to identify major changes, emerging trends, driving factors influencing<br />

agricultural transformation in the SAT, and their implications for <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s longer-term research priorities and<br />

overall research strategy. Research in rural livelihoods and development pathways addresses issues related to<br />

poverty dynamics. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> is revitalizing its Village Level Studies (VLS) to track changes in rural poverty in<br />

rural household and village economies. Research in market studies, outlooks and institutional innovations draws<br />

lessons learned from market and institutional studies and prospects for SAT mandate crops, as well as conduct<br />

research on market linkages and commercialization for technology uptake. Finally, the focus on research<br />

priority and impact assessment studies is to continue to develop analytical methods for assessment of impacts,<br />

thereby strengthening institutional capacity for analyzing impact pathways within <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and among NARS,<br />

and provide technical backstopping for adoption and impact assessment research in the other Global Themes.<br />

1


GT-IMPI commenced several major projects classified under 4 research thrusts commencing 2008-09. These are<br />

mainstreamed in accordance with <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s strategic plan. Most are global projects covering South Asia, ESA<br />

and WCA and multi-disciplinary, undertaken in collaboration with the other <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Global Themes, namely<br />

GT- Crop Improvement, GT- Agroecosystems and KMS. These projects usually encompass more than one of<br />

the priority focal areas mentioned above. The major projects with GT-IMPI include<br />

• Village Level Studies:<br />

o Asia: Tracking rural poverty in village and household economies in south Asia funded by the<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in partnership with IRRI and NCAP<br />

o Sub-Saharan Africa: (Alastair Orr to give for ESA and Jupiter to give for WCA)<br />

o West Africa: Assessing the dynamics of poverty and land degradation in the Sahelian<br />

countries of West Africa from IDRC<br />

• Vulnerability and Climate Change<br />

o Asia: Climate Change: Vulnerability to Climate change: adaptation strategies and layers of<br />

resilience funded by the Asian Development Bank in partnership with national program<br />

partners in 7 countries of Asia namely India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, China, Sri Lanka,<br />

Thailand and Vietnam<br />

o Case Studies of Sustainable land and water management Approaches to Mitigate and Reduce<br />

Vulnerability to Climate Change in Sub-Saharan Africa: The case of the Tahoua Region in<br />

Niger<br />

• Targeting for improved crop productivity and delivery<br />

o Enhancing grain legumes’ productivity, and production and the incomes of poor farmers in<br />

drought-prone areas of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia funded by the Bill and Melinda<br />

Gates Foundation in partnership with IITA and CIAT<br />

o Harnessing the True Potential of Legumes: Economic and Knowledge Empowerment of Poor<br />

Rainfed Farmers in Asia” funded by IFAD<br />

o Programme for Integrated Innovations for Improving Legumes Productivity, Market Linkages<br />

and Risk Management in Eastern and Southern Africa” funded by IFAD<br />

o HOPE for the drylands – Cereals Project funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in<br />

partnership with<br />

• Strategic Assessments<br />

o <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Research spillover benefits in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa<br />

o IPG Potential of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> downstream research<br />

o Global Futures for Agriculture: Integrated modeling and scenario assessment for research<br />

evaluation<br />

Highlights for <strong>2010</strong><br />

Significant IPGs<br />

Publications that enhance knowledge of (1) constraints to adoption of improved legume varieties in ESA (2)<br />

markets and economic outlook for chickpea and groundnut in ESA (3) the role of legumes in livelihoods of<br />

resource-poor farmers in ESA.<br />

Outcomes and impacts achieved<br />

Socio-economists from Agricultural Research Institutes in Ethiopia have received training through the HOPE<br />

project on (1) design, pretest and implementation of baseline surveys to gauge adoption and impacts and<br />

(2) conduct value chain analysis and analyse market constraints and potential.<br />

Research partnerships developed with East African Grain Council, KARI, DRD and EIAR to develop shared<br />

research programme to understand the market potential for sorghum and millet in ESA.<br />

ESA socio-economics database was designed and protocols developed to create archive available to researchers<br />

in ESA region.<br />

2


Achievements in <strong>2010</strong><br />

MTP Output 1: Best innovative practices and mechanisms for harmonization and utilization of seed-related<br />

and biosafety regulations and policies suitable for the specific conditions of the SAT piloted, promoted and<br />

adopted with new knowledge shared with partners. [This output is shared regionally with projects 3 and 4]<br />

System Priority 5: Improving policies and facilitating institutional innovation to support sustainable reduction<br />

of poverty and hunger<br />

Priority 5A: Improving Science and Technology Policies and Institutions<br />

Priority 5A, Specific goal 3: Improving incentives for technology generation, access and use<br />

This research area is closely linked to that of Projects 3-6 but as a global generic policy issue it is felt it would<br />

be better to address it as a whole in Project 1 rather than to disarticulate it between 4 other projects.<br />

Project: Seed Policy Harmonization (SCOSA)<br />

MTP Output target in <strong>2010</strong> 1.1.1 Best practices for harmonization of seed-related regulations and policies<br />

suitable for the specific conditions of the ASARECA (<strong>2010</strong>) region promoted<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo, Malawi, Mauritius, Madagascar, Mozambique, Lesotho, Swaziland,<br />

South Africa, Tanzania, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Seed security is a precursor to food security because its availability and quality determine the potential to crop<br />

production and productivity. In the SADC region, however, good quality seed of improved varieties is not<br />

available, especially to small scale farmers who are responsible for ensuring household, national and regional<br />

food security.<br />

Main findings:<br />

This Project covered the entire SADC countries and worked with several partners—of national and international<br />

character, the main one being Iowa State University. The Project covered all the 15 countries pf SADC but in<br />

practice Seychelles has had no activities because the economy is not basically agriculture. This Project has been<br />

very rewarding in harmonization of variety evaluation, release and registration procedures, seed certification,<br />

phytosanitary measures as well as plant variety protection for the SADC region. Seed can now cross national<br />

boundaries with minimal hassle as the agreements on the aforementioned seed areas have received endorsement<br />

from the highest level of government. The Project was funded by USAID, Southern Africa Office. USAID is in<br />

the process of determining what should be the next set of priorities for the region in this field and at the moment<br />

there is a consulting firm going around the region to identify areas of high impact that will later, then, probably<br />

be funded.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Iowa State University, private sector seed Companies, National Seed Trade Associations in the SADC countries<br />

and the NARES of SADC<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

USAID project funding facilitated this activity at a funding level of US $ 350,000<br />

MTP Output 2: Ex-ante and ex-post impact studies conducted on representative <strong>ICRISAT</strong> NARS innovations<br />

for the SAT to enhance accountability and facilitate priority setting<br />

Priority 5A, Specific goal 5: Enhancing the structure, conduct and performance of knowledge-intensive<br />

institutions<br />

3


Intermediate Output target <strong>2010</strong>: Global Futures for Agriculture: Integrated Modeling and Scenario<br />

Assessment for Ex-ante Research Evaluation<br />

Output Target <strong>2010</strong>: <strong>Report</strong> on ICRSAT mandate crops/systems productivity and potential<br />

Background and Rationale: Rising incomes and globalization place unprecedented demands on agricultural<br />

systems around the world. Natural resource degradation and climate change pose global risks for food security<br />

and the environment. Enhancing the productivity and sustainability of agricultural systems is essential to<br />

improve the well-being of the developing world population and thus reduce poverty.<br />

The goal of this research is to deepen the understanding of complex linkages among socio-economic and<br />

environmental change, the functioning of agricultural systems and human well-being. The product will be a<br />

comprehensive modeling environment integrating socio-economic, bio-physical and technological responses<br />

that can simulate global, regional, and local consequences of policy changes and technology based investments.<br />

The model will provide a much improved platform upon which international organizations, agricultural research<br />

centers, development agencies, and national governments can base strategic planning and investment decisions.<br />

Achievement of output target:<br />

75%<br />

Literature review and documentation of promising technologies developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> were completed and<br />

initiated report drafting on “Dryland crops/systems research in a changing world”<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Global project<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, IFPRI, IRRI, CIMMYT, CIAT, CIP, ILRI<br />

Objectives:<br />

Compilation of relevant literature and report on <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crop system productivity and potential<br />

Methodology:<br />

To document promising technologies developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, a detailed review of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> annual report,<br />

publications from Global themes like crop improvement, biotechnology and agro ecosystem were carried out.<br />

To understand the current research activities at institute level and the targeting traits to improve the crop<br />

productivity in the changing environment and economic conditions, number of face to face interactions with the<br />

scientists was arranged. Finally to document the promising technologies developed in the last 3-5 years and<br />

promising technologies that are under development, a qualitative survey methodology namely Delphi technique<br />

was used.<br />

Data on biophysical and socio-economic variables for the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops are primarily obtained from<br />

existing data at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and from secondary sources such as FAOSTAT, published documents and various<br />

national reports. The secondary data comprised of aggregate data on global, regional and national production,<br />

yield, area, and data on export and import volumes and global and national price trends over years.<br />

The secondary data for <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops was also collected from situation and outlook reports prepared<br />

for other project like Tropical Legumes II and HOPE project.<br />

Progress / Results:<br />

Using the Delphi survey information, the promising technologies developed in the last 3-5 years and<br />

technologies under development or ready for dissemination in the next 5 years were documented for <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

mandate crops. The survey results shows that the research efforts is mainly concentrated in using advanced<br />

breeding and biotechnology methods in developing technologies to improve the yield potential of the mandate<br />

crops under the changing environment and economic conditions like climate change, new pest and diseases<br />

outbreak, higher fuel-fodder demand, marginal or problematic soils, etc. The survey also identified the potential<br />

or the advantage of the new technologies over the existing technologies, important targeted traits of the crops<br />

and targeted region for the new technologies.<br />

4


The list of promising technologies<br />

Pearl Millet Sorghum Groundnut Chickpea Pigeonpea<br />

• Drought tolerant • Sweet Sorghum S • Drought tolerant • Heat tolerant • ICPH 2671 –<br />

pearl millet hybrid 35 and NTJ 2 groundnut ICGV breeding lines hybrid based on<br />

HHB 67 Improved<br />

91114<br />

cytoplasmic male<br />

• Stay-green<br />

• Extra-large sterility (CMS)<br />

• Blast resistant sorghum variety S • ICGV 00350 seeded Kabuli system<br />

pearl millet hybrid<br />

HHB 146<br />

35<br />

breeding lines<br />

• Screening for salt<br />

/acid tolerant<br />

parental line<br />

• ICMV 221<br />

• ICMV 95490<br />

• Resistant cultivars<br />

for shoot fly, stem<br />

borer, sorghum<br />

midge<br />

• Super-early<br />

chickpea<br />

breeding lines<br />

• Helicoverpa<br />

resistant cultivar<br />

in chickpea<br />

• Helicoverpa<br />

resistant cultivar in<br />

pigeonpea<br />

These results were presented in the Virtual Crop Model workshop organized by IFPRI on 22-24 th October, <strong>2010</strong><br />

at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Hyderabad to discuss and select the important promising technologies to develop virtual crop<br />

model using DSSAT crop simulation model. The virtual crop model is used to generate relevant crop yield<br />

coefficients for the target regions to incorporate in the International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural<br />

Commodities and Trade (IMPACT) model to evaluate the ex-ante benefits of the technologies under different<br />

climate change and socio-economic scenarios.<br />

To undertake the research evaluation using the integrated modeling framework like IMPACT model, a series of<br />

training program was conducted in October, <strong>2010</strong> for the project partners on DSSAT crop growth model, Spatial<br />

crop modeling using HPC and advanced IMPACT model.<br />

Special project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.2.1 Early adoption studies on chick pea, pigeon pea and groundnut in selected<br />

countries<br />

ESA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Countries Involved: Ethiopia (Tropical Legumes II), Tanzania (Treasure Legumes), Malawi (Treasure<br />

Legumes/Tropical Legumes II)<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Identify scale and determinants of adoption of target legumes<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

In Ethiopia a combination of stratified and purposive sampling methods was used to select the three districts<br />

included in the survey in the project target areas, namely Gimbichu, Lume-Ejere and Minjar-Shenkora. These<br />

districts represent one of the major chickpea growing areas in the country where new varieties are beginning to<br />

be adopted by farmers. Eight kebeles from each of Gimbichu and Lume-Ejere districts and ten kebeles from<br />

Minjar-Shenkora district were randomly selected from where a random sample of 700 households was selected<br />

for detailed household survey. This include 400 households in the two districts (Minjar-Shenkora and<br />

Gimbichu) targeted under the TL-II project and 300 households in the one district (Lume-Ejere) selected for<br />

IFAD project. Village level data was also collected from about 40 villages that fall within the 26 kebeles.<br />

EIAR/DZARC took the lead for the baseline survey in Ethiopia. While the larger datasets help understand the<br />

5


oader production and market constraints for chickpea in Ethiopia, the data from the 400 households will be<br />

relevant in evaluating the adoption and impact of the TL-II project.<br />

A repeat survey for the same households was made in <strong>2010</strong>. Only 663 households could be interviewed, giving<br />

an attrition rate of about 5 %. The main reasons for attrition were refusal to be re-interviewed and missed<br />

identity of the household, where the identity of the household did not match that of the first survey.<br />

Table 1: Regional distribution of survey respondents<br />

Districts<br />

Total<br />

households<br />

(Number)<br />

Total<br />

Kebeles<br />

(Number)<br />

Sample<br />

Kebeles<br />

(Number)<br />

Sampled households<br />

(Number )<br />

2008 <strong>2010</strong><br />

Gimbichu 12,316 10 8 149 148<br />

Lume-Ejere 14,563 13 8 300 275<br />

Minjar-Shenkora 14,991 18 10 251 240<br />

All 41,870 41 26 700<br />

663<br />

In Malawi, the baseline survey had been conducted in 2008. A combination of stratified and purposive sampling<br />

methods had been used to select four districts (Chiradzulu, Thyolo, Balaka and Mchinji) that were included in<br />

the baseline survey. An early adoption / repeat survey was conducted in July-August <strong>2010</strong> in the same districts<br />

and the same households. This has led to the creation of a panel data for the sampled households. In each of the<br />

selected districts, during the baseline, the first stage in household selection involved the purposeful selection of<br />

the four largest groundnut-producing Sections (for the groundnut producing zones), or the four largest<br />

pigeonpea producing sections (for the pigeonpea producing districts). This led to the selection of four (4)<br />

sections in each district and consequently 16 sections for the study area. Second, a complete list of all the<br />

villages in each section was drawn with the help of the heads of Extension Planning Areas (EPA) and their staff.<br />

Three villages were randomly selected from each section. Third, a complete list of all farm families was then<br />

drawn for each of the randomly sampled villages. Thirteen farmers were randomly sampled from a list of farm<br />

families in each village. This led to the sampling of 594 households for the baseline household survey.<br />

In Tanzania, the data for the baseline had been collected by the International Crops Research Institute for the<br />

semi-Arid Tropics (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>), in collaboration with the Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) between<br />

November and December 2008. The data were collected through a household survey conducted in four key<br />

pigeonpea growing Districts in the Northern Zone: Kondoa, Karatu, Babati and Arumeru. In each District, three<br />

major pigeonpea growing Divisions were selected and two Wards sampled in each of the Divisions. Twenty five<br />

farmers were then randomly sampled from a list of farm families in each village and ward. A total of 613 farm<br />

households were surveyed using a standardized survey instrument administered by trained enumerators.<br />

An early adoption / repeat survey was conducted in October-November <strong>2010</strong> in the same districts and the same<br />

households which has led to the creation of a panel data for the sampled households. Data collected includes<br />

household composition and characteristics, land and non-land farm assets, livestock ownership, household<br />

membership in different rural institutions, farmer knowledge and cultivation of improved varieties, inputs used<br />

costs of production, yield data for different crop types, indicators of access to infrastructure, household market<br />

participation, household income sources and major consumption expenses.<br />

Main findings/Results:<br />

Data for Ethiopia was entered in SPSS for analysis. Due to the resignation of the lead scientist a consultant was<br />

hired to make the analysis and write the report for Ethiopia, which will be completed by February <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

analysis will use data for the 633 households for which we have panel data.<br />

Data from a repeat survey collected from Malawi was entered in SPSS for analysis. The analysis of the data has<br />

just begun and a report on early adoption and Impact will be completed by March <strong>2010</strong>. The analysis will use<br />

data for the households for which we have panel data. The data from Tanzania is not yet entered in SPSS as data<br />

collection will end on the 15 th of November <strong>2010</strong>. However, results based on the baseline data analysis indicate<br />

that there is significant potential for increasing the adoption of improved legume varieties in Eastern Africa.<br />

Lessons from this analysis showed that a critical constraint to the adoption of improved legume varieties was<br />

that farmers were not aware of these varieties. In Malawi, for example, where the overall adoption rate for<br />

improved pigeonpea varieties was 14 percent, while we estimated that, if all growers were aware, the adoption<br />

6


ate would be 41 percent. Hence, about one-third of the adoption gap (the difference between current adoption<br />

and potential adoption if farmers were fully aware) was explained simply by the fact that growers were ignorant<br />

about the existence of these new varieties. Similar results were found for groundnuts in Malawi, and pigeonpea<br />

in Tanzania, where the adoption gaps due to non-awareness were 12% and 34%, respectively. In Kenya the<br />

adoption gap of improved pigeonpea varieties due to non-awareness was 12%.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

Although there have been delays in conducting repeat surveys, we plan to complete data analysis and to write<br />

the report within the next 3 months.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Selian Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) in Tanzania<br />

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR)<br />

Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

WCA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Data collection, entry and descriptive statistics completed.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Assess the level of diffusion of improved technologies (groundnut varieties) and innovations in Tropical<br />

Legumes sites and identify constraints limiting the diffusion of technologies and innovation.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Data were collected from the Dosso region in Niger in the TLII project region. A total of 33 villages were<br />

surveyed of which 11 villages were purposely selected i.e. where participatory variety selection was undertaken<br />

and seed production initiated. Eleven villages were selected 10 km around the project villages and 10 other<br />

villages 40 km from the project villages. In each project village, 15 households were selected and in each nonproject<br />

village, 5 households were selected. Therefore a total of 275 households were interviewed. Questions<br />

focused on similar questions as in the baseline survey. Thus questions included modules on (1) socioeconomic<br />

and demographic profile of the HHs, (2) diffusion mechanisms pathways including knowledge of varieties and<br />

sources of first information and adoption and dis-adoption of groundnut varieties; (3) household land stocks,<br />

equipment and livestock ownership; (4) household access to credit, (5) utilization, consumption and<br />

commercialization of groundnut, (6) household market transactions, and (7) input and output groundnut plot data.<br />

During the lifetime of the project in the Dosso region, more than 250 tons of certified and 1000 tons of quality<br />

declared seed have been producers by individual seed producers and farmers’ associations in the Dosso region.<br />

More than 100 farmers have been trained in seed production technology and crop management practices and 30<br />

farmers have been trained in small-business skills and marketing.<br />

Main findings/results & policy Implications:<br />

Preliminary results showed that the area cultivated with groundnut has increased from 1.82 ha to 2.20 ha per<br />

household from 2007/08 to 2009/10. (1) the proportion of farmers exposed to modern groundnut varieties<br />

(developed or adapted less than 20 years ago) has increased from 11.78% to 78.83%. About 70.91% of<br />

households are planting new groundnut varieties in 2009/10 against 23.99% in 2007/08. The proportion of area<br />

planted with modern varieties more than doubled ie. from 21.85% in 2007/08 to 49.12% in 2009/10.<br />

The quantity of groundnut sold more than doubled ie. from 289 kg/household to 622kg/household. The<br />

proportion of households net sellers increased slightly from 91.30 to 93.77% in 2009/10. The average yields of<br />

farmers increased significantly from 26 to 52% for male farmers in the neighboring and control villages<br />

respectively. Women farmers increased groundnut yields from 28.90% to about 32.22% in neighboring villages<br />

and control villages respectively.<br />

7


Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The project is generating some social gains that will be largely increased after 3 more years on project<br />

intervention.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

The Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), the traditional extension services (DDA<br />

– Direction Départementale de l’Agriculture), farmer’s associations or group seed producers.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - Tropical Legumes-II (TL-II); IFAD<br />

MTP Output 3: Database and new methodologies addressing the impact of bio-physical and social science<br />

research developed<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.3.1 Impact pathways approach applied in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> planning and M&E process for<br />

enhancing relevance of R&D interventions in the SAT<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

for the Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (PMEP) of the SEED-WASA project and 75% of the<br />

PMEP of the AGRA Microdosing project<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger, Nigeria, Mali, Senegal and Ghana in the SEEDS-WASA project and Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso for<br />

the AGRA Microdosing project.<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To develop the monitoring and evaluation plan of the SEEDS – WASA project.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Both M&E were developed using impact pathways.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

None<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

The Institut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), The Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER) du<br />

Mali, the Institut National de l’Environnement et la Recherche Agricole (INERA) of Burkina Faso and the<br />

partners and stakeholders involved in the SEEDS-WASA project. University of Carl Pray.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for Seed Alliance Activities in Sub-Saharan Africa - Case of<br />

West Africa Seed Alliance" (YUSU40) funded by USAID<br />

“Achieving Pro-Poor Green Revolution in Drylands of Africa: Linking Fertilizer Microdosing with Input-Output Markets to Boost<br />

Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihoods in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger” funded by AGRA.<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.3.1: Updated impact database shared in the website<br />

Intermediate target output <strong>2010</strong> Impact database on guess-estimates on uptake of pearl millet, sorghum and<br />

groundnut varieties in 6 countries in West and Central Africa<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Burkina Faso and Chad.<br />

8


Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To gather information on varieties released in the 6 countries during the last 20 years, get guess-estimates on<br />

adoption by expert opinions in countries, and assess the strengths of the pearl millet, sorghum and breeding<br />

programs.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Questionnaires were addressed to experts in the 6 countries targeting the characteristics of varieties, expert<br />

estimates of area covered by varieties and the human resource availability in the 6 countries.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Preliminary results from expert survey showed that during the last 20 years, there have been few variety releases<br />

for pearl millet, sorghum and groundnut in WCASAT. In Chad, virtually no release in the last 20 years. This<br />

differs significantly by crop.<br />

It is noted that during the last 20 years, for pearl millet for example, no release has occurred in Senegal and<br />

Chad, Varieties released in Mali, Nigeria and Niger result from joint work between NARS and <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. The<br />

same observations can be made of sorghum. As for groundnut, all the releases occurring so far result from joint<br />

partnership between <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and NARS. However, efforts to release varieties remain a major constraint in the<br />

region because the rate of release is very low. In Senegal for example there has been few releases on groundnut<br />

through more than 10 varieties are ready for release.<br />

All countries a very weak to acceptable breeding programs. There is currently no pearl millet breeder in Niger or<br />

Chad, no groundnut breeder in Niger, Mali and Chad. Even in the countries endowed with breeders, they are<br />

splitted into many other cereals making their contributions often not high or they do not have the educational<br />

level necessary to run breeding programs. Overall, all breeding programs are constrained by operational costs<br />

even to maintain germplasm.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

All countries involved.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

DIVA project<br />

2011 1.3.2 New methodologies Impact evaluation methodologies tackling social processes and capacity<br />

building, along with lessons learnt from analysis of impact pathways developed and shared with national and<br />

sub-regional agricultural systems.<br />

Intermediate target output in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Kenya<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Determine ex post impact of improved groundnut and pigeonpea varieties on consumption poverty reduction.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

In Malawi, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Kenya, papers were written on determinants of technology adoption and the<br />

Impact of improved legumes on market surplus and poverty. The papers were based on household surveys<br />

conducted in the respective countries in 2007. A weakness of many studies that evaluate the impact of improved<br />

technology is that they do not control for differences between adopters and non-adopters. If these groups are<br />

significantly different, results may over-estimate impacts on farm income. To overcome this problem, the study<br />

used the propensity score matching (PSM) method to identify treatment and control groups with similar<br />

characteristics, except that one group (adopters) adopted new technology while the other (non-adopters) did not.<br />

The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke poverty indices were used to compare impact on poverty for the two groups while<br />

the quantity of groundnuts sold by the household was used to measure the extent of market integration my the<br />

household.<br />

9


However, by only controlling for the observable covariates the PSM only removes the part of the selection bias<br />

called “overt bias” (Lee, 2005; Rosenbaum, 2002). PSM may not remove what is called “hidden bias” which is<br />

caused by the unobservable covariates that may also affect the individual’s self-selection into the program and<br />

the outcomes indicators (Rosenbaum, 2002). . This warrants the estimation of the Local Average Treatment<br />

Effect (LATE) Abadie, 2003; Imbens and Angrist, 1994) as opposed to the Average Treatment Effect (ATE).<br />

The local average treatment effect (LATE), introduced by Imbens and Angrist (1994) identifies the causal<br />

effect of program participation on a restricted sub-sample of potential participants that can comply to the<br />

assignment as program participants. Consequently in Malawi the estimated the LATE as opposed to the ATE<br />

using parametric estimation procedures to assess the impact of improved groundnut adoption on market<br />

integration.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

In Malawi, adopters of improved groundnut technologies had higher consumption expenditure than nonadopters.<br />

After PSM matching to identify equivalent adopter and non-adopter groups, the results showed that<br />

groundnut adoption in Malawi positively and significantly increased household expenditure. The Incidence of<br />

poverty, depth of poverty, and severity of poverty were significantly lower among adopters. The findings<br />

suggest that by raising farm productivity improved groundnut technology can significantly contribute to poverty<br />

reduction. However, the Impact of cultivating improved pigeonpea was not significant. In Ethiopia,<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO),<br />

National Smallholder Farmers Association of Malawi (NASFAM)<br />

Intermediate target output in <strong>2010</strong>: Environment for Development Initiative<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Uganda<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Determine ex post impact of improved groundnut varieties to crop income poverty reduction.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The study was based on a random sample of 945 households from 7 districts, representing four farming systems,<br />

surveyed in 2006. A weakness of many studies that evaluate the impact of improved technology is that they do<br />

not control for differences between adopters and non-adopters. If these groups are significantly different, results<br />

may over-estimate impacts on farm income. To overcome this problem, the study used the propensity score<br />

matching (PSM) method to identify treatment and control groups with similar characteristics, except that one<br />

group (adopters) adopted new technology while the other (non-adopters) did not. The Foster-Greer-Thorbecke<br />

poverty indices were used to compare impact on poverty for the two groups.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Adopters of improved groundnut technology had higher incomes than non-adopters. After PSM matching to<br />

identify equivalent adopter and non-adopter groups, the results showed that groundnut adoption positively and<br />

significantly increased crop income. Incidence of poverty, depth of poverty, and severity of poverty were<br />

significantly lower among adopters. Although the effect on poverty indices was not dramatic, by raising farm<br />

productivity improved groundnut technology can significantly contribute to poverty reduction.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS), National Agricultural Research Organisation (NARO)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Swedish Cooperation Agency<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.3.3: Lessons learnt from analysis of impact pathways of representative <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

NARS technologies<br />

10


Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Development of hypotheses that will determine the IPG potential of<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s downstream work on technology development, testing and adaptation<br />

- Working paper published that covers review of the concept of IPGs and innovation systems including<br />

analysis of earlier adoption, constraints and impact studies.<br />

- Case studies on <strong>ICRISAT</strong> research, development and innovation pathways for participatory watershed<br />

management in Asia including spillovers to Africa.<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

90%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

The work plan covers three regional in-depth case studies (Asia, East and Southern Africa (ESA), and West and<br />

Central Africa (WCA)). The <strong>ICRISAT</strong> projects suggested include: a) development and deployment of the<br />

watershed-based approach in South Asia; b) seed supply systems in ESA; and c) fertilizer micro-dosing and<br />

African market Garden work in WCA.<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

This initiative emerged from the EPMR recommendation #5, i.e. “The Panel recommends that GT-IMPI work<br />

on the development of hypotheses that determine the IPG potential of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s downstream work on<br />

technology development, testing and adaptation.”<br />

With increasing focus on impacts and broader mandate of the CGIAR, and considering the weakening capacity<br />

of NARS in most developing countries, international agricultural research centers (IARCs) engage in research<br />

for development to address the range of issues facing the poor. Although development-oriented work is location<br />

specific, there is need to ensure that new knowledge is generated in line with the goal of producing IPGs that<br />

have wide applicability across countries. These IPGs may be developed by consciously developing indicators<br />

that assess how economic and social value can be extracted from knowledge and the processes by which this is<br />

achieved. This study reviews the concept of IPGs in the CGIAR and the global agricultural research community<br />

including an analysis of earlier <strong>ICRISAT</strong> adoption studies, constraints analysis and impact assessments.<br />

Synthesis of case studies will synthesize lessons learnt from past <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s downstream work and set the pace<br />

for embracing a culture of institutional learning and change.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The approach uses process documentation, institutional histories and impact pathway analysis to identify lessons<br />

and testable hypotheses that offer new insights to facilitate scaling up of technologies. It is complemented by the<br />

analysis of research spillovers (relating internationality and IPGs) across the Asia and sub-Saharan regions.<br />

Technical information relating to the research processes is elicited through wider dialogues among scientists<br />

across research themes and locations and with partners and target farmers to reconcile impact-oriented<br />

downstream work with the delivery of IPGs.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Analysis of discussions in various fora on the concept of IPGs indicates that balance between developmentoriented<br />

research and IPG delivery is still a contentious issue. However, a thorough examination of studies<br />

undertaken in the past including adoption studies, constraints analysis and impact assessments reveals that<br />

lessons of IPG value can be learnt from downstream work.<br />

Insights from study sites re-affirmed the fact that multi-stakeholder partnerships are important drivers in the<br />

research-development and adoption process of improved agricultural technologies. In Ethiopian, the<br />

government, EARI, development agencies especially Sasakawa Global and the private sector that<br />

commercialized the production of BBMs were key in sustaining the development and continuous adaptation and<br />

promotion of the BBF technology. Some of the drivers of uptake identified include: Problem orientation and<br />

identification of attractive entry point, promotion of technologies that favor the applicability of readily available<br />

inputs and systems, demonstrations of the technology package to risk averse farm households, consideration of<br />

attitudes and cultural practices at the local level, the role of leadership and champions, consistent support from<br />

the government, ownership of the research by contributing partners and proper co-ordination, multidisciplinary<br />

and common interest, stable financial support and accountability, strategies for scaling up and exit developed<br />

beforehand. In China, the pre-disposition of the farmers to work collectively has resulted in massive gains<br />

through adoption of crop and resource management technologies and diversification into vegetable production<br />

and marketing.<br />

11


Partner Institutions:<br />

Implementation of the case studies will be coordinated by GT-IMPI with the support of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Research<br />

Committee (all GTLs, Directors of ESA and WCA and the DDG).<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

DG’s Special Fund<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> –Literature review of Research Spillovers in Asia and Africa<br />

- Review of literature on research spillover benefits including the methodological approaches in<br />

determining quantitative estimates of research spillover benefits across targeted research zones<br />

- A short documentation for each selected <strong>ICRISAT</strong> innovation for systematic analysis of research<br />

spillovers<br />

- Database on key parameters validated for the estimation of research spillovers<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

The work plan covers regions of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> (Asia, East and Southern Africa (ESA), and West and Central Africa<br />

(WCA)). The introductory background and review process of this study include following projects: a) breeding<br />

programs of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops in Asia and Africa; b) participatory community watersheds in Asia and<br />

Africa; c) VASAT in Asia; d) technology transfer through institutional systems in Asia (CFC); e) fertilizer<br />

micro-dosing in Africa; f) integrated NRM - Sahelian Eco-Farm and African Market Garden in Africa; g)<br />

sustainable land management in Africa; h) nutrient management extension practices – mother-baby approach,<br />

farmer field schools, junior farmer field schools, organic matter (OM) management in Africa.<br />

Objectives/Rationale: This initiative emerged from the EPMR recommendation #3, i.e. “the Panel recommends<br />

that a thorough analysis of past and likely future research spillovers between Africa and Asia to guide <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

resource allocations between those two regions.” Panel was of the opinion that, a thorough analysis of the past<br />

and likely spillovers may be taken between Asia and SSA, starting with production statistics on an agroecological<br />

basis, which would help to inform priority setting for <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and its partners, and also help in<br />

allocating research resources between the two continents.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

- A thorough literature review has been used to identify focus technologies for analysis. Several key<br />

parameters have been collected for estimating transfers and spillover effects. Where necessary, socioeconomic<br />

surveys will be conducted across regions. GIS technologies have been used to renew<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> groundnut and sorghum domains in order to delineate transfers within the target domains and<br />

spillover effects outside the target domains. This will be done for the other technologies analyzed in<br />

later stages. To estimate spillover and transfer benefits several models and approaches (Davis et al.;<br />

Maredia et al. / DREAM model; Gravity model; Deb et al) are being reviewed and will be applied to<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> technologies. Finally, key findings will be synthesized and lessons will be drawn for the<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> research prioritization and resource allocations.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

- As a basis for the detailed analysis of transfers and spillover effects a short report on the dissemination<br />

system of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> research output was prepared. This included a complete documentation of<br />

groundnut and sorghum varieties released in more than one country as well as a brief review of the<br />

potential contribution of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> LSU.<br />

- A paper and poster on the generation of more systematically, more transparent and more relevant<br />

domains have been developed and presented at international conferences. They provide the basis for<br />

the delineation of transfers and spillover effects. Furthermore, the developed domains form the basis to<br />

the transferability of technologies which assist scientists in more efficient targeting and partnering in<br />

regions that are most likely to be suitable for a specific technology.<br />

- Collected review of literature on <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Spillovers research benefits in Inter-Regional Technology<br />

transfer in the SAT<br />

- Collection and development of database on key parameters for estimation of spillovers has been<br />

progressing.<br />

12


MTP Output 4: Current agricultural growth trends and future outlooks for the SAT analyzed and shared<br />

with key stakeholders<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.4.1: Global/Regional outlook (supply, demand, trade, prices) reports of<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To compile and document historical trends in the production, trade and consumption of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops<br />

and forecast future trends for India.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Compile and analyze secondary data and use the IMPACT WATER model developed in collaboration with<br />

IFPRI to forecast future trends in production, trade and consumption<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Groundnut:<br />

During the last two and a half decades, Asia’s production of groundnut grew at an impressive rate. Groundnut<br />

production increased at an annual rate of 3.1%, from 12.5 million t in 1981-83 to 24.0 million t in 2005-07. This<br />

increase, however, was not sufficient to meet the increasing demand for edible oils and oilcakes, forcing many<br />

countries, notably China and India, to import increasing quantities of the same. Yields of groundnut are lower in<br />

Asia than in developed countries because of a number of biotic and abiotic stresses, lack of access to quality<br />

inputs, improved technologies and information. More importantly, groundnut is grown in marginal<br />

environments characterized by poor soils, low and uncertain rainfall and poor irrigation infrastructure that<br />

restrict realization of their true potential.<br />

Only 5 percent of the world groundnut output is traded in the international market. Groundnut is traded as edible<br />

nuts, edible oil and oilcake meal, but edible nuts account for two-thirds of the total trade. Between 1993-95 and<br />

2003-05, trade in groundnut and groundnut products declined because of increasing food safety concerns over<br />

their contamination with aflatoxin. Asia is a net exporter of groundnut, but at the margins.<br />

Demand for groundnut is likely to remain buoyant in Asia, as the factors underlying demand growth (income<br />

growth and urbanization) have been quite robust in recent past in much of the Asia, and the trends therein are<br />

unlikely to subside in the near future. Demand for groundnut in 2020 is expected to be 1.6 times more than that<br />

in 2000. However, domestic production is unlikely to keep pace with increasing demand, and about half the<br />

demand in Asia will be met through imports. But bulk of imports will remain concentrated in China.<br />

Chickpea and Pigeonpea:<br />

Chickpea and Pigeonpea are important grain legumes and play a significant role in the food and nutrition<br />

security of the poor in developing countries of Asia. Together, these crops account for 41% of Asia’s pulses<br />

production. Asia accounts for 88% of global chickpea production and 90% of global pigeonpea production.<br />

Within Asia, India is the largest producer of both crops, accounting for 75% of Asia’s chickpea as well as<br />

pigeonpea production.<br />

Global yields of both chickpea and pigeonpea are low and have been relatively stagnant for much of the last two<br />

decades. India has a dominating influence on these trends owing to its large share in the global production of<br />

these crops. A number of biotic and abiotic factors limit realization of yield potential. The sluggish growth in<br />

chickpea and pigeonpea yields in India can be attributed to: (i) the shift in crop area from favorable to marginal<br />

environments; (ii) the slow uptake of improved varieties and other production technologies; and (iii) its<br />

cultivation on poor soils under erratic rainfall conditions.<br />

On the demand side, however, buoyed by increasing incomes in both Asia and Africa, demand for both the<br />

crops is set to increase in the medium term, doubling in Asia and Africa over the period 2000 to 2020. Trade in<br />

13


chickpea is relatively robust and has been growing over time. Close to 10% of the total chickpea produced in<br />

2003-05 entered the international market. For pigeonpea, Myanmar is a major exporter followed by Malawi,<br />

Kenya, Uganda and the Dominican Republic. International prices of both chickpea and pigeonpea declined in<br />

real terms until 2006. Since then, prices for both crops have increased in line with the general rise in prices of all<br />

agricultural commodities.<br />

Conclusion:<br />

Factors underlying demand growth in the recent past have been quite robust and these are unlikely to subside in<br />

the near future; indicating that demand for pulses, edible oils and oilcakes will continue to grow. Asia is land<br />

scarce; and the scope to bring additional area under cultivation of legumes is extremely limited. The main<br />

challenges for research and policy are to narrow down the yield gap by enhancing farmers’ access to quality<br />

inputs, improved technologies and practices and information; to enhance competitiveness of groundnut,<br />

chickpea and pigeonpea through domestic and border protection measures in relation to their substitutes and<br />

competing crops.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

SAU’s on TL II project<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) under Tropical Legumes II project and<br />

The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Mapping of target areas and crop production zones<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Ethiopia, Tanzania, Malawi<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Define major production areas and target areas for project.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Collection of official statistics.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Spatially disaggregated data for all the target crops was collected from all the three countries – chickpea<br />

(Ethiopia), groundnut and pigeonpea (Malawi) and groundnut and pigeonpea (Tanzania). Whereas information<br />

is available at the local level in areas or districts where project activities have started, such disaggregated data is<br />

not available at district and sub-district level for the country as a whole.<br />

We have initiated discussions with Harvest choice to see how the remaining gaps for the legume crops can be<br />

filled.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

EIAR (Ethiopia), DRD (Tanzania), Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (Malawi)<br />

Publications: Nil.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Situation and outlook analyses for targeted legumes<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Ethiopia, Tanzania, Malawi<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Analyse trends in production and trade to identify market potential for legume target crops in the region.<br />

14


Methodology/Approach:<br />

Descriptive statistics with FAOSTAT data and futures modeling using IMPACT (International Model for<br />

Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade) developed by IFPRI.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

<strong>Report</strong>s were produced for chickpea (Ethiopia), and groundnut and pigeonpea (Malawi). Results for Ethiopia<br />

suggest that chickpea area and production will show significant growth in the coming years. Results for<br />

groundnuts in Malawi revealed weaknesses in the current seed systems as well as in the enforcement of quality<br />

standards. The technology delivery and the grain marketing systems are underdeveloped, leading to the low use<br />

of improved technologies and the production of poor quality of nuts with high levels of aflatoxins that make it<br />

unacceptable in the international markets. Although the volumes of groundnut exports remain lower than the<br />

levels seen in the late 1980s, the review has shown that Malawi maintains a comparative advantage in groundnut<br />

production and competitiveness in exports suggesting that there is scope for increasing groundnut exports once<br />

required quality standards are met. Results for pigeonpea in Malawi show growth in harvested area, yield and<br />

production. Furthermore, the outlook analysis based on production and exports simulations shows that area,<br />

production as well as domestic demand will continue to rise. However, weaknesses in seed and technology<br />

delivery and grain marketing systems are constraints on diffusion and adoption of improved technologies.<br />

Policy implications: In Ethiopia, policy changes are needed to open up the seed sector and assist private seed<br />

companies and community seed producer associations by improving access to agri-business development<br />

services and empowering cooperatives and village agro-dealers. Performance of the chickpea value chain can be<br />

improved by strengthening farmer linkages with the industry and exporters, reducing transaction costs and<br />

targeting the development and distribution of large-seeded kabuli varieties that offer price premiums in<br />

international markets. In Malawi, the policy implications are similar and suggest the need for faster productivity<br />

enhancement, strengthening seed delivery systems to reach more farmers and the development of existing value<br />

chains.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

EIAR (Ethiopia), DRD (Tanzania), Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security (Malawi)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

All countries in West and Central Africa<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To assess regional groundnut supply and demand trends and market prospects in West and Central Africa.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

FAO data from 1961 to 2009 in addition to secondary literature were used to compute production, area, and<br />

yield levels as well as growth parameters. Using the same data set, demand for groundnut products (oils, cakes)<br />

are estimated and compared to competing products.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

West and Central Africa lost its world groundnut production and export shares during the last 4 decades.<br />

Groundnut production shares declined from 27% to 20% whereas groundnut oil export shares decreased from<br />

55% to 24%. China, the leading producer, has increased its world shares by fourfold from 10% to 38%.<br />

Argentina, the leading oil exporter, has doubled its world share from 12% to 23%. Senegal remains the lead<br />

groundnut oil exporter (19% of world exports) in West and Central Africa followed by Nigeria (1.20 % of<br />

World exports). India is the lead exporter of groundnut cakes accounting for 65% of world exports followed by<br />

a distant second Senegal with 10% and Argentina with 6%. Exports for confectionary groundnut increased by<br />

about 65% from 1979-81 to 2005-07 but most of this came from Asian countries accounting for about 47% of<br />

15


world exports. West Africa contribution to confectionary groundnut exports felt by half from 43,956 tons to<br />

27,495 tons from 1979-81 to 2005-07 respectively.<br />

The European Union still remain the major importer of oil, cakes and confectionary groundnut. France is the<br />

lead oil importer accounting for 23% of world oil imports followed by Italy 17% and the USA, 14%. As for<br />

cakes, China is major importer of groundnut cakes accounting for 35% of world imports, followed by France<br />

16% and Thailand, 11%. West and Central Africa are importing slightly more cakes. Whereas in 1961-65, there<br />

were no imports, this is increased to 2.54% of world imports.<br />

While imports from other oil seeds such as soya bean oils have more quadrupled (4.85% to 16.31%) in WCA,<br />

palm oil significantly decreased from 48 to 28% of Africa’s imports. The supply of palm oil has almost doubled<br />

while prices of these 2 oil seed are about half groundnut oil process in the global market making groundnut less<br />

competitive. However, since 1984, groundnut production in West and Central Africa has been increasing by<br />

about 4.60% annually mainly due to area expansion. Senegal and Nigeria remain among the largest world<br />

groundnut producers. Groundnut still remains a major source of employment, income and foreign exchange in<br />

many West and Central African countries. Therefore there is a need to reassess market prospects and highlights<br />

opportunities for West and Central Africa to regain to its market shares.<br />

The competitiveness of West and Central African groundnut in the domestic, regional and international markets<br />

has been limited by the low productivity, aflatoxin regulations, and stricter grades and standards in addition to<br />

trade distortions caused by 2 largest developing countries, India and China. Relative prices of groundnut oils are<br />

higher in the international markets making these products less competitive compared to oil palms, cotton oil and<br />

others oil fruits. There are market niches for confectionary groundnut. Access to this market would require<br />

knowledge of market requirements especially EU markets. To regain its competitiveness, groundnut<br />

productivity and production has to increase significantly, technologies to reduce aflatoxin contamination have to<br />

be promoted and grades and standards satisfied.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

The Institut d’Economie Rurale (IER) and the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique du Niger<br />

(INRAN)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - Tropical Legumes II.<br />

MTP Output 5: Investment and policy options for increasing agricultural productivity and mitigating climatic<br />

related shocks identified and shared with key stakeholders.<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.5.1 Policy options for increasing agricultural productivity to mitigate HIV<br />

susceptibility<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Results:<br />

This research was undertaken as part of PhD dissertation. The dissertation is completed and submitted to the<br />

University for review.<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.5.2 Constraints, challenges and opportunities for regional cooperation in R&D and<br />

alternative regional research and development strategies in southern Africa report<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Three SADC countries—Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia in terms of field research. However, when it comes<br />

to capacity strengthening and sharing of research results, 15 countries participate and benefit<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

ReSAKSS-SA ultimate goal is to contribute towards improving policy and strategic planning and<br />

implementation in the agricultural sector. Therefore the primary measure of its value lies in the extent to which<br />

16


policy makers use the information and analyses being generated. Specifically both CAADP and RISDP call for<br />

an annual growth rate of 6% in agricultural GDP if agriculture is to play a central role in economic growth,<br />

poverty reduction and food security in southern Africa. The overall objective of the Project is to provide<br />

governments and private sector with credible data and analysis that will enable them to make investment and<br />

policy decisions based on evidence.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

This is part of a consortium of SAKSS-Africa and ReSAKSS-SA covers only the southern Africa countries—<br />

mainly SADC. The first phase started in October 2006 to December 2009. The main countries of operation in<br />

terms of research focus were Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. However, the rest of the countries benefitted<br />

almost equally in capacity development. For the whole of <strong>2010</strong>, this Project in reality did not function. After the<br />

end of first phase in December 2009, there were several versions of proposals that were developed and<br />

submitted to the original donors of the Project as well as new ones. It is informed (no official letter yet) that<br />

some minimal funds are now available to continue with phase 2 of the project as we await more funds. It is<br />

unclear what role and at what level of effort will <strong>ICRISAT</strong> be requested to play a part in this. The clarity on role<br />

of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in phase 2 of ReSAKSS-SA is yet to be defined.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Universities in the region, International Universities such as Michigan State, National Policy Analysis think<br />

tanks, private sector, and NARS<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

The funding was obtained from three key donors—USAID, DFID and SIDA<br />

Intermediate target output <strong>2010</strong> Mozambique-SAKSS:<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

20%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mozambique<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The overall objective of is to provide Mozambique government and private sector with credible data and<br />

analysis that will enable them to make investment and policy decisions based on evidence.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

It first started as a pilot phase for 18 months –2008 to 2009 and late in 2009, a more detailed and longer program<br />

lasting for three years began. There are three CGIAR centers implementing this program—IFPRI with fiduciary<br />

responsibility in reporting and finance, IWMI and <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. The main implementing year for this project has<br />

been <strong>2010</strong>.This project continues through December 2011 and it has a high probability of extension into a<br />

second phase.<br />

Main findings/Results:<br />

This is a capacity building project for the Ministry of Agriculture which is implemented mainly through its<br />

Department of Economics. This is an off shoot of the Regional SAKSS but now only for Mozambique. SIDA<br />

got interested in supporting a Mozambique country-based SAKSS after seeing the results of the regional SAKSS<br />

and the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Team comprising John Dimes, Kizito Mazvimavi and Isaac Minde have been implementing<br />

the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> part of the program with Mozambican counterparts. The <strong>ICRISAT</strong>s agenda in the project is on<br />

Expanding Input and Output Markets and this is divided into three key components as agreed upon jointly by<br />

the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and the Mozambican team.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Universities in the region, National Policy Analysis think tanks, private sector, and NARS<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

SIDA<br />

17


MTP Output target 2011 1.5.1 Adaptation strategies and layers of resilience to climatic related shocks in Asia<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Review Visits and Annual Planning Meetings<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

90%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The overall objective of the project is to identify and prioritize the sectors most at risk and develop gender<br />

equitable agricultural adaptation and mitigation strategies as an integral part of agricultural development in the<br />

most vulnerable areas.<br />

Expected outputs from the project are:<br />

• Improved understanding of climate variability and adaptation-coping strategies of the rural poor in<br />

SAT region<br />

• Best practices and institutional innovations for mitigating the effects of climate change<br />

• Strategies to address socioeconomic problems relating to changing weather patterns and availability of<br />

a range of initiatives for their alleviation<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The project had review visits to all partner countries along with the Annual Planning and Review Meeting in<br />

May, <strong>2010</strong>. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> organized the Second Annual Planning and Review Meeting of the project Vulnerability<br />

to climate change: adaptation strategies and layers of resilience on 3 and 4 May, followed by an International<br />

Policy Dialogue hosted by Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD) on “Building Climate Resilient Agriculture in<br />

Asia” on 5 and 6 May in Dhaka, Bangladesh.<br />

At the review meeting, the project was described as an opportunity for all partner countries to empower the<br />

people to use the layers of resilience along with empowerment of the key stakeholders. The Steering Committee<br />

members of the project, emphasized the need for using past experiences of the farming community and tracking<br />

changes in the grassroots across seven countries: India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, China, Thailand and<br />

Pakistan. This was followed by country-wise presentation of progress reports.<br />

The review focused on a range of topics from climatic data analysis, variability and change, vulnerability<br />

analysis and insights from the field on farmers’ perception to climate change and their adaptation strategies. The<br />

review ended with the discussion on progress of activities as per the work plan. Timelines were revisited and<br />

established for the other activities in <strong>2010</strong>-2011.<br />

The Policy Dialogue, held from 5-6 May, saw the who’s who of policy and planning of Bangladesh share a<br />

common platform with the research community across seven countries led by CPD and <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Uttam Deb,<br />

Research Head of CPD and Project Collaborator from Bangladesh was a key player in conducting the event.<br />

Mustafizur Rahman, Executive Director of CPD, Rehman Sobhan, Chairman of CPD, AMM Shawkat Ali,<br />

Former Adviser to the Caretaker Government and Begum Matia Chowdhury, Agriculture Minister of<br />

Bangladesh, spoke on the occasion. The closing session was chaired by M Syeduzzaman, former Finance<br />

Secretary of Bangladesh and attended by Members of Parliament. MCS Bantilan presented the synthesis of the<br />

two-day dialogue in this session.<br />

Further, during 10 – 14 October, <strong>2010</strong> and later during 22 November to 06 December <strong>2010</strong>, review visits were<br />

undertaken in Bangkok, Thailand, Guiyang (Guizhou Province), China, Hanoi Vietnam and ADB, Manila,<br />

Philippines by MCS Bantilan, Naveen P Singh, Prabhakar Pathak and Kamanda Josey. The reviews centered on<br />

follow-up on the application of integrated watershed management concept in the previous ADB RETA 5812 and<br />

6067 “Participatory Watershed Management for Reducing Rural Poverty and land Degradation in SAT Asia” to<br />

a) draw lessons from <strong>ICRISAT</strong> development research initiatives and measure the spillover research benefits<br />

across regions. This feature also addresses the 6th EPMR recommendations 3 and 5; and b) identify technology,<br />

cultural and social dimensions influencing viable strategies for enhancing resilience and adaptation to increasing<br />

water scarcity and climatic variability in the village sites. An invited seminar was also delivered at the Asian<br />

Development Bank Headquarters in Manila entitled “Building Resilient Agriculture in Asia: Lessons from<br />

Cross-Country Studies” to show case the initial findings and discuss the future work plans and activities. During<br />

18


ADB feedback, it was reiterated to extend the project for another six month, which was acceded to with ADB<br />

emphasizing on more policy level interactions so that the findings can be mainstreamed in the government<br />

programmes in the partner countries.<br />

The salient features of the review mission were as under:<br />

Thailand: Project partners from participating departments of the Field Crops Research Institute of DoA,<br />

Thailand presented three project reports covering vulnerability analysis, climatic analysis (national, district and<br />

village levels) and farmer perceptions to climate change and adaptation strategies. Research gaps were identified<br />

and workplan for next year was finalized with focus of dissemination of results through development of policy<br />

briefs, stakeholders’ meeting and policy dialogue.<br />

In a tour of Northeastern Thailand, it was observed through focus group meetings (FGMs) that farmers do not<br />

put high priority in planning for the long term even as they are increasingly aware of climate-related changes.<br />

They emphasize concerns and priority in the short-term, addressing the conditions faced during each season<br />

each year. When asked about any practice(s) that they perceive will improve their resilience to climate change,<br />

those exposed to government forestry programs mentioned their community involvement in afforestation. Two<br />

factors – community group action and leadership were highlighted during the FGMs as essential to improve<br />

resiliency to increasing climate variability, and even extreme events (drought, flood). Recognition of the role of<br />

women was also highlighted: two women - one a member of the village committee and the other a leader of the<br />

women self-help group - contributed points with priorities to reducing household cost through training in<br />

agricultural practices and collective action (e.g. bio-extracts and household detergents to reduce the use of<br />

pesticides in their vegetables.)<br />

China: The project review in China included field visits in two villages in Guizhou Province: Lucheba Village<br />

in Pingba County and Yingzhai Village near Guiyang. In Lucheba village, access to water for irrigation and<br />

drinking water (introduced through the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> watershed concept in earlier ADB RETA) has opened greater<br />

opportunities for agricultural innovations in the village which benefited the households of this agriculture-based<br />

community. Since the initiation of the first <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-GAAS participatory watershed projects funded by ADB in<br />

RETA 6067, there have been significant developments. Six farmer groups were organized, each electing a<br />

committee to plan and execute projects depending on the farmer group’s priorities; and additional support from<br />

the Chinese government also augmented the initiative. Most importantly, farmers achieved a sense of ownership<br />

by virtue of the fact that they also contribute to the community project implementation funds, and this has been<br />

critical in ensuring the project’s sustainability even beyond the project horizon. The average farmer income has<br />

increased from about ¥1800 per person in 2002 to nearly ¥6000. Neighboring villages are following to replicate<br />

the Lucheba model and the village has evolved to become a market center for vegetables. The discussion with<br />

farmers during this visit revealed villagers’ emerging realization and higher priority for better roads and faster<br />

access to markets, as well as new innovations to sustain the benefits from market-driven agricultural<br />

diversification. The visit of Yingzhai Village near Guiyang gave an additional exposure to the review team of<br />

other initiatives in rural Guizhou. The advances in technology adoption (biogas, waste water treatment, solar<br />

lighting and insect traps for IPM) were definitely sustained through participation of village collectives with<br />

sustained government support.<br />

Like the other country project reviews, partners from GAAS presented their progress reports, primarily on<br />

analysis of long-term climate data, and farmers’ perceptions on climate change. Review comments were<br />

discussed with specific recommendations given for each project report.<br />

Vietnam: In Vietnam, the project review team saw presentations by three groups of partners from VAAS, each<br />

working on the three components: macro and micro climatic analysis, vulnerability analysis, and farmers’<br />

perceptions and adaptation strategies. The change in climate was observed in terms of increasing incidences of<br />

extreme events like droughts and floods, the latter being of greater concern especially in South Central Province<br />

of Vietnam. Sea water intrusion has resulted in soil salinity at the coastal areas due to sea level rise and<br />

reduction in water levels in the river basins. The water table has also gone down drastically and these changes<br />

seem to have impacted the crop calendar. Additionally, it was perceived by farmers that the number of winter<br />

days has seemingly drastically reduced in the last 40 years. Specific to the queries relating to watersheds, it was<br />

informed that due to lack of maintenance, silt accumulation is increasingly a problem in watershed villages and<br />

hence some check measures needed to be adopted in the upper portions of the watershed in Huoang Dao.<br />

19


Philippines: Dr. Bantilan delivered an invited seminar on “Building Climate Resilient Agriculture in Asia:<br />

Lessons from Cross-Country Studies” on 3 Dec <strong>2010</strong> at ADB Headquarters in Manila. The seminar addressed<br />

cross-country perspectives and farmers’ adaptive capacity to change. It was well received with good feedback<br />

especially on the key contribution of the project in drawing insights from the grassroots level through village<br />

level studies. Key results were recommended for high level dissemination at the national and international<br />

levels. Development of a book for publication that will synthesize the key lessons learned from the project was<br />

set as priority. ADB further reiterated the targeting of global fora wherein outreach for policy dialogue can be<br />

made highlighting the grass root level adaptations in the south and southeast Asia.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The review team discussed the preliminary results emanating from the project and made suggestions for the<br />

enrichment of the reports. The way forward and next steps to be undertaken were finalized in each countries.<br />

Thailand: The results will be strengthened by matching the key findings from climatic and vulnerability<br />

analysis with the farm level observations and assessment of adaptation strategies in response to perceived<br />

increase in climate variability. The Thai team will prepare for stakeholder consultations and policy dialogue<br />

during February-April, 2011.<br />

Vietnam: Apart from similar recommendation given above, it was felt necessary to properly link the LGP<br />

analysis with the changes in cropping pattern and the conclusions of the farmers perception survey be linked to<br />

data and empirical observations (like rainfall changes, higher peaks, short run period, shorter rainfall season and<br />

longer dry season to name a few). The work will need to be enhanced by downscaling the HADCM3 scenario<br />

for the SCC region/ Ninh Thuan Province for rice, groundnut, soybean, maize and cassava crop.<br />

China: Lengthy discussion was pursued to address the research issues and specific critical technical suggestions<br />

to improve the current versions of the project reports. The analysis of vulnerability in the targeted research<br />

domain has not been completed. The team was advised to take steps to complete this project component as well.<br />

It was suggested to complement ongoing crop modeling with efforts in modeling at a watershed scale. In<br />

addition, it was advised that analysis be enhanced by identifying the enabling factors as well as constraints to<br />

adaptation.<br />

Like the other teams participating in the ADB project, the team from China was also encouraged to commence<br />

early preparations for the planned stakeholder consultations and policy dialogues to be held in Guiyang in 2011.<br />

It is important for <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to also take up the points noted by the President of GAAS, Prof. Zuo-yi Liu as he<br />

expressed the value of partnership with <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. He noted that Guizhou Province is drought prone, and<br />

sorghum is used as a major raw material for the region’s wine industry. He specifically advocated strengthened<br />

cooperation with <strong>ICRISAT</strong> through continuing scholar exchange visits especially on crops like sorghum, millet<br />

and groundnut.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

1. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture in India;<br />

2. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in People’s Republic of China;<br />

3. Council for Agricultural Research and Policy in Sri Lanka;<br />

4. Centre for Policy Dialogue in Bangladesh;<br />

5. Pakistan Agricultural Research Council in Pakistan;<br />

6. Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Vietnam; and<br />

7. Chiangmai Field Crops Research Station, Department of Agriculture in Thailand<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

In kind contributions from partner organizations.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Climatic analysis in semi-arid tropical regions of India<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam<br />

20


Objectives/Rationale:<br />

One of the important activities of the project is the collection and analysis of long term secondary weather data<br />

in different districts of semi-arid regions of Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra in India. As part of this,<br />

description of characteristics of important weather parameters, like rainfall and temperature and also derived<br />

water balance parameters like soil moisture Index (SMI) and index of moisture adequacy for SAT regions of<br />

India have been carried out. The endeavor is been downscaled further at Mandal/tehsil level to provide the local<br />

level contexts in terms of adequacy of crop mix/choices and devising the technological interventions in crop<br />

improvement programmes.<br />

Expected outputs from the project are:<br />

• Improved understanding of climate variability<br />

• Strategies to range of initiatives for crop combinations for improving the livelihoods<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The study on trend analysis of rainfall of Anantpur and mehboobnagar revealed that no Mandal in both districts<br />

showed neither increasing nor decreasing tendency in south-west monsoon and annual period under more than<br />

100 mm category except two mandals in Anantpur district which showed decreasing trend at 90% level of<br />

significance. Under 75-100 mm rainfall category, one Mandal each from Anantpur and Mehaboobnagar district<br />

showed increasing trend on annual basis. It indicates that both the districts are not in the risk from heavy rainfall<br />

in the order of 75 mm and more. However, increased occurrence of heavy rainfall events under 50-75 and 25-50<br />

mm category, on an annual basis, was noticed in more number of mandals. This increased tendency was<br />

observed in more number of mandals in Anantpur districts than Mehboobnagar districts. The information on the<br />

heavy rainfall trend during crop season would help farmers community of a particular location to take necessary<br />

steps to minimize the crop losses. It also gives an insight for farmers and policy makers towards soil<br />

conservation measures as the heavy rainfall aggravates soil erosion. Qualitative, location specific forecast is<br />

needed very much to reduce the impact of heavy rainfall on crop yield. In addition, effective and timely<br />

dissemination of value added agro advisories among the farming community and promoting weather insurance<br />

schemes to cope with losses due to heavy rainfall events. Although prediction of such extreme weather events is<br />

still fraught with uncertainties, a proper assessment of likely future trends would help in setting up of<br />

infrastructure for disaster preparedness.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

• Similar climatic analysis reports were published in each partner countries<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- The Link between Climate Variability, Cropping Pattern and Revenue:<br />

Insights from Kanzara Village, India<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Rationale: Ascertaining the link between climate, cropping pattern and farmers livelihoods<br />

Countries involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives:<br />

The objective of this preliminary study is to observe changes in the cropping pattern for an SAT district in India.<br />

A village that is representative of the district and whose data available in the VLS database will be selected and<br />

its cropping pattern analyzed. Reasons for changes in cropping pattern will also be determined through village<br />

visit.<br />

This will serve to validate/ invalidate the assumptions that changes in cropping pattern are often driven by<br />

reasons other than climate. The implications of these drivers of change in cropping pattern on each household<br />

will be identified and a hypothesis that may alleviate the implications be proposed. Focus will be given to the<br />

2001-2007 VLS data so as to give relevance to study. It is envisioned that the findings of this study will result in<br />

a better economic wellbeing for the relevant stakeholders, in particular the rural households involved in<br />

agricultural activities. It is hoped that it can also serve as a reference for future studies in the area of rural<br />

development.<br />

21


Progress/Results:<br />

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing mankind now. On the agricultural side, climate change<br />

may reduce crop yield. Change in cropping pattern is one of the adaptation strategies to climate change.<br />

However, revenue and expenses considerations, not climate change, are the main drivers of change in cropping<br />

pattern.<br />

This study has validated the assumptions that change in cropping pattern is driven by reasons other than climate.<br />

Specifically for Kanzara, the adoption of soybean is driven by revenue and expenses considerations, not climate<br />

change. Given the riskaverseness of households, the role of experience adds another dimension to the decisionmaking<br />

process of cropping pattern change. Two implications of the current decision-making process are<br />

identified: 1) Delay in reaping the benefits of change in cropping pattern and 2) No significant changes in<br />

cropping pattern unless significant gain in revenue can be observed from the early adopters even though climate<br />

necessitates change.<br />

However, by linking climate to revenue, households show willingness in giving more weightage to climate as a<br />

factor to change cropping pattern. Three main points can be obtained from this part of the study: 1) Households,<br />

regardless of size, stand to gain by switching from cotton to soybean. 2) By not changing their cropping pattern,<br />

small households tend to lose more than medium and large households. A valid explanation for this observation<br />

is that there is a difference in resources, access to technology, irrigation facilities, etc between households of<br />

different sizes. This is in line with the widely accepted statement that the poor loses more than the rich. 3)<br />

Combining the first and second points, small households can minimize their losses by switching and/or<br />

increasing their soybean proportion and once they cross a certain threshold of soybean proportion, will start to<br />

see a positive increase in their revenue per acre. As for medium and large households, although they do not lose<br />

anything by not changing their cropping pattern, they stand to gain even more revenue per acre if they decide to<br />

switch and/or increase their soybean proportion. This could be a seed to alter the decision-making dynamics.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

London School of Economics and Political Science<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

: Andre Wirjo<br />

: Naveen P Singh, MCS Bantilan<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

In kind contributions from partner organizations.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> – Adaptation to Climate Change: An Investigation on the Effectiveness of<br />

Formal Institutions in Kinkheda Village, Maharashtra, India<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives:<br />

The main objective of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the formal institutions for facilitating<br />

climate change adaptation in a village level setting.<br />

The three main questions the research study attempted to answer were:<br />

• What is the extent of the impact of formal institutions on the farmers' ability to adapt to climate change.<br />

• What are the factors constraining the success of the already initiated formal methods of adaptation for<br />

the farmers, if any.<br />

• How can governance of formal institutions, like Panchayati Raj, be made more effective in helping<br />

farmers cope with climatic shocks.<br />

Hypotheses:<br />

Three hypotheses were set for this study, correlating to the study's focal questions:<br />

1. Formal institutions play an important role in adapting to climatic shocks in Kinkheda Village.<br />

2. The extent to which one benefits from the formal institutions in place correlates to their social status.<br />

3. Increasing the role of the farmers in policy-making decisions would have a positive impact on the operating<br />

schemes.<br />

22


Methodology:<br />

The study required a thorough examination of the Kinkheda village in July <strong>2010</strong>, entailing interactions with<br />

farming households through focus group discussions and individual interviews. Case studies were completed on<br />

five farming households, chosen using the purposive sampling method. The sampling was done with regard to<br />

farm size/ownership and sex. The different groupings of farmers were large, medium, and small-scale farmers,<br />

including landless laborers and women.<br />

The focus group discussions, comprised of about fifteen to twenty members each, served a dual purpose in the<br />

collection of research. They increased the significance of the study by providing an opportunity for the voices of<br />

more farmers to be included in the study, and allowed for a triangulation process to verify the responses<br />

received in individual case studies. Four focus group meetings were held: one with members of the Gram<br />

Panchayat, one with the large and medium farmers, one with the small farmers and landless laborers, and one<br />

focus group solely for women. Institutional mapping was carried out in the focus groups, which illustrates the<br />

most important institutions to each grouping. Carrying out the qualitative, semi-structured interviews in<br />

Kinkheda enabled a better understanding of the effectiveness of institutional schemes. In addition, secondary<br />

resources and <strong>ICRISAT</strong> village level studies (VLS) data from 2001-2004 were referenced and utilized in the<br />

study.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Climate change is a reality that is adversely affecting poor farmers, particularly those in the arid and semi-arid<br />

tropics. A wide range of institutions exist to facilitate climate change adaptation in village level settings, but the<br />

institutions are often lacking in their implementation. This study investigated the effectiveness of the various<br />

formal institutions for adaptation to climate variability and change. Analyzing the processes of the formal<br />

institutions and examining their impact on the farmers' adaption strategies helped determine how effectively the<br />

institutional schemes are operating. This qualitative case study analyzed the impact of the formal institutions on<br />

the farmers' ability to adapt to climate change in Kinkheda village, Maharashtra, India. The study involved focus<br />

group discussions and interviews with farmers and other key informants in the village to assess the formal<br />

institutions present in Kinkheda. Through the study, the formal institutions were observed to determine how<br />

they work to protect the farmers from the ecological and socioeconomic effects of climate variability and<br />

change. The study has demonstrated that all existing institutions must be properly integrated into society in<br />

order for farmers to receive the much-needed institutional benefits.<br />

The effects of climate variability and change severely decrease farmers' abilities to obtain a sufficient harvest to<br />

provide for their needs, particularly in the Semi-Arid Tropics. Many scientists further predict that current<br />

climatic variability will be exacerbated by the continued process of global warming, stimulating more<br />

difficulties with rain fed agriculture in India. Due to climatic challenges, formal institutions must play a vital<br />

role in assisting the farmers with adaption strategies. The farmers involved in the study did not perceive long<br />

term climate change as much as they did climate shocks and variability. Therefore, future questionnaires should<br />

focus on shorter term effects of the long and systematic climate change occurring.<br />

The study determined that although formal institutions play an important role in facilitating adaptation to<br />

climate change in Kinkheda Village, many leakages are present in the system. In order for farmers to<br />

successfully combat negative effects of climate change, the institutional sector must be significantly bolstered.<br />

An <strong>ICRISAT</strong> grant partnership with Kinkheda could be instrumental in creating access for farmers to schemes<br />

which would better their livelihoods. While moving forward with the proposed program, however, many lessons<br />

learned from this study must be taken into consideration.<br />

The main factors hindering the success of institutional interventions in Kinkheda are: few existing checks and<br />

balances in the system, poor policies, and discriminatory access to institutions. The institutional sector in<br />

Kinkheda is manipulated and controlled by the dominant members of the village. To allow a greater institutional<br />

access for the poor and socially isolated, the status of the vulnerable members of society must be increased. An<br />

excellent method to increase the voice of the villagers is to encourage collective action by providing social and<br />

economic incentives. Opportunities for farmer-government interaction must increase in accord, as the<br />

institutional sector is required to remove the veil which has been masking its operations. Transparency,<br />

accountability, and universal institutional access are three themes which need to be integrated into Kinkheda's<br />

institutional operations. By following the recommendations provided in the body of this report, the institutions<br />

in Kinkheda will be able to better assist farmers in adapting to climatic changes and challenges in the future.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Borlaug~Ruan Intern<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

: Leah Lucas<br />

: Naveen P Singh, Bantilan MCS<br />

23


Special Project Funding:<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: NARS partners Capacity building: Training Course on Cropping System<br />

Models Cropping System Models: Application in Land Resource Management<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

The course was attended by 32 participants from India, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Thailand, Sri Lanka, China,<br />

Colombia, USA, Vietnam and Botswana. The India Meteorological Department (IMD), Govt. of India, has<br />

sponsored 10 participants for this course, the ADB-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> project on `Adaptation Strategies to Climate<br />

Change’ has sponsored 6 participants, and IFPRI sponsored 3 participants.<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The ADB funded project also aims at developing a more informed coping strategies and safety nets which can<br />

be honed specifically by developing the knowledge and capacity of implementing agencies implementing the<br />

project on Vulnerability to climate change: adaptation strategies and layers of resilience. This will help the to<br />

consolidate the best practices and institutional innovations for mitigating effects of climate change, and develop<br />

strategies to address socio-economic problems relating to changing weather patterns, improved livelihood<br />

resilience of risk-averse farmers and concurrent investment by stakeholders. This effort will be greatly enhanced<br />

through a better quantification of the temporal and spatial impact of climate risk. Such an effort will enable<br />

identification, promotion and adoption of innovations that have a high probability of success and impact in the<br />

context of variable climates This will science-based solutions and pro-poor approaches to adapting agricultural<br />

systems to climate change for the benefit of the rural poor and the most vulnerable farmers in the semi-arid<br />

regions of Asia, particularly Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the People’s Republic of China (PRC),<br />

Thailand and Vietnam. Hence, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> (EA) trained NARS staff in modeling activities on biotic, abiotic and<br />

socio-economic variables in order to improve the understanding of climate change variability and its impact on<br />

agriculture.<br />

Methodology:<br />

The areas where capacity building training workshop include:<br />

• Geostatistical methods for the spatial analysis of environmental during 5-9 April, <strong>2010</strong><br />

• Cropping System Models: Application in Land Resource Management during 18-22 October, <strong>2010</strong><br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The capacity of national program partners as well as key staff benefited significantly through the training<br />

programs undertaken through ADB project. After conducting training of partners in the areas like;<br />

Methodologies and Conduct of Surveys, vulnerability ad agro-climatic analysis, data collection through<br />

qualitative and quantitative tools including social tools and familiarity with rapid rural appraisal instrument<br />

developed exclusively for data collection in 2009, it was felt necessary to provide somewhat advanced training<br />

incorporating both theoretical and practical knowledge regarding different research methods, simulation<br />

modeling, geospatial analysis and issues associated with climatic studies. Hence, two trainings with expert<br />

trainers from University of Florida were organized under aegis of Knowledge, Management and Sharing<br />

(KMS). The details are as under:<br />

(a) Training on Geostatistical Analysis of Environmental Data from 5 to 9 April <strong>2010</strong> <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru,<br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

Resource Person: Dr Pierre Goovaerts, Associate professor, University of Florida<br />

This course introduced a suite of geostatistical methods for the spatial analysis of environmental data.<br />

Participants learn how to apply geostatistics for the description of spatial patterns and identification of scales of<br />

variability, spatial interpolation and stochastic modeling of environmental attributes, creation of risk maps and<br />

their Use in decision-making. After completion of this course, trainees are provided skills to enable them to<br />

Import, visualize and analyze your own data in a space-time information system.<br />

24


The important topics covered were:<br />

(1) What is Geostatistics?<br />

(2) Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis<br />

(3) Description of Spatial Patterns<br />

(4) Modeling the Spatial Variability<br />

(5) Spatial Prediction<br />

(6) Accounting for Secondary Information in Kriging<br />

(7) Risk Mapping and Incorporation in Decision-making<br />

(8) Stochastic Simulation<br />

(9) Space-time Geostatistics<br />

The benefits accrued from the training course to the participants were as follows:<br />

(1) Learned how to conduct a complete geostatistical analysis using the new software developed at Stanford University<br />

(2) Gained a basic understanding of state-of-the-art geostatistical methods for stochastic simulation and spacetime<br />

interpolation<br />

(3) Received specialized, hands-on training in geostatistics<br />

(4) Learned when and how to choose the interpolation technique that makes best use of the information available<br />

(5) Learned about exploring and visualizing local relationships between environmental variables<br />

As a sequel to the above training, five day training workshop from 18-22 October <strong>2010</strong> on Cropping System<br />

Models: Application in Land Resource Management, was organized in <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru for the selected<br />

project staff from the 5 partner countries. The training comprised of lectures, presentations, group activities and<br />

hand-on exercise. The details are as under:<br />

(b) Training on Cropping System Models Applications in Land Resource Management (DSSAT crop model)<br />

from 18 to 22 October <strong>2010</strong> <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh<br />

Resource Person: Dr. James W. Jones, Distinguished Professor in the Agricultural & Biological Engineering<br />

Department at the University of Florida (UF) and Dr. Kenneth J. Boote Institute of Food and Agricultural<br />

Sciences, USA.<br />

The program described a practical approach for simulating effects of soil, weather, management, and pest<br />

factors on crop production. Instructors explained how crop growth and development, water use, uptake of water<br />

and nutrients and carbon dynamics are simulated. It covered procedures for collecting and managing crop,<br />

weather and soil data for adapting models for applications. Participants analyzed the management alternatives<br />

for single seasons and for crop rotations. Applications of models for studying water and nutrient management<br />

and adaptation to climate change were emphasized.<br />

Lectures were delivered alternatively with hands-on assignments using the DSSAT crop models and software<br />

package. Ample time was provided to discuss capabilities and limitations of the models and appropriate<br />

methods for their use.<br />

1. Overview of cropping systems models and DSSAT software<br />

2. Modeling climate effects on crop growth and potential yield<br />

3. Simulating soil water dynamics and crop responses<br />

4. Analysis of crop water requirements and water productivity as affected by climate, soil properties,<br />

and management<br />

5. Simulating soil N and carbon dynamics and crop responses to N<br />

6. Experiments and data requirements for adapting and using crop models for new regions and<br />

situations<br />

7. Genetic factors affecting crop productivity, water & nutrient use<br />

8. Analyzing yield & economic risks due to climate variability<br />

9. Simulating crop rotations for sustainable production<br />

10. Hands-on analyses of cropping systems for these topics<br />

The benefits accrued from the training course to the participants were as follows:<br />

a. Learnt the basic functions of a Cropping System Model<br />

b. Gained understanding of basic concepts of modeling crops and soils<br />

c. Received specialized, hands-on training in the DSSAT Cropping System Model and its applications<br />

d. Learned how to make use of cropping system models to evaluate long term field experiments<br />

e. Learned how to use the models for applications in water & nutrient management and climate change<br />

issues<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

25


Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

MTP Output 6: Strategies for increasing competitiveness through identifying preferred market traits and<br />

introducing quality control systems to meet social, food safety and environmental standards for dryland crops<br />

established and promoted<br />

Priority 5B: Making international and domestic markets work for the poor<br />

Priority 5B, Specific goal 1: Enhanced livelihoods and competitiveness for smallholder producers and food<br />

safety for consumers influenced by changes in national and international markets<br />

Priority 5B Specific goal 2: Improved marketing environment for smallholders by improving the efficiency of<br />

domestic markets<br />

MTP output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.6.2: Preferred market traits identified for livestock (in southern Africa) and dryland<br />

cereals in WCA region<br />

Intermediate Output Target <strong>2010</strong> Characterizing sorghum and pearl millet village economies in Northern<br />

Nigeria: Uptake of modern pearl millet and sorghum varieties in Northern Nigeria<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

85%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Nigeria<br />

Objectives/Rationale: To characterize sorghum and pearl millet village economies, assess the level of uptake of<br />

sorghum and pearl millet varieties, identify the drivers to uptake and assess the level of impact of sorghum and<br />

pearl millet on the livelihood of the poor.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

A survey consisting of a data set of 1136 households from 113 villages living in 6 states of Northern Nigeria to<br />

assess the current and potential adoption rates as well as the impact of modern sorghum and pearl millet<br />

varieties released during the last 20 years. The survey included 994 pearl millet and 998 sorghum producers in<br />

the 6 states of Northern Nigeria mainly Borno, Kano, Katsina, Jigawa, Yobe and Zamfara. These states account<br />

for about 50% of sorghum and pearl millet production and/or area in Nigeria. With a target of 1200 households<br />

to be collected on the 6 states, the number of villages selected by state was a prorata of population size at state<br />

level. Thus, 19 villages were randomly selected in Borno State, 12 in Yobe, 23 villages in Katsina, 29 villages in<br />

Kano, 20 villages in Jigawa, and 16 villages in Zamfara state. Within village, 10 households were selected based<br />

on a census list provided by the village chief.<br />

Survey were conducted at both the village and household levels in selected villages. At village level, generally<br />

a group of 10 to 15 respondents was assembled, representing village leaders as well as people of different<br />

genders, ages, occupations and social status in the village. The village questionnaire asked questions about<br />

access to markets, infrastructure and services, projects and organizations having operated or currently operating<br />

in the villages, local prices of inputs and outputs, and perception on welfare and resource changes,<br />

The household survey was conducted essentially with the household head, Information on household<br />

demographic characteristics, and endowments of physical, human, natural, financial and social capital, plot<br />

tenure and quality characteristics, and input/output table, knowledge and exposure to varieties, household<br />

perception to changes in welfare and resources.<br />

Improved sorghum varieties include ISCV400, ICSV111, Hybrid varieties, SK5912 and local varieties. Pearl<br />

millet varieties include SOSAT C88, GB8735, LCIC 9702, LCIC 9703, ICSM IS 89305, Ex Borno, and local<br />

pearl millet varieties.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Results showed that the observed adoption rate for improved pearl millet varieties is estimated to 32.95% and<br />

that of improved sorghum varieties is estimated to about 20.20%. The area planted to pearl millet varieties is<br />

higher for SOSAT C 88 (28.49% of pearl millet area), and less than one percent for other modern pearl millet<br />

26


varieties. For sorghum, ISCV 400 and ISCV 111 are the most widely adopted accounting for 8.46% and 7.07%<br />

of area cultivated to sorghum. Sorghum hybrids account for about 1.48% and SK 5912 for about 1.66%.<br />

Using the average treatment effect estimation, the potential adoption rate for pearl millet varieties is estimated to<br />

55.76% whereas that of sorghum is limited to 26.36% implying that the adoption gap is estimated to 22.82% for<br />

pearl millet and only 6.16% for sorghum. Potential for increasing adoption of sorghum is limited. Further<br />

investment in the exposure and promotion to modern sorghum varieties is not likely to warrant its costs.<br />

Farmers’ assessment of constraints limiting the use of sorghum varieties point to yields as a significant<br />

constraint to adoption if ISCV 400 for example,<br />

However, there is still room to increase the returns to investment on modern pearl millet varieties. In fact, the<br />

adoption gap estimated to about 23% is still very high suggesting a large potential adoption impact that could be<br />

realized by a successful promotion and dissemination of modern pearl millet varieties.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

LCRI, Nigeria, IAR Nigeria<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> Assessing drivers of demand for sorghum and millet in WCA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger, Mali and Nigeria<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To assess drivers of demand for sorghum and pearl millet by consumers in Mali and Niger and estimate the<br />

consumer price and income elasticities of demand.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Data were obtained from the Enquete Nationale Budget Consommation (ENBC) by the Institut Nationale de<br />

Statistique (INS) in Niger and the Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) in Mali. In Niger, 4000<br />

consumers of which 1916 consumers living in urban areas and 2084 living in rural areas from the eight regions<br />

collected in 2009. Data included age and sex of the consumer, the household size, level of education, socioprofessional<br />

groups, income groups, food expenditures and poverty level (poor and non-poor). In Mali, data<br />

consists of 4454 households of which 2702 consumers in the urban area and 2996 consumers in the rural areas.<br />

Akinleye and Rahji (2006) used the most comprehensive National Consumer Survey (NCS) dataset collected in<br />

2005 of the Federal Office of Statistics (FOS), Nigeria. This data consists of 8676 households 1294 households<br />

in the urban area and 7382 consumers in the rural areas.<br />

The price and income elasticities were calculated using the Almost Ideal Demand Systems (AIDS) of Deaton<br />

and Muellbauer, 1980. Deflators were estimated by the National Statistical Units of Niger and Mali.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

In Mali, the average consumption of cereals (rice, sorghum, pearl millet and fonio) is estimated to about 338<br />

kg/per person/per annum where 42% account for sorghum and pearl millet. The same trend is observed in both<br />

rural and urban areas. In Niger, the trend is different. Sorghum and pearl millet are largely consumed the poor.<br />

In urban area, sorghum and pearl millet consumption account for all 20% of non-poor urban consumers whereas<br />

in rural areas, sorghum and pearl millet account for about 87% of total cereal consumption.<br />

In Niger, in rural areas and in the poorest group, among non-price and income factors, demanders for pearl<br />

millet are likely to younger, living in larger household sizes, and illiterate. In Mali, in the same group, factors<br />

explaining pearl millet consumption are older and are polygamus.<br />

As a whole in Niger, sorghum and maize are price inelastic with elasticities between -1 and 0 while pearl millet<br />

and rice are price elastic with elasticities less than -1. Sorghum is found to be a substitute for rice, and rice a<br />

substitute for millet. However, maize is found to be a complement for sorghum, Rice is found to be a normal<br />

27


good while sorghum, maize and millet are income elastic. The consumer behavior changes as we move from<br />

urban non-poor to rural poor. In fact, rice becomes a giffegn good in the rural area in<br />

In Mali, rice and millet are not price elastic with elasticities between more than -1 and less than 0. However,<br />

sorghum and fonio are price elastic. Sorghum and fonio behave as substitutes, rice as substitute for sorghum,<br />

maize as substitute for sorghum, rice and fonio and millet as a complement for fonio. Rice and fonio are normal<br />

goods and income inelastic with expenditure elasticities positive but less than 1. Wherereas, sorghum, maize and<br />

millet are income elastic with elasticities greater than 1. The consumer behavior changes as we move from<br />

urban non-poor to rural poor. In fact, rice becomes a giffen good in the rural area. Millet maize and sorghum are<br />

price elastic but fonio is inelastic. In addition, fonio is highly income elastic<br />

In Nigeria, Akinleye and Rahji (2006) showed that rice and yam are luxury goods for low income households.<br />

Own price elasticities for sorghum, pearl millet and beans are price elastic. Cross-price relationships indicate<br />

that beans is complemented by other food items except yams; millet is a substitute for rice, sorghum, yam and<br />

maize and maize is a substitute for millet, sorghum, gari and beans. For mid-income households, rice, yam and<br />

millet are luxury goods while sorghum and maize are essential goods. Garri and beans are inferior goods.<br />

Sorghum is price elastic. Rice would substitute millet, yam and maize and sorghum would complement rice,<br />

millet, garri, beans and maize would substitute for rice, millet, sorghum and garri. For high income households,<br />

garri, beans and maize are inferior good. Sorghum is price elastic while other food are price inelastic. Cross<br />

price relationship showed that beans would substitute sorghum and yam and maize and yam would substitute for<br />

every other food item.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

ENBC-INS in Niger and INSTAT (Institut National de Statistique) au Mali.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Mapping marketing channels and measure transaction costs for selected<br />

value chains (food, feed, fodder) including competing crops (maize) (HOPE)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Tanzania and Ethiopia<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Identification of target markets and value chain survey for sorghum and finger millet<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Rapid market appraisal in selected major sorghum and finger millet production areas and at major wholesale and<br />

retail markets in Tanzania and Ethiopia. Preliminary data collected on the five levels of a value chain (technical,<br />

spatial, governance and economic structure as well as actors). In depth interviews with traders and processors<br />

will be based on this information.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Tanzania: Sorghum is a traditional staple food in the villages in Singida and Kondoa district and mainly grown<br />

for home consumption. Finger millet was some decades ago introduced as a cash crop and is mainly grown for<br />

commercialization purposes and not consumed by farmers in the village. There are no crop markets at the<br />

village level. Markets for finger millet are in urban centers like Singida town and Kondoa town, but also<br />

Dodoma, Dar Es Salaam, Arusha, Moshi and Mwanza. Rural assemblers collect finger millet in the villages and<br />

take it to the district towns from where it is shipped by traders from other areas (Moshi, Mwanze, etc.) to the<br />

respective final destination. There are some variations of this market channels. In some cases farmers supply<br />

district town markets directly, in other cases traders from e.g. Moshi purchase directly from farmers in the<br />

villages. In very few cases farmers and traders have some kind of longterm agreement with traders. Traded<br />

products are grains (at the farm level and on traditional wholesale and retail markets), pure or blended flour (on<br />

traditional retail markets either loose or packed, the latter either branded or non branded, and packed and<br />

braded in modern supermarkets) and local brews (that was not found at the market during the RMA). Flour is<br />

produced either on a household level or by some local small-scale enterprises but also by large-scale processors<br />

in Arusha and Dar Es Salaam. Flour is mainly used for porrdige. In some areas it is common to take porridge<br />

28


instead of tea in the morning, in other areas porrdige is mainly consumed by kids, pregnant women and<br />

diabetics. Local brews are also produced by individual households. Moreover, there is a processing industry for<br />

local brews in Arusha and Moshi.<br />

Ethiopia: In East Harege Zone, sorghum is mainly produced for home consumption, but still around 20% of the<br />

production is sold. There are several crop markets in each woreda (equivalent to district) of the Zone, where<br />

farmers can sell sorghum. Large markets were retailers as well as wholesalers are found are in the major town of<br />

the respective woreda (e.g. Fedis in Fedis woreda). The two major markets for sorghum from East Harege Zone<br />

are in Harer and Diredawa. In all markets only grain is traded. Processors were not found. In Awi Zone, finger<br />

millet is produced for home consumption and as a cash crop. Awi Zone has 32 Kebeles (administrative unit<br />

below woreda) and local or cooperative markets for crops are found in 20 Kebeles. The major markets are<br />

however three town markets. Some finger millet is also shipped outside Awi Sone to Gonder, Mekele and<br />

Wollo. Only finger millet grain is traded, which is than milled by households either at home or at a public mill.<br />

Finger millet flour is used for pancake (injera) or porridge. The grain is also used for local beverages. A<br />

processing industry does, however, not exist.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

This activity is the base for in depth interviews with selected traders and processors. The interviews will<br />

particularly provide information about the economic structure of the value chain and constraints and potential<br />

for the future market development.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

EIAR (Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research), ARARI (Amhara Regional Agricultural Research<br />

Institute), DRD (Department of Research and Development, Tanzania), URI (Ukiriguru Research Institute, Lake<br />

Zone, Tanzania)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Mapping distribution of target crops in target countries (HOPE)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Uganda, Eritrea, southern Sudan.<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Identification of target areas for sorghum and millet<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

District-level current agricultural statistics were obtained for Kenya, but are not accessible for Tanzania,<br />

Ethiopia, and Uganda. District level data for these countries was obtained from the published data from<br />

Agricultural Censuses, conducted in 2002/3 (Tanzania), 2008/09 (Ethiopia), and 2005/06 (Uganda). The<br />

Censuses for Tanzania and Ethiopia were downloaded from the web. The Agricultural Census reports for<br />

Uganda are available from the Uganda Bureau of Statistics. No disaggregated crop statistics could be located for<br />

Eritrea and southern Sudan. The data was entered into an Excel database for mapping. District level maps for all<br />

countries were obtained from <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Unit, WCA.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Mapping of district level data is ongoing.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

This activity will contribute to development of a regional database for <strong>ICRISAT</strong> ESA, as recommended by Tom<br />

Walker, Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural R&D in the Semi-Arid Tropics (March <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

KARI (current crop statistics, Kenya); NARO (Uganda Agricultural Census reports).<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

29


Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Baseline surveys of sorghum and finger millet production in Ethiopia<br />

and Tanzania (HOPE)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

60%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Tanzania and Ethiopia<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Collection of data on the production portfolio, input and output utilization and socio-economic aspects to<br />

characterize farmers, their trait preferences and the current farming system in the target areas.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Tanzania: Household surveys of 180 farmers in Singida district and Kondoa district respectively. In both<br />

districts the sample consists of 90 farmers from project intervention villages, 45 farmers from villages in the<br />

diffusion and 45 farmers from villages in an control area. In both districts sorghum and finger millet are grown.<br />

Ethiopia: Household survey of 130 famers in two sorghum growing areas and in one finger millet growing area<br />

(the latter is already conducted). In the finger millet area the sample consists of 90 farmers from project<br />

intervention villages and 40 farmers from villages in an control area. The samples for the sorghum growing<br />

areas still need to be defined.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Data was collected in three out of five areas. Data from the survey in Tanzania is entered at the moment, data<br />

from Ethiopia will be entered when surveys were conducted in all three sites. Data analysis will be done in<br />

2011.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

EIAR (Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research), ARARI (Amhara Regional Agricultural Research<br />

Institute), DRD (Department of Research and Development, Tanzania), URI (Ukiriguru Research Institute, Lake<br />

Zone, Tanzania)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.6.3: Determinants of smallholder market participation and marketed surplus of<br />

grains in selected markets in ESA, WCA and SA<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> Market surveys for groundnut, pigeonpea and chickpea in India<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Information on preferred traits and utilization patterns will provide useful feedback to the breeders and<br />

extension workers, making dissemination of cultivars easier. Further detailed information on market-preferred<br />

traits will aid in priority development and to better understand technology uptake constraints. This will<br />

progressively inform technology design and adaptation and facilitate scaling-up of identified and promising<br />

options to the wider impact target domains beyond the pilot areas.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Market surveys conducted in important trading centers of groundnut, pigeonpea and chickpea to determine<br />

average flow of goods and peak and lean seasons. Interviews with farmers, traders, wholesalers, processors and<br />

consumers were carried out in order to gauge preferred traits for the targeted crops and the important bottlenecks<br />

30


in the marketing system. For sorghum and pearl millet analysis of secondary data on consumption was<br />

undertaken using data published by the Government of India. Such an analysis would give insights on the uses<br />

of these crops in non-food uses.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Groundnut:<br />

Groundnut is one of the most important food and cash crop of India. Almost every part of groundnut has<br />

commercial value. India markets and exports groundnut kernels, groundnut in shell, HPS groundnut, and oil<br />

cake. Groundnut haulms and leaves serve as a rich source of cattle feed and raw material for preparation of<br />

silage. This study uses a value chain analysis approach to identify the opportunities and challenges that prevail<br />

at different stages of groundnut subsector in Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh spanning a full range<br />

of economic activities.<br />

Andhra Pradesh is an important groundnut growing state and one of the largest groundnut markets in India.<br />

Salient results of a value chain analysis for groundnut in the state are presented:<br />

Adoni, Gadwal and Jedcherla are some of the biggest groundnut markets in AP. Almost 85% of the produce<br />

from 40-50 villages is brought by the farmers to these market yards. Commission agents in these market yards<br />

usually facilitate the sale of produce by inviting the traders and oil millers to the bidding process.<br />

In the bidding process the traders and oil millers assign prices to the produce depending on various<br />

characteristics. All the bids are then taken to the market yard officials who then announce the highest bidder.<br />

Most of the traders and millers from local area and traders from Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu participate in this<br />

process.<br />

Most of the produce in the 90s was usually bought by the oil millers or by traders who decortify and sell it to the<br />

oil millers. However due to the high level of integration with the Mumbai markets and participation of traders<br />

from Maharashtra the utilization of produce has shifted toward confectionary purpose in these markets.<br />

Due to premiums attached in the confectionary trade most of the traders now prefer selling their decortified<br />

produce to the Maharashtra market. This has resulted in increase of the prices at the farmers’ end. On the other<br />

hand, the oil millers have not been able to buy high quality produce since the prevailing prices are well above<br />

the parity prices. This has resulted in oil millers shifting towards trading for confectionary markets or shifting to<br />

crushing of other crops like sunflower and soybean. These markets have also seen most of the local oil milling<br />

units shut down in the last 4 years. Adoni which once was regarded as an oil capital for Andhra Pradesh now<br />

imports oil from Maharashtra and Gujarat.<br />

The trading and price determination has also seen significant changes in these markets due to its integration with<br />

export and Mumbai markets. While shelling percentage was considered the most important factor for<br />

determining the price, the count per ounce which is the price determination factor for exporters is now being<br />

practiced while buying the produce at the farmers end.<br />

Chickpea:<br />

Chickpea in India is marketed either as a whole grain or in dal form or as futana (fried dal). Desi chickpea is<br />

marketed as whole grain dal and flour, while kabuli chickpea is marketed only as whole grain. Kabuli chickpea<br />

is exported to either north Indian states or other countries. The demand for the kabuli chickpea in north Indian<br />

states is gradually increasing. The processors procure the dal and futana in the markets through prevailing<br />

marketing channels. The Indian Government has implemented the export ban on pulses and zero per cent import<br />

duty. Due to this policy, imported desi chickpea is available at lower price than domestically grown desi<br />

chickpea.<br />

Salient findings from chickpea market survey in Prakasam district, Andhra Pradesh.<br />

The marketing channel for chickpea and its processed products is marked by a few important bottlenecks.<br />

1. A majority of the harvested produce is sold to the village traders owing to prior input- credit contracts.<br />

The market price that the farmers get in this situation is typically lower than when they their produce<br />

directly to the commission agent.<br />

2. There is no organized market yard that records chickpea arrivals, and prices. The different actors are<br />

spread out geographically and information about prices is not available in one place.<br />

3. In the absence of an organized market yard, information on prices and arrivals is not available. The<br />

only information that is available is the data that is record at the district check posts. However, it has<br />

31


een noted that these check posts are bypassed frequently. Further, the data that is maintained at the<br />

check post is for pulses or for chickpea, rather than for desi and kabuli varieties.<br />

4. There are additional links in the chain between chickpea farmers and dal processors that further erode<br />

the farmer’s share in the consumers’ rupee. Dal processors prefer to buy whole grain in bulk in order to<br />

cut down on their transaction costs. However, since a lot of the chickpea farmers are small scale<br />

farmers with small marketable surpluses, a commission agent who collects all the grain from the<br />

farmers, and sells it to the dal millers in bulk quantity becomes an important actor in the value chain.<br />

There are six different market chains identified revealed by the survey and the two most common / popular ones<br />

are:<br />

1. Farmer --- Commission agent----Trader --- Processor ---- Wholesaler ----Retailer ----Consumer<br />

2. Farmer --- Trader --- Processor ---- Wholesaler ----Retailer ----Consumer<br />

Data on the preferred traits and the most common production constraints in the cultivation of chickpea were<br />

collected from important markets in Kurnool and Prakasam districts of Andhra Pradesh and Dharwad and<br />

Gulbarga districts in Karnataka.<br />

The processing firms are located near the chickpea production area, and further growth in value addition is<br />

possible. Due to the existence of processing plants at the district headquarters, value addition is done to the raw<br />

gram involving primary and secondary level of processing.<br />

Pigeonpea is mainly marketed as decorticated grain dal in India. Market surveys were undertaken in important<br />

markets in Ranga Reddy and Mahabubnagar districts of Andhra Pradesh and Akola district in Maharashtra. Data<br />

on the preferred traits and the most common production constraints in the cultivation of pigeonpea were<br />

collected. The ruling varieties differed in both the project states with Maruti ruling in Maharashtra while Asha<br />

was the most popular cultivar in Andhra Pradesh.<br />

The pigeonpea marketing chain in Maharashtra comprises a variety of numerous market intermediaries such as<br />

commission agents, traders, wholesale traders, processors, retailers, exporters, etc., between the producer-sellers<br />

and the ultimate consumers. The market intermediaries here are very powerful and control the entire regulated<br />

market. The intermediaries get the lion’s share of the profit.<br />

The most significant constraints that the farmers faced when choosing to purchase seeds were the lack of<br />

information about recommended varieties and the non-availability of required variety. The low quality of the<br />

purchased seed was also cited as a reason. Farmers preferred to sell their produce in the village itself to village<br />

traders and payment was received soon after the conclusion of the marketing transaction.<br />

High tariff for the power supply and lack of labour for pigeonpea processing activities were the major problems<br />

confronting them as processors and had telling effect on the prices of pigeonpea dal.<br />

Sorghum:<br />

By and large food consumption of sorghum exhibits a declining trend across all the major sorghum producing/<br />

consuming states both in rural and urban India, but the decline is variable across states. The largest decline in<br />

consumption is seen for the states of Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh both in rural and urban areas.<br />

Though these states were important sorghum consuming states during 1970s and 1980s, the availability of<br />

cheaper staples such as rice in Andhra Pradesh and wheat in Madhya Pradesh has contributed to the increased<br />

substitution of sorghum.<br />

However, while food use of sorghum has declined sharply at the all-India level, its use as food is still<br />

important in major producing states like Maharashtra and Karnataka after rice and wheat although at levels 50%<br />

below that in 1972–73 level. The decline in per capita food consumption of sorghum however seems to be<br />

plateauing at this lower level as indicated by data between 1999 and 2005. At the same time, the use of sorghum<br />

in alternative uses has increased from about 5% since 1993–94 to 30% or more between 1999 and 2005. Our<br />

estimates further indicate that of the total food use of sorghum only 50% is accounted for by rainy (kharif)<br />

sorghum while the rest is from post-rainy (rabi sorghum). Thus, close to 50% of kharif sorghum goes for<br />

alternative uses. These include demand from animal feed industry mainly poultry and to some extent dairy,<br />

alcohol industry, starch industry, food processing and export demand. Almost the entire production of rabi<br />

sorghum (except seed and waste) is used for human food. The potential demand for food processing, though at a<br />

nascent stage, presents encouraging prospects for value addition.<br />

32


Pearl millet:<br />

Pearl millet utilization pattern is changing in India where its use is growing as feed, alcohol, and in processed<br />

food industry. With the introduction of cheaper rice and wheat through Public Distribution System (PDS),<br />

consumers of pearl millet in rural and urban areas have shifted away from pearl millet to consumption of wheat<br />

and rice. However, in the major growing states of India its utilization as food is still important though declining.<br />

Pearl millet consumption particularly in rural areas still forms an important component of the consumption of<br />

low income consumers. The increase in pearl millet production in India juxtaposed with its declining food use<br />

implies that its use in alternative uses has been increasing as indicated by the data from less than 5% to 55% in<br />

2004–05. Armed with the above information a reconnaissance survey was carried out of pearl millet markets<br />

and its users. The market surveys indicated considerable trade in pearl millet grain both intra state and interstate.<br />

The drought in Rajasthan (particularly western Rajasthan) is one of the key factors determining pearl<br />

millet trade for food use.<br />

Pearl millet fodder is an important feed resource in the crop–livestock systems where the crop is grown.<br />

Chopped pearl millet fodder is an important feed resource in rural area particularly in winter and summer<br />

months.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The consumption demand for sorghum and pearl millet will provide information on availability of these cereals<br />

for alternative uses and for processing. The utilization patterns will be corroborated through reconnaissance<br />

surveys of markets and finally a survey of the markets and processors will be carried out using a structured<br />

questionnaire.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>; University of Agriculture Sciences, Bangalore; University of Agriculture Sciences; Dharwad;<br />

Punjabrao Krishi Vishwavidyalaya (PKVK), Akola; Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, (TNAU) Coimbatore;<br />

Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

BMGF<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Groundnut in Malawi<br />

In Malawi, a study was conducted to examine the causal impact of the adoption of improved groundnut varieties<br />

on marketed surplus. The study was based on a household survey data of 400 groundnut producing households<br />

in rural Malawi collected by the International crops research Institute for the semi-Arid tropics in the year 2008.<br />

The counterfactual outcomes framework of modern evaluation theory was applied to the data to estimate the<br />

Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) of adopting improved groundnut varieties on the amount of marketed<br />

surplus and that of marketable surplus of groundnuts. Results indicated that 45% of the groundnut producers are<br />

autarkic while the rest are net sellers. The econometric analysis shows that the adoption of improved groundnut<br />

varieties has a positive and significant impact on the amount of marketed surplus as well as that of marketable<br />

surplus. The adoption of improved groundnut varieties significantly increases the amount of marketable surplus<br />

by 12kg per capita and it increases the amount of marketed surplus by 8kg per capita. We also find that<br />

increased production and higher prices are some of the other important determinants of the quantity of marketed<br />

surplus. The findings suggest that there is a scope for increasing the participation of farmers in the marketing of<br />

groundnuts through increased cultivation of improved groundnut varieties.<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Groundnut in WCA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger, Nigeria and Mali<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Assess the level and determinants of market participation by groundnut farmers in the 3 countries.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical legumes II (TL II)<br />

33


Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> Preferences for groundnut traits and varieties in West Africa: Cases of<br />

smallholder farmers in Mali, Niger and Nigeria<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mali, Niger and Nigeria<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To systematically evaluate farmers’ preferences based on plant and seed characteristics and overall preference<br />

for varieties.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Mother trials located in 6 project village sites in each country were used as the basis of choice for traits and<br />

varieties by farmers at harvest. The villages were selected based agro-ecological zone and prior knowledge of<br />

key informants or links with other initiatives in these villages. Based on potential characteristics likely to<br />

explain choice for varieties, a discussion was held in each country with groundnut experts as well as groups of<br />

farmers in order to evaluate alternative question formats, contents and elicit general advice from consumers for<br />

different traits. The last stage in the process involved the development of the survey instruments. Only<br />

characteristics that were ranked high via the expert meeting and focus-group meetings were included in the<br />

questionnaire. Accordingly, 15 plant and seed characteristics were included. Growth habit, disease resistance,<br />

plant vigor, color of the leaves, plant maturity, number of pods, pod filling, pod beak, pod reticulation, pod<br />

strangulation, pod and haulm yields, pod size, sees size and seed color were cited as important plant and seed<br />

characteristics for groundnut. An expert panel of 30 male and female farmers were used in the survey.<br />

In Mali, the varieties JL24, Fleur 11, ICGV 86124 and ICGV 86 015 were chosen. These varieties are resistant<br />

to drought and less susceptible to foliar diseases, and different based on plant type, plant maturity, pod<br />

reticulation, pod constriction; seed color and yields. In Niger, 6 varieties were used in the PVS. These varieties<br />

selected were 55-437, TS32-1, ICG 9346, J11, JL 24 and RRB and were different based the growth type,<br />

drought tolerance, color of the leaves, pod constriction, pod beak, pod reticulation, seed color and pod yield<br />

show some variability. In Nigeria, 5 varieties were selected namely ICIAR 19BT, ICIAR 7B, ICIAR 6AT,<br />

SAMNUT21 and SAMNUT 23. These varieties are resistant to groundnut rosette and are of the erect type<br />

except for SAMNUT 21 (semi-erect). They are all early maturing except for SAMNUT21 (medium maturity),<br />

with the same number of seeds per pod except for SAMNUT 21. Differences in varieties are found based on pod<br />

beak, pod reticulation, pod constriction, seed color and yields.<br />

Ordered Probit model was used to identify factors driving the ranking of farmers on varieties and measure the<br />

value of varieties plant and seed characteristics.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Color of the leaves, maturity (short cycle), number of pods, pod size, constriction, pod yield, pod filling<br />

and taste were the important attributes explaining farmers ranking for varieties in Mali. In Niger, the color<br />

of the leaves, the number of pods per plant, pod filling, pod beak, and pod yield were the most important<br />

traits sought by farmers. In Nigeria, plant vigor, plant maturity, plant type, number of pods per plant, pod<br />

size, haulm yield and pod yield. These traits should be used to identify varieties most likely to be adopted<br />

by farmers in large germplasm collection. Varieties with traits sought by farmers should be promoted and<br />

used to build sustainable seed supply systems. Attributes such as color of leaves, pod reticulation and pod<br />

beak tend to be overlooked and should be included in future breeding programs.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

INRAN, Niger, IAR Nigeria and IER, Mali.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes II (TL II)<br />

34


MTP Output 7: Institutional innovations for reducing transaction costs and improving coordination in input<br />

and output market chains for dryland commodities in domestic and international markets identified and<br />

promoted<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.7.1: Policy recommendations for improving market institutions, linkages and<br />

coordination for selected commodities developed and shared with policy markers and partners<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> Survey on farmer’s cooperatives in ESA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Tanzania, Kenya<br />

Objectives/Rationale: Determine extent to which farmer cooperatives have maintained democratic and<br />

transparent governance, avoiding capture by local elites.<br />

Methodology/Approach: Interviews with producer marketing groups (PMGs) using a pretested module were<br />

made in Kenya in 2008-09, and in Malawi and Tanzania in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

In Kenya, a study on Farmers' Informal Crops Marketing Groups was conducted and results revealed strong<br />

desire by farmers to form informal self-help groups to seek economies of scale. However, results indicated that<br />

the equilibrium sizes of informal groups tended to be small (only 5-50 members per group) and that there was<br />

limited or lack of trust and problems of leadership. This study also found evidence of a non-linear relationship<br />

between group size and members’ entry and exit decisions. Small groups tended to grow, while large groups<br />

tended to shrink, suggesting that there existed an optimal size for informal self-help groups. This optimum may<br />

depend on the nature of group activities. Smaller groups are generally perceived as more effective and larger<br />

ones as less transparent. The study also found evidence of a non-linear relationship between group size and<br />

turnover in the leadership, an indicator of having a functioning democracy. Very small groups have very low<br />

turnover, maybe a result of a binding human capital constraint due to numbers. Very large groups also have<br />

lower turnover than medium-sized groups, maybe because leading larger groups is more skill demanding,<br />

generating a new binding human capital constraint. It may also reflect that the largest groups are more attractive<br />

to capture for corrupt individuals, who will try to hang on to their lucrative positions of group exploitation once<br />

established there. Highly educated persons and persons with experience from well-paid public-sector<br />

employment are over-represented among leaders of self-help groups relative to their numbers in rural<br />

communities, especially among groups that were formed in response to NGO initiatives. This suggests that rural<br />

elites are quicker to respond to such initiatives. Thus, rural elites may enhance NGO initiatives to the benefit of<br />

poor villagers, but they may also influence implementation of NGO projects in ways that favor their own<br />

interests at the expense of the intended beneficiaries.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Molde University Norway<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.7.1: Synthesis of pilot market and institutional innovation studies in Asia using<br />

coalition approach completed<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, China<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Innovative forward and backward linkages that are fostered under the coalition approach ensure the fulfillment<br />

of the overarching project objective while meeting individual stakeholder sub-goals.<br />

35


Methodology/Approach:<br />

Strong communication protocols and bringing all stakeholders on a common platform are essential in the<br />

smooth functioning of the Coalition approach. Frequent meetings, workshops and email exchanges foster the<br />

consensus approach by encouraging open discussion.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Presently two projects involving coalition approach are being implemented in India and one in China. The two<br />

projects involve linking sweet sorghum farmers to the ethanol industry. The coalition partners involved in the<br />

projects include both research and non-research partners besides farmers. The first project in India funded by<br />

NAIP (ICAR) on Value chain model for bio-ethanol production from sweet sorghum in rainfed areas through<br />

collective action and partnership includes crop scientists from <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and the Directorate of Sorghum<br />

Research, agricultural engineers from Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, biochemists from<br />

Indian Institute for Chemical Technology, animal nutritionists from International Livestock Research Institute<br />

and Sri Venkateshwara Veterinary University, and private sector (Rusni Distilleries). Additionally the coalition<br />

includes credit agencies, fodder traders, and fodder processors. Using the coalition approach, two different<br />

models for linking farmers to the distillery are being tested. These include the centralized model and the<br />

decentralized model. Under the centralized model, farmer in a 50 km radius of the distillery deliver the sweet<br />

sorghum stalks directly to the distillery. While in the decentralized unit, farmers outside the 50 km radius take<br />

the sweet sorghum stalk to the decentralized crushing unit and later deliver the syrup to the distillery. The<br />

forward linkages established under this model include technical support to farmers on crop production, output<br />

contract agreements between the farmers and the distillery, and research and development collaborations<br />

between CRIDA, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and ILRI. The backward linkages include formation of Farmer’s Associations,<br />

supply of seed and fertilizer, training of farmers, pricing of stalk and syrup. This Coalition thus emphasizes<br />

public-private sector partnership so that needs of the industry for a sustainable supply of feedstock and the<br />

farmers for a fair share of the value generated from sweet sorghum ethanol value chain are simultaneously met.<br />

Some of the partnerships established for the success of the value chain include seed supply from established<br />

seed companies, manufacturers of crop machinery, credit agencies to support financial needs, feed processors to<br />

process bagasse to feed pellets/blocks, markets and marketing of syrup to food industry besides for ethanol<br />

production.<br />

The second project titled Enhanced Livelihood Opportunities of Smallholders in Asia: Linking Smallholder<br />

Sweet Sorghum Farmers with the Bioethanol Industry is being implemented in India and China. Under this<br />

project, the coalition partners in India include Marathwada Agricultural University, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, local NGOs, and<br />

Tata Chemicals Ltd and seed companies from the private sector. In China, Sorghum Research Institute in<br />

Lionging Academy of Agricultural Sciences is collaborating with farmers and distillery under a contract farming<br />

arrangement.<br />

Under both projects in India and China, national planning meetings were held wherein project activities were<br />

classified month wise and the responsibilities for the individual partner institutions were clearly delineated.<br />

Regular follow-up meetings with the partners were also organized to monitor monthly plan of activities, which<br />

were used as reference guides to carry out the activities.<br />

Village level meetings were organized in collaboration with partners wherein the objectives and activities of the<br />

project were discussed with the participating farmers. These meetings were helpful in clarifying the doubts of<br />

farmers and in bringing higher clarity about the project in toto. The local village level workers, leaders and Non-<br />

Government Organization (NGO) from the cluster villages under both projects played a key role in further<br />

explaining and clarifying the project objectives.<br />

In order to ensure the production of sweet sorghum, the farmers groups have been formed in each village and all<br />

support for strengthening these groups by imparting training on improved crop production methods are being<br />

given by the participating Partner Institutions (PI) and PEA. On-farm advice and field support was extended to<br />

the farmers group during the entire cropping season. Periodic field visits conducted by the subject matter<br />

specialists from PI, and training programs ensured the confidence building among the farmers. A microentrepreneurship<br />

training on DCU establishment and operation was conducted at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NAIP funded project: Directorate of Sorghum Research, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture,<br />

Indian Institute for Chemical Technology, International Livestock Research Institute, Sri Venkateshwara<br />

Veterinary University, Rusni Distilleries<br />

36


CFC funded project: Marathwada Agricultural University, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, local NGOs, Tata Chemicals Ltd, private<br />

seed companies, Sorghum Research Institute in Lioning Academy of Agricultural Sciences.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP) and Common Fund for Commodities (CFC)<br />

MTP Output 8: Policies and strategies that enhance agricultural diversification into high value products<br />

(e.g., legumes, livestock, biofuels, vegetables, etc) to harness emerging demand opportunities and facilitate<br />

agribusiness enterprises developed and promoted<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.8.1 Research report on economic feasibility of diversification into high value<br />

products with emphasis on biofuels (ESA, Asia) and vegetables (WCA) completed<br />

Intermediate Output target in <strong>2010</strong>. Economics of sweet sorghum cultivation and crushing units<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

1. Assess economic competitiveness of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for bio-ethanol with sugarcane<br />

molasses and grain<br />

2. Economics of sweet sorghum cultivation vis-à-vis competing crops.<br />

3. Economic assessment of decentralized crushing unit (established at Ibrahimbad) for crushing sweet<br />

sorghum and production of syrup from sweet sorghum<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Comparative economic analysis is carried out to assess the competitiveness of sweet sorghum in relation to<br />

competing crops at Ibrahimbad, Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Ex-post and break-even analysis is carried out to evaluate the economic feasibility of the unit.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The following are the main findings of economics of sweet sorghum cultivation vis-à-vis crops replaced Nanded<br />

district, Maharashtra under the centralized system.<br />

Cropping Pattern: Among rain-fed crops in Nanded district, sole crops of sorghum, soybean and intercrop of<br />

cotton-red gram, were the competing crops with sweet sorghum for cultivation. Apart from these crops wheat<br />

and soybean are also grown with supplement irrigation during post rainy season (Rabi) in this region.<br />

Cost of cultivation of sweet sorghum and competing crops: Total cost of cultivating sweet sorghum was Rs.<br />

14,285 / ha while that for competing crops like sorghum it was 12,797 / ha and Rs. 17,202 / ha for sorghum-red<br />

gram intercrop. Activity-wise, sowing and seed with 28 per cent was the highest component of cost of<br />

cultivation of sweet sorghum followed by land preparation and composting with 23 per cent and harvesting and<br />

threshing activity with 15 per cent. Among resources utilized for cultivation of sweet sorghum, human labor<br />

with 38 per cent was the highest resource component followed by fertilizer (farm yard manure and chemical<br />

fertilizer) with 28 per cent.<br />

Net Returns of Sweet Sorghum Cultivation and its competing crops: The average stalk yield was 20 ton / hectare<br />

and grain yield was 0.6 ton / hectare. The low grain yield was due to some of the sample farmers harvesting the<br />

crop at an early stage of maturity. Net returns of Rs. 9,503/ ha (excluding family labour) was obtained from<br />

sweet sorghum. Returns realized from sorghum & red gram intercrop was the next highest with Rs. 7,765 / ha<br />

followed by grain sorghum with Rs. 5,084/ha. Net returns realized from cultivation of high value crops like<br />

cotton and soybean was Rs. 24,982/ha and Rs. 18,664 /ha respectively. Returns realized from cultivating cotton<br />

– redgram intercrop was the highest among all the crops in Nanded district. Among the competing crops, sweet<br />

sorghum costs & returns are comparable only with grain sorghum.<br />

A brief draft note was prepared on the likely impact of the decentralized sweet sorghum unit for ethanol at the<br />

micro and macro levels based on findings from economic analysis in 2008 and 2009. In India, it is expected that<br />

37


at 10 percent mandatory blending of petrol with ethanol and assuming sweet sorghum would meet 5 % of<br />

ethanol requirement in the initial years increasing to 20 % in later years, the projected area under sweet sorghum<br />

cultivation would be 16.6 thousand hectares by 2020 @ current productivity of 20 t ha-1 . With increase in<br />

productivity larger area could be brought under sweet sorghum cultivation and blending requirement from sweet<br />

sorghum would also increase in the long run. The current production cost of sweet sorghum syrup at Rs. 26 / kg<br />

needs to be reduced by increasing the juice recovery, Brix % content, reducing unit cost of processing by<br />

improving labor efficiency and selling a portion of the product in alternate markets like food and pharma will<br />

have a big impact in reducing the unit cost of syrup.<br />

The critical areas identified for the success of the ethanol program from sweet sorghum under the decentralized<br />

unit include access and availability of improved cultivars for high juice and syrup recovery, capacity building in<br />

terms of formation of farmers association, stalk transportation chain, improving efficiency of crushing and<br />

promotion of alternative uses of bagasse. Sustainable up scaling of the decentralized units for sweet sorghum<br />

would impinge on favorable policy interventions related to pricing of stalk and end product of ethanol and<br />

institutional support linking farmers to industry.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, NRCS, CRIDA, IICT, ILRI, SVVU, MAU, TCL and Rusni Distilleries,<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

NAIP and IFAD<br />

MTP Output 9: Alternative institutional innovations to strengthen rural institutions that facilitate and<br />

enhance adoption of technological and market innovations and policy recommendations developed and<br />

shared with partners.<br />

Priority 5C, Specific goal 1: Identify mechanisms for the strengthening of producers organizations and for<br />

modes of participatory research<br />

Priority 5C, Specific goal 2: Identify new forms of partnerships with NARS, the private sector, public<br />

extension agencies, NGOs and producers organizations, and public agencies from other sectors, such as<br />

environment and health to enhance the conduct and impact from agricultural research<br />

Under this MTP output all output targets have been achieved by 2009 and <strong>2010</strong>. Hence there are no details<br />

reported here in this archival report. However , an output target under MTP output 10 (Output target 2011<br />

1.10.4) has relevance to this output also. The details of this are reported under MTP Output 10.<br />

MTP Output 10: Livelihood, institutional and policy options for investment and risk management for SAT<br />

poor developed and promoted with associated capacity building for partner<br />

MTP Output target <strong>2010</strong> 1.10.2 Uptake pathways of SAT technologies documented based on case studies and<br />

shared with national program partners in Asia<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>. Case studies on livestock and livelihoods in Zimbabwe published<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

95%<br />

The Livestock and livelihoods (LiLi markets) has been finalized, technical and financial project reports are<br />

completed, regional reports and policy briefs available in draft formats and will be used for peer reviewed<br />

journals. The project on livestock and water productivity phased out, with 1 PhD thesis completed, 2 papers by<br />

MSc students accepted in a peer reviewed journal and 3 papers in draft format to be submitted. The SLP project<br />

on optimization of crops residues started in <strong>2010</strong>. Research process and methods of data collection were<br />

designed and partnerships in the Southern African region established. Data collection and regional reports will<br />

be completed in 2011. The data characterize crop livestock systems, livelihoods and institutional context in<br />

southern Africa and led to further project development; achievement is therefore 95%.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

• LiLi markets: Mozambique, Namibia and Zimbabwe<br />

• Livestock and water productivity: Zimbabwe<br />

• Optimization of crop residues: Malawi, Mozambique, Zimbabwe<br />

38


Objectives/Rationale: The projects aim at improving the incomes and livelihoods of small-scale livestock<br />

producers in drought-prone areas in southern Africa. The overall working hypothesis that given the right market<br />

incentives, subsistence cattle and goat producers will move towards a more commercial orientation, with better<br />

management and higher off-take rates. Follow on projects focus more on identifying drivers of change, multipleuse<br />

technological options for improved crop-livestock productivity and trade off analysis in the allocation of<br />

crop residues for livelihood or environmental benefits.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

• LiLi markets project was implemented by a consortium of partners, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and ILRI, national<br />

research and extension services, farmers, local policy makers, NGOs and the private sector. The project<br />

developed an innovation systems approach (Innovation Platforms, IPs) that engages sub-sector<br />

participants (input suppliers, farmers, traders, market intermediaries, service providers, regulators) in a<br />

process of consultation to analyze their area specific challenges and opportunities in livestock<br />

production and marketing and develop concerted action to generate solutions and improve existing<br />

systems. Classical research tools (household surveys, participatory appraisals) were combined with the<br />

documentation of multi-stakeholder discussion and analysis.<br />

• Livestock and water productivity project focused on applied on-farm and community based research as<br />

well as strategic on-station research, primarily through post-docs, PhD and MSc students.<br />

• Optimization of crop residues project combines minimum data sets of key bio-physical parameters,<br />

village and household surveys, trend analysis, ex-ante tradeoff modeling, and identification of potential<br />

technical and institutional solutions.<br />

Main findings, results and policy implications:<br />

1) Context specific understanding of constraints and opportunities in livestock production and marketing<br />

The IP approach is the most important public good produced by the project. It aims at enhancing communication<br />

and knowledge sharing among key value chain actors and informs appropriate interventions for improving<br />

livestock markets along with appropriate technology development, dissemination and use. The approach was<br />

embraced by the different country teams and now contributes meaningfully to other initiatives in the countries.<br />

Baseline diagnostics and value chain analysis confirm that there are significant opportunities in the entire region<br />

to increase livestock production, enhance value addition by farmers (Figure 1), and thereby impact at household,<br />

local and regional level. Livestock plays a major role contributing significantly to the livelihoods and food<br />

security of households. The market itself offers strong opportunities for livestock, which motivates the sector<br />

participants to engage further in the IP process.<br />

3000<br />

Price and cost items (ZAR/goat sold)<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

Value Added<br />

Other costs<br />

Transport<br />

Inspection<br />

Animal Health<br />

Feed<br />

Purchase price<br />

0<br />

Producer<br />

Tshlotslo<br />

Producer<br />

Gwanda<br />

Trader<br />

Retailer<br />

Figure 1. Value addition by actors in goat value chains in Zimbabwe<br />

Main production constraints are unacceptably high mortality rates up to 30% – the first step to increase<br />

production and productivity would be to reduce mortality. More animals could thereby be availed for sale and<br />

market participation substantially increased. The nexus between a household’s livestock herd sizes, off-take and<br />

the need to sell to address household cash requirements is a critical dynamic. Farmers with small herds sell a<br />

greater proportion of their herds to makes end meet, while farmers with larger herds sell more animals, but this<br />

constitutes a small proportion of their herds.<br />

39


Since mortality is primarily a function of animal husbandry, disease and dry season nutrition are entry points. In<br />

most areas, access to inputs, technologies and support services are however major challenges, with poor or<br />

lacking government support services and lack of incentives and security for private sector investment. Farmers<br />

have poor knowledge and skills in supplementary feeding and animal health control, and rely mainly on<br />

information from other farmers. Membership in producers associations is generally low, but higher in countries<br />

like Namibia, with better developed livestock markets, indicating a strong probability that market development<br />

can stimulate collective action.<br />

Livestock markets are poorly developed and basic infrastructure not available in Mozambique and Zimbabwe.<br />

Most farmers sell livestock at the farm gate by default and do not understand essential market processes. In<br />

certain areas, livestock numbers do not warrant the time and effort for buyers to attend, resulting in low number<br />

of buyers resulting in reduced competition and therefore also reduced prices.<br />

2) Increased knowledge base of improved product marketing systems<br />

The key outcome of this project component is to increase the understanding towards challenges to improved<br />

market systems, and highest priority for making basic infrastructure accessible to communities, along with<br />

addressing institutional constraints so that market infrastructure can become functional. In Mozambique and<br />

Zimbabwe the emphasis was more on basic market infrastructure and organization, as compared to Namibia<br />

with better developed markets and priority on enhancing the performance and efficiency of these market<br />

systems. It is the IPs role to strengthen partnerships among the local market participants and strengthen<br />

confidence among them. This can be the beginning of enhancing investments in market infrastructure and<br />

services. Policy makers need to create opportunities for such partnerships through public support programs or by<br />

attracting private sector engagement. Country examples are:<br />

In Mozambique the IP played a vital role in raising awareness of these challenges to the relevant authorities. The<br />

participants requested government and other development partners to assist the communities with funds to<br />

support the construction of the necessary infrastructure. The investment partners responded positively through<br />

the financing of two projects, sale pens in Changara (Tete province) and an abattoir in Chicualacuala (in Gaza<br />

province).<br />

In Zimbabwe the IPs decided for the establishment and rehabilitation of conventional auctions as the best way of<br />

selling off livestock. The country teams engaged successfully in new initiatives for developing auctions in<br />

Gwanda (Matabeleland North Province), which materialized in goat sales of a total value of USD 53,000 at one<br />

newly constructed sale pen 2009. In Tsholotsho (Matabeleland North) the activities were inhibited by<br />

institutional constraints, showing that facilitating strong social relationships among local government, sellers,<br />

buyers and service suppliers is critically important so that market infrastructure can become functional.<br />

In Namibia, Omatjete (Erongo region) the IP encouraged farmers to appreciate the possible value buyers could<br />

add by providing market information to farmers and jointly develop more efficient market systems. In<br />

Hoachanas (Hardap region) highlighted the need to improve the operational efficiency of the farmers<br />

associations’ marketing committee by advertising market events, mobilizing farmers to supply sufficient number<br />

of quality animals, and organizing the actual market days.<br />

3) Increased knowledge base of improved input delivery systems<br />

IPs defined closer access to production technologies, training and inputs as most critical challenge for farmers to<br />

increase livestock productivity. Most technical options, inputs and information are available within the national<br />

research and extension systems but not accessible for farming communities. The role of government in<br />

providing support services in technology dissemination is dwindling as a result of limited resources, lack of<br />

skilled and experienced personal. In Mozambique and Zimbabwe NGOs are slowly taking up livestock<br />

production in their programs and recognize market led input delivery as more sustainable strategy than hand<br />

outs, e.g. promoting investment in community infrastructure or rural agro-dealer programs. In Namibia, where<br />

farmers’ associations and private sector played a greater role in market development processes they were<br />

initiated to form a new partnerships in running a veterinary outlet, and thereby made inputs, information and<br />

technologies available to farmers.<br />

The project demonstrated the importance of investing in capacity building and delivery systems, towards<br />

integrated and market oriented input and technology dissemination. Should small scale farmers engage in<br />

increased procurement of inputs, the private sector can provide these services where it is to their benefit, i.e.<br />

livestock traders display technologies and information at livestock market places or agro-dealers stock<br />

agricultural inputs (for crop and livestock production) at rural business centres and sell them at livestock market<br />

40


places where farmers are concentrated and with cash in hand. The input market potential in the small-scale<br />

farming sector has been largely underestimated and need to be demonstrated to the private sector.<br />

It is strongly recommended to enable input suppliers to make their services (with regards to information and<br />

products) available at the point of livestock sale. Preliminary information clearly illustrates farmer’s<br />

preparedness to purchase inputs the point where animals are sold. By providing inputs at the market place will<br />

create the incentive for further investments in production.<br />

IPs by facilitating the dialogue among value chain participants are instrumental to create the link between<br />

market development and improved input delivery systems. Thereby they can make livestock production<br />

technologies and services accessible to the communities. Policies need to encourage partnerships that gradually<br />

build and improve alternative forms of input delivery.<br />

4) Improved information dissemination and evaluation of technology and market opportunities<br />

The project successfully established a communication strategy that engages relevant stakeholders in an area to<br />

share information, and jointly make decisions and plan new initiatives. IPs facilitated direct links between<br />

farmers and other sub-sector participants (private and public), with operational structures defined by the local<br />

IPs themselves. Once established, the IPs engaged in iterative processes of consultations through form of<br />

workshops during which they defined their own agenda, diagnosed problems and options for improvements.<br />

These workshops were interspersed with project activities agreed upon by the IP, e.g. surveys, trainings,<br />

exchange visits. Initially the IP was strongly facilitated by the project, and funded through the project. Ideally<br />

stakeholders can gradually take over this role as the benefits to the role-players are established. The IPs can<br />

merge into larger networks that enhance knowledge transfer and learning. The IPs thereby the first time brought<br />

all participants in the livestock sector together to debate about their common interest. This has helped to<br />

improve their understanding about their roles and requirements in interaction with farmers. By engaging local<br />

policy makers the IPs increased their capacity in developing supportive policy options for linking farmers to<br />

livestock markets and improved support services. Effective IP structures however need substantial facilitation<br />

which needs to be budgeted in time and costs. The real value in studying the IPs is to document the modes of<br />

operations, challenges and lessons learned. It is therefore important to define efficient and functional M&E<br />

procedures at the onset of the IPs.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The presentation of the results focus on the LiLi markets project and major project outcomes from the IP<br />

approach. Beyond its projects <strong>ICRISAT</strong> had various requests to train institutions in other countries and on other<br />

commodities on the IP approach. The results/outcomes are available as draft reports but not yet submitted for<br />

publication.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

LiLi markets<br />

• International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Nairobi and Mozambique<br />

• Mozambican Agricultural Research Institute (IIAM), Mozambique<br />

• Namibia National Farmers Union, NNFU, Namibia<br />

• Department of Agricultural Research for Development (DAR4D) and Department of Livestock<br />

Production and Development (DLPD), Zimbabwe<br />

Livestock and water productivity<br />

• International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Ethiopia<br />

• International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Ethiopia<br />

• Department of Agricultural Research for Development (DAR4D), Zimbabwe<br />

• Center for Development Research (ZEF), Germany)<br />

Optimization of crop residues<br />

• International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Ethiopia and Mozambique<br />

• Bunda college, Malawi<br />

• Mozambican Agricultural Research Institute (IIAM), Mozambique<br />

• Department of Agricultural Research for Development (DAR4D), Zimbabwe<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

• Livestock and livelihoods: Improving market participation by smallholder producers, 2007-<strong>2010</strong>, funded by<br />

EU and support from SADC<br />

41


• Improving Water Productivity of Crop-Livestock Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa, 2008 -<strong>2010</strong>, led by<br />

ILRI/IWMI, funded by BMZ<br />

• Optimizing livelihood and environmental benefits from crop residues in smallholder crop-livestock systems<br />

in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: regional case studies, <strong>2010</strong>-2011, funded by CGIAR SLP<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.10.1 <strong>Report</strong> on rural livelihoods in the context of relief programs in Zimbabwe<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> Protracted Relief Program (PRP): Conservation Agriculture Practices and<br />

Challenges in Zimbabwe<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

At least 88 % of the farmers in the panel study continue to practice conservation agriculture, after at least 5<br />

years of adoption.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The present study is continuation of the previous panel survey completed as per the MTP Output target 2009<br />

1.10.2. The study sought to assess the conservation agriculture practices, constraints and contribution to food<br />

security.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The study is based on a panel survey approach established in 2007 assessing the adoption trends of households<br />

where conservation agriculture has been promoted by different donor agencies. The 2009/10 panel survey<br />

followed a similar trend to the preceding surveys but more emphasis was put on addressing the major challenges<br />

which have been recurring in previous studies. Two parallel surveys were conducted to investigate labor<br />

requirements and use of crop residues as mulching material in conservation agriculture practices.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Food insecurity remains one of the major challenges faced by vulnerable households in rural Zimbabwe. The<br />

majority of the households in the communal areas of Zimbabwe are resource constrained and are perennially<br />

faced with food insecurity and malnutrition. Hand hoe based conservation agriculture involving digging of<br />

planting basins is being promoted in the smallholder farming sector to improve and stabilize yields while<br />

preserving soil and water. Winter weeding, crop residues application and rotation were least practiced across the<br />

survey districts. Fertilizer application was largely dependent on provision of free relief inputs. Contribution of<br />

conservation agriculture to food security is still limited due to smaller plot sizes and labor constraints.<br />

Recommendation to mechanize conservation agriculture will improve the technology adoption with support<br />

from a functioning input market.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The contribution of conservation agriculture to food security is limited by small area, largely attributed to labor<br />

constraint associated with the hand hoe based planting basins, limited access to improved seed and fertilizer. To<br />

address these challenges to adoption, conservation agriculture should be promoted under functioning input and<br />

output markets and labor saving technologies such as the use of herbicides and mechanization of land<br />

preparation should be promoted.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

AGRITEX, CARE, CAFOD, CRS, World Vision, Save the Children (UK), Action Contre la Faim (ACF),<br />

Christian AID and Concern Worldwide<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

FAO Letter of Agreement (LOA) for Conservation Agriculture Panel Study, Labor Measurements and Basin<br />

Size Trials.<br />

Addendum for supplementary PRP funding.<br />

World Vision Zimbabwe Memorandum of Agreement for providing technical supporting to agricultural<br />

development.<br />

42


Intermediate Output target <strong>2010</strong> Zimbabwe Emergency Agricultural Relief Program (ZEAIP)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Seed utilization rate - 90 % of the relief seed received was planted. ZEAIP contributed 41% of the maize<br />

planted by beneficiary households.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The Zimbabwe Emergency Agricultural Input Project (ZEAIP), funded by World Bank and managed by GRM<br />

International was implemented in 45 districts in all the 8 rural provinces of Zimbabwe. The program was<br />

implemented through NGOs, distributing maize seed or vouchers which could be redeemed for maize seed at<br />

retail shops to vulnerable households. Over 300,000 households accessed 10kg maize seed. These inputs were<br />

distributed though direct distribution in 40 districts and through retail voucher program in 5 districts. <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

was contracted to implement the impact assessment of ZEAIP.<br />

The study sought to review the efficiency of targeting vulnerable households, quantities of seed distributed to<br />

households, seed utilization rates, areas planted to ZEAIP seed and overall impact of ZEAIP maize seed to<br />

household and national crop production and food security.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The first survey (post planting) was implemented in 12 districts systematically sampled to reflect the diversity of<br />

NGOs and the different natural regions. A total of 1079 household were interviewed in February and March for<br />

the post-planting survey. This initial survey investigated targeting efficiency, whether ZEAIP seed was<br />

distributed, seed utilization rates as well as areas planted to ZEAIP maize seed. The second survey (post harvest)<br />

was implemented in 6 districts and a third of the households (364) that participated in the post planting survey<br />

were covered. The post-harvest survey was implemented in May and June where a smaller sample was used to<br />

enable detailed field area and yield measurements from ZEAIP and comparison plots. The second survey<br />

collected information on crop harvest, impacts of the ZEAIP program on household and national food security.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The post planting survey results indicate that targeting of beneficiaries was efficient and largely focused on<br />

vulnerable households. Over 72% of the beneficiaries did not have access to draft power, and the average maize<br />

production in the previous season was 114.4kg per capita reflecting a deficit from the minimum food security<br />

requirements of 167 kg per capita. Each ZEAIP recipients received 10kg of maize seed, with some exceptions<br />

where the local NGO split a 10kg-pack between two beneficiaries giving an average lower than 10 kg. Some<br />

NGOs gave CA demo farmers 2 packs in other areas which resulted in an average of higher than 10 kg. An<br />

estimated 307 630 households benefited from this relief project.<br />

The ZEAIP maize seed was distributed on time to recipient households. Eighty-six percent of the seed was<br />

distributed by November and by the first week of December all seed had been distributed. Based on post<br />

planting survey results 90% of the seed received through ZEAIP was planted although drought spells affected<br />

crop planting activities in the southern drier parts of the country. Based on the average seed utilization rate of<br />

90% and the actual quantity of seed delivered, it is estimated that improved ZEAIP maize seed was cultivated on<br />

137, 050ha of smallholder farmers’ land. For these recipients, ZEAIP was a major source of maize seed in<br />

2009/10 cropping season contributing 41% of the total maize area planted in the targeted areas. There was an<br />

overall 14% increase in the area planted to maize during the 2009/10 cropping season as compared to 2008/09<br />

season. This increase in maize area planted can be attributed to improved access to maize seed through ZEAIP.<br />

Harvest data indicated that ZEAIP contributed to about 60% of the total maize production in the study area.<br />

Farmers who planted ZEAIP hybrid maize had higher yields (1,747 kg/ha) compared to Non - ZEAIP hybrid<br />

maize (1,252 kg/ha). Improved seed distributions from ZEAIP enabled households to achieve maize yields of<br />

1411kg/ha compared to 620kg/ha from recycled seeds. Relief distribution may need to focus on making hybrid<br />

seed accessible to farmers, even in drier agro ecological regions. This finding is reinforced by the consistent<br />

preference of hybrid maize seed by farmers in the study districts. Despite poor rains experienced in most past of<br />

the country the proportions of households that produced enough grain increased from 30% in 2009 to 48% in<br />

<strong>2010</strong> season.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

43


A shift from direct input distribution to market based options will be necessary if commercial market channels<br />

are to be revived in Zimbabwe. Current options for market based input relief include the voucher system<br />

redeemable in retail shops and seed fairs for local seed acquisition. However, in areas where there is inadequate<br />

market infrastructure, direct distribution may need to be maintained, and can be complemented by seed fair<br />

vouchers which require less of fully functional market infrastructure. It is becoming increasingly important to<br />

incorporate markets in relief programs as a strategy to promote functional and sustainable local seed markets.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Protracted Relief Program (PRP) partner NGOs.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

The World Bank through GRM International (management team for PRP) funded ZEAIP.<br />

Intermediate output target <strong>2010</strong>-Tracking the Diffusion of Improved Varieties in South Asia (TRIVSA)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

10%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India (Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Haryana)<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Despite the progress made in the past, poverty is still concentrated in South Asia, which accounts for around 350<br />

million, or one-third, of the world’s poor of about 1.1 billion. Substantial scope exists for a further reduction in<br />

poverty through crop genetic improvements to increase and stabilize the yields of major food crops. Modern<br />

varietal change in itself may not lift large numbers of people out of poverty, but greater dynamism in this area<br />

can go a long way toward moving poor people closer to that threshold. Moreover, modern varietal change can<br />

set the stage for the adoption of improved crop management practices, thereby making it possible for farmers to<br />

reduce the cost of production substantially. The lack of dynamism in varietal change in food-crop production<br />

represents wasted opportunity that is potentially very large, exacting a heavy toll on poor producers and<br />

consumers alike. The aim of this project is to lay the groundnut work for tracking and successes and failures of<br />

crop improvement investments and for understanding the impact of those investments on poverty, nutrition and<br />

food security.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The project starts with wider understanding of key aspects of the performance of food-crop genetic<br />

improvement in priority commodities (<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Mandate crops) in India. Initially, the emphasis begins with<br />

documentation of modern varietal database as well as the scientific strength of crop improvement by commodity<br />

programs. Later, it will be followed up with document the perceived adoption of new cultivars of <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

mandate crops through expert elicitations using Delphi technique. At the second level, a nationally<br />

representative survey will be conducted in any one state of India (where five <strong>ICRISAT</strong> crops are grown) for<br />

deeper understanding about the adoption and diffusion of new cultivars.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

• The project inception workshop was held in June, <strong>2010</strong> at Kathmandu, Nepal. The project work plans are<br />

finally and submitted to IRRI in November, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

• Design, adoption and standardized of protocols have been finalized for data assembly on varietal release<br />

and strengths of NARS crop improvement programs<br />

• Crop-variety databases on Pearl millet (from AICPMIP) and Sorghum (from DSR) have been collected<br />

• The expert consultations with Pearl millet and sorghum breeder groups are under progress.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

IRRI and NARS from India<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tracking the Diffusion of Improved Varieties in South Asia (TRIVSA)<br />

44


MTP Output target 2011 1.10.2 <strong>Report</strong> on household economies in SAT Asia (2001-2009) completed<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Preparation of village profiles for six traditional villages (Aurepalle,<br />

Dokur, Shirapur, Kalman, Kanzara and Kinkheda) of VDSA project.<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

70%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Broad objective is to understand and document the dynamics of the study villages over a period of four decades.<br />

Specific objectives of the study are as follows:<br />

1. To document the changes in livelihood system and their underlying factors.<br />

2. To analyze the poverty dynamics observed in the villages and factors contributing towards moving out of<br />

poverty and getting into the poverty trap.<br />

3. To understand the development pathways of different households over a period of four decades.<br />

4. To know the role, effectiveness and impacts of various institutions, and government programs on the<br />

villagers.<br />

5. Finally, based on the results and findings of the study, put forward some policy suggestions for promoting<br />

growth in rural areas, foster technology generation and exchange, improve food and nutrition security,<br />

enhance resilience in livelihood systems and speed up poverty reduction.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The study was completed using both quantitative and qualitative household data as well as secondary data.<br />

These include: (1) Analysis of longitudinal data for the period 1975-1984 and 2001-2009; (2) Collection of<br />

secondary data; (3) Focus group discussions with the villagers; and (4) Thorough review of existing literature<br />

and publications on the villages.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

All the six study villages have progressed over time. The crop productivity, real wages, employment<br />

opportunities and real incomes have increased over time. Cropping pattern and sources of incomes have<br />

changed significantly. Poverty levels have declined substantially, especially in the recent past. Access to and<br />

average level of education have increased across all the villages, castes, gender and economic groups. The<br />

overall living standard has improved in these villages. However, these changes varied in degree across the<br />

selected villages. The main drivers of development/change are: growth of non-farm activity in Aurepalle;<br />

migration income in Dokur; intensification of agriculture and technology adoption in Kanzara; increase in farm<br />

productivity in Kinkheda, diversification of crop production and economic activities (including industries) in<br />

Shirapur; and diversification of farm and non-farm activities in Kalman. Amongst these villages, development<br />

in Kinkheda was relatively less due to lack of social capital and collective action.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.10.3 Analysis of alternate investment options and their trade-offs completed<br />

and accessible to rural poor in Asia<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> - Vulnerability to climate change: adaptation strategies and layers of<br />

resiliency<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The specific objectives were to understand and identify:<br />

i) The perceptions to climate change;<br />

45


ii) Vulnerability and adaptation capacity based on their perceptions; and<br />

iii) Adaptation strategies emerging at the technological, institutional and the socio-economical level of<br />

the farmers in the SAT.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Purposive sampling was used to understand and identify perceptions of climate change and subsequent<br />

adaptation practices. Focus group discussions and individual interviews were carried out with large, medium<br />

and small farmers, landless labourers and women using semi-structured questionnaires. Among the farming<br />

group, care was taken to interact separately with the first (older) and the second (younger) generation farmers in<br />

order to appreciate the difference and similarities in their perceptions and adaptation behaviour. The information<br />

gathered was triangulated by means of narratives, timelines and transect walks. A total of 21 FGDs, and 52<br />

individual interviews were conducted.<br />

The coding process was the most important part of the analysis as it formed the basis of the findings that<br />

emerged related to perceptions, vulnerability, adaptations to climate change and the layers of resilience for the<br />

same.<br />

Key issues that emerged during the first round of data collection were incorporated into the analytical<br />

framework and further rounds of elicitation carried out to gain a deeper understanding of the subject. This<br />

process hence helped generate explanations regarding the impact and the adaptations, the role of institutions,<br />

technology, participation and collective action that were grounded in the context of climate change.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The threats related to climate change are apparent across the globe. It has been accepted that the worst hit in the<br />

coming future are going to be the agricultural community. Therefore it a need for micro-level studies to<br />

understand community perceptions and actions as a guide in devising viable adaptation strategies. Through the<br />

capability approach and using grounded theory as the method of analysis, this paper tries to understand the<br />

perceptions of the farmers to climate change, the impacts and the adaptation strategies and behaviour that they<br />

are demonstrating based on their perceptions. In doing so the paper draws attention to certain constraints that the<br />

communities in the six villages are facing and the implications on their capabilities and capacity to adapt. The<br />

six villages representing the first generation <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Village Level Studies (VLS) sites, are unique as the<br />

presence of longitudinal data enables the understanding of perceptions of both the first generation (old) and<br />

second generation (young) of farmers. The study showed that climate change/variability is becoming a major<br />

concern for the farming and non-farming community. Because of their perceptions, they have been adapting and<br />

have developed coping strategies to shield themselves against climate uncertainties. Diversification into short<br />

duration crops, commercial crops like sugarcane and soybean along with experimenting with vegetable growing,<br />

indigenous methods of soil conversation, the involvement of women in farm activities, and caste- based<br />

professions have emerged as effective strategies that have come to be accepted socially and culturally at the<br />

local level. At the institutional and the community level, there are serious constraints towards adapting to what<br />

may be a more challenging future resulting from climate change. The lack of collective feeling and action has<br />

hindered bargaining for better market prices and the development of alternate livelihood options. The minimal<br />

impact of ICT as an information dissemination tool is a source of concern. As climatic conditions are changing<br />

it is important to acknowledge that there needs to be robust medical and health care systems and facilities which<br />

can take care of health issues particularly which will be on the rise due to changing climatic conditions. The<br />

need for better financial inclusion and access to more formal systems of finance is pertinent not only to<br />

increasing the capabilities of the women but also the overall adaptive capacity of the household, especially<br />

during crisis situations or climatic shocks. The current study is an attempt to represent the understanding of the<br />

farming community to climate change and therefore the starting point for sensitising the policy makers to work<br />

towards aiming to enhance capabilities on adaptation measures of farmers in the semi-arid regions of India and<br />

mainstreaming of successful adaptation strategies in the agricultural development agenda.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

India, other partner countries are following similar suit.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

MTP Output target 2011 1.10.4 Policy package elements on risk management strategies for mitigating the<br />

impact of risks inherent in rainfed agriculture developed and shared with partners in Asia<br />

46


Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Enhancing Farmers Adaptation to Climate Change in Arid and Semi-<br />

Arid Agriculture of India: Evidences from Indigenous practices<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The paper attempts to explore how global Climate Change (CC) agenda and processes ( covering concerns,<br />

debates, negotiations, research- based projections, impacts and actions etc. broadly collectively termed as “<br />

global discourse” in this paper), can help enhance the farmers ‘adaptations against impacts of CC in arid and<br />

semi–arid regions of India, which is potentially more vulnerable to climate change.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Based on village, farm and plot level information from different studies during last 30 years in different parts of<br />

arid and semi arid areas of India, the paper synthesizes the attributes of the said adaptation strategies. The paper<br />

looks at their relevance in the context of evolving potential responses to impacts of CC in the dry regions of<br />

India. The relevant components of global discourse on CC for their ability to help farmers for enhancing their<br />

adaptation strategies were also looked at.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

Since the climate-linked risks are as old as agriculture in these regions, the farmers have learned to live with<br />

them by evolving various coping measures to minimize the impacts of climatic variability. The short and long<br />

term, as well as individual and collective coping measures against risks form the part of the overall adaptation<br />

strategies of dry land farmers. Based on the intra- regional biophysical and socio- economic differences, the<br />

adaptations show considerable diversity and flexibility as well as gradual change in their contents with the<br />

changing constraints and opportunities. Besides, three points that are central to our discussion on adaptations to<br />

CC can be noted.<br />

First, the highly variable weather (or climate) conditions in the dry regions have shaped the farmers responses or<br />

adaptations in the past. They may offer some insights and clues for evolving place based adaptation strategies to<br />

CC for the future. Second, the farmer's adaptation strategies (with some intra-regional differences) are not<br />

directed to weather variability exclusively. They are addressed to multiple constraints and opportunities<br />

including those having links with climatic variables. Third, the farmers’ adaptations measures not only have<br />

significant diversity and flexibility, but tendency to evolve (change) with the emergence of new opportunities<br />

and constraints. The implications of the above in the context of changing climatic conditions in the dry regions<br />

would include (i) possibility of harnessing the potential complementarities between traditional, farmer- evolved<br />

measures and those generated through modern technologies and management systems, (ii) designing and<br />

harnessing of micro-macro links- based policy-programme interventions to make dry land agriculture and<br />

rural development climate sensitive, (iii) re-orientation of institutions and overall support systems for dry land<br />

agriculture to enhance capacity of dry land communities to withstand the negative impacts of CC.<br />

Any Comments/Explanations:<br />

The paper serves as background for highlighting constraining features of global discourse on climate change<br />

specially its missing links with micro level situations. The dry land agricultural context along with the<br />

traditional adaptation experiences; quantified field observations about adaptations at grass root levels were<br />

illustrated to reflect the diversity and dynamics of farmers’ adaptation measures; farmers’ experience based<br />

perception guiding adaptation strategies and indicative implications and imperatives of the above issues, mainly<br />

in terms of making dry agriculture and rural development climate sensitive.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

India, other partner countries are following similar suit.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Asian Development Bank (ADB)<br />

47


MTP Output target 2011 1.10.4a. A Ph. D dissertation on social networks and technology innovations<br />

completed<br />

Intermediate output target <strong>2010</strong>: Mapping the social network architecture of rural communities:<br />

Insights from two villages in semi-arid tropics of India<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

80%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To date, however, as discerned from the literature, we are still far from being able to understand and design<br />

ways that can harness the full potential of social networks. Understanding when, why, and how social networks<br />

function best is important. It is here that social network analysis plays an important role. More methodological<br />

and conceptual work is needed to understand the network conditions that best help to nurture and support the<br />

many aspects of rural communities. The focus of this study is on the Semi-Arid Tropics (SAT) poor engaged in<br />

agriculture, the marginalized groups especially women.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The study is designed in such a way to include participatory and inter-disciplinary research. These include:<br />

Qualitative methods of data collection. Focus groups meeting with men and women farmers in the two study<br />

locations were conducted to understand the important transactions that people have in these two villages. The<br />

qualitative surveys in Aurepalle and Kanzara were also aimed to understand the villagers’ perceptions about<br />

Technological, policy-related changes and development programs in the village over the past two or<br />

three decades.<br />

Which among these impacted them the most?<br />

What are the different social network groups in the village?<br />

What role did social networks play in the adoption of these technologies and development<br />

interventions?<br />

Based on the analysis of this information, it was decided to focus as case studies: the Self-Help Groups (SHGs)<br />

in Aurepalle and how they influenced welfare outcomes; and the kinship networks in Kanzara for diffusion of a<br />

specific seed technology.<br />

A semi-structured questionnaire was developed to study social networks effectively. The methodology for<br />

understanding village dynamics and social relationships and networks was developed in 2008. A village census<br />

was done to capture village dynamics and social relationships both within and outside the villages. The village<br />

census instrument used in the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> VLS census rounds until 2007 was examined in detail. The VLS census<br />

instrument covered vital statistics on demographic, landholding and asset details of the entire population of the<br />

village. It was strongly recommended by the experts that the 2007 census be methodologically enhanced to<br />

capture village dynamics. Inclusion of key variables measuring relationships, key transactions and networks<br />

among individuals/households in the village was recommended to augment the recently completed 2007 census.<br />

A survey instrument was developed to collect information on the major transactions – economic, socio-culturalpolitical<br />

and technology related – from all adult members in the village. The questionnaire was implemented<br />

after conducting Focus Group Meetings (FGM) and pilot testing the draft questionnaire.<br />

Quantitative analysis using STATA and visual analysis using UCINET software are currently ongoing. This<br />

include mapping of the network architecture (including networks developed either through formal organizations,<br />

kinship groups, neighborhoods networks, work groups, self-help groups, or informal interactions) for<br />

investigating the flow of information, access to new opportunities and identifying the hubs or focal points for<br />

introducing interventions .<br />

The above analysis is complemented by descriptive analysis of these network maps and will address how and<br />

why are social networks fragmented within communities? Which collective benefits could emerge from creation<br />

of new links? How do the networks affect outcomes, etc. Essentially, through a network analysis the patterns of<br />

relations between actors will be mapped.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

a. Analysis of the data on linkages existing in the village: This analysis revealed the different groups existing in<br />

the village and the flow of information. In Kanzara it was found that there are two dominant groups existing in<br />

48


village – the credit society group (dominated by male members of the community) and the women self help<br />

groups. In Aurepalle, a contrasting picture was seen – there are many networks/groups operating the village and<br />

it was observed that people belonged to multiple groups/networks. Women belonged to the self-help groups as<br />

well as the credit society, men were members of the credit society, and they were members of the education<br />

committee and so on. This result raises some questions- what are the reasons for people of Aurepalle to form<br />

diverse networks and be a part of them? Are there cultural, social, economic or political reasons as to why<br />

people of Kanzara are not coming together to from new networks? These can be addressed through the social<br />

network analysis.<br />

b. Mapping the network architecture in the two villages<br />

Step 1: Reorganizing data into matrix form.<br />

As the data collected is very voluminous (about 15,000-20,000 observations approx. per village), it became<br />

difficult for handling in Microsoft Excel. Hence I took training in the use of STATA software for data<br />

management and some analysis. The network maps are drawn using UCINET 6.1 Netdraw tool. To be able to<br />

use this tool, it was mandatory to get all the relationships data into a matrix . Matrices were structured using<br />

STATA.<br />

Step 2: Documenting the network architecture of the village.<br />

The figure below shows a network map for village Aurepalle using a random sample of households. Similar<br />

maps are also developed for village Kanzara.<br />

Figure. A Network map of head of households in Aurepalle using a random sample of households<br />

If the above map is closely examined, it can be noticed that the pie can be cut into two parts or circles. The<br />

centre portion or the core or the inner circle is where the connections between people are dense and well<br />

connected. The periphery on the other hand shows the households/individuals who are not so well connected.<br />

Does this mean they are not well off and or are excluded? The qualitative life histories and the analysis of the<br />

three decades of data available on these households from the <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-VLS will help to get answers to these<br />

questions. The characteristics of the relationships as well as the attributes of the individuals/households – their<br />

caste, class status, other sociological variables like education, family size, risk taking behavior as well as their<br />

asset position and resource endowments – through the descriptive quantitative and qualitative analysis will help<br />

us to understand the outputs – who are connected to whom, why and how; how does this connection influence<br />

the outcomes.<br />

Two social network measures, Betweenness and Closeness, are particularly revealing of a node’s advantageous<br />

or constrained location in a network. The values of both metrics are dependent upon the pattern of connections<br />

that a node is embedded in. Betweenness measures the control a node has over what flows in the network – how<br />

often is this node on the path between other nodes? Closeness measures how easily a node can access what is<br />

available via the network – how quickly can this node reach all others in the network? A combination where a<br />

node has easy access to others, while controlling the access of other nodes in the network, reveals high informal<br />

power.<br />

49


Step 3. Analyzing networks by gender, caste, and transactions<br />

After analyzing the network map of the random sample of households, the next step was to analyse the network<br />

architectures by gender and type of transaction. As an example the network architecture of women in Aurepalle<br />

who are involved in land and labor transactions is presented here. By land and labor transactions here it is<br />

meant women who are involved in sale of land, leasing in or leasing out land for agriculture and crop sowing<br />

purposes, contracting labor for work, providing employment to labor households etc. It was observed that the<br />

connections are loosely arranged and not dense. More often it is a one on one transactions and is not a very well<br />

connected network. The circular nodes depict women while the squares are the men with whom they have these<br />

transactions. The transactions by women are always with men in these activities and there is not even one<br />

transactions between two women. Even if there is a link between two women in this case it is through a male<br />

member. In contrast such a network for men was found to be dense.<br />

A network map of men from one caste group (the Gowda community which is one of the dominant caste groups<br />

in Aurepalle was also mapped. Taking a sample of households which belong to the VLS sample, the network<br />

architecture of these men are documented . The results reveal that 5 households are linked to each other through<br />

one transaction or the other. But one household has no connections with the other members of the community.<br />

Is it the case that this household is poor and therefore has no connections with members of his own caste group?<br />

Or are the connections of this household with people not necessarily from his own caste group? Is it that he<br />

does not indulge in the caste occupation – toddy tapping as he has no date palm trees? Answers to these<br />

questions can be got from an analysis of the VLS data which gives us information about his primary occupation,<br />

his income and asset position, as well as the individual history of the individual and the household. Another<br />

interesting node in this network is the node with id A0109001. This individual has links with people outside the<br />

village and that too with institutions like the Grameen Bank, Mandal Revenue Officer etc. His links with the<br />

people within the village are through his affiliations outside the village. Indepth interviews with him also reveal<br />

that he is the husband of the ex-sarpanch of the village. When his wife was in power he was the one who would<br />

approach the officials for bringing development programs in the village. He is also a money lender within the<br />

village and maintains network with people outside the village to maintain his powerful status in the village.<br />

Another case study is the network architecture of a money lender from a forward caste. As illustrated in the<br />

analysis of the data as well as Focus Group Discussions, he is a powerful hub/node in the village. A close<br />

examination of the predominance of the money lender in the village given that there are other sources of credit<br />

available to the rural poor revealed that the transaction costs of approaching a money lender is still small<br />

compared to approaching the bank or a SHG in the case of women. Also he is able to ensure that the produce is<br />

sold at a better price and the farmer gets some money back after repayment of the loan to the money lender.<br />

Moreover, the money lender also assists the farmer in procuring the needed inputs for crop production. His<br />

links with the outside groups also form a channel for information flows. In the earlier decades, the money lender<br />

was an important focal point in the village as he was the main source of credit to the famers from all class and<br />

caste categories. With the spread of financial institutions in the villages and the women Self Help Groups<br />

which are now the source of micro-credit, and the awareness by the communities of the advantages of these<br />

formal sources of finance, the money lenders have now a limited role to play. They are still popular in the<br />

villages because if the farmer wants a large sum of sum without the hassles of the banking procedures, he/she<br />

still approaches the money lender for financial help. This mapping gives a picture of how important this<br />

node/focal point is in the present economy and for what purposes is this focal point important.<br />

The network table of the money lender (Mr Vattem Rama Rao) in Aurepalle presents an interesting picture. His<br />

transactions now are reduced to more of a socio-cultural-political kind of transactions. He is seen interacting<br />

with people in the village from mostly his own caste group and some other forward caste group members.<br />

About 50% of his transactions are with his relatives either by blood or marriage. His monetary/economic<br />

transactions are again outside the village and include mostly formal financial institutions. As he does not<br />

practice agriculture, he has no transactions related to agricultural technology. Also since he belongs to the<br />

forward caste, he does not have any interactions with people in power (village council) regarding the<br />

development programs as he is not a beneficiary of the programs. He lives alone in the village and his<br />

transactions are mostly limited to his caste group now, which was not the case about 20 years back.<br />

He figures in 120 networks though. As mentioned earlier he still is the source of credit as far as large sums of<br />

money are considered and about 60 people in the village still approach him for economic help. About 50 people<br />

approach him for socio-cultural-political needs (e.g. As a respected person while fixing marriage alliances of<br />

their kith and kin, and to some extent for information regarding formation of SHGs, how to get loans from the<br />

banks, how much interest from the banks etc).<br />

50


c. Case studies<br />

Women Self-help groups in Aurepalle: As mentioned earlier in the report there are about 53 SHGs operating in<br />

Aurepalle. Information on 45 groups has been collected (see example below). These are currently being<br />

analysed using the network data. Network maps both in tabular form as well as in pictorial form will be<br />

developed. The maps of women belonging to SHG will be compared with those maps of women who do not<br />

belong to a SHG will be compared. An in-depth qualitative survey will be conducted to draw further inferences.<br />

Kinship networks in spread of an agricultural innovation in Kanzara: Agriculture is the main traditional<br />

livelihood in Kanzara. Two key features of agriculture in this region are the predominance of cotton and the<br />

practice of intercropping . Cotton is being grown in this region since centuries. From 2005-06 Soybean crop has<br />

been taken up by the villagers and is gradually replace cotton during the kharif season. Cotton and cotton<br />

mixtures are intercropped with sorghum and pulses such as mung and pigeonpea during the Kharif season.<br />

Cropping pattern analysis (see line diagram below) reveals that pigeonpea is grown as in intercrop since many<br />

decades. 1-2 rows between 16-18 rows of cotton and sorghum earlier; now with soybean. Pigeonpea is used for<br />

own consumption and local pigeonpea was mostly grown using the seeds saved by the farmers. Following the<br />

attack of wilt (a disease) for consequent years the progressive farmers requested <strong>ICRISAT</strong> for a wilt resistant<br />

variety of pigeonpea during the late eighties<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> introduced a wilt resistant variety of pigeonpea (ICP 8863) through the LEGOFTEN program in 1987.<br />

5 kgs of seed was distributed among 5 farmers of the village during 1987-1992. Within a span of 5 years this<br />

variety spread throughout the district even in the absence of the state government getting engaged in the<br />

multiplication of the seed. The variety and the seed spread was through friends, relatives and acquaintances<br />

alone. The variety still dominates the pigeonpea production even till 2009 as is evident from the data.<br />

Using focus group meetings and key informant interviews with two farmers who got this seed from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, I<br />

tracked the spread of this technology within the village and outside. Along with Mr VK Chopde, Senior<br />

Scientific Officer at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, we documented the spread and the tracking of the technology through these<br />

meetings. The flow charts depicting tracking the seed technology the of the two farmers gives a complete<br />

picture of the spread of the technology. The two examples show how even in the absence of an apathetic and<br />

inefficient beauracracy technology adoption and diffusion can take place through networks of friends, relatives<br />

and kin. The steps ongoing are now to develop network maps of people who are growing this variety of<br />

pigeonpea and to compare with those not growing pigeonpea if the case may be. Additionally, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

introduced another hybrid variety of pigeonpea in this village in 2008. Mapping to whom this technology was<br />

introduced, where do they appear in the network map of the maruti growers and see the spread of this<br />

technology. This will lead to testing the hypothesis whether introducing an intervention to the members in the<br />

core will lead to faster adoption of the technology or the individual in the periphery will slow down the<br />

diffusion speed.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

: Profs D Parthasarathy, Sarmistah Pattanaik and KN Narayanan<br />

: R Padmaja and MCS Bantilan<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Nil<br />

MTP Output target 2012 1.10.1 Gathering longitudinal data on households, individuals and fields in 42<br />

selected villages in years 1-5 of the project<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Data collection and validation of 2009 data completed<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India and Bangladesh<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The main objective is to enhance the availability of reliable household-, individual-, and field-specific, highfrequency,<br />

time-series data in purposely selected 42 villages in the semi-arid and humid tropics of South Asia.<br />

51


Understanding village-level information and ground realities can act as an important catalyst in accelerating<br />

agricultural and rural development. This project is aimed at creating a premier source of high quality<br />

longitudinal household data in selected regions of South Asia. This will give a voice to the poor and inform<br />

programs and policies that help smallholder farmers lift themselves out of hunger and poverty, alongside<br />

helping shape future agricultural development strategies.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

The household surveys were conducted in 42 selected villages (30 in India and 12 in Bangladesh) using pretested<br />

and well designed interview schedules, namely, General Endowment Schedule (GES), Cultivation<br />

Schedule (Y), Transaction Schedule (L), Employment Schedule (K), Livestock Schedule (Z) and Monthly Price<br />

Schedule (M). GPS coordinates were collected for all households in all the villages to enable geo-referencing of<br />

the data during data analysis. Three frequency modes were employed in data collection, namely, high-frequency<br />

(monthly), seasonal (half-yearly) and annual. The data collection was done by field investigators who resided in<br />

the respective villages. Data checking was done by supervisors at the village level as well as at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Data<br />

entry and validation were done through the double-entry method. In addition, social and resource maps were<br />

drawn by the villagers in 6 VLS villages. Special purpose surveys on Climate Change were undertaken in all<br />

traditional 6 VLS villages in India and 4 villages in Bangladesh. Experimental village grants are being<br />

implemented in the 6 traditional VLS villages.<br />

To ensure high quality in data collection, entry, management and analysis, several trainings, workshops and<br />

orientation programs were organized.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

• Formal project launch meetings and follow-up planning meetings successfully organized for SAT India,<br />

East India and Bangladesh components.<br />

• Survey instruments and methods for collecting quality data were harmonized. Appropriate periodicity for<br />

different survey modules was finalized.<br />

• Data collection through monthly, seasonal and annual frequencies is on schedule in SAT India, East India<br />

and Bangladesh.<br />

• Complementary qualitative data were collected using PRA tools and focus group interviews.<br />

• Customized data entry templates and applications (CS Pro) adapted for all 3 regions and required training<br />

programs on CSPro organized.<br />

• Training of staff for standardized econometric software package (STATA application) completed in May<br />

<strong>2010</strong> for SAT India.<br />

• Guidelines for mid-course monitoring and corrections to improve data quality both during data collection<br />

and data entry/validation established for use in all three regions.<br />

• Half yearly review meetings were conducted in all the three regions to ensure timely collection and<br />

processing of data.<br />

• Project Annual Review Meeting was held on 22 November <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

• Special Session on VDSA was organized during the 18 th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics<br />

Research Association held at NAARM, Hyderabad on 20 November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NCAP, IRRI, SocioConsult, CPD<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> -Integrating gender issues in the VDSA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

20%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

To integrate gender issues in VDSA project<br />

52


Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

The basic survey questionnaires are enhanced with specific questions focusing on gender aspects. These include:<br />

• Roles and responsibilities - Labor and time allocation<br />

• Decision making roles and responsibilities<br />

• Employment<br />

• Access to and control over resources for crop production<br />

• Access to and control over benefits from crop produce; utilization of crop products and by-products<br />

• Coping mechanisms during shocks<br />

• Access and benefit from government/development programs<br />

Data for 2009 on different gender issues (as per point # 1) are being validated, analyzed and publications are<br />

under the production process. Anthropometric tools/equipment – digital weigh balance (for adults); height rod<br />

(adults); infantometer (for weight and height recording for 0-18 months age group); tape for measuring arm<br />

circumference have been delivered from SEACA, Germany. Distribution of one full set per village is<br />

completed. Training on taking accurate measurements using anthropometric equipments were given to all the<br />

field investigators by resource persons from National Institute of Nutrition (NIN).<br />

A special module on nutrition, health, sanitation and gender is being planned for commencement under the<br />

project. This may include collaborations with NIN and University of Pennsylvania among others.<br />

Field investigators are also trained on collecting information specific to gender issues, and qualitative tools. In<br />

addition to the above, women farmers were also included in the farmers trips/excursions to different agricultural<br />

research stations in the region as well as some historical, social and cultural places of interest.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

IRRI, NCAP, CPD, Socioconsult<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target <strong>2010</strong> – Special session on VDSA at the 18th Annual Conference of the<br />

Agricultural Economics Research Association (AERA)<br />

Achievement of Output Target<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

“Creating strong public-private partnerships and involving a larger number of stakeholders creates a selfsustaining<br />

value chain with critical inputs reaching farmers in a timely manner and quality commodities<br />

reaching end users,” said Director General William Dar at the 18th Annual Conference of the Agricultural<br />

Economics Research Association (AERA).<br />

As Guest of Honor and Keynote Speaker, Dr Dar appropriately set the tone of the conference by elaborating on<br />

the theme and citing examples of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s successes in value chain enhancement, namely the Agri-Business<br />

Incubator, a pioneer in agri-business incubation in India; <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s promotion of sweet sorghum with its<br />

multi-product potential as a viable crop for bio-ethanol production; and the project where small-scale sorghum<br />

and pearl millet farmers were successfully and profitably organized into Farmers’ Associations who were then<br />

linked to industrial end users.<br />

The GT-IMPI team (Drs Cynthia Bantilan, P Parthasarathy Rao, V Kiresur, Uttam Kumar Deb, Naveen Singh<br />

and other Scientific Officers and Visiting Scientists) organized a special session entitled, “Exploring<br />

Development Pathways through Village Dynamic Studies”, where participants were exposed to the VDS and<br />

deliberated on options for analyzing these data towards addressing key issues for creating policy<br />

recommendations in the agriculture sector.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NCAP<br />

53


Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target <strong>2010</strong> – Consultations and discussions with project advisory members<br />

Extensive discussions and consultations with Dr Hans Binswanger were undertaken during April <strong>2010</strong> on the<br />

implementation of the VDSA project, learning’s so far , mid-course corrections if any, constraints faced and<br />

evolving solutions, and future plans under the project.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Village Dynamics Studies (VLS) in West Africa<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

75%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger and Burkina Faso<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

In twelve villages of Burkina Faso & Niger, data are being collected using about 26 modules. Used costaccounting<br />

method to collect data at village, household and plot data using 25 modules: Household sociodemographic<br />

profile, Land stocks, Plot characteristics, Weights and units of measurements<br />

Transactions on agricultural products (Sale of agricultural products and gifts received, Purchase of agricultural<br />

products and gifts given, Sale of animals and gifts given, Purchase of animals and gifts received), Labor use<br />

(Family labor, Hired labor, Family labor sale on agricultural activities), Price of agricultural products in the<br />

market, Purchase of inputs, household investment and expenditures (Expenditures on durable assets,<br />

Expenditures on consumable goods), Off-farm revenues, Food consumption, Crop stocks flows, Livestock<br />

flows, Migration, Remittances, Use of oil and water conservation measures, Risks and calamities, Climate<br />

change, Agricultural equipment, Credit (Borrowing, Lending), Split households since the 1980, Food security<br />

and poverty proxy, Household affiliation to institutions, Household durable assets<br />

Main findings/Results:<br />

Data collection for year 1 is ongoing.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

IFPRI, INRAN and INERA<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

West Africa: Assessing the dynamics of poverty and land degradation in the Sahelian countries of West Africa<br />

from IDRC.<br />

MTP Output target 2012 1.10.2 Assembly of secondary agricultural meso-level data into an integrated<br />

database updated, expanded in coverage, extended in geographic area and decentralized in level of aggregation<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

25%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> is maintaining district level database for India that includes data on area and production under major<br />

crops, land use, crop wise irrigated area, source wise irrigation, farm harvest prices, fertilizer consumption,<br />

rainfall, infrastructure variables like road length, and markets, land holding size and census data relating to<br />

human and livestock population. The database spans 512 districts in India covering 16 states (now 19 states,<br />

with the formation of 3 new states).<br />

54


A number of research papers have been produced using this database. For example, documenting cropping<br />

pattern changes, supply response functions, typology of agriculture, factors influencing livestock density and<br />

productivity and more recently on factors influencing Diversification of Agriculture in India. The main<br />

objective is to provide one stop shop for meso level database.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Recently formed districts and other relevant geo-political boundaries have been identified in all three project<br />

regions (Sat India, Eastern India, and Bangladesh) and methodologies of dealing with them have been developed<br />

that will ensure the consistency of the data across all regions. The methodology that is being followed for all<br />

three regions is to collect the data according to the new district/province boundaries. Data from earlier years is<br />

apportioned according to the land area of the original (1966) boundaries for India and boundaries for<br />

Bangladesh. Data will be reported according to the new boundaries.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

For SAT India the existing district level database has been updated till 2007 for the 8 states in the region. The<br />

variables available in the database are crop area and production, land use, irrigation, agro-climatic variables,<br />

livestock, farm harvest prices, fertilizer consumption, roads, credit, monthly rainfall data, wages and markets.<br />

Additional variables have been identified that are relevant to the over-arching VDSA project objectives such as<br />

GDP per capita, literacy rates, poverty ratios, sectoral shifts, infrastructure indices, and welfare programs are<br />

being collected at the district level from 2000. A similar undertaking is also underway in north India for the<br />

northern and eastern states of India, however, owing to delays in the project implementation, the data collection<br />

and updating in this region is currently ongoing.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>, meso-data collection for Bangladesh was collected at two levels: region level and district level. At the<br />

region level, area, production and yield data for six major crops (Aus Rice, Aman Rice, Boro Rice, Wheat, Jute<br />

and Potato) for all 22 regions of Bangladesh for the period 1981/82-2009/10 were collected, processed,<br />

validated and submitted to the BMGF. At the district level, area, production and yield data for five major crops<br />

(Aus Rice, Aman Rice, Boro Rice, Wheat and Potato) for all 64 districts of Bangladesh for the period 2003/04-<br />

2009/10 were collected, processed, validated and submitted to the BMGF.<br />

We are in the process of building comprehensive time series data set that would include more detailed climatic<br />

and infrastructure variables initially for the districts in the states on Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and<br />

Karnataka. Besides rainfall, minimum and maximum temperature, humidity, wind velocity and soft<br />

infrastructure variables like education institutions, health centers, livestock institutions etc. from 1970-71 to<br />

2007-08 (or for the available years) have been collected for Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.<br />

Additionally the data set includes daily temperature and humidity data for Andhra Pradesh (20 districts) and<br />

selected districts of Maharashtra. In order to collect the time series data from rare government publications in<br />

Andhra Pradesh for the above variables, these documents were photographed and then entered into the database<br />

at the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> headquarters. The data set for Andhra Pradesh will be ready for analysis by end Decemeber<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Such a comprehensive data base would enable in-depth analysis of the impact of climate change on crops<br />

and analysis of supply response, and role of infrastructure in agriculture development.<br />

Digitized GIS maps for SAT and Eastern India are available and have been used to carry out spatial analysis for<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops and presented in various workshops/conferences. .<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, IRRI, NCAP, CPD<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

MTP Output target 2012 1.10.3. Capacity building for NARS scientists and regional scientists in the design<br />

and execution of household panel surveys, data processing technologies and time-series panel data analysis<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved<br />

India<br />

55


Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Building analytical capacity of staff through training in STATA and<br />

meso-data analysis<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

Strengthening of in-house institutional analytical capacity to conduct analysis on the micro- and meso-data<br />

Methodology/Approach: Training with internal and external subject experts and combining both theoretical and<br />

practical approaches. With special emphasis on hands on experience.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

GT-IMPI organized a training course on Econometric Methods and Applications using STATA (Data Analysis<br />

and Statistical Software) from 25 to 31 May at Patancheru. The training course emphasized the need for timely,<br />

accurate and robust analysis of the data collected under the Village Dynamics Studies, combining both<br />

quantitative and qualitative variables, at the micro- and meso levels. This training course was primarily aimed at<br />

social scientists and support staff. It is envisioned that their skills in econometric analysis using STATA will be<br />

enriched under the able guidance of experts in the field. The coordinator for this training course was S<br />

Madheswaran from the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore. He was ably supported by Subir<br />

Sen from the Energy and Resource Institute, New Delhi and Badri Narayana Rath from IIT- Hyderabad.<br />

Workshops on data collection for meso-data were undertaken at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in order to train NARS partners on<br />

the appropriate methodologies for data collection, validation and analysis. Seminars and lectures on the<br />

relevance of meso-data in socio-economic research, particularly in the writing of village profiles, were<br />

conducted for a wide cross section of people ranging from NARS partner scientists to field investigators.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates foundation<br />

Intermediate output target <strong>2010</strong> - VDSA M&E through annual and mid-term project training cum review<br />

meetings<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The program aimed at reviewing the progress made by the resident field investigators during the last year and at<br />

receiving feedback on the survey work and their stay in the villages.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

A 4-day Mid-Term Review Workshop-cum-Training program from 24 to 27 August, <strong>2010</strong> was organized by<br />

the VDSA team of the Global Theme on Institutions, Markets, Policy and Impacts (GT-IMPI). As many as 19<br />

field investigators, one each from the 18 target villages spread across five states of SAT India, namely, Andhra<br />

Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, and a lady field investigator from Patancheru<br />

actively participated in the workshop. Project Leader and GTL MCS Bantilan highlighted the importance of<br />

quality data collection as well as analysis including publishing as critical outputs of the project. She also<br />

reiterated and impressed upon the resident field investigators to publish the field observations and analysis as a<br />

pathway for their career progression. VR Kiresur, P Parthasarathy Rao and UK Deb gave a brief account of the<br />

progress achieved in the project during its first year. The capacity building component of the workshop<br />

included sessions on qualitative data collection methods (by R Padmaja), computer assisted personal interview<br />

instruments (by GV Anupama), soil sampling method for soil analysis (by IYLN Murthy from DOR,<br />

Hyderabad), method of usage of rain gauges (by NN Srivastava from CRIDA, Hyderabad), use of<br />

anthropometric equipment (by K Mallikarjuna Rao and Sree Rama Krishna from NIN, Hyderabad). The third<br />

day was totally devoted to a village immersion at Aurepalle village, Mahbubnagar district of Andhra Pradesh.<br />

Field investigators, supervisors and data entry operators were divided into four groups for a mock household<br />

survey organized to appreciate the effort of quality data collection at field level. The workshop ended on the<br />

fourth day with the finalization of work plans for each of the villages under all the three objectives envisaged in<br />

the project.<br />

56


A similar training-cum-Project Review Workshop of the Bangladesh Component of the Village Dynamics in<br />

South Asia (VDSA) Project was successfully organized during 7-9 May <strong>2010</strong>, at the Socioconsult, Dhaka,<br />

Bangladesh. The workshop started with a visit to Nishaiganj village of Mymensingh district, which is one of the<br />

twelve villages selected for implementing the VDSA project in Bangladesh. A major shift from rice cultivation<br />

to fish farming in Nishaiganj was one example of the rapidity of village dynamics, which are being tracked in<br />

the project.<br />

MCS Bantilan gave an overview of the project to the Bangladesh VDSA team. The project was reviewed<br />

following the presentation of the achievements of the Bangladesh component in the first year by Alamgir<br />

Chowdhury (Socioconsult) and UK Deb (Center for Policy Dialogue). VR Kiresur and P Parthasarathy Rao<br />

imparted training to the Bangladesh team including field investigators, programmers and data entry operators on<br />

the quantitative methodologies for village/household surveys and meso/macro data collection. R Padmaja and<br />

Rupsha Banerjee guided the participants on the use of qualitative tools for data collection. Naveen Singh and H<br />

Padmini also participated and contributed to the successful organization of the workshop.<br />

A one day annual review meeting of the project was also organized back to back to the AERA Conference on<br />

November 22, <strong>2010</strong>. All project partners from SAT India, East India and Bangladesh actively participated in<br />

this meeting. The morning session focused on knowledge gaps and research needs under the Village dynamics<br />

studies for the three regions namely SAT India, eastern India and Bangladesh. Extensive discussions by the<br />

participants in identifying knowledge gaps and research needs were undertaken keeping in mind the focus of the<br />

project as well as the ultimate outcomes desired. The session also had presentations on women’s contribution to<br />

rural economic activities in India and Bangladesh. Discussions on gaps and research needs in this area was very<br />

interactive and explanatory. The session ended with a good discussion on all the issues presented and discussed<br />

in the forenoon.<br />

The afternoon session dealt with discussion on researchable issues, small grants, co-funding plans and<br />

development and finalization of work-plans by regions namely SAT India region, East India region and<br />

Bangladesh. Dr MCS Bantilan opened the session with introduction on the project management issues like<br />

grants, co funding and work plan for the coming year, highlighting 3 key points – a. not to lose focus of the<br />

project; harnessing the data collected by making comparative and stimulating analysis across 42 villages; spatial<br />

analysis with the geo-referenced data. She also requested the participants to focus on research prioritization for<br />

the forth coming competitive grant projects. She also emphasized on innovative analytical prowess looking into<br />

panel data under VDSA project.<br />

Various researchable issues were highlighted by Drs PK Joshi, MCS Bantilan, NS Jodha, Anjani Kumar, VR<br />

Kiresur, P Parthasarathy Rao and Uttam Kumar Deb. 10 broad researchable areas were summarized:<br />

1. Typology of poor under different rainfall regimes<br />

2. Land markets and new dimensions of land market emerging<br />

3. Labor markets after initiation of the schemes – eg NREGA in India, so also similar programs in<br />

implementation in Bangladesh<br />

4. Technology profiling in SAT and humid regions – compare and contrast<br />

5. Water markets<br />

6. Service sector<br />

7. Delivery mechanism – especially inputs and governance of the schemes<br />

8. Income diversification for livelihood options<br />

9. Documenting innovative institutions and how they are helping the poor to get out of poverty<br />

10. Agriculture vis-à-vis health and education<br />

Dr Bantilan supplemented the above discussion with a reiteration that there is a need to understand, document<br />

and analyze the emerging micro-level issues identified through micro level data and upscale the findings and<br />

policy implication through meso-level data analysis. There has to be convergence of the meso- and micro-level<br />

data such that the ground level insights on the emerging issues will be able to provide compelling research<br />

response and ultimately achieve impact. Cross-cutting gender-related issues to be identified eg. Analysis of<br />

tenancy and land fragmentation in East India with a gender perspective.<br />

The achievements for the three objectives in SAT India region, EAST Indian region and Bangladesh were<br />

presented by the respective objective leaders and coordinators. Workplans for the following year were discussed<br />

in detail. The proposed workplan for 2011 includes Complete digitization of PRA maps; Organizing CSPro<br />

training; Finalize CSPro data-entry templates development; Computer entry of 2009-<strong>2010</strong> HH data; HH Data<br />

collection for <strong>2010</strong>-2011; Computer entry of <strong>2010</strong>-2011 HH data; Finalize template for meso-data; Collection<br />

57


and entry of meso-data; Analyze micro and meso level data; Publish profiles of 12 villages; review papers on<br />

poverty and food security in SAT India, East India and Bangladesh. The publications and dissemination strategy<br />

was also discussed and highlighted.<br />

Dave Hoisington, DDG, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in his concluding comments, after actively participating in the days<br />

proceedings, impressed upon the ethical issues to be carefully considered in data collection as well as<br />

dissemination of the data to the wider audience through the website.<br />

Dr Bantilan also proposed that Dave Hoisington be part of the Advisory Panel for the project. She reminded the<br />

group to keep the basic guiding principles of the project discussed in the morning session:<br />

• Raising the voices of the poor<br />

• Quality data and analysis<br />

• IPG<br />

• Highest priority for capacity building of South Asian researchers<br />

• Methodology building and developments both quantitative and qualitative components of the project<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, IRRI, NCAP, CPD<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

MTP Output target 2012 1.11.1 Database and documentation of VLS baseline data for SAT India, East India<br />

and Bangladesh; VLS information portal developed<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>- Database management and documentation of VLS data for SAT India<br />

initiated<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

40%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

A data mining expert Prof. TV Prabhakar from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kanpur was hired as a<br />

resource person for an exploratory workshop entitled ‘Developing concept maps, models and relational<br />

databases for GT-IMPI Databases’ held on Saturday 21 August. As per his advice, preparations were started for<br />

setting up a data warehouse with OLAP features. A concept map and mind map depicting the different entities<br />

in the VLS and district level databases and their inter-relations were developed. These maps provide the viewers<br />

an overall view of the databases including the survey locations, the key features, detailed survey modules,<br />

methodology, censuses and special purpose surveys.<br />

We are exploring the external warehouse service providers, particularly IBM, Oracle and Microsoft. Good<br />

progress was made with IBM-Envision. They visited <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to find out the requirements, studied the data,<br />

worked with a sample to produce snapshot reports. They also presented a seminar showcasing their capabilities<br />

using the sample reports. Oracle also visited <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to study the existing system and requirements. We are<br />

also working with Sonata on a possible solution from them. The different vendors are expected to suggest the<br />

necessary hardware requirements, the suitable software, provide necessary technical support and required<br />

training for the sustainability of the project. The Data management unit at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> is playing a key role in this<br />

aspect. This external agency will also be helping us in developing a high standard VLS portal.<br />

Alongside database development, the information portal or the website for hosting VDSA is being developed.<br />

All the static pages of the project are ready and being edited. The pages for database posting are being<br />

developed. This also includes data documentations.<br />

After extensive search, with World Bank advice, three Samsung UMPC q1-ultra model CAPI instruments were<br />

purchased for data collection. These instruments will be piloted one each in three districts, namely<br />

Mahbubnagar, Sholapur and Akola. Each of them costed around 1.5K US$. We have also purchased Reliance<br />

internet data cards for these instruments for easy transmission of the data from villages to Patancheru. We are<br />

planning on the job training for the investigators in April on the usage of these instruments. Both hard copy<br />

58


questionnaires and CAPI will be implemented in these villages for a minimum of 6 months to test the efficiency of the new instrument. Based on the<br />

performance this system will be extended to other villages in the coming years.<br />

The development of summary files at plot, household and individual level is in progress. Plot summary files for<br />

the 6 old VLS villages from 1975-2008 were completed. For the same time period, per capita and per household<br />

incomes from various sources like migration, caste occupations, farm labor, non-farm labor, agriculture,<br />

livestock, remittances, rents and interests were also computed and preliminary poverty estimations were done.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

IRRI, NCAP, CPD<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong>: Development of databases for household and meso-level datasets,<br />

documentation of databases and development of VLS website.<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

30%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

The main objective of this activity is to sharply increase the availability of household panel dataset and mesodata<br />

sets, across regions and years, for decision making on development issues to reduce impoverishment in<br />

poverty-laden regions in the semi-arid and humid tropics of South Asia. Hence, database development and<br />

management assumes prime importance. Access to these data sets through web would enhance the ability of the<br />

development researchers and policy analysts in evidence-based policy recommendations.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

CSPro data entry software is adopted for entry and validation of household panel data in all the three regions.<br />

This software is freely downloadable and widely used for surveys and censuses. CSPro was customized to suit<br />

the requirements of the three regions. Double entry method of data feeding was followed to check data entry<br />

errors. Data documentation manual was prepared for supply to data users. Development of data warehousing<br />

system would ensure efficient data management and user friendly data extraction.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

• Customized data entry software has been developed in CS-Pro.<br />

• Computation of the estimates of synthesized key summary variables based on the longitudinal datasets, at<br />

plot level, individual level and household level is in progress. These variables include crop output, crop<br />

income and expenditure, net returns, household income from different sources, assets value, food and<br />

nonfood consumptions etc. These summary files will be also part of the website under open access.<br />

• Training of staff for standardized econometric software package- STATA – application completed in May<br />

<strong>2010</strong> for SAT India.<br />

• To handle the datasets collected earlier in previous VLS rounds, documentation for the VLS database for<br />

the year 2001-04 is completed. This documentation along with the standardized survey instruments will be<br />

uploaded on the website.<br />

• Documentation of the existing meso-database has been completed from 1966 to 1999 for uploading the data<br />

on the webpage.<br />

• Database management protocols are being designed with the assistance of Knowledge Management and<br />

Sharing Unit (KMS) at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

• VDSA Project Website is developed, which is yet to be hosted.<br />

• Development of data warehousing systems is in progress.<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NCAP, IRRI, SocioConsult<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

59


Intermediate Output Target <strong>2010</strong>: District level data base development of VDSA locations<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

25%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh<br />

Objectives/Rationale:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> is maintaining district level database for India that includes data on area and production under major<br />

crops, land use, crop wise irrigated area, source wise irrigation, farm harvest prices, fertilizer consumption,<br />

rainfall, infrastructure variables like road length, and markets, land holding size and census data relating to<br />

human and livestock population. The database spans 512 districts in India covering 16 states (now 19 states,<br />

with the formation of 3 new states).<br />

A number of research papers have been produced using this database. For example, documenting cropping<br />

pattern changes, supply response functions, typology of agriculture, factors influencing livestock density and<br />

productivity and more recently on factors influencing Diversification of Agriculture in India. The main<br />

objective is to provide one stop shop for meso level database.<br />

Methodology/Approach:<br />

Recently formed districts and other relevant geo-political boundaries have been identified in all three project<br />

regions (Sat India, Eastern India, and Bangladesh) and methodologies of dealing with them have been developed<br />

that will ensure the consistency of the data across all regions. The methodology that is being followed for all<br />

three regions is to collect the data according to the new district/province boundaries. Data from earlier years is<br />

apportioned according to the land area of the original (1966) boundaries for India and boundaries for<br />

Bangladesh. Data will be reported according to the new boundaries.<br />

Main findings/Results & Policy Implications:<br />

For SAT India the existing district level database has been updated till 2007 for the 8 states in the region. The<br />

variables available in the database are crop area and production, land use, irrigation, agro-climatic variables,<br />

livestock, farm harvest prices, fertilizer consumption, roads, credit, monthly rainfall data, wages and markets.<br />

Additional variables have been identified that are relevant to the over-arching VDSA project objectives such as<br />

GDP per capita, literacy rates, poverty ratios, sectoral shifts, infrastructure indices, and welfare programs are<br />

being collected at the district level from 2000.<br />

A similar undertaking is also underway in north India and Bangladesh. However, owing to delays in the project<br />

implementation, the data collection and updating in those regions is currently ongoing.<br />

We are in the process of building comprehensive time series data set that would include more detailed climatic<br />

and infrastructure variables initially for the districts in the states on Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and<br />

Karnataka. Besides rainfall, minimum and maximum temperature, humidity, wind velocity and soft<br />

infrastructure variables like education institutions, health centers, livestock institutions etc. from 1970-71 to<br />

2007-08 (or for the available years) have been collected for Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.<br />

Additionally the data set includes daily temperature and humidity data for Andhra Pradesh (20 districts) and<br />

selected districts of Maharashtra. In order to collect the time series data from rare government publications in<br />

Andhra Pradesh for the above variables, these documents were photographed and then entered into the database<br />

at the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> headquarters. The data set for Andhra Pradesh will be ready for analysis by end Decemeber<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Such a comprehensive data base would enable in-depth analysis of the impact of climate change on crops<br />

and analysis of supply response, and role of infrastructure in agriculture development.<br />

Digitized GIS maps for SAT and Eastern India are available and have been used to carry out spatial analysis for<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandate crops and presented in various workshops/conferences. .<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, IRRI, NCAP, CPD<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation<br />

60


Intermediate output target in <strong>2010</strong> District level meso database management<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

25%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Bangladesh<br />

Progress of work:<br />

Documentation of the existing database has been completed from 1966 to 1999 for uploading the data on the<br />

webpage. The data collection and validation will be stepped up in <strong>2010</strong> to meet the first output of the objective<br />

slated for first quarter on 2011.<br />

61


MTP Project 2:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Sustaining biodiversity of Sorghum, Pearl Millet, Small Millets,<br />

Groundnut, Pigeonpea and Chickpea for current and future<br />

generations<br />

HD Upadhyaya<br />

Highlights for <strong>2010</strong><br />

In our quest to identify genetic resources for useful traits in our mandate crops, two vegetable<br />

pigeonpea accessions, ICP 12772 and ICP 12059, have been identified as asymptomatic (0% incidence)<br />

for both Fusarium wilt and Sterility mosaic disease (SMD) compared to the control , where the<br />

incidence was more than 90%.<br />

A large number of accessions were evaluated to identify sources for trait enhancement for yield and<br />

quality traits in chickpea, groundnut, pearl millet and sorghum.<br />

In chickpea several early maturing lines with high yield potential were identified for normal (winter)<br />

sown irrigated and rainfed situations and late sown (spring) irrigated conditions when temperatures are<br />

high and heat stress is a problem. ICC 5597, 5829, 12426 and 14368 among the desi types performed<br />

better than control ICCV 92944 in all environments. A few kabuli types such as ICC 14197, 14284 and<br />

18591 had acceptable yield level under heat stress conditions but were at par with control in the winter<br />

season. Among the large-seeded newly introduced kabuli types, ICC 19763 was early (107 d), extralarge<br />

seeded (73.1 g) and high yielding (2 t ha -1 ), compared to the best control, KAK 2, under irrigated<br />

while ICC 19449 (55.4 g) was at par with control under rainfed conditions. Evaluation of 35 early<br />

maturing desi and kabuli lines for heat tolerance/resistance, we identified ICC 14346 as the most stable<br />

line for both cool and hot seasons. Another nine desi types and three kabuli were identified as<br />

promising for heat tolerance. A new salinity tolerant line, ICC 11121(2.43 t ha -1 compared to control,<br />

2.38 t ha -1 ) was identified for irrigated environment, while ICC 4593 and 9942 were at par with the<br />

control, CSG 8962 (1.68 t ha-1), under rainfed situation.<br />

In groundnut, promising confectionary, salinity, drought, BND and defoliation tolerant lines were<br />

identified. Among confectionary types ICG 5662, 9127, 12199 (60-82 g 100 seeds -1 ) were at par or<br />

better than control, Somnath (71 g) for yield during post-rainy season and ICG 5690, 8268, 9127 and<br />

12199 (45-51 g) were better than Somnath (45 g) during rainy season. For salinity tolerance, ICG<br />

11426, during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy and ICG 6022 during 2009-10 post-rainy seasons performed better than<br />

control. Among drought tolerant lines, ICG 14426, 02286, 94169 and 92206 during rainy season and<br />

ICG 02286, 94169, 01328 and 86011 during post-rainy season were superior to the controls. Two lines,<br />

ICG 13099, 14710 (1.54-1.58 t ha -1 ) identified for their transpiration efficiency produced higher yield<br />

than controls (1.37-1.48 t ha -1 ). In yield potential evaluation, 12 (1.37 – 1.88 t ha -1 ) accessions<br />

produced significantly higher yield than the control cultivars (0.69-1.36 t ha -1 ).<br />

In pearl millet, 360 fodder type accessions exhibited great diversity for fodder traits such as, plant<br />

height (143-441 cm), tiller number (1-18), leaf number (9-20), leaf length (60-78 cm), leaf width (24-<br />

44 mm) and late flowering (up to 128 days). The promising accessions were 14 for stem thickness, 9<br />

for leaf width, 4 for high leaf number, 61 for plant height and 46 for high tiller number. Evaluation of<br />

the mini core (238 accessions) for agronomic traits led to the identification of promising lines for early<br />

flowering (7), plant height (40), panicle number per plant (4), panicle length (42) and panicle thickness<br />

(31). There was a large and differential response among the accessions for heat tolerance. While some<br />

accessions performed well in rainy season, some were best in the hot summer season and a few were<br />

very stable and good in both seasons. Heat stress accelerated the life cycle in some and slowed down in<br />

others in both seasons and had no effect on some others. A group of accessions were selected for a<br />

detailed study of heat tolerance in the pearl millet during 2011.<br />

In sorghum, 242 mini core accessions, 103 new germplasm lines and 574 <strong>ICRISAT</strong> genebank lines<br />

were phenotyped during <strong>2010</strong>. A large diversity was observed among the lines and the data analysis is<br />

in progress. Accessions (12) belonging to wild species such as S. aethiopicvum (20), S. verticilliflorum<br />

(4), S. virgatum (40) and S. arundinaceum (2) were characterized.<br />

In evaluation of chickpea accessions for disease resistance, 21 lines to Ascochyta blight, 93 for<br />

botrytis grey mold, 2 for dry root rot, and 2 for collar rot were found to be moderately resistant while<br />

62


30 lines were asymptomatic for Fusarium wilt. Considerable variation for resistance to Helicoverpa<br />

was observed among the germplasm lines and selection based on detached leaf assay and field<br />

infestation could be used as for selecting tolerant lines. Under natural infestation in field ICC 3737 was<br />

promising, other lines showing lower susceptibility to damage by H. armigera and a yield potential of<br />

>1000 kg ha -1 under unprotected conditions were identified for distribution to NARS partners for use in<br />

breeding program.<br />

We regenerated a total of 11,816 accessions in field and 262 accessions in special/controlled<br />

environment facilities at Patancheru and 696 accessions in Niger during <strong>2010</strong>. We tested the seed<br />

viability of 8952 accessions at Patancheru and 5540 at Sadore, Niger during the reported period. A total<br />

of 1029 germplasm accessions were monitored for seed health and 490 accessions were completely<br />

free from pathogens. We processed 6,755 accessions for the active collection and 1,443 accessions for<br />

the base collection, resulting in conservation of 90.7% accessions in base collection. Additionally,<br />

22,000 accessions were deposited in Svalbard Global Seed Vault, Norway as safety backup during the<br />

reporting period. A total of 11,791 accessions were conserved in duplicate freezer at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niamey<br />

at -20 0 C.<br />

Gaps in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> database were also updated resulting in availability of 97% characterization and<br />

evaluation data in our databases. Gaps in pearl millet passport databases were identified and published<br />

in a journal article in Plant Genetic Resources – Characterization and evaluation. To promote the<br />

utilization of pearl millet Germplasm in West and Central Africa, we evaluated 81 accessions at<br />

Sadore, Niger. Several accessions were identified for traits such as: presence of long awns, compact<br />

panicle with higher grain density, early maturing, striga tolerant and wide adaptation. PQL facilitated<br />

the export of 19,263 seed samples of staple crops to 46 countries during <strong>2010</strong>. A total of 26 import<br />

permit requests were processed, 1,123 samples were imported during <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> has the global responsibility of collection and conservation of small millets in addition to the<br />

mandate crops. During <strong>2010</strong> we assembled 70 unique small millets accessions and identified 2,314<br />

unique accessions for safety backup at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Finger millet and foxtail millet core accessions were<br />

evaluated in multilocational trials at five locations. Based on these evaluations, we identified 10<br />

accessions for early flowering (


esistant to neck and finger blast. Similarly 7 foxtail millet accessions resistant to neck and panicle<br />

blast and 7 to sheath blast, 10 accessions for grain yield potential and wider adaptability, 5 each for<br />

salinity and transpiration efficiency (TE), 4 for protein, 2 for calcium, 2 for Iron and one for zinc<br />

content were identified.<br />

Sorghum reference set was evaluated for drought tolerance traits and TE and we observed a 10-fold<br />

range for seed yield and harvest index (HI), 2-fold for TE and 1.25-fold for water extraction.<br />

Chickpea mini core was evaluated for tolerance to salinity, from 2005 to 2009 and 9 lines consistently<br />

tolerant to salinity were identified. Similarly we identified 14 salinity tolerant lines in groundnut mini<br />

core collection. Chickpea mini core was evaluated under two soil moisture conditions and a wide range<br />

of ∆13C was observed. Chickpea reference set was genotyped with DArT marker and marker<br />

associated with various traits such as root volume, root length, root dry weight, root surface area, root<br />

depth and root length density, and carbon isotope discrimination were identified. Diversity analyzed for<br />

the markers associated with drought related traits in chickpea and marker associated with drought<br />

related traits such as total dry weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, root depth, root length were<br />

identified. Groundnut reference set was genotyped with 154 SSR Markers and a wide range of<br />

variation was observed for polymorphic information content (PIC) and gene diversity. Wild and<br />

cultivated accessions clustered separately and similar pattern was observed in grouping based on<br />

species, sub-species and genomes.<br />

Assessed genetic diversity of sorghum composite collection based on 41 SSR markers and a journal<br />

article prepared and submitted to BMC Plant Biology. Similarly genetic diversity of pearl millet<br />

composite collection analyzed and a reference set capturing 95% alleles of composite collection<br />

selected. Data sets of pearl millet, finger millet, foxtail millet were prepared and delivered to GCP and<br />

made available via internet.<br />

Assessed genetic diversity of foxtail millet composite collection and selected a reference set of 200<br />

genetically most diverse accessions capturing 87.3% alleles of the composite collection.<br />

Regenerated the seed of sorghum and pigeonpea reference sets and extracted DNA of chickpea, finger<br />

millet and groundnut mini core and reference sets and RILs and made available on request. To broaden<br />

the genetic base of cultivated groundnut, and introduce useful traits, A. chiquitana was crossed with<br />

cultivated groundnut and BC 3 F 4 generation screened for A. flavus. Progenies with resistance to A.<br />

flavus and low aflatoxin production were selected. Tetraploid hybrids between synthetic and cultivated<br />

groundnut generated. Cytological analysis showed maximum recombinations, high pollen fertility and<br />

good seed sets. Advanced generation stable C. platycarpus derivatives were screened for a range of<br />

desirable traits and found lines with low damage due to H. armigera, pod fly and bruchids in<br />

pigeonpea.<br />

Allele specific sequence diversity in chickpea reference set was studied. The candidate gene<br />

sequencing based association genetic approach on reference set of chickpea showed the association of<br />

two genes with drought tolerance traits. Of the 80 SSRs screened on five genotypes, 71 were found<br />

functional. Additionally SSR primer pairs were designed for 688 ESTs of chickpea 657 EST of<br />

heterologous (closely related to chickpea) species. Primer pairs were designed and synthesized for<br />

1152 SSRs in groundnut and a set of 3200 genomic SSRs developed in pigeonpea.<br />

A dense genetic map comprising of 1291 marker loci developed and efforts made to develop a<br />

transcript map of chickpea. A total of 3213 SSRs were screened on 3 groundnut populations to<br />

construct three individual linkage maps in groundnut. To identify most appropriate tool and approach<br />

to identify SNP based on short reads in a species like chickpea, NGS pipeline has been developed and<br />

made available through internet.<br />

A total of 137 Actinomycetes isolated from 25 different herbal vermin composts were characterized for<br />

their antagonistic potential against Fusarium oxysporium. A total of 8 Actinomycetes were identified<br />

by 16S rDNA analysis.<br />

A total of 35 plant growth promoting bacteria and Actinomycetes were freeze dried for long term<br />

conservation. We supplied 1009 units of carrier based different Rhizobium inoculants on request to<br />

NARS partners.<br />

64


Output 2.1: Germplasm of staple crops assembled and conserved and germplasm characterized<br />

and documented for utilization and knowledge shared with partners<br />

Output target 2.1.3: Germplasm sets of staple crops evaluated for useful traits (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Evaluate germplasm sets of staple crops for agronomic characters and special traits for<br />

utilization<br />

Milestone: 2.1.3.1: Vegetable type pigeonpea germplasm evaluated for agronomic performance (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Identification of vegetable pigeonpea germplasm for resistance to wilt and SMD: In our quest to<br />

identify Fusarium wilt (FW) and sterility mosaic disease (SMD) in the vegetable type of pigeonpea<br />

germplasm, a set of 224 lines were sown in FW sick plot during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season at Patancheru. For<br />

SMD evaluation, each and every plant of the test entries were staple inoculated at three leaf stages<br />

with viruliferous europhid mites, reared separately on SMD infected plants. Susceptible controls to FW<br />

(ICP2376) and SMD (ICP 8863) were sown after every 10 test rows. Two lines (ICP 12772 and ICP<br />

12059) were found asymptomatic (0% incidence) to both the diseases while the respective susceptible<br />

control showed >90% incidence to FW and SMD.<br />

Mamta Sharma and Suresh Pande<br />

Milestone: 2.1.3.2: Sets of germplasm in staple crops evaluated to identify sources for yield and other<br />

quality traits ()<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Crop germplasm are necessary and fundamental to crop improvement programs. Continuous progress<br />

in plant breeding depends on discovery of new sources of genetic variation with beneficial traits and<br />

their judicious use in crop improvement programs. Sets of chickpea, groundnut, pigeonpea, pearl millet<br />

and sorghum germplasm were evaluated in RCBD designed trials with 2-3 replications using standard<br />

control cultivars to identify sources for yield and quality traits<br />

Chickpea<br />

Early maturity: Most breeding programs aim at developing early-maturing cultivars whose maturity<br />

period matches with the available cropping duration. Appropriate time to flowering is a major<br />

component of crop adaptation, particularly in the environments where the growing season is restricted<br />

by terminal drought and high temperature. Breeding for early maturing, high-yielding and<br />

agronomically broad-based cultivars require diverse sources of early maturity. When 16 germplasm<br />

lines were evaluated along with four controls (ICCV 2, ICCV 92944, ICCV 96029 and Annigeri) under<br />

irrigated, non-irrigated and late sown-irrigated environments, ICC 5597, ICC 5829, ICC 12426, ICC<br />

13839 and ICC 14368 (103-105 days to maturity; 2.45-2.82 t ha -1 seed yield) among desi and ICC<br />

14197 (103 days), high yielding (2.21 t ha -1 ) and large-seeded (45.5g 100 seed -1 ) line among kabulis<br />

were early maturing and produced higher seed yield than the best controls (Annigeri 104 days; 2.42 t<br />

65


ha -1 or ICCV2, 100 days, 1.89 t ha -1 , 25.3g 100 seeds<br />

-1<br />

) under irrigated environment. ICC 5597, ICC<br />

5829, ICC 11916, ICC 12426, ICC 12532, ICC 13839, ICC 14345, ICC 14368, ICC 14347 and ICC<br />

14348 (87-97 days to maturity; 1.35 – 1.57 t ha -1 ) among desi types and ICC 14197 (90 days; 1.46 tha -1 )<br />

among kabuli type were early maturing and produced higher seed yield under un-irrigated environment<br />

in comparison to control cultivar Annigeri (98 days; 1.32t ha -1 ) and ICCV 2 (92 days; 1.21 tha -1 ). ICC<br />

5597, ICC 5829, ICC 11916, ICC 12426, ICC 12532, ICC 13044, ICC 14346, ICC 14368, ICC 14347,<br />

ICC 14348, and ICC 14349 (65-78 days; 0.36 t ha -1 ) were early maturing and produced higher seed<br />

yield than Annigeri (78 days; 0.30 t ha -1 ) under late sown environment. ICC 5597, ICC 5829, ICC<br />

12426, and ICC 14368 matured early and produced higher seed yield than best control cultivar<br />

Annigeri over all the three environments.<br />

In another experiment 17 germplasm lines and three controls (KAK 2, ICCV 92944, and Annigeri)<br />

were evaluated under irrigated, non-irrigated and late sown-irrigated environments, none of the test<br />

entry produced higher seed yield than best control cultivar Annigeri under irrigated environment.<br />

However, ICC 13124, ICC 14284, ICC 14648, ICC 14649 and ICC 19641, (97-98 days; 1.50– 1.69 t<br />

ha -1 ) among desi types and ICC 17452 (98 days; 53.0g 100-seed weight; 1.38 t ha -1 ) among kabuli type<br />

were early maturing and produced significantly higher seed yield under un-irrigated environment in<br />

comparison to control cultivar Annigeri (98 days; 1.41t ha -1 ) and KAK 2 (97 days; 1.37 t ha -1 ). ICC<br />

6121, ICC 7410, ICC 13124, ICC 14293, ICC 14648, ICC 14653, ICC 19641, and ICC 19645 (73-74<br />

days; 0.52 – 0.74 t ha -1 ) among desi type and ICC 17452, ICC 17456, ICC 17459, and ICC 18591 (73-<br />

74 days; 0.25 – 0.36 t ha -1 ) among kabuli types were early maturing and produced higher seed yield<br />

than Annigeri (74 days; 0.51 t ha -1 ) and KAK 2 (74 days; 0.21 t ha -1 ) under late sown environment.<br />

ICC 13124, ICC 14648 and , ICC 19645, among desi types and ICC 17452 among kabuli types<br />

matured early and produced higher seed yield than best control cultivar Annigeri and KAK 2 under unirrigated<br />

and late sown environments.<br />

Large seed size in kabuli type: Seed size is an important trait in kabuli chickpea. Large seeded (100-<br />

seed weight >40g) kabuli chickpeas fetch higher market price as they are preferred by consumers. We<br />

evaluated 18 large seeded kabuli lines from newly assembled chickpea germplasm accessions from<br />

USA along with four control cultivars (ICCV 2, KAK 2, JGK 1 and L 550). ICC 19763 was early<br />

maturing, large-seeded and produced higher seed yield (107 days; 73.1g; 2.01 t ha -1 ) than the control<br />

cultivar KAK 2 (108 days; 40.9 g; 1.69 t ha -1 ) under irrigated environment. ICC 19449 was early<br />

maturing, large-seeded and produced similar seed yield (97 days; 55.4g; 1.03 t ha -1 ) to the control<br />

cultivar KAK 2 (101 days; 38.0 g; 1.09 t ha -1 ) under un-irrigated environment. A journal article on<br />

identification of large-seeded high yielding and stable kabuli chickpeas through evaluation of 65 large<br />

seeded kabuli lines in 18 trials and 13 environments was published (Crop Sci. 51: 198-209)<br />

Heat tolerance in chickpea: Global warming is inevitable under climate change scenario and<br />

identification of appropriate species/ varieties that could adapt to such change is imperative for<br />

sustaining crop productivity and ensuring food security. We evaluated 33 early maturing chickpea<br />

germplasm accessions for their tolerance to heat stress, the major factor in climate change, along with<br />

heat tolerant control cultivar ICCV 92944 in 9 trials comprising three environment (irrigated, rain-fed<br />

and late sown) and three seasons (2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10). Data for individual trial and<br />

environment and pooled across environments and seasons was analyzed. Plant traits such as plant<br />

width, flowering duration, days to maturity, pod number, seed weight, grain yield and per day<br />

productivity were affected under heat stress. Genotypes differed in their sensitivity to heat stress and<br />

the yield loss among genotypes varied from 10–20% of potential yield for every degree increase in<br />

temperature beyond the comfort zone (optimum temperature range). Mitigation of heat stress by<br />

application of additional nitrogen fertilizer to the crop resulted in sustaining the potential yield (unto<br />

85%). The accession ICC 14346 (BG 274, India) showed high tolerance to heat stress and could be<br />

used as a parent in crop improvement research. Though none of the accessions were significantly<br />

superior to the heat tolerant control ICCV 92944, a few accessions that showed consistent numerical<br />

superiority for yield and high response to management were identified. ICC 5597, ICC 12426, ICC<br />

14368, ICC 12670, ICC 13044, ICC 19645(all desi types with low SW), ICC 14653 and ICC 6121<br />

(both desi types high SW) and ICC 14197, ICC 18591, and ICC 14284 (kabuli types with high SW)<br />

were found promising for tolerance to heat stress, response to irrigation and additional nitrogen. A<br />

journal article has been submitted to Crop Science.<br />

66


Salinity tolerant chickpea: Salinity is an important constraint in agriculture worldwide, especially in<br />

South Asia (India, Pakistan) and Australia. Improved genotypes that are well adapted to saline<br />

conditions are needed to enhance and sustain production in these areas. We evaluated 13 previously<br />

identified salinity tolerant chickpea germplasm accessions and seven control cultivars under irrigated<br />

and non-irrigated environments for yield and yield attributing traits. A salinity tolerant accessions ICC<br />

11121, produced higher seed yield (2.43 t ha -1 ) compared to the best salinity tolerant control cultivar<br />

CSG 8962 (2.38 t ha -1 ) under irrigated environment. Similarly ICC 4593 and ICC 9942 produced<br />

higher seed yield (1.71-1.72 t ha -1 ) compared to CSG 8962 (1.68 t ha -1 ) under non-irrigated<br />

environment.<br />

Groundnut<br />

Confectionary groundnut: Groundnut is important food crop at the time when we are facing protein<br />

and energy malnutrition and shortage of pulses. Large seeded confectionery groundnuts have a great<br />

demand as snack food in market. Hence more emphasis is given to improve and exploit groundnut as a<br />

food crop to make farming more competitive and remunerative. Twenty-five large seeded accessions<br />

and five control cultivars (Gangapuri, ICGS 44, ICGS 76, M13 and Somnath) were evaluated during<br />

2009-10 post-rainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons at Patancheru. ICG 5662, ICG 9127, and ICG 12199 (60-<br />

82g 100-seed -1 ; 0.80-0.90 t ha -1 ) produced higher or similar pod yield than large seeded control<br />

cultivars Somnath (71g 100-seed -1 ; 0.83 t ha -1 ) during 2009-10 postrainy season. ICG 5690, ICG 8268,<br />

ICG 8345, ICG 9127 and ICG 12199 (1.06 – 1.32 t h -1 ; 45.0 – 51.0g 100-seed -1 ) produced higher pod<br />

yield than Somnath (1.06 t ha -1 ; 45.0g 100-seed -1 ) during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

Salinity tolerance in groundnut: Salinity affects plant growth, development and yield in<br />

approximately 100 M ha of arable land worldwide. Salinity adversely affects plant growth at all stages,<br />

seedling and reproductive stages in particular, drastically reduced the crop yield. The<br />

development/introduction of improved genotypes that are well adapted to saline conditions are needed<br />

to enhance and sustain production in salinity affected areas. We evaluated 11 previously identified<br />

salinity tolerant germplasm lines for pod yield and other agronomic traits with four control cultivars<br />

(Gangapuri, M 13, ICGS 44, ICGS 76) during 2009-10 postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons. ICG 6022<br />

(fastigiata) produced higher pod yield (1.21 t ha -1 ) with higher 100-seed weight (65g) than the control<br />

cultivar Gangapuri (0.92 t ha -1 , 44g 100-seed -1 ) during post-rainy season. ICG 11426 produced (3.53 t<br />

ha -1 ; 50.0g 100-seed -1 ) higher pod yield than all the control cultivars (1.36 – 1.95 t ha -1 ; 40.0-48.0g<br />

100-seed -1 ) during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

Drought tolerance in groundnut: Drought is one of the most important constraints for productivity,<br />

and there is a scope to avert large portion of these productivity losses through crop improvements. We<br />

evaluated previously identified 20 contrasting genotypes (10 low and 10 high root length/density) with<br />

four control cultivars (Gangapuri, M 13, ICGS 44, ICGS 76) for pod yield and other agronomic traits<br />

during 2009-10 postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons. ICGV 02286 and ICGV 94169 (1.28-1.34 t ha -1 )<br />

among the higher root length density(RLD) types produced higher pod yield with greater 100-seed<br />

weight (61-73g) in comparison to all the control cultivars (0.74-1.22 t ha -1 ; 42-60 g). Among the lower<br />

RLD types ICGV 01328 and ICGV 86011 (1.48-1.75 t ha -1 ) produced higher pod yield in comparison<br />

to all the control cultivars (0.74-1.22 t ha -1 ; 42-60 g) during 2009-10 postrainy season. ICG 14426,<br />

ICGV 02286 and ICGV 94169 (2.51-3.59 t ha -1 ) among the higher RLD types produced higher pod<br />

yield with greater 100-seed weight (37 – 51 g) in comparison to all the control cultivars (1.34-1.75 t ha -<br />

1 ; 29 - 45 g). Among the lower RLD types ICGV 92206 (1.87 t ha -1 ) produced higher pod yield during<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season Similarly evaluated 20 groundnut germplasm with high (10) and low (10) total dry<br />

mass and four control cultivars for agronomic traits during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. None of the lines<br />

produced higher pod yield than the control cultivars. We also evaluated 10 high and 10 low<br />

transpiration efficient groundnut germplasm with four control cultivars (Gangapuri, ICGS 44, ICGS 76<br />

and M 13) during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. ICG 13099 and ICG 14710 (1.54 – 1.58 t ha -1 ) produced higher<br />

pod yield than the control cultivars (1.37 – 1.48 t ha -1 )<br />

Bud necrosis disease (BND) and defoliation tolerant groundnut: Bud necrosis disease and<br />

defoliation are the major biotic stresses affecting the groundnut production drastically. We evaluated<br />

20 previously identified tolerant/resistant genotypes under natural field condition with four control<br />

cultivars (Gangapuri, M 13, ICGS 44, ICGS 76) for pod yield and other agronomic traits during 2009-10<br />

67


postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons. ICGV 01276 and ICGV 86011 (1.45-1.83 t ha -1 ) produced higher<br />

pod yield than all the control cultivars (0.85-1.40 t ha -1 ) during postrainy season. ICGV 01276 and<br />

ICGV 86011 (2.28 – 4.27 t ha -1 ) produced higher pod yield than all the control cultivars (1.23 – 2.28 t<br />

ha -1 ) during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

Evaluation of groundnut germplasm for agronomic traits: 264 germplasm lines and four control<br />

cultivars (Gangapuri, M 13, ICGS 44 and ICGS 76) as part of reference set were evaluated in alpha<br />

design during 2009-10 postrainy season. ICGs 5236, 12991, 15419, 11088 and ICGVs 87354, 91116,<br />

97183, 87921, 88145, 01276, 01328, and ICGV 02446 (1.37 – 1.88 t ha -1 ) produced greater pod yield<br />

than all the controls (0.69 – 1.36 t ha -1 ).<br />

Pearl millet<br />

During <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 360 accessions of fodder type, 238 accessions of mini core collection, 335<br />

accessions of P. violaceum and 48 accessions of P. mollissimum were planted in different trials for<br />

evaluation. Accessions were grown in a single row of 4-m length in alpha-design with two replications.<br />

Fodder type pearl millet: A total of 360 accessions were evaluated for fodder traits, such as high<br />

tillering, high plant height and high scoring for green fodder yield potential. IP 3616 and IP 22269<br />

(both fodder types) and IP 17862 (grain type) were used as controls. Accessions selected were highly<br />

diverse for days to 50% flowering ranging from 41 to 128 days. Plant height varied from 142.9 cm to<br />

440.7 cm, total tillers from 1 to 18 tillers, leaf length from 60 to 78 cm, leaf width from 24 to 44 mm<br />

and number of leaves from 9 to 20. None of the accessions flowered earlier than the best control IP<br />

17862, which is a grain type and flowered in 45 days. Fourteen accessions for stem thickness, 9<br />

accessions for leaf width, four accessions (IPs 6140, 11593, 17189 and 17287) for number of leaves per<br />

plant, 61 accessions for plant height, 46 accessions for total tillers per plant, 28 accessions for<br />

productive tillers per plant, 35 accessions for panicle length and 3 accessions (IPs 6494, 11673 and<br />

17342) for panicle thickness, showed significantly better performance than the best control.<br />

Mini core collection: For enhanced utilization of germplasm in crop improvement, the researchers at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> genebank developed pearl millet core collection consisting 2094 accessions representing the<br />

entire collection for diversity (Upadhyaya et al. 2008). The size of core collection was large and<br />

unwieldy for management. Therefore for effective management and evaluation, a mini core collection<br />

consisting 238 accessions (10% of core collection or 1% of entire collection; Crop Science 51:217-223)<br />

and representing the diversity of entire collection (20,766 cultivated germplasm accessions) was<br />

developed. During <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, mini core collection (238 accessions) was evaluated for<br />

important agronomic traits. Seven accessions (IPs 4291, 7846, 9492, 9527, 11546, 12418 and 17532)<br />

for flowering, 40 accessions for plant height, six accessions (IPs 3626, 4291, 7497, 7846, 7886, 18040)<br />

for total tillers per plant, 4 accessions (IPs 3626, 4291, 7497 and 7886) for productive tillers, 42<br />

accessions for panicle length and 31 accessions for panicle thickness, performed better than the best<br />

control. Evaluation data of wild species is being computerized.<br />

Heat tolerance in Pearl millet: To promote pearl millet adaptation in the face of changes in climate,<br />

substantial efforts are needed to identify trait-specific germplasm adapted to abiotic stresses<br />

particularly high temperature. Adverse effect of high temperature has been reported in cereal crops as<br />

shortening of the developmental phases resulting in reduced productivity. Pearl millet mini core<br />

collection was evaluated under stress (high temperature) and non-stress (normal) conditions for<br />

agronomic traits during rainy (June/July planting; temperature 22-31°C) and summer season<br />

(Feb/March planting; temperature 35-43°C) at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru and during rainy (40- 42° C) and<br />

summer season (42-52°C) at Jodhpur /Sanchore, Rajasthan, India (coinciding high temperature at<br />

reproductive stage). Data on important agronomic traits such as days to 50% flowering, days to<br />

maturity, plant height, number of total and productive tillers, panicle exsertion, panicle length, panicle<br />

thickness, panicle compactness, 1000-seed weight, seed color, seed yield potential and fodder yield<br />

potential were recorded and the difference in trait values recorded between normal and high<br />

temperature seasons were taken as a measure of heat tolerance. Mean performance of accessions over<br />

locations under stress conditions indicated significantly higher performance of 5 accessions (IP 5185,<br />

IP 5711, IP 5719, IP 8472 and IP 20715) for plant height, 12 accessions for panicle length and one<br />

accessions (IP 5581) for stover yield. Overall mean of accessions under stress conditions indicated<br />

early flowering (64.5 days) relatively short height (185 cm) and low stover and seed yield when<br />

compared to performance under normal conditions. 10 accessions (IPs 1566, 3525, 5389, 6798, 8350,<br />

10953, 16402, 16489, 17775 and 19305) for flowering, one accession (IP 13387) for plant height and<br />

68


three accessions (IP 9617, IP 18545 and IP 19305) for stover yield did not show any effect of stress<br />

conditions and performed similarly under both conditions. Flowering was delayed by 1-16 days in 122<br />

accessions under stress conditions. Maximum delay for flowering was in IP 7846, which flowered in 39<br />

days under normal conditions and 55 days under stress conditions. On the other hand, 106 accessions<br />

flowered early under stress conditions. In 168 accessions including one control (IP 3616), plant height<br />

was affected and decreased under stress conditions. Maximum reduction in plant height was observed<br />

in IP 14599 (129.6 cm). The selected heat tolerant accessions will be further studied to understand the<br />

physiological basis of heat tolerance by physiologists. The heat tolerant pearl millet germplasm will be<br />

made available to researchers worldwide under the Standard Material Transfer Agreement (SMTA) of<br />

the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA) for further<br />

testing and utilization in breeding and genomics applications including mapping and cloning of<br />

genes/QTL associated with heat tolerance.<br />

Sorghum<br />

Evaluated 242 accessions of sorghum mini core collection accessions, 103 new germplasm accessions<br />

received from Griffin, USA and 574 data missing accessions for important morpho-agronomic<br />

characters like days to 50% flowering, plant height (cm), panicle exsertion (cm), panicle length (cm),<br />

panicle width (cm), and on sucrose content during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. We also characterized 100<br />

accessions of wild sorghums during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The plant stand was good, and data were<br />

recorded for important morpho-agronomic characters. These characters are days to 50 % flowering,<br />

culm height, plants rooting at culm nodes, culm branching above, culm hairiness, culm pigmentation,<br />

waxy bloom, nodal hairiness, nodal hair type, nodal pigmentation, leaf sheath clasping, leaf shape, leaf<br />

color, midrib color, leaf blade (abaxial), leaf blade (adaxial), leaf margin hairiness, leaf sheath<br />

hairiness, ligule form, leaf length (5 th leaf) cm, leaf width (5 th leaf) cm, panicle exsertion (cm), panicle<br />

length (cm), panicle width (cm), rachis node number, plants whether rhizomatous or not, basal tillers<br />

number, panicle shape, rachis continuity, number of branches at each node, spikelet pairing and raceme<br />

length. Post harvest data analysis is progress.<br />

Characterized 12 wild sorghum germplasm accessions of S. aethiopicuum (2), S. verticilliflorum (4), S.<br />

Virgatum (4), and S. arundinaceum (2) for rhizoplane soils in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Data analysis is in progress<br />

The use of these new sources of variation in plant breeding would have a great impact in developing<br />

new and improved high yielding broad based cultivars for cultivation under diversified cropping<br />

systems and varied environmental conditions<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

Milestone: 2.1.3.3: New/assembled germplasm characterized/evaluated for important traits to fill gaps<br />

in characterization data (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Characterization and evaluation of germplasm are the crucial component of genebank activities and are<br />

required to enhance the use of germplasm in crop improvement and molecular biology. We identified<br />

characterization gaps in the databases of chickpea, groundnut, pigeonpea, pearl millet and sorghum.<br />

These accessions were characterized along with the newly assembled germplasm. Characterization data<br />

was recorded and databases updated.<br />

Chickpea: Characterized 1048 chickpea accessions to fill the gaps in characterization database for<br />

days to 50% flowering, days to flower ending, flower color, plant color, flowering duration, growth<br />

habit, and days to maturity during 2008-09 postrainy season.<br />

69


Groundnut: Characterized 453 groundnut accessions during 2008-09 postrainy and 200 accessions<br />

during 2009 rainy season to fill the gaps in characterization database for 31 agro-morphological traits<br />

Pigeonpea During 2008-09, a total of 670 accessions of pigeonpea were characterized to fill the gaps<br />

for various traits in characterization database. The gaps were mostly for leaf size. In continuation of our<br />

efforts to fill the gaps in characterization database, we have planted another set of 804 accessions in<br />

2009-<strong>2010</strong> rainy season in vertisols for recording observations on various characters. Recording of<br />

observations is in progress.<br />

Pearl millet: Registered, characterized, and documented 617 pearl millet germplasm accessions<br />

identified as unique in genebank at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Niamey, Niger, for 23 morpho-agronomic traits. Data<br />

revealed considerable diversity for almost all traits in the newly acquired pearl millet collection. Days<br />

to 50% flowering in the newly acquired pearl millet collection ranged from 56 to 113 days, plant height<br />

varied from 205 to 445 cm. Total tillers varied from 1 to 5 and productive tillers from 1 to 3, panicle<br />

length from 14 to 120 cm, panicle thickness from 12 to 40 mm and panicle density score from 4 to 8.<br />

Sorghum: 482 newly assembled sorghum germplasm accessions from Niger were characterized and<br />

classified for important morpho-agronomic characters. These include races bicolor (59 accessions),<br />

guinea (40 accessions), caudatum (43 accessions) and durra (24 accessions), and intermediate races<br />

guinea-caudatum (78 accessions), caudatum-bicolor (130 accessions), durra-bicolor (8 accessions),<br />

kafir-caudatum (2 accessions) and durra-caudatum (98 accessions).<br />

The updated characterization databases will facilitate the scientists to select the germplasm lines for use<br />

in crop improvement<br />

HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone: 2.1.3.4: New germplasm sources identified for target insect pests and diseases in different<br />

crops (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Identification of new germplasm source for resistance to ascochyta blight, botrytis gray mold,<br />

fusarium wilt, dry root rot and collar rot in chickpea: To identify resistance to Ascochyta blight<br />

(AB), Botrytis gray mold (BGM), Fusarium wilt (FW), collar rot (CR) and dry root rot (DRR) diseases<br />

of chickpea, 250 new germplasm accessions were evaluated following green house/controlled<br />

environment conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru. Standardized resistance screening techniques based<br />

on sound epidemiological principles were followed to evaluate these accessions for individual diseases.<br />

Severities of AB, BGM and DRR were scored on 1-9 rating scale and the incidence of FW and CR was<br />

recorded as percentage of mortality. Results are as follows:<br />

Resistance to AB: Twenty one lines were found moderately resistant (3.1-5.0 rating, based on 1-9<br />

scale) to AB.<br />

Resistance to BGM: Ninety three lines were found moderately resistant (3.1-5.0 rating, based on 1-9<br />

scale) to BGM.<br />

Resistance to DRR: Two lines were found moderately resistant (3.1-5.0 rating, based on 1-9 scale) to<br />

DRR.<br />

Resistance to CR: Two lines were found moderately resistant (10.1-20% incidence) to collar rot.<br />

Resistance to FW: Thirty lines were asymptomatic (0% incidence) and four lines moderately resistant<br />

(10.1-20% incidence) to FW.<br />

The susceptible controls for FW and CR (JG62) showed 100% incidence, while controls for AB (PB7),<br />

BGM (JG 62), and DRR (BG 212) were rated 8-9 on 1-9 severity rating scale, where 1= resistant and<br />

9=highly susceptible<br />

Suresh Pande, Mamta Sharma, HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

70


Evaluation of chickpea reference set for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

80%<br />

The reference collection is being evaluated for third seasons<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Indian Institute of Pulses Research - India; Institute of Agricultural Research - Ethiopia; Kenya<br />

Agricultural Research Institute - Kenya<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Evaluation of chickpea reference set for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. The<br />

reference set (300 lines), along with the resistant (ICC 506), and the susceptible (L 550) controls was<br />

evaluated for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera during the 2008/09 postrainy season at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, India. There were three replications in a randomized complete block design. The<br />

test material was sown on ridges, 60 cm apart. There were two rows for each plot, 2 m long. The plants<br />

were thinned to a spacing of 10 cm between the plants at 15 days after seedling emergence. Normal<br />

agronomic practices were followed for raising the crop, but there was no insecticides application in the<br />

experimental plots. Data were recorded on leaf and pod damage, egg and larval density per 10 plants,<br />

overall resistance score, and grain yield. The material was also evaluated for resistance to H. armigera<br />

using detached leaf assay at the vegetative (30 days after seedling emergence) stage. For this purpose,<br />

the terminal branches (5 – 7 cm long, with five fully expanded leaves) were infested with 10 neonate<br />

larvae in a 250 ml plastic cup in the laboratory. Data were recorded on leaf feeding on a 1 – 9 scale (1<br />

= 80% leaf area damaged), larval weight, and larval survival at 5 days after infestation.<br />

In detached leaf assay at the vegetative stage (30 days after seedling emergence), leaf feeding scores<br />

ranged from 1.67 – 7.98 (mean 3.98), and compared to 3.67 on ICC 506 and ICC 3137. Larval weights<br />

ranged from 0.58 – 5.65 mg (mean 2.80 mg) compared to 1.91 mg on ICC 506, and 2.94 mg on ICC<br />

3137. Many lines suffered low feeding damage and also had lower larval weight gains comparable to<br />

the resistant control, ICC 506, and further screening of these lines may result in identification of<br />

genotypes with antifeedant and/or antibiosis mechanism of resistance to H. armigera.<br />

Under natural infestation in the field, leaf feeding scores varied from 3.5 – 7.5 in the reference set, 5.5<br />

in ICCV 10, and 5.0 in ICC 3137 during the vegetative phase. There were 0.0 – 9.0 larvae per 5 plants<br />

in the reference set, 4.0 in ICCV 10, and 5.5 in ICC 3137. During the reproductive stage, there were 0.0<br />

– 17.0 larvae per 5 plants in the reference set, 3.5 in ICCV 10, and 6.0 larvae in ICC 3137. Overall<br />

resistance scores ranged from 3.0 – 8.0 (mean 6.25), 3.5 in ICCV 10 and 7.0 in ICC 3137. Pod damage<br />

ranged from 3.5 - 86.9% in the reference set, 12.9% in ICCV 10 and 24% in ICC 3137. The grain yield<br />

of the test lines ranged from 100 – 2,530 kg ha -1 , The genotypes showing lower susceptibility to<br />

damage by H. armigera and a yield potential of >1,000 kg ha -1 under unprotected conditions will be<br />

distributed to NARS partners for use in breeding programs or for on-farm testing for use by the<br />

farmers. The genotypes ICC 1230, ICC 2263, ICC 3325, ICC 4567, ICC 5135, ICC 6874, ICC 10466,<br />

ICC 11198, ICC 12307, ICC 14831, ICC 15406, ICC 15606, and ICC 16524 suffered low H. armigera<br />

damage and plant mortality due to seedling diseases, and also exhibited high yield potential under<br />

unprotected conditions. The results indicated that there is considerable variation in the reference set for<br />

resistance/susceptibility to H. armigera, and selections based on detached leaf assay, and field<br />

performance of the lines can be used for developing breeding populations with resistance to pod borer.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes 1- Gates Foundation<br />

HC Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

71


Output target 2.1.4: Germplasm accessions regenerated for conservation and distribution (2011)<br />

Activity: Regenerate critical accessions of staple crops germplasm<br />

MTP 2011 2.1.1<br />

Milestone 2.1.4.1: Germplasm of staple crops regenerated (2000 accessions) for conservation and<br />

distribution (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Germplasm regeneration is an important component of genebank management. Chickpea, groundnut,<br />

pigeonpea, pearl millet and sorghum germplasm lines with low seed stock and poor viability (


Germplasm of staple crops assembled and conserved for utilization at regional genebanks in<br />

Africa (Bulawayo, Nairobi and Niamey)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

80%<br />

Stringent germplasm exchange requirements from Ethiopia made it difficult to get germplasm from there.<br />

Countries involved:<br />

Uganda, Tanzania, Kenya and Ethiopia<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

KARI-Kenya, NARO-Uganda, DRD-Tanzania, EIAR/ARARI-Ethiopia.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> in collaboration with Tanzanian and Ugandan NARs, conducted collection missions in June-<br />

July <strong>2010</strong> to fill gaps. In Tanzania collection targeted the southern part of the country: (Sumbawanga,<br />

Nkasi and Mbozi districts); a major millet growing area, but where little is known on its production.<br />

Ugandan collection targeted all major growing areas (Soroti, Kumi, Serere, Apac, Lira, Hoima and<br />

Masindi districts). A total of 81 and 105 samples were collected from Tanzania and Uganda,<br />

respectively and being characterized in Kiboko. Germplasm is yet to be got from Ethiopia.<br />

Special project funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Mary Mgonja, Henry Ojulong<br />

E Manyasa P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Milestone: 2.1.4.2: Germplasm accessions of staple crops germplasm with low seed stock/viability<br />

regenerated (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Germplasm regeneration is an important component of genebank management. Chickpea, groundnut,<br />

pigeonpea, pearl millet and sorghum germplasm lines with low seed stock and poor viability (


• Season – Since groundnut is day-neutral and seeds can be regenerated both during rainy and<br />

post-rainy seasons. A minimum of two plantings in each ring was achieved in one year. Pod<br />

returns are assured irrespective of the season and local weather conditions.<br />

• Operations – With minimal monitoring and care during the regeneration cycle the efficiency<br />

gains were larger.<br />

• Pod/seed yields – All the wild species have potential for higher pod yield as observed from the<br />

data. Extending the harvesting period till pod set and maturity in each accession and confining<br />

pod set within the ring facilitated achieving the desirable yields. Harvesting all the developed<br />

pods was possible in rings while these were not possible under field conditions.<br />

• Genetic integrity – The main objective of establishing the facility is to maintain genetic<br />

integrity of the wild species accessions during regeneration by restricting plant growth and<br />

pod set to one ring thereby avoiding admixtures from other accessions. This was a big<br />

constraint under field regeneration.<br />

Updated seed stock of staple crops germplasm with low and poor viability with healthy pure and viable<br />

seed to meet the seed request.<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

Milestone: 2.1.4.3: Seed viability and health of new and regenerated germplasm tested and viability of<br />

conserved germplasm monitored ()<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Provide healthy, pure and viable seed is an important genebank activity. We monitored the seed<br />

viability and health of chickpea, groundnut, pigeonpea, pearl millet and sorghum germplasm which<br />

were regenerated to update the seed stocks in base and active collections and to maintain a safety<br />

backup.<br />

Seed viability: The seed viability of 8,952 accessions was tested during this period. This included<br />

4,290 samples of germplasm for medium-term storage and safety back up at Svalbard (sorghum-770,<br />

chickpea – 3,063 and pigeonpea – 457); 2,182 for medium-term storage (Sorghum- 1,496 and pearl<br />

millet – 686); 1,066 accessions of working collections (sorghum – 720 groundnut – 188 and pigeonpea<br />

– 158); and monitoring viability on 1,414 accessions of sorghum base collection.<br />

Seed health testing: Seed health test of new and regenerated germplasm is a regular activity of Plant<br />

Quarantine Laboratory (PQL) in collaboration with genebank. During <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 1029 germplasm<br />

accessions (pigeonpea-576 and sorghum-453) regenerated from medium term storage of the genebank<br />

were evaluated for their seed health status using the standard blotter method. Four hundred and ninety<br />

accessions were completely free from pathogens. In the remaining accessions, we detected 17 fungi in<br />

pigeonpea and 18 in sorghum. Among the major seed borne fungi detected were species of<br />

Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Fusarium in pigeonpea, Alternaria, Fusarium and Curvularia in sorghum.<br />

The accessions found unfit for storage and distribution varied from 6 to 16% across two crops as the<br />

germination was below 80% and fungal infection from 4 to 92%.<br />

Updated the seed stocks of staple crops germplasm with low and poor viability in base and active<br />

collections with healthy, pure and viable seeds to meet the seed request.<br />

RP Thakur, R Sharma, HD Upadhyaya and NBPGR<br />

Milestone: 2.1.4.4: Germplasm samples processed for medium- and long-term conservation (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

74


Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Regeneration and conservation are important activities of genebank management. Regenerated<br />

germplasm of staple crops were processed for moisture content, genetic and physical purity and<br />

viability test and the accessions which met the required standard for all the test were transferred to<br />

medium- and long-term collections<br />

Seed harvests of 389 critical accessions of chickpea (93) and groundnut (296) regenerated in the special<br />

facilities during 2009 were transferred to the medium term storage on priority basis. Additionally, seed<br />

samples of 6,366 accessions regenerated during the rainy and post-rainy seasons were transferred to the<br />

medium-term cold rooms following standard protocols. These include sorghum (2,160), pearl millet<br />

(686), chickpea (3,063) and pigeonpea (457). Seed yield from 2009 post-rainy season was poor in<br />

majority of accessions because of stem rot/white mold infection on the standing crop and harvested<br />

seeds were processed for <strong>2010</strong> post-rainy season plantings. A total of 1,443 accessions were processed<br />

for long-term storage (chickpea – 935; pigeonpea – 54; and sorghum – 454) bringing the total base<br />

collection to 108,558 accessions covering 90.7% of the entire collection.<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

Activity: Establish safety back up collections of staple crops<br />

Milestone: 2.1.4.5: Facilities identified for backup safety storage of germplasm collections in<br />

collaboration with partners and samples processed for safety backup (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

As part of the agreement between <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and the Nordic Genetic Resources Center, Norway), we<br />

deposited the germplasm of staple crops to Svalbard Global Seed Vault, Norway for safety back up.<br />

Identified germplasm accessions of staple crops for safety back up. These accessions were regenerated<br />

and processed for safety back up. We have deposited 22,000 seed samples of in-trust staple crops<br />

germplasm at the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, Norway following standard protocols of seed health<br />

testing and certification by National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) in India. An<br />

additional 900 accessions from this set were also sent for germination monitoring in due course of time.<br />

The passport and characterization data on these accessions was successfully uploaded to the public data<br />

portal at www.nordgen.org/sgsv. With these depositions the total number of duplicate samples of<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> germplasm of staple crops at the seed vault increased to 58,600 representing sorghum<br />

(21,000), pearl millet (13,580), chickpea (10,005), pigeonpea (8,000) and groundnut (6,015). Thus,<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> is fulfilling the role of the great initiative for saving global agricultural biodiversity for future<br />

generations.<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

MTP 2009 2.1.2<br />

Milestone 2.1.5.1: Staple crops germplasm databases updated and uploaded to SINGER database<br />

(2009)<br />

Progress reported in 2009:<br />

75%<br />

75


Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Under agreement between <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and Svalbard Global Seed Vault the databases of chickpea,<br />

groundnut, pigeonpea, pearl millet and sorghum were updated and uploaded to the SINGER format and<br />

Svalbard Global Seed Vault<br />

The passport information on 109,378 accessions of staple crops and their distribution data (outside the<br />

institution) have been uploaded to SINGER following standard protocols. The distribution data<br />

includes 664,541 samples of 91,047 accessions represented by sorghum (32,200), pearl millet (17,252),<br />

chickpea (16,507), pigeonpea (10,664) and groundnut (14,424). Passport and conservation data of<br />

58,600 accessions, deposited at Svalbard Global Seed Vault was uploaded to www.nordgen.Org/sgsv.<br />

The Other documentation activities included the following the design and validation of web based<br />

Chickpea Crop Registry, design and updating the genebank website and improvement of georeferences<br />

data quality<br />

Passport and characterization data of 58,600 accessions, deposited at Svalbard Global Seed Vault was<br />

uploaded to www.nordgen.Org/sgsv. Similarly information on 109,378 accessions of staple crops has<br />

been updated to SINGER server.<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

MTP <strong>2010</strong> 2.1.2<br />

Output target 2.1.6: 85% of germplasm characterized and documented for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Characterize and document staple crops germplasm assembled<br />

Milestone 2.1.6.1: Germplasm accessions of staple crops characterized for morpho-agronomic traits<br />

and documented for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Characterization and documentation are the integral component of genebank management to enhance<br />

the use of genetic diversity conserved in genebanks in crop improvement programs and genomics. We<br />

identified the gaps in characterization databases of staple crops, characterized those accessions and<br />

updated the databases<br />

Characterized 248 chickpea accessions for updating plant pigmentation and 405 accessions for<br />

updating flowering duration, 315 groundnut accessions for updating 19 traits, 335 accessions of P.<br />

violaceum, and 48 accessions of P. mollissimum in pearl millet and 804 accessions of pigeonpea, 103<br />

accessions of sorghum and gaps in databases updated. Additionally we grew 517 of pearl millet, 910<br />

accessions of pigeonpea, 110 accessions of chickpea, and 650 accessions of groundnut during <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

season for gaps in databases. With these updates, our databases contain characterization and evaluation<br />

data on 97% of total accessions conserved in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> genebank.<br />

76<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda


Germplasm characterized and documented for utilization at regional genebanks in Africa<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

80%<br />

as data and materials are still under processing<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Southern Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

MOA-Sudan, KARI-Kenya, NARO-Uganda, DRD-Tanzania<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

45 sorghum accessions collected from Southern Sudan were characterized at Kiboko (Kenya) and Torit<br />

(S. Sudan) in <strong>2010</strong>. The data is still being processed.<br />

Special project funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Mary Mgonja, Henry Ojulong,<br />

E Manyasa P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

MTP <strong>2010</strong> 2.1.1<br />

Output target 2.1.7: Germplasm of staple crops assembled and conserved for utilization at<br />

regional genebanks in Africa (Bulawayo, Nairobi and Niamey) (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Identify sorghum collection gaps, collect and conserve new germplasm from identified<br />

priority areas in the eastern and southern Africa (ESA)<br />

Milestone: Gap analysis for pearl millet collection published (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India and Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru and Niamey<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Critical assessment of existing collections, identifying geographical and diversity gaps and launching<br />

germplasm collection missions in unexplored and under-explored areas is important to increase the<br />

variability and achieve near completion of the collection to support crop improvement program and<br />

combat the effect of climate change on crop productivity. The <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Genebank in India holds the<br />

world’s largest collection of 21,594 pearl millet germplasm accessions from 50 countries including<br />

6,529 landraces from 10 Asian countries. Gaps in the pearl millet collection database were analysed<br />

using GIS tools.<br />

Gap analysis revealed 134 distinct districts of 14 provinces in India and 12 districts of Punjab province<br />

in Pakistan as the major geographical gaps. In India, Chittoor, Karimnagar, Nizamabad, Prakasham and<br />

Warangal in Andhra Pradesh; Raigarh in Chattisgarh; Dewas and Rewa in Madhya Pradesh; Buldana<br />

and Hingoli in Maharashtra; Malkangiri, Nabarangapur, Naupada, and Sundergarh in Orissa; Bhilwara,<br />

Chittaurgarh and Kota in Rajasthan; Thiruvallur and Vellore in Tamil Nadu and Auraiya, Chandauli,<br />

Chitrakoot, Gonda, Gorakhpur, Hamirpur, Kushinagar, Mau, Shrawasti and Sonbhadra in Uttar Pradesh<br />

were found as common geographical gaps by both methods; agricultural statistics for India predicted<br />

probability of pearl millet occurrence, used in this study. A total of 208 distinct districts of 12<br />

provinces were identified as gaps in diversity for one or more traits. Among all districts, Beed, Latur<br />

and Osmanabad in Maharashtra, India; Rajanpur, Mujaffargarh, Multan and Lodhran for panicle length<br />

and Chakwal and Sargodha in Pakistan and southern parts of North Yemen and Lahiz provinces in<br />

Yemen were identified as gaps in the diversity. In India, Warangal in Andhra Pradesh; Rewa in<br />

77


Madhya Pradesh; Hingoli in Maharashtra; Vellore in Tamil Nadu; Auraiya, Chandauli, Chitrakut,<br />

Gorakhpur and Mau in Uttar Pradesh were identified as gaps in diversity for one or more traits and<br />

found common to geographical gaps identified. In Pakistan, Lodhran, Multan and Muzaffargarh were<br />

identified as gaps common to probability and diversity methods.<br />

Area for exploration should be decided prior to launch of the collection mission in consultation with<br />

local government officials and extension officers, who are known to have knowledge of pearl millet<br />

cultivation in the identified districts. It is suggested to collect the complete passport data including georeference<br />

information while collecting the germplasm. A journal article was published in Plant Genetic<br />

Resources 8:267-276.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone: African accessions of GCP pearl millet reference collection characterized in West Africa<br />

(2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Nigeria, Niger, Mali<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

LCRI, IER, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

This Trust-funded project has been successfully completed with a final report which was appreciated<br />

by the donor; the respective manuscript preparation is in final stages (abstract copied below); data have<br />

been shared with the Trust and with Trushar Shah (<strong>ICRISAT</strong> database manager) for inclusion in a data<br />

base.<br />

Abstract. To promote utilization of West and Central African (WCA) genetic resources of pearl millet<br />

[Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], and to enhance linkages between the Generation Challenge Program<br />

(GCP) and WCA pearl millet breeding programs, the present project aimed at agro-morphological<br />

characterization of selected accessions from the GCP pearl millet reference collection. A total of 81<br />

accessions from the collection were successfully multiplied via manual “sibbing” at Sadore (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-<br />

Niger) during the off-seasons 2008/2009 and February 2009. The 81 accessions comprised 78<br />

cultivated landraces and three improved cultivars. The 78 landraces originated from 13 countries,<br />

namely Benin (1 accession), Burkina Faso (8), Cameroon (6), Central Africa (1), Ghana (4), Mali (9),<br />

Mauritania (1), Niger (15), Nigeria (14), Senegal (1), South Africa (3), Sudan (10), and Togo (5). The<br />

three improved cultivars originated from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger (2) and from a joint <strong>ICRISAT</strong> / “Institut<br />

d’Economie Rurale” (IER, Mali) breeding program (1). In cooperation with Lake Chad Research<br />

Institute (LCRI, Nigeria) and IER, 74 of the 81 accessions (depending on available seed quantity) were<br />

characterized together with 7 controls in the rainy season 2009 in field trials under low- and high-input<br />

conditions at Sadore (Niger), Maiduguri (Nigeria) and Cinzana (Mali). All 81 accessions were<br />

evaluated together with 18 controls for resistance to the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Del.)<br />

Benth. in an artificially infested field at Sadore (Niger). The tested accessions revealed a wide range of<br />

genetic diversity for various traits. Several accessions were identified as sources for specific traits of<br />

interest, such as presence of long awns, compact panicles with high grain density; specific grain color;<br />

earliness, lower susceptibility to Striga, and wide adaptation across the various test environments.<br />

These accessions are currently being integrated in <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s and partner NARS’ breeding programs.<br />

The project therefore successfully contributed to use of genetic resources and diversification of pearl<br />

millet breeding programs in Niger, Mali and Nigeria. Seed of all accessions and characterization data<br />

are available with <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Global Crop Diversity Trust<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

78


Activity: Conserve safety copy of germplasm held at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru at Sadore, Niger<br />

Milestone 2.1.7.2: Safety copy of germplasm conserved at Niamey genebank (groundnut, finger millet<br />

and pearl millet) (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The safety duplicates of a total of 11,791 accessions (5,205 pearl millet, 4,580 finger millet and 2,006<br />

groundnut accessions) were conserved in deep freezers at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niamey at -20°C. We have<br />

encountered few problems of power cuts for short periods which may not influence the viability of well<br />

dried seeds and samples packed in good quality laminated aluminum pouches for storage at sub-zero<br />

temperatures. However, we are adopting suitable precautionary measures to avoid such power<br />

interruptions in future.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

No<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Activity: Safely conserve assembled germplasm for utilization<br />

Milestone: 2.1.7.4: Germination tested for groundnut, sorghum and millet germplasm accessions at<br />

Sadore, Niger (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The Sadore genebank team (Hassane Bissala, Sani Awel) tested 5540 groundnut accessions for<br />

germination percentage to identify critical accessions. These tested 5540 accessions covered all FAO<br />

in-trust groundnut accessions (with ICG number) stored in the active collection.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

No<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Milestone: 2.1.7.5: Critical accessions of groundnut, sorghum and millet regenerated in glasshouses at<br />

Sadore, Niger (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

INRAN-Niger<br />

79


Progress/Results:<br />

A total of 566 critical groundnut accessions and 130 sorghum accessions with low seed quantities were<br />

regenerated in <strong>2010</strong>. Groundnut regeneration took place at the INRAN Station at Bengou, financed by<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> core funds. After shelling, more than 300g of seeds was obtained for each 536 groundnut<br />

accessions. The sorghum accessions were regenerated at Sadore and simultaneously characterized for<br />

up to 20 traits, to augment the characterization data base. Processing of harvest observation and data<br />

analyses are still underway.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

No special project funding.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Milestone: 2.1.7.6: Germplasm accessions of groundnut, sorghum and pearl millet regenerated in the<br />

field at Sadore, Niger (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

INRAN-Niger<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

<strong>Report</strong>ed under milestone 2.1.7.5<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Output target 2.1.8: Unrestricted access and movement for staple crops germplasm ensured<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Assure risk-free export and import of germplasm materials<br />

Milestone 2.1.8.1: Requested germplasm of staple crops distributed to bona fide users for utilization<br />

(Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Twenty six countries – Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, Germany, Ghana,<br />

India, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Malawi, Mali, Nepal, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Senegal, South Africa,<br />

Swaziland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom and USA<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, NARS in 26 countries<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Unrestricted movement of germplasm is required to utilize the variation available in vast pool of plant<br />

genetic resources. Pure, healthy and viable seeds of staple crops were supplied on request following<br />

standard germplasm distribution protocols.<br />

The Patancheru genebank distributed 3,268 germplasm samples in 88 consignments for research use in<br />

26 countries following standard germplasm distribution protocols. This included sorghum (1,423),<br />

pearl millet (360), chickpea (783), pigeonpea (319) and groundnut (383). Part of this distribution<br />

includes eight sets of mini core collection (sorghum – 4, chickpea -3 and pigeonpea – 1). The user<br />

community includes CGIAR centre (25), NARS (1,413), University (1,455), commercial company<br />

(370) and farmer/individual (5).<br />

80


Additionally, 2,888 germplasm samples representing sorghum (2,038), pearl millet (531), chickpea<br />

(89), pigeonpea (186) and groundnut (44) were supplied to scientists within the institute. The supply<br />

included one reference set of sorghum and two sets of pearl millet mini core collection. We supplied a<br />

total of 6156 seed samples to the researchers in 26 countries and within <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

RP Thakur, HD Upadhyaya, CLL Gowda and NBPGR<br />

Milestone 2.1.8.2: Requested germplasm of staple crops exported for utilization and new germplasm<br />

imported for conservation after seed health evaluation and clearance through NBPGR (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Export. PQL facilitated export of 19263 seed/grain samples of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s mandate crops to 46<br />

countries during <strong>2010</strong>. Among exported samples, 16034 seed samples (sorghum-2456, pearl millet-<br />

7613, chickpea- 4592, pigeonpea- 304, groundnut-947 and small millets-122) were processed for<br />

phytosanitary measures through NBPGR Hyderabad and exported along with 136 phytosanitary<br />

certificates. Additional 3229 samples (Pearl millet 3185 grain samples for chemical analysis to<br />

Australia and chickpea 44 seed samples to USA for research) were sent without phytosanitary<br />

certificate after following importing country’s regulations. A total of 135 (0.8% of the total processed<br />

for phytosanitary certificates) seed samples (sorghum-30, pearl millet-27, Chickpea-61, pigeonpea-10<br />

and groundnut-7) were rejected either due to poor germination, and/or association with seed borne<br />

fungi (Bipolaris sacchari, Fusarium spp., Botryodiplodia theobromae, Rhizoctonia bataticola, R.<br />

solani) or gram -ve bacteria, store-grain pests, bacteria of unknown etiology and samples for which<br />

FAO designation status was not provided by the consignors.<br />

PQL arranged the export of 284 plant parts dried at 60ºC and ground to 1mm particle size to USA (115<br />

samples of pearl millet flour) and Afghanistan (169 samples of mixed grass of wheat and legume<br />

forage) with two phytosanitary certificates. PQL also arranged export of one bulk consignment (300kg)<br />

of pigeonpea ICPL 88039 to Nepal with phytosanitary certificate. All these consignments were<br />

subjected to phytosanitary measures (inspections and issuance of phytosanitary certificates) through<br />

Plant Quarantine Station, Hyderabad under the Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage,<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, India.<br />

Import:<br />

Applications processed for Import permits: A total of 26 import permit requests were processed for<br />

obtaining import permits to import various plant material, DNA and seed germplasm. Among these,<br />

five import requests were processed through Directorate of Plant Protection, Quarantine and Storage<br />

(DPPQS), Faridabad to import leaves/stem/grain/stover/straw samples of Tef, Sorghum, Maize, Sweet<br />

sorghum, Rice and cowpea from Ethiopia (1000 samples), Zimbabwe (230 samples) and Nigeria (570<br />

samples) whereas 21 import requests were processed through NBPGR to import DNA samples<br />

(Common Bean 92 samples and Maize 896 samples) and seed germplasm (523 samples including<br />

foxtail millet) from 14 countries.<br />

Imports Released: NBPGR, Hyderabad released 1123 germplasm samples consisting of 502 DNA<br />

samples of sorghum, pearl millet and bean from Germany and Bulgaria; and 621 samples of seed<br />

germplasm of different crops, sorghum- 232, pearl millet-261, chickpea-81, cowpea-45 and maize-2<br />

from Mali, Niger, USA & Syria, USA and Ghana, respectively.<br />

We also facilitated the import of 4 consignments containing 1716 samples of wheat straw and cowpea<br />

for nutritional analysis from Pakistan (740), Nigeria (423), Bangladesh (133) and Nepal (420), which<br />

were received by ILRI and submitted to PQL for inspection & release. These consignments were<br />

released after fumigation. These samples were imported under the special import permissions granted<br />

by DPPQS, Faridabad.<br />

81


Grow out test for detection of exotic pests:<br />

Material in Isolation area (RCW 18). Four inspections were carried out for 179 tomato accessions<br />

imported from Taiwan and grown at RCW fields. Late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans was<br />

noticed in some plants. Infected plants were rouged out and incinerated.<br />

Material in PEQIA<br />

Groundnut: 185 accessions from USA were tested. Crop was found healthy during 5 visits in the<br />

growth period. Random plants were detected for the bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and all the<br />

accessions were found free from the pathogen. During harvest, pods were inspected and healthy pods<br />

were released, whereas pods infested with peanut bruchid beetle (Caryedon Serratus) and infected with<br />

Aspergillus spp. and Sclerotium sp. were destroyed. Suspected plants to bacterial wilt infection of the<br />

two accessions EC 655712 and 655661 were tested for ooze test and were found free from the<br />

bacterium.<br />

Sorghum: Six inspections were arranged during crop growth period on 106 accessions of USA and<br />

leaf blight was recorded in 10 accessions (EC 635897, -635910, -635911, -635913, -635916, -635917,-<br />

635924, -635925, -635929, -635945) and all infected plants were rouged-out and incinerated.<br />

Chickpea 39 accessions from Australia and 208 accessions from USA were imported. In these<br />

consignments, during the last sowings in post entry isolation area, very less seed was harvested, hence<br />

original seeds of these consignments was re-sown in greenhouse; crop was inspected twice and found<br />

healthy.<br />

A total of 640 exotic germplasm of sorghum (374- from Mali, USA, France and Kenya), pearl millet<br />

(from Niger -261 samples) and finger millet (from Kenya-05 samples) were planted recently in PEQIA<br />

for screening for exotic pest/pathogen. One hundred forty of the 210 accessions imported from France,<br />

which did not flower during 2005, were planted again this year.<br />

RP Thakur, R Sharma, HD Upadhyaya and NBPGR<br />

Output 2.2: Germplasm of six small millets assembled and conserved germplasm characterized/<br />

evaluated and documented for utilization and knowledge shared with partners<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2.2.2<br />

Output target 2.2.2: Germplasm of six small millets conserved with 50% of germplasm<br />

characterized/evaluated for desirable traits and documented for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Characterize new germplasm/data missing accessions of six small millets for morphoagronomic<br />

traits<br />

Milestone 2.2.2.1: Germplasm of six small millets conserved and characterized/evaluated for desirable<br />

traits and documented for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> has the global responsibility to conserve the germplasm of six small (Finger-, Foxtail, Little-,<br />

Kodo-, Proso-, and Barnyard millet) millets. Geographic and taxonomic gaps were identified in<br />

passport databases of small millets and unique accessions were identified and assembled.<br />

We assembled 28 unique finger millet accessions from the All India Coordinated Small Millets<br />

Improvement Project, ICAR, India to fill gaps in the collection. The Global Crops Diversity Trust<br />

(GCDT) in collaboration with NARS have identified 2,314 accessions of important national finger<br />

millet collections for regeneration and safety duplication at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru genebank over a<br />

period of five years. Out of this, 585 accessions will be directly coming to Patancheru and 1,729<br />

accessions of the national collections from Africa proposed for conservation at the regional genebanks<br />

82


and for safety duplication at Patancheru. These include 1,714 accessions from Nairobi and 15<br />

accessions from Bulawayo.<br />

We assembled 42 new small millets germplasm accessions of finger millet (8 accessions), foxtail millet<br />

(7), proso millet (7), little millet (7), kodo millet (7), and barnyard millet (6 accessions)from Tamil<br />

Nadu, India for conservation and utilization in crop improvement programs. Identified priority areas for<br />

small millets germplasm collection which includes Asia (Bangladesh, China, India, Japan and Korea),<br />

central Africa (Chad), eastern Africa (Rwanda, Tanzania and Zaire), southern Africa (Angola and<br />

Mozambique), and west Africa (Cote d’ Ivoire).<br />

Evaluated finger millet and foxtail millet mini core collections in multilocation ά designed trials with 2<br />

replications for agronomic and quality traits and biotic and abiotic stresses during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season<br />

under BMZ/GTZ collaborative project. Recording of observations is in progress. Analyzed the<br />

multilocation evaluation data of mini core collections of finger millet and foxtail millet trials conducted<br />

during 2009 rainy season and identified trait specific accessions for early flowering (10 accessions) and<br />

high grain yield (8 accessions) in finger millet. IE 196, IE 501, IE 588, IE 2093, IE 2293, IE 2322, IE<br />

3104, IE 4734, IE 4759 and IE 5736 (


<strong>2010</strong> 2.2.1<br />

Output target 2.2.3: Databases of small millets germplasm updated for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Update germplasm databases of small millets<br />

Output target 2.2.4: Germplasm accessions regenerated for conservation and distribution (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Regenerate critical accessions of small millets germplasm<br />

Milestone 2.2.4.1: Germplasm accessions of small millets with limited seed stock/viability regenerated<br />

and seed samples processed to for medium- and long-term conservation (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Regeneration and seed processing for conservation are the critical activities to maintain purity and<br />

integrity of germplasm. Germplasm accessions with low seed stocks and poor viability are regularly<br />

regenerated to update the seed sock with pure, viable and healthy seeds. Germplasm accessions with<br />

low seed stock and poor viability were identified and regenerated and verified for genetic integrity and<br />

tested for moisture content and seed health and processed to active and base collection.<br />

The regenerated germplasm totaling 1,019 accessions from 2009 rainy season was processed for<br />

medium-term storage as active collection/working collection (finger millet – 165 and foxtail millet -<br />

219) to meet immediate user needs and for safety back up storage (finger millet - 360 and foxtail millet<br />

- 275). During <strong>2010</strong> rainy season we planted a total of 509 accessions for seed increase. This includes<br />

finger millet (160), foxtail millet (155), proso millet (106), and barnyard millet (88) for conservation as<br />

active collection and for safety back-up at Svalbard Global Seed Vault. Plant stand was good to secure<br />

sufficient seed stocks in these accessions.<br />

We processed a total of 1, 019 accessions of finger millet and foxtail millet germplasm to add to active<br />

and base collection. Additionally 509 accessions of finger millet, foxtail millet, proso millet, and<br />

barnyard millet were regenerated during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

CLL Gowda and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.2.4.2: Seed viability and health of new and regenerated small millets germplasm tested and<br />

viability of conserved germplasm monitored (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Maintaining purity and viability is a critical activity of genebank management and require regular<br />

monitoring of seed health and viability in active and base collections. Similarly it is required while<br />

updating the seed stocks with freshly regenerated seeds. Accessions with low seed stock and poor<br />

viability identified, regenerated and tested for moisture content, seed health and viability. Similarly<br />

plant health was monitored during regeneration in field.<br />

Viability testing: The seed viability of 480 accessions was tested during this period. This included 315<br />

accessions of finger millet and 165 accessions of foxtail millet regenerated during 2009 rainy season<br />

for medium-term storage and safety back up at Svalbard.<br />

84


Plant health monitoring during regeneration: During the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 509 genebank<br />

germplasm accessions of small millets (finger millet 160, barnyard millet 88, proso millet 106 and<br />

foxtail millet 155) were inspected in the field during active growth period for assessing their health<br />

status. All barnyard and proso millet accessions were found free from quarantine significant pests<br />

whereas three accessions in foxtail millet were found infected with Exserohilum turcicum, leaf blight<br />

pathogen. In finger millet, 40 accessions were found infected with Pyricularia grisea. The infected<br />

plants were rouged out and incinerated and two prophylactic sprays were arranged with carbendazim @<br />

0.2% at weekly interval to avoid the spread of the disease.<br />

RP Thakur, R Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.2.4.3: Small millets germplasm processed for safety back up (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

We deposited 1,000 seed samples of in-trust small millets germplasm at the Svalbard Global Seed<br />

Vault as part of the Agreement between <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and the Nordic Genetic Resources Center, Norway.<br />

Identified the accessions and regenerated the seeds of identified small millet accessions for safety back<br />

up at Svalbard Global Seed Vault. Tested seed health and viability and obtained certification from<br />

National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) in India and processed for safety back up.<br />

As part of this agreement we have deposited 1,000 seed samples of in-trust small millets germplasm at<br />

the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, Norway following standard protocols of seed health testing and<br />

certification by National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (NBPGR) in India. An additional 100<br />

accessions from this set were also sent for germination monitoring in due course of time. The passport<br />

and conservation data on these accessions was successfully uploaded to the public data portal at<br />

www.nordgen.org/sgsv. With these depositions the total number of duplicate samples of <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

germplasm of small millets at the seed vault increased to 7,400 representing finger millet (4,400),<br />

foxtail millet (1,000), proso millet (600), little millet (400), kodo millet (500) and barnyard millet (500).<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

Milestone 2.2.5 : Finger millet collection gaps filled in Tanzania and Kenya and germplasm shared<br />

according to agreed country germplasm sharing regulation (<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Southern Sudan, Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania:<br />

Partners Invovled:<br />

KARI-Kenya, NARO-Uganda, DRD-Tanzania<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Finger millet collection database were acquired, collections mapped and collection gaps identified.<br />

Based on this information and in collaboration with national curators, collection missions were<br />

conducted in the respective countries except for Kenya, where no collection gaps were identified. In<br />

Tanzania, collection targeted the southern part of the country: Sumbawanga, Nkasi and Mbozi districts;<br />

a major millet growing area, but where little is known on its production. Ugandan collection targeted<br />

all major growing areas (Soroti, Kumi, Serere, Apac, Lira, Hoima and Masindi districts). A total of 37<br />

and 92 samples were collected from Tanzania and Uganda respectively. Unique finger millet<br />

accessions have been collected from Uganda and Tanzania. Germplasm is being multiplied in<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Kiboko to provide seed for characterization in the future years.<br />

85


Special project funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Mary Mgonja , Henry Ojulong,<br />

E Manyasa P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

2011 2.2.1<br />

Output target 2.2.5: Germplasm of small millets supplied on request (2011)<br />

Activity: Assure risk-free export and import of small millets germplasm materials<br />

Milestone 2.2.5.1: Requested germplasm of small millets distributed to bona fide users for utilization<br />

(Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

To meet the seed request of small millet germplasm for research use we distributed 1,011 samples<br />

following standard protocols and obtaining SMTA in 20 consignments for research use in three<br />

countries. This includes finger millet (274), foxtail millet (687) and barnyard millet (50). The<br />

distribution include four sets of foxtail millet core collection, one set each of finger millet and foxtail<br />

millet mini core collection and 4 sets of part of finger millet mini core collection. Additionally, 307<br />

germplasm samples representing finger millet (149) and foxtail millet (158) were supplied to scientists<br />

within the institute. The supply included one set of foxtail millet core collection.<br />

RP Thakur, HD Upadhyaya, CLL Gowda and NBPGR<br />

Milestone 2.2.5.2: Requested germplasm of small millets exported for utilization and new germplasm<br />

imported for conservation after seed health evaluation and clearance through NBPGR (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Exported the seed samples of small millets germplasm to meet the seed request of scientists from<br />

overseas and imported the germplasm for updating the gaps in assembly of our germplasm collections.<br />

Seed samples were exported and imported through NBPGR, New Delhi, India.<br />

A total of 122 small millets samples were processed for phytosanitary measures through NBPGR<br />

Hyderabad and exported to two countries along with two phytosanitary certificates. These included 39<br />

foxtail millet samples to China and 83 finger millet samples to Thailand.<br />

Two import permits were processed and NBPGR issued two import permits to import 51 samples from<br />

China, these samples have been received at NBPGR and were under quarantine clearance.<br />

RP Thakur, R Sharma, HD Upadhyaya and NBPGR<br />

86


Output 2.3: Core, and mini-core collections and trait specific germplasm identified and evaluated<br />

and composite collections and reference sets developed and genotyped for utilization and new<br />

knowledge shared with partners<br />

Output target 2.3.1: Core and mini core collections of germplasm established for utilization<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Establish core and mini core collections of staple crops and small millets<br />

Milestone 2.3.1.4: Mini core collection of pearl millet germplasm established for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The large collection of germplasm in genebanks coupled with limited information on traits of economic<br />

importance has resulted in very limited usage of germplasm by crop breeders and thus contributing to a<br />

narrow genetic base in many crops. The concept of core collection (about 10% of the entire collection)<br />

was visualized to enhance the utilization of germplasm in breeding programs. Precise evaluation using<br />

multi-locations and replications of this core for economic traits which show high genotype ×<br />

environment interaction would be resources intensive. To overcome this, development of mini core<br />

collection in crops having large number of accessions has been suggested. The pearl millet mini core<br />

collection comprising of 238 accessions was constituted by using data on 10 morphological and 8<br />

agronomic traits of 2094 core collection accessions. The hierarchical cluster analysis of data using<br />

phenotypic distance matrix was performed. A proportional sampling strategy with 10% or a minimum<br />

of one accession from each cluster was used to form the mini core collection.<br />

Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] exhibits enormous genetic diversity in the global<br />

germplasm collection. The pearl millet core collection (~10% of the entire collection), with 2094<br />

accessions, is still large for precise evaluation to identify parents for a genetic improvement program. A<br />

mini core collection of pearl millet comprising 238 accessions was constituted by using data on 10<br />

qualitative and 8 quantitative traits of 2094 core collection accessions. The hierarchical cluster analysis<br />

of data using a phenotypic distance matrix resulted in 136 clusters. A proportional sampling strategy<br />

with 10% or a minimum of one accession from each cluster was used to form the mini core collection.<br />

The comparison of data in the mini core and core collections using various statistical parameters, such<br />

as homogeneity of distribution for geographical origin and frequency classes of qualitative traits,<br />

means, median, within and between-accession variances, diversity index, and phenotypic correlations,<br />

indicated that almost the entire genetic variation present in the core collection was captured in the mini<br />

core collection. The possible impact of high between- and within-accession variability in pearl millet<br />

on maintenance of genebank accessions is discussed. With its greatly reduced size, the pearl millet mini<br />

core collection can be used for precise evaluation of traits of agronomic importance and biotic and<br />

abiotic stresses as well as mapping with molecular markers for identification of trait-specific<br />

germplasm and discovery of new genes.<br />

The pearl millet mini core collection is a subset of the core, consisting about 10% of the core collection<br />

or 1% of the entire collection and representing its diversity. The pearl millet mini core collection that is<br />

representative of the diversity of the pearl millet core and entire collection will enhance the use of pearl<br />

millet germplasm in breeding programs, molecular studies and discovery of new genes. A journal<br />

article has been accepted for publication in Crop Science (51:217-223)<br />

HD Upadhyaya and CLL Gowda<br />

87


<strong>2010</strong> 2.3.1<br />

Output target 2.3.3: New reference sets of chickpea, groundnut, pigeonpea and sorghum<br />

germplasm (300 accessions each) established and evaluated for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Genotype composite collections for studying diversity and population structure and<br />

developing reference sets of staple crops<br />

Output target 2.3.4: Core, mini core, and or reference sets of germplasm evaluated for utilization<br />

in Asia (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Evaluate core/mini core/reference sets of staple crops and small millets for agronomic traits<br />

Milestone 2.3.4.3: Reference set of sorghum phenotyped for agronomic traits (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Drought is one of the most important abiotic constraints to crop productivity worldwide. Sorghum<br />

reference set was evaluated to identify genetically diverse high yielding drought tolerant sorghum<br />

germplasm in a split plot design with irrigation and rainfed two main plots and three replications.<br />

Sorghum reference set consisting of 384 genetically most diverse accessions was characterized under<br />

well watered (WW) and post flowering water stress (WS) conditions and quality traits<br />

Sorghum reference set characterized under well watered (WW) and post flowering water stress (WS)<br />

conditions showed variability for seed micronutrient contents, Fe and Zn. Four accessions ISs 18879,<br />

18821, 14259, and 3957 had high content of both Fe and Zn both under WW and WS conditions. The<br />

correlation studies showed positive correlation between Fe and Zn content under both WW and WS<br />

conditions across all the groups as well as in the entire set. However, Fe and Zn content were<br />

negatively correlated with yield under both the conditions across all the groups and in the entire set.<br />

The accessions also showed a large range of variation for SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR)<br />

both at flowering and 30 days after flowering (DAF) under WW and WS conditions. Under WW, six<br />

accessions ISs 2398, 29375, 13989, 452 (484) 510, 19262 and 22287 had high SCMR both at flowering<br />

and 30 DAF. Under WS, seven lines ISs 29496, 393 (411) 659, 303, 2398, 22506, 14276, and 29472<br />

had high SCMR both at flowering and 30 DAF. Only one line IS 2398 had shown higher SCMR both<br />

at flowering and 30 DAF both under WW and WS conditions. A large range of variation was observed<br />

for transpiration efficiency under WW and WS conditions. Promising accessions based upon stay-green<br />

character, chlorophyll content, transpiration efficiency and rate of water loss per unit of leaf area under<br />

terminal drought conditions have been identified for multilocational evaluation for stover/grain yield<br />

and component traits.<br />

Sorghum reference set accessions showed large range variation for phenological traits, which is<br />

probably associated due to differences in temperature and photoperiod across diverse test<br />

environments. Large range variations were also observed for SCMR at flowering and 30 days after<br />

flowering (DAF) under well watered (WW) and water-stressed (WS) conditions.<br />

HD Upadhyaya, Shivali Sharma, CLL Gowda,<br />

CT Hash and V Vadez<br />

Performance of germplasm accessions: The efforts on sweet sorghum genetic enhancement for<br />

specific traits like brix% and biomass have started recently. It is critical to identify new sources for<br />

traits like high brix%, juiciness, biomass, photo-insensitivity to improve productivity of sweet<br />

sorghum. As sweet sorghum distillery was established in Nanded, Maharastra, India and it is a partner<br />

in IFAD-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> biofuels project, the accessions collected from that region are also screened for<br />

sugar yield and allied traits.<br />

88


Sweet sorghum germplasm accessions trial-1 (SSGAT-1): A total of 82 germplasm accessions<br />

selected from the sweet sorghum germplasm accessions screening trial conducted during 2008<br />

postrainy season, were evaluated as a trial during in 2009 postrainy season along with the two<br />

controls viz., SSV 84 and CSH 22 SS in RCBD with three replications. The sugar yield ranged from<br />

0.08 to 2.06 t ha -1 (SSV 84: 1.21 t ha -1 ). The following seven germplasm accessions viz., IS 79 (2.06 t<br />

ha-1), IS 70 (1.89 t ha-1), IS 67 (1.66 t ha -1 ), IS 1126 (1.64 t ha -1 ), IS 58(1.63 t ha -1 ), IS 95(1.56 t ha -<br />

1 ), IS 105 (1.53 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior to the best performing control SSV 84 (1.21 t ha -1 ).<br />

Among the entries, days to 50 % flowering ranged from 53 to 82 days (SSV 84: 62 days). plant<br />

height ranged from 1.2 to 3.1 m (SSV 84: 2.2 m) and brix % varied between 6.3% and 16.5 % (SSV<br />

84: 13.33 %) and grain yield ranged from 0.2 t ha -1 to 4.3 t ha -1 (SSV 84 : 2.6 t ha -1 ).<br />

Sweet sorghum germplasm accessions trial-2 (SSGAT-2): A total of 256 germplasm accessions<br />

imported from China were evaluated during in 2009 postrainy season along with the two controls viz.,<br />

SSV 84 and CSH 22 SS, in RCBD with two replications. The sugar yield ranged from 0.08 t ha -1 to<br />

1.34 t ha -1 (SSV 84: 0.54 t ha -1 ). One accession, i.e., IS 30383(1.34 t ha- 1 ) was numerically superior to<br />

the best performing control (ICSV 93046:1.33 t ha -1 ) and the stalk yield ranged from 0.7 to 22.8 t ha -1<br />

(CSH 22SS:13.4 t ha -1 ). Among the screened accessions, days to 50%flowering ranged from 62 to 91<br />

days (ICSV 93046: 90 days); brix % varied from 7.6 to 21.6 % (ICSV 93046: 17.0 %); plant height<br />

ranged from 0.8 to 2.4 m (ICSV 93046: 2.3 m) and the grain yield ranged from 0.1 t ha -1 to 7.3 t ha -1<br />

(ICSV 93046: 0.7 t ha -1 ).<br />

Sweet sorghum germplasm accessions trial-3 (SSGAT-3): A total of 256 germplasm accessions<br />

imported from China were evaluated during in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with the two controls viz., SSV<br />

84 and CSH 22 SS, in RCBD with two replications. The sugar yield among the all germplasm lines<br />

four genotypes viz., IS 41112 (0.9 t ha -1 ), IS 40942 (0.9 t ha -1 ), SP 4487-3 (0.8 t ha -1 ) and IS 41056 (0.8<br />

t ha -1 ) performed superior in sugar yields compared to the best performing control SSV 84 (0.76 t ha -1 ).<br />

Stalk yield ranged from 5.2 to 36.4 t ha -1 (SSV 84: 29.7 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged from<br />

53 to 101 days (CSH 22SS: 80 days). Brix% ranged from 5.8% to 15.8% (SSV 84: 14.0%), while the<br />

plant height ranged from 0.6 m to 3.2m (CSH 22SS: 2.4m).<br />

Sweet sorghum photo-insensitive lines trial-1 (SSPILT-1): A total of 127 germplasm accessions<br />

and 11 B-lines, having similar degree days to 50% flowering in rainy and postrainy seasons obtained<br />

from Generation Challenge Program were evaluated during in 2009 post rainy season along with the<br />

three control cultivars, SS 2016, S 35 and SPV 1411 in RCBD with three replications. The sugar<br />

yield ranged from 0.02 t ha -1 to 0.97 t ha -1 (SS 2016: 0.57 t ha -1 ). Three germplasm accessions viz., IS<br />

22282 (0.97 t ha -1 ), IS 22332 (0.62 t ha -1 ) and IS 11758 (0.61 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior to the<br />

best performing control (SS 2016: 0.57 t ha -1 ) for sugar yield. Among all the genotypes, days to 50 %<br />

flowering ranged from 57 to 142 days; stalk yield ranged from 0.8 to 13.6 t ha -1 (SS 2016: 10.4 t ha -1 ); Brix<br />

% varied from 5.5% to 18.5 % (SS 2016: 11.2% ); and grain yield ranged from 0.1 t ha -1 to 9.7 t ha -1<br />

(SS 2016: 1.36 t ha -1 ).<br />

Sweet sorghum photo-insensitive trial -2 (SSPILT-2): A total of 142 germplasm accessions and 11<br />

B-lines having similar degree days to 50% flowering in rainy and postrainy seasons obtained from<br />

Generation Challenge Program (GCP); 15 lines imported from USDA were evaluated during in 2009<br />

post rainy season along with the three controls, SS 2016, S 35 and SPV 1411 in RCBD with three<br />

replications. The sugar yield in the following four accessions viz. IS 16545 (0.9 t ha -1 ); IS10234 (0.8 t<br />

ha -1 ); IS 4112 (0.5 t ha -1 ); IS 20700 (0.5 t ha -1 ) was superior to the best performing control SPV 1411<br />

(0.49 t ha -1 ). Stalk yield ranged from 2.1 to 96.8 t ha -1 (SPV 1411: 21.5 t ha -1 ). There was wide range of<br />

variation in days to 50% flowering ranging from 58 to 103 days (S35: 69 days). IS 30385 flowered<br />

earliest with 58 days. Brix% ranged from 1.9- 31.6% (SPV 1411: 16.8%), while the plant height ranged<br />

from 0.4 m to 2.9m (SPV 1411: 2.1m).<br />

Sweet sorghum landrace selections trial (SSLST): A land race selections trial was constituted using<br />

22 superior land races selected previously, were evaluated in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, along with two<br />

controls viz., Urja and RSSV 9 in RCBD with three replications. Nine accessions viz., IS 23537 (1.3 t<br />

ha -1 ), IS 23560 (1.3 t ha -1 ), IS 23562 (1.3 t ha -1 ), IS 23574 (1.2 t ha -1 ), IS 23519 (1.1 t ha -1 ), IS 23558<br />

(1.1 t ha -1 ), IS 23525 (1.0 t ha -1 ), IS 41461 (1.0 t ha -1 ) and IS 23528 (1.0 t ha -1 ) were superior for sugar<br />

yield compared to the best performing control RSSV 9 (0.9 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering, among<br />

the entries ranged from 71 to 93 (Urja: 76 days). Among the land races IS 41401 was the earliest to<br />

89


flower with 71 days. The Brix% ranged from 11.3% to 18.0% (Urja: 18.0%), while plant height ranged<br />

from 2.3 m to 4.2 m (RSSV 9: 3.7 m).<br />

Sweet sorghum Ch lines trial (SSCAT): A total of 32 Ch lines selected previously, were evaluated in<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season, along with controls viz., Urja and SPSV 30 in RCBD with two replications. Among<br />

the tested entries, sugar yield ranged from 0.2 t ha -1 to 1.8 t ha -1 (SPSV 30: 1.8 t ha -1 ). The days to 50%<br />

flowering ranged from 67 to 95 days (Urja: 77 days); stalk yield ranged from 7.4 t ha -1 to 29.1 t ha -1<br />

(SPSV 30: 29.0 t ha -1 ); Brix% varied from 10.8 to 18.1% (SPSV 30: 18.1%) and plant height ranged<br />

from 0.6 m to 2.3m (Urja: 2.4m).<br />

Sorghum reference set trial (SRCT): A total of 142 germplasm accessions flowering in the range of<br />

60-100 days were selected from the reference set and screened for sugar yield and biomass along with<br />

five controls viz., CSH 22SS, Urja, JK Recova, RSSV9 and SSV 84 in RCBD with two replications.<br />

Among the screened germplasm accessions, two lines viz., IS 27599 (1.04 t ha -1 ), IS 10876 (0.90 t ha -1 )<br />

were superior to the best performing control Urja (0.76 t ha -1 ) for sugar yield. A wide range of variation<br />

was observed in days to 50% flowering (51 to 87 days). The germplasm accession IS 30441 was<br />

earliest to flower in 51 days. The stalk yield ranged from 4.3 t ha -1 to 58.0 t ha -1 (CSH 22 SS: 58.0 t ha -1 ). The<br />

Brix% ranged from 7.0 to 18.0 %. (Urja: 18.0%). The same trial is being repeated in postrainy season<br />

<strong>2010</strong> to select the best adapted lines for post rainy season.<br />

Sorghum germplasm accessions (PJ and NJ series) trial: The commercial sweet sorghum distillery<br />

i.e. Tata Chemicals Limited (TCL) is located in Nanded, Maharastra, India. In view of the well<br />

documented high GxE in sweet sorghum, it is thought to better screen germplasm accessions collected<br />

from that region. Hence, 70 germplasm accessions collected from that region were taken from the<br />

genebank and were screened for sugar yield and biomass along with five controls viz.,Urja, RSSV 9,<br />

CSH 22SS, JK Recova and SSV 84 during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, in RCBD with two replications. Among<br />

all the screened germplasm accessions, fifty entries were superior to the best performing control Urja<br />

(0.6 t ha -1 ) for sugar yield. The highest sugar yield was recorded by IS 18371 (1.3 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

18360 (1.2 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged between 60 and 89 days. The stalk yield ranged<br />

from 4.7 to 46.9 t ha -1 and 35 entries showed higher stalk yields to the best control JK Recova (23.5 t<br />

ha -1 ). The Brix% ranged from 6.5 to 15.0%. The same trial is being repeated in post rainy season, <strong>2010</strong><br />

to identify post rainy season adapted accessions.<br />

The best performed germplasm accessions identified based on high Brix%, high sugar yield and<br />

biomass will be used in the crossing program to develop improved sweet sorghum cultivars.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

1.<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-IFAD Biofuels Project: “Linking the poor to global markets: Pro-poor development of<br />

biofuel Supply chains” funded by International Fund for Agricultural Development.<br />

2. SWEETFUEL: Sweet sorghum- an alternative bioenergy crop<br />

P Srinivasa Rao and BVS Reddy<br />

Evaluation of the full sorghum reference set for stay-green and chlorophyll content under<br />

terminal drought condition<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania<br />

Partners Invovled:<br />

KAR Kenya, DRD-Tanzania<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Data on days to 50% flowering from the 2008/9 short rains was used to group the 390 Sorghum<br />

reference set lines from India. Seven distinctive groups; each with 10 day interval were obtained, group<br />

six (92-101 days after flowering) was discarded because it had very few entries. The trial was planted<br />

on 19 th June <strong>2010</strong> as single row plots of 3 m length with 2 replications and inter-row spacing of 0.75m<br />

in an augmented design with an average of two controls per group. Irrigation was stopped at 20 days to<br />

90


median of 50% flowering of each group. Days to 50% flowering ranged from an average of 67 in group<br />

1 to 96 in group 7. Short duration plants (group 1) were shorter than the longer duration genotypes<br />

(group 7), while the opposite was true for panicle exertion. Short duration genotypes had more basal<br />

and nodal tillers than the long duration genotypes. For flag leaf characteristics (flag leaf length and<br />

width), short duration genotypes had lower values compared to the long duration genotypes. At flag<br />

leaf initiation, short duration genotypes had fewer green leaves than the long duration. Groups were<br />

significantly different (P


Countries Involved:<br />

India, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Indian Institute of Pulses Research - India; Institute of Agricultural Research - Ethiopia; Kenya<br />

Agricultural Research Institute - Kenya<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Evaluation of pigeonpea germplasm for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera: We evaluated<br />

146 pigeonpea mini core germplasm accessions for resistance to H. armigera along with resistant and<br />

susceptible controls under field conditions using three replications in a randomized complete block<br />

design. Data were recorded on pod borer damage and recovery, resistance on a 1 to 9 rating scale (1 =<br />

80% pods<br />

damaged and pods present only on a few branches), and grain yield. The genotypes ICP 7, ICP 655,<br />

ICP 772, ICP 1071, ICP 3046, ICP 4575, ICP 6128, ICP 8860, ICP 12142, ICP 14471, and ICP 14701<br />

exhibited moderate levels of resistance (damage rating 5.0 as compared to 9.0 in ICPL 87) to pod<br />

borer, H. armigera and these lines also showed good yield potential (> 0.85-1.54 t ha -1 ) under<br />

unprotected conditions, and also had no wilt incidence as compared to 38.2% wilt in ICP 8266.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

ISOPOM project on Helicoverpa resistance- ICAR, Tropical Legumes 1- Gates Foundation<br />

HC Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.1: Mini core collection of pigeonpea germplasm evaluated for resistance to wilt and<br />

sterility mosaic diseases under controlled environment. (2009).<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Reconfirmation of pigeonpea mini-core collections for resistance to wilt and SMD:<br />

To reconfirm resistance to Fusarium wilt (FW) and sterility mosaic disease (SMD) in the five<br />

pigeonpea mini-core collections (ICPs 6739, 11015, 13304, 14976, 15049) identified as resistant to<br />

these diseases during 2009 season, they were revaluated to both the diseases under artificial epiphytotic<br />

conditions in field. One line (ICP 11015) was found resistant (0.1- 10% incidence) to both FW and<br />

SMD. For FW alone ICP 6739 remained asymptomatic (0% incidence). Similarly three lines (ICPs<br />

13304, 14976, 15049) were asymptomatic (0% incidence) to SMD. The susceptible controls for FW<br />

(ICP 2376) and SMD (ICP 8863) were highly susceptible (100% disease incidence).<br />

Suresh Pande, Mamta Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.3: Sorghum mini core collection evaluated for resistance to grain mold and<br />

anthracnose) (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Grain mold and anthracnose are important biotic constraints to grain sorghum production worldwide<br />

92


and are best managed through host plant resistance. A sorghum mini core collection composed of 242<br />

germplasm accessions developed from a core collection of 2246 landrace accessions from 58 countries<br />

was screened to identify sources of grain mold and downy mildew resistance.<br />

Resistance to grain mold: Of 242 sorghum mini core accessions grown for evaluation of grain mold<br />

resistance in 2007 only 140 flowered for which grain mold scoring was done. The same set of 140<br />

accessions and one resistant (IS 8545) and 3 susceptible (SPV 104, Bulk Y and H 112) controls were<br />

screened for resistance to grain mold in the 2008 rainy season in grain mold nursery.<br />

Based on mean grain mold severity for the two years (2007-08), 53 accessions were resistant (grain<br />

mold severity ≤10%), 32 moderately resistant (mold severity 11 to 30%), 25 susceptible (mold severity<br />

31 to 50%) and 30 highly susceptible (mold severity >50%) compared to 83 to 88% severity in<br />

susceptible controls SPV 104 and Bulk Y, respectively, and 2% severity in resistant control IS 8545.<br />

Fifty accessions were found resistant in both the seasons indicating stable resistance in these accessions<br />

for grain mold.<br />

Resistance to Anthracnose: The mini core accessions (242) were evaluated in the 2009 and <strong>2010</strong><br />

rainy seasons for anthracnose resistance along with susceptible control H 112 in the anthracnose<br />

nursery. The accessions were whorl-inoculated with infested sorghum grain (grains colonized by<br />

Colletotrichum graminicola) 30 days after seedling emergence, and high humidity was maintained<br />

through overhead sprinklers twice a day on rain free days till physiological maturity of the grain. The<br />

anthracnose severity was recorded on 10 uniformly flowered plants at the soft dough stage using a<br />

progressive 1-9 scale where 1= no disease and 9 =76-100% leaf area covered with lesions.<br />

Based on mean anthracnose severity for two years, 10 accessions were found resistant (score≤3.0), 105<br />

moderately resistant (score 3.1 to 5.0), 72 susceptible (5.1 to 7.0) and 55 highly susceptible (>7.0)<br />

compared to 8.7 score in the susceptible control H112. Nine accessions (IS 473, -5301, -6354, -10302,<br />

-19153, -20956, -23521, -23684 and -30572) were resistant in both the years indicating stable<br />

resistance in these lines; therefore, these lines can be used in the breeding program to transfer<br />

anthracnose resistance in the elite hybrid parent lines.<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone: Reference collection characterized for Helicoverpa resistance (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Analyzed the data of chickpea reference set evaluated for tolerance to Helicoverpa pod borer during<br />

2008-09 season. Identified ICC 20174, ICC 16903, ICC 14595, ICC 15518, ICC 8522, ICC 9590,<br />

ICC 9875, ICC 9712, ICC 9895, ICC 4182, ICC 15435 with low damage rating score (1.4 – 2.4),<br />

compared to the resistant control cultivar ICC 506 (2.6). Similarly identified ICC 7819, ICC 12537,<br />

ICC 6903, ICC 15435, ICC 13764, ICC 18828, ICC 9862, ICC 4533, ICC 14595, ICC 11498 with<br />

lower larval survival % (48.8-54.1%), compared to ICC 506 (56.8%). Three accessions (ICC 70826,<br />

ICC 16903, ICC 6293 had lower larvae weight (2.1-2.9 gm) compared to the control cultivar ICC 506 (3.1gm).<br />

HC Sharma, HD Upadhyaya and N Lalitha<br />

Milestone: Sorghum mini core collection evaluated for resistance to leaf blight and downy mildew<br />

(2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

93


Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Resistance to downy mildew (Peronosclerospora sorghi): 242 mini core accessions were evaluated in<br />

a greenhouse along with a susceptible control (296 B) and a resistant control (QL 3) using a sandwich<br />

inoculation technique. Of the 242 accessions, 6 were resistant (≤10% incidence), 2 moderately resistant<br />

(11 to 20% incidence), 14 susceptible (21-30% incidence) and the remaining 220 highly susceptible<br />

compared to 100% incidence in the susceptible control (H 112) and 23% in the resistant control (QL 3).<br />

Among the resistant accessions, IS 28747 was free from downy mildew, two accessions (IS 31714 and<br />

IS 23992) recorded ≤5% downy mildew, while three (IS 27697, IS 28449 and IS 30400) had 6 to 10%<br />

incidence.<br />

Resistance to leaf blight: The mini core accessions were evaluated during 2009-10 post-rainy season<br />

in the leaf blight nursery. The accessions were whorl-inoculated with infested sorghum grain (grains<br />

colonized by Exserohilum turcicum) 30 days after seedling emergence, and high humidity was<br />

maintained through overhead sprinklers twice a day on rain free days till physiological maturity of the<br />

grain. The leaf blight severity was recorded on 10 uniformly flowered plants at the soft-dough stage<br />

using a progressive 1-9 scale. Of the 242 accessions, 90 were resistant (score ≤3.0), 109 moderately<br />

resistant (score 3.1 to 5.0), 38 susceptible (score 5.1 to 7.0) and 5 highly susceptible to leaf blight<br />

during 2009-10 screen. These mini core accessions are presently (<strong>2010</strong>-11 postrainy 2001-11 season)<br />

being reevaluated to confirm the resistance.<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone: Pearl millet mini core collection evaluated for resistance to rust (2012)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Pearl millet mini core comprising 238 accessions was evaluated for rust resistance under natural<br />

conditions in the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with susceptible control ICMR 06222. The experiment was<br />

conducted in a RCBD with 2 replications; 1 row of 4 m length/replication. The disease severity was<br />

recorded at soft-dough stage using modified Cobb’s scale. None of the 238 accessions were free from<br />

rust. Nine of 238 accessions (IP -5964, -6057, -6113, -6517, -14599, -11943, -14787, -17396 and<br />

20577) were resistant with ≤10% severity; 64 accessions showed moderate level of resistance (11-<br />

30% severity), 138 accessions were susceptible (31-50%) and remaining 27 accessions showed high<br />

susceptibility to rust under natural infection. The mini core accessions are presently being reevaluated<br />

along with systematic susceptible controls in the rust nursery following artificial inoculation to confirm<br />

resistance in the mini core accessions to rust.<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

2011 2.3.3<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.4: Pearl millet mini core collection evaluated for resistance to downy mildew (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

94


Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Progress/Results: Downy mildew (DM) disease of pearl millet caused by Sclerospora graminicola<br />

(Sacc.) Schroet, is a major biotic constraint severely limiting the production and productivity of the<br />

crop. The most effective and reliable management of this disease can be achieved only through<br />

resistant cultivar. High level of DM resistance is pre-requisite for a cultivar to be released for<br />

commercial cultivation in India and elsewhere. Pearl millet germplasm collection, particularly the<br />

recently developed mini core set could provide some good sources of genetic resistance to this disease.<br />

Pearl millet mini core comprising of 238 accessions and three germplasm controls (IP3616, IP 17862<br />

and IP 22281) were reevaluated for downy mildew (DM) resistance in the DM sick plot using the<br />

infector-row system at Patancheru during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The lines were evaluated along with<br />

systematic susceptible controls 7042S and PMB 11571-2 planted after every 8 test rows. The<br />

experiment was conducted in a RCBD with 2 replications; 1 row of 4 m length/replication. High<br />

humidity (>90%RH) was maintained using overhead perfo irrigation for about 15 days after planting<br />

the test rows to facilitate disease development. Total number of plants and downy mildew infected<br />

plants per plot/entry were recorded at the pre-tillering stage (about 30 days after emergence) and at the<br />

soft-dough stage (about 60 days after emergence). The disease incidence data at the soft-dough stage<br />

was considered for comparison, as there was increase in incidence in some entries at the later stage. Of<br />

238 accessions, 15 (IP 5711, -5869, -6324, -8913, -9645, -9934, -11428, -11546, -11811, -12374, -<br />

14537, -15273, -17396, -20715, and -20955) were highly resistant with no DM, 113 were resistant with<br />

1-10% incidence, 83 were moderately resistant with 11-30% incidence, 27 were susceptible compared<br />

to 100% incidence in known susceptible controls. Results from both 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> seasons indicated<br />

that, 3 accessions (IP 9934, IP 11428 and IP 20715) were highly resistant with no DM across 2 years,<br />

122 were resistant with ≤10% incidence, 90 moderately resistant with 11-30% incidence, 15<br />

susceptible with 31-50% incidence and remaining 8 had >50% DM incidence across 2 years. The<br />

accessions found resistant in the field screen will be evaluated in the greenhouse against diverse<br />

pathotypes to identify genetically diverse DM resistant accessions for use in pearl millet DM resistance<br />

breeding program.<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.6: Foxtail millet core collection evaluated for agronomic traits in India (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Our objective was to enhance rural livelihoods and household food and nutritional security in the<br />

foxtail millet growing regions of India through cultivation of adapted, high yielding cultivars. Foxtail<br />

mini core collection (155 accessions) and five control cultivars were evaluated in alpha design at 10<br />

locations in India.<br />

Multilocation evaluation of 155 accessions of the foxtail millet core collection in different geographical<br />

areas of India, during 2008 rainy season, revealed highly significant genetic and gxe interaction<br />

variances for all the 11 quantitative traits studied such as days to 50% flowering (DF), plant height<br />

(PH), number of basal tillers (BT), flag leaf blade length (FLBL) and width (FLBW), flag leaf sheath<br />

length (FLSL), peduncle length (PEDL), panicle exertion (EXSER), inflorescence length (INFL) and<br />

width (INFW), and panicle weight (PANW). The PC analysis revealed that DF, PH, FLBL, FLSL and<br />

INFL (PC1 group), followed by PEDL and EXSER (PC2 group) were the traits most sensitive to<br />

varying environments. They also showed significant correlation among themselves. Stability analysis<br />

for each trait indicated that these have weak stability while BT and PANW were more stable indicating<br />

that selection in stress environments should be based on yield components. Promising genotypes for<br />

95


high grain yield and wider adaptability (ISe 710, 969, 1820, 49, 388, 842, 1888, 364, 90 and 1767);<br />

salinity (ISe 254, 869, 1888, 1851 and 96) and drought tolerance (ISe 289, 1892, 1474, 1302 and<br />

1108), high grain protein (ISe 1312, 1227 1789 and 1254), Ca (ISe 1227 and 1286), Fe (ISe 1151 and<br />

1286) and Zn (ISe 1286) were identified.<br />

Enhanced cultivation of the superior and diverse foxtail millet germplasm by farmers will increase<br />

productivity, availability of nutritionally rich food, and marketing opportunities, and contribute to insitu<br />

conservation of foxtail millet germplasm in India<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

BMZ/GTZ project on finger millet and foxtail millet.<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Patancheru: HD Upadhyaya, Naresh Dronavalli, CLL Gowda;<br />

Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, India:<br />

NDRK Sharma, Y Narasimhudu and PRK Raju;<br />

University of Agricultural Sciences, Mandya, India:<br />

CR Ravishankar; Rajendra Agricultural University,<br />

Dholi, India: SK Varshney and SK Singh<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.7: Finger millet core collection evaluated for resistance to blast disease (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Nandyal; Agricultural Research Station (ARS),<br />

Vizianagaram; AICRP on Small millet, Zonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Mandya<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

During the past 3 years, considerable progress has been made in establishing the pure cultures of the<br />

pathogen Magnaporthe grisea fm strain, developing field and greenhouse screening techniques and<br />

screening and identifying some accessions resistant to neck and finger blast described below.<br />

Finger millet core collection comprising 622 germplasm accessions was planted in 1 row of 2m/plot in<br />

two replications in RCBD. Systemic susceptible controls (VL 149, VR 708, RAU 8 and PR 202) were<br />

planted on every 5 th row alternatively. Plants were thinned to 20 plants/row 15 days after planting and<br />

other agronomic practices were followed as per local practices. Plants were spray-inoculated at preflowering<br />

stage with an aqueous conidial suspension (1×10 5 spores ml -1 ) of M. grisea fm-strain grown<br />

on oat-meal agar medium at 28 o C for 7 days. High humidity was provided by perfo-irrigation twice a<br />

day on rain-free days, 30 min each in the morning and evening hours to facilitate the disease<br />

development.<br />

Leaf blast was recorded using a progressive 1-9 scale, where 1= no infection and 9=>75% leaf area<br />

infected with typical lesions of blast. Neck blast incidence was recorded at the dough-stage using a 1-5<br />

scale, where 1= pinhead size lesions, 2= 1.0-2.0cm, 3= 2.1-3.0cm, 4= 4.1-6.0cm, 5= >6.0 cm lesions on<br />

the neck region. Finger blast severity (%) estimate was recorded across all panicles/all tillers in a row.<br />

Based on neck blast rating, the accessions were categorized in to: highly resistant (0-1.0), resistant (1.1-<br />

2.0), moderately resistant (2.1-3.0), susceptible (3.1-4.0) and highly susceptible (4.1-5.0). Similarly,<br />

based on finger blast severity (%), accessions were classified into: highly resistant (0-1.0%), resistant<br />

(2-10 %), moderately resistant (11-20%), susceptible (21-30%) and highly susceptible (>30%).<br />

Leaf blast resistance: Most of the lines were free from leaf blast and only a few lines recorded leaf<br />

blast with


Greenhouse evaluation of finger millet mini core for leaf blast resistance against Patancheru<br />

isolate: The greenhouse screening technique to evaluate finger millet for leaf blast resistance was<br />

developed. The screening involves: spray inoculation of 15-day-old potted seedlings with aqueous<br />

conidial suspension as mentioned above and incubating at 22±1°C with >95% RH and leaf wetness<br />

under 12 hr photoperiod for 7 days and recording foliar blast severity 8 th day after inoculation using a 1<br />

– 9 scale.<br />

Finger millet mini core comprising 80 accessions and 4 control lines were evaluated for leaf blast<br />

resistance in a greenhouse screen. Of the 80 accessions and four controls, 22 were found highly<br />

resistant, 43 resistant, 18 moderately resistant and one highly susceptible to leaf blast.<br />

Finger Millet Blast Stability Nursery (FMBRSN – <strong>2010</strong>):Finger millet germplasm accessions have<br />

been evaluated at several locations including Nandyal, Vizianagaram, Mandya, Nagenahalli and<br />

Patancheru in India during 2008 - 09 and some accessions exhibiting resistance to neck and finger blast<br />

have been identified. Some other lines have shown differential reactions at these locations indicating<br />

possible variability in the pathogen population.<br />

Finger Millet Blast Resistance Stability Nursery (FMBRSN) – <strong>2010</strong> has been constituted with the<br />

accessions that showed resistant and variable disease reactions at the above mentioned locations. The<br />

FMBRSN - <strong>2010</strong> consists of 28 finger millet accessions as test entries including one susceptible (VR<br />

708) and one resistant (GPU 28) controls. The nursery is being evaluated at 5 locations: Patancheru,<br />

Mandya, Vizianagaram, Naganahalli and Nandyal.<br />

Three accessions (GPU 28, IE 3077, IE 5066) were found highly resistant to leaf blast (score ≤ 1.0 on 1 – 9 scale) at Patancheru<br />

and another three (IE 2710, IE 4497 and IE 7079) at Mandya. Similarly 4 accessions (GPU 28, IE 5106, IE 4497, IE 2957) were<br />

highly resistant at Vizianagaram and 5 each at Nagenahalli (IE 2911, IE 2957, GPU 28, IE 6337 and IE 4497) and Nandyal (IE<br />

2911, IE2957, IE 4497, IE 6337 and GPU 28). The observations are still to be recorded for neck and finger blast at all locations.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-GTZ/BMZ<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma, HD Upadhyaya, CLL Gowda<br />

NARS Collaborators from Nandyal, Y Narasimhudu,<br />

Vizianagaram PRK Raj and Mandya CR Ravishankar<br />

2011 2.3.1<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.8: Foxtail millet core collection evaluated for resistance to blast disease (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Blast disease of foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] caused by Pyricularia grisea (Cooke)<br />

Sacc. (teleomorph- Magnaporthe grisea) is a major problem in India and Africa causing substantial<br />

yield loss. Management of this disease can best be achieved through host plant resistance. The major<br />

focus in Cereals Pathology has been to screen the core collection of foxtail millet that is available at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Gene bank to identify genetic resistance to this disease.<br />

Foxtail millet core collection comprising of 155 accessions along with 4 controls were planted at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru in a RCBD with 2 replications, 1 row of 2 m long/replication. Plants were<br />

spray-inoculated at tillering stage with an aqueous conidial suspension (1 × 10 5 spores ml -1 ) of P.<br />

grisea fxm-strain. High humidity was provided by perfo-irrigation twice a day on rain-free days, 30<br />

min each during morning and evening hours to facilitate the disease development. Foliar, neck, panicle<br />

and sheath blast were recorded at dough stage. Of 155 accessions, 10 accessions did not germinate.<br />

One hundred forty one accessions were highly resistant to leaf blast without any infection compared to<br />

4 accessions (ISe 1129, ISe 1299, ISe 1037 and ISe 1118) that had 7-9 score on 1-9 scale. Seventeen<br />

97


accessions (ISe 375, -480, -748, -751, -769, -1037, -1067, -1204,-1320, -1335, -1387, -1419, -1547, -<br />

1593, -1685, -376 and -1541) were resistant ( ≤5% incidence) to neck and panicle blast confirming<br />

last year’s results. Seven accessions (ISe 237, ISe 717, ISe 1000, ISe 1204, ISe 1251, ISe 1320 and ISe<br />

1674) were resistant to sheath blast and remaining accessions had 10-90% incidence.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

BMZ/GTZ Project on finger millet and foxtail millet<br />

RP Thakur, Rajan Sharma, HD Upadhyaya, CLL Gowda<br />

NARS Collaborators from Nandyal, Y Narasimhudu,<br />

Vizianagaram PRK Raju and Mandya CR Ravishankar<br />

Activity: Evaluate Core and mini core collections for resistance to important abiotic stresses<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.9: Groundnut mini-core collection screened for root traits (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Completed in reported in 2009 archival<br />

V Vadez, HD Upadhyaya, RK Varshney and CLL Gowda<br />

2011 2.3.4<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.11: Sorghum mini-core or reference set screened for root traits (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Although sorghum is known to be adapted to dry situation and to be deep rooted, there is still large<br />

variation in root traits. The work was undertaken to identify germplasm (from the reference set) with<br />

high capacity to extract water from the soil profile when exposed to typical postrainy conditions (water<br />

stress appearing after flowering).<br />

One hundred and forty nine germplasm entries from the sorghum reference set lines, having limited<br />

variation in the flowering time, and three control cultivars were evaluated under terminal water stress<br />

and fully irrigated conditions, using lysimeters (see detailed description in http://www.icrisat.org/btroot-research.htm.<br />

A ten-fold range for seed yield and harvest index (HI), two-fold range for transpiration efficiency (TE)<br />

and a 1.25 fold variation for water extraction were observed under terminal water stress. Transpiration<br />

efficiency and water extraction under water stress related poorly to that under fully irrigated conditions.<br />

A large genotype-by-water treatment interaction was noted. Although the range of variation for water<br />

extraction was small, the 3 L difference in total water extraction was estimated as differences in the full<br />

extraction profile of about 400 mm. Among races, Durra had highest water extraction capacity and TE,<br />

whereas Caudatum had poor water extraction but high TE. Although yield was closely related to HI, at<br />

any level of HI there was substantial yield difference remaining unexplained, and these residual yield<br />

variations were closely related to transpiration efficiency (R 2 = 0.60). Similarly, substantial yield<br />

98


variations that were still not explained by HI or TE were closely related to the total water extracted<br />

under water stress (R 2 = 0.35). These results were confirmed by a multilinear regression analysis,<br />

which also showed the importance of water extracted during the grain filling period. These data<br />

indicate that large range of variation exists in the sorghum germplasm for TE and the capacity to<br />

extract water from the soil profile, and each contributes to a substantial yield differences under terminal<br />

drought (Fig 1). The lysimetric system proved to be critical to precisely assess yield component traits<br />

and assess their respective importance on yield.<br />

Figure 1. Total water extracted from the lysimeter soil profile (g plant -1 ) under terminal water stress conditions (a)<br />

and well-watered conditions (b) in 152 germplasm entries arranged in the same order as in (a). Data are the mean of<br />

3 replicated lysimeter-grown plants per genotype. Bar indicates LSD<br />

These data indicate the potential of the lysimetric system to accurately assess the different components<br />

of the Passioura’s equation, in a way that allows the respective weighing of their importance under<br />

different watering regime.<br />

V Vadez, HD Upadhyaya, RK Varshney and CLL Gowda<br />

Activity: Evaluate mini core and/or reference sets for important abiotic stresses<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.13: Mini core collection of groundnut evaluated for resistance to seed infection by<br />

Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination (2009)<br />

Progress reported:<br />

50%<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

After 2008-09 post rainy experiment, no trial was conducted during 2009-10 postrainy season. Hence<br />

there is no further advancement in the proposed activity from previous year. However, during <strong>2010</strong>-11<br />

99


postrainy season, 184 mini core accessions are being planted in the A. flavus sick field for systematic<br />

evaluation for resistance to seed infection by Aspergillus flavus and subsequent aflatoxin<br />

contamination.<br />

H Sudini and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.18: Reference sets of chickpea, pigeonpea, and groundnut evaluated for salinity<br />

tolerance (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Results on pigeonpea for the mini core collection reported earlier and not assessed for the reference<br />

collection<br />

Legumes are generally considered sensitive to salinity, but the salinity resistance of large number of<br />

germplasm has rarely been explored. This study aimed to: (i) determine whether there is consistent<br />

genetic variation for salinity resistance in the chickpea and groundnut mini-core and reference<br />

collections; (ii) assess the strength of the relationship between the yield under saline conditions and that<br />

under non-saline conditions; and (iii) identify contrasting sets of entries.<br />

Chickpea and groundnut germplasm from the mini core collection and reference set (chickpea) were<br />

planted in 25 cm diameter pots, filled with 7.5 kg of Vertisol (chickpea) or 10kg of Alfisol (groundnut).<br />

Salt treatment consisted in an application of a 80 mM NaCl solution in sufficient amount to saturate the<br />

soil profile. This corresponded to a 0.94 g/kg Alfisol and 1.17 g/kg in the Vertisol. Salt treatment was<br />

applied in 3 split doses at sowing (1/3), and approximately 10 and 20 days after sowing. Subsequent<br />

irrigation was done with soft water. Plants were grown in pots outside, buried in the ground, and plants<br />

harvested at maturity. Four chickpea plants and two groundnut plants per pot were used.<br />

Chickpea – Several trials were carried out between 2005 and 2009. There was a large variation in seed<br />

yield among the genotypes in the saline pots, and a small genotype by environment interaction for grain<br />

yield in both soil types. The non-saline control yields explained only 12 to 15% of the variation of the<br />

saline yields indicating that evaluation for salinity resistance needs to be conducted under saline<br />

conditions. The reduction in yield in the saline soil compared with the non-saline soil was more severe<br />

in the Alfisol than in the Vertisol, but rank order was similar in both soil types with a few exceptions.<br />

Yield reductions due to salinity were closely associated with fewer pods and seeds per pot (61 to 91%)<br />

and to lesser extent from less plant biomass (12 to 27%), but not seed size. A group of consistently<br />

salinity resistant genotypes was identified for use as donor sources, for crossing with existing chickpea<br />

cultivars (Table 1). (Details in Krishnamurthy et al., 2011 – J. Agron. Crop. Sci).<br />

Table 1. Best linear unbiased predicts of genotypes (BLUPs) for days to 50% flowering, shoot<br />

biomass and seed yield for the group of consistently highly resistant accessions (n=12) in a<br />

Vertisol (2005-06) and an Alfisol (2007-08) soil.<br />

Vertisol (2005-06) Alfisol (2007-08)<br />

-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------<br />

Days to Shoot Grain Days to Shoot Grain<br />

50% biomass yield 50% biomass yield<br />

Accession flowering (g pot -1 ) (g pot -1 ) flowering (g pot -1 ) (g pot -1 )<br />

ICC 456 61 24.4 10.7 55 26.5 11.3<br />

ICC 791 63 33.4 10.3 68 25.4 9.0<br />

ICC 1710 65 32.0 10.4 67 25.7 8.5<br />

ICC 3325 63 28.0 9.7 54 27.1 9.7<br />

ICC 4918 43 30.8 9.9 50 25.5 9.9<br />

ICC 5613 52 30.8 9.6 46 23.5 7.8<br />

ICC 6279 45 28.4 11.1 43 25.5 11.1<br />

100


Vertisol (2005-06) Alfisol (2007-08)<br />

-------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------<br />

Days to Shoot Grain Days to Shoot Grain<br />

50% biomass yield 50% biomass yield<br />

Accession flowering (g pot -1 ) (g pot -1 ) flowering (g pot -1 ) (g pot -1 )<br />

ICC 9942 57 31.9 12.8 54 32.4 15.7<br />

ICC 11121 60 30.5 11.0 60 26.9 10.7<br />

ICC 12155 60 32.1 10.1 50 26.0 12.4<br />

ICC 14799 60 35.8 10.6 60 25.1 8.6<br />

ICCV 95311 46 28.2 10.2 45 25.7 9.1<br />

Please Add SE±, CV%, CD in table 1.<br />

Groundnut: A total of 275 genotypes of groundnut including genotypes from putatively salinity<br />

affected areas were screened across three different seasons for shoot biomass and seed yield, under<br />

saline and non-saline conditions. Shoot biomass under saline conditions showed limited genotypic<br />

variation and was not kept as a selection criterion. In comparison, a six-fold range of variation for pod<br />

yield under salinity (10-12.5 dSm -1 NaCl) was observed. Pod yield under saline and non-saline<br />

conditions were poorly related.. Although the genotypic variation for pod yield under saline conditions<br />

was large, it also showed large G×E interaction. We report a set of 14 tolerant and 17 sensitive<br />

genotypes, consistently contrasting across years for pod and seed yield and pod and seed numbers<br />

under saline conditions across seasons, and those could be used in breeding (Table 2). Our attempt to<br />

increase the frequency of tolerant lines by selecting landraces from putatively salinity affected area was<br />

not successful and the mini core collection of germplasm provided most of the salinity tolerant entries.<br />

Table 2. List of 14 most tolerant and 17 most susceptible genotypes, including germplasm type (MC, minicore,<br />

BL, breeding line) and origin, and data o days to flowering, shoot dry weight at maturity (SDW) and<br />

pod weight at maturity (PW) from two seasons evaluation under saline (S, 1.17 g NaCl kg-1 soil) and control<br />

(C, 0 g NaCl) conditions. Data are the mean (± SE) of 3 replicated pots (containing 2 plants pot-1)<br />

Genotype Type Origin Season Days to<br />

flower (DAS)<br />

SDW (g pot -1 ) PW (g pot -1 )<br />

Tolerant S C S C S C<br />

ICG 5195 MC Sudan 2006 34 25 19.0 ± 1.60 28.1 ± 1.12 12.6 ± 0.16 22.4 ± 3.55<br />

2006-07 45 42 18.3 ± 0.11 35.6 ± 5.44 17.1 ± 0.81 34.9 ± 6.43<br />

ICGV 86156 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 30 28 15.4 ± 2.03 23.7 ± 5.50 13.7 ± 1.5 14.1 ± 2.02<br />

2006-07 51 40 11.0 ± 2.51 26.1 ± 0.11 23.1 ± 3.15 44.2 ± 3.82<br />

ICG (FDRS)10 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 28 25 25.8 ± 8.10 35.3 ± 3.12 11.5 ± 4.60 19.8 ± 3.44<br />

2006-07 52 39 25.1 ± 0.01 41.3 ± 5.00 24.5 ± 3.33 45.1 ± 3.09<br />

ICGV 99181 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 32 29 14.9 ± 1.03 32.3 ± 9.69 9.4 ± 1.33 14.6 ± 0.38<br />

2006-07 39 37 17.1 ± 1.62 29.7 ± 3.52 22.2 ± 2.41 49.4 ± 2.42<br />

ICGV 00309 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 38 27 14.1 ± 1.75 32.6 ± 10.3 12.2 ± 1.67 26.5 ± 4.38<br />

2006-07 59 37 16.7 ± 2.29 29.4 ± 6.58 24.5 ± 4.04 34.3 ± 8.59<br />

ICGS 44 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 33 28 13.3 ± 1.24 29.8 ± 5.53 9.5 ± 0.37 33.6 ± 13.52<br />

2006-07 47 43 21.5 ± 3.58 23.9 ± 0.81 23.2 ± 2.48 52.7 ± 6.45<br />

ICG 442 MC USA 2006 34 24 13.1 ± 1.86 55.3 ± 5.55 7.6 ± 1.30 20.5 ± 5.17<br />

2006-07 45 41 17.6 ± 1.08 26.6 ± 3.28 20.6 ± 0.57 40.7 ± 4.44<br />

ICG 7283 MC Paraguay 2006 32 26 16.2 ± 2.14 29.4 ± 2.93 9.5± 2.53 28.9 ± 0.85<br />

2006-07 45 26 17.5 ± 6.12 27.2 ±12.27 26.1 ± 6.13 32.4 ± 14.08<br />

ICG 1711 MC Boliva 2006 30 27 12.9 ± 2.45 30.6 ±1.69 10.5 ± 2.57 24.1 ± 4.60<br />

2006-07 44 39 20.5 ± 1.91 40.9 ± 6.25 18.0 ± 2.65 36.4 ± 7.66<br />

ICGV 86155 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 33 30 15.8 ± 2.73 36.7 ± 5.40 11.6 ± 1.47 28.5 ± 8.03<br />

2006-07 75 41 9.42 ±1.85 28.9 ± 5.45 25.2 ± 1.46 35.9 ± 9.61<br />

ICG 2106 MC India 2006 36 28 18.0 ± 3.81 30.9 ± 3.46 10.7 ± 3.39 17.9 ± 0.91<br />

2006-07 75 41 16.7 ± 1.17 36.1 ± 4.33 23.4 ± 0.77 45.4 ± 0.92<br />

ICGS 76 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 37 35 17.2 ± 2.12 47.8 ± 11.11 11.7 ± 2.89 34.7 ± 14.01<br />

2006-07 54 54 19.1 ± 0.83 37.4 ± 4.04 27.2 ± 1.64 42.3 ± 6.55<br />

ICG 1519 MC India 2006 37 27 14.6 ± 0.52 45.5 ± 15.37 11.3 ± 2.54 21.7 ± 5.32<br />

2006-07 77 43 13.8 ± 1.70 29.4 ± 2.58 25.2 ± 4.51 39.7 ± 2.54<br />

ICGV 87187 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 36 17 11.0 ± 2.21 17.3 ± 0.52 14.4± 1.75 29.6 ± 0.88<br />

2006-07 56 51 17.9 ± 0.83 33.3 ± 0.60 25.2 ± 1.11 48.4 ± 0.11<br />

Susceptible<br />

ICG 6402 MC Unknown 2006 33 29 11.4 ± 2.88 31.6 ± 2.72 1.6 ± 1.11 14.8 ± 2.19<br />

2006-07 73 43 17.6 ± 2.1 34.2 ± 0.5 12.1 ± 5.64 51.6 ± 1.49<br />

ICG 5149 MC Paraguay 2006 30 26 13.6 ± 1.58 59.0 ± 8.60 3.1 ± 1.94 16.08 ± 6.59<br />

2006-07 42 37 26.4 ± 1.21 40.5 ± 1.41 11.6 ± 0.32 33.9 ± 8.33<br />

ICGV 92196 BL <strong>ICRISAT</strong> 2006 37 29 8.8 ± 2.75 34.1 ± 4.05 3.8 ± 1.74 26.3 ± 3.36<br />

2006-07 44 45 8.8 ± 2.32 48.4 ± 9.86 20.9 ± 0.81 37.9 ± 4.53<br />

ICG 6993 MC Brazil 2006 38 33 4.1 ± 2.97 22.6 ± 0.16 1.5 ± 0.59 4.9 ± 2.01<br />

2006-07 54 50 28.1 ± 3.18 68.6 ± 4.57 15.9 ± 4.28 26.1 ± 6.50<br />

ICG 13856 MC Uganda 2006 36 26 11.5 ± 2.04 37.5 ± 0.05 6.7 ± 0.86 31.1 ± 2.20<br />

2006-07 81 42 11.6 ± 1.18 24.7 ± 3.19 14.1 ± 6.16 34.9 ± 5.56<br />

ICG 8083 MC Russia / CISs 2006 26 23 6.3 ± 1.38 20.7 ± 1.66 5.5 ± 0.93 17.9 ± 1.75<br />

101


High contrast exists for salinity tolerance in groundnut and chickpea. In chickpea, sensitivity to salt<br />

stress is related to the sensitivity of reproduction and similar trend is very likely in groundnut.<br />

V Vadez, HD Upadhyaya and RK Varshney<br />

Activity: Evaluate groundnut and sorghum mini core and/or reference sets for transpiration<br />

efficiency (TE) and root traits<br />

Milestone 2.3.5.19 C.5.3.5: C ¹³ in chickpea analyzed at JIRCAS (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India and Japan<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

JIRCAS, UAS Bangalore, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

As indicated in the previous report, the field trial at Patancheru was repeated again in 2009-<strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

trial with the reference set was planted on 31 Oct 2009 under two soil moisture conditions. The pattern<br />

of receding soil moisture was normal except for a 39 mm rain on 14 Jan <strong>2010</strong> when most early duration<br />

accessions had already reached the physiological maturity. The data on SLA, SCMR and phenology<br />

were recorded. Similar to the previous year data, data from 2009-10 had also shown a large and<br />

significant variation across the soil moisture regimes for most of the traits monitored including Δ 13 C (Table 3).<br />

Table 3. Means (BLUPs) and range of various traits observed both under drought stressed and<br />

optimally irrigated environments of the 280 accessions of the reference set of chickpea<br />

germplasm during 2009-10 postrainy season in a Vertisol.<br />

Drought stressed<br />

Optimally irrigated<br />

_______________<br />

_________________<br />

Characteristics Mean Range Mean Range<br />

Days to 50% flowering 48 35-66 53 36-64<br />

Days to maturity 95 79-115 112 108-117<br />

Shoot biomass (kg ha -1 ) 4120 2822-5499 6781 3566-8926<br />

Seed yield (kg ha -1 ) 1518 442-2314 1522 694-2311<br />

Harvest index 38 11-57 23 11-38<br />

Pod number plant -1 43 21.2-71.2 49 28.6-86.9<br />

Seeds pod -1 1.1 0.77-1.37 1.2 0.9-1.6<br />

100 seed weight (g) 17.3 9.2-44.8 15.1 8.1-33.9<br />

Shoot biomass (kg ha -1 day -1 ) 43.5 28.4-57.3 60.4 32.7-78.4<br />

Seed yield (kg ha -1 day -1 ) 33.4 7.7-53.5 25.7 13.2-37.7<br />

Under drought stress, there was a large range in Δ 13 C value of the accessions and this ranged between -<br />

27.2 to -24.2. However, it was very narrow and between -28.6 to -27.4 under optimally irrigated<br />

conditions. The seed yield per day (seed yield/ days of reproductive growth duration) or water use<br />

efficiency (WUE) under terminal drought stress prone condition was significantly associated with the<br />

Δ 13 C (Fig. 2) like the observation in previous year. It was interesting to note that Δ 13 C was not only<br />

related to WUE but also with the phenology, shoot biomass, seed yield. Surprisingly Δ 13 C was not<br />

correlated with SLA or SPAD values. But there was a good negative correlation between SLA and<br />

SPAD values (r = -0.38 *** ). The narrow range of Δ 13 C values observed under optimally irrigated<br />

condition was not associated with the phenology or the yield component traits.<br />

102


y = -8.38x - 182.7<br />

R 2 = 0.25***<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

WUE (Kg ha -1 d -1 )<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

-27.5 -27 -26.5 -26 -25.5 -25 -24.5 -24<br />

Delta C<br />

Figure 2. The relationship between the Δ 13 C and the rate of grain yield accumulation (kg ha -1<br />

day -1 ) in the 280 accessions of the chickpea reference collection during 2008-09 growing season<br />

Genotyping of the reference set with DArT markers<br />

A set of 288 chickpea genotypes from the reference set were genotyped using DArT markers and 1157<br />

polymorphic markers were identified. Based on the availability of both genotyping and phenotyping<br />

data, 270 genotypes from the reference set were used for marker trait association studies.<br />

Linkage disequilibrium based marker trait associations<br />

In order to identify the number of subpopulations, STRUCTURE analysis (Pritchard et al 2000) was<br />

performed, which estimates the natural logarithm of the probability Ln P(D) of given genotype, being<br />

part of a given population K. By the Bayes Model-based Clustering Analysis, the highest likelihood<br />

value (Ln P(D)), correspond to the most probable number of subpopulations. In order to find the best<br />

value of K, the program was run for 4 times fitting K from 2 to 20, under “admixture model”, for the<br />

DArT markers (Figure 2). However conclusive K value could not be determined, hence for determining<br />

the number of sub-populations, principal component analysis (PCA) in TASSEL 2.01 was used. As a<br />

result, 17 sub-populations were identified in the reference set which represent >70% of the variation<br />

existing the germplasm used. Further, in order to reduce the number of false positive associations both<br />

population structure and relative kinship information were employed. Both generalized linear model<br />

(GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM) in TASSEL 2.01 software (Andersen et al. 2005) were<br />

employed for establishing marker trait associations.<br />

Markers associated with various root traits like root volume (cpPb-172290, cpPb-324158), root length<br />

(cpPb-677692), root dry weight (cpPb-489251), root surface area (cpPb-324158, cpPb-172290),<br />

rooting depth (cpPb-325441) and root length density (cpPb-677692) and carbon isotope discrimination<br />

trait (cpPb-680078, cpPb-490776) were identified (Table 4-5). Most of the associations identified for<br />

root volume, root dry weight root surface area by GLM were also identified by MLM. The markers<br />

associated with root volume and root surface area were mapped on linkage group (LG 3) on the high<br />

density inter-specific map developed using the mapping population ICC 4958 × PI 489777. However,<br />

markers associated with rooting depth and root length density are not mapped. Marker trait associations<br />

were detected only under rainfed conditions using GLM model. However MLM analysis detected<br />

marker trait association for under rainfed and irrigated conditions (Table 4-5).<br />

Table 4. Marker trait associations identified using generalized linear model (GLM)<br />

Locus LG Trait* p-value Rsq_Marker<br />

cpPb-172290 LG3 Root volume 0.000999 0.0382<br />

cpPb-324158 LG3 Root volume 0.000999 0.0386<br />

cpPb-489251 Not mapped Root Dry Weight 0.004000 0.0361<br />

cpPb-677692 Not mapped Root length density 0.015000 0.0315<br />

cpPb-172290 LG3 Root surface area 0.009000 0.0319<br />

cpPb-324158 LG3 Root surface area 0.011000 0.0322<br />

cpPb-680078, LG7 CID 0.00099 0.045<br />

cpPb-490776 LG2 CID 0.00099 0.00329<br />

*CID=carbon isotope discrimination<br />

103


Table 5. Marker trait associations identified using mixed linear model (MLM)<br />

Locus LG Trait* p-value Rsq_marker<br />

cpPb-324158 LG3 Root volume 0.0013 0.033<br />

cpPb-172290 LG3 Root volume 0.0014 0.0323<br />

cpPb-489251 Not mapped Root Dry Weight 0.0028 0.0279<br />

cpPb-324158 LG3 Root surface area 0.0047 0.0235<br />

cpPb-677692 Not mapped Root length density 0.0048 0.0255<br />

cpPb-172290 LG3 Root surface area 0.0051 0.0229<br />

cpPb-325441 Not mapped Rooting depth 0.0059 0.031<br />

cpPb-325885 Not mapped Root length density 0.0115 0.021<br />

cpPb-677692 Not mapped root length 0.012 0.0206<br />

cpPb-327820 LG1 DeltaC_IR 0.0043 0.045<br />

cpPb-323939 LG2 DeltaC_IR 0.0029 0.0292<br />

cpPb-490776 LG2 DeltaC_RF 0.0018 0.0295<br />

cpPb-676245 LG2 DeltaC_RF 0.0089 0.0305<br />

cpPb-171591 LG3 DeltaC_IR 0.0044 0.0329<br />

cpPb-488627 LG3 DeltaC_RF 0.008 0.0315<br />

cpPb-675517 LG4 DeltaC_RF 0.0066 0.0291<br />

cpPb-491344 LG5 DeltaC_IR 0.0044 0.0321<br />

cpPb-678284 LG5 DeltaC_RF 0.002 0.0308<br />

cpPb-680078 LG7 DeltaC_RF 0.001 0.0291<br />

cpPb-680777 LG8 DeltaC_IR 0.0058 0.0318<br />

*Delta C_IR= under optimally irrigated conditions; and DeltaC_RF= under terminal drought<br />

conditions<br />

Special project funding: GCP SP3 G2008<br />

L Krishnamurthy, Rajeev Varshney, Pooran M Gaur and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Groundnut for TE<br />

Completed and reported in 2009 archival<br />

Sorghum<br />

Sorghum is usually cultivated under water limited conditions and as such, identification of entries that<br />

are capable of maximizing water productivity is an important endeavor. Further, there is evidence of<br />

genotypic variation for TE in sorghum, although this has been done in small range of germplasm.<br />

Therefore, an assessment was done here in a large number of entries, in a routine pot trial.<br />

Plants were grown under well-watered conditions until about 4 weeks after sowing. Then a set of plants<br />

is harvested to assess biomass at that stage. Then two sets of plants are used as water stress (WS) and<br />

well watered treatment. Pots are bagged to avoid soil evaporation. Progressive water deficit is imposed<br />

to the water stress treatment by limiting the maximum amount of water loss per day. Pot weight is<br />

taken every day. Once WS plants have exhausted the pot water, plants are harvested, biomass measured<br />

and TE calculated as the ratio of the biomass increase during the dry down, divided by the amount of<br />

water transpired during that time.<br />

A large range of variation was found (from 4.13 to 9.20 g biomass kg-1 water transpired). The trial<br />

mean value in 2009-10 was relatively lower (6.12 g biomass kg -1 water transpired) than the trial mean<br />

of 2008-09 (8.60 g biomass kg -1 water transpired). Yet, these data were in the range of those reported<br />

by other scholars (Yin et al., 2009; Balota et al., 2008; Hammer et al., 1997; Donatelli et al., 1992).<br />

There was a significant relation between the values obtained in the previous year. Therefore the data<br />

from the two years were averaged. The chart below provides the range of variation for TE across two<br />

years, i.e. a range between 6 and 10 g biomass kg -1 water transpired (Fig. 3). This work allows the<br />

identification of contrasting germplasm, having differences in TE under well watered conditions. Two<br />

measurements of SPAD value were done on the most fully expanded leaf during the course of the<br />

experiment, i.e. at 1 and 3 weeks after initiating the experiment and where plants were 5 and 7 weeks<br />

104


old. The purpose of measuring SPAD was to test whether TE data could be related to SPAD data, as it<br />

has been attempted in groundnut. The SPAD value varied between 30 and 60 in both measurements<br />

and were closely related (R 2 = 0.42). However, there was absolutely no relationship between TE and<br />

any of the SPAD measurement, showing that TE could not be measured with SPAD reading<br />

differences.<br />

TE (g biomass kg-1 water<br />

transpired)<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

387 entries tested<br />

Figure 3. Range of variation of TE across two years in sorghum reference set<br />

V Vadez, L Krishnamurthy and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Output target 2.3.6: Reference sets evaluated and genotyped for enhanced utilization<br />

Activity: Investigation of genetic diversity of chickpea and groundnut reference sets and assessing its<br />

relevance with drought avoidance root traits<br />

Milestone 2.3.6.1: Chickpea reference set phenotyped for root traits in PVC cylinders (120cm height)<br />

(2009)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India and Japan<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

JIRCAS, UAS Bangalore, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

To improve the prospects of identification of a major QTL for the root traits as well as the desire to<br />

improve the robustness of the molecular markers that would be identified, it was decided to continue<br />

the root phenotyping for the third season. The experiment was sown in an alpha design with three<br />

replications in cylinders as in previous tests. The sowing was done during 22 and 26 Dec 2009 and<br />

harvested during 26 to 30 Jan <strong>2010</strong>. The rooting depth, root dry weight, root volume, root surface area<br />

and the root length density were the root-related data collected along with the shoot dry weight of these<br />

two plants from each cylinder. The plant growth in this trial was good. The rooting depth ranged from<br />

91 to 105 cm, root dry weight from 0.64 to 1.35g cylinder -1 (Fig 4) and the root length density from<br />

0.28 to 0.41 cm cm -3 . The root dry weight of the accessions recorded in this trial was well associated to<br />

the ones observed in the previous year (2008-09) (Fig 5). Similarly the root length density (r 2 = 0.14)<br />

and the shoot dry weights (r 2 = 0.35) were also closely associated.<br />

105


1.5<br />

Root dry weight (g cylinder -1 )<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

1 17 33 49 65 81 97 113 129 145 161 177 193 209 225 241 257 273 289<br />

Reference set<br />

Figure 4. The range of root dry weights (best linear unbiased predictors) observed in the<br />

reference collection of the chickpea germplasm in 2009-10<br />

0.90<br />

Root dry weight (g cylinder -1 ) in 2008-09<br />

0.80<br />

0.70<br />

0.60<br />

0.50<br />

0.40<br />

y = 0.362x + 0.228<br />

r 2 = 0.37***<br />

0.30<br />

0.30 0.50 0.70 0.90 1.10 1.30 1.50<br />

Root dry weight (g cylinder -1 ) in 2009-10<br />

Figure 5. The relationship between the root dry weights of the reference of the chickpea<br />

germplasm recorded in 2008-09 and 2009-10<br />

Special Project Funding<br />

TL1<br />

L Krishnamurthy, N Lalitha, Rajeev Varshney,<br />

Pooran M Gaur and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.3.6.4: Groundnut reference set genotyped with 100 SSR markers (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

UAS-B<br />

106


Progress/Results:<br />

Groundnut reference set was grown during 2009-10 post-rainy season and leaf samples were collected<br />

to extract the DNA for genotyping. A set of 154 SSR markers are chosen from the consensus genetic<br />

map prepared with 293 marker loci. The markers were chosen based on whole genome coverage and<br />

their uniform distribution on all linkage groups. Diversity analysis was done for 154 SSR genotyping<br />

data using PowerMarker V3.25 and DARwin 5.0.128. A total of 3,295 alleles were detected ranging<br />

from a minimum of 3(GM1135) to a maximum of 79 (GM2120) with an average of 21.3 alleles per<br />

locus. The polymorphic information content (PIC) value varied from 0.07 (GM1416) to 0.97<br />

(GM2120) with average 0.69. Major allele frequency was very low for GM2120 (0.09) due to presence<br />

of high variability for this locus and highest for GM1416 (0.96) indicating most of the genotypes had<br />

the same locus. A total of 64 markers did not exhibit any heterozygosity, while variation was high<br />

among remaining markers ranging from 0.003 (GM1603, GM1846, GM1907, S11, PM183) to 0.996<br />

(GM2215) with an average of 0.102 per locus. Wilds and cultivated clustered separately and similar<br />

separate clustering was also observed grouping based on species, sub-species and genomes (Figure 6).<br />

HD Upadhyaya, Mansee, Sriswathi, MK Pandey and RK Varshney<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Sub.species<br />

Hypogaea<br />

C<br />

Sub species.hypogaea (red); Sub species. fastigata<br />

(green); Sub species capibarensis (black)<br />

D<br />

AA genome (red); AABB genome (blue); BB genome<br />

(green); EE genome (pink); EX genome (yellow); PP<br />

genome (brown)<br />

•Wild species ;Cultivated<br />

Figure 6. Clustering pattern of 307 reference set genotypes based on 154 SSR markers.<br />

Distribution of genotypes based on species (A), sub-species (B), genome (C) and pictorial diagram<br />

for wild and cultivated genotypes (D)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Department of Biotechnology (Government of India)<br />

107


Milestone 2.3.6.5: Candidate gene diversity analyzed in chickpea reference set (300 accessions) for<br />

drought tolerant alleles (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, France and Peru<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CIRAD, INRA-CNG, CIP<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The candidate genes conferring drought tolerance were sequenced in 300 accessions of reference set of<br />

chickpea. The results of which are explained in Output Target 2.4.7 of <strong>Archival</strong> <strong>Report</strong> of Project 2.<br />

RK Varshney, HD Upadhyaya and PM Gaur<br />

2011 2.3.2<br />

Milestone 2.3.6.6: Diversity analyzed for the molecular markers and markers associated with drought<br />

related (root traits) in chickpea identified (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Diversity analyzed for the molecular markers and markers associated with drought related (root<br />

traits) in chickpea identified: Chickpea reference set along with 6 (ICC 4958, Annigeri, G 130,<br />

ICCV 10, KAK 2, and L 550) control cultivars were planted in cylinder culture system under a rain out<br />

shelter during two consecutive postrainy seasons (2007-08, 2008-09) The chickpea accessions were<br />

grown in 18 cm diameter, 120 cm tall PVC cylinders (Kashiwagi et al., 2005) in an alpha design with 3<br />

replications.<br />

Phenotypic evaluation of root traits: 35 days after sowing (DAS) , the shoots were harvested, the<br />

cylinders were placed horizontally and the root and the soil particles are washed, the roots are stretched<br />

to measure their length as an estimate of root depth (RDp). The root system was then sliced into<br />

portions of 30 cm (0-30cm, 30-60cm, 60-90cm, 90-120cm), to measure the root length (RL) at each of<br />

the 30 cm depth of the root system, using an image analysis system (WinRhizo, Regent Instruments<br />

INC., Canada). Root length density (RLD) in each 30cm layer was obtained by dividing root length by<br />

volume of a 30cm section of the cylinder. The root dry weight (RDW) and shoot dry weight (SDW)<br />

were recorded after drying the roots and shoots in a hot air oven at 80 o C for 72 hours. Total plant dry<br />

weight (TDW) is sum of root and shoots dry weights. Root to total plant dry weight ratio (R/T %) was<br />

calculated as an indicator for biomass allocation to roots on dry weight basis. Data was analyzed and<br />

drought related trait-specific accessions were identified as below<br />

• Shoot dry weight: Of the 42 accessions, the top ten accessions were: (ICC 15518, ICC<br />

15406, ICC 18679, ICC 20263, ICC 11903, ICC 14446, ICC 12328, ICC 18699, ICC 15435,<br />

ICC 18912 (Shoot dry weight: 2.9-2.4 gm), compared to the control cultivar with highest<br />

Shoot dry weight – ICC 4958 -2.2 gm)<br />

• Root dry weight: Of the 40 accessions, ICC 10885, ICC 12492, ICC 13187, ICC 18858, ICC<br />

20267, ICC 11819, ICC 12379, ICC 15333, ICC 18912, ICC 19011 were the top ten<br />

accessions with highest root dry weight (0.97- 0.82 gm), compared to the control cultivar with<br />

highest root dry weight in ICC 4958 (0.72 gm)<br />

• Root Depth: Of the 13 accessions, ICC 8740, ICC 11498, ICC 18983, ICC 15518, ICC 7819,<br />

ICC 10885, ICC 2679, ICC 12028, ICC 16207, ICC 13524 were the top ten accessions with<br />

highest Root Depth (131.7-119.8 cm), compared to the control cultivar Annigeri (119.5cm)<br />

108


• Root to total plant dry weight ratio (R-T): 11 accessions ICC 12492, ICC 12928, ICC<br />

11198, ICC 2629, ICC 18858, ICC 16207, ICC 15610, ICC 19226, ICC 12037, ICC 9434,<br />

ICC 1230 (39.0-30.2%) were better compared to the control cultivar with highest Root to total<br />

plant dry weight ratio % G130 (30.1%)<br />

• Root length: Of the 33 accessions, ICC 10885, ICC 20267, ICC 3410, ICC 18828, ICC<br />

15518, ICC 18679, ICC 20263, ICC 8521, ICC 3512, ICC 8318- were the top ten accessions<br />

with highest root length (6818.3-6008.4), compared to the control cultivar with highest root<br />

length ICC 4958 (5549.14)<br />

• Root length Density: 6 accessions (ICC 8261, ICC 5337, ICC 6306, ICC 18912, ICC 20267,<br />

ICC 14446 – 0.41-0.26) were better compared to the control cultivar with highest root length<br />

density ICC 4958 (0.25)<br />

Molecular diversity of Chickpea reference set<br />

Genotypic evaluation of root traits: Total genomic DNA was isolated from newly expanded leaves<br />

by using a modified CTAB method (Cuc et al, 2008), from a single representative plant in each<br />

accession of chickpea reference set in Applied Genomics Laboratory, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru. The final<br />

concentration of all the working DNA samples was normalized to 5 ng/µl for PCR reactions. The 100<br />

polymorphic markers were selected for genotyping reference set accessions, which were mapped on 12<br />

linkage groups of chickpea (Winter et al, 2000). Based on high polymorphism and amplification rate of<br />

markers, 91 SSR markers were scorable. Raw allelic data of the markers was binned through AlleloBin<br />

(Indury and Cardon, 1997).<br />

Allelic richness and diversity in reference set : A total of 91 SSR markers detected 2411 alleles in<br />

300 reference set accessions. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 3 (CaSTMS20) to 61 (TS5),<br />

with an average of 26.66 alleles per locus. The polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged<br />

from 0.021 (CaSTMS20) to 0.969 (TA176), with an average of 0.809. Most of the markers had high<br />

PIC (< 4), whereas markers TAA57 (0.166), CaSTMS13 (0.291), TA108 (0.361) and CaSTMS23<br />

(0.392) showed low polymorphism. Gene diversity is defined as the probability that two randomly<br />

chosen alleles from the population are different. It varied from 0.0203 (CaSTMS20) to 0.969 (TA176)<br />

with an average of 0.825 in the reference set.<br />

Population Structure analysis: In the present study, population structure was dissected for 300<br />

accessions by using 91SSR markers allelic data by using the software program STRUCTURE. The<br />

reference set was grouped in to 17 subpopulations with varying number of accessions. The<br />

subpopulation 1 contained 17 accessions followed by subpopulation 2 (12 accessions), subpopulation 3<br />

(16 accessions), subpopulation 4 (53 accessions), subpopulation 5 (14 accessions), subpopulation 6 (10<br />

accessions), subpopulation 7 (30 accessions), subpopulation 8 (28 accessions), subpopulation 9 (22<br />

accessions), subpopulation 10 (15 accessions), subpopulation 11 (11 accessions), subpopulation 12 (11<br />

accessions), subpopulation 13 (15 accessions), subpopulation 14 (8 accessions), subpopulation 15 (9<br />

accessions), subpopulation 16 (11 accessions) and subpopulation 17 contained 18 accessions.<br />

Association of markers with drought related traits<br />

Trait Mapping: A total of 39 significant Marker Trait Associations (MTAs) were identified for 91<br />

SSR markers in both models, mapped and unmapped. From those 39 MTAs, 11 are specific for the<br />

single trait the remaining consists of associations with seven traits. TDW was involved in the highest<br />

number of MTAs (11), followed by SDW (9), RDW (7).The fewest MTAs were associated with RV(5),<br />

RLD (3), RL (3), RDp (1), RSA (1), Considering the total number of MTAs found for these traits,<br />

TDW has by far the highest amount of trait specific associations.<br />

Mapped Markers: The 39 associated mapped markers (Table 6) are included in genetic linkage map<br />

Winter et al., (2000). Each trait was associated with at least one and maximum eleven markers on<br />

different linkage groups (LG). Eight (LG 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13) linkage groups were involved in MTAs.<br />

Of a total 39 associated markers, 16 are associated with only one trait and therefore can be called traitspecific<br />

MTAs; the others were associated with up to nine traits and further referred to as multi-trait<br />

MTAs. Excluding the Multilocus markers, the highest number of associated markers was found on LG<br />

1, followed by LG 3, with the lowest on LG 7, LG8, LG4 (only1 each). Considering the homeologous<br />

groups, LG 1 contained highest number (11) followed by LG3 (19) associated markers; the lowest<br />

number was found for LG7, LG8, LG4 (1 each). In the following, the identified MTAs are described<br />

for each trait, and cM- positions for the trait specific MTAs are given in brackets. Shoot Dry weight<br />

(SDW) shared sixteen MTAs which are specific for only this trait. They are located on LG1 (8.9), LG3<br />

109


(0.5), LG5 (1.1), LG6 (2.5), LG13 (1.5) and all MTAs were significant in two years. The three loci on<br />

three different LGs had high LD (>0.9). Total dry weight shared eleven MTAs and SDW shared nine<br />

MTAs on LG1, LG3, LG5, LG6, and LG13. A total of 27 MTAs were identified for biomass and all<br />

are trait specific and were spread on all eight LGs. RV shared a total of five MTAs. RLD shared three<br />

MTAs. Two MTAs where shared by RL. On LG3 two unique MTAs was identified for RDP, and RSA.<br />

No MTA was found for the trait R/T%. Maximum phenotypic diversity percentage (28.62%) was<br />

observed by TAA59 for RLD on LG7 followed by TA20 (20.75%), TA135 (20.01%) for TDW.<br />

N Lalitha, HD Upadhyaya, L Krishnamurthy and V Vadez<br />

110


Table 6. Representation of Marker-trait Associations of different drought related on Linkage groups of Chickpea<br />

Trait Locus<br />

Linkage<br />

group df_Marker F_Marker p_Marker<br />

p-<br />

perm_Marker<br />

p-<br />

adj_Marker df_Model df_Error MS_Error Rsq_Model sq_Marker<br />

SDW CaSTMS5 LG3 12 2.8617 0.001 0.007 0.023 28 261 0.0637 0.4771 6.88<br />

SDW GA26 LG13 15 3.0647 1.39E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 31 258 0.0619 0.4978 8.95<br />

SDW TA113 LG1 20 2.2233 0.0025 0.005 0.035 36 253 0.0632 0.4968 8.84<br />

SDW TaaSH LG5 25 2.4678 2.23E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 41 248 0.0607 0.5262 11.79<br />

SDW TR40 LG6 24 2.1912 0.0015 0.005 0.017 40 249 0.0624 0.5115 10.32<br />

SDW GAA40 LG1 8 3.0621 0.0026 0.004 0.023 24 265 0.1004 0.3546 5.97<br />

SDW CaSTMS9 LG6 9 3.2785 8.38E-04 0.002 9.99E-04 25 264 0.0751 0.3861 6.86<br />

SDW TA20 LG1 42 2.1951 1.27E-04 0.004 9.99E-04 58 231 0.0682 0.5122 19.47<br />

SDW TS24 LG6 28 2.1546 0.0011 0.005 0.015 44 245 0.0722 0.4523 13.49<br />

RDW CaSTMS5 LG3 12 2.7537 0.0015 0.003 0.011 28 261 0.0086 0.3853 7.78<br />

RDW TA20 LG1 42 2.1174 2.50E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 58 231 0.0079 0.5 19.25<br />

RDW TA25 LG8 40 1.86 0.0025 0.006 0.039 56 233 0.0083 0.4751 16.76<br />

RDW TaaSH LG5 25 2.4046 3.36E-04 0.002 9.99E-04 41 248 0.0082 0.4426 13.51<br />

RDW GA26 LG13 15 2.3296 0.0039 0.003 0.022 31 258 0.0095 0.3324 9.04<br />

RDW GAA40 LG1 8 3.165 0.0019 0.002 0.007 24 265 0.0096 0.3081 6.61<br />

RDW TR24 LG3 31 2.1373 7.87E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 47 242 0.009 0.4049 16.29<br />

RDp TA135 LG3 30 2.2221 4.95E-04 0.002 9.99E-04 46 243 71.1432 0.2706 20.01<br />

TDW CaSTMS5 LG3 12 3.1847 2.86E-04 0.003 9.99E-04 28 261 0.1012 0.4828 7.57<br />

TDW GA26 LG13 15 2.9049 2.92E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 31 258 0.1005 0.4927 8.57<br />

TDW TA5 LG3 24 2.1512 0.0019 0.004 0.015 40 249 0.1008 0.5089 10.18<br />

TDW TA113 LG1 20 2.3748 0.0011 0.004 0.013 36 253 0.1008 0.5008 9.37<br />

TDW CaSTMS7 LG5 5 3.5513 0.004 0.005 0.045 21 268 0.1493 0.3467 4.33<br />

TDW GAA40 LG1 8 3.5276 6.75E-04 0.004 9.99E-04 24 265 0.1455 0.3704 6.7<br />

TDW TaaSH LG5 25 2.2265 0.001 0.005 0.015 41 248 0.1405 0.4311 12.77<br />

TDW CaSTMS9 LG6 9 3.0909 0.0015 9.99E-04 0.009 25 264 0.133 0.3814 6.52<br />

TDW CaSTMS21 LG1 11 2.5389 0.0046 0.003 0.049 27 262 0.1338 0.382 6.59<br />

TDW TA20 LG1 42 2.3964 2.10E-05 0.002 9.99E-04 58 231 0.117 0.5237 20.75<br />

TDW TS24 LG6 28 2.2322 6.24E-04 0.006 9.99E-04 44 245 0.1262 0.4552 13.9<br />

111


RL TA5 LG3 24 2.3773 4.84E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 40 249 405034.1 0.2882 16.31<br />

RL CaSTMS5 LG3 12 2.78 0.0014 9.99E-04 0.008 28 261 607890.7 0.1944 10.3<br />

RLD TA14 LG6 27 2.2292 7.44E-04 0.035 9.99E-04 43 246 5.90E-04 0.3692 15.43<br />

RLD) TA130 LG4 23 3.3634 1.16E-06 0.026 9.99E-04 39 250 5.52E-04 0.4004 18.55<br />

RLD TAA59 LG7 28 5.0201 8.48E-13 0.002 9.99E-04 44 245 4.69E-04 0.5011 28.62<br />

RV TA20 LG1 42 1.9134 0.0014 0.005 0.016 58 231 3.7971 0.4467 19.25<br />

RV TA22 LG3 42 1.9116 0.0014 0.004 0.014 58 231 3.798 0.4466 19.24<br />

RV TaaSH LG5 25 2.0933 0.0024 0.007 0.047 41 248 3.9365 0.3841 13<br />

RV TS43 LG5 37 1.9311 0.0019 0.003 0.012 53 236 3.8454 0.4275 17.33<br />

RV GAA40 LG1 8 3.3366 0.0012 0.004 0.01 24 265 5.2442 0.2194 7.86<br />

RSA CaSTMS5 LG3 12 2.9023 8.66E-04 9.99E-04 9.99E-04 28 261 20436.21 0.3021 9.31<br />

SDW=Shoot Dry Weight, RDW=Root Dry Weight (RDW), TDW=Total Plant Dry Weight, RDp=Root Depth, RL=Root Length, RLD=Root Length Density,<br />

RSA=Root surface area, RV=Root Volume.<br />

112


Output target 2.3.7: Germplasm sets evaluated for utilization in Africa (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Characterize core collection of finger millet and identify materials for regional evaluation<br />

Milestone 2.3.7.1: Promising and adaptable materials identified and distributed and evaluated in regional<br />

finger millet trials in the ESA (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

KARI-Kenya<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

A subset of 150-200 characterized finger millet accessions drawn from the 540 finger millet core<br />

collection that express variability in morphological traits and blast reaction composed and initial<br />

evaluation conducted in one site in Kenya: 158 finger millet accessions collected from 21 Kenyan<br />

districts (Baringo, Busia, Elgeyo Marakwet, Embu, Homa Bay, Kakamega, Keiyo Marakwet, Kisii, Kuria,<br />

Laikipia, Machakos, Makueni, Meru, Nakuru, Nyamira, Samburu, Siaya, South Nyanza, Tharaka Nithi,<br />

Uasin Gishu and West Pokot districts) were characterized at Kiboko during <strong>2010</strong> long rains (LR) season.<br />

Quantitative data from Kiboko were subjected to ANOVA and fourteen traits (Days after flowering, finger<br />

width, finger length, flag leaf sheath length, flag leaf sheath width, leaf sheath length, leaf blade length, leaf<br />

blade width, number of fingers, number of leaves, number of productive tillers, peduncle length, panicle<br />

exsertion and plant height) showed significant differences at p=0.05. The earliest genotypes to flower were<br />

collections from Machakos district and the late flowering was from Baringo district with GBK-011111A<br />

flowering at 62 days after sowing and GBK-040467A flowering at 100 days, with a trial mean of 79 days.<br />

Average finger width was 1.045 cm with the widest and narrowest finger recorded in GBK-029767A (2.16<br />

cm) and GBK-043213A (0.65 cm) respectively. Mean finger length was 6.887 cm with a range of 3.75-12<br />

cm long in GBK-011118A (Machakos) and GBK-000375A (Kisii) respectively. Means and ranges of some<br />

important quantitative traits that had high significant differences recorded between the different accessions<br />

in the study included: Number of fingers (Mean=7, Range=6 – 10 fingers), Number of leaves (Mean= 13,<br />

Range=8-20), Number of productive tillers (mean=5 per plant, Range= 1-21 tillers per plant), Peduncle<br />

length (Mean= 26.14 cm, Range=18- 33.2 cm), Panicle exsertion (Mean= 15.14 cm, Range=7.6 – 26.8 cm)<br />

and plant height(Mean=101.9 cm , Range=44.4 - 146.4cm). The post harvest data is being finalized for<br />

analysis.<br />

Special project funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

Mary Mgonja , Henry Ojulong, E Manyasa P Sheunda, and J Kibuka<br />

Activity: Characterize a sorghum core collection from five African Bio-fortified Sorghum target for<br />

diversity in micro nutritional traits<br />

Milestone: African accessions of pearl millet reference collection characterized in West Africa (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Nigeria, Niger, Mali<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

LCRI, IER, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger<br />

113


Progress/Results:<br />

This Trust-funded project has been successfully completed with a final report which was appreciated by the<br />

donor; the respective manuscript preparation is in final stages (abstract copied below); data have been<br />

shared with the Trust and with Trushar Shah (<strong>ICRISAT</strong> database manager) for inclusion in a data base.<br />

Abstract. To promote utilization of West and Central African (WCA) genetic resources of pearl millet<br />

[Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], and to enhance linkages between the Generation Challenge Program<br />

(GCP) and WCA pearl millet breeding programs, the present project aimed at agro-morphological<br />

characterization of selected accessions from the GCP pearl millet reference collection. A total of 81<br />

accessions from the collection were successfully multiplied via manual “sibbing” at Sadore (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-<br />

Niger) during the off-seasons 2008/2009 and February 2009. The 81 accessions comprised 78 cultivated<br />

landraces and three improved cultivars. The 78 landraces originated from 13 countries, namely Benin (1<br />

accession), Burkina Faso (8), Cameroon (6), Central Africa (1), Ghana (4), Mali (9), Mauritania (1), Niger<br />

(15), Nigeria (14), Senegal (1), South Africa (3), Sudan (10), and Togo (5). The three improved cultivars<br />

originated from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger (2) and from a joint <strong>ICRISAT</strong> / “Institut d’Economie Rurale” (IER, Mali)<br />

breeding program (1). In cooperation with Lake Chad Research Institute (LCRI, Nigeria) and IER, 74 of<br />

the 81 accessions (depending on available seed quantity) were characterized together with 7 controls in the<br />

rainy season 2009 in field trials under low- and high-input conditions at Sadore (Niger), Maiduguri<br />

(Nigeria) and Cinzana (Mali). All 81 accessions were evaluated together with 18 controls for resistance to<br />

the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. in an artificially infested field at Sadore (Niger). The<br />

tested accessions revealed a wide range of genetic diversity for various traits. Several accessions were<br />

identified as sources for desired traits such as long awns, compact and dense panicles; grain color;<br />

earliness, tolerance to Striga, and wide adaptation. These accessions are being integrated in <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s and<br />

partner NARS’ breeding programs. The project thus has successfully contributed to use of genetic<br />

resources in the diversification of pearl millet breeding programs in Niger, Mali and Nigeria. Seed of all<br />

accessions and characterization data are available with <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Global Crop Diversity Trust<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Activity: Evaluate groundnut mini core collection/wild species in ESA<br />

Milestone 2.3.7.3: Wild Arachis evaluated for target traits (GRD, ELS, aflatoxin resistance) at hotspot<br />

locations in ESA (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from ESM<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.3.7.4: Gene introgression carried out for foliar and viral disease resistance from wild Arachis<br />

germplasm into cultivated varieties (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from ESM<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

114


Output 2.4: Genetic diversity and population structure of staple crops and small millets assessed and<br />

mapping populations, RILs developed and DNA extracts assembled, conserved and distributed and<br />

new knowledge shared with partners<br />

Output target 2.4.1 Genetic diversity and population structure of staple crops assessed (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Genotype composite collections for studying diversity and population structure<br />

Milestone 2.4.1.2: Diversity assessment of sorghum published (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, France and China<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, CIRAD-France and CASS-China<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Efficiency of breeding mainly depends on the diversity of the parents selected for crossing. Evaluation and<br />

characterization are essential for efficient exploitation of available germplasm resources. However,<br />

selection of diverse parents based on agro-morphological variation may not be effective due to dependence<br />

of these characters on environmental conditions. Molecular characterization provides thus an environmentindependent<br />

alternative. We present here a first comprehensive study of the genetic diversity of a large<br />

composite collection of sorghum germplasm (3367 accessions), including landraces as well as breeding<br />

material, and covering all worldwide origins and racial characterizations. 41 SSR markers, regularly<br />

covering the Sorghum genome, exhibited 789 alleles, with an average of 19.2 alleles per marker. Genetic<br />

diversity sensu largo is organized according to racial classification within geographic origin. The largest<br />

numbers of alleles were detected among accessions from Africa (Table 7). This confirms the domestication<br />

region of sorghum, reinforced by the largest morphological diversity of cross-compatible wild and<br />

cultivated sorghum. Race bicolor was scattered across all clusters suggesting that it is the most<br />

heterogeneous (as expected of the original domesticate), whereas the remaining accessions were largely<br />

clustered according to their race in a given geographic origin. Concentration of most kafir accessions in a<br />

single South African cluster confirms that this is the most homogeneous among the five basic races. West<br />

African accessions of the margaritiferum sub-group within race guinea (Gma) clustered closely with wild<br />

accessions, suggesting they arise from an independent domestication event. Our study highlights new<br />

findings considering domestication origin of sorghum in Africa. The reference set can serve as an entry<br />

point to global sorghum germplasm collections and may prove useful for further allele mining.<br />

Special project funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Program<br />

P Ramu, C Billot, J-F Rami, S Bouchet, R Rivallan,<br />

L Gardes, M Deu, J Chantereau, Y Li, T Wang,<br />

P Lu, RT Folkertsma, HD Upadhyaya and CT Hash<br />

Table 7. Number of accessions and alleles in different biological groups, races, and geographic races<br />

of sorghum reference set<br />

Accession status, race or passport origin<br />

Number of accessions<br />

(% of total)<br />

Number of alleles<br />

(% of total)<br />

Status<br />

Wild or weedy 68 ( 2.0%) 509 (64.5%)<br />

Landrace 3013 (89.5%) 740 (93.8%)<br />

Breeding lines or advanced cultivars 280 ( 8.3%) 446 (56.5%)<br />

115


Number of accessions Number of alleles<br />

Accession status, race or passport origin<br />

(% of total)<br />

(% of total)<br />

Unknown 6 ( 0.1%) 164 (20.8%)<br />

Race<br />

Bicolor 195 ( 5.8%) 485 (61.5%)<br />

Caudatum 577 (17.2%) 541 (68.6%)<br />

Durra 651 (19.4%) 523 (66.3%)<br />

Guinea 365 (10.8%) 470 (59.6%)<br />

Kafir 239 ( 7.1%) 327 (41.4%)<br />

Intermediate 1159 (34.4%) 632 (80.1%)<br />

Unknown 115 ( 3.3%) 378 (47.9%)<br />

Passport origin<br />

Africa 1926 (57.3%) 689 (87.3%)<br />

Central Africa 224 ( 6.6%) 446 (56.5%)<br />

Eastern Africa 570 (16.9%) 578 (73.3%)<br />

Southern Africa 735 (21.8%) 511 (64.8%)<br />

Western Africa 397 (11.8%) 522 (66.2%)<br />

Asia 1010 (30.1%) 600 (76.0%)<br />

Eastern Asia 441 (13.1%) 443 (56.1%)<br />

Indian subcontinent 449 (13.3%) 460 (58.3%)<br />

Middle East 120 ( 3.6%) 401 (50.8%)<br />

North America 227 ( 6.7%) 526 (66.7%)<br />

Latin America 21 ( 0.6%) 201 (25.5%)<br />

Unknown 138 ( 4.0%) 343 (43.4%)<br />

Other 45 ( 1.3%) 329 (41.7%)<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2.4.2<br />

Milestone 2.4.1.5: Datasets for groundnut and pigeonpea composite collections genotyping made available<br />

globally via the internet (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Databases of groundnut and pigeonpea composite collections were uploaded to GCP site and made<br />

available globally via the internet.<br />

HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone 2.4.1.6: Diversity and population structure of pearl millet composite collection analysed and<br />

reference set (300 accessions) established (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

116


Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) is the sixth most important cereal, and is the main food source in the poorest regions<br />

of India and the African continent. It is endowed with enormous genetic variability for various morphological traits, yield<br />

components, adaptation and quality traits, and highly tolerant to heat and drought, saline and acid soils. To enhance the utilization<br />

of germplasm in crop improvement programs, a composite collection of pearl millet, consisting of 1021 germplasm accessions,<br />

has been developed from the world collection of 21,594 pearl millet germplasm held at Patancheru-based <strong>ICRISAT</strong> genebank in<br />

India. This composite collection was genotyped using 19 SSR loci spread across seven linkage groups of pearl millet to study<br />

genetic diversity and population structure and from it select a reference set of 300 most diverse accessions. The composite<br />

collection accessions were highly heterogeneous and up to 8 alleles were detected per locus. A total of 230 alleles were detected,<br />

of which, 102 were rare alleles (1%). Only seven alleles were unique in wild species whereas 30 in landraces (Table 8). The<br />

clustering pattern indicated that the accessions were largely grouped geographically but not by biological status. The released<br />

cultivars and breeding materials were scattered across different clusters. A reference set of 300 accessions was chosen using ‘Max<br />

length sub tree’ option of DARwin 5.0 based on Euclidean distance matrix derived from allele frequency values. The reference<br />

set has captured 94.8 per cent of the composite collection alleles (230). This reference set will be profiled with additional markers<br />

and extensively phenotyped for traits of economic importance to identify accessions with beneficial traits for utilization in pearl<br />

millet breeding and genomics.<br />

Special project funding: Generation Challenge Program<br />

HD Upadhyaya, CT Hash, RK Varshney,<br />

S Senthilvel, CLL Gowda, A Rathore and T Shah<br />

Table 8. Allelic richness in wild relatives and landraces of pearl millet composite collection<br />

Wild relatives<br />

Landraces<br />

Size<br />

range<br />

(bp)<br />

Major<br />

Allele<br />

(bp)<br />

Major<br />

Allele<br />

(%) Allele<br />

Size<br />

range<br />

(bp)<br />

Major<br />

Allele<br />

(bp)<br />

Major<br />

Allele<br />

(%)<br />

SSR Loci Allele<br />

Xpsmp2030 12 101-133 113 55 19 101-137 113 54<br />

Xpsmp2043 13 156-198 190 20 14 158-196 180 24<br />

Xpsmp2076 7 146-166 148 30 16 140-170 160 51<br />

Xpsmp2085 8 163-177 169 32 12 163-195 169 42<br />

Xpsmp2090 8 169-185 177 28 14 167-199 177 35<br />

Xpsmp2201 5 332-364 364 84 9 332-370 364 50<br />

Xpsmp2203 12 334-360 334 28 21 328-368 334 27<br />

Xpsmp2208 5 244-252 246 63 7 244-262 246 65<br />

Xpsmp2227 7 189-211 197 74 8 189-211 197 56<br />

Xpsmp2231 14 223-249 225 41 17 201-249 245 24<br />

Xpsmp2233 7 252-264 256 50 9 252-268 256 40<br />

Xpsmp2237 10 210-258 230 27 17 208-272 230 29<br />

Xpsmp2246 6 258-288 262 39 4 258-264 258 36<br />

Xpsmp2248 11 150-172 162 36 12 142-172 166 37<br />

Xpsmp2249 2 152-154 154 60 4 152-160 154 60<br />

Xpsmp2275 6 264-285 273 47 9 261-285 273 40<br />

Xicmp3017 7 181-211 193 31 12 175-211 193 43<br />

Xicmp3038 3 194-200 197 69 5 191-203 197 62<br />

Xicmp3048 2 244-248 244 81 5 236-250 244 77<br />

117


Milestone 2.4.1.7: Diversity assessment of pearl millet published (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Preparation of manuscript is in under preparation<br />

Special project funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Program<br />

HD Upadhyaya, CT Hash, RK Varshney,<br />

S Senthilvel, CLL Gowda, A Rathore and T Shah<br />

Milestone 2.4.1.8: Data sets for pearl millet, finger millet, and foxtail millet composite sets made available<br />

globally via Internet (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

• Pearl millet data templates consisting of 19399 (1021 accessions x 19 SSRs) SSR marker data<br />

points generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via<br />

internet<br />

• Finger millet data templates consisting of 19399 (1021 accessions x 19 SSRs) data points<br />

generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via internet<br />

• Foxtail millet data templates consisting of 9500 (500 accessions x 19 SSRs) SSR marker data<br />

points generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via<br />

internet<br />

Special project funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Program<br />

HD Upadhyaya, CT Hash, RK Varshney,<br />

S Senthilvel, CLL Gowda, A Rathore and T Shah<br />

Milestone 2.4.1.9: The diversity of the sources of resistance to the groundnut rosette virus in groundnut<br />

assessed and documented (2009)<br />

Progress reported - 75%<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from ESM<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

118


Progress/Results:<br />

Output target 2.4.2: Reference sets of small millets germplasm established (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Establish reference sets of small millets<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2.4.3<br />

Milestone 2.4.2.2: Genetic diversity and population structure of foxtail millet composite collection assessed<br />

and reference set (200 accessions) established (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L). P. Beauv.), once a major food crop in early agriculture of Eurasia, is now<br />

a minor cereal, reduced to a relic crop in many parts of the world. The information about the usefulness of<br />

foxtail millet germplasm in breeding is not available. Using passport and characterization data on entire<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> foxtail millet germplasm collection, a composite collection (500 accessions) was developed. This<br />

composite collection was genotyped using 19 SSRs in high throughput assay to detect genetic structure and<br />

diversity and from it extract genetically most diverse accessions to construct a reference set. Allelic data of<br />

19 SSR loci on 452 accessions detected 362 alleles, of which, 196 were common and 166 rare alleles<br />

(Table 9). Gene diversity varied from 0.012 to 0.670. A number of group-specific unique alleles were<br />

detected: 40 in Indica, 21 in Moharia, 10 in Pumila, and eight in Maxima among races, while among<br />

regions, 57 in South Asia, 17 in West Asia, 14 in East Asia, and three in Africa. The shared common alleles<br />

were 28 between Moharia and Indica, 16 between Maxima and Indica, nine between Maxima and Moharia,<br />

four between Moharia and Pumila, three each between Italica and Indica and Pumila and Indica. Regionwise<br />

shared common alleles were 43 between East Asia and South Asia, 24 between South Asia and West<br />

Asia, 4 between Africa and South Asia, three each between East Asia and West Asia and Africa and West<br />

Asia, and two between Africa and East Asia. A reference set of 200 genetically most diverse accessions<br />

was established, capturing 316 (87.3%) of the 362 alleles detected in the composite collection. This<br />

reference set would be useful in foxtail millet breeding and genomics.<br />

Table 9. Allelic composition, polymorphic information content (PIC), gene diversity, and<br />

heterozygosity in composite collection (19 SSR loci data on 452 accessions) of foxtail millet<br />

Marker Range Allele no<br />

Common<br />

alleles<br />

Rare<br />

alleles<br />

Heterozygo<br />

sity PIC Gene diversity<br />

P2 108- 130 10 7 3 0.183 0.582 0.624<br />

P13 150- 194 14 11 3 0.086 0.832 0.848<br />

P5 277- 310 10 8 2 0.135 0.544 0.564<br />

UGEP8 292- 300 5 4 0 0.012 0.114 0.115<br />

UGEP53 176- 284 35 18 17 0.407 0.907 0.913<br />

UGEP81 110- 236 30 9 21 0.122 0.712 0.745<br />

UGEP102 176- 206 11 7 4 0.155 0.603 0.639<br />

UGEP3 166- 208 22 15 7 0.311 0.754 0.765<br />

UGEP15 150- 238 31 23 8 0.239 0.919 0.923<br />

UGEP56 120- 174 24 9 15 0.219 0.521 0.542<br />

UGEP90 163- 269 28 13 15 0.086 0.635 0.650<br />

ICMMO2C24 316- 398 30 7 24 0.239 0.684 0.724<br />

119


ICMMO2D15B 132- 166 16 10 6 0.157 0.296 0.306<br />

ICMMO2D07 226- 256 11 9 2 0.635 0.791 0.814<br />

UGEP11 146- 176 13 7 6 0.115 0.257 0.264<br />

UGEP12 210- 248 19 8 11 0.291 0.849 0.864<br />

UGEP77 227- 291 33 20 13 0.670 0.853 0.863<br />

UGEP26 207- 240 12 8 4 0.125 0.334 0.340<br />

ICMMO2C05 184- 208 8 3 5 0.012 0.145 0.149<br />

Total - 362 196 166 - - -<br />

Mean - 19.1 10.3 8.7 0.221 0.596 0.6137<br />

Min - 5 3 0 0.012 0.114 0.115<br />

Max - 35 23 24 0.670 0.919 0.923<br />

Special project funding: Generation Challenge Program<br />

HD Upadhyaya, CT Hash, RK Varshney, S Senthilvel, CLL Gowda, A Rathore and T Shah<br />

2011 2.4.1<br />

Milestone 2.4.2.3: 2009 2.4.1 Datasets of composite collections of finger millet and foxtail millet<br />

genotyping made available globally via the internet (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Pearl millet data templates consisting of 19399 (1021 accessions x 19 SSRs) SSR marker data points<br />

generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via internet<br />

• Finger millet data templates consisting of 19399 (1021 accessions x 19 SSRs) data points<br />

generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via internet<br />

• Foxtail millet data templates consisting of 9500 (500 accessions x 19 SSRs) SSR marker data points generated at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> delivered to GCP Central Registry and made available globally via internet<br />

Special project funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Program<br />

HD Upadhyaya, CT Hash, RK Varshney,<br />

S Senthilvel, CLL Gowda, A Rathore and T Shah<br />

Output target 2.4.4: Germplasm reference sets available for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Ensure availability of reference collections of staple crops and small millets to partners<br />

Milestone 2.4.4.2: Germplasm accessions of pigeonpea and sorghum reference sets regenerated for<br />

distribution to partners on request (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

120


Progress/Results:<br />

Reference sets of sorghum (384 accessions) and pigeonpea (300 accessions) were regenerated and the seed<br />

is available for distribution to partners on request<br />

HD Upadhyaya, RP Thakur, R Sharma, CLL Gowda and NBPGR<br />

Output target 2.4.5: DNA extracts of mini core collections and reference sets of germplasm conserved<br />

for utilization (2011)<br />

Activity: Conserve DNA extracts of sub sets of germplasm for utilization<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2.4.1<br />

Milestones: 2.4.5.1: DNA extracts of chickpea and groundnut mini core collections of germplasm<br />

conserved for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

DNA of chickpea (211 accessions) and groundnut (184 accessions) mini core collections was extracted and<br />

conserved for utilization<br />

HD Upadhyaya, RK Varshney and CLL Gowda<br />

Milestones: 2.4.5.2: DNA of pigeonpea, groundnut, and sorghum mini core collections and reference set<br />

extracted and made available on request (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

DNA of chickpea (300 accessions) and groundnut (300 accessions) reference set was extracted and<br />

conserved for utilization. Reference sets of pigeonpea (300 accessions) and sorghum (384 accessions) were<br />

planted in field to extract the DNA for conservation and utilization.<br />

HD Upadhyaya, RK Varshney, CT Hash,<br />

CLL Gowda and KB Saxena<br />

Milestones: 2.4.5.3: DNA of finger millet mini core collections and reference set extracted and made<br />

available on request (2012)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

121


Progress/Results:<br />

DNA of finger millet mini core collection and reference set was extracted and is available on request<br />

HD Upadhyaya, RK Varshney, CT Hash and CLL Gowda<br />

Output target 2.4.6: Broadening the genetic base of legumes through wide crosses (2011)<br />

Activity: Broadening the genetic base of groundnut by creating tetraploid groundnut using wild Arachis,<br />

synthetic amphidiploids and/or other diverse germplasm<br />

Milestone 2.4.6.1: Diploid hybrids between Arachis AA and BB genome generated and reference map of<br />

AA and BB genome constructed (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

No report for <strong>2010</strong><br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.6.2: Hybrids between cultivated groundnut and synthetic amphidiploids created, variation<br />

for different traits (Rosette and foliar diseases) analyzed and molecular map constructed (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Already reported in milestone 2.4.6.4.Will provide a detailed report in 2011<br />

Milestone 2.4.6.3: Develop hybrids between section Arachis and section Procumbentes and generate fertile<br />

backcross population and screen for desirable traits (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

To broaden the narrow genetic base of cultivated groundnut, and introduce useful traits, A. chiquitana from section Procumbentes<br />

was crossed with cultivated groundnut. The initial generation crosses were developed by hormone aided pollinations and rescuing<br />

the hybrid embryos in vitro. First few backcrosses were required as selfing was not possible. From BC 3 it was possible to obtain<br />

progenies from self pollinations. BC 3 F 4 material from the cross A. hypogaea x A. chiquitana were screened for aflatoxin<br />

production by growing the plants in pots. They were subjected to A. flavus by drenching the pots with the inoculum. Plants were<br />

harvested and pods collected and the seeds were screened for aflatoxin contamination by ELISA technique. Interestingly none of<br />

the seeds had any trace of aflatoxin. The screening will be repeated again in 2011, under field conditions, to confirm resistance.<br />

Our results have shown that it is possible to introgress A. flavus resistance and low aflatoxin production from A. chiquitana.<br />

However, we are confirming these results.<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, Harikishan Sudini and HD Upadhyaya<br />

122


Milestone 2.4.6.4: Tetraploid hybrids between synthetic and cultivated groundnut generated and molecular<br />

map generated for use in breeding program (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

There is ample evidence that groundnut has a narrow genetic base. In order to broaden the genetic base and<br />

introgress disease and pest resistance traits from wild Arachis species (diploid) to the amphidiploid and<br />

autotetraploid groundnut, synthetic tertaploids were produced at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and used in the crossing<br />

program with cultivated groundnut. Hybridization between selected tetraploid groundnuts was carried and<br />

BC 1 material generated. Amongst the five crosses reported in 2009 archival report, three crosses (utilizing<br />

ISATGR 1212, ISATGR 265-5 and ISATGR 278-18) were advanced further to develop F 1 BC 2 population.<br />

The selection was based on the cytological analysis of the F 1 hybrids (Figure 7) as well as seed set.<br />

Cytological analysis showed maximum recombination, high pollen fertility and good seed set. As BC 2<br />

generation is critical to develop ABQTL population, the experiment to obtain maximum number of<br />

pods/seeds from this generation is in progress. In <strong>2010</strong> experiments, a good recombination between<br />

cultivated groundnut and new sources of tetraploid groundnut generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> was observed and it is<br />

important in base broadening efforts.<br />

First row A. hypogaea x ISATGR 1212: leftmetaphase;<br />

center-anaphase; right-tetrads.<br />

Second row A. hypogaea x ISATGR 278-18: Leftmetaphase;<br />

center-anaphase; right-tetrads<br />

Third row A. hypogaea x ISATGR 265-5A: leftmetaphase;<br />

center-anaphase; right-tetrads.<br />

Figure 7. Meiosis in F1 hybrids<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, Rajeev Varshney and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Activity: Broaden the genetic base of pigeonpea using Cajanus platycarpus, a tertiary gene pool species<br />

of Cajanus<br />

Milestone 2.4.6.5: Generate variation for desirable characters using Cajanus platycarpus (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Cajanus platycarpus, a wild relative in the tertiary gene pool of pigeonpea, is known to have many<br />

desirable traits necessary for the improvement of cultigen. Advance generation lines are now available at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Screening experiments were conducted in <strong>2010</strong> to confirm the presence of disease and pest<br />

resistance as well as the presence of some novel traits. Advance generation stable lines were screened for a<br />

range of traits including resistance to pod borer, pod fly, bruchids, SMD and FW under unprotected field<br />

conditions. Advance generation stable C. platycarpus derivatives, which morphologically resembled<br />

123


cultivated pigeonpea, were screened for a range of desirable traits under <strong>ICRISAT</strong> field conditions. A<br />

sample of the data is presented in the figure 8 shown below. Lines continued to show low damage due to<br />

insects H. armigera, pod fly and bruchids. In some lines multiple insect resistance was observed (Figure 8<br />

line 3, 10, 11 and 12). Lab based bioassay with a few selected lines for bruchid resistance showed low<br />

oviposition (Figure 9 and antibiosis mechanism of resistance with malformed adults. SMD and FW<br />

resistance was observed in some lines. Selected lines were screened for water logging and resistant lines<br />

showed growth under water logged conditions and the formation of lenticels as the resistance mechanism<br />

(Figure 10). A few lines were screened for salinity tolerance and the resistant lines showed normal growth,<br />

formed normal number of pods when grown on soil supplemented with 30 mM NACL. Some of the lines<br />

showed distinctive features such as dwarf growth habit and white seed color. <strong>2010</strong> screening experiments<br />

have further confirmed the presence of insect and disease resistance, as well as the presence of some unique<br />

morphological traits.<br />

Fig. Low insect damage in C. platycarpus lines<br />

35<br />

30<br />

Pod damage ( %)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Heliothis<br />

Pod f ly<br />

Bruchid<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13<br />

Platycarpus lines- controls are show n in the 13th line<br />

Figure 8 showing Insect resistance in C. platycarpus derived lines under <strong>ICRISAT</strong> unprotected field<br />

conditions<br />

120<br />

100<br />

(%) Eggs laid<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

ICPW-66<br />

ICPW-64<br />

A4-10-7-1<br />

A4-10-7-2<br />

A4-10-7-4<br />

A4-10-7-7<br />

A4-10-7-19<br />

A4-10-7-20<br />

Cont. ICP-85010 *<br />

Figure 9. Oviposition by female bruchid on C.platycarpus and its derivatives<br />

124


Figure 10. Formation of lenticels in water logged plants.<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, KB Saxena, L Krishnamurthy,<br />

HC Sharma, RK Varshney, R Sultana,<br />

GVR Rao, S Pande and M Sharma<br />

Output target 2.4.7: Allele specific sequence diversity in the reference sets staple crops studied (2011)<br />

Activity: Study allele specific sequence diversity in the reference sets of staple crops<br />

Milestone 2.4.7.1: Allele specific sequence diversity in the reference set of chickpea studied (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, France and Peru<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CIRAD, INRA-CNG and CIP<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

In continuation of the work conducted in 2009, sequencing of 288 genotypes was completed for chickpea<br />

apetala2 (CAP2-which is the homolog of DREB2A), abscisic acid stress and ripening hormone (ASR),<br />

sucrose synthase (SuSy), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) and ERECTA genes. The sequence diversity<br />

analyses showed that the CAP2 gene was highly conserved across the reference collection with no SNPs,<br />

while CAP2 promoter had only one SNP. In case of ASR gene, 34 SNPs were found while, the SPS gene<br />

had 3 SNPs. ERECTA gene fragment (7f-5r) had 13 SNPs, while 20 SNPs were found in case of ERECTA<br />

(8f-8r) fragment. Nucleotide diversity was highest in case of ERECTA gene fragments (0.0029), followed<br />

by ASR (0.0014) and SPS (0.0011). Four haplotypes were derived for candidate genes ASR, ERECTA (7f-<br />

5r) and SPS genes, while three haplotypes were recognized in case of ERECTA (8f-8r) gene fragment and<br />

only two haplotypes were found in case CAP2 promoter. The candidate gene sequencing based association<br />

genetics approach on reference collection of chickpea showed that association of two genes with drought<br />

tolerance traits. The gene “ASR” was found to be associated with shoot dry weight with 12% phenotypic<br />

variation and “CAP2 promoter” was found to be associated with shoot dry weight and root dry weight<br />

phenotypic variation 19.21% and 13.48% respectively.<br />

RK Varshney, SN Nayak, HD Upadhyaya, D This, D Hoisington<br />

Milestone 4.7.1.2: Allele specific sequence diversity in the reference set of sorghum studied (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited CTH<br />

125


Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Output target 2.4.8: Development of genomic resources for SAT crops (2011)<br />

Activity: Development of molecular markers<br />

Milestone 2.4.8.1: Novel set of microsatellite markers developed and characterized for chickpea,<br />

pigeonpea and groundnut (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Germany and USA<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

JCVI, NCGR, UC-Davis and Uni. of Frankfurt<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Chickpea: Apart from SSR markers developed from SSR-enriched libraries (Nayak et al. <strong>2010</strong>, Theor<br />

Appl Genet 120: 1415-1441), BAC-end sequences (MS, under preparation) and EST sequences<br />

(Varshney et al. 2009, BMC Genomics 10:523), transcript assembly (CcTA) developed after using both<br />

Sanger ESTs and 454/FLX sequences reads were analyzed for developing SSR markers. On mining a total<br />

of 103,215 tentative unique sequences (TUSs) of CcTA, 26,252 SSRs were identified. Primer3 was used<br />

for designing primer pairs for the sequences containing SSRs. As a result, a total of 750 primer pairs were<br />

designed. However, after excluding mononucleotide and imperfect compound SSRs, primer pairs were<br />

synthesized for 80 SSRs. On screening these 80 novel SSR markers on five genotypes (ICC 4958, ICC<br />

1882, ICC 283, ICC 8261 and PI 489777), 71 were found functional. These results are part of the MS that<br />

describes the results of 454/FLX sequencing.<br />

In addition to above, based on allele re-sequencing and comparative genomics approach, additional set of<br />

genic molecular markers have been developed via identification of SNPs and their conversion into CAPS<br />

assay as well as intron spanning region (ISR) markers . For SNP discovery through allele re-sequencing,<br />

primer pairs were designed for 688 genes/ expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of chickpea and 657 genes/ESTs<br />

of heterologous (closely related to chickpea) species. High-quality sequence data obtained for 220 genes on<br />

2-20 genotypes representing 9 Cicer species provided 1,893 SNPs with an average frequency of 1/35.83 bp<br />

and 0.34 PIC value. On an average 2.9 haplotypes were present in 220 genes with an average haplotype<br />

diversity of 0.6326. SNP2CAPS analysis of 220 sequence alignments, as mentioned above, provided a total<br />

of 192 CAPS candidates. Experimental analysis of these 192 CAPS candidates together with 87 CAPS<br />

candidates identified earlier through in silico mining of ESTs provided scorable amplification in 173<br />

(62.01%) cases of which predicted assays were validated in 143 (82.66%) cases (CGMM). Alignments of<br />

chickpea unigenes with Medicago truncatula genome were used to develop 121 ISR markers of which 87<br />

yielded scorable products. In addition, optimization of 77 EST-derived SSR (ICCeM) markers provided 51<br />

scorable markers. These results have been included in a MS that has been communicated for publication in<br />

Theoretical and Applied Genetics (Gujaria et al. 2011).<br />

RK Varshney, PJ Hiremath, Ashish Kumar, Neha Gujaria<br />

Groundnut: In continuation to the earlier report on development of SSRs from BAC end sequences in<br />

collaboration with University of California, Davis (Doug Cook), out of the 4,869 SSRs identified, primer<br />

pairs were designed and synthesized for a total of 1,152 SSRs. All these primer pairs were used to screen<br />

parents of 12 mapping populations. As a result, 692 primer pairs provided scorable amplification and 184<br />

markers showed polymorphism across 16 genotypes. A total of 686 alleles were detected at 184 marker loci<br />

126


with an average of 3.7 alleles per marker. The number of alleles ranged from 2 (41 markers) to 14<br />

(FI281137 and FI299984) per marker. The PIC value for these 184 polymorphic markers ranged from 0.11<br />

(AhI498806) to 0.87 (FI299984) with an average of 0.39. Majority of these polymorphic markers (155/184,<br />

84%) were derived for SSRs with 3 to 12 repeats while 29 (16%) markers were derived for SSRs with<br />

higher number of repeat units (>12). In addition to the above, a total of 178 retro-transposon based and 72<br />

EST based primer pairs in collaboration with Dr. Sachiko Isobe, KDRI, Japan were synthesized and<br />

screened for amplification and polymorphism. With this set of the SSR markers, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> has a repository<br />

for 4735 SSR markers in groundnut.<br />

RK Varshney, B Gautami, K Ravi, MK Pandey, DR Cook and S Isobe<br />

Pigeonpea: In case of pigeonpea, a set of ca. 3200 genomic SSR markers was developed. These SSRs have<br />

been also tested for length polymorphism on a set of 22 parental genotypes of 13 mapping populations<br />

segregating for different traits. In total, 842 polymorphic SSR markers have been identified. Developed set<br />

of SSR markers has been made available public in the form of several research articles published in<br />

international journals like Plant Breeding, (Plant Breeding 129:142-148), Molecular Breeding (Molecular<br />

Breeding 26:371-380) and BMC Plant Biology.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Programme, Department of Biotechnology and Indian Council of Agricultural<br />

Research (Government of India)<br />

RK Varshney<br />

Activity: Development of molecular genetic maps<br />

2011 2.4.2<br />

Milestone 2.4.8.3: Molecular genetic maps and consensus maps based on SSRs, DArTs and EST-based<br />

markers developed for chickpea, pigeonpea and groundnut (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, Germany, Australia and USA<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

University of Frankfurt (Germany), University of California- Davis (USA), National Research Centre on<br />

Plant Biotechnology (NRCPB, India), National Institute for Plant Genome Research (India), DArT Pty Ltd<br />

(Australia)<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Chickpea: Genotyping data for polymorphic SSR, DArT and SNP markers generated at ICRSAT and<br />

obtained from collaborators on the inter specific mapping population ICC 4958 × PI 489777 was used for<br />

developing the reference genetic map. By using JoinMap v 4.0, a dense genetic map comprising of 1291<br />

marker loci has been developed. This is, probably, the most comprehensive genetic map of chickpea<br />

available so far.<br />

In addition, efforts have been made to develop the transcript map of chickpea. In this context, as mentioned<br />

in 2.4.8.1, 281 easily assayable markers including 143 CGMMs, 87 CISRs and 51 ICCeMs were screened<br />

on 5 parental genotypes of three mapping populations. As a result, 104 polymorphic markers were<br />

identified that includes 90 markers for the inter-specific mapping population. 62 of these GMMs together<br />

with 218 earlier published markers (including 64 GMM loci) and 20 unpublished markers could be<br />

integrated into the genetic map. The genetic map developed so, therefore, has a total of 300 loci including<br />

127


126 GMM loci and spans 766.56 cM, with an average inter-marker distance of 2.55 cM. This transcript<br />

map has been communicated for publication in Theoretical and Applied Genetics.<br />

RK Varshney, M Thudi, Abhishek Bohra, SN Nayak,<br />

Ashish Kumar, Neha Gujaria, Pooran Gaur, Hari D Upadhyaya,<br />

Sabhyata Bhatia, Güenter Kahl, Peter Winter and DR Cook<br />

Groundnut:<br />

A total of 3213 SSR markers available in public domain as well as unpublished markers available from<br />

different sources were screened on the parental genotypes of the three mapping populations (ICGV 86031 ×<br />

TAG 24, ICGS 44 × ICGS 76 and ICGS 76 × CSMG 84-1). Genotyping data generated for polymorphic<br />

markers were used for construction of three individual linkage maps. Number of mapped loci on these<br />

maps ranged from 87 to 191. Two versions of the genetic maps based on TAG 24 × ICGV 86031<br />

population have been published (Varshney et al. 2009, Theoretical and Applied Genetics 118: 729-739;<br />

Ravi et al. <strong>2010</strong>, Theoretical and Applied Genetics DOI 10.1007/s00122-010-1517-0). Subsequently, by<br />

using three genetic maps developed for three different mapping populations, a consensus genetic map was<br />

constructed with 293 marker loci spanning 20 linkage groups with a total map distance of 2840.8 cM using<br />

the software MergeMap (Table 10). Marker density ranged from 3.15 (LG20) to 19.86 (LG12) with a mean<br />

density of 9.96 cM per marker. Inter-locus distance ranged from 5.68 cM (LG14) to 22.7 cM (LG20), with<br />

average length of 11.08 cM per marker. Similarly, map length of different LGs ranged from 6.3 cM (LG20)<br />

to 293.37 cM (LG4) with a mean of 142.04 cM. Of the 293 mapped loci, 65.2% loci had marker intervals<br />

less than 10 cM, 26.9 % had interval distance between 11-30 cM while remaining 7.85% markers showed<br />

marker intervals more than 30 cM. Based on the common markers and the comparison between individual<br />

maps, majority of the linkage groups were consistent among the individual maps with few exceptions.<br />

RK Varshney, B Gautami, K Ravi, MK Pandey and DA Hoisington<br />

Table 10. Features of the consensus genetic map of groundnut prepared based on three RIL<br />

populations<br />

Consensus<br />

linkage group<br />

Mapped loci Length<br />

(cM)<br />

Consensus<br />

linkage group<br />

Mapped<br />

loci<br />

Length (cM)<br />

LG1 17 178.21 LG11 15 135.74<br />

LG2 16 96.21 LG12 8 158.9<br />

LG3 28 225.93 LG13 20 236.19<br />

LG4 16 293.37 LG14 11 110<br />

LG5 28 233 LG15 5 67.6<br />

LG6 16 157.95 LG16 10 51.14<br />

LG7 31 198.09 LG17 7 44.1<br />

LG8 19 105.9 LG18 11 102.6<br />

LG9 9 59.8 LG19 8 123.6<br />

LG10 16 256.17 LG20 2 6.3<br />

Pigeonpea: An interspecific mapping population (Cajanus cajan ICP 28 × C. scrabaeoides ICPW 94) has<br />

been targeted for developing the reference map of pigeonpea. Two separate groups of genetic maps on the<br />

basis of 554 DArT markers data were developed earlier and reported in 2009<strong>Archival</strong> <strong>Report</strong>. These results<br />

have been accepted for publication in Journal of Genetics. Subsequently, the same mapping population<br />

has been used for generating genotyping data for a total of 310 polymorphic SSR markers and 624 SNP<br />

markers, in collaboration with Doug Cook of University of California-Davis, USA. As a result, a dense<br />

genetic map has been developed that is comprised of 833 markers (624 SNPs and 209 SSRs) and a total<br />

map length of 1010.64 cM,<br />

In addition to above, five intraspecific F 2 mapping populations of pigeonpea (ICPA 2039 × ICPR 2447,<br />

ICPA 2043 × ICPR 2671, ICPA 2043 × ICPR 3467, ICPB 2049 × ICPL 99050, and ICP 8863× ICPL<br />

20097) have been used for developing the genetic maps for cultivated pigeonpea. After screening of 3072<br />

128


SSR markers and genotyping the mapping populations with polymorphic markers, genetic linkage maps<br />

have been developed for all the above five mapping populations. All the above linkage maps have 11<br />

linkage groups, and the number of mapped marker loci ranged from 60 (ICPB 2049 × ICPL 99050) to 140<br />

(ICPA 2043 × ICPR 3467). Construction of a consensus linkage map for the cultivated pigeonpea is in<br />

progress and will be completed as soon as possible.<br />

RK Varshney, Abhishek Bohra, RK Saxena, Anuja Dubey,<br />

Shi Ying Yang, Hari D Upadhyaya and Andrzej Kilian<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Programme, Department of Biotechnology and Indian Council of Agricultural<br />

Research (Government of India)<br />

Milestone 2.4.8.4: Molecular genetic maps and consensus maps based on SSRs, DArTs and EST-based<br />

markers developed for pearl millet (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from CTH<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.8.5: SSRs and EST-based marker positions identified on sorghum genome sequence,<br />

providing consensus map (2009)<br />

Progress not reported for 2009<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from CTH<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Output target 2.4.9: Data management infrastructure development (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Data capture instruments expanded and functionality increased<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.2: Data submission, curation and fulfilling database interoperability requirements,<br />

generation of crop-specific trait ontologies (2009)<br />

Progress reported:<br />

80%<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

129


Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.3: Data availability through GUI, web services and ongoing curation and generation of<br />

crop-specific trait ontologies (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.4: Ongoing data submission, curation, using ontologies for trait data processing. (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Data sets have started to be uploaded into ICRIS data base.<br />

Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.5: All components of the Information system for MAB designed and developed (2009)<br />

Progress reported:<br />

80%<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.6: Information system for MAB tested, alpha version released and user training (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.9.7: Information system for MAB beta-version released and user training (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

130


Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Output target 2.4.10: Development of data analysis tools (2011)<br />

Activity: Enhancement of iMAS decision support system for MAB<br />

Milestone 2.4.10.1: iMAS version2.0 released (2009)<br />

Progress reported:<br />

90%<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Sudan, Egypt, India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NA<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Project was finished and all milestones, except one were achieved. Final technical report of project has<br />

been submitted to GCP. However, during year <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 63 participants representing 12 countries<br />

from Asia and Africa were trained in use of iMAS.<br />

A Rathore<br />

Milestone 2.4.10.3: Open source data analysis tools for comparative genomics made available, wrapped as<br />

web services (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Milestone 2.4.10.4: Sequence data analysis tools enhanced, users trained on use of tools through<br />

bioinformatics workflows (2011)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India, USA, UK<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NCGR, TSL and University of Exeter<br />

131


Progress/Results:<br />

In addition to developing tools for sequence analysis, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> team in collaboration with NCGR, TSL and<br />

University of Exeter has started to develop bioinformatic tools and approaches for analyzing the next<br />

generation sequencing (NGS) data, as these technologies are generating large amount of sequence data.<br />

NGS technologies like Illumina/ Solexa, ABSOLiD in general generate short sequence tags (SSTs) that are<br />

aligned with the reference genome and SNPs are identified. Several bioinformatics tools have been<br />

developed in recent past to align the SSTs and identify SNPs. To identify the most appropriate tool and<br />

approach to identify the SNPs based on short reads, in a species like chickpea that doesn’t enjoy the<br />

availability of the reference genome, NGS pipeline has been developed after optimization of several tools<br />

and analytical approaches and is available at http://hpc.icrisat.cgiar.org/NGS/ .<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Programme<br />

Trushar Shah, Sarwar Azam, Vivek Thakur, R. Pradeep,<br />

A BhanuPrakash, B Jayashree, Andrew D Farmer, David J Studholme,<br />

Greg D May and Jonathan DG Jones and RK Varshney<br />

Milestone 2.4.10.5: Users trained to carry out data analysis through bioinformatics workflows (2012)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

<strong>Report</strong> awaited from TS<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Output target 2.4.11: RILs and mapping populations of staple crops assembled for utilization (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Assemble and make available for distribution the existent RILs of staple crops and small millets<br />

that are in the public domain in seed and DNA form<br />

Milestone 2.4.11.5: DNA of different RIL populations isolated (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

DNA of RILs of LLS and rust tolerance in groundnut, drought tolerance in chickpea and helicoverpa<br />

tolerance in pigeonpea was extracted and conserved.<br />

HD Upadhyaya and RK Varshney<br />

Milestone 2.4.11.6: Marker and phenotype databases for the available RIL mapping populations curated<br />

(<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

132


Progress/Results:<br />

RILs of chickpea and groundnut were phenotyped and data is available. Compilation of genotypic data is in<br />

progress.<br />

HD Upadhyaya<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 2.4.4<br />

Out put target 2.4.12: Agriculturally beneficial micro-organisms assembled for utilization with<br />

associated capacity development (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity: Assemble and conserve agriculturally beneficial microorganisms for utilization and distribution<br />

Milestone 2.4.12.1: Agriculturally beneficial microorganisms from diverse environments accessed and<br />

characterized for 6 different traits – P- solubilization, antagonism to disease-causing fungi, pathogenicity<br />

to insect-pest, siderophore production (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Evaluation and conservation of bacterial and actinomycete isolates, accessed from various herbal<br />

composts and sorghum and rice rhizosphere, for plant growth promoting traits including managers<br />

of insect pests, antagonists of fungal pathogens, P-solublization and siderophore production: This<br />

study was done in order to identify potential antagonistic Actinomycetes against Fusarium wilt in chickpea<br />

under field conditions. A total of 137 Actinomycetes, isolated from 25 different herbal vermicomposts,<br />

were characterized for their antagonistic potential against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (FOC). Of<br />

them, five most promising FOC antagonistic isolates (CAI-24, -121, -127, KAI-32 and -90) were<br />

characterized by dual-culture assay for the production of siderophore, cellulase, protease, hydrocyanic acid<br />

(HCN), indole acetic acid (IAA) and antagonistic potential against Macrophomina phaseolina (Rhizoctonia<br />

bataticola), that causes dry root rot in chickpea (three strains viz. RB-6, -24 and -115) and sorghum (one<br />

strain), by dual-culture assay. All the five FOC antagonistic isolates produced siderophore and HCN, four<br />

produced IAA (except KAI-90) and two (KAI-32 and -90) produced cellulase and CAI-24 and -127<br />

produced protease. In the dual culture assay, three of the FOC antagonistic isolates, CAI-24, KAI-32 and -<br />

90 also inhibited all the three strains of R. bataticola, while two of them inhibited M. phaseolina (KAI-32<br />

and -90). When the FOC antagonistic isolates were evaluated further for their antagonistic potential in the<br />

greenhouse and wilt-sick field conditions on chickpea, 45−76% and 4−19% reduction of disease incidence<br />

was observed, respectively, over the control. The sequences of 16S rDNA gene of the isolates CAI-24, -<br />

121, -127, KAI-32 and -90 were matched with Streptomyces tsusimaensis, S. caviscabies, S. setonii, S.<br />

africanus and Streptomyces spp., respectively, in BLAST analysis. This study indicated that the selected<br />

Actinomycete isolates have the potential for biological control of Fusarium wilt disease in chickpea.<br />

A total of ten potential plant growth promoting isolates, 8 Actinomycetes (CAI-121- Streptomyces setonii,<br />

CAI-127- S. setonii, CAI-24- S. anulatus, CAI-68- S. flavogriseus, KAI-26- S. sampsoni, KAI-27- S.<br />

koyangensis, KAI-32- S. tendae and KAI-90- S. tendae) and 2 bacteria (PR-7- Pseudomonas libanensis and<br />

PR-4- P. fragi) were identified by 16S rDNA analysis.<br />

S Gopalakrishnan<br />

133


Milestone 2.4.12.2: Existing collection of agriculturally beneficial microorganisms conserved for medium<br />

and long-term storage system and annually 20% germplasm attended (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Conservation of already isolated plant growth promoting bacterial and actinomycete isolates for<br />

medium and long tem preservation: In the year <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 35 plant growth promoting bacteria and<br />

Actinomycetes were freeze dried in the ampoules for long term preservation. These were as follows:<br />

Bacteria- HIB-9, -19, 56, -67, -91, EB-27, -35, -67, -75, -77, SB-9, -21, CDB-58, -59, -35, LS-12, BCB-21,<br />

-114, SRI-156, -158, -178, -229 and -305; Actinomycetes- MMA-32, CAI-21, -24, -26, -68, KAI-27, -32<br />

and -90; Rhizobium- IC-59 and -2058 (chickpea rhizobia) and PR-4 and -7 (Pongamia rhizobia).<br />

S Gopalakrishnan<br />

Milestone 2.4.12.3: Requested agriculturally beneficial microorganisms distributed to bonafide users for<br />

utilization (Annual)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Production and supply of Rhizobium and other PGPR to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> as well as NRCS scientists: Over<br />

one thousand units (1009 units; one unit is sufficient to cover one acre of land) of carrier based different<br />

Rhizobium inoculants (chickpea, pigeonpea and groundnut) were supplied on request to NARS, farmers and<br />

peer scientists at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> (Table 11). Further, two units of chickpea rhizobia (IC-76 and -2099) and one<br />

unit of Metarhizium anisopliae in agar based slopes were supplied to NARS scientists.<br />

S Gopalakrishnan<br />

Table 11. Agar based cultures supplied in the year <strong>2010</strong><br />

S. No Date Strain Name No. of slopes Person/Address<br />

1 30-9-<strong>2010</strong> Metarhizium anisopliae 1 Dr. C H Murali Mohan<br />

Dept. of Biotechnology<br />

GITAM Institute of Technology<br />

GITAM University, Visakhapatnam<br />

2 7-12-<strong>2010</strong> Chickpea Rhizobium strains IC 76 1 Dr R V Vyas<br />

Chickpea Rhizobium strains IC 2099 1 Research Scientist<br />

Department of Microbiology<br />

B A College of Agriculture<br />

Anand Agricultural University<br />

Anand-388110<br />

134


S. No Date Strain Name No. of slopes Person/Address<br />

Carrier based cultures supplied in the year <strong>2010</strong><br />

1 30-3-<strong>2010</strong> Groundnut Rhizobium strain IC 7001 1 E Manik Reddy<br />

Pigeonpea Rhizobium strain IC 4060 1 Farmer<br />

Chickpea Rhizobium strain IC 76 1 Bhanur, Medak (Dist.)<br />

2 24-05-<strong>2010</strong> Pigeonpea Rhizobium strain IC 4060 1 Dr Nalini Mallikarjuna<br />

Pigeonpea Rhizobium strain IC 3195 1 Senior Scientist,<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

3 16-11-<strong>2010</strong> Chickpea Rhizobium strain IC 76 2 Dr. L Krishnamurthy,<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

Scientist, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

4 20-11-<strong>2010</strong> Chickpea Rhizobium strain IC 76 1000 Dr. Suresh Pande<br />

Principal Scientist, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

4 8-12-<strong>2010</strong> Groundnut Rhizobium strain IC 7001 2 Dr Ratna Kumar<br />

Visiting Scientist, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

List of collaborating Scientist<br />

AB : A Bohra<br />

AD : A Dubey<br />

AK : A Kilian<br />

AK : A Kumar<br />

AR : Abhishek Rathore<br />

BG : B Gautami<br />

BS : B Sarathbabu<br />

BH : Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

BVSR : BVS Reddy<br />

CB : C Billot<br />

CLLG : CLL Gowda<br />

CRR : CR Ravishankar<br />

CTH : CT Hash<br />

DN : D Naresh<br />

DT : D This<br />

DAH : DA Hoisington<br />

DRC : DR Cook<br />

ESM : ES Monyo<br />

GK : G Kaul<br />

HS : H Sudini<br />

HCS : HC Sharma<br />

HDU : HD Upadhyaya<br />

JC : J Chantereau<br />

JFR : Jean-Francois Rami<br />

KA : K Anitha<br />

KR : K Ravi<br />

KBS : KB Saxena<br />

KSV : KS Varaprasad<br />

135


LG : L Gardes<br />

MD : M Deu<br />

MT : M Thudi<br />

MS : Mamta Sharma<br />

MS : Mansee Sriswathi<br />

MM : Mary Mgonja<br />

MKP : MK Pandey<br />

NG : N Gujaria<br />

NL : N Lalitha<br />

NM : Nalini Mallikarjuna<br />

NDRKS : NDRK Sharma<br />

PL : P Lu<br />

PR : P Ramu<br />

PSR : P Srinivasa Rao<br />

PW : P Winter<br />

PJH : PJ Hiremath<br />

PMG : PM Gaur<br />

PRKR : PRK Raju<br />

RR : R Rivallan<br />

RS : Rajan Sharma<br />

RDVJPR : RDVJ Prasada Rao<br />

RKS : RK Saxena<br />

RKV : RK Varshney<br />

RPT : RP Thakur<br />

RTF : RT Falkertsma<br />

SB : S Bhatia<br />

SBo : S Bouchet<br />

SGK : S Gopal Krishnan<br />

SI : S Isobe<br />

SS : S Senthilvel<br />

SYY : Shi Ying Yang<br />

SKC : SK Chakrabarthy<br />

SKS : SK Singh<br />

SKV : SK Varshney<br />

SNN : SN Nayak<br />

SP : Suresh Pande<br />

TW : T Wang<br />

TS : Trushar Shah<br />

VV : V Vadez<br />

YL : Y Li<br />

YN : Y Narasimhudu<br />

136


MTP Project 3:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Producing more and better food from the staple cereals and legumes of the<br />

west and central African (WCA) SAT (sorghum, pearl millet and<br />

groundnut) through genetic improvement<br />

Eva Weltzein Rattunde<br />

Output 1: Heterotic relationships identified within sorghum and pearl millet germplasm adapted to WCA<br />

conditions and appropriate broad-based breeding populations and hybrid parents and knowledge made<br />

available to NARS and other partners in order to maximise genetic gain from selection<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong>: 3.1.1<br />

Five new pearl millet and five sorghum inbred lines with good combining ability identified and<br />

characterized; seed made available to partners with associated capacity development for developing<br />

hybrid cultivars<br />

Pearl millet heterotic groupings based on combining ability estimates identified<br />

Rationale<br />

Building on the initial heterotic grouping of WCA pearl millet landraces undertaken in the BMZ-funded<br />

“Mobilizing regional diversity” project , the next step was to classify new WCA inbred lines into heterotic<br />

groups, for a more targeted use in hybrid breeding.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

141 testcrosses of new WCA inbred lines on two population testers from Senegal and Niger (with testers<br />

belonging to putative different heterotic groups) were evaluated at Sadore in rainy season <strong>2010</strong> to classify<br />

the respective inbred lines into heterotic groups (MSc thesis of Christof Böhm). The heterotic grouping was<br />

based on combining ability (CA) patterns.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Three groups were identified with i) high CA towards the tester of Niger but low or negative CA to the<br />

tester of Senegal (heterotic group 1), ii) high CA towards the tester of Senegal but low or negative CA<br />

towards the tester of Niger(heterotic group 2); and iii) high CA towards both testers (heterotic group 3). For<br />

certain materials, the grouping according to CA patterns corresponded to a grouping according to genetic<br />

distance of the inbred line’s parental populations as determined by SSR markers. In other words, CA<br />

analysis grouped lines derived from genetically distant landraces mostly, though not always, into different<br />

heterotic clusters. Also, the testcross trial revealed hybrids with significantly superior grain yield (127%)<br />

compared to the best open-pollinated checks.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The best crosses should be validated and developed further to become new varieties. The respective inbred<br />

lines should be multiplied and shared with partners, thereby underlining the importance of building hybrid<br />

breeding on the concept of heterotic groups.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Sweet Sorghum hybrid parents tested for adaptation in WCA<br />

Rationale<br />

One of the objectives of the IFAD biofuels project “Linking the poor to global markets: Pro-poor<br />

development of biofuel Supply Chains” is to identify promising hybrid parents for sweet sorghum hybrid<br />

development. A number of promising male parents identified during the 2007 and 2008 variety evaluations<br />

were used for test-crosses in 2009.<br />

137


Materials and Methods<br />

Altogether five sweet sorghum A-lines from the Patancheru breeding program and eight sweet sorghum<br />

varieties were used in test crosses for hybrid development at Samanko: 5 Malian landraces, one caudatum<br />

sweet sorghum type with favorable grain quality from the CIRAD collection and two IS germplasm lines.<br />

F1 seed was shared between the IER breeding program and the Samanko program for evaluation of fertility<br />

restoration and sugar-yield related traits. In total, 48 test crosses between Patancheru sweet sorghum A-<br />

lines and high-potential sweet sorghum varieties and germplasm lines were evaluated by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and IER<br />

for fertility restoration and desirable sweet sorghum traits at both Samanko and Sotuba in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Preliminary results show that F1 hybrids derived from the bicolor parents were the most promising for<br />

sugar-yield related traits. Different levels of fertility restoration by the male parents were observed in the<br />

various combinations, tending towards sterility maintenance for the bicolor types and fertility restoration<br />

for the caudatum types. Data has not yet been completely analyzed. A/B-lines were shared with IER<br />

scientists at Sotuba who have a strong interest in developing specific sweet sorghum ideotypes with high<br />

sugar and biomass potential. For the <strong>2010</strong>/11 off-season, IER planned several test-crosses for further<br />

analysis of fertility restoration and performance.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In view of the high biomass and sugar potential (brix>16%), the juiciness and vigorous appearance of<br />

hybrids derived from the male parent “local de Namakan”, it would be interesting to transform this variety<br />

into an A-line (high frequency of male sterile plants in hybrid). Experienced breeders at IER are weighing<br />

up whether to integrate this activity into their hybrid development program.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Sorghum hybrid parents characterised for the Sudanian and Guinea zones of West Africa<br />

Rationale<br />

A set of sorghum hybrid parents bred in Mali over the past ten years by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and IER is now available<br />

for hybrid production. The general and specific combing ability of these lines were characterized to<br />

identify superior lines for hybrid development and to choose lines as source material for breeding the next<br />

cycle of hybrid parents.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 60 hybrids produced with five females parents (3 Inter-racial and 2 Guinea) and 12 males parent<br />

(6 Inter-racial and 6 Guinea) were tested together with 6 check varieties using alpha lattice design with<br />

three (2007) or four (2008) reps in four environments (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko Low-P and High-P, IER-Sotuba,<br />

and IER-Cinzana). Grain yield was measured and REML and Regression procedures of GENSTAT were<br />

used for the analysis.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The general combining ability (GCA) values for male parents showed more consistency over the six<br />

environments from Samanko and Sotuba stations, located at 12 N latitude (Table), as compared the more<br />

northerly Cinzana site (13 N latitude). The mean GCA values computed over the Samanko and Sotuba<br />

sites showed a wide range with of large agronomic importance. For example, the male parent ‘Lata’ gave a<br />

308 kg ha-1 yield advantage, on average, over all hybrids in which this line was a parent.<br />

The male parents with the best combining abilities were of derived from Guinea-Caudatum inter-racial<br />

crossing and from a Guinea-race population which is expected to have between 75 to 87.5% Guinea race<br />

genetic background. Both Guinea landrace parents as well as Caudatum-race parents showed very poor<br />

combining ability. Some correlation between shorter stem internode lengths and combining ability was<br />

observed among this set of male-parents, with the 3 highest GCA lines having short to intermediate<br />

internode lengths whereas the 5 lowest GCA lines all had longer internode lengths.<br />

138


The female parents however showed a different pattern, with the tall landrace parent ‘FambeA’ showing<br />

highest GCA in the two low-P environments whereas the shorter inter-racial parent 97-SB-F5DT-150A had<br />

the highest GCA values in the high-P environments at both Samanko and Sotuba.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The Guinea Population derivative ‘Lata’ and Guinea-Caudatum inter-racial line 02-SB-F4DT-298 showed<br />

the highest GCA values among the male lines, and thus should be used for future hybrid development and<br />

as source material for R-line breeding.<br />

Table 1. General combining ability values for grain yield in gm -2 of 12 male parents in each of seven<br />

environments, and the mean across all environments excluding C07<br />

Origin - Racial<br />

Type Males C07* L07 L08 S07 H08 S08 H07 Mean<br />

00-KO-F5DT-19 9 15 21 -23 45 -84 -1 -4.5<br />

Caudatum MALISOR-92-1 37 -5 -22 -17 50 -46 0 -6.7<br />

02-SB-F4DT-298 15 2 15 46 14 70 -4 23.8<br />

02-SB-F5DT-189 12 -40 -52 -13 -30 -72 -32 -39.8<br />

Inter-racial GRINKAN -8 9 30 23 40 51 17 28.3<br />

Guinea<br />

Population<br />

Guinea landrace<br />

CGM-19/9-1-1 -29 12 39 -6 -10 52 16 17.2<br />

LATA 3 Bala -36 16 27 71 8 27 36 30.8<br />

CSM-388 -16 -15 -16 -28 -72 -84 -16 -38.5<br />

CSM-63E 13 -12 -7 -43 -52 -33 12 -22.5<br />

IS 6731 -12 5 -36 -32 -48 -42 -14 -27.8<br />

SEGUETANA 12 -7 -38 -6 -14 -49 -7 -20.2<br />

se mean 14 12 11 12 16 16 15<br />

Trial mean grain yield<br />

g/m2 207 70 186 190 221 238 282<br />

*C,L,H,S denote Cinzana, low_P and high_P Samanko, and Sotuba; 07 and 08 denote 2007 and 2008<br />

Fred Rattunde, Abdoulaye Diallo and Eva Weltzien<br />

Diversifying hybrid parents for plant height, and for other production ecologies<br />

Rational<br />

Hybrid testing in Mali and Nigeria has shown that locally adapted male and female parents are essential for<br />

achieving superior grain yields with preferred grain qualities. Diversifying the hybrid parents is needed to<br />

broaden the target domains for hybrids in West and Central Africa and exploit the heterotic potential within<br />

the West African sorghum germplasm. Specific traits needed include reduced plant height of both male and<br />

female parents, and better grain and glume characteristics, including larger grain size for Nigeria.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Crosses were made at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Mali with bold grain parents. A total of 29 F2 populations were sown at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko in 2009 for conducting single plant selection. A total of 87 plants of shorter height<br />

were selected out of 25 of the F2 populations in 2009. These 87 progenies were sown head to row in two<br />

replicates and single plant selection was conducted in most progenies. F2 populations were also provided to<br />

IAR-Samaru, Nigeria and pedigree selection was practiced in 2009 and <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

A total of 183 F4.3 progenies were selected. The majority of selected progenies show much larger grain<br />

size than any of the currently available hybrid parents. The 52 progenies selected from the Fara Fara 12<br />

and CK 60B cross and seven dwarf progenies of the IS 15401 x Ck60B cross will be testcrossed to identify<br />

which express the maintainer reaction. These lines would be used to produce the urgently need larger<br />

139


grained, well adapted, female seed-parents for producing new hybrids for Nigeria. The remaining<br />

progenies will be evaluated as potential male parents.<br />

Fred Rattunde and Eva Weltzien<br />

Target 2011: 3.1.1<br />

Six sorghum hybrids for at least two countries in West Africa identified, release relevant information as<br />

well as parental seed made available to partners<br />

Multi-location testing of sorghum hybrids in the Sudanian zone<br />

Rational<br />

Adaptation and acceptable yield performance over diverse environments in the target zone is a requirement<br />

for commercially viable hybrids. Multiple environment testing over differing soil fertility levels, sowing<br />

dates and Striga infestation is necessary to determine hybrid productivity and stability. Additionally, the<br />

temptation of West African farmers to sow F2 seed makes the hybrid F2 performance also of interest.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A series of initial and advanced multi-location hybrid evaluation trials were conducted in collaboration<br />

with the national programs in Mali, Burkina Faso and Nigeria in 2009 and <strong>2010</strong>. The initial trials, with 30<br />

entries, including checks, were conducted only on experiment stations. Advanced testing of hybrids and<br />

varieties was done in Short- and Tall-Height trials both on-station and on-farm. A total 14 sorghum hybrids<br />

were tested in 11 farmer managed trials in Mali over 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> with four replicates per site. Data was<br />

collected on rainfall, soil Bray P1, and agronomic performance traits, focusing on grain yield. Separate<br />

trials comparing F1 and F2 hybrid performance were conducted at Samanko and Sotuba in 2008 and 2009.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The two highest yielding hybrids were Fadda (12A x Lata) and 97-SB-F5DT-150A x Grinkan, with 3.0<br />

t/ha mean grain yield over the initial on-station trials in 2009. The landrace check variety CSM388, in<br />

comparison, had only 2.3t/ha yield.<br />

Short hybrids gave an average yield superiority of 20% and the best hybrids more than 30% superiority<br />

over the well adapted local check ‘Tieble’ across all on-farm trials in both the Dioila and Mande zones in<br />

2009 with repeatabilities over 0.40 (Table1). Tall hybrids showed smaller yield advantages.<br />

Analysis of F1 and F2 hybrid yields over 5 environments showed F2 yield decreases differed depending on<br />

type of parent combinations. Severe F2 yield reduction was observed for Sewa, based an inter-racial<br />

parents, whereas no yield loss was observed for Pablo, based on Guinea-race parents.<br />

A total of 20 farmers were supported in <strong>2010</strong> with provision of parental seed for hybrid seed production,<br />

field protocols and visits. Hybrid seed production was introduced in the more market-oriented Dioila zone,<br />

and expanded in the Mande zone. Three one-day training workshops on hybrid seed production were<br />

conducted in Mali by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and IER.<br />

Table 1. Mean grain yields (t/ha) and percent superiority of hybrids and varieties in 11 Short- and<br />

Tall-Plant Height on-farm trials conducted in the Dioila and Mande zones of Mali, 2009<br />

Dioila Means over 5 Trials Mande Means over 6 Trials<br />

Yield<br />

Superiority* Yield<br />

Superiority*<br />

Short Hybrids<br />

(t/ha) Name (%)<br />

(t/ha) Name (%)<br />

All Hybrids (n=8) 1.9 26 2.3 23<br />

Best Hybrid 2.0 Mona 32 2.8 Sewa 51<br />

Local Check 1.5 Tieble 1.9 Tieble<br />

Tall Hybrids<br />

All Hybrids (n=7) 2.0 7 1.8 16<br />

Best Hybrid 2.2 Caufa 21 1.9 Caufa 26<br />

Local Check 1.9 Tieble 1.5 Tieble<br />

* Percent superiority over well adapted landrace check ‘Tieble’<br />

140


Table 2. Grain yield and percent superiority of hybrid F1 and F2 relative to landrace check means<br />

(CSM388 and Tieble) across 5 trials at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko and IER-Sotuba, 2008 and 2009<br />

F1 Yield F1<br />

F1 Yield F2<br />

Hybrid Pedigree Type* (t/ha) Superiority% (t/ha) Superiority%<br />

Sewa 150Ax02-F4DT-298 IRxIR 3.6 36 2.2 -17<br />

Fadda 12AxLata IRxG 3.6 36 3.1 17<br />

Pablo FambeAxLata GxG 3.5 32 3.5 32<br />

*Type: IR denotes Inter-racial, G denotes Guinea-race<br />

Striga susceptibility, as measured by the cumulative Area Under Striga Number Progress Curve<br />

(AUSNPC), tended to be higher for later maturing hybrids in <strong>2010</strong>. Among the short hybrids in <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

Mona (PR3009A x Lata) had the lowest susceptibility (24,000) and was comparable to the local check<br />

‘Tieble’. Sigui Kumbe ((150A x 00-KO-F5DT-19) and Yougo (12A x CGM19/9-1-1) (43,000, se 4,300)<br />

were the most susceptible. Among the tall hybrids, Pablo (FambeA x Lata) had the lowest (32,000) and<br />

Omba (FambeA x IS6731) (40,000) and Caufa (FambeA x CGM19/9-1-1) (50,000) had the highest<br />

AUSNPC, relative to Tieble (36,000, se 5,300).<br />

Conclusions<br />

The hybrid Fadda has shown superior and stable yields and relatively lower yield reduction of its F2.<br />

Fred Rattunde, Eva Weltzien, Abdoualye Diallo and Felix Frey<br />

Target 2011: 3.1.2<br />

Five pearl millet inbred lines, and 2 populations with high general combining ability backcrossed into<br />

male-sterility inducing A4 cytoplasm<br />

Identifying restorer lines in inbred lines derived from WCA Pearl millet germplasm<br />

Rationale<br />

Previous research has shown that presently available male-sterile pearl millet lines are too early flowering<br />

and insufficiently adapted to WCA growing conditions. Therefore the need to develop new, adapted male<br />

sterile lines WCA genetic background. An important step in this direction is the classification of new WCA<br />

inbred lines into maintainer and restorer for different male-sterility conferring cytoplasms.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Analysis of data derived from the evaluation of 30 testcrosses of new WCA inbred lines on male-sterile line<br />

17A (A-Aegps cytoplasm) in the rainy season 2009 provided initial evidence for lack of restorer types on<br />

A-Aegps cytoplasm in WCA germplasm (MSc thesis C. Böhm). To validate these initial findings, and<br />

broaden the germplasm base, the following number of crosses were successfully produced in the off-season<br />

2009/10: 138 crosses of new WCA inbreds on cms line 14A (A1 cytoplasm), 124 on cms line 17A (A-Aeps<br />

cytoplasm), and 113 crosses on cms line LCICMA7 (A4 cytoplasm). The testcrosses were evaluated<br />

together with checks at Sadore under well-fertilized field conditions during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. A MSc<br />

student (Bachir Issoufa) from CRESA (Univ. of Niamey, Niger) has helped collecting the data. Data<br />

analysis is still underway.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Initial results from the <strong>2010</strong> trials confirm a general lack of reliable restorer genotypes in the WCA<br />

germplasm for all three cytoplasms tested. Only a few lines seemed to segregate for fertility restoration and<br />

will need to be selfed and investigated further to obtain lines with genetically fixed restorer alleles for the<br />

three cytoplasms. Alternatively, a new project may be developed to transfer restorer alleles from Indian<br />

germplasm into WCA material, using marker-assisted selection.<br />

Conclusions<br />

All 206 available WCA inbred lines have been advanced in the off-season 2009/10 and are presently again<br />

advanced in the off-season <strong>2010</strong>/11. Final data analysis of the <strong>2010</strong> testcross trials on cms lines is required<br />

141


to plan conversion of new WCA lines into male-sterile/maintainer (A/B) line pairs. This will be started in<br />

the second off-season (planting early February 2011)<br />

Bettina IG. Haussmann<br />

Output 2: Improved methodologies developed for integrating breeding of groundnut, sorghum and pearl<br />

millet populations and varieties with crop management strategies to overcome key environmental and<br />

socio-economic constraints and making them available with new knowledge to partners<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong>: 3.2.1<br />

Tools for farmer participatory recurrent selection tested for pearl millet and sorghum with partners with<br />

associated capacity development in different agro-ecologies. (associated with PRGA SWEP)<br />

Assessing genetic grain from recurrent selection in pearl millet populations under Sahelian target<br />

conditions<br />

Rationale<br />

Different options exist to enhance development of appropriate breeding populations and new experimental<br />

cultivars with farmers participation and thereby building on farmer’s knowledge. The McKnight-<br />

Foundation funded breeding project aimed at developing an initial strategy for efficient farmerparticipatory<br />

pearl millet improvement. Specific research questions were (i) after two cycles of selection<br />

using different on-farm and on-station selection methods, which method was most efficient for enhancing<br />

yields; (ii) what are the advantages and disadvantages of the various selection methods used; (iii) which<br />

agro-morphological traits changed during the selection; (iv) do farmer-selected varieties adapt beyond their<br />

sites of selection; (v) what is the extend of genotype x environment interaction (GxE) in on-station versus<br />

on-farm trials and what are the implications of the observed GxE for participatory pearl millet<br />

improvement?<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The study was initiated by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in 2006 at three pilot sites in Niger. Site-specific base populations<br />

were created in the off-season 2006/07 using materials selected by farmers in the rainy season 2006. In<br />

2007, two to four farmers per site did on-farm simple mass selection (SMS) in subsamples of the<br />

populations. In 2008, five different selection methods were applied: on-farm SMS, on-farm mass selection<br />

with parental control (SMC), on-farm full-sib family (FSF) selection, on-station FSF selection, and<br />

combined FSF selection (on-station and on-farm). In 2009, multi-location selection progress trials were<br />

conducted both on-farm and on-station.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Results showed that two cycles of SMS can significantly increase grain yield in individual cases, depending<br />

on the selection efficiency of the participating farmer-breeder. The more sophisticated FSF and SMC<br />

weren’t more efficient than SMS. Farmer selection resulted into shorter and more compact panicles, shorter<br />

plant height, better panicle exertion and in some cases higher grain yield. Biplots combining on-station and<br />

on-farm data revealed for two pilot sites that on-farm selected varieties performed better on-farm while onstation<br />

selected cultivars performed better on-station, underlining the importance of testing breeding<br />

materials on-farm. Certain varieties selected on-farm, including one selected exclusively by women, were<br />

performing above-average and achieved high farmer preference indices also at other sites, indicating the<br />

potential adaptability of farmer-selected cultivars beyond their site of selection.<br />

Conclusions<br />

As two seasons were insufficient to reliably measure selection progress in the highly variable Sahelian<br />

environments, it is recommended to continue the selection for two or three more cycles to derive final<br />

conclusions regarding the best strategy for participatory pearl millet improvement in WCA.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

142


Best-bet soil fertility management options and their interactions with genotype identified for the Sahelian<br />

zone in Niger<br />

Rationale<br />

One of the constraints to agricultural production in the Sahel is low or absence of utilization of external<br />

input due to their limited availability or high price. To help increase the rate of on-farm application of<br />

sources of nutrients, the so-called fertilizer microdosing technology was developed and demonstrated in<br />

farmers’ field with promising results. Organic amendments constitute the principal source of nutrients for<br />

agriculture. Hill application of manure combined with mineral fertilizer microdose would be an optimal<br />

way to gain the best from the potentials of both fertilizers, but also assure that there is enough manure for<br />

wider area to sustain crop production. Combination of best genotypic potential of a crop with such<br />

technology could be the key to increased crop production. The present work funded by the HOPE project<br />

seeks to determine the optimal combination of the genotype, fertilizer microdosing and organic amendment<br />

application that would favor the expression of the yield potential of millet crop.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Ten millet genotypes where evaluated under the combination of four mineral and organic fertilizer<br />

management options in a split plot design laid in three replications. The experiment was conducted at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> station at Sadore and at two INRAN research stations (Kollo, approximately 30 km from Sadore;<br />

and Maradi, approximately 600 km East of Niamey). The field at Sadore was purposely selected for low<br />

level of Bray P1 (Table 1). However it was a field under fallow cleaned for the purpose of the experiment.<br />

The same experiment was conducted as baby trials in a participatory manner with farmers of 4 localities in<br />

Western Niger (Bokki, Falwel, Tera and Dantchandou) and three localities in Eastern Niger (Serkin<br />

Haoussa, Sae Saboua and El Kolta). Eight millet genotypes were tested under various combinations of soil<br />

fertility management. During the cropping season and before harvest, the crops were evaluated with the<br />

farmers who ranked the treatments according to their appreciation.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Table 1: Soil characteristic of the experimental field at Sadore, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

Depth pH H2O Organic C Total N (mg N/kg) Bray P1<br />

(cm) (1:2.5) (%)<br />

(mg P/kg)<br />

10 5.5 0.3 247.4 4.2<br />

20 5.7 0.2 119.9 3.5<br />

Soil data of the two other sites are being analyzed. However, prior to the selection, they were reported as<br />

having low fertility, which is reflected in crop yield obtained. Grain yield was especially low on average at<br />

Maradi (206 kg/ha), compared to 953 kg/ha at Sadore.<br />

Genotype differences were observed. At Sadore MIL.DE.SIAKA".(=PE05578-C2), SOSAT-C88, and<br />

PE05572.(KADO.NIO.DE.MALI) outperformed the other genotypes, but this trend was not consistent over<br />

the two other sites (Figure 1) . Slight yield increase was observed due to mineral and organic fertilizer<br />

application but the differences were statistically significant only at Maradi.<br />

In the on-farm trials. grain yield obtained was 1000 kg/ha on average at Bokki and Falwel due to combined<br />

effect of 200g of organic manure and 2g of DAP or 6g of NPK per hill . Grain yield at Serkin Houssa and<br />

Sae Saboua were as high as 1500 kg/ha on average. According to farmers’ appreciation hill application of<br />

manure brings additional work however it is a good practice as it increases crop yield. Among the varieties<br />

tested ICMV 89305, ICMV 99001 and PE05578-C2 performed very well on all the sites however they were<br />

not better than the local variety. The analysis of the soil samples collected on each site as well as manure<br />

samples will help us to better understand the tendencies observed. The analysis is specific genotype by<br />

fertilization interaction remains to be analyzed.<br />

143


Conclusion<br />

Treatments identified together with the farmers will be tested in the coming rainy season.<br />

Fatondji Dougbedji<br />

Training courses for partners (NARS, ONG, OP) in participatory variety selection methodology<br />

Rationale<br />

Participatory variety evaluations and selection methods are widely used in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> collaborations in<br />

WCA. It is important to build on each others experience and to harmonize these procedures used by<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> and its partners in the region. Training workshops allow the different actors of the projects to<br />

contribute to a common understanding of the aims and purposes of participatory evaluations as well as an<br />

understanding of the prevailing conditions, and approaches. Training workshops enable protocols for<br />

evaluations to be harmonized, reviewed, developed, and adapted to the specific objectives of each trial<br />

or specific situation/condition of the location.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

These training courses were focused on the training of partners (researchers, technical staff, farmer leaders,<br />

NGOs, extension services) in the use of participatory tools and strategies. The program included:<br />

1. April Workshop (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, conducted in French)<br />

• How to identify the target site: Village characterization and identification of constraints, choice of<br />

farmers, choice of fields)<br />

• Trial implementations and quality control of trials<br />

• Data monitoring<br />

• Evaluation and monitoring methods (classifications, scoring)<br />

• Data entry<br />

2. October workshop (Mali, Burkina Faso participants, conducted in French and Bambara) in collaboration<br />

with FFEM 2 project<br />

• Roles of different participants during PVS activities<br />

• Stages of the breeding cycle and priority setting<br />

• Open ended evaluation<br />

• Whom to invite to PVS evaluations<br />

• Ranking and scoring tools<br />

• Evaluation and selection (voting) of varieties during PVS trials<br />

• Development of PVS strategies and protocols<br />

3. December workshop in collaboration with EU-IFAD project (with participants from Nigeria, Ghana,<br />

India, conducted in English))<br />

• Factors contributing to increasing adoption of new varieties and impacts<br />

• Tools for variety evaluation<br />

• Methods of questioning: Open questions and probing questions<br />

• Tools of evaluation: scoring and ranking<br />

• Planning PVS activities (Objectives, target conditions, Responsibilities)<br />

• Types of varieties and trials<br />

• Diagnostic tools (Venn diagram, mapping)<br />

• Seed systems<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Five-day training courses on participatory variety evaluation and breeding for pearl millet and sorghum<br />

were conducted in April, October and November of <strong>2010</strong> within the framework of the Hope Project<br />

(objectives 2, 3 and 6) and the Agrobiodiversity project (CIRAD/<strong>ICRISAT</strong>). The courses took place in<br />

Mali and each course attracted 20 to 35 participants from partner organizations from various countries<br />

(Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Ghana, Nigeria). Consequently, the participants were able to return to their<br />

144


countries and train local partners of the project at suitable locations across West Africa. Training courses<br />

for trainers will continue next year. Furthermore, concepts are being developed with the aid of the<br />

McKnight Foundation to harmonize data management and data bases across the region. A number of<br />

practical guides have since been developed which are to be reviewed for online publication on (e.g. Hope<br />

website).<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke and Eva Weltzien<br />

Evaluate two-stage recurrent selection procedure for sorghum adapted to the Sudanian zone<br />

Rationale<br />

Breeding of higher yielding sorghum varieties in the Sudanian zone requires both effective selection for<br />

both grain and glume characteristics crucial for adoption as well as yield performance over<br />

environments. Multi-location yield testing of large numbers of progenies in a sufficient sample of the target<br />

environments to make genetic gains for yield is a major challenge. We initiated a two stage progeny testing<br />

procedure, which includes multi-location testing of S2-progenies, with the objectives of developing<br />

superior varieties and effective methods for population improvement.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A set of 150 progenies were selected for testing based on 2009 on-station and on-farm observations. The<br />

testing scheme designed involves single-rep on-farm strip tests with subsets of 50 S2-progenies and<br />

replicated checks. The 150 progenies were subdivided into sets of 25, with each farmer receiving two sets.<br />

Two checks were randomized within each block of 5 test entries to enable estimate of error level and enable<br />

yield adjustments. A total of 34 tests were prepared, installed and harvested. Trials were conducted at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko under +P and –P , with data to compare researcher and farmer observations in<br />

replicated on-station relative and unreplicated on-farm results. On-station trials had four replicates in an<br />

alpha lattice incomplete block design.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The on-farm strip tests provide a good sample the diversity of environments in the target zones. For<br />

example sowing dates varied over seven weeks, from June 18 to August 5, soil types ranged from gravelly<br />

laterite to fine textured soils of contrasting fertility levels. Panicle weights and farmer appreciation scores<br />

are entered and data analysis is underway. <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko on-station panicle weights have been<br />

analysed and are to be compared with the on-farm results.<br />

Additionally in Burkina Faso, initial trails to assess gains from farmer’s selection were conducted in two<br />

regions. Based on these results we have started to plan with INERA a trial that would compare gains made<br />

under different selection conditions.<br />

Fred Rattunde, Eva Weltzien and Kirsten von Brocke<br />

Develop recurrent selection schemes for implementation with NARS and FOs in the northern Sudanian<br />

zone (in collaboration with CIRAD FFEM 2/HOPE project)<br />

Rationale<br />

The mutual objective of the Agrobiodiversity (FFEM2)and HOPE projects in the Tominian region of Mali<br />

is to start a recurrent selection program so as to develop varieties responding to the harsh climate and<br />

production objectives of farmers living in that region. Base populations developed under a previous IFAD<br />

(PROMISO) project are being used as a source of diversity to kick start a breeding program.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Protocols have been developed to start a recurrent selection scheme in the region of Tominian in four<br />

villages targeted by the Agrobiodiversity project (CIRAD/IER/<strong>ICRISAT</strong>) and the HOPE project. The aim<br />

was to conduct F2 populations derived from crosses between diverse guinea populations and landrace<br />

varieties in farmer fields for a first cycle of mass selection, and to subsequently select materials for the<br />

development of breeding lines.<br />

145


Results and Discussions<br />

During the aforementioned October workshop in Koutiala, participants were informed of how to create<br />

diversity through crosses between diverse varieties. Also discussed and illustrated with the help of posters<br />

were the methods behind the use of broad-based populations for variety development. . Workshop<br />

participants further learned about priority-setting and target conditions for selection.<br />

Conclusions<br />

If recurrent selection with NARS and FOs is to be implemented, training has to be reinforced, specifically<br />

in regard to choosing farmers’ fields as selection sites and selection methods in segregating materials.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke and Eva Weltzien<br />

Multi-location variety trials in farmers’ fields in three regions of Mali (FFEM project)<br />

Rationale<br />

The objective of the Agrobiodiversity project is to enhance sorghum biodiversity through the diffusion of<br />

new and diverse varietal options to farmers. The project offers the possibility to test and diffuse existing<br />

experimental varieties, bred by the <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER programs, in new zones of intervention, such as Sikasso<br />

and Koutiala.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Varieties derived from the <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER and the CIRAD/INERA breeding programs were incorporated<br />

into variety trials in three regions of Mali (Tominian, Koutiala, Sikasso). These included improved<br />

varieties, landraces, and breeding lines at the end of the selection process. Two sweet sorghum varieties<br />

were also brought into the tests. Five to ten varieties were used in “preliminary tests” containing 32<br />

varieties, which were tested in two villages per zone, with two farmers per village (2 replications per<br />

farmer). One to three varieties were used in “multilocational tests” that comprised 6 varieties tested by ten<br />

farmers in the same two villages per zone.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Although results are not yet available, preliminary results from the Sikasso region indicate that farmers<br />

have shown interest in two varieties contributed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER: DouaG (purified local variety) and<br />

IS23566 (sweet sorghum accession).<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong>: 3.2.2<br />

Two NARS empowered to breed groundnut varieties with multiple attributes, including drought resistance.<br />

Rational<br />

NARS in WCA lack human resources and infrastructure to execute efficient groundnut breeding programs.<br />

These weaknesses have limited the development of improved varieties and farmers continue to grow old<br />

varieties that were developed or introduced more than half a century ago. It is thus important to enhance<br />

capacity of some of the NARS for breeding groundnut varieties with multiple attributes.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A wide range of diverse genetic materials were supplied to enrich genetic diversity in NARS breeding<br />

programs. They can thus select adapted farmer-and market preferred varieties more effectively. Staff from<br />

the NARS breeding programs received theoretical training on breeding principles as well as hands-on<br />

training on how to manage a breeding program including priority skills such as hybridization, data capture<br />

and analysis.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

In the last three years more than 1000 advanced breeding lines have been supplied to the NARS in Mali,<br />

Niger and Nigeria in form of observation nurseries and/or replicated variety trials. From these trials<br />

146


national variety trials have been constituted. INRAN (Niger) was able to conduct trials at 6 locations across<br />

the major groundnut districts. In Nigeria (IAR), trials were conducted at 23 location in <strong>2010</strong> across the<br />

major groundnut producing states. In addition to the multi-location trials, a hybridization program was<br />

initiated at INRAN and IAR. This is the first time these NARS are beginning to make crosses after decades.<br />

B Ntare and F Waliyar<br />

2-3 farmer - and market-preferred groundnut varieties identified for cultivation in target countries of West<br />

Africa<br />

Rationale<br />

Farmers and processing industries demand varieties with specific desirable plant and seed traits.<br />

Knowledge of the range of plant, seed traits required for processing traits is valuable for crop improvement<br />

programs as they provide good market signals for processors. The demand for improved groundnut<br />

varieties will increase if varieties are designed to include producer and consumer preferred traits.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

PVS under the auspices of the Tropical Legumes project have been conducted in 6 villages each in Mali,<br />

Niger and Nigeria (2008-2009). Selected lines were put in larger demonstration plots in these countries.<br />

Some of these (2 in Mali, and 1 in Nigeria) have been recommended for release. Variety descriptions were<br />

prepared for the recommended varieties for release and registration in the national variety catalog. New<br />

on-farm farmer participatory variety selection trials in 5 villages (Bougoula (2), Sanambele, Fanza,<br />

Diakakegny and Tenekanu) in the Sanankoroba district, in Mali. Five groundnut varieties (ICGV 86124,<br />

ICGV 86024, ICGV 85015, ICG 7878, Fleur 11) along with a local check were evaluated by groups of<br />

women farmers in the five villages. In each village 25 women conducted the trial. The plot size was 0.1 ha<br />

per variety and unreplicated. Five women collectively managed a plot. Participating women were given 2-<br />

day training in good practices of integrated crop management before the start of the trials. A total of 150<br />

women from the farmer groups in the five villages, 10 village agents and 2 staff of PLAN Mali participated<br />

in the training. A simplified manual in French was produced for this purpose. This will be translated into<br />

the local language. Variety preference assessments were conducted during the plant establishment,<br />

flowering and harvest stages<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

In Niger, 4 varieties (Fleur 11, J11, RRB & ICG 9346) from the FPVS trials conducted in the previous 2<br />

years were registered in the national variety catalog. ICGV 86024, ICGV 86124 and ICGV 86015 are<br />

candidates for release in Mali and ICIAR 19BT in Nigeria. Preference assessment from the new trials<br />

showed that over all ICGV 86024, ICGV 86124 and Fleur 11 were the most preferred varieties across the<br />

villages. Their pod yield varied between 15-25% over the local variety.<br />

Conclusions<br />

PVS are proving to be short cut to the release of varieties. This need to be advocated so that this becomes<br />

a routine source of information for the rapid release of new varieties. None the less the release of new<br />

groundnut varieties by NARS remains a very slow process through the traditional mechanism. This is<br />

largely due to variety release committees not meeting or the NARS partners not being aggressive enough to<br />

promote new varieties through nationally coordinated trials and on-farm participatory validation tests.<br />

However, through FPVS, the variety release process can be fast tracked. The major challenge facing<br />

women groundnut farmers is the limited access to good land.<br />

B Ntare<br />

Seed of advanced breeding lines produced to share with NARS partners<br />

Rationale<br />

The availability of seed is critical to ensure that varieties that meet the needs of the farmers and markets can<br />

be widely tested, and channeled for certified seed production.<br />

147


Materials and Methods<br />

Seed of 29 promising advanced trait specific breeding lines selected from the previous on-station trials was<br />

increased at Samanko.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

A total of 1580 kg of seed of trait specific advanced breeding lines was produced at Samanko. This will be<br />

shared with NARS partners in the region and will be evaluated in new PVS trials during 2011 crop season.<br />

B Ntare<br />

At least 80-100 new breeding lines with farmer- and market-preferred traits made available to NARS for<br />

local evaluation<br />

Rationale<br />

To maintain a flow of new breeding lines, seed was supplied to various users including researchers,<br />

farmers.<br />

Material and methods<br />

A series of trait- specific preliminary and advanced performance trials were conducted at Samanko during<br />

the rainy season. These included 198 breeding lines in 5 advanced trials and 98 in 1 preliminary trial. A<br />

trial consisting of 5 advanced breeding lines tolerant to foliar diseases along with 2 susceptible checks<br />

(Fleur11 and ICGS11) was conducted to assess their yield and resistance to foliar diseases. Alpha lattice<br />

design with three replications was used in all the trials except the foliar disease trial which was a RCB. Plot<br />

sizes were of 4 rows and 4 m long<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Seed Supply: We supplied 63 trait-specific advanced breeding lines to partners in Mali (90 kg of 5 varieties<br />

to PLAN-Mali, 15 kg of three varieties to Millennium village project, and 9kg of 11 varieties to an export<br />

company YIRIWA); 200 gm each of 10 rosette resistant varieties to Cameroon, 50 seed each of 16 rosette<br />

resistant lines to Uganda and 100 kg of 8 varieties for researchers in <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. We also supplied 100 seeds<br />

of each of 256 groundnut germplasm reference set to IAR Nigeria on request. Yield trials: Promising high<br />

yielding lines with other attributes such as tolerance to foliar diseases were selected for further evaluation<br />

in regional trials. About 65 lines yielding significantly higher that the checks were selected. All the five<br />

lines (ICGV 01276 (score 2), ICGV 00068 (score 3), ICGV 00005 (score 3), ICGV 99029 (score 3), ICGV<br />

00064 (score 3) were resistant to early leaf spot, both on station and on-farm.<br />

B Ntare and F Waliyar<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong>: 3.2.3<br />

Three high yielding, well adapted sorghum varieties with at least one trait adding value to the harvest<br />

(stover quality, sweet juicy stems, brewing quality) identified for dissemination to farmers in two countries<br />

in WCA<br />

At least 15 new sweet sorghum cultivars of different origins, three experimental sweet sorghum lines<br />

selected in 2009 and five hybrids evaluated in replicated trials<br />

Rationale<br />

In order to develop a value chain strategy for ethanol production from sweet sorghum, adapted to mostly<br />

subsistence production systems in Mali, it is necessary to first generate knowledge about the production<br />

potential of internationally existing grain-fuel sweet sorghum varieties in the Sudanian and north-sudanian<br />

zone. This was done through the IFAD funded biofuel project “Harnessing water-use efficient bio-energy<br />

crops for enhancing livelihood opportunities of smallholder farmers in Asia, Africa and Latin America”<br />

(2008 – <strong>2010</strong>), in Mali in collaboration with IER. The aim is to identify cultivars which have high sugar<br />

yields but also provide animal fodder and acceptable grain quality and yield.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

During <strong>2010</strong> three activities were carried out in order to identify promising cultivars for either use as<br />

parents in breeding programs or directly for production by users in Mali.<br />

148


(1) A series of potential new sweet sorghum varieties and accessions provided by CIRAD (50 accessions<br />

with 20g seed with origins from West and Central Africa, East Africa and Central America and additional<br />

10 cultivars including control cultivars were tested in randomized field trials with two replications at<br />

Samanko and Cinzana.<br />

(2) The second year of the sweet sorghum trial with 40 entries (Malian local varieties, IS accessions and<br />

improved sweet sorghum breeding lines from <strong>ICRISAT</strong> India) was conducted with three replications at<br />

Sotuba with IER scientists.<br />

(3) A randomized field trial with two replications was carried out at two sites (Samanko, Sudanian zone and<br />

Cinzana, Sahelian zone) with the objective to evaluate the performance (brix, juice and grain yield/quality)<br />

of 34 progenies derived from 2009 selections at Cinzana (17 families) and Samanko (15 families). The<br />

progenies origin from the Patancheru Breeding program and were send by the team of De B. Reddy in 2009<br />

for evaluation under Malian climatic conditions.<br />

Results<br />

In the first field trial with 60 entries, about 70% of the varieties presented brix and juice values at a level<br />

that they could be classified as sweet sorghum varieties. However brix values of entries did not exceed<br />

16.2% at the Samanko station at physiological maturity. About 15 entries from Cameroon and Tchad were<br />

too late maturing for the Sudanian and Sahelian conditions. Several varieties with high biomass potential<br />

were identified, as well as one variety with interesting grain quality (vitreous and clean grain) for further<br />

use in the breeding program. Many entries had poor grain quality and poor panicle characteristics.<br />

At Sotuba, the plant stand was somewhat unfavorable in the 40 entry trial, however brix values were<br />

satisfying with up to 18%. Results are not yet analyzed.<br />

Preliminary results for the progeny trial show a trial mean for brix of 14% (6 – 19,5) at Samanko and 50ml<br />

per stem (10 – 120ml/stem) for juice volume. About seven progenies were selected at Samanko for further<br />

testing and purification, based on grain quality (vitrosity), gain mold resistance, grain color, panicle size,<br />

biomass, juice yield and brix values.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

At least 40 F2 families derived from sweet sorghum crosses conducted with a minimum of 400 plants per<br />

F2<br />

Rational<br />

To create the base materials for selection for locally adapted sweet sorghum genotypes with acceptable<br />

grain quality, wide crosses between different stem and grain types are being evaluated.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Selection in 32 F2 families was carried out in Samanko and Cinzana. F2 families were either derived from<br />

crosses between sweet sorghum (bicolor) x sweet sorghum (caudatum) or sweet sorghum (caudatum) x<br />

grain sorghum (caudatum or guinea).<br />

Results<br />

Results showed few plants with the desired traits (sweetness of stem, juiciness, panicle and grain quality,<br />

biomass). At Samanko about 52 F2 and at Cinzana about 15 F2 plants were selected which presented an<br />

interesting diversity of plant types, differing in sweetness and juiciness and cycle duration. A few<br />

interesting long-cycle plants were selected involving the parent IS15401 (Soumalemba) which showed<br />

sweet juicy stems, acceptable grain quality and resistance to head bug and end of season drought. Most of<br />

the late maturing plants had very poor grain set due to head bug damage.<br />

149


Conclusions<br />

Some progress for grain quality seems to be possible (guinea type of grain combined with sweet stems).<br />

But in order to progress with these trait combinations, numbers of lines in the early segregating generations<br />

have to be increased.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

New sweet sorghum diversity created; at least 10 crosses between diverse sweet sorghum cultivars made<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Six sweet sorghum F2 families (caudatum or bicolor/caudatum) were crossed with three different local<br />

guinea landraces with favorable grain quality and biomass traits to improve grain quality and biomass<br />

production in the progenies.<br />

Result<br />

Au total 256 successful crosses from 18 couples were performed during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season through<br />

hand emasculation.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Awareness for sweet sorghum production of main stakeholders in Mali improved: at least 5 sweet sorghum<br />

varieties tested on-farm, at least one workshop/exposure visit conducted<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Sweet sorghum variety tests were conducted in three zones with three different local partners in Mali. Six<br />

to 10 varieties (sweet sorghum elite lines from Patancheru, local sweet sorghum varieties and germplasm<br />

lines) were tested with about 6 farmers in randomized trials with two replications in each of the sites.<br />

Partners were: NGO AMEDD in Koutiala conducting trials in 6 different sites (Sudanian zone); the state<br />

agricultural program in the Segou region (Sahelian zone), four tests in one village and the private enterprise<br />

“Mali Biocarburant” (biodiesel from Jatropha) in Koulikoro (Sudanian zone) which conducted tests at six<br />

sites with six entries. Participatory evaluation workshops were conducted with AMEDD in the Koutiala<br />

region and with IER and “office riz” in the Segou region with about 20 farmers per trial.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Preliminary results received from the “Office riz” partners indicate that grain quality of early caudatum<br />

sweet sorghum lines and IS accessions were accepted. Due to less frequent rainfall in this region, grain<br />

mold was not a major issue in the on-farm trials. Biomass production in trials was favourable, however<br />

they were all conducted on fertile land and received standard dose of mineral fertiliser. A detailed analysis<br />

of the collected data is in progress.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Three experimental sweet sorghum varieties with >15% brix, >20t/ha fresh stalk yield and acceptable<br />

grain yield (>1.5t/ha) identified<br />

Several IS lines (e.g., 23525, 23566, 23541), one sorghum line of the CIRAD collection and two improved<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> sweet sorghum lines (ICSR 93034 and NTJ2) have been well appreciated by farmers in on-farm<br />

trials in the Segou. Three advanced progenies from the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> breeding program have also been tested at<br />

two on-station sites for further confirmation. A complete analysis of data of the <strong>2010</strong> trials and combined<br />

with results from previous years need to be performed to confirm the varieties.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

150


Management options identified for improved juice and sugar production in sweet sorghum with a focus on<br />

planting densities (field trials on station)<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

For testing sweet sorghum management options, a split-split-plot trial with three replications was sown and<br />

evaluated at the Samanko station with the objective to analyze the performance of juice production at three<br />

harvest dates at and after physiological maturity (PM) (PM, PM+15, PM+25 days) with two fertility levels<br />

(0 fertilizer application and 200 kg DAP/ha) and six varieties (similar growing cycle, different variety<br />

types):<br />

F221: local sweet sorghum landrace (Mali)<br />

00-SB-F5DT-427: sweet sorghum IER improved line<br />

ICSR 93034: sweet sorghum improved line from Patancheru breeding program.<br />

IS 23566: guinea-caudatum germplasm accession<br />

IS 23541: guinea-caudatum germplasm accession<br />

104 GRD: sweet sorghum improved line from Patancheru breeding program.<br />

Results<br />

The trial was conducted for the second year. Compared to 2009 the trial was conducted on a less fertile<br />

field in order to have more differences between fertilized and the non-fertilized treatments. In 2009 the<br />

fertility treatment had no effect on sugar levels in the juice (Table 1). In <strong>2010</strong> the mean Brix values are<br />

relatively low, between 9 and 17%, with a trial mean of 13%. Observations and data entry are still ongoing.<br />

Table 1: Mean brix values in different treatment in 2009 management trial<br />

Factors Treatment %brix<br />

Mean MIN MAX<br />

6-variety F221 13,75 12 16<br />

00-SB-F5DT-427 13,72 11 16<br />

ICSR 93034 15,46 11 19<br />

IS 23566 16,06 14 18<br />

IS 23541 15,44 14 17<br />

104 GRD 16,33 14 18<br />

2 fertilizations Non-fertilized 15,11 11 18<br />

200 kg DAP/ha 15,14 12 19<br />

3-harvest dates pm 14,26 11 18<br />

pm+15 15,01 12 18<br />

pm+25 16,11 13 19<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Release of sorghum variety with adaptation to low P conditions and high Fe concentration adapted to the<br />

Sudanian zone<br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum in Western and Central Africa is cultivated extensively on soils with low available phosphorous<br />

and with limited or no fertilization. Varieties that are better adapted to low-P soils could produce higher<br />

and more stable yields.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

A landrace variety “Doua-G” from Mali was identified to have superior performance under low-P<br />

available production conditions (see “Identification of germplasm” below). The registration document for<br />

this variety under the name of “Douaje” was submitted for inclusion in Variety Catalogue Mali in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Foundation seed of Doua-G was produced in an isolation block at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Fred Rattunde<br />

151


Identification of sorghum germplasm with adaptation to low P and Sahelian zone conditions<br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum germplasm with superior adaptation to low P needs to be identified to serve directly as varieties<br />

for adoption as well as source material for breeding purposes. Understanding the nature of genotype x<br />

environment interaction for grain yield under low-P conditions is necessary to formulate effective testing<br />

and breeding procedures.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The phenotyping of a Sudanian-zone sorghum panel of 70 varieties for adaptation to P-limited conditions<br />

was conducted under –P and +P fertilization at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko from 2006 to <strong>2010</strong> and at IER-<br />

Kolombada from 2006 to 2009. These evaluations provide a unique data base for analysis of genetic<br />

diversity and genotype x environment interaction for P-Adaptation over 5 years in 18 environments.<br />

Phenotyping of a Sahelian-zone sorghum panel of 80 varieties for adaptation to low-P was initiated in <strong>2010</strong><br />

with trials conducted at IER-Bema, ISRA-Bambey, INRAN-Konni, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko and <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-<br />

Sadore.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The –P trials had substantially lower grain yield, shorter plant heights and delayed flowering relative to +P<br />

trials, indicating that the P availability differed strongly between –P and +P. Genetic variation for grain<br />

yield over eight low-P environments of the Sudanian panel was highly significant and varietal differences<br />

were high heritability. Selection for yield under low-P conditions therefore can be effective. Genotype x<br />

environment interaction within the eight low-P environments was significant but only moderate in<br />

magnitude relative to genotype main effects. Date of sowing and environmental yield level explained very<br />

little of the GxE interaction. Therefore there is apparently no need to target specific low-P environments<br />

for germplasm or progeny evaluations for yield under P limited conditions. Total rainfall accounted for<br />

nearly half of the GxE interactions under low-P.<br />

Analysis over low- and high-P levels indicated that genotype x P level was significant but explained only a<br />

small portion of the total GxE interactions. Plotting entry yields under low-P versus entry yields under<br />

high-P using REML blups standardized to mean=0.0, std. dev.=1.0, revealed that only very few entries<br />

deviated markedly from the 1:1 line. Thus it appears that most all of the West African sorghum varieties<br />

tested express a basic level of adaptation to low-P conditions, despite their diversity for genetic background.<br />

Only IS 15401 and NafalenP6 showed considerably superior yields under low-P relative to under high-P<br />

conditions.<br />

Selection for yield under low-P conditions can be effective. Varieties IS 15401 and NafalenP6 should be<br />

further investigated for their adaptation mechanism(s). Indirect selection for yield under low-P conditions<br />

may be possible based on yield performance in more favorable P environments for W. African Sudanian<br />

sorghums. However, low-P yield testing is required to identify particularly superior low-P adapted<br />

germplasm.<br />

Fred Rattunde, Eva Weltzien and Willmar Leiser<br />

Data analysis of multi-year and multi-location trials from Mali to identify new varieties for release<br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum production conditions are diverse and varietal performance over the range of soils, weed management,<br />

sowing dates, and rainfall conditions can only be effectively assessed with more extensive on-farm testing to<br />

sample this diversity. On-farm validation of on-station varietal response to low-P availability is specifically<br />

needed.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Large-scale multi-location trials were conducted with a wide range of farmer organizations, and other<br />

development partners in Mali, Burkina Faso and Nigeria in <strong>2010</strong>. During <strong>2010</strong> these trials were largely<br />

152


conducted as split-plot trials with the main plots being agronomic practice, designed with the farmers in each<br />

village, and subplots of 3 to 5 test varieties. Partners were trained in this process.<br />

A structured evaluation of eight varieties identified to have contrasting low-P adaptation from on-station low-P<br />

phenotyping was conducted both on-station and on-farm in <strong>2010</strong>. The trials at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Samanko were<br />

conducted under +P and –P conditions with early and later sowing dates and four replicates. On-farm trials were<br />

conducted as two replicate split plot trials with P level as main plot and variety as subplot. These trials were<br />

conducted by 24 farmers, involving 4 farmers per village, and 3 villages in both the Mande and the Dioila zones.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> data from farmer-managed test-kits trials were entered into a newly established database.<br />

Older data are presently being added to the database. Data were assembled for the release of variety DOUAJE in<br />

Mali. In Burkina Faso an additional season of trials was required under the new seed regulations to complete the<br />

release procedure. The trials were conducted in <strong>2010</strong> are presently being analysed.<br />

Eva Weltzien and Fred Rattunde<br />

Develop recurrent selection schemes for implementation with NARS and FOs in the northern Sudanian<br />

zone (in collaboration with CIRAD FFEM 2/HOPE project)<br />

Rationale<br />

The mutual objective of the Agrobiodiversity (FFEM2)and HOPE projects in the Tominian region of Mali<br />

is to start a recurrent selection program so as to develop varieties responding to the harsh climate and<br />

production objectives of farmers living in that region. Base populations developed under a previous IFAD<br />

(PROMISO) project are being used as a source of diversity to kick start a breeding program.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Protocols have been developed to start a recurrent selection scheme in the region of Tominian in four<br />

villages targeted by the Agrobiodiversity project (CIRAD/IER/<strong>ICRISAT</strong>) and the HOPE project. The aim<br />

was to conduct F2 populations derived from crosses between diverse guinea populations and landrace<br />

varieties in farmer fields for a first cycle of mass selection, and to subsequently select materials for the<br />

development of breeding lines.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

During the aforementioned October workshop in Koutiala, participants were informed of how to create<br />

diversity through crosses between diverse varieties. Also discussed and illustrated with the help of posters<br />

were the methods behind the use of broad-based populations for variety development. . Workshop<br />

participants further learned about priority-setting and target conditions for selection.<br />

Conclusions<br />

If recurrent selection with NARS and FOs is to be implemented, training has to be reinforced, specifically<br />

in regard to choosing farmers’ fields as selection sites and selection methods in segregating materials.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke, Eva Weltzien<br />

Multi-location variety trials in farmers’ fields in three regions of Mali (FFEM project)<br />

Rationale<br />

The objective of the Agrobiodiversity project is to enhance sorghum biodiversity through the diffusion of<br />

new and diverse varietal options to farmers. The project offers the possibility to test and diffuse existing<br />

experimental varieties, bred by the <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER programs, in new zones of intervention, such as Sikasso<br />

and Koutiala.<br />

153


Materials and Methods<br />

Varieties derived from the <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER and the CIRAD/INERA breeding programs were incorporated<br />

into variety trials in three regions of Mali (Tominian, Koutiala, Sikasso). These included improved<br />

varieties, landraces, and breeding lines at the end of the selection process. Two sweet sorghum varieties<br />

were also brought into the tests. Five to ten varieties were used in “preliminary tests” containing 32<br />

varieties, which were tested in two villages per zone, with two farmers per village (2 replications per<br />

farmer). One to three varieties were used in “multilocation tests” that comprised 6 varieties tested by ten<br />

farmers in the same two villages per zone.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Although results are not yet available, preliminary results from the Sikasso region indicate that farmers<br />

have shown interest in two varieties contributed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/IER: DouaG (purified local variety) and<br />

IS23566 (sweet sorghum accession) .<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Target 2011: 3.2.1<br />

At least two new breeding populations of groundnut with enhanced multiple attributes available for testing<br />

and selection by NARS<br />

Rationale<br />

We developed new breeding populations to combine new sources of sources of disease resistance and<br />

drought tolerance to start marker assisted selection for the future, to provide training opportunities for<br />

breeders.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Phenotypic data from the reference set of 268 groundnut germplasm lines evaluated for early leaf spot<br />

(ELS) resistance, yield, harvest index (HI) and transpiration efficiency (TE) in different trials conducted at<br />

Samanko were analyzed. From this set new sources of resistance to foliar diseases were identified and used<br />

to generate new F2 populations. However in order to identify stable sources of resistance to ELS with<br />

consistent high TE across locations the data needs to be analysed jointly with evaluation data from other<br />

sites (Malawi and Tanzania, for ELS, and TE from India and Niger). The identified new sources of ELS<br />

and TE are being used to develop populations for marker assisted selection for these traits.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

F 1 seeds of 15 crosses made in the previous offseason were sown to determine their hybridity. A total of 40<br />

new three-way crosses involving farmer-preferred varieties and sources of resistance to early leaf spot (ICG<br />

7878) and rosette (ICIAR 19 BT) were made. Fifty nine (59) F 2:3 populations involving the most popular<br />

varieties in West Africa and sources of resistance to foliar, diseases, aflatoxin contamination and rosette<br />

were advanced to the next generation. Population size varied from 200 to 800 plants per population. Single<br />

plants and bulks were selected. Five of these populations involving a stable source of ELS resistance (ICG<br />

7878) crossed with the most popular varieties (55-437, 47-10, ICGV 86124 and Fleur 11) are being<br />

advanced through single seed descent (SSD) during the post-rainy season (Nov- April) to produce F 5:6<br />

RILS for phenotyping in 2011 crop season (June-October)<br />

Conclusion: The stage is set for developing populations to validate the QTLs for Marker assisted breeding<br />

and shows a clear linkage between TLI and TLII projects.<br />

B Ntare<br />

Target 2011: 3.2.2<br />

Improved cycle of at least one sorghum broad-based population produced by random-mating superior<br />

progenies<br />

154


Conduct mass selection among S0 plants in an existing broad-based guinea population adapted to the<br />

north Sudanian climatic zone<br />

Rationale<br />

The shared objective of the “Agrobiodiversity” project and the HOPE project in the Tominian region in<br />

Mali is to start a recurrent selection program in order to develop varieties responding to the harsh climate<br />

conditions and the specific production objectives of farmers in the region. Base populations, which were<br />

developed under a previous IFAD (PROMISO) project, were used as a source of diversity to start a<br />

breeding program. Further crossing activities were started in order to respond to a demand from farmers<br />

from the UACT farmer organisation, to reduce the growing cycle (shorter) of a popular landrace (Ariho).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Eight F2 populations derived from crosses between broad based guinea populations and landrace varieties<br />

were sown in farmers’ fields in the Tominian region (Sahelian zone of Mali) in order to start a recurrent<br />

selection program with farmers in collaboration with IER the NGO AMEDD and the UACT farmer<br />

organization. The populations were sown in three villages with four farmers. Each farmer conducted a bloc<br />

containing four F2 populations sown in 10 rows of 10m.<br />

The landrace “Ariho” was crossed with a short cycle farmer preferred variety (CSM63) and an early<br />

guinea-caudatum population (PSR08) from the CIRAD/INERA breeding program in Burkina Faso by hand<br />

emasculation at the Samanko station.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Farmers’ selected the best panicles in the populations. Due to late sowing date and difficult soil conditions<br />

and water stagnation only 50 panicles will be further tested. The majority (about 30 panicles per<br />

populations) will be bulked by population and used to reselect the populations for further farmers’ selection<br />

in 2011.<br />

F1 seed of 43 progenies involving the Ariho variety was harvested and will be advanced to the F2<br />

generation in the <strong>2010</strong>/11 off-season. F2 populations will serve as base population for a participatory<br />

variety development program for the region.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

Cycle 1-bulk random mated of diversified dwarf sorghum population for the Sudanian zone<br />

Rationale<br />

Past research on photoperiod sensitive sorghums for the Sudanain zone has shown the advantages of short<br />

plant height, in view of improving harvest index, as well as stover quality. The available breeding material<br />

with short height and photoperiod sensitivity had been diversified by crossing it with interracial breeding<br />

material from IER, with new dwarf selections from the Burkina Faso guinea race populations. The aim of<br />

the diversification was to improve panicle exertion from the flagleaf sheath, improve glume opening, grain<br />

yield potential and adaptation to the northern Sudanian zone.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The crosses had been made using the male-sterile plants of the selected dwarf guinea parent line, and from<br />

the Burkina Population. The resulting F1’s were randommated and seed increased, by groups of crosses.<br />

During the following rainy season, farmers received bulks of the random-mated populations or subpopulations.<br />

Farmer selected preferred individual plants, mostly from fertile plants, i.e. they were mostly -1<br />

progenies. With the IER sorghum breeders we constituted S1-nurseries for a grow out by groups of farmers<br />

from the same villages preferably during the <strong>2010</strong> season. All S1-progenies (approx 1100) were also grown<br />

at the Samanko research station in the 2009 rainy season. Single plant selections, mostly with short height<br />

were made on-station as well as on-farm. The following rainy season (<strong>2010</strong>), all the 100 short-internode<br />

and 28 intermediate inter-node S2-progenies were tested in multiplication trials, in sets of 60 testrows per<br />

farmer site. Together with the McKnight Foundation supported Statistical Support Services we supported<br />

155


IER in the development of a trial design, using incomplete blocks, so that individual farmers did not have<br />

to test the whole set of 100 progenies under evaluation. A total of 34 farmers across three different areas in<br />

Mali, in the Sudanian zone grew these progeny trials during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. IER partners collected<br />

data for all sites, and harvested those sites that were sufficiently uniform in terms of plant stand and general<br />

growth to yield interpretable data. The full sets of progenies were also evaluated in two on-station trials<br />

under high and low soil P availability conditions.<br />

The full set of lines was then grown in October <strong>2010</strong>. Selections were made based on the evaluation of<br />

research station data, to choose entries for random mating the fist improved cycle bulk of this new<br />

population. Crosses were made using male-sterile segregants in the selected lines as females.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The 2009 grow-out at the Samanko research station was late sown, and severely affected by late rains. The<br />

selection this focused largely on grain, glume and panicle traits that contribute to reduced grain mold<br />

incidence, and reduced grain insect attacks. Short interned length, panicle exertion form the sheath, and<br />

panicle size were other important selection criteria. Overall the S2 –lines performed well for these traits,<br />

and thus selection for productivity measures was meaningful at this stage.<br />

The two stage selection procedure clearly offered the opportunity to work with very large numbers of<br />

progenies in the initial stage. This allowed the farmers and the breeders to identify lines, which had a good<br />

chance to meet the criteria for adaptation and use required, while maintaining diversity for productivity<br />

related traits. More selection for variety development, as well as possible a population bulk for specific<br />

zones of adaptation will be made during the 2011 rainy season, after evaluating the multilocation results<br />

fully.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The experiences with the two stage selection procedure have been generally positive. The assessment of<br />

potential genetic gains remains to be done, as well as the assessments of selection differentials under<br />

specific testing conditions. We expect to continue using this method for the improvement of broad based<br />

breeding populations.<br />

Fred Rattunde, Eva Weltzien and Kirsten vom Brocke<br />

New base population with good adaptation to low P conditions, and Al toxicity<br />

Rational<br />

In view of the fact that gene markers for specific alleles of eth ALT-SB locus are becoming available, and new<br />

results that link the phosphorus efficiency QTL found in rice, to the ALT-SB locus, we decided, with inputs<br />

from EMBRAPA and GCP, to build –up a sorghum population with good adaptation to low – P availability, as<br />

well as Al –tolerance, as assessed in multi-year field trials in Mali.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

We intermated varieties and lines selected for their superior adaptation to low P conditions and Al toxicity with<br />

the lines from the diversified guinea dwarf population segregating for male-sterility during and 2009/<strong>2010</strong> offseason.<br />

The bulked F1-seed from these crosses for each donor parent were selfed during the rainy season. We<br />

used an early sowing under cages, to reduce the day length, to achieve earlier flowering and maturity. We could<br />

thus sow large F2 populations in the late October off-season, without cages, for a second random mating, using<br />

the male-sterile plants segregating in the bulks as females. Crossing is underway for the second random mating.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

So far the crossing plans have worked well, and the population will be ready for marker assisted selection for<br />

increasing the frequency of the ALT and P-efficiency alleles, once the markers become available.<br />

Fred Rattunde and Eva Weltzien<br />

156


Develop set of backcross populations to facilitate nested association mapping of traits related to adaptation to<br />

the southern Sudanian zone of adaptation<br />

Rational<br />

As marker assessments are becoming less costly, than field evaluations it is essential that important adaptation<br />

traits, which tend to reduce effective gain from selection, could be addressed using marker-based selection tools.<br />

Thus, the breeder could expect the maximum possible gain for complex traits such as productivity, from<br />

expensive field trials.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

In collaboration with IER, and members of the GCP sorghum group, we selected a recurrent parent, the dwarf<br />

guinea race restorer, Lata and a set of 10 common donor lines, which IER will also cross with the recurrent<br />

parent chosen. In addition we chose another set of 10 donor parents, widening the range of germplasm to be<br />

explored for this mapping and selection study.<br />

During the 2009/<strong>2010</strong> off-season we made a complete set of crosses between the identified 20 donor parents and<br />

Lata, or a sisterline of Lata segregating for male sterility.<br />

Results<br />

During the rainy season we completed and succeeded in making sufficient backcrosses to have at least 150<br />

BC1F1 seeds for all 20 donor parents. Selected crosses have sown to advance the material to BC1F2, others will<br />

undergo selection in the BC1F1 generation during the rainy season.<br />

Eva Weltzien and Fred Rattunde<br />

Target 2011: 3.2.3<br />

At least 2 downy mildew resistant open pollinated varieties of pearl millet made available to partners with<br />

release relevant information<br />

Pearl millet open pollinated varieties resistant to downy mildew<br />

Rationale<br />

Downy mildew is a major pearl millet production constraint and it is essential that any newly developed<br />

cultivars show an acceptable level of quantitative resistance to this fungal disease.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

With the aim to finalize new open-pollinated experimental varieties, a final cycle of recurrent full-sib<br />

family selection for downy mildew resistance and performance was successfully conducted in a total of 8<br />

elite populations (at the INRAN station at Bengou/Tara (South of Niger, financed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> HOPE<br />

budget). Each population was also evaluated at a second site in HOPE partner countries (Table x).<br />

Table x. Elite pearl millet populations that underwent a final selection cycle in <strong>2010</strong><br />

# Target country Type of population N of FS tested<br />

at site 1/2<br />

Evaluation<br />

sites<br />

1 Nigeria PE05532 (“Super Sosat”) 132/102 Tara &<br />

Maiduguri<br />

2 Nigeria PE05684 78/54 Tara &<br />

Maiduguri<br />

3 Nigeria PE05984 (extra early) 162/144 Tara &<br />

Maiduguri<br />

157


4 Niger,<br />

Mali,<br />

Burkina<br />

5 Niger,<br />

Mali,<br />

Burkina<br />

6 Niger,<br />

Nigeria<br />

7 Niger,<br />

Nigeria<br />

PE05572 (wide<br />

adaptation)<br />

PE05539 (wide<br />

adaptation)<br />

SHLxKBH-C1Aguie<br />

SMC<br />

SHC2_KANDELA_SMS<br />

(women-selected)<br />

186/108 Tara &<br />

Cinzana<br />

132/186 Tara and<br />

Gampela<br />

216/246 Tara and<br />

Maradi<br />

228/258 Tara and<br />

Maradi<br />

8 Niger,<br />

Nigeria<br />

F8xM1-C2 PF_Sad 348/348 Tara and<br />

Maradi<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The FS trials were successfully completed and achieved reasonable repeatabilities at most sites for<br />

agronomically important traits. The FS population of PE05572 proved to be very susceptible to downy<br />

mildew at Cinzana and will require another selection cycle.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Best families of each population are being recombined in the off-season <strong>2010</strong>/11 to form the new<br />

experimental cultivars, which will be disseminated within HOPE. Another cycle of FS and/or S1 selection<br />

will be conducted in the PE05572 population.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann<br />

Target 2011: 3.2.4<br />

Refined adaptation maps for at least 10 sorghum and pearl millet varieties available for use by partners<br />

Rationale<br />

Refined adaptation maps are required to better target dissemination of improved cultivars beyond their sites<br />

of selection. Adaptation mapping is based on multi-location (GxE) trials, partially combining cultivars and<br />

natural resources management practices (GxExM). The results of these trials are also used to derive genetic<br />

parameters for adaptation modeling using APSIM or DSSAT crop growth models.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A multi-factorial on-station trial has been conducted at three sites in Niger involving 10 pearl millet<br />

cultivars and 16 soil fertilization options (4 levels of mineral fertilizer and 4 levels of organic fertilizer in<br />

all combinations). The on-station trial has been complemented by on-farm demonstrations involving each 8<br />

cultivars and three soil fertilization options at all HOPE sites in Niger. Data collection and analysis are still<br />

underway. Once completed, the results are expected to give a good insight into genotype x location x soil<br />

fertility interaction effects for elite pearl millet cultivars in Niger, and to identify the most promising and<br />

economic options for farmers (=IGNRM).<br />

A 102-entry pearl millet landrace trial was conducted within the frame of the BMZ abiotic stress project<br />

under low and high P conditions in Niger, Burkina Faso, Mali and Senegal.<br />

Furthermore, within the BMZ-CODEWA project, a 20 millet genotype x environment interaction trial was<br />

conducted for the third year along a climate gradient in Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso and Ghana, to move forward<br />

the varietal adaptation mapping, in cooperation with PS Traore (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Mali). To assess photoperiodic<br />

response to latitude differences, one millet and one sorghum 30-variety photo period sensitivity<br />

158


trial with 2 or 3 planting dates (depending on the location) were also conducted at Sadore, Samanko (Mali)<br />

and Wa (Ghana) (PhD study Aicha Sacko and PS Traore).<br />

For sorghum the results derived from the multi-country, multi-site farmer managed evaluation trails will be<br />

used to support any mapping efforts, especially also with results on specific pests and diseases.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Data collection and analysis of these trials are still underway.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Once data analysis is completed, the results are expected to give a good insight into genotype × location ×<br />

soil fertility interaction effects for a representative set of pearl millet cultivars, and into the effect of latitude<br />

on photoperiodic response (an important aspect with regard to adaptation to climate change, when agroecological<br />

zones in west Africa may move southwards). Genotypic data will be used in adaptation<br />

modelling from which new adaptation maps will be derived.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann, Pierre.S. Traore,<br />

Aicha Sacko and Eva Weltzien<br />

Target 2011: 3.2.5<br />

Understanding of dry land cereal pest dynamics enhanced for at least two priority species across WCA,<br />

and used in adaptive IGNRM research targeting at least two countries<br />

Assessing potential trap crops for the pearl millet stem borer<br />

After a 3 rd year of observations in a specific trial, Andropogon grass was definitely ruled out as a potential<br />

trap crop for millet stem borer MSB management (monitoring by a BSc student of the University of<br />

Niamey, Mr Amadou Idrissa, supervised by AR) (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Compared damage and infestation by MSB on millet and Andropogon grass at Sadoré<br />

(2008, 2009 & <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Year & parameter<br />

2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong><br />

Crop<br />

2008<br />

Bored<br />

stems (%)<br />

2009<br />

Bored<br />

stems (%)<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

Bored<br />

stems (%)<br />

No. MSB No/ MSB No. MSB<br />

larvae/stem larvae/stem larvae/stem<br />

Millet 81.7 a 67.6 a 78.1 a 1.8 a 1.5 a 3.1 a<br />

Andropogon grass 23.8 b 25.6 b 17.7 b 0 b 0 b 0 b<br />

Means followed by the same letter in a same column are not significantly different at P


Regarding the new trial to be conducted both at Sadore and on one INRAN station, the activity was<br />

satisfactorily implemented respectively as part of UAM student Amadou Idrissa’s internship and at the<br />

Doukoudoukou Seed Multiplication Center under HKK’S supervision. At both locations, a trial with 5<br />

treatments and 4 reps was planted, in plots of 12.8X12.8m. Millet cultivar was ICMV IS 99001; three<br />

treatments involved millet stems cut and placed on the fields respectively at harvest and every second<br />

month thereafter (namely at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the dry season), a fourth with<br />

stems left upright until the onset of the rains on the one hand, and the fifth with stems cut at harvest and<br />

removed from the fields (for off-season storage on traditional platforms).<br />

At harvest (resp. 06/10 & 02/12/10), observations were made on incidence of stem borers and head miners<br />

on two 1m² squares, while grain yield was recorded on both those squares and on the whole plots. Soil<br />

macrofauna observations were made on the same squares (down to a depth of 0.25m). Analysis of results is<br />

underway. Five soil sub-samples per plot were taken with cylinders (15 cm), then pooled for physicochemical<br />

analyses (see above).<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

At Sadoré, the whole field was homogenous since there were no significant differences in terms of yield<br />

(mean of 1 227 kg/ha for whole plots), while at Doukoudoukou, yield was barely the same (mean of 1 176<br />

kg/ha) but there were significant differences between “treatments to be”. Similarly, MHM incidence was<br />

high (mean of 80%) and evenly distributed across the field at Sadoré, while it was low (2%), with also<br />

significant differences between “treatments to be” at Doukoudoukou. Stem borer incidence was evenly<br />

distributed at both locations, but much higher at Sadoré than at Doukoudoukou (incidence of 66% vs 13%).<br />

This questions the relevance of having this additional site which has no comparative advantage with Sadoré<br />

(where an unexpectedly high MHM infestation was observed). The situation will be reassessed at the end of<br />

the dry season, when all the treatments are applied and a second evaluation of soil macrofauna is<br />

conducted. On the other hand, significant results are expected from Sadore trial given the unusually high<br />

MHM infestation (in addition to that of MSB) at that location.<br />

Studies backstopping MHM biological control were not realized either, which was also partly due to travel<br />

restrictions in Niger. However, the latter study will be conducted around Sadoré in early 2011, given high<br />

infestation by this pest in this (relatively safe) area during last cropping season.<br />

A Ratnadass and Hame Kadi Kadi<br />

Sorghum Midge (SM) Management<br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum midge is a devastating pest of sorghum in situations where not all sorghum flowers at the same<br />

time. There are regional differences in severity of the attacks. Rarely have efforts to manage midge<br />

infestation been made in West Africa.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Studies on sorghum midge resistance were realized, with two tests planted at the INRAN station of Konni,<br />

as part of UAM student Tankari Moussa’s internship. The 1 st test, planted in 2 DOS (9 & 23 July),<br />

consisted of 6 sorghum cultivars, either resistant to sorghum midge or controls, in RCBD with 4 reps. The<br />

second test consisted in 41 sorghum midge resistant cultivars of various origins and a local control, planted<br />

on 23 July in a RCBD with reps. The 1 st DOS of the 1 st test was hampered by poor plant stand due to<br />

massive seed removal by ants. Transplanting made it possible to have homogenous central lines for damage<br />

scoring (SMVS=sorghum midge visual score on a 1-9 rating scale), but not for yield measurement, which<br />

was therefore taken only on 2 nd DOS. Alike the millet trial at Doukoudoukou, monitoring of the tests at<br />

Konni INRAN station was also adversely affected by travel restrictions in Niger for security reasons. For<br />

instance, cv. Ripdahu could not be scored on the 2 nd DOS due to late maturity as compared to other<br />

cultivars. However, yield could be measured despite late harvest.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

In terms of midge resistance and grain yield, SSD35 (contributed by HKK, INRAN) and Ripdahu<br />

(contributed by Ms Mary Yeye, IAR, Nigerai) were found to be the best cultivars, while Yarruwa was<br />

completely ruled out as a resistant cultivar (it was actually the most susceptible).<br />

160


In the 2 nd trial, five cultivars had a midge score < 2 (on a 1-9 scale): Ripdahu (from IAR, Nigeria); SSD 35<br />

(from INRAN/Intsormil); CIR-1/OG2-3G-1P-M-M (from CIRAD), and MR # 22 X IS 8613/2/3/3/1-2 # 34<br />

& IS 15107 (from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru)(Fig.5). However, F test was not significant although there was a<br />

tendency at the P=0.10 level. These cultivars were multiplied at Sadoré during the <strong>2010</strong>-2011 off-season.<br />

Results of this 2 nd trial confirmed those of the 1 st , in terms of midge resistance of SSD35 and Ripdahu, and<br />

poor performance of Yarruwa.<br />

Studies on sorghum midge bioecology were the most seriously affected by travel restrictions since the<br />

application of some treatments on the trial at harvest, the survey at the farm level, requiring the presence<br />

and input of the supervisor, could not take place due to above-mentioned security reasons.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Studies on sorghum midge bioecology were the most seriously affected by travel restrictions since the<br />

application of some treatments on the trial at harvest, the survey at the farm level, requiring the presence<br />

and input of the supervisor, could not take place due to above-mentioned security reasons.<br />

Potential of trap crops for sorghum head-bug (Eurystylus) management was further investigated at both<br />

Konni and Sadoré, with the assistance of a Master Student of the University of Niamey, Mr Rabo<br />

Younoussou. New wild plants were identified as alternative hosts for 2 species of Eurystylus. Head-bug<br />

specimens form various host plants were collected for further genetic (µsatellite analysis) at Cirad-<br />

Montpellier.<br />

A Ratnadass and Hame Kadi Kadi<br />

Assessing effects of marker assisted transfer of Striga resistance on locally preferred sorghum cultivars<br />

Rationale<br />

Striga resistance is a trait that requires much effort and resources for its assessments. In recent years,<br />

QTL’s and closely linked markers associated with them had been identified for sorghum, to ease the<br />

transfer of Striga resistance into farmer preferred cultivars. National programs in Mali, Eritrea, Sudan and<br />

Kenya had transferred these QTLs into locally preferred varieties. The present study is being undertaken to<br />

validate the effectiveness of the QTL mediated transfer of Striga resistance.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

All selected backcross lines from the partners countries have been evaluated for the presence and absence<br />

of markers for the major Qtls indentified for Striga resistance in the mapping population. These lines were<br />

now evaluated in field trials with artificial Striga infestation in Samanko and at Sotuba during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

season.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Initial results indicate that the number of QTLs is not correlated with the level of resistance to Striga<br />

observed in the field trials. More detailed data analysis is required, before drawing firm conclusions<br />

Peter Muth, Fred Rattunde and Eva Weltzien<br />

Output target 2011: 3.2.6 Tools for large scale dissemination of integrated Striga management practices<br />

tested in at least 2 countries in WCA<br />

Development and evaluation of integrated Striga and soil fertility management for pearl millet in Mali<br />

using cluster-based farmer field schools<br />

Rationale<br />

Striga hermonthica and soil fertility are frequently mentioned by farmers as two main constraints to cereal<br />

production in the Sahel region of West Africa. An integrated Striga and soil fertility management (ISSFM)<br />

strategy that uses combinations of practical and simple control methods has high potential for success and<br />

application by farmers. However, ISSFM is knowledge-intensive and needs adaptation to the local farming<br />

system, and cropping conditions.<br />

161


Materials and Methods<br />

Cluster-based farmer field schools (CBFFS) for ISSFM were implemented in four townships in 2007 and<br />

2008 in the district of Tominian, Mali (Figure1). During farmer focus group interviews, local farmer<br />

practice (FP) for pearl millet cultivation was determined, different Striga control options were considered<br />

and subsequently, an ISSFM strategy was developed. This strategy consisted of application of organic<br />

fertiliser, microdose application of NPK fertilizer at sowing, intercropping of pearl millet with cowpea or<br />

groundnut, microdose application of urea at 4-6 weeks after sowing (WAS) and additional weeding at the<br />

start of Striga flowering (12-14 WAS). ISSFM was tested against FP under supervision of a facilitator and<br />

with regular interventions by scientists/specialists. For two consecutive years, yield of pearl millet grain,<br />

cowpea or groundnut grain and fodder and Striga seed bank was observed. A participatory evaluation and<br />

cost-benefit analysis of FP and ISSFM was performed with the farmers.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

ISSFM reduced emerged Striga and seed bank density, increased crop productivity and profitability in<br />

comparison to FP (Table 1). The availability and cost of fertilizers as well as difficulty of combining<br />

intercropping with a second weeding by animal drawn implements were indicated by farmers as potential<br />

bottlenecks to the adoption of all ISSFM control options in its current form. Preference was given to the<br />

options that did not require cash investment such as organic fertilizer, intercropping and additional weeding<br />

(Table 2). The cluster-based farmer field school proved very successful in stimulating not only<br />

technician/researcher-farmer knowledge exchange, but also farmer-farmer knowledge exchange.<br />

Conclusions<br />

It is essential to ensure that the necessary inputs for the ISSFM options are available in the local markets.<br />

There is a need to study and determine the impact of CBFFS on farmer knowledge and adoption of control<br />

options and ISSFM by farmer trainers, participants and non-participants within and outside intervention<br />

villages.<br />

Similar models of CBFFS were carried in the Sudanian zone, with sorghum in the Made region, as well as<br />

in Dioila cercle in Mali. The sites in Djenne and Mopti cerlce were continued for a second year. In<br />

Tominian cercle the farmer union conducted demonstration plots with the best practices identified during<br />

the CBFFS.<br />

Table 1. Partial costs, benefits and profits for FP and ISSFM for year 1 and 2 in the Segou region of<br />

Mali in the period 2007-2009<br />

Township Cost (€/ha) Benefits (€/ha) Profit (€/ha)<br />

Year 1 FP ISSFM FP ISSFM FP ISSFM<br />

4 CBFFS 126 213 93 429 -33 216<br />

(19 trials)<br />

SED 1.4*** 27.5*** 26.9***<br />

Year 2<br />

4 CBFFS 104 195 100 384 -4 190<br />

(19 trials)<br />

SED 1.6*** 23.2*** 23.7***<br />

*** Significantly different at P


Improves soil fertility on<br />

the long term<br />

Reduces S. hermonthica and<br />

it’s negative effect on pearl<br />

millet<br />

drought<br />

May increase weeds and Striga<br />

when manure is of a bad<br />

quality or if organic material is<br />

not properly composted<br />

May bring noxious insects and<br />

animals to the field (grubs,<br />

scorpions, snakes)<br />

2. Intercropping<br />

pearl millet and<br />

cowpea or<br />

groundnut<br />

3. Manual<br />

weeding of Striga<br />

at flowering<br />

4. Urea microdosing<br />

at booting<br />

stage pearl millet<br />

Can reduce the surface area<br />

cropped per person<br />

Allows for the harvest of<br />

two crops in the same field<br />

Conserves soil humidity and<br />

reduces S. hermonthica<br />

Suppresses excessive S.<br />

hermonthica development<br />

Improves efficiency of<br />

(organic) fertilizer applied<br />

Reduces S. hermonthica<br />

presence in the field and<br />

seed in the soil<br />

Allows for better pearl<br />

millet development in future<br />

years<br />

May improve grain filling<br />

of pearl millet within the<br />

season applied<br />

Improves pearl millet<br />

growth<br />

With soil humidity, reduces<br />

S. hermonthica emergence<br />

Reduces the negative effect<br />

of S. hermonthica<br />

Improves the effect of<br />

manure/compost on pearl<br />

millet<br />

Does not contain weed<br />

seeds, nor Striga seeds<br />

Sowing and especially weeding<br />

becomes more laborious<br />

Second weeding with an oxen<br />

plough becomes very<br />

difficult/impossible<br />

The option may not be<br />

effective if rains persist and S.<br />

hermonthica may regrow<br />

In combination with drought<br />

may damage the pearl millet<br />

crop<br />

No monetary costs<br />

Soil humidity<br />

Harvest of two<br />

crops<br />

No monetary costs<br />

Reduces Striga on<br />

long term<br />

Beneficial effect on<br />

crop growth in<br />

combination with<br />

manure or compost<br />

5. NPK microdosing<br />

on pearl<br />

millet at sowing<br />

Favours early pearl millet<br />

development<br />

Can reduce Striga<br />

Concentrated, less volume<br />

and work than organic<br />

fertilizer, can be applied to<br />

larger area<br />

Does not contain weed<br />

seeds, nor Striga seeds<br />

With drought, may damage<br />

pearl millet<br />

The cost and availability of<br />

fertilizer at sowing<br />

Has to be applied at the right<br />

moment, place and quantity<br />

(difficult to apply)<br />

No cash at sowing<br />

Tom van Mourik<br />

163


Output 3: Crop management, Aspergillus flavus resistant groundnut varieties and post-harvest<br />

technologies to reduce aflatoxin contamination in food and feed products, as well as micronutrient rich<br />

cereal varieties and processing techniques to improve bio-availability developed, tested and made<br />

available to partners with new knowledge in the SAT of WCA<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong><br />

3.3.2 ELISA testing lab set up at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Bamako<br />

Rationale<br />

ELISA is a low cost effective method for aflatoxin diagnosis in groundnut. Having such a facility in each of<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> locations will enhance development of integrated management of aflatoxin contamination in<br />

groundnut.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

An ELISA kit has been installed in the pathology lab at Samanko. The necessary chemicals for analysis<br />

purchased and groundnut samples are routinely analyzed for aflatoxin contamination.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The aflatoxin lab at Samanko is operational. A minimum of 2000 samples is analyzed every month.<br />

Outside users such as YIRIWA company in Mali which exports groundnuts to Europe has requested<br />

services for pre-shipment analysis. This will bring in additional resources to enable the lab to have the<br />

necessary consumables including hardware.<br />

F Waliyar, AT Diallo and B Ntare<br />

Target 2011: 3.3.1<br />

2-3 farmer-and market preferred groundnut varieties tolerant to aflatoxin contamination identified for<br />

dissemination by at least three NARS in WCA<br />

Rationale<br />

Previous results have shown that host plant resistance in combination with best-bet agronomies post harvest<br />

practices can reduce aflatoxin contamination significantly.<br />

Material and methods<br />

On-station and farm trials were conducted in Mali (Samanko and Kolokani) and Niger (Sadore, Maradi and<br />

Bengou) to evaluate new breeding lines as well management practices to minimize aflatoxin contamination.<br />

On station trails were replicated and alpha lattice design with there replications used. For on farm trials,<br />

each farmer was considered a replication.<br />

On-station evaluation of advanced breeding lines: In Mali, 23 breeding lines along with 1 resistant (55-<br />

437) and 1 susceptible (JL 24) checks were evaluated for yield and aflatoxin contamination levels in<br />

replicated 5 x 5 alpha lattice design with 3 replications. Each plot was 8 m 2 .<br />

In Niger, the trials were conducted at Sadoré and Bengou research stations. In all the trials, 55-437 and<br />

JL24 were used as resistant and susceptible checks, respectively. At Sadore, 7 groundnut breeding lines<br />

were evaluated along with 55-437 and JL 24 as resistant and susceptible checks respectively. The<br />

experimental design was a 3 x 3 lattice design with 3 replications and a plot size of 8 m 2 . At Bengou<br />

INRAN station, 16 lines along with the checks were evaluated in a Randomize Block Design (RBD) with 3<br />

replications and plat size of 8 m 2 .<br />

Evaluation of Inter-specific derivatives: Thirty two (32) interspecific derivatives along with 2 (55-437,<br />

J11) and 2 susceptible (JL 24 and Fleur11) checks were tested at Samanko. The design was 6 x 6 lattice<br />

with 2 replications and the plot size was 8 m 2 .<br />

164


Results and Discussions<br />

In the Mali trails pod and haulm yields ranged from 1.70 to 3.10 t/ha and 2.67 to 5.0 t/ha, respectively.<br />

Aflatoxin contamination levels ranged from 0.1 to 294 ppb. Among the 23 breeding lines tested, 19 lines<br />

recorded aflatoxin level of < 5.0 ppb compared to the 294 ppb. For example 9 lines such as ICG 6222,<br />

ICG7 (0.1 ppb), ICGV 91324 (0.2 ppb), ICGV 02171 (0.4 ppb), ICGV 91283 (0.5 ppb), ICGV 91315 (0.6<br />

ppb), ICGV 91317 (1.0 ppb), ICV 93305 (1.0 ppb) and ICGV 03315 (1.2 ppb) recorded aflatoxin levels<br />

equal or less that 1.00ppb compared to the susceptible check JL24 with 294 ppb and the resistant check 55-<br />

437 with 1.2 ppb.<br />

At Sadore all the 7 advanced lines recorded aflatoxin contamination levels (0.00 to 1.10 ppb) compared to<br />

1.5 ppb for the resistant and 2.9ppb for the susceptible checks. Overall the level of contamination was low<br />

in this test.<br />

At Bengou, fourteen lines recorded less than 4ppb aflatoxin content compared to the 60.3 ppb by the<br />

susceptible check . Pod yields were in most part less than 1.5 t/ha.<br />

At Maradi INRAN station, 15 breeding lines and a local variety were evaluated in Randomized Block<br />

Design (RBD) with 3 replications. The level of contamination was low in all the lines with aflatoxin<br />

content ranging from 0.1 to 2.7 ppb compared to 14.4 ppb for the local variety. Lines such ICGV 91284,<br />

ICGV 91278 and ICGV 91315 produced more pods yields and haulm yields than the check 55-437.<br />

Twenty one (21) interspecific derivatives showed good levels of resistance (less than 4ppb). Five of these<br />

such as 4655-7 (0.07 ppb), 4373-15 (0.07 ppb), 4670-9 (0.08 ppb), 4897-17 (0.10 ppb), 4897-15 (0.12 ppb)<br />

recorded aflatoxin contents lower or equal to those of the 2 resistant checks 55-437 (0.08 ppb) and J11<br />

(0.12 ppb). Concerning the resistance to early leaf spot, 30 were resistant (scores ≤ 5) against 8 and 9 for<br />

55-437 and J11, respectively.<br />

At Sadoré 23 interspecific derivatives were evaluated in 5 x 5 lattice design with 3 replications. Seventeen<br />

were resistant with aflatoxin content ≤ 4 ppb. Four of these [4364- 3 (0.1 ppb), 4366-4 (0.1 ppb), 4897-17<br />

(0.2 ppb) and 18-03 (0.3 ppb)] were more resistant than the resistant check 55-437 which recorded 1.0 ppb.<br />

Pod and haulm yield were generally far below those of 55-437 and Fleur 11.<br />

Conclusion: The results indicated that 19 interspecific derivatives have good levels of resistance to<br />

aflatoxin contamination across locations (Mali and Niger). In particular, derivatives 4366-4, 4897-17 and<br />

4655-2 were superior to the resistant check 55-437.<br />

On-farm trials: Ten advanced breeding lines were evaluated by 10 farmers in Kolokani district in Mali.<br />

Each farmer evaluated 3 lines along with a local variety, 1 resistant (55-437) and 1 susceptible (JL 24)<br />

checks in an unbalanced design with 20 replications (20 farmers). Each plot was 100 m 2 . All the 10 lines<br />

recorded aflatoxin levels of less than 2.00 ppb. Among these, 5 lines; ICGV 91324 (0.0 ppb), ICGV 93305<br />

(0.1 ppb), ICGV 91317 (0.3 ppb), ICGV 91283 (0.3 ppb) and ICGV 91315 (0.4 ppb) were the most<br />

resistant compared to the resistant check 55-437 (0.5 ppb), local variety (9.1 ppb) and JL 24 (26.8ppb) the<br />

susceptible check . These 5 lines also produced reasonable pod and high haulm yields.<br />

In Niger the trials were conducted in Bengou and Maradi. At Bengou, 17 breeding lines were evaluated by<br />

36 farmers. Each farmer evaluated 4 breeding lines along with a local variety. An unbalanced block design<br />

with 36 replications (36 farmers) was utilized. The elementary plot was 64 m 2 . Overall the level of<br />

aflatoxin contamination was low in all the test material including the local check. Pod and haulm yields<br />

were also generally low.<br />

Several of these breeding lines including ICGV 91283, ICGV 91315, ICGV 91324 and ICGV 94379<br />

produced more pods and Haulm yields compared to local variety.<br />

At Maradi Farmers fields, 15 groundnuts advanced breeding lines and 33 farmers were selected. In each<br />

farmer, 5 advanced breeding lines + 1 resistant check (55-437) were tested. The Unbalanced Block design<br />

with 33 replications (33 farmers) was used. The plots sizes were 64 m 2 . Among 15 groundnuts advanced<br />

breeding lines, 10 lines were resistant with aflatoxin content less than 4 ppb. From these breeding lines, 5<br />

165


lines including ICGV 93305, ICGV 91283, ICGV 91317 and ICGV 91324 were more resistant than the<br />

resistant check 55-437 with the content varying from 0.3 ppb to 1.2 ppb against 1.5 ppb for 55-437. In<br />

general, the pods and haulm yields were very low. However some resistant varieties like ICGV 91278 and<br />

ICGV 91324 produced pods and haulm yields higher than resistant check 55-437.<br />

F Waliyar and B Ntare<br />

Target 2011: 3.3.2<br />

Mini-core Groundnut collection phenotyped for tolerance to A. flavus and aflatoxin contamination<br />

Rationale<br />

High levels of sources of resistance to aflatoxin contamination in groundnut are not common. Thus the<br />

need to search for more stable sources of resistance as this is the most cost effective way of managing the<br />

problem.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Thirty four (34) germplasm lines identified from the mini-core collection as resistant to aflatoxin<br />

contamination were included in this trial to confirm their resistance. These along with a resistant (55-437)<br />

and a susceptible (JL 24) checks were laid out in 6 x 6 lattice design with 3 replications. The elementary<br />

plots were 8 m 2 .<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Out of 34 lines, 31 recorded less than 4 ppb. Among these, 13 lines including ICG 14630 (0.0 ppb), ICG<br />

1415 (0.1 ppb), ICG 3584 (0.1 ppb), ICG 8490 (0.1 ppb) and ICG 332 (0.3 ppb) were more resistant than<br />

the resistant check 55-437 (1.1 ppb). These results were comparable to those obtained in the previous year.<br />

However pods and haulms yields of these lines were low in general.<br />

F Waliyar and B Ntare<br />

Target 2011: 3.3.3<br />

Two sorghum and pearl millet varieties with increased iron and zinc content, and low content of antinutritional<br />

factors available for cultivation in at least two countries in WCA<br />

Pearl millet Biofortification<br />

Rationale<br />

Pearl millet and sorghum contribute up to 80% of the daily calorie intake in rural regions of WCA.<br />

Therefore, pearl millet and sorghum cultivars with enhanced bioavailable Fe/Zn contents can largely<br />

contribute to improving nutrition of women and children in these regions.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two activities fall under this milestone:<br />

1. Screening of cultivars for high Fe/Zn contents.<br />

2. Transfer of high Fe/Zn contents into later flowering, longer panicle pearl millet types: In 2008, fullsib<br />

(FS) family selection trials were conducted with FS families derived from the crosses of GB8735<br />

x ICMV IS99001, GB8735 x ICMV IS92222 and GB8735 x ICMV IS89305. In these crosses,<br />

GB8735 is the donor for high Fe/Zn, but too early flowering and short panicles, so the high Fe/Zn<br />

was to be transferred into later flowering, longer panicle cultivars via recurrent selection. A two-step<br />

selection procedure was followed: selection for agronomic performance in the first step and selection<br />

for Fe/Zn contents in the second step. Fe/Zn analyses were performed at University of Hohenheim.<br />

While results were of very high quality, analyses took almost one year, therefore the delay in<br />

completing the selection cycle. Remnant seed of the best FS were to be recombined in the off-season<br />

of January <strong>2010</strong> to form new experimental cultivars with high Fe/Zn values and later flowering and<br />

longer panicles than GB8735.<br />

166


Results and Discussions<br />

1. Screening of cultivars for high Fe/Zn contents: Two high Fe/Zn pearl millet cultivars have been<br />

identified during previous projects (Harvest Plus, BMZ Mobilizing regional diversity) and are currently<br />

available for use: GB8735 and ICRI-Tabi. Within the EU-funded INSTAPA project, grains of GB8735 and<br />

ICRI-Tabi are currently used in Burkina Faso in a nutrition trial with children to assess its real effect on<br />

improving children nutrition (PhD study by Mme Fatoumata Hama). For this purpose 160 kg of ICRI-Tabi<br />

and 60 kg of GB8735 grain had been produced by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger in the rainy season <strong>2010</strong> and provided<br />

to Mme Fatoumata at Ouagadougou in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

2. Transfer of high Fe/Zn contents into later flowering, longer panicle pearl millet types: Six new<br />

experimental cultivars were attempted to be derived from the first selection cycle (one yield-based and one<br />

Fe/Zn-content-based for each of the three crossing populations as listed above), but the recombination of<br />

the materials did not yield sufficient seed because of severe irrigation problems in the off-season of January<br />

<strong>2010</strong> at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niamey. The seed needs to be multiplied further before a validation of the cultivars can<br />

begin. For the second selection cycle, 78 new Fs families were produced (low number again due to<br />

irrigation problems) among high Fe/Zn and above-average yielding FS families of the first selection cycle.<br />

These were tested at Sadore in the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>. Grain samples have been brought to University of<br />

Hohenheim for Fe/Zn analysis in January 2011 and results are awaited.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The long time required to get grain samples analyzed for Fe and Zn contents slows down progress of<br />

recurrent selection efforts. It would be better if such type of analyses could be done within the WCA<br />

region.<br />

Bettina IG Haussmann and Eva Weltzien<br />

Sorghum varieties with increased iron and zinc content identified for cultivation by women farmers<br />

Rationale<br />

There is a high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies particularly of Fe and Zn in rural Mali. Sorghum<br />

contributes to about 50% of Fe intake and about 70% of Zn intake for young children and mothers. Women<br />

farmers feed their children an extra meal from their own farms as such production and consumption of high<br />

Fe and Zn varieties by women farmers can contribute to improved nutritional status of women and children.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The trial involving 3 varieties were conducted by 31 women farmers in 15 villages. Two of four high Fe<br />

and Zn sorghum varieties previously identified in an on-station trial were provided by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Each<br />

farmer evaluated 2 high Fe/Zn varieties and a local variety. The 4 high Fe/Zn varieties were: Seguetana,<br />

Tieble, Nionifing and Yalama. One part of the plot was fertilized with Zn; the other left as a control.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Zn fertilization did not have an effect on both grain Fe and Zn contents. However, there were significant<br />

differences in the varieties regarding grain Fe and Zn contents with the improved varieties showing a<br />

significantly higher Fe and Zn contents compared to the local check varieties. There were also no<br />

interactions between the varieties and whether or not they were Zn fertilized. Zn fertilization has been<br />

showed to significantly increase the grain Zn content in wheat. However, the timing and method of Zn<br />

application have been shown to be limiting factors and could explain why no effect was seen in this trial.<br />

Foliar application of Zn has been shown to be more efficient than soil application of Zn. Other soil fertility<br />

factors might also explain why no effect was observed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Zn fertilization can increase grain Zn content. However, timing and mode of application of Zn fertilizer<br />

should be optimized to have positive results. In addition, exiting soil fertility management practices should<br />

be considered.<br />

Vera Lugutuah, Eva Weltzien and Fred Rattunde<br />

167


Output 4: High quality seed of adapted, released varieties of sorghum, pearl millet and groundnut<br />

accessible and affordable to small scale farmers in a timely manner through networks of agro-input<br />

dealers, seed entrepreneurs and breeders, both public and private by focusing on sustainable breeder<br />

and foundation seed production and creating an enabling agricultural environment for regional seed<br />

trade in West Africa<br />

Target <strong>2010</strong>: 3.4.1<br />

Improved agricultural enabling environment established for marketing high quality seed of sorghum, millet<br />

groundnut, etc. between West African Countries<br />

Rationale<br />

For countries to be able to trade seeds intraregionally, the Economic Community of the Western African<br />

States (ECOWAS) adopted in 2007 a technical agreement on three policies for the development of the seed<br />

industry in West Africa. These agreements comprise: i) a Regional Variety Release System, which allows<br />

varieties to be marketed in all 17 ECOWAS countries; ii) an ECOWAS Seed Certification System, which<br />

harmonizes all national seed standards into a single regional set of standards for the 11 most traded crop<br />

seeds; and iii) an accreditation system for seed laboratories and seed businesses to conduct seed<br />

certification activities.<br />

For countries to be able to legally adopt the regional agreements, modifications to existing norms reflecting<br />

the changes, must be enacted. Experience elsewhere shows that these changes may not occur simply by use<br />

of national efforts. They do require technical assistance and follow-up. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> WASA Seeds Project<br />

specialists participated in the development of both these regional and national seed regulations.<br />

The regional variety release system adopted is the nucleus of the seed trade harmonization agreements. The<br />

system needs to be established, software finalized, loaded and thoroughly tested before opening to private<br />

and public sector variety registration for regional marketing of their varieties. It is important that the<br />

national seed authority in charge with variety release process in all 17 countries is familiar and assisted<br />

with such hardware and software.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The analysis and modification of national seed laws are facilitated by WASA Seeds Project in collaboration<br />

with Iowa State University and the “Comité Inter-Etat de Lutte Contre la Sécheresse dans le Sahel”<br />

(ISU/CILSS) team through tabulation of existing regulations and matching them with the agreements. A<br />

seed regulatory monitoring working group (WG) comprised of the related government seed authorities and<br />

the local seed association was established in each of the referenced countries. The national focal points,<br />

with the support of ISU/CILSS, were tasked with setting up the WGs. These WGs reviewed and proposed<br />

the regulatory modification in a legally acceptable format, which were then reviewed by ISU/CILSS.<br />

Subsequently, the same WG took responsibility for follow-up with the appropriate authorities for approval.<br />

These WGs were neither demand-driven nor donor-pushed, but rather a proposed mechanism to ensure that<br />

the necessary modifications to the legislation/regulations take effect. The WGs, comprised of five people,<br />

are scheduled to meet three times, two days each time, at a mutually convenient location. The publication<br />

and distribution of the Harmonized Technical Seed Agreements was critical for keeping all stakeholders<br />

informed.<br />

For the implementation of the regional seed variety catalogue, a database application for variety registration<br />

in both English and French was developed and the software in CD-format was provided to ECOWAS<br />

regional office. The software includes application, DUS, VCU and management modules. IT survey for<br />

regional office was completed in March and survey was sent in July for national offices. Software and<br />

hardware specifications were developed and provided to regional office; DUS comparison module was<br />

developed and integrated with main database software. Software installation and training was provided to<br />

regional office (July 12 and 13, <strong>2010</strong>) and to national seed authority agents in Mali.<br />

168


Results and Discussions<br />

Following the regional Regulation (C/Reg.4/05/2008) on the harmonization of rules governing quality<br />

control, certification and marketing of seeds in the ECOWAS region, new seed laws of Mali and Ghana<br />

were developed and approved in <strong>2010</strong>. Burkina Faso and Niger have already completed most of the steps<br />

described above and other countries will be assisted following the same model.<br />

Ram Shetty, K. Kodio and E Lin<br />

Target 2011<br />

3.4.1 Improving the availability of breeder and foundation seed by NARS, other public sector and private<br />

sector entities<br />

Breeders and Foundation Seed production by NARS<br />

Rationale<br />

In West Africa, quality seed supply is a major constraint. When the Seeds Project (the<br />

Project) began in 2007, one of the initial findings in all six participating countries – Ghana,<br />

Mali, Niger and Nigeria-Burkina Faso and Senegal – was the poor quality of breeder seed coming from<br />

national agricultural research systems (NARS) and the almost complete absence of quality foundation seed<br />

production.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

In 2009, in Ghana, Mali, Niger and Nigeria, WASA-Seeds Project worked with the NARS in purifying<br />

breeder seed and jumpstarting the production of foundation seed. This work continued in <strong>2010</strong> in order to<br />

make sufficient stocks of high-quality foundation seed of improved varieties available for private seed<br />

companies/seed entrepreneurs. The foundation seeds produced in 2009 were distributed to seed producers<br />

and commercial seed companies (mostly in Nigeria) for the production of certified seeds to be marketed to<br />

farmers.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

The table 1 on next page presents the volume of seed produced per seed category and per crop in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Table 1: Volume of seeds produced in <strong>2010</strong> under WASA-SP assistance<br />

Seed<br />

category<br />

Commodity<br />

UNIT<br />

Country<br />

Burkina<br />

Faso<br />

Breeder seed Cowpea Kg 60 20 0 0 0 0 80<br />

Ghana<br />

Groundnuts Kg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Maize Kg 100 60 0 0 0 0 160<br />

Millet Kg 0 0 0 136 0 0 136<br />

Rice Kg 500 0 0 0 0 0 500<br />

Sorghum Kg 90 0 0 0 0 0 90<br />

vegetables Kg 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Mali<br />

Niger<br />

Nigeria<br />

Seneg 1 al<br />

Total<br />

Foundation<br />

seed<br />

Cowpea Kg 500 0 0 2 094 0 0 2 594<br />

Groundnuts Kg 0 0 0 5 0 0 5<br />

Maize Kg 3 000 0 0 214 0 0 3 214<br />

Millet Kg 0 0 0 36 267 38 000 0 74 267<br />

1 All foundation seeds commissioned with ISRA still under certification.<br />

169


Rice Kg 2 000 0 0 0 0 0 2 000<br />

Sorghum Kg 700 0 0 0 0 0 700<br />

Vegetables Kg 0 0 0 153 0 0 153<br />

Certified seed Cowpea Tons 0 0 7 5 0 0 12<br />

Groundnuts Tons 0 0 6 5 0 0 11<br />

Maize Tons 91 146 25 0 0 0 262<br />

Millet Tons 0 0 6 0 0 0 6<br />

Rice Tons 11 0 30 0 0 0 41<br />

Sorghum Tons 0 0 7 15 0 0 22<br />

Vegetables Kg 0 0 30 0 0 0 30<br />

Groundnut Foundation Seed<br />

SVR Shetty, K Kodjo and Edo Lin<br />

Rationale<br />

Lack of sufficient breeder and foundation seeds are a major bottle neck in the groundnut seed sector.<br />

Efforts are being made to augment those of NARS to produce foundation seed of the most popular varieties<br />

in Mali.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The activity involves supply of seed produced in the previous season on request and on-station production<br />

of breeder and foundation seed of popular varieties.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

At the beginning of the crop season, we distributed a total of 1475 kg of both breeder and foundation seed<br />

of six varieties on high demand to various users including projects, non-governmental organizations and<br />

seed companies. The quantities were as follows: 255 kg of 4 varieties to WASA-SP in Niger; 60 kg of one<br />

variety to COPRO-SEM, 50 kg of one variety to Agro Action Allemande; 150 kg of 3 varieties to<br />

Millennium Village project in Mali , 120 kg of one variety to the sorghum program; and 40 kg to a grain<br />

producers. During the crop season we produced 1580 kg of breeder seed (in shell) of 29 advanced breeding<br />

lines. For foundation seed, we produced 1281 kg of 7 varieties with quantities ranging from 55 to 730 kg<br />

per variety.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> remains the only source of breeder seed of groundnut in Mali. Efforts are under way in<br />

collaboration with WASA Seed Project to develop a business plan for the Foundation Seed Unit at IER in<br />

Mali for breeder and foundation seed.<br />

B Ntare<br />

Pearl Millet Foundation Seed<br />

Rationale<br />

Sufficient availability of foundation seed is a major requirement to enhance impact of new improved<br />

cultivars. Beyond seed production itself, it is important to establish new partnerships and to train new seed<br />

producers in foundation and certified seed production.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

1. Foundation seed of elite pearl millet cultivars is regularly produced in isolation plots at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger<br />

(Sadore station: one rainy season and two off-seasons) and partially also at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Mali.<br />

2. Furthermore, within the frame of the HOPE project, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger linked up with the private Alheri<br />

seed enterprise led by Issoufou Maizama at Doutchi. <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger provided 925 kg breeders seed<br />

170


covering three <strong>ICRISAT</strong> varieties (Sosat-C88: 500 kg for 100 ha; ICMV IS 89305: 300 kg for 60 ha;<br />

ICMV IS 94206: 125 kg for 25 ha) to Alheri.<br />

3. Three training courses in seed production were held in cooperation with WASA.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

1. In <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 9100 kg breeders or foundation seed covering 11 different pearl millet cultivars<br />

(ICMV IS 89305, ICMV IS 92222, ICMV IS 94206, ICMV IS 99001, GB 8735, SOSAT-C88, PE05539,<br />

PE05572, Mil de Siaka (PE0 5578-C2), SounaMau (PE08030), ICRI-Tabi) was available with the<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger millet breeding program. In addition to the seed mentioned, further seed of other new<br />

experimental cultivars is produced via manual sibbing, because of lack of further adequate isolation plots.<br />

2. The seed produced by the Alheri seed enterprise in cooperation with <strong>ICRISAT</strong> is currently being cleaned<br />

up, after which final production data will be available. The cooperation is expected to significantly enhance<br />

impact of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> cultivars in Niger. Parts of the seed produced by Alheri will be used in HOPE Minipacks<br />

in 2011.<br />

3. In cooperation with WASA (Paul Buckner) with co-financing by HOPE a total of 66 seed producers<br />

were trained in three two-day training courses held at Mayayi (targeting seed producers at Mayayi (ACH),<br />

Serkin Haoussa, Sae Saboa, El Colta (all Fuma Gaskiya), Keita (targeting farmers linked to ACH at Keita<br />

and Croix Rouge at Tahoua) and Sadore (with seed producers from Mooriben Tera, Falwel, Bokki, and<br />

Dantchiandou). It is planned to further cooperate with the most serious seed producers identified to enhance<br />

also foundation seed production, as <strong>ICRISAT</strong> alone cannot produce sufficient quantities of foundation seed<br />

for the whole WCA region.<br />

Conclusions<br />

To make seed production and marketing more efficient at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, it was suggested to the WA director to<br />

establish a seed unit at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger. A proposal needs to be developed in this regard.<br />

Bettina IG. Haussmann<br />

Sorghum Breeder and Foundation Seed Production, training for seed production<br />

Rationale<br />

Availability of breeders’ seed and foundation seed is critical for ensuring the production of certified seed.<br />

Progress with hybrid seed production is essential, to promote adoption.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Breeders seed and Foundation seed of varieties with low stocks, and of hybrid parents were produced in<br />

close collaboration with IER, and well trained farmers. On station 2 varieties were produced during the<br />

off-season, and two others during the rainy season. One variety, Tieble, was produced in collaboration with<br />

an experienced farmer.<br />

Training for seed production focused on producing hybrid seed. Interested producers in two zones of Mali,<br />

member of two different seed commercialization groups, were trained first in April, to assure that planning<br />

of crop allocation to fields could take hybrid sorghum seed production into account. Practical aspects of<br />

sowing the hybrid seed production ploys were explained during seed distribution. Training on ensuring<br />

good levels of pollination of the female plants, and the procedures for safe harvest were held during three<br />

one day courses, in Dioila, Siby and Bamako, for farmers and private seed enterprises.<br />

Certified seed of varieties was produced by 3 different farmers’ cooperatives, partially in arrangements<br />

with private sector seed companies, who have successfully marketed some of the varieties.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Seed certification is not finalized, thus quantities cannot yet be reported. Experiences with hybrid seed<br />

production were mostly positive, in s isolation distances were maintained by all producers, and the<br />

production fields were well managed. Nicking of the female and male parents was good, with the exception<br />

171


of one case of late sowing, where then the photoperiod sensitive male parents flowered before the<br />

photoperiod insensitive female parent.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In order to increase total see production, farmers will have to enter more contractual type arrangements,<br />

which will allow them to get credit for input purchase. Experiences of integrating hybrid seed production<br />

with grain production for food security have been positive. This will be pursued in further detail.<br />

Fred Rattunde, Abdoulaye Diallo, Mamourou Sidibe and Eva Weltzien<br />

Target 2011: 3.4.2<br />

Seed dissemination channels assessed in at least one country in WCA<br />

Effect of different farmers’ production strategies on the heterogeneity of seed grain of the commercial<br />

variety “Soumba” assessed. Continue the documentation of farmers practices to produce seed of the<br />

Soumba variety on-farm<br />

Rationale<br />

The IMAS project (CIRAD/IER/<strong>ICRISAT</strong>) analyses the resilience of seed systems and the effects of the<br />

introduction of new varietal diversity into the farming systems. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> is involved in the study in the<br />

Mandé and Dioila region and is especially interested on seed management aspects and diffusion involving<br />

varieties introduced into the study areas through participatory research and trials since 2003.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

In <strong>2010</strong> two field trials were conducted to examine the variability, and so the success of the different seed<br />

selection methods to keep an introduced, improved variety (Soumba) pure. For this purpose seed of the<br />

Soumba variety was collected from 6 farmers in Magnambougou (6 bulks from the farmers’ seed stock) in<br />

March 2009. In October 2009, 30 panicles have been randomly collected in the fields of the 6 farmers<br />

sown with the same Soumba seed stock (+on fields of two new farmers). The farmers all used different<br />

seed management methods to produce their seed. In <strong>2010</strong> two field experiments were carried out:<br />

The first field trial was the repetition of the 2009 Soumba field trial, containing eight entries, including the<br />

six Soumba seed stocks of farmers. The six entries were sown together with two control Soumba varieties<br />

of different origine (foundation seed/<strong>ICRISAT</strong> and certified seed/ULPS) in a randomized block design at<br />

the Samanko station at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> with five row plots and four replications under poor fertility conditions<br />

8low phosphor). The objective was to count off-types in the farmer seed stocks and measure agronomic<br />

performance.<br />

A second experiment was a nursery of panicle lines derived from the 30 panicles collected from the farmer<br />

fields. The objective of the nursery was to identify the number of off-types and to compare the results with<br />

heterogeneity levels analysed by microsatellite markers in the collected panicles.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

Results of the 2009 experiment and the number of off-types counted in the progenies of the 30 panicles of<br />

the different Soumba seed stocks are presented in Table 2. Data of the <strong>2010</strong> trial is being analyzed.<br />

Kirsten vom Brocke and Eva Weltzien<br />

172


MTP Project 4:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Producing more and better food from staple cereals (sorghum<br />

and millets) and legumes (groundnuts, chickpea and pigeonpea)<br />

at lower cost in the eastern and southern African (ESA) SAT<br />

through genetic improvement<br />

Mary A Mgonja<br />

Project summary<br />

Project 4 contributes to the overall goal of achieving sustainable food, nutrition and<br />

income security of farm families in ESA and is responding to CGIAR System Priorities<br />

i) 2A to increase yield and considering pro- poor traits (pests, diseases and Striga), ii) 2B abiotic<br />

stresses (drought) and (iii) 2C on nutritional quality of sorghum, pearl and finger millet through biofortification;<br />

and on food safety issues associated with aflatoxins in groundnut. The project has five<br />

outputs designed around the three Science Priority areas but linked with other SP and projects.<br />

Highlight of <strong>2010</strong> progress by outputs are provided below:<br />

Output: 4.1 Sustainable regional breeding networks that integrate conventional and<br />

biotechnology tools established and associated capacity building implemented.<br />

This output emphasizes on strengthening the efficiency of breeding and cultivar evaluation while<br />

conserving and making maximum use of the natural genetic resource base (linked to project 2). i)<br />

Regionally-based task networks integrate farmer participation and include regional evaluation teams<br />

across the ESA region and are focusing in addressing constraints on drought through sorghum and<br />

millet variety and hybrid evaluation, midge, sweet sorghum and on constraints expressed in the sub<br />

humid environments and on finger millet evaluation ii) Groundnut teams evaluated varieties for<br />

regional adaptation and capacity building focusing on Seed Technology and Crop Science iii) )<br />

pigeon pea team in Tanzania and Malawi that were supplied with high yielding early, medium and<br />

long duration genotypes for evaluation and seed increase resulted in the release of 4 varieties. iii) Desi<br />

and Kabuli chickpea genotypes with resistance to Fusarium wilt were availed for further evaluation in<br />

Kenya and Tanzania. Breeding networks emerge from collaborative development and implementation<br />

of regionally oriented projects such as Tropical Legume II and HOPE for dryland cereals.<br />

Output 4.2 Improved germplasm and parental lines of adaptable sorghum, pearl millet, pigeon<br />

pea, chickpea and groundnut that are resistant to chronic biotic stresses and meet end user<br />

preferences. Genetically diverse breeding populations were developed and advanced for sharing with<br />

partners for further selection e.g sorghum lines that are resistant to striga (developed using MAS),<br />

midge, stem borers and leaf diseases and bristled pearl millet varieties were developed and tested in<br />

Eritrea and Kenya. Hybrids and OPV sorghum , pearl millet and finger millet were tested in multilocation<br />

trials targeting diverse agro ecologies fro adaptation , and stability and mew test crosses<br />

evaluations were conducted to feed into the regional trials to provide researchers and farmers with<br />

more options. Genetic diversity was created for pigeonpeas and populations segregating for resistance<br />

to fusarium wilt were developed. Sources of groundnuts resistance to early and late leaf spots, rosette<br />

and aflatoxin contamination have been confirmed and the phenotyping and genotyping of pigeon pea<br />

and groundnuts was completed. Seed of various classes were produced for all the five crop. Capacity<br />

building was provided on need basis<br />

Output 4.3 New knowledge of the QTLs for the stay green and drought tolerance traits<br />

confirmed, specific abiotic stress tolerant varieties and associated knowledge and capacity<br />

development.<br />

Drought is considered to be the primary cause of yield reductions for crops in Sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

Early maturing varieties that escape terminal drought have been developed and introgression of Staygreen<br />

(Sg) into farmer varieties is going on as a mechanism to confer drought tolerance. Stay-green<br />

QTL from two <strong>ICRISAT</strong> donor parents (B35 and E36-1) were introgressed through MABC into 4<br />

farmer-preferred Ethiopian sorghum varieties (76T1#23, Meko, Gambella and Teshale and will be<br />

advanced BC3S2 in 2009. The phenotyping of improved lines with introgressed staygreen QTL from<br />

India planned for Ethiopia to evaluate the effect of the stay-green QTL in Africa was implemented in<br />

<strong>2010</strong> however data is yet to be received. For groundnuts, nuclear seed of 201 lines in Advanced to<br />

Elite trials in ESA were produced in quantities ranging from 5 – 80 kgs in Malawi, Mozambique and<br />

Tanzania. Approximately 10 tons breeder seed of 16 popular released varieties in the three countries<br />

was also produced in support of foundation/basic seed multiplications<br />

173


Output 4.4 Progress in knowledge and/or improved germplasm of nutritionally enhanced<br />

transgenic sorghum and biofortified germplasm with enhanced micronutrient levels available for<br />

evaluation. The deployment of transgenic sorghum is likely to be met by trepidation that gene flow<br />

will negatively impact the environment. . The consequence of the transgene movement will however<br />

depend on the nature of the transgenic trait. The hybrid fitness study demonstrated that hybrids between<br />

wild and cultivated sorghum could survive under natural conditions but may not necessarily have an<br />

advantage over wild sorghum. Analysis of variance for the agronomic data taken revealed highly<br />

significant differences for all the traits among the breeding types. Differences were noted between the<br />

cultivated parents (Cult x Cult) and the hybrids (Cult x Wild and Wild x Cult) and wild parents (Wild<br />

xWild). No significant differences were however noted between the wild parents; and the Wild x Cult<br />

hybrids, implying that at F 2 hybrids were not superior to the wild parents. These results are in<br />

agreement with earlier results from the same F3 populations grown in 2008/2009 and follows similar<br />

patterns as in the F1s and F2s earlier evaluated<br />

Output: 4.5 Technological options and knowledge to reduce groundnut aflatoxin contamination<br />

Aflatoxins contaminate groundnut and other agricultural commodities. Management is difficulty due<br />

to lack of awareness, environmental conditions and farming practices. Farmer Field Schools (FFS) are<br />

now successfully being used in ESA to promote aflatoxin management practices on farmers’ fields.<br />

Awareness of the problem is also easily discussed and understood using the informal learning nature of<br />

FFS. On-farm studies highlighted the role of good cultural practices like early planting and water<br />

management in the control of aflatoxin contamination. Resistant varieties have been identified from<br />

germplasm and elite trials and their their additional contribution through IGNRM packages<br />

documented. Finally, mapping of Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin contamination across districts in<br />

Malawi was completed.<br />

IPGs:<br />

• Breeding teams and breeding networks to address regional challenges,<br />

• Genetically diverse and improved germplasm, parental lines and varieties, new<br />

tools e.g. for aflatoxin diagnostics, traits discoveries and strengthened capacity.<br />

• Improved cereal and legume germplasm available for evaluation by collaborators ,<br />

• A platform with clear rules and regulations (SMTA) developed for germplasm exchange<br />

among the breeders in the collaborating countries<br />

Outcome:<br />

i) Partners in breeding networks share responsibilities and products<br />

ii) Partners have capacity to use and integrate new and more precise tools<br />

iii) Partners and farmers’ access to quality seed of improved high yielding and<br />

nutritious germplasm for further testing<br />

iv) partners and farmers have access to mycotoxin diagnostic tools and iv)<br />

improved knowledge on gene flow and GM deployment<br />

Impact:<br />

• Improved efficiency in breeding, better access to quality seed, nutritious and safe to use food,<br />

increased productivity and profitability and informed decision on environment management<br />

and biosafety policy<br />

• Improvement of biotechnology and conventional facilities in participating national programs<br />

and demonstrated the utility of inter-institutional research collaboration (at both regional and<br />

international levels)<br />

• Policy support for biotechnology<br />

• Farmers production and productivity will increase especially if the project links to project 1 on<br />

markets policy and institutions<br />

Output 4.1: Sustainable regional breeding networks that integrate conventional and<br />

biotechnology tools established and associated capacity building implemented<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.1: Three groups of task networks addressing the key constraints of drought and<br />

photoperiod response active in sharing improved germplasm regional<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved with elite lines available for sharing across countries in the region<br />

174


Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NARS in Kenya (KARI) and Tanzania (DRD)<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Drought is one of the major abiotic constraints to crop production and productivity worldwide.<br />

Hence, development of drought tolerant cultivars is one of the major objectives of crop breeding<br />

programs. To identify drought tolerant germplasm lines, a genotype-based reference set comprising<br />

384 accessions (http://www.generationcp.org), selected from composite collection (41 SSR loci data<br />

on 3372 accessions) is being evaluated for post-flowering drought tolerance under well-watered<br />

(WW) and water-stressed (WS) conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> sites and at NARS partners , Patancheru<br />

consecutively for two years during 2008-09 and 2009-<strong>2010</strong> postrainy season. As mentioned in the<br />

previous year’s report, the lines will be first classified into different phenological groups based on<br />

variation in days to 50% flowering. These subgroups will then be evaluated for post-flowering<br />

drought tolerance traits at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and other locations in the collaborating countries with the<br />

objective of identifying promising drought tolerant lines that are adaptable. The identified drought<br />

tolerant lines are already being shared with other national program partners like Ethiopia, Sudan,<br />

Tanzania and Eritrea. Photoperiodism is a trait that is required for sorghum adaptation to the areas<br />

with long season such as Tanzania, Mozambique and Zambia. Germplasm collections and evaluation<br />

made in Tanzania had 12 varieties that were shared with NARS in Mozambique and Zambia for<br />

further evaluation for direct use and or for use in crop improvement<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Generation Challenge Program (GCP) and HOPE<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.1: At least one medium and one long duration pigeonpea variety released in<br />

two countries of ESA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 % targets by release of three medium duration (two in Malawi and one in Kenya) and<br />

one long duration variety(in Kenya). Similarly, high yielding and fusarium wilt resistant farmer and<br />

market preferred medium and long duration genotypes are under National performance Trials (NPT) in<br />

Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi; Selian Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania; Ilonga Agricultural Research<br />

Institute-Tanzania; Chitedze Agricultural Research Station-Malawi; <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Lilongwe; Kenyan<br />

Agricultural Research Institute (Katumani)-Kenya; Leldet Seed Company-Kenya; Mozambique<br />

National Institute of Agricultural Research<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Long and medium duration varieties are highly popular among the smallholder farmers in ESA and<br />

there are definite niches to grow them. Long duration varieties are highly relevant for traditional maize<br />

based cropping systems and high altitude areas with relatively longer growing season Northern<br />

Tanzania, Southern Malawi, parts of Eastern Kenya and parts of Mozambique. With the advent of<br />

photo insensitive medium-duration varieties with ratoonability are grown in areas away from equator<br />

and drought prone/warm temperature areas (unsuitable for long-duration varieties) or areas with short<br />

growing season. Varietal release process in ESA in general is very slow but through concerted efforts<br />

by on-farm FPVS, demonstrations and farmers’ field days resulted in fast tracking of varietal releases.<br />

In total, one long duration (in Kenya) and three medium duration varieties (two in Malawi and one in<br />

Kenya) released in ESA. Similarly, 12 high yielding and fusarium wilt resistant farmer and market<br />

preferred medium (eight) and long duration (four) varieties are under various stages of National<br />

performance Trials (NPT)/DUS testing in Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi and Mozambique.<br />

175


In Kenya, last three years under treasure legumes project large number of FPVS and demos were<br />

organized, which facilitated in release of best-bet farmer choice varieties both in medium(ICEAP<br />

00850) and long duration (ICEAP 00932) group. Four more medium duration varieties (ICEAP 00557,<br />

00554, 00902, 00911) entered in to NPT and DUS evaluation is under progress in close collaboration<br />

with KEPHIS.<br />

In Tanzania, on-station and on-farm FPVS trials conducted in Babati, Karatu, Kondoa and Arumeru<br />

districts of Northern Tanzania under TL-II and Treasure legumes over years resulted in identification<br />

and inclusion of two medium (ICEAPs 00557, 00554) and two long duration varieties (ICEAP 00053,<br />

00932) in NPT.<br />

In Malawi, two medium duration varieties ICEAP 00557(Southern, Central and Northern regions) and<br />

ICEAP 01514/15 (Central and Northern regions) were released for cultivation.<br />

In Mozambique, two long duration varieties (ICEAPs 00040 and 00020) are under consideration for<br />

release and two medium duration varieties (ICEAPs 00557, 00554) are being evaluated.<br />

Quite a good number success stories of pigeonpea revolution in ESA in general and Babati district of<br />

Northern Tanzania in particular elicited wide spread interest among farmers, traders, researchers and<br />

policy makers. This coupled with large number of on-farm evaluations, varietal releases and demand<br />

from domestic and export markets elevated the place of pigeonpea in ESA’s agricultural map.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes-II, BMGF; Treasure legumes-IFAD; Kellogg’s fund<br />

SN Silim, NVPR Ganga Rao, Moses Siambi,<br />

M Somo, P Kalok and HHD Chipeta<br />

Output target 2011 4.1.1: Groundnut varietal adaptation trials including on-farm variety tests<br />

conducted and monitored in ESA countries<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as on station and ion farm trials were carried out in Tanzania, Malawi Mozambique and<br />

Uganda<br />

Countries involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Uganda<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, National Smallholders Farmers<br />

Association (NASFAM) Malawi, CARE Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute Tanzania,<br />

Makutopora Research Station Tanzania, Diocese of Central Tanganyika, Diocese of Masasi and<br />

Tunduru, KMAS, Dutch Connection, Masasi District Council Tanzania, Dodoma District Council<br />

Tanzania, Chamwino District Council Tanzania, Department of Crop Development (DCD),<br />

Agricultural Seed Agency (ASA) and Tanzania Official Seed Certification Institute (TOSCI), Institute<br />

of Agricultural Research – Nampula Research Station Mozambique, Inhambane and Nampula Districts<br />

Mozambique, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Mozambique. Uganda National Agricultural Research Organization (NARO)<br />

Progress /Results:<br />

Identification of groundnut varieties with high yielding potential, market preferred traits and resistance<br />

to foliar diseases and aflatoxin is important in addressing stakeholders’ demands. Attention is being<br />

focused on developing and identifying varieties with resistance to rosette, rust, ELS, LLS, and<br />

aflatoxin, in addition to grain size and adaptation to varying environments across ESA. As a result<br />

germplasm was supplied for on-station and on-farm trials to collaborating partners within NARES.<br />

A total of 47 sets that includes: 19 in Tanzania, 14 in Malawi , and 14 in Mozambique of 13 different<br />

Elite Regional Trials and nurseries responding to different constraints inclusive of length of growing<br />

period, drought, rosette, rust and ELS were distributed for the 2009/10 season. These trials were<br />

evaluated on-station. Besides evaluating for high yield and resistance to drought and foliar diseases, one<br />

176


trial was supplied on request to Tanzania to screen for grain oil content. In Malawi the trials were<br />

planted at Chitedze, Chitala, and Kasinthula research stations; in Mozambique trials were planted in<br />

Nampulaand Inhambane provinces while in Tanzania trials were planted at Naliendele, Nachingwea,<br />

Bihawana, Hombolo, and Makutopora research stations. All the trials were laid out in a simple lattice<br />

design.<br />

Another set of 291 on-farm trials were evaluated in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania. These<br />

comprised of 18 sets by groups of farmers in Mozambique, 216 sets by individual farmers spread over 8<br />

districts in Malawi and 57 sets spread over 20 villages in 4 districts of Tanzania.<br />

• In Tanzania the best entries among the Elite Rust Resistant germplasm are ICGV-SM 03544,<br />

ICGV-SM 03521, and ICGV-SM 03510, that provided 51-64% yield superiority over the<br />

released varieties Nyota and 28 -39% over the popular variety Pendo (900 – 977 kg ha -1<br />

against 594 and 703kg ha -1 ). Among the Regional Elite Spanish varieties, ICGV-SM 99568<br />

and ICGV-SM 99566 were the best (1794 and 2038 kg ha -1 vs 960 kg ha -1 attained by the<br />

popular JL 24) 89 – 112% superiority. Among the Elite Regional Virginia, ICGV-SM 05606<br />

was the best 1341 kg ha -1 against 1129 kg ha -1 for CG 7 under no disease pressure.<br />

• In Malawi, superior lines were identified from the Elite Regional Spanish which includes,<br />

ICGV-SM 05723 (2373 kg ha -1 ), followed by ICGV-SM 99537 (2042 kg ha -1 ) and ICGV-SM<br />

94139 (1854 kg ha -1 ) against the standard popular JL 24 (1484 kg ha -1 ) reflecting a superiority<br />

of 25 - 60%. Among the Elite Virginia, the best three under high rosette pressure were ICGV-<br />

SM 01731 (1214 kg ha -1 ), ICGV-SM 05701 (1177 kg ha -1 ), and ICGV-SM 08503 (1138 kg ha -<br />

1 ), Yield superiority against the standard CG 7 (846 kg ha -1 ) was 35 - 43%.<br />

• In Mozambique, ICGV 94146 was the best (1663 kg ha -1 ), among the Elite drought tolerant<br />

lines compared to the released variety ICG 12991 also known as Nematil (1055 kg ha -1 ) a<br />

58% superiority across sites in Inhambane and Nampula. Other superior lines were ICGV-SM<br />

03502, ICGV-SM 03543 and ICGV 94139 all superior to Nematil by more than 24%.<br />

Among the elite rosette resistant lines, ICGV-SM 99566, ICGV-SM 03520 ICGV-SM 99541<br />

and ICGV-SM 01506 were among the best with grain yields ranging from 1330 – 1539 kg ha -1<br />

a 31 – 52% superiority over the released variety Nematil (1013 kg ha -1 ).<br />

• Following the release of 5 new varieties in Tanzania last year (ICGV-SM 01721, ICGV-SM<br />

01711, ICGV-SM 99555, ICGV-SM 99557, and ICGV-SM 83708) after 3 seasons of rigorous<br />

on-farm PVS the following new varieties were identified as potential candidates for a new<br />

round of on-farm verification trials - ICGV SM 03521 and ICGV SM 00537. Traits preferred<br />

by farmers were high yields, big pod size and tolerance to diseases<br />

• In Malawi, FPVS revealed that farmers preferred ICGV-SM 99567 and ICGV-SM 03576,<br />

Kakoma and Chitala of the Spanish types, and ICGV-SM series 01708 and 01728, 99772,<br />

Nsinjiro and Chalimbana 2005 of Virginia types based on ranking across sites in 2009/10 crop<br />

season and previous seasons<br />

• In Mozambique the most preferred varieties were ICGV-SM 01514, ICGV-SM 99541 and<br />

ICGV-SM 99568. Pod filling was the most preferred trait by farmers in Inhambane<br />

Mozambique where the biggest problem is pops.<br />

• In addition to the above, Uganda concluded the series of on-farm trials begun more than two<br />

seasons ago with the release of two new groundnut varieties in June <strong>2010</strong> as follows:<br />

o ICGV-SM 93535 the first red seeded rosette resistant variety in the region<br />

o ICGV-SM 99566 tan seeded early maturity (90-100 days) and rosette resistant<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes II and McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, S. Njoroge, O Mponda, A Chamango, M Amane,<br />

H Charlie, W Munthali and E Sichone-Chilumpha<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.2: At least 2 M.Sc students from ESA trained in pigeonpea and chickpea<br />

breeding and 2000 farmers trained in their production and management<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 % targets by training 3 students on chickpea and pigeonpea breeding. 9223 and 6163<br />

farmers trained on pigeonpea and chickpea production, seed production and utilization aspects,<br />

respectively.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia<br />

177


Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi; <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru; Lake Zone Agricultural Research and Development Institute-<br />

Tanzania; Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Centre-Ethiopia; Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />

(Njoro) –Kenya; Selian Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania; Ilonga Agricultural Research<br />

Institute-Tanzania; Chitedze Agricultural Research Station-Malawi; <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Lilongwe<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Pigeonpea and chickpea growing countries of ESA are constrained with acute shortage of technical<br />

manpower trained on crop improvement, production and utilization. Add to these farmers, agricultural<br />

extension staff and all other stakeholders are less aware about new superior varieties pigeonpea and<br />

chickpea and better production technologies. To develop long term resource base, trained 3 students on<br />

chickpea(two) and pigeonpea breeding(one); and 9223 and 6163 farmers trained on pigeonpea and<br />

chickpea production, seed production and utilization aspects, respectively.<br />

Two students (Peter Kaloki, Kenya and Tadesse Safera, Ethiopia) are working chickpea improvement.<br />

Peter Kaloki is trying to understand genetics/diversity of heat tolerance existing in kabuli and desi<br />

genotypes while Tadesse Safera working on molecular characterization of Ethiopian chickpea<br />

cultivars. One student from Tanzania (Mayomba Maryanna Maryange) is working on pigeonpea<br />

breeding.<br />

In ESA 6163 farmers were trained on various aspects of chickpea production technology, FPVS trials<br />

conduction and data collection, improved chickpea varieties, quality seed production, processing and<br />

post harvest handing including utilization in Ethiopia(5343), Tanzania(361) and Kenya(459).<br />

Similarly, 9223 ESA farmers were trained on various pigeonpea technologies through on-farm trials,<br />

field days, quality seed production, processing and utilization in Tanzania (7818) and Malawi (1405).<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes-II, BMGF<br />

SN Silim and NVPR Ganga<br />

Rao<br />

Output Target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.2. At least 2 M.Sc students from ESA trained in pigeonpea and chickpea<br />

breeding 1 MSc each in groundnut breeding and seed systems and 2000 farmers trained in their<br />

production and management<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as the 2 Msc students graduated<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, and Naliendele Agricultural<br />

Research Institute Tanzania,<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

In order to sustain the breeding program and seed systems in ESA there is need for more investment in<br />

training scientists on a continued basis as well as farmers on modern farming technologies. Enhanced<br />

skills will enable individuals to be more productive and being able to produce more output. Hence there<br />

was need to train staff in seed technology (Malawi) as well as conventional breeding (Tanzania) as one<br />

way of accelerating technological changes in their respective countries.<br />

Two students one from Malawi (Mr Wilson Chafutsa) registered at Bunda College of Agriculture and<br />

the other from Tanzania (Mr Juma Mfaume) registered at Sokoine University of Agricultere completed<br />

their MSc studies in Seed Technology and Crop Science respectively under TL2 in November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Besides the MSc students, two PhD students from KwaZulu Natal University are under my supervision.<br />

These are Mr Justus Chintu from Malawi and Mr Amade Muitia from Mozambique both of them<br />

looking at the genetic control of rosette resistance in groundnuts and developing resistant varieties. Dr<br />

Njoroge (associate professional officer) met severally with Mr. Chintu, and provided him with relevant<br />

178


literature/material on groundnut diseases. He will work with him this season (<strong>2010</strong>/2011) on disease<br />

assessments in his trials.<br />

So far all the 2 MSc students completed their studies by end of <strong>2010</strong> and have reported back to their<br />

respective employers. Mr Chafutsa, a Malawian student is working with the ministry of Agriculture in<br />

the department of Research based at Kasinthula while Mr. Jume Mfaune, a Tanzanian national is<br />

working with the department of research and development in the ministry of Agriculture and is based at<br />

Naliendele research station. In Tanzania 1188 farmers and extension officers were trained in seed<br />

production in 2009/10. Two training sessions were organized in Malawi in February and April<br />

involving 22 extension officers and over 40 community facilitators as training of trainers in seed<br />

production.<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes LII<br />

E S Monyo, O Mponda and A Chamango<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.3: At least 500 kg of breeder seed and 10 t of seed of pigeonpea and chickpea<br />

produced to support on farm trial and demonstrations in 4 ESA countries (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 % targets, by producing breeder seed of released/NPT/ PVS varieties of pigeonpea<br />

(short, medium and long duration varieties) and chickpea (desi and kabuli).<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Malawi<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi; Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center-Ethiopia; Lake Zone Agricultural<br />

Research and Development Institute-Tanzania; Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (Njoro)-Kenya;<br />

Selian Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania; Ilonga Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania;<br />

Chitedze Agricultural Research Station-Malawi; <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Lilongwe<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Access to quality seed is the major bottleneck in ESA for achieving greater impacts. Farmers mostly<br />

growing local varieties which are susceptible fusarium wilt and mixed grain quality. Availability of<br />

quality seed is very much critical for conduct of FPVS trials, large scale demonstrations, varietal<br />

releases and maintaining seed production chain. Accordingly, breeder seed of released/NPT/ PVS<br />

varieties of pigeonpea (short, medium and long duration) both under net and space/time isolations; and<br />

chickpea (desi and kabuli) produced. To increase the foundation seed farmer organizations, progressive<br />

farmers and private seed establishments were involved.<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi produced 3095 kg pigeonpea seed of seven long (ICEAPs 00040, 00053, 00020,<br />

00932, 00933, 00576-1, 00936) and five medium duration varieties (00557, 00554, 00850, 00902, and<br />

00911) and one short duration (ICPL 87091) produced in Kenya to meet seed requirements of varietal<br />

release, FPVS evaluation and on-farm demonstrations.<br />

12.3 t of breeder/foundation seed of ICEAPs 00557, 00554, 01514/15, 01480, 00040, ICP 9145 and<br />

Mthwajuni pigeonpea varieties was produced in Malawi. In Tanzania, 18.5 tons of breeder/foundation<br />

seed of ICEAPs 00557, 00554, 00053, 00040, 00932 in Karatu and Babati districts through private<br />

seed sector (Zenobia seeds), contract growers and Farmer associations.<br />

2800 kg chickpea breeder seed of five kabuli (ICCVs 97306, 95423, 00305, 96329, 92318) and four<br />

desi (ICCVs 97126, 00108, 92944, 97105) varieties was produced at Nairobi. About 9.5 tons of<br />

breeder/foundation seed of farmer-preferred varieties was produced by NARS partners in Tanzania<br />

(8.0 t) and Kenya (1.5 t). In Ethiopia, 9.75 t of breeder seed of 9 varieties (Monino, Marye, Arerti,<br />

Habru, Natoli, Ejere, Shasho, Mastewal and Minjar) and 47.5 t of foundation seeds of 8 varieties<br />

(Arereti, Ntoli, Habru, Shasho, Teji, Ejere, Chefe, Marye) was produced.<br />

179


Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes-II, BMGF; Treasure Legumes project-IFAD<br />

SN Silim, NVPR Ganga Rao, P Kaloki,<br />

M Somo and Susan Njeri<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.3: At least 500 kg of breeder seed and 10 t of seed of pigeonpea and chickpea<br />

produced to support on farm trial and demonstrations in 4 ESA countries<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 % targets, by producing breeder seed of released/NPT/ PVS varieties of pigeonpea<br />

(short, medium and long duration varieties) and chickpea (desi and kabuli).<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Malawi<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi, Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center-Ethiopia, Lake Zone Agricultural<br />

Research and Development Institute-Tanzania, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (Njoro)-Kenya,<br />

Selian Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania, Ilonga Agricultural Research Institute-Tanzania,<br />

Chitedze Agricultural Research Station-Malawi, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Lilongwe<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi produced 3095 kg pigeonpea seed of seven long (ICEAPs 00040, 00053, 00020,<br />

00932, 00933, 00576-1, 00936) and five medium duration varieties (00557, 00554, 00850, 00902, and<br />

00911) and one short duration (ICPL 87091) produced in Kenya to meet seed requirements of varietal<br />

release, FPVS evaluation and on-farm demonstrations.<br />

12.3 t of breeder/foundation seed of ICEAPs 00557, 00554, 01514/15, 01480, 00040, ICP 9145 and<br />

Mthwajuni pigeonpea varieties was produced in Malawi. In Tanzania, 18.5 tons of breeder/foundation<br />

seed of ICEAPs 00557, 00554, 00053, 00040, 00932 in Karatu and Babati districts through private<br />

seed sector (Zenobia seeds), contract growers and Farmer associations.<br />

2800 kg chickpea breeder seed of five kabuli (ICCVs 97306, 95423, 00305, 96329, 92318) and four<br />

desi (ICCVs 97126, 00108, 92944, 97105) varieties was produced at Nairobi. About 9.5 tons of<br />

breeder/foundation seed of farmer-preferred varieties was produced by NARS partners in Tanzania<br />

(8.0 t) and Kenya (1.5 t). In Ethiopia, 9.75 t of breeder seed of 9 varieties (Monino, Marye, Arerti,<br />

Habru, Natoli, Ejere, Shasho, Mastewal and Minjar) and 47.5 t of foundation seeds of 8 varieties<br />

(Arereti, Ntoli, Habru, Shasho, Teji, Ejere, Chefe, Marye) was produced.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Tropical Legumes-II, BMGF; Treasure Legumes project-IFAD<br />

SN Silim, NVPR Ganga Rao, P Kaloki, M Somo,<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.4: At least 2 sorghum and or millet varieties released in one country<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% as two varieties were released in Ethiopia<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Ethiopia<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Amhara Region Agriculture Research Institute (ARARI)<br />

Progress /results:<br />

The regional sorghum and millet variety /hybrid trials are regularly conducted across ESA countries<br />

and these have usually resulted in best bet optional cultivars for release. The variety ICSV111IN has<br />

180


een recommended and released by the Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) in<br />

Ethiopia and named Hormat. This variety has also been released in Eritrea and has demonstrated very<br />

good levels for striga resistance in both countries. The ARARI station at Sirinka in Ethiopia has also<br />

obtained a pre released status for the sorghum variety Sima which is also released in Zambia and also<br />

has a pre releases status in Zimbabwe. This variety has demonstrate stability in performance across<br />

environments and has multiple uses characteristics like food and brewing. The variety Sima is mainly<br />

targeted for brewing because of it meets brewing specifications such as large white seeds on a tan plant<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

HOPE<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.1.7: At least 200 kg of breeder seed of sorghum and or millet availed to two<br />

ESA countries<br />

Achievement of Output Target<br />

100% achieved and the quantities targeted were exceeded<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Madagascar, Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NARS Madagascar (FOFIFA), FAO Madagascar, Namburi Agricultural Seed Company and Zanobia<br />

Seeds ( Tanzania )<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> ESA cereal program receives request for seed from both public and private companies. In<br />

<strong>2010</strong> there were specific requests targeting varieties that have been identified that meet specifications<br />

as stipulated by the brewing industries that use sorghum as the main substrate. Two seed companies<br />

(Namburi and Zanobia) in Tanzania received 120kgs of Macia and 40 kgs of KARI Mtama 1 was<br />

availed to Zanobia. Madagascar FAO was provided with 100kgs of ZSV2 a variety that was tested and<br />

recommended for release. This variety is targeting southern Madagascar region of Tulear. There was<br />

also provision of 10-20 kgs of Macia to Eritrea and Zimbabwe targeting the multiplication for the<br />

brewing industry. More than 400kgs was availed to four countries<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

HOPE, FAO<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output 4. 2: Improved germplasm and parental lines of adaptable sorghum, pearl millet, pigeon pea,<br />

chickpea and groundnut that are resistant to chronic biotic stresses and meet end user preferences<br />

developed and disseminated with new knowledge to partners<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong>: 4.2.1: Performance and adaptability of bristled pearl millet ICMV221 evaluated<br />

for the first time in ESA to reduce chronic bird damage.<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as the materials are now being evaluated in an additional country<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Eritrea<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

National Agricultural Research Institute (NARI) Eritrea and Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />

(KARI)<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

In the season <strong>2010</strong> long rains a Bristled pearl millet variety trial was conducted with an objective of<br />

evaluating the effect of pearl millet bristles to bird damage. Two field trials were conducted at Kiboko<br />

in the season <strong>2010</strong> LR with 12 pearl millet varieties (6 bristled from India, 4 from cycles of ICMV<br />

181


221 bristled pearl millet selections from Kiboko and 2 local checks). One of the trials was left for the<br />

birds to feed on it without scaring them away and the other one was controlled. The experimental<br />

design used was a Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications. The trial was rain<br />

fed with supplemental irrigation until the earliest entry reached the booting stage where the water was<br />

completely withdrawn. Agronomic data was collected from the trials on number of damaged panicles,<br />

days to flowering, lodging score, grain yield, plant height, seedling vigor and the number of panicles at<br />

different bristle lengths. The collected data was subjected to ANOVA using Genstat 12 and the<br />

following traits were found to have highly significant differences between the varieties under study in<br />

the two trials; bristle length, number of long bristled panicles and the number of short bristled panicles.<br />

The mean trial yield for the controlled for from the bird controlled trial, the highest yields were<br />

obtained from ICMV221brC 0 with 2.045t/ha followed by ICMV221 and ICMV221C 1 with 1.887 and<br />

1.873t/ha respectively. From the uncontrolled bird damage trial the highest yields were 0.427t/ha,<br />

0.324t/ha and 0.315t/ha obtained from ICMV221brC 2 , ICMV221brC 3 and ICMVbrC 1 . From the<br />

analysis it is evident that bird control has an effect on grain yield of pearl millet, and where the bristled<br />

pearl millet were subjected to bird damage, the number and length of bristles have a negligible effect<br />

on the grain yield of pearl millet. All the genotypes in the trial had a higher grain yield in the<br />

controlled (mean yield 1.63t/ha) than uncontrolled set (0.210t/ha) and the mean grain loss due to bird<br />

damage was about 87.8%. Overall in the uncontrolled trial, the yield reduction in ICMV221brC 2 was<br />

by 55% and this can be attributed to presence of bristles. Collaborators in Eritrea also evaluated pearl<br />

millet varieties including Hagaz and “Kona” (ICMV 221 = ICMV 88904), local landraces and also the<br />

bristled pearl millet of ICMV221 (ICMV221br). The trial was planted at Gerset station and had very<br />

good growth and expression. A new version of bristled pearl millet was identified in Eritrea and is<br />

called “Zubedi’ and there are efforts to promote this to farmers<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

ASARECA<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.3. Best sources of groundnut rosette virus resistance and vector resistance<br />

introgressed in preferred varieties using molecular markers<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as three resistant lines of GRV were identified and confirmed<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research<br />

Institute Tanzania.<br />

Progress/results:<br />

New sources of resistance to groundnut rosette have been identified from the genetic resource unit,<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, India through the reference set which has been screened using the infector row technique for<br />

a period of two years. In addition to the already known GRV resistant ICGV-SM 90704 and vector<br />

resistant ICG 12991, three resistant lines were confirmed in 2009 from the reference set as GRV<br />

resistant using grafting trials. These are ICG 6888, ICG 13099 and ICG 14705. Additional sources<br />

were identified during the <strong>2010</strong> season (ICG 15405 and ICG 9449). A crossing program to incorporate<br />

these sources of resistance into the popular varieties as well as the newly released varieties in Tanzania<br />

which include Mnanje, Masasi, Mangaka, Nachingwea and Naliendele was initiated in <strong>2010</strong> and the<br />

progress is as follows:<br />

1. Completed the development of two rosette populations to F5 for phenotyping and genotyping.<br />

Populations are now planted at the high disease pressure nursery.<br />

2. A new crossing program involving resistance sources identified from the reference set have<br />

been initiated. Particular focus is to combine the two known modes of resistance (Aphid and<br />

GRV).<br />

3. Dr Njoroge was trained in detection of rosette viral components using RT-PCR in Dr. Santie<br />

Devillier’s laboratory. We have ordered for the PCR equipment and are still waiting delivery.<br />

182


Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and McKnight Foundation<br />

ES Monyo, S Njoroge, H Charlie and W Munthali<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.4: Striga resistance transferred to farmer-preferred sorghum varieties using<br />

MAS<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved and introgressed lines are available in Sudan and Kenya<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Sudan, Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur; Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri; Indian<br />

Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi; Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The objective of this project is to use marker assisted breeding to enhance sorghum productivity in<br />

Striga prone areas of eastern and central Africa(ECA) by improving the current knowledge on Striga<br />

resistance Quantatitive Trait Loci (QTL) in sorghum through the fine-mapping of SSR and DART<br />

markers tightly linked to Striga QTL, developing and evaluating farmer prefered Striga resistant<br />

sorghum lines and through capacity building for marker assisted breeding in ECA.<br />

QTL mapping of polymorphic markers and identification of markers tightly linked to Striga resistance<br />

This activity focused on the identification of polymorphic markers flanking five target Striga resistance<br />

QTL regions and mapping these markers on the skeleton linkage map of sorghum by making use of a<br />

Recombinant Inbred Line (RIL) population derived from N13 x E 36-1 segregating for Striga<br />

resistance. This fine mapping will enable incorporation of superior levels of Striga resistance in<br />

agronomically elite genetic backgrounds by marker-assisted backcrossing. This was followed by<br />

partially saturating the Striga resistance QTL regions of the linkage map of the (N13 x E 36-1) with<br />

EST-derived SSR and DArT markers. In saturating the linkage map, PCR was optimized for EST-<br />

SSRs and this was followed by screening of genomic SSR markers for the ability to detect mappable<br />

polymorphisms in the (N13 x E 36-1) RIL population. 8 parents were screened with 218 selected<br />

markers using 6% PAGE and/or fragment analysis with an automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3730). 85<br />

polymorphic markers were used for fine mapping. 100 markers out of 218 were polymorphic and were<br />

used for BC3S3 genotyping of Sudanese progenies of N13 previously crossed with Tabat, Wad Ahmed<br />

and AG8.<br />

Farmer preferred Striga resistant sorghum varieties developed and evaluated. In Sudan, 31 BC3S3<br />

advanced backcross progenies developed from N13 x farmer preferred varieties were screened with 100<br />

EST-SSRs. DArT genotyping was performed on the BC3S3 progenies along with the donor and<br />

recurrent parents and results showed that out of 544 DArT clones used, 267 and 139 DArT clones<br />

scored presence and absence for the N13 allele, respectively. For foreground selection, the DArTs data<br />

further revealed 3 backcross progenies with SBI-01 QTL introgression, 9 progenies with SBI-02 and<br />

SBI-05b QTL introgression, 5 progenies with SBI-05a QTL introgression and none with SBI-06 QTL<br />

introgression. These 16 selected BC 3 S 3 progenies of farmer preferred varieties (Tabat, Wad Ahmed and<br />

AG8) were used for further backcrossing to generate a BC 4 population.<br />

Capacity of NARS in marker assisted selection enhanced. Two MSc students received supervision in<br />

the application of molecular techniques and genomics in crop improvement at BecA, specifically in<br />

molecular techniques, genotyping and molecular data analysis. They received scientific assistance in<br />

writing their MSc proposals, which they formally submitted and defended at the University of Nairobi.<br />

The Sudanese professional, Rasha Ali, has received three months training in QTL fine mapping,<br />

saturation of the sorghum linkage map and use of DArT markers at the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Centre of Excellence<br />

in Genomics in India.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

ASARECA - Fighting Striga: Resistance genes deployed to boost sorghum productivity.<br />

D Kiambi, T Hash and S De Villiers<br />

183


Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.5 Development of molecular tools for variety identification and enhanced<br />

breeding efficiency for groundnut and pigeonpea in Malawi (SdV, RJ, MS, EM)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as the groundnuts and pigeon pea varieties were genotyped<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Malawi, BecA, Malawi Seed Services Unit<br />

Progress/ results:<br />

The Malawi Seed Industry Development project (funded by Irish Aid) develops a quality groundnut<br />

seed production system and disseminates improved medium-duration pigeonpea varieties on a large<br />

scale into areas where the crop has not previously been cultivated because of the non-availability of<br />

adapted varieties. Mixing of varieties whose seeds are visually similar would seriously compromise this<br />

initiative. Developing molecular fingerprints for variety identification allows efficient variety<br />

identification to prevent seed admixtures and maintain purity.<br />

Publicly available SSRs were used to characterise cultivated groundnut and pigeonpea germplasm from<br />

Malawi. Polymorphic marker data sets of both crops were mined for a small subset of markers that<br />

provide a unique genetic fingerprint for each variety to allow future monitoring of identity<br />

preservation, tracking of dissemination and adoption of new varieties and avoiding redundancy in gene<br />

banks.<br />

Genotyping for fingerprinting has been completed on groundnut and pigeonpea seeds received from<br />

Malawi. For groundnuts, 6 released and 13 local varieties were screened with 21 SSR markers (GCP<br />

http://gcpcr.grinfo.net/). For pigeonpea, 4 released and 70 genebank accessions were screened with 48<br />

SSR markers, 20 from the GCP and 28 others that were reported in recent publications.<br />

For groundnuts, 1 marker was not informative, 11 markers amplified 2-4 different alleles and 9 markers<br />

amplified between 5-8 different alleles across all the varieties. Using two of these markers (TCF12 and<br />

TC7H11) in combination, all six released varieties (JL24, Chalimbana, CG7, Baka, ICGV12991 and<br />

ICGV99568) can be distinguished. If marker 5D5 is added, all 19 varieties tested can be identified.<br />

Therefore, for groundnuts, the three markers TCF12, 5D5 and TC7H11 used in combination, provide<br />

unique fingerprints for all 19 varieties evaluated in this study. This 3-marker SSR genetic<br />

fingerprinting technique can be used for variety identification, seed purity testing and seed certification<br />

applications.<br />

For pigeonpea, there were few differences detected on the DNA level amongst all the varieties<br />

screened. Of the 48 markers used, 15 did not work well and another 11 were monomorphic. Data from<br />

these 23 markers were eliminated from the fingerprinting study. Only 25 markers detected useful<br />

differences. The three most common and widely grown varieties (Mtawajuni, ICEAP00040 known as<br />

Kachangu and ICEAP9145 known as Sauma, as well as the introduced varieties ICPV87105 and<br />

ICEAP00557) can be distinguished with a set of 8 markers. Very little differentiation is possible<br />

amongst the gene bank accessions with the set of markers used in this study. This data is still subject to<br />

further evaluation but these preliminary observations support the findings of other studies that there is<br />

very little genetic diversity in cultivated pigeonpea that can be elucidated with the current validated<br />

SSR markers available for pigeonpea.<br />

In October, 2 staff members from the Malawi Seed Systems Unit laboratories and one PhD student<br />

were trained at the BecA/ILRI hub on DNA extraction and SSR genotyping in order to build the<br />

capacity in Malawi for incorporate DNA fingerprinting into seed purity and certification applications.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Irish Aid - Malawi Seed Industry Development project.<br />

SM de Villiers, RB Jones, M Siambi and E Monyo<br />

184


Output target 2009 4.2.5. Groundnut Breeding activities (and associated phenotyping facilities)<br />

initiated in at least one research station in Malawi and Tanzania<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Phenotyping facilities have been initiated in Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research<br />

Institute Tanzania.<br />

Progress/results:<br />

Breeding activities in NARS have been lagging behind following poor infrastructures in disease<br />

screening, crossing and irrigation facilities. For the smooth operation on breeding work there is need<br />

to ensure facilities are in place and scientists and technicians in partnering countries are well<br />

supported to carry out their breeding work efficiently.<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>, funds for infrastructure development were disbursed to NARS partners for drilling boreholes<br />

to support irrigation work in Tanzania and Malawi and construction of glass houses. In addition,<br />

training on artificial hybridization for technical staff ensured that frontline staff are able to carry out<br />

crosses and initiate their own hybridization program.<br />

To this effect the following progress has been made:<br />

1. Crosses for incorporation of rosette resistance into farmer preferred locally adapted<br />

germplasm in Tanzania and Mozambique were successfully harvested and have been planted<br />

to generate F2s <strong>2010</strong>/11. At least 30 new crosses were successfully developed at Naliendele<br />

Research in Tanzania in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

2. RILS populations for Rust and ELS have been advanced through F4. Two RILS populations<br />

each for rosette, rust and ELS are being phenotyped in Malawi and Tanzania (rust only).<br />

Phenotyping will be repeated for a second season in F6<br />

3. 50 new crosses involving farmer preferred varieties have been generated involving good<br />

adapted elite lines from WCA and ESA and Elite sources of resistance in a good x good<br />

crossing scheme.<br />

4. We drilled a borehole to support hybridization efforts at Chitedze research station whereas in<br />

Tanzania work is ongoing to develop a one hectare irrigation block.<br />

5. A grafting experiment was conducted at Chitedze research station in order to characterize new<br />

sources of resistance for rosette reaction<br />

6. We have set up a controlled temperature room which will be used for the detarched leaf<br />

assay, which will be used to screen varieties for resistance to foliar pathogens.<br />

7. We obtained a spore collector from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru in October and we are sourcing for a<br />

vacuum pump that is attached to the spore collector. Spore collection will be done during this<br />

season (2011). We have also ordered the media and other equipment for culturing isolates<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, S Njoroge, O Mponda, A Chamango,<br />

Charlie, W Munthali and E Sichone-Chilumpha<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.5: Segregating long duration pigeonpea populations with large grain and<br />

resistance to fusarium wilt developed<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 % targets by making crosses between parents with large grains and resistance to<br />

fusarium wilt.<br />

185


Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Farmers and consumers/traders in ESA prefer large grains with cream seed. Fusarium wilt is one of the<br />

major diseases, inflicting pigeonpea productivity in ESA. Further, under maize cropping systems of<br />

Northern Tanzania farmers are looking for relative late maturity, so that they can reap full potential of<br />

existing favourable long growing season. To achieve this, crosses were attempted between parents with<br />

large grains and resistance to fusarium wilt. The virulence pattern existing in ESA is entirely different<br />

from that of Asia. The germplasm/cultivars from ESA offering greater resistance to fusarium wilt.<br />

Accordingly, crosses were made between ICEAPs 00040(fusarium wilt resistant) and 00048(large<br />

round grains and extra long duration) and F 2 populations were evaluated at Kabete (select for large<br />

grain) and Kiboko (wilt sick location) in 2008/09. 53 individual plants were selected from segregating<br />

populations based on grain yield, maturity duration and 100-seed mass/seed shape, and planted them at<br />

Kabete to carry out another round of selection for yield components and lateness (at high altitude) and<br />

8 F 3 populations found promising out 53 F 2 plants were selected for further evaluation. Looking at the<br />

promise of segregating populations, there is a likelihood of selecting high yielding, late and fusarium<br />

wilt resistant lines.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Nil<br />

SN Silim, NVPR Ganga Rao, P Kaloki and M Somo<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 4.2.6: Multi-locational trials of at least three farmer preferred sorghum varieties carrying one to<br />

three Striga resistance QTLs conducted<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Achieved 100 %<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Mabanga ATC Kenya, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya, Ministry of Agriculture Southern Sudan,<br />

Department of Research and Development Tanzania, Kenya Seed Company<br />

Progress/Results: Regional Sub-humid Sorghum Evaluation: Regional Sub-humid sorghum variety<br />

trials were established at Alupe in Busia and Mabanga ATC in Bungoma county western Kenya. The<br />

trial at Mabanga was run in collaboration with Kenya Seed Comapany (KSC) and comprised of 25<br />

lines bred for sub-humid areas, prone to high incidences of leaf diseases, grain molds and stem borers.<br />

As earlier indicated the season at Alupe was below average hence the lines performed below their<br />

potential with grain yield range of the best 10 lines being 1.390 to 1.746 t/ha compared to Mabanga<br />

site which had the best 10 lines yield between 3.511 to 5.200 t/ha. Inspite of the low yields at Alupe, 4<br />

lines (IESV 92041 SH, IS 21055, IESV 92022/1 SH and IS 25395) gave better grain yield than the<br />

local (Nakhadabo) and improved (Seredo) checks. At Mabanga, IESV 94025SH, IS 21018, IS 8887<br />

out-yielded the commercial check, Seredo. The 4 highest grain yielding varieties at both locations also<br />

had grain yields higher than IESV 92033 SH which was entered into NPT in <strong>2010</strong> by Kenya Seed<br />

Company.<br />

The trial was also conducted at Bur Payam Eastern Equatorial of Southern Sudan in the season <strong>2010</strong><br />

where 27 sorghum varietal lines and a local check were augmented in a trial with an objective of<br />

evaluating their adaptation and the yield aspects. The trial was replicated three times in 4 rows of 4 m<br />

length with an inter row spacing of 0.75 m and intra row spacing of 0.2m using RCBD trial design.<br />

The trial was rain fed. Data was collected from the 2 centre rows of each plot as per the trial protocol<br />

on Seedling vigour(1-5) ,stand after thinning, date to 50% flowering, plant height (cm), disease<br />

damage score (1-9), insect damage score (1-9), agronomic score (1-5), plant stand at harvest, grain<br />

weight (gm), 100 seed mass (gm), lodging and the number of tillers.<br />

186


The results of the trial were subjected to statistical analysis using Genstat 12 and the following traits<br />

showed a highly significant difference at 95% confidence interval; plant height, seed mass and the<br />

overall disease score. The average plant height of the varieties under study was 168 cm with a range of<br />

113 cm- 254 cm in IESV 23017 DL and Local check respectively. The average disease score in the<br />

trial was 3.3 with a range of 1-7 with the most resistant and susceptible varieties being ICSR 161 and<br />

IESV 92043 DL respectively. The average seed size was 2.21 gm with a range of 1.433 -3.3 gms in<br />

100 seeds.<br />

Elite sorghum trial: The trial had 25 selections from advanced sorghum germplasm lines selected from<br />

Busia/Siaya/Teso germplasm during the 2009 short rains season and planted at Alupe in <strong>2010</strong> long<br />

rainy season. Siaya 46-2 had the highest grain yield of 4.244 t/ha with good overall leaf disease score<br />

(4.6) whereas the improved Seredo and IS 8193 had yields of 3.984 (disease score 5.0) and 3.627<br />

(disease score 5.4) t/ha respectively.<br />

Hybrid Test cross Evaluation: 416 test cross sorghum hybrids made in 2009/10 short rainy season were<br />

evaluated at Kiboko to determine fertility restoration. Data were also collected on seedling vigour ,<br />

stand after thinning, date to 50% flowering, plant height, percent seed set, disease and insect damage,<br />

number of productive tillers, panicle exertion, panicle length, panicle width, panicle shape, presence of<br />

awns at maturity, agronomic score, grain weight , 100 seed mass, glume color, grain covering, seed<br />

and plant color. Preliminary results showed the hybrids flowering between 59 and 88 days after sowing<br />

with the best hybrids giving grain yields between 5.00 and 8.00 t/ha. 135 hybrids attained over 98%<br />

fertility restoration of which 121 have been put into a preliminary yield trial and planted at Kiboko<br />

(Kenya), and Miwaleni, and Ukiriguru in Tanzania.<br />

Sorghum Preliminary variety Evaluation Trial: 99 sorghum lines were evaluated at Miwaleni; Moshi<br />

district of Tanzania during the <strong>2010</strong> season. Quantitative data from Miwaleni were subjected to<br />

ANOVA and three traits (Number of tillers, plant height, and plant stand) showed significant<br />

difference at p=0.05. High variability was observed in number of tillers (0- 4 tillers), plant height<br />

(mean 91.6- 205 cm). The earliest variety to flower was ZSV 3 at 31 days after sowing and the latest,<br />

the local check at 78 days after sowing. Mean days to 50% flowering was 66 days after planting. The<br />

mean grain yield was 2.366 tons/ha with a yield range of 0.333- 5.667 tons/ha for IESV 91038 DL and<br />

IESV 92028 DL respectively. Nine varieties IESV 92028 DL, IESV 92008 DL, IESV 23007 DL, IESV<br />

92001 DL, IESV 92021 DL, IESV 92207 DL, Kaguru x Macia-3-1-1-3-1, IESV 23006 DL and KAT<br />

487 attained grain yields above 4.00 t/ha well above the local check yield of 1.333 t/ha. Forty seven<br />

lines with grain yields above trial mean (2.37 t/ha) shall be put into an advanced trial next season. The<br />

trial was also sent to Ethiopia and Eritrea and results are still awaited.<br />

Regional Drought tolerant sorghum trial: The regional drought tolerant trial kit was established in<br />

Kenya (Kiboko) and in Tanzania (Hombolo) in 2009 and results were reported in 2009 archival. The<br />

same trial was planted at Miwaleni Tanzania in <strong>2010</strong>. All the test varieties outperformed the local<br />

check. Fifteen best yielding varieties had grain mean yields ranging from 2.556 ( SP 993515) to 4.056<br />

(IESV 23005 DL) t/ha against the check yield of 0.889 t/ha. Compared to data from Hombolo and<br />

Kiboko (2009) varieties IESV 23004 DL, IESV 23011 DL and IESV 23007 DL performed well across<br />

the 3 locations.<br />

Low Temperature Tolerant Sorghum Evaluation: The evaluation targets the high altitude areas of<br />

eastern Africa where low temperatures negatively affect seed set. The materials were selected from a<br />

collection of eastern Africa high altitude sorghum germplasm and cold tolerant lines bred by<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi. The trial had 25 lines and they were evaluated at Elgon Downs farm in Kitale<br />

(towards north western Kenya) in collaboration with KSC. Already KSC has entered one cold tolerant<br />

variety (BM 27) into the NPT in <strong>2010</strong>. Four lines Abaleshya (3.511 t/ha), IESV 91069 LT (2.978 t/ha),<br />

MB 29 (2.800 t/ha) and MB 30 (2.800 t/ha) had grain yields higher than BM 27 (2.756 t/ha) and the<br />

check variety E 1291 (2.356 t/ha)<br />

Preliminary Finger millet Trial: The trial comprising of 144 entries selected from global core collection<br />

that had been screened in 2005/6 and established at Alupe to evaluate for grain yield and blast reaction.<br />

Overall Blast rating was done on a 1-9 scale. Blast incidence was lower than usual (range 1.5 for KNE<br />

689 to 8.0 in IE # 6533 and KNE # 6546) owing to low humidity occasioned by poor rainfall, with<br />

grain yields ranging from 0.375 t/ha (IE 2006) to 3.020 t/ha (IE 2047). The highest yielding lines with<br />

187


good blast tolerance were IE 2047, IE 4121, KNE 758, IE 5066, IE 3165, IE 6294, IE 4115, IE 2590,<br />

IE 2619, IE 4047, IE 4192, KNE 688, IE 4122,IE 4118, IE 2633, Gulu E, IE 3827, IE 4997, IE 2457<br />

and IE 3779. Selections were done based on grain yield and blast scores (< 4.0). A total of 64<br />

selections were made and these have been put into a regional trial and planted at Alupe in the <strong>2010</strong>SR<br />

season, Serere- Uganda (<strong>2010</strong>SR) and Uyole - Tanzania (Jan 2011).<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

HOPE project<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.7: Segregating medium duration pigeonpea populations with large round<br />

grains and traits associated with insect pest tolerance developed (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

Crosses were made between parents with high yielding, large grains and pest tolerant genotypes and<br />

achieved 100 % targets.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Nairobi<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Large round grains are preferred in ESA both in terms of superior milling quality and consumer<br />

acceptance. Pest tolerance in field as well as storage conditions provides greater relief to farmers, seed<br />

producers and traders with ease in handling. To attain this goal crosses were made between parents<br />

with high yielding, large grains and pest tolerant genotypes.<br />

Crosses were made between ICEAP 00040 (long duration, wilt tolerant, good grain type) and<br />

Mthwajuni; Acc 88 and ICEAP 00576-1(long duration, wilt tolerant, good grain type) to incorporate<br />

pest tolerance from Mthwajuni (Malawian germplasm) and Acc 88(Tanzanian germplasm) to<br />

incorporate pest tolerance.<br />

After two rounds of evaluation, 21 progenies showed promise from segregating populations of cross<br />

between ICEAP 00040 x Mthwajuni and planted them at Kabete for further evaluation and selection.<br />

The segregating population showed genetic diversity for grain yield, pod hairyness (linked with pest<br />

tolerance), 100 seed mass, seed colour and seed shape. Some progenies were relatively uniform with<br />

some promise when compared to both the parents, these will be further tested for confirmation.<br />

Progenies of medium duration and wilt tolerant genotypes (ICEAPs 00554, 00557) and pest tolerant<br />

Mthwajuni (Malawian germplasm) are being evaluated at Kiboko.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Nil<br />

SN Silim, NVPR Ganga Rao, M Somo and P Kaloki<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.7. At least 5 kg nuclear seed of each of 15 varieties in Regional Trials<br />

produced annually from 2008 to 2011 as source for breeder seed and entries for collaborative trials<br />

with NARS in ESA<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as nuclear seed was produced in all the targeted countries<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research<br />

Institute Tanzania. Institute of Agricultural Research Nampula, Mozambique<br />

188


Nuclear seed remains the only source of breeder seed production as well as source of entries for<br />

collaborative trials with NARS in ESA. Therefore to increase seed availability, seed multiplication<br />

activities of promising entries in the regional trials were carried out on-station.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

1. In Malawi, a total of 191 elite lines were produced with yield ranging from 5 kgs to 80 kgs.<br />

2. in Tanzania the following nuclear seed was produced ICGV-SM 99555 (10 kg), ICGV-SM<br />

99557 (10kg), ICGV SM 03521 (5kg) and ICGV SM 00537 (5 kg)<br />

3. In Mozambique the following nuclear seed was produced Nametil (20 kg), Mamane (30 kg),<br />

JL 24 (25 kg), ICGV-SM 99541 (54 kg), ICGV-SM 99568 (40 kg), and CG 9 (50 kg)<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, O Mponda, A Chamango and M Amane<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.8: At least 5 kg nuclear seed of each of 15 varieties in Regional Trials<br />

produced annually from 2008 to 2011 as source for breeder seed and entries for collaborative trials<br />

with NARS in ESA.<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved as all the targeted seed quantities were produced.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Uganda<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

KARI, NaSSARI Uganda, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Ministry of<br />

Agriculture south Sudan,<br />

Progress /Results:<br />

In the year <strong>2010</strong> we had 9 sets of 28 entries for the regional sorghum variety trials for the dry lowlands<br />

and 6 sets of 25 entries for the sub-humid sent to Tanzania, Uganda, Kenya ; 8 sets for the sorghum<br />

hybrid trials with 16 entries sent to Kenya, Ethiopia and Southern Sudan; 3 sets of 25 entries for the<br />

sweet stalk sorghum to Kenya and Uganda. For the open pollinated varieties there were 66 entries and<br />

seed production of these together with additional materials were multiplied in Kiboko Kenya and a<br />

minimum of 5kgs of each is maintained for experimentation as well as provisos to partners as may be<br />

requested.<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.8. At least 1 ton breeder seed of 3 released farmer/market preferred<br />

groundnut varieties in ESA produced annually from 2008 to 2011 as source for foundation seed for<br />

collaborating NARS and other partners<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved and seed of various classes are available for all crops<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research<br />

Institute Tanzania. Institute of Agricultural Research Nampula, Mozambique<br />

Lack of seed of improved varieties remains one of the key constraints to groundnut production. To<br />

ensure enough availability of foundation seed there is need to strengthen breeder seed production of<br />

the farmer preferred varieties. This will also ensure constant supply of breeder seed to the<br />

collaborating partners. In view of this breeder seed production activities were carried out on-station.<br />

189


Achievements.<br />

1. The following breeder seed quantities were produced:<br />

a. In Malawi: ICGV-SM 90704 (1 560 kg), CG 7 (1340kg), ICGV-SM 99568<br />

(12049kg), ICG 12991 (320kg), JL 24 (800kg), ICGV 93437 (520kg for<br />

Zimbabwe).<br />

b. In Tanzania: ICGMS 33 (4000kg), ICGV-SM 01721 (250kg), ICGV-SM 83708<br />

(400kg) and ICGV-SM 99557 (100kg)<br />

c. In Mozambique: ICG 12991 (850kg), ICGV-SM 90704 (430kg). ICGV-SM 99541<br />

(450kg), ICGV 99568 (320kg), JL 24 (300kg), CG 7 (110kg)<br />

2. The following quantities of foundation seed was produced by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and partners in ESA<br />

a. In Malawi: ICGV-SM 90704 (39,432 kg), ICGV-SM 99568 (13,335kg)<br />

b. In Tanzania: ICGMS 33 (54,000kg)<br />

c. In Mozambique: ICG 12991 (950kg), ICGV-SM 90704 (900kg). JL 24 (3300kg)<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, O Mponda, A Chamango and M Amane<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.2.9: At least 1 t breeder seed of 3 released farmer/market preferred varieties in<br />

ESA produced annually from 2008 to 2011 as source for foundation seed for collaborating NARS and<br />

other partners<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% achieved<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Tanzania, Zimbabwe<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Department of Research and Development, FAO, Department of Research and Specialist Services<br />

(DR&SS)<br />

Progress/ Results:<br />

The three most popular sorghum varieties in the ESA region are Macia, Gadam , KARI Mtama 1 and<br />

these are increasingly demanded because they meet the food, feed and brewing specifications and the<br />

two Macia and Gadam are early and therefore adapt well to the frequents droughts experienced in the<br />

region. The seed production for the three varieties were over and above the Output target target (Macia<br />

1.2t produced at Miwaleni station in Tanzania; 800kgs of Gadam el Hamam in Miwaleni and Kiboko<br />

stations and 300kgs of KARI Mtama 1 at Kiboko. The total amount is at 2.3 t. There were 18 t of<br />

foundation seed of sorghum variety Macia produced in Tanzania at the Miwaleni station<br />

ESA-Bulawayo: Foundation Seed Production in Zimbabwe: Good seed is one of the most important<br />

primary inputs needed for good crop production. In Zimbabwe, smallholder farming has become the<br />

major player in the country’s crop production. However, limited access by smallholder farmers to good<br />

seed, and seed availability problems continue to suppress crop production progress under smallholder<br />

farming. The International Crops Research Institute of the Semi-Arid Tropics (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>) in<br />

Zimbabwe, with financial support from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), initiated<br />

foundation seed production of four crops, Cowpeas, Groundnuts, Sorghum and Pearl Millet. We<br />

believe that this initiative will also help advance the genetic purity of seeds substantially, as well as<br />

arresting the loss of vigor over time. This project started in 2009. The Crops Breeding Institute (CBI),<br />

part of the Government’s Research and Specialist Services with mandate to produce foundation seed of<br />

varieties released in Zimbabwe is a partner in this project and provided 5kg of seed of each of the three<br />

varieties of cowpea (CBC1, CBC2 and CBC3). From the 5kg of each of these cowpea varieties, we<br />

managed to produce close to 2 tons of cowpea foundation seed. In the second season of seed production<br />

(2009/<strong>2010</strong>), <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Bulawayo has produced 10100 kg of sorghum seed, 9418kg of pearl millet<br />

seed, and 4000kg of cowpea seed. In <strong>2010</strong>/1011 season, hectares planted for groundnuts, cowpeas,<br />

pearl millet are shown. In addition, during the season <strong>2010</strong>/2011, released sorghum and pearl millet<br />

190


varieties have been grown to regenerate seed and increase seed for those varieties that are low in seed<br />

stock<br />

M Mgonja, H Ojulong, E Manyasa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output 4.3: New knowledge of the QTLs for the stay green and drought tolerance traits confirmed,<br />

and marker assisted selection efficiency improved, and specific abiotic stress tolerant varieties and<br />

associated knowledge for sorghum, pearl millet and groundnuts developed and disseminated in<br />

ESA with associated capacity development<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.3.3. At least 1 backcross population for each farmer preferred variety<br />

incorporating one or more sources of disease (GRD, ELS, rust) resistance or drought tolerance for use<br />

in marker assisted backcross improvement<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

50%<br />

Markers to use in MABC have not been identified , however BC2 generations incorporating<br />

GRV,ELS and Rust resistance were implemented<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, Mozambique and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

1. The work through TL1 to identify markers for use in MABC has not given us this tool to use<br />

in ESA. However we proceeded to the production of second backcross generation<br />

incorporating GRV, ELS and Rust resistance into farmer preferred adapted varieties in ESA –<br />

using conventional breeding. This included ICGMS 33 (Pendo) for Tanzania, JL 24<br />

(Kakoma), Chalimbana and ICGV-SM 83708 (CG 7) for Malawi. We also completed the<br />

production of F4 generation of 9 populations; 3 for GRV, 2 for ELS, and 4 for Rust which will<br />

be phenotyped and genotyped through TL1 with the objective of identification of appropriate<br />

markers for use in MABC.<br />

2. We also produced F2 populations of four West African farmer-preferred varieties, 55-437,<br />

Fleur 11, 47-10 and ICGV 86124 with the ESA GRV and ELS sources of resistance. These<br />

are intended for use in MABC when reliable markers for these traits become available through<br />

TL1<br />

3. A back cross for ELS diallel crosses focusing on the mode of gene action for ELS resistance<br />

has been developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi glass houses. The aim for this activity is to<br />

understand how resistance to ELS is inherited so as to create a more focused ELS breeding<br />

program. F1 s from a p (p-1) diallel mating (ELS) design developed from a 2009/10 season are<br />

also being advanced into F2s.<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, S Njoroge, Charlie,<br />

W Munthali and E Sichone-Chilumpha<br />

Output 4.4 Progress in knowledge and/or improved germplasm of nutritionally enhanced transgenic<br />

sorghum and biofortified germplasm with enhanced micronutrient levels available for evaluation<br />

Output target: 4.4.1: Documentation for risk/safety assessment for GM regulatory needs drafted:<br />

Achievement of Output target:<br />

100%<br />

The project was though terminated due to lack of funding.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Burkina Faso, South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria<br />

191


Partner Institutions:<br />

KARI-Kenya, INERA-Burkina Faso, ARI-South Africa.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

A second set of hybrid fitness F3 population was planted in Kiboko, Kenya during the first rains of<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Seed from heads from different heads were planted on rows of 4m long with spacing of 0.75 x<br />

0.3 between and within rows. The first 60 plants (excluding the first plant) were target per row to<br />

provide the data points. Agronomic data (days after planting (DAF), days after heading (DAH), plant<br />

height, stem girth, number of leaves, leaf length and width, penducle length, panicle exertion, length<br />

and width) and harvest data (number of seeds, weight of 100 grains, panicle weight and yield per plant<br />

were taken and averaged to give the data per head; which was used for analysis. Genotypes were<br />

grouped according to mating types:- Wild x Cultivated (W x C), Cultivated x Wild (C x W), wild selfed<br />

(W x W) and cultivated Selfed (C x C). Mating types were subjected to one way ANOVA and<br />

correlation. Only agronomic data is being presented<br />

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant differences for all the traits among the breeding types.<br />

Differences were noted between the cultivated parents (Cult x Cult) and the hybrids (Cult x Wild and<br />

Wild x Cult) and wild parents (Wild xWild). No significant differences were however noted between<br />

the wild parents; and the Wild x Cult hybrids, implying that at F 2 hybrids were not superior to the wild<br />

parents. These results are in agreement with earlier results from the same F3 populations grown in<br />

2008/2009 and follows similar patterns as in the F1s and F2s earlier evaluated.<br />

Special Project Funding: Africa Biofortified Sorghum (ABS) project<br />

Henry Ojulong, M Mgonja, E Manysa, P Sheunda and J Kibuka<br />

Output 5: Technological options and knowledge to reduce aflatoxin contamination at<br />

different stages of the groundnut crop cycle developed and disseminated to partner NARES,<br />

traders and processors in ESA with associated capacity building for enhanced food and<br />

feed quality<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 4.5.1. Role of variety/genotype contribution to aflatoxin control documented in<br />

groundnut in ESA<br />

Achievement of Output target:<br />

100% achieved as the two trials were conducted and conditions favoring aflatoxin were identified<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi.<br />

There is growing concern over the danger posed by exposure to aflatoxin on human and livestock<br />

health. For the past decade, incidences of aflatoxin contamination in produce above safety limits has<br />

become a barrier to international trade to European markets.. However, studies have shown that good<br />

cultural practices like early planting and water management through use of tied ridges have a<br />

significant effect in controlling aflatoxin contamination. In addition, use of resistant varieties remains<br />

a viable option to many farmers.<br />

Two trials were conducted with the objective of identification of new sources of resistance to<br />

aflatoxin production in groundnuts. One was a pot trial with treatments that simulated drought stress<br />

through termination of watering towards the end of the season, compared to the control which was<br />

well watered. The second experiment was a field trial but planted late (1 month late) ensuring the<br />

plants would be exposed to water stress at the end of the season, compared to control plants planted at<br />

the onset of rains and maturing before end-of-season water stress<br />

Progress:<br />

1. In the potted trial, aflatoxin levels varied from 0 – 36 ppb in the well watered treatment.<br />

Resistant cultivar J11 had an average aflatoxin contamination of 2ppb. However, under<br />

water stress, aflatoxin contamination in susceptible varieties were as high as 825 ppb<br />

192


compared to 97 ppb in J11. Other resistant varieties in the study included: Monir 240-30, U<br />

4-47-7, U 4-7-5 and VRR 245 all of which scored 0 ppb. In the field trials, aflatoxin<br />

contamination in J11 averaged 4 ppb and ranged from 0 ppb – 996 ppb among 36 entries<br />

evaluated. Resistant sources identified included: ICGV 91329 (0.7 ppb), ICGV 91298 (2.8<br />

ppb), ICGV 91322 (4.4 ppb), ICGV 93293 (7.5 ppb).<br />

2. A hybridization program was initiated between farmer adapted popular varieties with known<br />

sources of resistance to aflatoxin as a basis of working towards improving these varieties for<br />

aflatoxin resistance.<br />

3. We wrote a proposal to START, seeking funding for setting up a aflatoxin screening facility.<br />

Decision on funding is going to be made sometime in February 2011 and we should have it<br />

operational in a few months if we get the funds<br />

4. We requested for additional funding from McKnight foundation to support Ethel Chilumpha<br />

(<strong>ICRISAT</strong> technician) for training in the detection of toxigenic Aspergillus spp at IITA.<br />

Funding was approved and the technician will travel to IITA in March 2011.<br />

Special Project funding: McKnight Foundation<br />

E S Monyo, S Njoroge, E Sichone-Chilumpha and W Munthali<br />

Output target 2011 4.5.1. Farmer-friendly literature in vernacular languages (Swahili and Chichewa)<br />

on improved groundnut varieties and integrated crop management technologies available to farmers in<br />

Malawi and Tanzania<br />

Achievement of Output target:<br />

100% as 2700 flyers on improved varieties and 3000 flyers on recommended<br />

Practices were delivered during field days and. 5000 flyers, leaflets, and brochures were distributed<br />

during the <strong>2010</strong> International Trade Fare in Blantyre, Malawi.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, National Smallholders Farmers<br />

Association (NASFAM) Malawi, CARE Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute Tanzania,<br />

Makutopora Research Station Tanzania, Masasi District Council Tanzania, Dodoma District Council<br />

Tanzania, Chamwino District Council Tanzania, Department of Crop Development (DCD),<br />

Agricultural Seed Agency (ASA).<br />

Information plays a crucial role in technology dissemination. Efforts were made to develop and print<br />

farmer friendly literature in the vernacular languages of Chichewa and Swahili for Malawi and<br />

Tanzania, respectively. In Malawi a total of 2700 flyers on improved varieties and 3000 flyers on<br />

recommended cultural practices were distributed during field days held in conjunction with NARS.<br />

5000 flyers, leaflets, and brochures were distributed during the <strong>2010</strong> International Trade Fare in<br />

Blantyre, Malawi.<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, McKnight Foundation, EU Food Security Program for Malawi<br />

E S Monyo, O Mponda, A Chamango, E Sichone-Chilumpha,<br />

H Charlie, W Munthali and P Kamwendo<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong>: 4.5.2. Pre-harvest and post harvest aflatoxin control measures implemented in at<br />

least 2 countries in an annual basis by <strong>2010</strong><br />

Achievement of Output target:<br />

100% achieved as three strategies were tested for the management of aflatoxin contamination of<br />

groundnut and these were coupled with training of frontline staff from two major groundnuts districts.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi, and Tanzania<br />

193


Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, National Smallholders Farmers<br />

Association (NASFAM) Malawi, CARE Malawi,<br />

Progress/results:<br />

Aflatoxin contamination remains a challenge in groundnut production. Groundnut is prone to infection<br />

by Aspegillus flavus and therefore to aflatoxin contamination, before and after harvest. Unfortunately,<br />

few farmers know little about the control measures. Aflatoxin contamination in farmers’ fields is<br />

enhanced with increased moisture stress. Under water stress, groundnuts develop cracks, which<br />

predispose the pods to infection by Aspergillus spp. and therefore to aflatoxin contamination..<br />

Three strategies were tested for the management of aflatoxin contamination of groundnut through use<br />

of three management options; varieties (resistant, J11 versus susceptible, ICGV-SM 99568), time of<br />

planting (early versus late) and water management (box versus open ridges). The trial was a 2 x 2 x 2<br />

factorial arrangement laid out in a randomized complete block design. Each plot had 4 ridges<br />

measuring 10 m long and plants spaced at 0.75 m between rows and 0.10 m between planting stations<br />

giving a total area of 240 m 2 . Treatments with box ridges, ridges were boxed every 2m.<br />

The other strategy tested was training frontline staff from two major groundnuts producing districts –<br />

Lilongwe and Kasungu at a workshop. The third strategy was to conduct a study on the occurrence and<br />

distribution of aflatoxin contamination in Malawi and developed a GIS based risk map for pre-harvest<br />

and post harvest aflatoxin contamination for Malawi.<br />

Major findings<br />

• Results showed that J11 (resistant variety) had lower levels of aflatoxin contamination than<br />

ICGV-SM 99568 (susceptible variety), 137 and 295 ppb, respectively, and early planting had<br />

lower levels than late planting, 181 and 251 ppb, respectively. Similarly, treatments with box<br />

ridges had lower levels of aflatoxin contamination that those with open ridges, 167 and 244<br />

ppb, respectively.<br />

• Use of box ridges coupled with early planting produced higher yield than in treatments with<br />

open ridges coupled with late planting, 834kg/ha and 731kg/ha respectively for ICGV-SM<br />

99568 and 603kg/ha and 380kg/ha respectively for J 11<br />

• A 4 day training of frontline staff workshop was organized for two major groundnuts<br />

producing districts – Lilongwe and Kasungu from 30 th June – 10 th July with a session for each<br />

district. A total of 27 NARES from different Agricultural Extension Planning Areas, District<br />

Health Offices and NASFAM Field Officers attended. The training involved presentations on<br />

health risks of aflatoxin to human, the groundnuts production chain, critical points for<br />

intervention to manage and control aflatoxin contamination and aflatoxin as a trade barrier.<br />

The presentations were followed by group discussions on the topics and individual<br />

assignments to gauge the understanding of the trainees. The participants finally developed an<br />

action plan tackling three main issues: Lack of awareness, training materials and knowledge of<br />

management tactics. It was obvious that more training sessions are required if the problem of<br />

aflatoxin is to be known, understood and action taken<br />

• We worked with partners and stakeholders to jointly investigate factors influencing aflatoxin<br />

contamination in groundnuts. Important risk factors included three or more weeks drought<br />

during pod formation ,high moisture or relative humidity above 83% at 30 o C, and length of<br />

incubation period. Others are rainfall at the end of the growing season that postpones harvest<br />

and prevents dry-down, grains with moisture levels above 9% at temperatures 28 to 33 o C. Preand<br />

postharvest grain damage by insects, rodents, birds, also predispose grains to colonization<br />

by the fungus and aflatoxin contamination.<br />

• We implemented a study on the occurrence and distribution of aflatoxin contamination in<br />

Malawi and developed a GIS based risk map for pre-harvest and post harvest aflatoxin<br />

contamination.. A. flavus is widely distributed across all groundnut production areas of<br />

Malawi. The distribution varies from 0 to 273,000 cfu / gram of soil in Chikwawa.<br />

Chikwawa district had the highest aflatoxin contamination – of 16,108 cfu/ gram of soil,<br />

followed by Lilongwe at 9,833 cfu/ g soil and Salima at 6767 cfu / gram of soil. The least<br />

contaminated district was Mzimba at 828 cfu / gram soil. Aflatoxin contamination in<br />

groundnuts also was higher in Chikwawa. Among major groundnut growing districts, the<br />

highest distribution of contamination, from high to low, was found in Chikwawa, Salima,<br />

194


Kasungu, Ntcheu, Mulanje, Nchisi, Nkhotakhota, Mchinji, Dowa, and Lilongwe. Though there<br />

was a good relationship between A.flavus contamination levels in the soil with aflatoxin<br />

contamination in the crop, the relationship was not a perfect fit because of a higher potential<br />

for post harvest contamination in zones that were more prone to end of season rains.<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

McKnight Foundation and EU Food Security Program for Malawi<br />

E S Monyo, S. Njoroge, E Sichone-Chilumpha, H Msere,<br />

A Chamango, H Charlie, W Munthali and P Kamwendo<br />

2009: 4.5.3. Farmer Field School concept used with participatory farmer variety selection in adaptive<br />

trials to provide input into groundnut breeding and promote aflatoxin control practices in 2 ESA<br />

countries from 2009<br />

Achievement of Output target:<br />

100% achieved as the number of FFS tripled to 360 attracting a total of 10,264 households<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Malawi and Tanzania<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Malawi, Chitedze Agricultural Research Station Malawi, National Smallholders Farmers<br />

Association (NASFAM) Malawi, CARE Malawi, Naliendele Agricultural Research Institute Tanzania,<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The farmer field school approach is an effective way of transferring technology to farmers in a<br />

participatory manner. It assumes that farmers already have a wealth of knowledge and experience.<br />

Field schools try to focus on basic processes through field observations, season-long research studies,<br />

and hands-on activities. It has been found that when farmers have learned about the basics, combined<br />

with their own experiences and needs, they make decisions that are effective. When farmers have this<br />

basic knowledge they are better clients for extension and research systems because they have more<br />

specific questions and demands. It is against this background that the concept was used in Kasungu<br />

district, Malawi in an effort to reach many farmers with improved technologies.<br />

It was planned that by <strong>2010</strong> a total of 120 field schools each with up to 30 members will be operational.<br />

But due to the overwhelming response in the community the number of FFS tripled to 360 attracting a<br />

total of 10,264 households. Through the FFS farmers were equipped with knowledge on the new<br />

improved varieties as well as recommended control measures in reducing aflatoxin contamination. The<br />

concept was implemented through a partnership project which was implemented with CARE Malawi.<br />

Farmers will use FFS experience to help other farmers to learn about improved groundnut varieties as<br />

well as aflatoxin control measures such as water management and modern ways of drying (ventilated<br />

stacking). Through FFS we achieved the promotion of long-term sustainable seed availability by<br />

establishing local community seed banks among 1872 households in Malawi and linking them to<br />

commercial seed and grain marketers.<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

McKnight Foundation and EU Food Security Program for Malawi<br />

E S Monyo, S. Njoroge, P Kamwendo A Chamango,<br />

H Charlie, W Munthali and E Sichone-Chilumpha<br />

195


MTP Project 5:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Producing more and better food at lower cost of staple cereal and legume<br />

hybrids in the Asian SAT (sorghum, pearl millet and pigeonpea) through<br />

genetic improvement<br />

KN Rai<br />

I. Sorghum<br />

Output 5A: Hybrid parents and breeding lines of sorghum, pearl millet and pigeonpea with high yield<br />

potential and pro-poor traits in diverse and elite backgrounds, for specific target markets, production<br />

environments and research application made available biennially (from 2008) to defined partners with<br />

associated knowledge and capacity building in the Asian SAT<br />

Activity 5A.1.1: Develop and characterize a diverse range of improved parental lines<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.1: Ten male-sterile lines and five restorer lines with high yield and large grain developed<br />

(BVSR, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Hybrids are popular with the farmers due to heterosis for grain yield and adaptation. Bold grain hybrids (>2.5 g<br />

of 100-grain mass) are desirable. Hybrid parents improved for grain yield with appropriate grain size are<br />

required to develop improved hybrids.<br />

The result of evaluation of B-lines that were completely converted into A-lines and R-lines in the postrainy<br />

season, 2009 and rainy season, <strong>2010</strong> are presented here. The plot size was 2 rows of 2 m length with 75 cm<br />

between the rows and 10 cm between the plants in a row. Selections were made based on yield superiority over<br />

the best check and bold grain size (100 grain weight >2.5 g).<br />

A. Dual- purpose A/B-lines development for rainy season adaptation:<br />

Postrainy season evaluation:<br />

Advanced A 1 -based B-lines trial (ABTA 1 ): Thirteen maintainers of A 1 cytoplasm selected from the<br />

preliminary and advanced A 1 CMS-based B-line trials during the 2008 postrainy season were evaluated along<br />

with two checks (296B and ICSB 52) in ABTA 1 during the 2009 rainy and postrainy seasons. The grain yield<br />

among the B-lines ranged from 3.5 to 6.3 t ha -1 [trial mean: 4.6 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.8]. The B-line, SP07 54425-1<br />

with a grain yield of 6.3 t ha -1 was significantly superior to both the checks, 296B and ICSB 52, by 85% and<br />

26%, respectively.<br />

Advanced A 2 -based B-lines trial (ABTA 2 ): Fifteen maintainers of A 2 cytoplasm selected from the preliminary<br />

and advanced A 2 CMS-based B-line trials during the 2008 postrainy season were evaluated along with two<br />

checks (296B and ICSB 52) in ABTA 2 during the 2009 rainy and postrainy seasons. Two B-lines, SP07 54819-1<br />

(7.4 t ha -1 ) and SP07 54809-1 (6.6 t ha -1 ), were significantly superior to both the checks, 296B (3.6 t ha -1 ) and<br />

ICSB 52 (5.3 t ha -1 ) for grain yield with yield superiority of 25 to 40% over the best check, ICSB 52 [trial mean:<br />

5.3 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.0].<br />

Preliminary B-lines (A 1 cytoplasm based) trial (PBTA 1 ): Maintainers (B-lines) of 55 newly developed malesterile<br />

lines with A 1 CMS system were evaluated along with two checks (296B and ICSB 52) in PBTA 1 during<br />

the 2009 postrainy season. Forty-five B-lines with a grain yield ranging from 2.9 to 6.7 t<br />

ha -1 were numerically superior to the check 296B (2.8 t ha -1 ) of which twelve B-lines were superior to ICSB 52<br />

(5.7 t ha -1 ) by 4 to 18% [trial mean: 4.3 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.6].<br />

Preliminary B-lines (A 2 cytoplasm based) trial (PBTA 2 ) : Maintainers (B-lines) of 34 newly developed malesterile<br />

lines with A 2 CMS system were evaluated along with two checks (296B and ICSB 52) in PBTA 2 during<br />

the 2009 postrainy season. SP 27951 (6.6 t ha -1 ) was significantly superior to the best performing check ICSB<br />

52 (4.9 t ha -1 ) by 35% and six B-lines with a grain yield ranging from 5.5 to 6.6 t ha -1 were significantly<br />

superior to the popular B-line check, 296B (3.8 t ha -1 ) by 45 to 74% [trial mean: 4.4 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.5].<br />

Rainy season evaluation:<br />

Advanced A 1 B-lines trial (ABTA 1 ): Maintainers of 31 male-sterile lines with A 1 cytoplasm selected from the<br />

PBTA 1 and ABTA 1 during the 2009 postrainy season were evaluated in ABTA 1 along with the check 296B<br />

during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Fourteen B-lines with a grain yield of 1.9 to 2.6 t ha -1 were significantly superior<br />

196


to the check, 296B (1.3 t ha -1 ) for grain yield [trial mean: 1.74 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.51]. All these B-lines were<br />

tolerant to grain mold with threshed grain mold rating (TGMR) ranging from 2.0 to 3.7 compared to the<br />

susceptible check, 296B (TGMR: 4.3 on 1 to 9 scale where 1 = no molds and 9 = >90% grain surface area<br />

covered with molds).<br />

Advanced A 2 B-lines trial (ABTA 2 ): Nineteen maintainers on A 2 cytoplasm selected from the PBTA 2 and ABT<br />

during the 2009 postrainy season were evaluated in ABTA 2 along with the check 296B during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy<br />

season. Three B-lines with a grain yield of 2.1 to 2.8 t ha -1 were significantly superior to 296B (1.5 t ha -1 ) for<br />

grain yield [trial mean: 1.5 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.4]. The TGMR score ranged from 2.0 to 2.7 among these lines<br />

(296B: 3.3).<br />

Preliminary A 1 B-lines trial (PBTA 1 ): Maintainers (B-lines) of 83 newly developed male-sterile lines with A 1<br />

CMS system were evaluated along with two checks (296B and ICSB 444) in an augmented design during the<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Twenty B-lines with grain yield ranging from 1.8 t ha -1 to 2.8 t ha -1 were significantly<br />

superior to both the checks, 296B (1.1 t ha -1 ) and ICSB 444 (1.5 t ha -1 ) for grain yield [trial mean: 1.4 t ha -1 , lsd<br />

(5%): 0.3]. The 20 B-lines flowered in 65 to 76 days, had a plant height of 1.4 to 2.1m, grain weight of 1.8 to<br />

2.5 g 100 -1 grains and a TGMR score of 1 to 4. The B-lines SP 20415 and SP 20637 with a TGMR score 1 were<br />

more tolerant to grain mold.<br />

B. Dual-purpose R-line development for rainy season adaptation<br />

From the hybrid parent development program for rainy season adaptation, promising F 5 progenies with restorer<br />

reaction on A 1 and/or A 2 CMS systems were evaluated in replicated yield trials, Preliminary R-lines trial (PRT),<br />

Advanced R-lines trial (ART) and Elite R-lines trial (ERT) during the both rainy and postrainy seasons. The<br />

details are:<br />

Postrainy season evaluation:<br />

White colored advanced R-lines trial (WCART): Eleven R-lines with white colored grains selected from the<br />

preliminary R-line trial, advanced R-lines trial and dual (both A 1 and A 2 ) R-line trial evaluated during the 2008<br />

postrainy season were reevaluated in WCART during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks RS 29,<br />

ICSR 89058, M 35-1 and ICSB 52. Three R-lines FDRT 5, ERT 3 and PRT 45, with grain yield ranging from<br />

5.6 to 6.6 t ha -1 were significantly superior to the best check, RS 29 (2.6 t ha -1 ) by 115 to 153% [trial mean: 2.9 t<br />

ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.8]. These R-lines had grain weight of 2.2 to 3.4 g 100 -1 grains and flowered in 77 days.<br />

Cream colored advanced R-lines trial (CCART): Eighteen R-lines with cream colored grains selected from<br />

the preliminary R-line trial, advanced R-line trial and dual R-line trial evaluated during the 2008 postrainy<br />

season were reevaluated in CCART during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks RS 29, ICSR 89058,<br />

M 35-1 and ICSB 52. The R-line, SP07 93383, with a grain yield of 6.7 t ha -1 was numerically superior and<br />

comparable to the best check, RS 29 (6.5 t ha -1 ) [trial mean: 3.3 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.8]. It flowered in 81 days, had<br />

a height of 1.4m and grain weight of 2.7 g 100 -1 grains.<br />

White colored preliminary R-lines trial (WCPRT): Seventy-three newly developed white grain colored<br />

restorers of A 1 CMS system were reevaluated in a WCPRT along with the checks RS 29, ICSR 89058, M 35-1<br />

and ICSB 52 during the 2009 postrainy season. Eight R-lines (6.4 to 7.8 t ha -1 ) were numerically superior to the<br />

check, RS 29 (6.3 t ha -1 ) for grain yield [trial mean: 3.9 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 2.2]. These lines flowered in 73 to 80<br />

days, had a height of 1.5 to 2.2m and a grain size of 2.6 to 3.1g 100 -1 grains.<br />

Cream colored preliminary R-lines trial (CCPRT): Seventy-six newly developed cream grain colored<br />

restorers on A 1 CMS system were evaluated in a CCPRT along with the checks RS 29, ICSR 89058, M 35-1<br />

and ICSB 52 during the 2009 postrainy season. Three R-lines, SP09 25241-2, SP09 25231-1 and SP09 25268-1,<br />

with a grain yield of 7.7 to 8.0 t ha -1 was significantly superior to the best check, RS 29 (5.4 t ha -1 ) [trial mean:<br />

4.0 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 2.1]. These lines flowered in 74 to 75 days, had a height of 1.5 to 1.7m and a grain size of<br />

2.9 to 3.2g 100 -1 grains.<br />

White colored preliminary varieties trial (WCPVT): Sixty-four newly developed white colored varieties<br />

were evaluated in WCPVT during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks SPV 1616, SPV 475, M 35-<br />

1 and ICSB 52. The variety SP09 25561-1 with a grain yield of 7.4 t ha -1 was significantly superior to the best<br />

check, SPV 1616 (5.3 t ha -1 ), while 16 varieties with grain yield ranging from 5.4 to 6.4 t ha -1 were numerically<br />

superior and comparable to SPV 1616 [trial mean: 3.8 t ha -1 , lsd (5%):1.8]. Among these varieties, SP09 25574-<br />

1 had a large grain size of 3.6g 100 -1 grains (SPV 1616: 2.8 g 100 -1 grains). It will be tested for restorer reaction.<br />

197


Cream colored preliminary varieties trial (CCPVT): Forty-six newly developed cream colored varieties<br />

were evaluated in CCPVT during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks SPV 1616, SPV 475, M 35-1<br />

and ICSB 52. Three varieties SP09 25856-1, SP09 25656-1 and SP09 25640-1 with a grain yield ranging from<br />

5.3 to 6.6 t ha -1 was numerically superior and comparable to the best check, SPV 1616 (5.1 t ha -1 ) [trial mean:<br />

2.8 t ha -1 , lsd (5%):1.6]. These varieties flowered in 79 days (SPV 1616: 73 days), had a plant height of 1.4 to<br />

1.6 m (SPV 1616:1.9 m) and a 100-grain weight of 2.6 to 2.8 g (SPV 1616: 2.8g). They will be tested for<br />

restorer reaction.<br />

Rainy season evaluation:<br />

Advanced white grain colored R-lines trial (WCART): Twenty-six white grain colored R-lines selected from<br />

PRT and ART trials (referred above) conducted during the 2009 postrainy season were reevaluated in WCART<br />

during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with the checks RS 29 and SPV 1616. Compared to the best performing<br />

check RS 29 (1.8 t ha -1 ), one R-line, SP 09 32317-1 (2.5 t ha -1 ) was significantly superior for grain yield and 3<br />

R-lines with the grain yield ranging from 1.9 to 2.0 t ha -1 were numerically superior or comparable to it [trial<br />

mean: 1.3 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.8]. The threshed grain mold resistance (TGMR) scores of the selected lines ranged<br />

from 1.3 to 3.0 (RS 29: 1.7).<br />

Advanced Cream grain colored R-lines trial (CCART): Eighteen cream grain colored R-lines selected from<br />

PRT and ART trials conducted during the 2009 postrainy season were reevaluated in CCART during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

rainy season along with the checks RS 29 and SPV 1616. Compared to the check RS 29 (1.1 t ha -1 ), four R-lines<br />

with the grain yield ranging from 1.6 to 1.9 t ha -1 were significantly superior for grain yield [trial mean: 1.22 t<br />

ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.28]. The grain mold TGMR score, in the selected lines ranged from 1.3 to 2.3 (RS 29: 2.0).<br />

Preliminary R-lines trial (PRT): One hundred sixty-two newly developed R-lines were evaluated in PRT<br />

during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with the checks RS 29 and SPV 1616 in an augmented design. Compared to<br />

the best performing check RS 29 (2.2 t ha -1 ), eight R-lines, with a grain yield ranging from 3.3 to 4.1 t ha -1 , were<br />

significantly superior for grain yield [trial mean: 1.9 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.0]. The grain mold TGMR score ranged<br />

among them from 1.0 to 3.0 (RS 29: 1.0). SP 21657-1 was most tolerant to grain mold with a score of 1.0 (days<br />

to 50% flowering: 74 days and plant height: 2.5 m).<br />

Advanced varieties trial (AVT): Twenty varieties selected from WCPVT and CCPVT during the 2009<br />

postrainy season were evaluated in AVT during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with the check SPV 1616. One<br />

variety, SP09 25640 with a grain yield of 2.5 t ha -1 was numerically superior and comparable to SPV 1616 (2.4 t<br />

ha -1 ) [trial mean: 1.4 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.4]. This variety flowered in 80 days (SPV 1616: 71 days), had a plant<br />

height of 1.9 m (SPV 1616: 2.7 m), grain mold score of 1.7 (SPV 1616: 1.0) and a 100-grain weight of 2.6 g<br />

(SPV 1616: 3.0 g). It will be tested for restorer reaction.<br />

Preliminary varieties trial (PVT): Newly developed 215 varieties were evaluated in PVT during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

rainy season in augmented design along with the checks SPV 1616 and RS 29. Compared to the best performing<br />

check SPV 1616 (3.2 t ha -1 ), eight varieties, with grain yield ranging from 4.2 to 5.5 t ha -1 were significantly<br />

superior for grain yield [trial mean: 2.4 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 0.8]. The grain mold score in the selected lines ranged<br />

from 1.0 to 3.0 (SPV 1616: 3.0). The varieties, SP09 17005-1 and SP09 17046-1, were most tolerant to grain<br />

mold with a TGMR score of 1.0 (days to 50% flowering: 72-73 days and plant height: 1.9-2.1 m). They will be<br />

tested for restorer reaction.<br />

Belum VS Reddy, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.2: Three brown midrib restorer lines with high yield and large grain developed (PSR/ BVSR,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Brown midrib (bmr) color is a morphological marker for low lignin. It is essential to identify the suitable bmr<br />

source having high biomass and digestibility for use in forage breeding as well as to develop high biomass<br />

sorghums amenable for lignocellulosic ethanol production as low lignin reduces processing costs. Introgressed<br />

lines with bmr 6 and bmr12 in different backgrounds that were imported from USDA were evaluated for<br />

biomass and quality in a RCBD trial with three replications (plot size 2 rows of 2 m length with 75cm between<br />

the rows) in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season along with the check RSSV 9. Selection criteria: Tall plant height, more biomass,<br />

bmr score 1, high grain yield, low lignin and high digestibility.<br />

In the entries evaluated, the days to 50% flowering ranged from 54 and 89 days. The plant height ranged from<br />

0.5 to 2.9 m (RSSV 9: 2.7 m). The stalk weight ranged from 6.8 to 51.5 t ha -1 (RSSV 9: 27.3 t ha -1 ). Among the<br />

all genotypes, highest stalk yield was recorded by IS 11861 (51.5 t ha -1 ) followed by IS 23253 (43.7 t ha -1 ) and<br />

198


IS 23789 (43.3 t ha -1 ). Dried bmr line samples were sent to International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) for<br />

lignin quantity analysis.<br />

The lines, IS 11861, IS 23789 and IS 23253 were found to be high biomass lines. Once the results of quality<br />

analysis are available, 3-4 best sources of biomass and quality will be identified and used in the crossing<br />

program. The trial is being repeated in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season for confirmation of the previous results. An<br />

introgression program was initiated by developing 57 F 1 s from the crosses of bmr 6 and bmr12 with high<br />

biomass sweet sorghum varieties in 2009 postrainy season and these are being backcrossed in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy<br />

season.<br />

P Srinivasa Rao and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.3.1: Five new high-yielding and large grain male-sterile lines in diverse backgrounds<br />

developed (BVSR/HDU, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

A wide array of material ranging from F 2 to BC 7 stages from which a number of male-sterile lines can be<br />

identified in diverse backgrounds for rainy and postrainy season adaptations forms the backup materials for<br />

further improvement of male sterile lines for rainy and postrainy seasons adaptation. These materials were<br />

developed from crosses involving diverse parents from germplasm for both rainy and postrainy seasons.<br />

A. Dual-purpose B-line development for rainy season adaptation:<br />

A diverse array of progenies in various generations (F 3 s 975; F 4 s 1359 and F 5 s 34) and testcrosses and<br />

backcrosses in various stages and their progenies (700) were evaluated in nurseries with appropriate checks (296<br />

B and ICSB 101). Lines with grain yield and size better than the checks were selected.<br />

To diversify the hybrid parents for rainy season adaptation, from the crosses between high yielding B-lines,<br />

high-yielding varieties and lustrous germplasm lines, 180 F 4 s, 144 F s s and 7 F 6 s were selected based on grain<br />

yield and agronomic desirability during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>. Further, 49 BC 7 s, 4 BC 6 s and 101 BC 1 s with A 1<br />

cytoplasm were selected for high grain yield and rainy season adaptation. Further, 493 F 6 s were test crossed and<br />

advanced with selection for grain yield and agronomic desirability.<br />

B. Dual-purpose B-line development for postrainy season adaptation:<br />

During the 2009 postrainy season, the following materials were evaluated for bold, round and lustrous grain and<br />

high grain yield in nurseries with M 35-1 and 296 B as checks. These are: F 3 s 833; F 4 s 2377, F 5 s 373 and F 6 s<br />

251. Test crosses and backcrosses in various stages and their progenies (856) were evaluated in nurseries with<br />

appropriate checks (296 B and M 35-1) for conversion and selection. Further, a population with maintainer<br />

reaction with ms 3 is being developed for postrainy season adaptation to provide source materials for selection of<br />

B-lines for postrainy season.<br />

We selected 1249 F 4 s from 833 F 3 s, and a total of 1310 F 5 progenies were selected from 2377 F 4 progenies<br />

based on grain boldness, lustre and yield during the 2009 postrainy season. These included<br />

• 43 F 5 progenies derived from crosses of M 35-1R and M 35-1 bulk with HY B-lines (ICSBs 38, 93, 52,<br />

101)<br />

• 39 F 5 progenies derived from crosses between HY B-lines, M 35-1 bulk and postrainy varieties<br />

including Gidda Maldandi,<br />

• 399 F 5 progenies derived from HY B-lines, lustrous germplasm B-line derivatives × postrainy varieties,<br />

Gidda Maldandi,<br />

• 276 F 5 progenies derived from the crosses between M 35-1 bulk × Gidda Maldandi B-selections,<br />

• 316 F 5 progenies derived from Gidda Maldandi B-selections × M 35-1 bulk and<br />

• 33 F 5 progenies derived from Gidda Maldandi B-selections × postrainy varieties,<br />

• 12 F 5 progenies derived from Gidda Maldandi R × HY B-lines,<br />

• 192 F 5 progenies derived from M 35-1 bulk × HY B-lines and Gidda Maldandi B-lines.<br />

Further, 258 F 6 s (from 373 F 5 s) and 89 F 7 s (from 251 F 6 s) were test crossed and advanced with selection for<br />

grain evident traits like grain size, color and lustre.<br />

During the 2009 rainy season, from the conversion program, 3 BC 7 s (high yielding), 10 BC 6 s (8 Gidda<br />

Maldandi-based and 2 high yielding), 10 BC 4 s (high yielding and shoot fly tolerant) and 68 BC 2 s on A 1<br />

cytoplasm were selected for high grain yield and grain characteristics. In addition, from the crosses involving<br />

high yielding B-lines with lustrous germplasm lines, Gidda Maldandi, M 35-1 bulk, postrainy and high yielding<br />

varieties, 229 BC 1 s were selected from 856 TCs for high grain yield, grain size and lustre, and agronomic<br />

desirability (HOPE project activity 2.3.1A).<br />

199


B-population (ms 3 gene): Ninety-two male steriles and 22 male fertiles were selected based on postrainy<br />

season adaptation grain characteristics – grain size and lustre in 2009 postrainy season, and mixed in 3:1 ratio to<br />

form C 2 bulk. It is being advanced in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

Belum VS Reddy<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.3.2: Five new high sugar-yielding hybrid parents in diverse backgrounds developed (PSR/<br />

BVSR/HDU, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Sweet sorghum hybrids are popular with farmers due to heterosis for biomass, sugar yield and earliness.<br />

Diversification of hybrid parental lines (both B and R-lines) holds the key for exploiting desired levels of<br />

heterosis for sugar yield and allied traits. Owing to high GxE interaction and seasonal adaptation, the entries<br />

screened and selected in rainy season are being advanced to next generation for rainy season screening only and<br />

similar method is being followed for postrainy season.<br />

B-line development:<br />

From a total of 100 F 1 s of elite sweet stalk (RxB) crosses which were made in 2009 postrainy season between<br />

new sweet sorghum varieties, B-lines, germplasm lines with high stem girth, high Brix% and high biomass lines<br />

to develop improved sweet sorghum B-lines. Selections were made based on green stem pith and agronomic<br />

performance. Similarly, F 1 s (BxR) of 183 elite sweet stalk crosses made in 2009 postrainy season between new<br />

sweet sorghum varieties, B-lines, germplasm lines with high girth, high Brix% and high biomass to develop new<br />

sweet sorghum superior B-lines were advanced to F 2 . Sixteen entries from RxB crosses and 36 F 1 s from BxR<br />

crosses were advanced further.<br />

R-line development:<br />

The following progenies obtained from the crosses made involving sweet sorghum varieties and sweet sorghum<br />

germplasm lines were evaluated during the 2009 postrainy season along with checks RSSV 9 and SSV84 that<br />

include 1136 F 5 s (from 1136 F 4 s), 436 F 4 s (from 598 F 3 s), 438 F 3 s(from 234 F 2 s), 294 F 2 s (from 296 F 1 s) for<br />

high Brix%, green pith and biomass.<br />

Further, the following progenies derived from crossing of superior B-lines, R-lines, sweet sorghum lines and<br />

germplasm accessions were screened for stem juiciness, Brix%, high biomass and grain yield during the 2009<br />

postrainy season along with checks RSSV 9 and SSV84. A total of 294 F 2 s (from 296 F 1 s), 438 F 3 s (from 234<br />

F 2 s), 436 F 4 s (from 598 F 3 s) and1136 F 5 s (from 1136 F 4 s) were generated. Progenies derived from the crosses<br />

involving high yielding lines, B-lines, R-lines and sweet sorghum varieties were evaluated in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season<br />

along with checks RSSV 9 and SSV84 and a total of 1011 F 3 s, 784 F 4 s and 985 F 5 s and 163 F6s were generated.<br />

Also 500 F 1 s derived from crossing of superior B-lines, R-lines, improved sweet sorghum lines and germplasm<br />

accessions were screened.<br />

The following progenies were advanced based on stem juiciness, Brix%, high biomass and grain yield during<br />

the in 2009 postrainy season, 294 F 3 s, 822 F 4 s and 1135 F 5 s and 1947 F 6 s. In the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>, 71 F 2 s,<br />

330F 4 s and 39 F 5 s and 64 F 6 s were selected for further screening.<br />

P Srinivasa Rao<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.3.3: Five new high-yielding and large grain restorer lines in diverse backgrounds developed<br />

(BVSR/HDU, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Dual-purpose R-line development<br />

Most of the restorer lines developed for rainy season adaptation are dual--purpose types with medium maturity.<br />

The postrainy season restorers are very limited and they all resemble M 35-1, and some of them do not restore<br />

fertility under low temperatures (


B. Postrainy season adaptation<br />

From the crosses made between postrainy R-lines, varieties, lustrous germplasm lines and M 35-1 tan lines, 218<br />

F 4 selections made for grain boldness, lustre and yield during the 2008 postrainy season and from the crosses<br />

made between postrainy variety, common R-lines (on all CMS systems), Gidda Maldandi, M 35-1 tan bulk, 292<br />

F 4 and 225 F 3 selections made for bold and lustrous grain were evaluated during the 2009 postrainy season in a<br />

nursery with M 35-1 as check. Also, 675 F 5 s and 584 F 6 s obtained from 2008 postrainy season were also<br />

evaluated similarly. Further 721 test crosses were also made in 2009 postrainy season for identifying restorers.<br />

Also, 381 F 1 s made in 2008 postrainy season were advanced in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. A population with ms 3 gene<br />

is also being developed to provide source for selection of R-lines improved for postrainy season adaptation.<br />

Two hundred and sixty two F 2 s, 327 F 4 s, 259 F 5 s, 856 F 6 s and 586 advance progenies (F 7 s) derived from the<br />

crosses involving M 35-1 bulk, postrainy varieties including Gidda Maldandi; and from the crosses involving<br />

high yielding R-lines, postrainy varieties, high yielding varieties and dual R-lines were selected for grain yield<br />

and postrainy season adaptation. The selected progenies and testcrosses are being evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

postrainy season. (HOPE project Activities 2.5.1 to 2.5.3).<br />

R-population (ms 3 gene): Forty male sterile plants and 50 male fertile plants were selected based on postrainy<br />

grain characteristics – grain size and lustre in 2009 postrainy season and mixed in 3:1 ratio to form C 2<br />

population bulk. Postrainy season varieties were crossed on population male sterile plants to derive 18 F 1 s<br />

which are being grown individually during the <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

Belum V S Reddy<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.4.1: Four new male-sterile lines resistant each to shoot fly and grain mold in diverse<br />

backgrounds developed (BVSR/RPT/HCS, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Grain mold and shoot fly are the major biotic constraints of rainy season sorghum affecting the yield and grain<br />

quality. Use of resistant cultivars along with other methods of control was found effective for managing grain<br />

mold and shoot fly in sorghum.<br />

Grain mold resistance donors in red and white grain backgrounds, and shoot fly resistance donors identified in<br />

the germplasm accessions were used in the crossing programs. The selected progenies with maintainer reaction<br />

are being converted into male-sterile lines. The selected advanced progenies with restorer reaction were<br />

evaluated in replicated trials for their grain mold and shoot fly resistance, and agronomic desirability. The<br />

advanced male sterile lines and restorers were evaluated both as lines per se or in hybrid combinations.<br />

A. Dual-purpose B-line development (Advanced)<br />

The B-lines that were completely converted into male-sterile lines were evaluated in replicated yield trials<br />

during the both rainy and postrainy season. Selections were made based on yield superiority over the best check<br />

and bold grain size. The results are as under.<br />

Postrainy season:<br />

Shoot fly hybrids and parents trial (SFHPT)-Postrainy season: We evaluated 18 sorghum shoot fly hybrids<br />

and their parents (18 hybrids, 5 B-lines and 6 R-lines and three controls – IS 18551 - shoot fly resistant, Swarna<br />

- shoot fly susceptible, and CSH 23 - high grain yield hybrid) in a Randomized Complete Block design (RCBD<br />

with 3 replications) for shoot fly resistance in shoot fly screening block and for agronomic performance in<br />

breeding block in 2009 postrainy season. The control hybrid – CSH 23 had 3.1 t ha -1 (trial mean: 4.31; SE+:<br />

0.48) grain yield in breeding block and 64% dead hearts (trial mean: 51.0; SE+: 13.54) in screening block. The<br />

susceptible control Swarna had 66 SFDH% and the resistant control IS 18551 had 16 SFDH%. Three test<br />

hybrids ICSA 29004 x ICSV 25263 (5.7 t ha -1 ; SFDH%: 25), ICSA 29002 x SPV 1411 (5.5 t ha -1 ; SFDH%: 33)<br />

and ICSA 29001 x S 35 (4.6 t ha -1 ; SFDH%: 33), had significantly higher grain yield (by 28 to 58%) over CSH<br />

23 and 34 to 50% less SFDH%.<br />

Shoot fly preliminary B-lines trial (SFPBT)-Postrainy season: We evaluated 15 postrainy season adapted<br />

preliminary B-line progenies (BC 7 s on A 1 ) and 7 BC 6 s on A 2, along with two controls (296B and IS 18551) as<br />

SFPBTA 1 and SFPBTA 2 for shoot fly resistance in screening block and for grain yield assessment in breeding<br />

block in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

Screening of B-lines for shoot fly resistance: New postrainy season B-lines (38) were evaluated along with<br />

three checks in a three-replicated RCBD during the 2009 postrainy season for shoot fly resistance. The B-lines<br />

were screened for shoot fly resistance using interlards fishmeal technique. The B-lines SP 27703 (21%) and SP<br />

201


27719 (22%) were the top two resistant lines though numerically not superior to the checks (IS 18551: 7.5%;<br />

Swarna: 13%). The B-lines selected from RPBT and RLBT are being screened for shoot fly resistance in during<br />

the 2009 postrainy season (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.6).<br />

Rainy season:<br />

Grain mold hybrids and parents trial (GMHPT): We evaluated 22 sorghum grain mold hybrids and their<br />

parents (22 hybrids, 7 B-lines and 7 R-lines and four controls – IS 14384 - grain mold resistant, SPV 104 - grain<br />

mold susceptible, CSH 23 - high grain yield hybrid and 296 B - high grain yield B-line) in RCBD with 3<br />

replications for grain mold resistance in grain mold screening block under sprinkler irrigation and for agronomic<br />

performance in breeding block in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The control hybrid – CSH 23 had 3.2 t ha -1 grain yield<br />

(trial mean: 2.91; SE+: 0.30) in breeding block and panicle grain mold rating (PGMR) score 4.4 (trial mean:<br />

3.53; SE+: 0.58) taken on scale 1 to 9 where 1 = no mold and 9= >90% mold. Three test hybrids ICSA 29014 x<br />

SPV 1411 (5.6 t ha -1 ; PGMR score: 1.5), ICSA 29016 x SPV 1411 (5.0 t ha -1 ; PGMR score: 1.6) and ICSA<br />

29013 x SPV 1411 (4.1 t ha -1 ; PGMR score: 1.7), had significantly higher grain yield (by 15 to 60%) with lesser<br />

PGMR score (by 55 to 61%) over CSH 23.<br />

Grain mold advanced B-lines trial (GMABT-A 1 )-Rainy season: We evaluated 37 advanced B-line progenies<br />

(37 BC 8 s on A 1 ) along with four controls (296B, ICSB 101, SPV 104, IS 14384) as GMABTA 1 in RCBD with 3<br />

replications for grain mold resistance in grain mold screening block and for agronomic performance in breeding<br />

block in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The controls 296 B and ICSB 101, respectively had 2.0 and 3.3 t ha -1 (trial mean:<br />

2.65; SE+: 0.31) grain yield in breeding block and PGMR score 7.1 and 5.2 (trial mean: 3.87; SE+: 0.45) taken<br />

on scale 1 to 9 where 1 = no mold and 9= >90% mold in screening block evaluated under sprinkler irrigation.<br />

Twenty-four B-line progenies had significantly higher grain yield (by 16 to 57%) over 296 B ranging from 2.7<br />

to 3.6 t ha -1 with significantly less PGMR score 2.6 to 5.5 (by 18 to 64%) . . One B-line progeny (SP 43543-1)<br />

had better grain yield (3.6 t ha -1 ) and better PGMR score 3.9 than ICSB 101 (grain yield: 3.3 t ha -1 : PGMR: 5.2).<br />

Grain mold preliminary A 2- B-lines trial (GMPBT-A 2 )-Rainy season: We evaluated seven preliminary A 2 B-<br />

line progenies (5 BC 8 s A 2 , and 2 BC 7 s A 2 ) along with four controls (296B, ICSB 101, SPV 104, IS 14384) as<br />

GMPBTA 2 in RCBD (3 replications) for grain mold resistance in screening block and grain yield assessment in<br />

breeding block in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The controls 296 B and ICSB 101, respectively had 1.9 and 1.5 t ha -1 (trial<br />

mean: 2.49; SE+: 0.28) for grain yield in breeding block and PGMR score 6.3 and 4.3 (trial mean: 4.42; SE+:<br />

0.21) taken on scale 1 to 9 where 1 = no mold and 9= >90% mold in screening block evaluated under sprinkler<br />

irrigation. Four B-line progenies (SPs 43613-2, 43623-1, 43615-1, and SP 43619-1) had significantly higher<br />

grain yield (by 17 to 50%) ranging from 2.6 to 3.3 t ha -1 with significantly less (by 34 to 43%) PGMR score 3.7<br />

to 4.3 over 296 B.<br />

Shoot fly hybrids and parents trial (SFHPT)-Rainy season: We evaluated 18 sorghum shoot fly hybrids and<br />

their parents (18 hybrids, 5 B-lines and 6 R-lines and three controls – IS 18551 - shoot fly resistant, Swarna -<br />

shoot fly susceptible, and CSH 23 - high grain yield hybrid) in RCBD with 3 replications for shoot fly<br />

resistance in shoot fly screening block and for agronomic performance in breeding block in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

The control hybrid – CSH 23 had 2.3 t ha -1 (trial mean: 1.65; SE+: 0.21) for grain yield in breeding block and<br />

SFDH% 89 (trial mean: 79.90; SE+: 7.75) in screening block. The susceptible control Swarna had 72% SFDHs<br />

and the resistant control IS 18551 had 50% SFDHs. Deadheart incidence in the test entries ranged from 37.0 to<br />

96.7%. CSB 29002, ICSB 29005, and ICSB 29006 suffered


2 had significantly 25 and 18 less SFDH% than ICSB 409 and 296 B respectively; while SP 44255-2 was on par<br />

with ICSB 409 and 296 B for SFDH%.<br />

Shoot fly preliminary A 1- B-lines trial (SFPBT-A 1 )-Rainy season: We evaluated 81 rainy season adapted A 1<br />

preliminary B-line progenies (BC 6 s on A 1 ) along with three controls (296B, IS 18551, Swarna) as SFPBTA 1 in<br />

RCBD with 3 replications for shoot fly resistance in shoot fly screening block and for agronomic performance in<br />

breeding block in rainy season. The control 296 B had 1.1 t ha -1 (trial mean: 1.57; SE+: 0.19) grain yield in<br />

breeding block and shoot fly dead hearts percentage (SFDH %) 86 (trial mean: 82.70; SE+: 6.94) in screening<br />

block. Deadheart incidence in the test entries ranged from 48.4 to 99.2%, and five maintainer lines suffered<br />


Thirty eight new B-lines with postrainy season adaptation were evaluated along with three checks in a threereplicated<br />

RBD design during the 2009 postrainy season in three separate trials – 1) grain yield and other<br />

agronomic traits, 2) charcoal rot resistance and 3) shoot fly resistance.<br />

a) Eight B-lines had higher grain yield ranging from 4.6 to 6.1 t ha -1 and two of them, SP 27711-1 and SP<br />

27697-1, were significantly superior to the popular postrainy B-line check, ICSB 52 (4.6 t ha -1 ) while<br />

four of them were superior to the popular rainy season B-line check, 296B (3.6 t ha -1 ). Grain luster<br />

score of the eight B-lines ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 (ICSB 52: 2.0; 296B: 3.0). Grain size among them<br />

ranged from 1.2 to 1.9 g 100 -1 grains (ICSB 52: 1.6 m; 296B: 1.3 m). The plant height of the eight B-<br />

lines ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 (ICSB 52: 2.0; 296B: 3.0) while they flowered in 74 to 80 days (ICSB 52:<br />

69 days, 296B: 74 days).<br />

b) The B-lines were screened for charcoal rot by artificial inoculation under field conditions and two<br />

promising lines (27543-1 and 27715-1) with a charcoal rot score of


Screening of sweet sorghum hybrids for shoot fly resistance:<br />

A total of 40 sweet sorghum advanced sweet sorghum hybrids were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season with<br />

IS 18551 as resistant check and Swarna as susceptible checks in RCBD. 2. A total of 35 sweet sorghum elite<br />

hybrids were evaluated in RCBD with IS 2205 as a resistant check and Swarna as a susceptible check. In the<br />

advanced hybrids, dead heart incidence varied from 9 to 98%.Three out of forty lines ICSV 700 (9%), ICSV 705<br />

(17%) and ICSV 93046 (18%) had 9 to 18 % less shoot fly dead heart incidence compared to susceptible check<br />

Swarna (37%). Dead heart incidence in the elite hybrids varied from Nil in ICSA 433 × SPV 422, ICSA 433 ×<br />

ICSV 93046, ICSA 731 × ICSV 93046 to 28 % in SP 97030 × SPV 422 compared to 1 % in resistant check IS<br />

18551 and 13 % in susceptible check Swarna.<br />

A total of 138 sweet sorghum advanced hybrids were evaluated during the in 2009 postrainy season in RCBD<br />

with IS 18551 as a resistant check and Swarna as a susceptible check. Dead heart incidence in the advance<br />

hybrids varied from 10- 88%, forty six out of 138 advanced hybrids had 1-45 % less to shoot fly dead heart<br />

incidence compared to susceptible check, Swarna (75%).<br />

P Srinivasa Rao, Belum VS Reddy and HC Sharma<br />

Eighty-four QTL-derived BC 4 F4 progenies (296B x IS 18551) were evaluated for resistance to shoot fly, A.<br />

soccata under interlard fishmeal technique in the field, along with the resistant check, IS 18551. Data were<br />

recorded on leaf glossiness score, plants with eggs, and deadheart incidence at 14 and 21 days after seedling<br />

emergence. Leaf glossiness scores of the derived lines varied from 1.0 to 5.0 compared to 1.0 in the resistant<br />

check, IS 18551. There were 75.4 to 100.0% plants with deadhearts at 28 days after seedling emergence. In<br />

another trial, 64 entries (BC4F6 progenies from BT x 623 x IS 18551) were evaluated for shoot fly resistance.<br />

The leaf glossiness scores of the derived lines varied from 1 to 5 compared to 1 in the resistant check, IS 18551.<br />

There were 74.4 to 100.0% plants with deadhearts at 28 days after seedling emergence.<br />

HC Sharma, CT Hash and S Deshpande<br />

Screening of sweet sorghum hybrids for stem borer resistance:<br />

It is important to have resistance to stem borer in sweet sorghum cultivars to realize high sugar yield as the<br />

tunneling in the stalks and the resulting deadheart formation severely reduce Brix% and juice yield. A total of 98<br />

sweet sorghum advanced B-lines were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season in RCBD with IS 2205 as a<br />

resistant check and Swarna as a susceptible check. The dead heart formation was Nil in ICSB 475 & SP 4495.<br />

Nine lines recorded 5-85 % less shoot fly dead hearts (Swarna: 4%).<br />

P Srinivasa Rao, Belum VS Reddy and HC Sharma<br />

Screening of B-lines for resistance to charcoal rot:<br />

It is important to check the lines intended for postrainy season for tolerance to charcoal rot. New B-lines<br />

selected for postrainy season adaptation (38) were evaluated for charcoal rot resistance by artificial inoculation<br />

under field conditions along with two checks (ICSB 52 and 296B) in a three-replicated RCBD during the 2009<br />

postrainy season. The inoculated plants in test lines were scored for charcoal rot severity at the physiological<br />

maturity (25-35 days after inoculation) on a 1 to 5 scale, where:1 = one inter node invaded, but rot does not pass<br />

through any nodal area; and 5 = most internodes extensively invaded, leading shredding of stalk and lodging of<br />

plant. Two promising lines (27543-1 and 27715-1) with a charcoal rot score of


lustrous germplasm lines; 790 F 3 from crosses involving B-line parents and HYB, M 35-1 bulk, Gidda Maldandi,<br />

and 52 F 3 s from crosses involving brown mid rib lines and 375 F 2 s (involving B-line parents and shoot fly<br />

resistant germplasm lines and varieties, Gidda Maldandi, M 35-1 Tan, postrainy season varieties, bold grain<br />

lines from Yemen, Eritrea and Muskwari sorghums) were evaluated in the postrainy season for further selection<br />

and screening for resistance to shoot fly. A total of 190 F 4 progenies were generated from 323 F 3 progenies<br />

(crosses involving B-line parents and M 35-1 selections, SPV 1359, HYB, lustrous germplasm lines) and 995 F 4<br />

progenies were selected from 790 F 3 progenies (crosses involving B-line parents and HYB, M 35-1 bulk, Gidda<br />

Maldandi) and 64 F 4 progenies involving brown-midrib germplasm with high -yielding bold grain B-lines were<br />

selected based on grain yield and postrainy season adaptation during the 2009 postrainy season.<br />

A total of 982 F 3 progenies were selected from 375 F 2 populations (involving B-line parents and shoot fly<br />

resistant germplasm lines and varieties, Gidda Maldandi, M 35-1 Tan, postrainy season varieties, bold grain<br />

lines from Yemen, Eritrea and Muskwari sorghums) based on grain boldness, lustre and yield during the 2009<br />

postrainy season, and these are being evaluated in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

Belum VS Reddy and HC Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.2.1.1.2: Forty F 6 lines developed for resistance to each of grain mold and shoot fly<br />

(AAK/BVSR/RPT/HCS/RS, 2011)<br />

Grain mold resistance donors in red and white grain backgrounds and shoot fly resistance donors identified in<br />

the germplasm accessions were used in the crossing programs. The selected advanced progenies with restorer<br />

reaction were evaluated in replicated trials for their grain mold and shoot fly resistance and agronomic<br />

desirability. The results were as follows:<br />

1. Advancing 254 F 5 s derived from the crosses between high Fe and Zn lines and adapted B and R- lines<br />

and un-adapted germplasm lines for grain mold tolerance in 2009 postrainy season resulted in the<br />

generation of 153 F 6 s based on agronomic desirability. These 153 F 6 s were evaluated with three controls<br />

(296 B- high yielding B-line, IS 14384 – grain mold resistant control and SPV 104 grain mold susceptible<br />

control) in RCBD (3 replications) for grain mold resistance in screening block under sprinkler irrigation<br />

in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The F 6 progenies ranged for panicle grain mold rating (PGMR) score from 2.0 to<br />

7.6 taken on scale 1 to 9 where 1 = no mold and 9= >90% mold. The controls 296B, IS 14384 and SPV<br />

104 had PGMR score 6.9, 1.0 and 7.6, respectively (trial mean: 3.6; SE+: 0.52). Eighty three F 6 s had<br />

PGMR score below trial mean score (3.6) and selected 118 F 7 s progenies for advancing and test crossing<br />

in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

2. Advancing 400 F 4 progenies derived from the crosses between grain mold resistant lines and high<br />

yielding B-lines in 2009 postrainy season resulted in the generation of 400 F 5 s. These 400 F 5 progenies<br />

were grown for further advancement and test crossing in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season in breeding block and<br />

selected 156 F 6 s/test crosses. These were grown in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

3. Advancing 403 F 3 progenies derived from the crosses between shoot fly resistant lines and high yielding<br />

B-lines in 2009 postrainy season resulted in the generation of 300 F 4 s. These were grown as nursery in<br />

breeding block for B-line development with shoot fly resistance in low fertility condition to provide<br />

normal shoot fly conditions in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Test crossing was also carried out and selected 30<br />

F 5 s/test crosses based on agronomic desirability and grown in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season.<br />

4. Evaluation of F 1 s for shoot fly resistance (141), grain mold resistance (17) and Fe and Zn rich parents<br />

(34) developed separately using new sources for shoot fly resistance and for grain mold resistance from<br />

germplasm and high yielding B-lines resulted in the selection of 192 F 2 s (SF: 141; GM: 17 and Fe and<br />

Zn: 34).<br />

5. Parents (51) were selected and planted in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season to make new F 1 crosses to develop<br />

shoot fly resistant B-lines.<br />

A Ashok Kumar, Belum VS Reddy, RP Thakur,<br />

Rajan Sharma and HC Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.2.1.2: Two F 6 RIL population (300 lines each) developed for mapping grain mold resistance<br />

(CTH/BVSR/SPD/RPT/RS, 2008)<br />

Based on the genetic diversity studies, three pairs of resistant and susceptible parental lines with dissimilarity<br />

indices of >0.50 were crossed to develop RIL mapping populations for mapping genomic regions contributing to<br />

sorghum grain mold resistance. These segregating mapping populations based on biparental crosses segregating<br />

for grain mold resistance were advanced from F 5 generation to F 6 generation during the rainy season of <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Numbers of progenies advanced in the 3 population are: 346 from Bulk Y-P1 × ICSB 377-P1, 389 from SP<br />

206


2417-P3 × IS 41397-3-P6 and 376 from ICSB 370-2-9-P2 × IS 8219-P1. The harvested F 6 seed will be sown for<br />

a final seed increase during the late post rainy <strong>2010</strong> to constitute the RIL populations.<br />

CT Hash, Rajan Sharma, RP Thakur and SP Deshpande<br />

Activity 5A.4.1: Understanding host-pathogen-environment interaction in grain mold complex<br />

Milestone 5A.4.1.1: Major grain mold pathogens in sorghum growing states in India identified and their<br />

distribution in relation to whether factors determined (RPT/RS,2007)<br />

Grain mold severity scores on grain samples from Sorghum Grain Mold Virulence Nursery (SGMVN)<br />

conducted at five locations (Akola, Parbhani, Palem and Patancheru) for three rainy seasons 2002, 2003 and<br />

2004 indicated that Fusarium spp., Curvularia lunataand and Alternaria alternata are more prominent than<br />

other fungi associated with the grain mold. Since Tmin and Rmax during flowering to physiological maturity are<br />

most critical for mold development, we studied the distribution of pathogenic fungi in relation to these weather<br />

variables. It appears that Tmin 18-20 o C and relative humidity (Rmax) around 80% favored Curvularia at Akola<br />

and higher humidity (Rmax around 90%) and almost same Tmin favored Alternaria at Patancheru. High Tmin<br />

favors Fusarium as the fungus was predominant at Parbhani having Tmin around 22 o C.<br />

RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.4.1.2: Mycotoxim-producing isolates of Fusarium species associated with grain mold identified<br />

and characterized, and genetic resistance in relation to other major pathogens determined<br />

(RPT/BVSR/RS,2009)<br />

A total of 672 isolates of Fusarium were collected from naturally molded sorghum grains from five locations<br />

(Akola, Parbhani, Patancheru, Palem and Surat) in India during 2003-05. Sixty-three representative isolates<br />

were selected to study genetic relatedness/diversity through amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)<br />

and sequence based identification. Five EcoR1-Mse1 AFLP primer combinations (Etg + Mcag, Eaa + Mctt, Eac<br />

+ Mcag, Etc + Mctt and Etg + Mcag), were examined in the 63 isolates. AFLP profiles were used to construct a<br />

binary matrix and the data were then analyzed using Numerical Taxonomy System Version 2.2 (NTSYSpc).<br />

DNA sequence variation was assessed by sequencing part of α-Elongation factor (EF1) using the gene-specific<br />

primer pair using BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit on ABI3130XL (Applied Biosystems, California,<br />

USA). The sequences were aligned through CLUSTAL W. The dissimilarity index was calculated from the<br />

aligned sequences of different isolates using ‘Simple matching’ option in DARwin and a weighted neighbor<br />

joining tree was constructed. Sequences of the EF1-PCR fragments were searched against those in the NCBI<br />

database using BLAST for species identification.<br />

A high level of polymorphism was observed among isolates following selective amplification with 5 AFLP<br />

primer combinations. The dendrogram generated from the AFLP data revealed genetic diversity among the<br />

isolates. Five major groups were identified and the isolates of the same species clustered together. The<br />

sequences of EF-1α gene from each of the 63 Fusarium isolates (query) were compared to those from various<br />

known species of Fusarium (subject) in the NCBI database. Five species of Fusarium – F. proliferatum, F.<br />

thapsinum, F. equiseti, F. andiyazi and F. sacchari were identified based on sequence similarity. Neighbor<br />

joining tree constructed using α-Elongation factor gene sequence of test isolates clustered the isolates of the<br />

same species in the distinct groups. F. thapsinum was identified as predominant species in Fusarium – grain<br />

mold complex in India.<br />

Fumonisins-producing potential of 63 isolates of Fusarium was assessed through ELISA. Strains of F.<br />

proliferatum were identified as highly toxigenic for fumonisins production followed by F. andiyazi. Isolate F<br />

242 (F. proliferatum) was the highest fumonisin (B 1 ) producing strain (476539 µg kg -1 seed). Ten of the 12 F.<br />

proliferatum isolates produced high levels (>28000 µg kg -1 seed) of fumonisins, whereas two isolates F316 and<br />

F 953 produced less (100000 µg kg -1 seed) of fumonisin. Strains of F. thapsinum, F. equiseti, and F. sacchari<br />

were non-fumonisin producers, however, one isolate of F. thapsinum (F88) produced good amount of fumonisin.<br />

One isolate of F. sacchari (F 22) and two isolates of F. thapsinum (F 241 and F 329) produced about 1500 µg<br />

fumonisin kg -1 seed. Highly toxigenic isolates FM 22, 88, 234, 242 and 943 were selected to prove their<br />

pathogenicity. Panicles of Bulk Y and 296B were spray inoculated with the conidial suspension of these isolates<br />

and pathogenicity was confirmed by visualizing the grain colonization by the test strains of Fusarium using<br />

blotter test.<br />

Rajan Sharma and RP Thakur<br />

207


Milestone 5A.4.1.3: Relative contributions of host and environmental factors in mold development assessed<br />

(RPT/BVSR/RS,<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Influence of weather variables on sorghum grain mold development. We studied the influence of weather<br />

variables, temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) on sorghum grain mold development. The T and RH data,<br />

and grain mold severity scores on grain samples of 32 sorghum lines collected from an ICAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

collaborative Sorghum Grain Mold Resistance Stability Nursery (SGMRSN) conducted at four locations<br />

(Coimbatore, Dharwad, Parbhani and Patancheru) for two rainy seasons 2005 and 2006 were used for this study.<br />

The weekly averages (across locations and seasons) of T (Tmax and Tmin) and RH (RHmax and RHmin) for a<br />

2-month post-flowering period (grain-filling to physiological maturity period) were correlated against the<br />

average grain mold severity scores. Positive and significant (P ≤ 0.05) correlations (r = 0.83-0.95) were found<br />

between average weekly Tmin (18.5 to 22.5 C) during the standard 37 th and 38 th week (the 1 st and 2 nd weeks<br />

after panicle emergence) and the average grain mold severity of sorghum lines. This two week period coincided<br />

with the anthesis and ovary fertilization stages of most sorghum lines during which time infection by mold<br />

pathogens took place. Similarly, another significant positive correlation (r = 0.89-0.97) was found between the<br />

average RHmax (76 to 96%) during the standard 41st and 42 nd week (the 5 th and 6 th week after panicle<br />

emergence) and the average grain mold severity. This period, for most sorghum lines, coincided with harddough<br />

to physiological maturity stages, and during this period infected grains, under high humidity conditions,<br />

showed rapid colonization by various mold fungi. Such infected grains developed growth of other saprophytic<br />

fungi as well when left in the field beyond physiological maturity. The regression analyses showed a near-linear<br />

relationship between Tmin and grain mold severity scores (R 2 = 0.96-0.99), and between RHmax and grain mold<br />

severity scores (R 2 = 0.98-0.99) (Fig. 1). Thus, the two most important weather variables, Tmin during anthesis<br />

to fertilization stage and RHmax during hard-dough to grain maturity stage appeared critical for infection and<br />

grain colonization by major mold pathogens (species of Fusarium, Curvularia, Alternaria and Phoma) in the<br />

sorghum grain mold complex. Detailed analysis of weather variables and grain mold severity for individual<br />

locations can be done to develop a prediction model to better manage the risk of grain mold in sorghum.<br />

37 Wk Temp Min<br />

42 Wk Rh Max<br />

23<br />

23<br />

y = -1.514x 3 + 11.88x 2 - 28.95x + 43.12<br />

R² = 0.998<br />

95<br />

91<br />

y = -1.870x 3 + 11.39x 2 - 12.85x + 78.24<br />

R² = 0.987<br />

Temp Min<br />

22<br />

22<br />

RH Max<br />

87<br />

83<br />

21<br />

79<br />

21<br />

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0<br />

Grain mold rating<br />

75<br />

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0<br />

Grain mold rating<br />

Fig. 1. Relationship between grain mold development, and minimum temp and maximum relative humidity (RH)<br />

Association of physio-morphological traits (host factor) with grain mold resistance<br />

Fifty morphologically diverse sorghum germplasm accessions were screened in grain mold nursery for disease<br />

reaction. The grain mold evaluation was carried out under natural infection with high humidity (>90%RH)<br />

provided by overhead sprinklers for 30 min twice a day on rain free days till physiological maturity of the grains.<br />

The experiment was conducted in RCBD with two replications, 1 rows of 2m length/replication. The grain mold<br />

severity was recorded on a progressive 1-9 scale.<br />

Data were recorded for agronomic traits such as days to 50% flowering and plant height (cm); and<br />

morphological traits such as panicle type, glumes coverage (%) and, glumes and grain color to determine<br />

association of these traits with grain mold resistance. The variation in qualitative morphological traits, such as<br />

panicle type, glumes color and grain color were assigned numerical ratings following the DUS (Distinctiveness,<br />

Uniformity and Stability) ratings developed by National Research Centre for Sorghum to facilitate statistical<br />

analysis.<br />

The association studies did not show high correlations between plant traits and grain mold reaction. However,<br />

significant negative correlations were observed for grain mold severity with grain color (r = -0.45, P


Milestone 5A.4.2.1: Insect – host genotype - natural enemy interactions and mechanisms of resistance and their<br />

inheritance studied in sorghum (HCS/BVSR, 2009).<br />

Sorghum is damaged by several insect pests, of which shoot fly - Ahterigona soccat, spotted stem borer - Chilo<br />

partellus, sorghum midge - Stenodiplosis sorghicola, and head bugs - Calocoris angustatus and Eurystylus oldi),<br />

are serious pests of grain sorghum worldwide, and host plant resistance is an important component for the<br />

management of these pests. Therefore, we evaluated identified sources and improved genotypes for multiple<br />

resistance to these pests to identify lines with resistance/tolerance to more than one insect species, and to<br />

understand the resistance mechanism for use in sorghum improvement.<br />

Identify sorghum lines with multiple resistance to insect pests<br />

To identify sorghum lines with multiple resistance to insect pests, and to understand the resistance mechanisms<br />

and diversity among the lines that have been identified earlier to be resistant to different insect pests (sorghum<br />

shoot fly - Atherigona soccata, spotted stem borer - Chilo partellus, sorghum midge - Stenodiplosis sorghicola,<br />

and head bugs - Calocoris angustatus and Eurystylus oldi), over 300 lines were evaluated for resistance to shoot<br />

fly, stem borer, midge, and head bugs. The lines showing high levels of resistance to different insect pests or<br />

having high to moderate levels of resistance to 2 to 3 insect pests and better agronomic desirability were<br />

selected for further testing for resistance to all the four insect species during the 2009 rainy season. The material<br />

was divided into three groups; early-, medium-, and long-duration.<br />

One hundred lines belonging to short (


In the postrainy season short-duration midge screening nursery, the midge damage scores ranged from 1.0 to 8.3,<br />

and 29 genotypes showed high levels of resistance (DR


spreading the aphids, suggesting that clipping the aphid infested leaf to the 5 th leaf of the plants at the boot leaf<br />

stage was quite effective in screening for aphid resistance<br />

Identification of sources of resistance<br />

Thirty-one sorghum lines comprising of improved breeding lines and germplasm accessions were screened for<br />

resistance during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. There were three replications, and observations were recorded at<br />

physiological maturity on aphid damage (1 = 80% leaf area damaged). The<br />

aphid damage scores ranged from 3.5 to 7.5, and the genotypes 61510, 61523, 61588, 61592, IS 40620, SLR 39,<br />

DJ 6514, and PU 10-1 exhibited a leaf damage rating of


RLBT during the 2009 postrainy season in a three-replicated RCBD along with the checks 296B, ICSB 52, M<br />

35-1 and SPV 1411. Compared to the best B-line check, ICSB 52, seven B-lines with the grain yield ranging<br />

from 5.0 to 6.0 t ha -1 were significantly superior by 32 to 58% [trial mean: 4.5 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.1]. Among<br />

these B-lines, the grain lustre score (taken on a 1 to 3 scale, where 1 = most lustrous and 3 = least lustrous)<br />

ranged from 2.0 to 2.7 (ICSB 52: 2.0, 296B: 3.0), grain size ranged from 2.3 to 3.2 g 100 -1 grains (ICSB 52: 3.3,<br />

296B: 2.2). These lines flowered in 70 to 75 days (ICSB 52: 71 days, 296B: 73 days) and had a plant height of<br />

1.3 to 1.7 m (ICSB 52: 1.7m, 296B: 1.2 m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.6). The above B-lines will be evaluated<br />

for their combining ability in hybrid combinations.<br />

Postrainy preliminary B-lines trial (RPBT): Thirty-eight new B-lines developed from the Gidda Maldandi ×<br />

296B, M 35-1 Bulk × ICSB 93, HY B-lines × HY B-lines crosses were evaluated in RPBT during the 2009<br />

postrainy season in a three-replicated RCBD along with the checks 296B and ICSB 52. Compared to the best B-<br />

line check, ICSB 52 (4.6 t ha -1 ), four B-lines, SP 27711-1 (6.1 t ha -1 ), SP 27697-1 (5.9 t ha -1 ), SP 27631-1 (5.6 t<br />

ha -1 ) and SP 27619-1 (5.1 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior by 11 to 33% [trial mean: 3.8 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.2].<br />

Among these B-lines, the grain lustre score ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 (ICSB 52: 2.0, 296B: 3.0), grain size ranged<br />

from 2.2 to 3.3 g 100 -1 grains (ICSB 52: 3.4, 296B: 2.5). These lines flowered in 74 to 80 days (ICSB 52: 69<br />

days, 296B: 74 days) and had a plant height of 1.3 to 1.9 m (ICSB 52: 1.6 m, 296B: 1.3 m) (HOPE Project<br />

Activity 2.3.6). The above B-lines will be evaluated for their combining ability in hybrid combinations.<br />

Postrainy elite R-lines and varieties trial (REVRT): Thirty-two postrainy season adapted varieties and<br />

restorer lines selected from REVRT, RPRT, RAVT conducted during the 2008 postrainy season were evaluated<br />

during the 2009 postrainy season in a three-replicated RCBD along with the checks M 35-1 and SPV 1411.<br />

Compared to the best check SPV 1411 (4.6 t ha -1 ), 10 varieties/R-lines were numerically superior by 2 to 28%<br />

[trial mean: 4.1 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.5]. Four lines had tan plant color. Among these lines, the grain lustre score<br />

ranged from 1.3 to 2.7 (SPV 1411: 1.7, M 35-1: 2.3), grain size (g 100 -1 grains) ranged from 2.8 to 3.7 (SPV<br />

1411: 3.4, M 35-1: 2.9). These lines flowered in 72 to 78 days (SPV 1411: 76 days, M 35-1: 71 days) and had a<br />

plant height of 1.7 to 2.5 m (SPV 1411: 2.3 m, M 35-1: 2.1m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.10A).<br />

Postrainy preliminary varietal trial-1 (RPVT-1): A total of 57 new postrainy season adapted varieties were<br />

evaluated in RPVT-1 during the 2009 postrainy season in a three-replicated RCBD along with the checks 296B,<br />

M 35-1 and SPV 1411. Twenty-three varieties with grain yield ranging from 4.4 to 6.6 t ha -1 were numerically<br />

superior or comparable to the best performing check M 35-1 (4.4 t ha -1 ) for grain yield. Of these, five varieties<br />

(6.0 to 6.6 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior by 36 to 50% [trial mean: 4.1 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.5]. These varieties<br />

had a lustre score of 1.3 to 2.3 (M 35-1: 2.0, SPV 1411: 1.3), grain size (g 100 -1 grains) of 3.1 to 3.4 (M 35-1:<br />

3.0, SPV 1411: 3.4). They flowered in 73 to 80 days (M 35-1: 73 days, SPV 1411: 76 days) and had plant<br />

height of 2.2 to 2.5 m (M 35-1: 2.3 m, SPV 1411: 2.4 m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.10A).<br />

Postrainy preliminary varietal trial-2 (RPVT-2): A total of 83 new postrainy season adapted varieties were<br />

evaluated in RPVT-2 during the 2009 postrainy season in a three-replicated RCBD along with the checks CSV<br />

18R, M 35-1 and SPV 1411. Forty-one varieties with grain yield ranging from 2.8 to 5.2 t ha -1 were numerically<br />

superior or comparable to the check M 35-1 (2.8 t ha -1 ) for grain yield [trial mean: 2.8 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.7]. Of<br />

these, three varieties (4.6 to 5.2 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior by 64 to 86%. These varieties had a lustre<br />

score of 1.0 to 2.0 (M 35-1: 2.3, SPV 1411: 1.0), grain size (g 100 -1 grains) of 3.2 to 3.6 (M 35-1: 3.2, SPV<br />

1411: 3.8). They flowered in 76 to 78 days (M 35-1: 75 days, SPV 1411: 77 days) and had plant height of 1.8 to<br />

2.4 m (M 35-1: 2.1 m, SPV 1411: 2.4 m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.10A).<br />

Postrainy Advanced Varieties Trial (RAVT): A total of eight varieties released for cultivation in postrainy<br />

season were evaluated in a RAVT during the 2009 postrainy season. The trial was conducted in a RCBD with 3<br />

replications along with the checks CSH 18R and CSH 25. Compared to the hybrid check CSH 18R (4.5 t ha -1 ),<br />

six varieties were numerically superior by 4 to 24% or comparable to it [trial mean: 4.7 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.1].<br />

The grain size (g 100 -1 grains) of the lines varied from 3.1 to 3.7 (CSH 18R: 3.6). These lines flowered in 74 to<br />

80 days (CSH 18R: 81 days) and had plant height of 2.3 to 2.9m (CSH 18R: 2.6m). All the lines and the check<br />

had a grain luster score of 2 (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.10A).<br />

2. Hybrids performance<br />

Postrainy advanced hybrid trial (RAHT): Eight promising postrainy season adapted hybrids selected from<br />

advanced hybrid trial conducted during the 2008 postrainy season were evaluated in a three replicated RCBD<br />

during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks, M 35-1, SPV 1411, CSH 18 and CSH 25. Two<br />

hybrids, ICSA 20 × ICSR 93009 (6.1 t ha -1 ) and ICSA 563 × ICSR 93030 (6.0 t ha -1 ), were and comparable to<br />

the best hybrid check CSH 18 (5.9 t ha -1 ) [trial mean: 2.6 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.2]. The grain size (g 100 -1 grains) in<br />

212


the two hybrids ranged from 3.3 to 3.4 (CSH 18: 3.7 g 100 -1 grain), grain lustre score was 2.0 (CSH 18: 2.0, M<br />

35-1: 2.0). They flowered in 73 days (CSH 18: 81 days) and the plant height ranged from 2.3 to 2.5 m (CSH 18:<br />

2.9 m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.4.6). The above parents of the two selected hybrids are the promising<br />

combiners.<br />

Postrainy preliminary hybrid trial (RPHT): Twenty-eight new postrainy season adapted hybrids were<br />

evaluated in a three replicated RCBD during the 2009 postrainy season along with the checks, M 35-1 and SPV<br />

1411. Compared to the best check SPV 1411 (4.1 t ha -1 ), six hybrids- ICSA 84 × SPV 1411 (5.9 t ha -1 ), ICSA<br />

88001 × M 35-1-19 (5.8 t ha -1 ), ICSA 675 × ICSV 700 (5.8 t ha -1 ), ICSA 502 × SPV 422 (5.6 t ha -1 ), ICSA 38<br />

× SPV 422 (5.4 t ha -1 ) and ICSA 88001 × IS 33844-5 (5.3 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior by 29 to 44%<br />

[trial mean: 3.2 t ha -1 , lsd (5%): 1.0]. The grain size (g 100 -1 grains) in the hybrids ranged from 3.2 to 4.0 (SPV<br />

1411: 3.5, M 35-1: 2.9), grain lustre score ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 (SPV 1411: 2.0, M 35-1: 2.7). They flowered<br />

in 69 to 75 days (SPV 1411: 75 days, M 35-1: 74 days) and the plant height ranged from 2.3 to 2.7 m (SPV<br />

1411: 2.3 m, M 35-1: 2.1 m) (HOPE Project Activity 2.4.6). The above parents of the six selected hybrids are<br />

the promising combiners.<br />

Belum VS Reddy<br />

Activity 5A.7.1: Developing dual-purpose foliar disease resistant forage/sweet sorghum hybrid parents.<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.1.1: Five new dual-purpose foliar disease resistant forage/sweet sorghum hybrid parents<br />

developed (PSR/BVSR, 2011)<br />

It is important to have resistance to foliar diseases in sweet sorghum genotypes to sustain the sugar yield and<br />

thereby extend the feedstock supplies to the distilleries. Hence, developing disease tolerant productive cultivars<br />

holds key to the success of ethanol/dairy industry.<br />

There are a series of trials that were conducted during the reporting period and are listed below.<br />

1. Screening of sweet sorghum B-lines for anthracnose resistance: A total of 95 sweet sorghum advanced<br />

B-lines were evaluated for anthracnose disease resistance reaction during the rainy season, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Anthracnose disease severity was recorded on a 1−9 scale (1=0 to


6. Sweet sorghum preliminary varietal trial (SSPVT-1): A total of 28 varieties selected from the sweet<br />

sorghum advanced progenies trial during the year of 2008 postrainy season, were evaluated in SSPVT<br />

during the 2009 postrainy season along with four checks, viz, CSH 22SS, SSV 84, JK Recova and Urja.<br />

The trial was conducted in RCBD with three replications. For sugar yield, seven varieties SP 08 16427<br />

(2.68 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16440 (2.5 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16447-2 (2.48 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16421-2 (2.4 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16447-<br />

1 (1.9 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16441 (1.76 t ha -1 ), SP 08 16439-1 (1.7 t ha -1 ) were numerically superior to the best<br />

performing check (SSV 84:1.39 t ha -1 ). Among the varieties, days to 50% flowering ranged from 59 to 78<br />

days (SSV 84: 63 days).The Brix % ranged from 8.7 to 17.8 % (SSV 84: 10.8 %), the stalk yield ranged<br />

from 21.7 to 42.9 t ha -1 (SSV 84: 29.49 t ha -1 ), and the grain yield ranged from 1.12 t ha -1 to 5.30 t ha -1<br />

(SSV 84: 3.07 t ha -1 ).<br />

7. Sweet sorghum preliminary varietal trial (SSPVT-2): A total of 160 varieties selected from sweet<br />

sorghum advanced progenies trial in postrainy 2009 were evaluated during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong> in RCBD<br />

with 3 replications along with five checks viz,CSH 22SS, Urja, SSV 84, JK Recova and RSSV 9 as checks.<br />

The sugar yield ranged from 0.2 to 1.9 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS and Urja: 1.0 t ha -1 ). A total of 96 entries had<br />

significantly superior sugar yield compared to the best performed check CSH 22SS (1.0 t ha -1 ). The highest<br />

sugar yield was recorded by line Ch-11 × SPV 422)-6-1-1-4 (1.9 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged<br />

from 60 to 94 days (CSH 22SS and JK Recova: 73 days) and the genotype Ch-1 × (DSV 4 × SSV 84)-1-2-<br />

1-1)-2-1-4-4 was the earliest to flower (60 days).Among the evaluated lines, Brix% ranged from 13.7 to<br />

19.0% (Urja:16.8%).<br />

8. Sweet sorghum preliminary hybrid nursery (SSPHN-1): A total of 540 sweet sorghum hybrids were<br />

evaluated during the 2009 postrainy season along with four checks viz, CSH 22SS, ICSA 38 × ICSV 700,<br />

SSV 84 and ICSV 93046 in augmented block design. The sugar yield ranged from 0.08 t ha -1 to 2.32 t ha -1<br />

(ICSV 93046: 1.3 t ha -1 ). Among all the hybrids, the days to 50% flowering ranged from 57 to 85 days<br />

(SSV 84: 60 days). Stalk yield ranged from 2.6 to 22.0 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 6.4 t ha -1 ) and the Brix% ranged<br />

from 7.0 to 19.3 % (ICSV 93046:18%), while grain yield ranged from 0.2 t ha -1 to 8.6 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 7.8 t ha -1 ).<br />

9. Sweet sorghum preliminary hybrid trial (SSPHT-1): A total of 17 sweet sorghum preliminary hybrids<br />

were selected previously, were evaluated during the 2009 postrainy season along with one check CSH<br />

22SS in RCBD with three replications. The sugar yield ranged from 0.37 t ha -1 to 1.54 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS:<br />

0.79 t ha -1 ). The hybrids, ICSA 258 × SSV 84 (1.54 t ha -1 ), ICSA 321 × GD 65025 (1.29 t ha -1 ), ICSA 309<br />

× NTJ 2 (1.27 t ha -1 ), ICSA 702 × RSSV 9 (1.05 t ha -1 ), ICSA 480 × GD 65085 (0.98 t ha -1 ), ICSA 669 ×<br />

ICSV 96143 (0.94 t ha -1 ), ICSA 374 × GD 65004 (0.92 t ha -1 ), SP 97032A × RSSV9 (0.86 t ha -1 ), SP<br />

97038A × SPV422 (0.81 t ha -1 ) were superior to the best performing check CSH 2SS (0.79 t ha -1 ). Among<br />

the genotypes, days to 50% flowering ranged from 58 days to 69 days (CSH 22 SS 64 days. Among the<br />

genotypes, Brix % ranged from 11.6% to 16.5 % (CSH 22SS: 12.1 %) and the grain yield ranged from 0.1 t<br />

ha -1 to 6.9 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 5.6 t ha -1 ).<br />

10. Sweet sorghum preliminary hybrid trial (SSPHT-2): A total of 48 sweet sorghum hybrids obtained<br />

2009 postrainy season, were evaluated as PHT-1 in rainy season, <strong>2010</strong> in RCBD with 3 replications along<br />

with 2 checks viz, CSH 22SS and JK Recova. The hybrids had a wide range of variation for sugar yield (0.2<br />

to 2.0 t ha -1 ). Four hybrids, i.e., ICSA 25002 × ICSV 93046 (2.0 t ha -1 ), SP 97032A × RSSV 9 (1.9 t ha -1 ),<br />

ICSA SP 97030 × SPV 422 (1.9 t ha -1 ) and SP 97030 A × E 36-1 (1.9 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior to<br />

the best check CSH 22SS (1.8 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged from 62 to 81 days (CSH 22SS:<br />

66 days). The hybrid ICSA SP 97038 x SPV 422 was the earliest to flower (62 days). Among the hybrids<br />

evaluated, Brix% ranged from 10.1% to 17.0% (CSH 22SS: 17%).<br />

11. Sweet sorghum preliminary hybrid trial (SSPHT-3): A total of 184 sweet sorghum hybrids obtained 2009 postrainy season,<br />

were evaluated as PHT-2 in rainy season <strong>2010</strong> in RCBD with 3 replications along with 2 checks CSH 22SS and JK Recova. In<br />

these hybrids sugar yield ranged from 0.3 t ha -1 to 2.5 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 2.0 t ha -1 ). Six hybrids, i.e., ICSA 474 × Ch 7 (2.5 t ha -1 );<br />

ICSA 319 × Ch 1 (2.4 t ha -1 ); ICSA 97046 × Ch 1 (2.2 t ha -1 ), ICSA 97034 × Ch 1 (2.0 t ha -1 ), ICSA 401 × Ch 7 (2.0 t ha -1 ) and<br />

ICSA 73 × Ch 7 (2.0 t ha -1 ) had significantly higher sugar yield compared to the best performing check CSH 22SS (2.0 t ha -1 ).<br />

The days to 50% flowering ranged between 58 and 82 days (JK Recova: 65 days). The hybrids ICSA 371 x Ch 7 and ICSA 514<br />

× Ch 11(58 days) flowered earliest.<br />

12. Sweet sorghum preliminary hybrid trial (SSPHT-4): A total of 120 sweet sorghum hybrids produced<br />

using non-Milo cytoplasmic male sterile lines (A2, A3 and A4)were evaluated in RCBD in 3 replications in<br />

during the rainy season, <strong>2010</strong> along with 2 checks CSH 22SS and JK Recova. In the hybrids sugar yield<br />

ranged from 0.4 to 1.5 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 1.2 t ha -1 ). Four hybrids i.e., ICSA 749 × SSV 84 (1.5 t ha-1);<br />

ICSA 716 × RSSV 9 (1.3 t ha -1 ), ICSA 731 × SP 4484-2 (1.2 t ha -1 ) and ICSA 731 × SP 4511-2 (1.2 t ha -1 )<br />

had significantly higher sugar yield compared to the best performing check CSH 22SS (1.2 t ha -1 ). The days<br />

to 50% flowering ranged from 68 to 121 days (JK Recova: 86 days). Plant height varied from 1.6 to 3.2 m<br />

(JK Recova: 3.1 m), while the Brix% ranged from 10.3 to 16.0% (JK Recova: 14.0%).<br />

214


13. Non-milo cytoplasmic sweet sorghum hybrid trial: A trial was constituted in rainy season <strong>2010</strong> using<br />

advanced non-milo cytoplasmic hybrids in RCBD design in 2 replications with 17 test hybrids the data was<br />

collected in 2 stages (dough stage and maturity stage). The self fertile standard checks CSH 22SS and Urja<br />

were used. In these hybrids, the sugar yield at maturity ranged from 0.5 to 2.8 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 2.0 t ha -1 ).<br />

ICSA 502 × ICSV 93046 recorded the highest sugar yield 2.8 t ha -1 , while the sugar yield at dough stage<br />

ranged from 0.1 to 2.9 t ha -1 (CSH 22SS: 2.9 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged from 69 to 78 days<br />

(Urja: 72 days) and Brix% at maturity ranged from 15.5 to 20.0 % (Urja: 20.0%).<br />

14. Sweet sorghum sterile hybrid trial (SSSHT): A total of 13 sweet sorghum sterile hybrids were evaluated<br />

during the 2009 postrainy season along with two checks viz, SSV 84 and CSH 22SS. Six hybrids ICSA 749<br />

× SPV 1411 (1.8 t ha- 1 ), ICSA 749 × ICSV 93046 (1.5 t ha -1 ), ICSA 95 × AKSV 13 (1.4 t ha -1 ), ICSA 38 ×<br />

ICSV 93046 (1.4 t ha -1 ), ICSA 502 × ICSV 93046 and ICSA 731 × ICSV 93046 (1.2 t ha -1 ) were superior<br />

to the best performing check (CSH 22SS: 1.1 t ha -1 ). The days to 50 % flowering ranged between 61 and 79<br />

days (CSH 22 SS: 64 days) and the plant height ranged from 1.7 m to 2.9 m (CSH 22SS: 2.5m).<br />

15. Evaluation of sorghum B-lines for leaf blight resistance: A total of 119 advanced B-lines were evaluated<br />

for leaf blight disease resistance reaction during the rainy season, <strong>2010</strong>. Leaf blight disease severity was<br />

recorded on a 1-9 scale (1=0 to


4. Sweet sorghum multi-location trials for postrainy season adaptation : A multilocation sweet sorghum<br />

hybrid trial (MSSHT) consisting of 8 hybrids (ICSA 38 × ICSV 700, ICSA 675 × ICSV 700, ICSA 702 ×<br />

SSV 74, ICSA 724 × SSV 74, ICSA 675 × SSV 74, PAC 52093, JK Recova and CSH 22SS), a multilocation<br />

sweet sorghum varietal trial (MSSVT) consisting of 7 varieties (SPV 422, NTJ 2, SP 4487-3, SP 4511-3,<br />

Urja, PA 27 and SSV 84) were evaluated in a three-replicated RCBD design at 3 stages (flowering, dough<br />

and maturity) in three locations (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru, , ANGRAU-Nandyal and TCL-Nanded) during the<br />

2009 postrainy season. In MSSHT for postrainy season adaptation, the pooled ANOVA revealed significant<br />

differences among locations for all traits, and significant genotype x location interaction for stalk yield in the<br />

experiment conducted during the postrainy season, 2009. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, the stalk yield decreased<br />

from flowering (28.64 t ha -1 ) to maturity (20.36 t ha -1 ), juice yield decreased from flowering (11.29 t ha -1 ) to<br />

maturity (5.96 t ha -1 ), Brix% increased from flowering (8.0 %) to maturity (17.6 %). But the sugar yield (t<br />

ha -1 ) [(Sugar yield = 0.75(Juice yield x Brix %/100)] was highest at flowering stage (0.96 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

dough stage (0.86 t ha -1 ). The hybrid ICSA 675 × SSV 74 recorded the highest sugar yield at all the three<br />

stages. In MSSVT, the pooled ANOVA revealed significant differences among locations and genotypes for<br />

all the above traits and also revealed significant genotype × location interaction effect for stalk yield and<br />

grain yields in the experiment conducted during the postrainy season 2009. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>–Patancheru, the<br />

stalk yield decreased from flowering (28.64 t ha -1 ) to maturity (26.39 t ha -1 ), juice yield decreased from<br />

flowering (12.17 t ha -1 ) to maturity (10.50 t ha -1 ), and the Brix % increased from flowering (8.7 %) to maturity<br />

(15.1 %). The sugar yield was highest at flowering (1.07 t ha -1 ) followed by dough stage (0.87 t ha -1 ).<br />

5. Sweet sorghum multi-location trials for rainy season adaptation: A multi location sweet sorghum hybrid<br />

trial (MSSHT) consisting of 12 hybrids (ICSA 38 × ICSV 700, ICSA 675 × ICSV 700, ICSA 702 × SSV 74,<br />

ICSA 724 × SSV 74, ICSA 731 × ICSV 93046, ICSA 474 × SSV 74, ICSA 675 × SSV 74, PAC 52093, JK<br />

Recova, JKSSH 02, JKSSH 03 and CSH 22SS), a multilocation sweet sorghum varietal trial (MSSVT)<br />

consisting of 12 varieties (SPV 422, NTJ 2, SP 4487-3, SP4495, SP 4484-2, SP 4511-3, Urja, PA 27, RSSV<br />

106, RSSV 138, RSSV 167, RSSV 9 and SSV 84) were evaluated in a three-replicated RCBD design at three<br />

stages (flowering, dough and maturity) in four locations (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru, Praj industries-Pune,<br />

MPKV-Rahuri and TCL-Nanded) during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. In MSSHT for rainy season adaptation, the<br />

pooled ANOVA revealed significant differences among hybrids and locations for all the traits (stalk yield,<br />

juice yield, Brix%, bagasse yield, sugar yield and grain yield) in the experiment conducted during the rainy<br />

season, <strong>2010</strong>. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, the sugar yield was highest at dough stage (2.67 t ha -1 ) followed by<br />

maturity (2.32 t ha -1 ). The hybrid ICSA 675 × SSV 74 was the highest sugar yielding hybrid at maturity. The<br />

stalk yield gradually declined from flowering (72.31 t ha -1 ) to dough (67.0 t ha -1 ) and maturity (58.4 t ha -1 ),<br />

while the Brix% sharply increased from flowering (7.5%) to dough (12.4%) and maturity (14.3 %). In<br />

MSSVT, the pooled ANOVA revealed significant differences among varieties and locations for all other<br />

traits (stalk yield, Brix%, sugar yield and grain yield) during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>. The days to 50%<br />

flowering in the varieties ranged from 74 to 97 days (Urja: 80 days) and SP 4484-2 was the earliest to flower<br />

(75 days). The sugar yield was highest at dough stage (2.07 t ha -1 ) followed by maturity stage (1.7 t ha -1 ).<br />

PA-27 recorded consistently high sugar yield in all the three stages.<br />

6. Evaluation of four sweet stalk hybrids, two sweet stalk varieties along with control hybrid CSH 22SS each in<br />

farmers’ fields in the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season at Ibrahimbad cluster in Medak district, A.P, India. Evaluated four<br />

sweet stalk hybrids and two sweet stalk varieties along with control hybrid CSH 22 each in 3 farmers’ fields<br />

in the rainy season. Data were recorded on the agronomic traits and sweet stalk traits. The pathologists<br />

surveyed the experimental fields and recorded the foliar disease data. No foliar diseases appeared during the<br />

crop growth but severe grain mold incidence was observed at the time of harvesting, owing to heavy rains.<br />

Data analysis is under progress.<br />

7. Facilitating cultivation of sweet sorghum in large area (>50 acres) in farmers fields and enhancing the onfarm<br />

productivity. The sweet sorghum hybrid CSH 22SS was cultivated in more than 40 ha in Ibrahimbad<br />

village in Medak District. The use of treated seed supplied by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and following improved crop<br />

production practices helped the farmers to achieve on an average of 25 t ha -1 stalk yield and 1.0 t ha -1 grain<br />

yield during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

Elite sweet sorghum cultivars were evaluated under on-farm conditions for identification of promising<br />

cultivars for immediate commercialization. Use of improved seed along with adaptation of recommended<br />

agronomic practices results in increased stalk and grain yields under on-farm conditions. MLTs help identify<br />

stable cultivars like ICSA 675 X ICSV 700, ICSA 675 × SSV 74 and ICSA474 x SSV74 for rainy season<br />

adaptation and PA-27 and ICSA 675 × SSV 74 for postrainy season adaptation.<br />

P Srinivasa Rao, Belum VS Reddy,<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Ch Ravinder Reddy<br />

216


Milestone: 5A.7.1.2: Six new high-yielding sweet sorghum restorers identified (PSR/BVSR/HDU, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Sweet sorghum hybrids are found to be promising for commercialization owing to the heterosis for sugar yield<br />

and allied traits. Hence, it is essential to develop high Brix% containing restorer lines for developing high sugar<br />

yielding hybrids.<br />

The trials were conducted for postrainy and rainy season adaptation as given below.<br />

Postrainy season adaptation:<br />

1. Sweet sorghum advanced varietal and restorer lines trial (SSAVRT): A total of 40 varieties and restorer<br />

lines selected from the sweet sorghum preliminary varietal and restorer lines trial during the 2008 postrainy<br />

season, were evaluated as sweet sorghum advanced varietal and restorer lines trial in 2009 postrainy season<br />

along with the four checks viz, Urja, SSV 84, CSH 22SS and JK Recova. The trial was conducted in RCBD with<br />

three replications. Thirty lines were superior to the best performing check Urja (1.57 t ha -1 ) for sugar yield. The<br />

sugar yield ranged from 0.88 t ha -1 to 2.73 t ha -1 (Urja: 1.57 t ha -1 ), days to 50% flowering from 59 to 77 days<br />

(Urja: 77 days) and Brix% from 7.0 to 14.0% (Urja: 11.5%).<br />

2. Sweet sorghum elite varietal and restorer’s trial (SSEVRT): A trial consisting of 30 elite sweet sorghum<br />

varieties and restorers selected previously was evaluated during the rainy season, <strong>2010</strong> in RCBD with 3<br />

replications along with 2 checks Urja and RSSV 9. In SSEVRT, sugar yield ranged from 1.2 to 2.8 t ha -1 (Urja:<br />

2.2 t ha -1 ). Ten entries had significantly higher sugar yield over the best performing check Urja (2.2 t ha -1 ). The<br />

days to 50% flowering ranged from 64 to 88 days (Urja: 68 days). Plant height ranged from 2.8 to 3.5 m (RSSV<br />

9: 3.3 m), grain yield in the genotypes from 0.3 to 1.0 t ha -1 (RSSV 9: 0.8 t ha -1 ) and Brix% from 11.9 to 17.9%<br />

(Urja: 17.9%). The top five high sugar-yielding entries were SP 08 2035-2, (2.8 t ha -1 ); SP 08 2044-3 (2.6 t ha -1 );<br />

SP 08 2017-3 (2.6 t ha -1 ); SP 08 1045-1 (2.6 t ha -1 ) and SP 08 2002-2 (2.6 t ha -1 ).<br />

Rainy season adaptation:<br />

1. Sweet sorghum advanced varietal and restorer lines trial (SSAVRT): A total of 18 advanced sweet sorghum varieties and restorers<br />

lines selected from sweet sorghum preliminary varietal trial in 2009 rainy season, were evaluated during the rainy season, <strong>2010</strong> along with<br />

two checks, i.e., Urja and RSSV 9 in RCBD with 3 replications. In SSAVRT, sugar yield ranged from 0.4 to 1.4 t ha -1 (RSSV 9: 0.8 t ha -1 ).<br />

Ten lines had significantly superior sugar yield compared to the best check RSSV 9 (0.8 t ha -1 ). There was a wide range of variation for days<br />

to 50% flowering (57-101 days) Ch 13 with 57 days to flower was the earliest (Urja: 69 days). Plant height ranged from 3.4 to 2.2 m (Urja:<br />

3.2 m) while the Brix% at maturity ranged from 11.1 to 18.3% (Urja: 17.5%).<br />

P Srinivasa Rao and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Output target 5A. 8: Stay-green QTLs associated with improved fodder quality introgressed into elite<br />

sorghum hybrid parents and their potential utility assessed (<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Activity 5A. 8.1: Mapping and introgression of stay-green QTL into elite parental lines, and assessment of<br />

their effects on hybrid performance<br />

Milestone 5B.8.1.1: Assessment of near-isogenic BC 3 F 3 and BC 4 F 3 stay-green QTL introgression lines<br />

completed in R16 and ISIAP Dorado backgrounds (CTH/SPD/VV/FRB, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Staygreen has, so far, been the best characterized trait conferring drought adaptation in sorghum. However, the<br />

mechanisms underlying the expression of staygreen remain quite unclear. Among the different hypotheses,<br />

differences in rooting, or in the pattern of water use, could explain the expression of staygreen during the postflowering<br />

terminal drought stress. Alternatively, differences in water use efficiency in staygreen lines could<br />

explain a slower water use and therefore would leave water available for the late stages of plant growth,<br />

allowing staygreen phenotypic expression.<br />

Materials were tested in a lysimetric system (2.0 m long and 25 cm diameter tubes filled with alfisol) under<br />

terminal water stress and fully irrigated conditions (see detailed description in http://www.icrisat.org/bt-rootresearch.htm.<br />

Water stress was imposed by providing a last irrigation at 5 weeks after sowing (+2L at 74 days<br />

after sowing) and compared to a fully irrigated control. Twenty nine introgression lines (IL) developed with<br />

Stg1, Stg2, Stg3, Stg4, StgA, and StgB QTL in S35 background, and sixteen IL developed with Stg1, Stg3, Stg4,<br />

and StgB QTL in R16 background were tested.<br />

Differences in tillering and leaf area at anthesis, transpiration efficiency (TE), water extraction, harvest index<br />

(HI) and yield under both terminal drought and fully irrigated conditions were assessed Stg B increased<br />

217


anspiration efficiency in the R16 background, whereas there was no effect in the S35 background. Stg1<br />

increased water extraction in the S35 background, whereas there was no effect in the R16 background. Stg1<br />

modified the proportion of water extracted before and after anthesis in both backgrounds, while StgB did so in<br />

S35 only. While tillering and leaf area at anthesis were decreased by Stg1, Stg2, and Stg3 in the S35 background,<br />

there was no such effect in R16. By contrast, yield data showed higher tiller grain yield in Stg1, Stg2, and Stg3<br />

ILs. Stay-green IL in the R16 background also had higher tiller yield than R16, except Stg3 IL, but less so than<br />

in S35. While yield differences were mostly explained by harvest index (HI), the substantial yield variation<br />

unexplained by HI was closely related to TE in the S35 background (R 2 = 0.29), and more so in the R16<br />

background (R 2 = 0.50), and closely related to total water extracted in S35 background (R 2 = 0.41), but not in<br />

the R16 background.<br />

Figure 7. Relationship between seed yield under terminal drought stress (DS) and the harvest index (HI)<br />

(a), relationship between the residual yield variations unexplained by HI (Res Yield not expl. HI) and<br />

transpiration efficiency (TE) (b), and relationship between the residual yield variations unexplained by<br />

HI and the total water extracted from the soil profile (c) in S35 (closed symbols) and R16 (open symbols)<br />

background. Data are the mean of 3 replicated lysimeter-grown plants per genotype<br />

These results indicate the potential of several stay-green QTL to affect traits related to plant water use and<br />

capture. It also shows very clearly that these effects depend more on the interaction between genetic background<br />

and QTL rather than on specific QTL.<br />

Output target 5A.9: Commercialization of sorghum grains and impact of improved germplasm enhanced.<br />

Milestone 5A.9.1.1.1: Hybrid parents (>50) and other breeding materials (>100) supplied to NARS and their<br />

impact assessed (BVSR/sorghum team—annual)<br />

Apart from developing improved hybrid parents, transferring them to the private sector seed companies and to<br />

the scientists in public sector organizations is of paramount importance to have the products reach the farmers<br />

in various countries. Towards this, we expose the materials available through field days. Also, partnering with<br />

national programs in project implementation leads to enhanced skills and impacts.<br />

Field days, seed supplies on requests and partnership trials are the major methods employed.<br />

A. Scientists field days<br />

1. Sorghum scientists field day for postrainy season was organized at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru on 18 January<br />

<strong>2010</strong> for the first time to show the postrainy adapted material to the participating scientists. A total of 33<br />

scientists from public and private sectors (13 public sector, 8 private sector and 12 from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>) participated<br />

in the program. Main focus was on research for postrainy season adaptation. Main suggestions were: 1.<br />

diversifying the breeding material with germplasm lines from Ethiopia and Yemen, and Muskwari sorghums. 2.<br />

218


postrainy season adapted dual-purpose sorghum material should be developed. 3. Postrainy season adapted<br />

sweet sorghum material should be developed.<br />

2. Sorghum scientists field day for rainy season was organized at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru on 6 and 7 October<br />

<strong>2010</strong> to showcase the depth and variability in the sorghum material bred for various traits with rainy season<br />

adaptation. Thirty scientists from the public sector, 11 from the private sector and 3 international training<br />

participants joined the program. Main focus was on research for rainy season adaptation.<br />

B. Seed supplies<br />

A total of 3275 seed samples of hybrid seed parents/breeding lines were sent to 21 countries. India received<br />

2375 samples, followed by Nigeria (160 samples). Of the 2375 samples supplied in India, 888 samples were<br />

sent to public sector scientists, 1380 samples to private sector scientists and the remaining 107 samples to<br />

farmers and NGOs. Breeder seed of ICSA38 (6 kg), SSV 84 (2 kg), ICSV 93046 (12 kg) and ICSV 25274 (12<br />

kg) was supplied for further multiplication by NARS partners. Nucleus seed of ICSV 745 (2 kg); CSV 13 (3 kg)<br />

and MR 750 (2 kg) was supplied to NARS. Seed in bulk quantities (218 kg) of 12 high yielding/released<br />

cultivars each 2 to 30 kg was supplied to 61 farmers. A total of 438 kg (12 cultivars - 5 to 151 kg each)<br />

sorghum seed was supplied for watershed and on farm experiments.<br />

During the field days in 2009 postrainy season, 548 lines were selected by two public sector and five private<br />

sector scientists and in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 1189 samples were selected by seven public sector and seven private<br />

sector scientists.<br />

Fourteen sets of sweet sorghum trials consisting of 302 entries were sent to Thailand (one set), Philippines (2<br />

sets), and India (11 sets).<br />

C. Partnership trials and nurseries<br />

Trials and nurseries: Fourteen sets of sweet stalk trials consisting of 423 entries (each nursery ranging from 10<br />

-90) were sent for evaluation in India, Philippines, Israel, Mexico, Mozambique and Mali. Seed of sweet<br />

sorghum varieties (2) and hybrids (2) along with parental lines was multiplied and sent to Directorate of<br />

Sorghum Research (DSR), Hyderabad, India, for testing at the All India Coordinated Sorghum Improvement<br />

Project (AICSIP) locations in the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season.<br />

Biofuel research collaboration: Under the IFAD-funded Biofuels project an on-farm breeding trial (discussed<br />

under Milestone 5A.7.1.1) and multilocation trials of hybrids, varieties and maintainer lines (discussed under<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.2) was conducted. A trial on ratoonability of sweet sorghum genotypes is being conducted in<br />

collaboration with Advanta Seeds Pvt Ltd to improve the harvesting window of raw material supply to<br />

distilleries. Nine promising sweet sorghum and grain sorghum genotypes were evaluated in a ratoonability trial<br />

during the 2009 rainy season. In the main crop, two sweet sorghum hybrids ICSA 731 × ICSV 93046 (1.1 t ha -1 )<br />

and CSH 22SS (1.0 t ha -1 ) and a sweet sorghum variety ICSV 93046 (1.0 t ha -1 ) were significantly superior<br />

compared to the check (SSV 84).<br />

Tropical sugar beet trial: A trial was conducted to evaluate the performance of four sugar beet entries (604,<br />

629, 824 and Green as checks), received from Syngenta India Ltd., Pune, India, during the postrainy season,<br />

2009 in RCBD with three replications in two environments (alfisols and vertisols). In alfisols, the sugar beet<br />

yield ranged from 21.7 t ha -1 to 26.0 t ha -1 (Green: 22.91 t ha -1 ). The highest beet yield was recorded by 809<br />

(26.0 t ha -1 ) and the Brix% ranged from 21.6% to 23.6% (Green: 23.6 %). In vertisols, the sugar beet yield<br />

ranged from 32.9 t ha -1 to 41.6 t ha -1 (Green: 33.0 t ha -1 ) and the Brix% ranged from 20.7 to 22.9% (Green:<br />

22.9 %). The mean sugar beet yields in vertisols (36.1 t ha -1 ) was significantly higher compared to that in the<br />

alfisols (24.0 t ha -1 ). This is probably due to high moisture holding capacity of black cotton soils (vertisols).<br />

D. Impacts<br />

1. Case study of JKSH 22:<br />

The initial survey for the Case Study on JKSH 22 (Sorghum Hybrid; parent material from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>) has been<br />

conducted for traders and farmers group in Maharashtra during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

• Farmers Group<br />

Seventeen farmers were interviewed. Ninety four percent claimed that JKSH 22 has good yield performance.<br />

Specific qualities shown by JKSH 22 are: non-lodging (71%), drought resistance (29%), good fodder<br />

quality (12%) and short duration (12%). Income earned by growing JKSH22 has been beneficial for an<br />

array of household activities such as family function (i.e. marriage) – 100%, agriculture-related – 94%,<br />

children’s education – 76%, house construction – 65%, and social/religious donations -12%.<br />

219


• Distributor, Dealers, and Retailers Group<br />

One major distributor and five dealers were interviewed. The sole distributor handles about 35 tonnes of<br />

JKSH 22 per season and has 250 dealers in his network. He claimed that JKSH 22 will continue it’s grip in<br />

the market for many more years because of its good quality. The five dealers, on the other hand, have at<br />

least 30-35 retailers per dealer. In some cases, dealers were also retailers. The range of farmers served by<br />

dealer was from 1,000- 4,000 with most having 2,000. Dealers and retailers alike claimed that JKSH 22 is<br />

high yielding which explains its persistence in the market.<br />

2. HOPE project:<br />

The improved postrainy season adapted sorghum varieties (Parbhani Moti, Phule Vasudha, Phule Chitra and<br />

Phule Yasodha) were grown in an area of 2760 ha by 6900 farmers. By adoption of improved postrainy<br />

season production technologies, the average grain yield increased by 54% and fodder yield by 30%.<br />

Belum VS Reddy, A Ashok Kumar, P Srinivasa Rao,<br />

Ch Ravinder Reddy and Rosana Mula<br />

Milestone 5A.9.1.2: Ten sorghum scientists trained biannually (BVSR/sorghum team—alternate year)<br />

Improving the capacity or the knowledge or skills of the national breeders in crop improvement is one of the<br />

components that contribute to enhanced impact on the farmer’s fields.<br />

Both on-hand practical training in the field on various crop improvement operations along with class room<br />

lectures on the theory were followed and the experienced scientists were roped into provide the needed<br />

interaction. Also reading materials were supplied.<br />

A. NARS Scientists<br />

Mr. Yousuf from Egypt was trained on sorghum hybrid production and improvement from 13 September to 12<br />

November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

A training program on “Sorghum hybrid parents and hybrids development and production” was conducted at<br />

IAR, Abu, Zaria, Nigeria, from 16-20 August <strong>2010</strong>. About 73 participants from six countries (Senegal, Niger,<br />

Mali, Nigeria, Ghana and Burkina Faso) participated in the training program which included 5 female<br />

participants. Most of the participants were seed production/ certification officers, sorghum breeders/scientists,<br />

and Associate Directors of seed production of the public sector or from private sector. The training program<br />

included 12 lectures, one group discussion on seed sales and marketing and updates on sorghum breeding<br />

approach and status in various WCA countries (by individual country breeders) and hands-on training in the<br />

maintenance of seed parents and varieties/restorers, breeding hybrid parental lines, hybrid production on small<br />

and large scales, selection criteria, and formation and setting of breeding objectives and programs.<br />

B. Farmers and partners in special projects<br />

IFAD Project:<br />

Training program title<br />

No. of<br />

programs<br />

1 On-farm : Improved crop production technologies 15 220<br />

2 Best bet practices 1 15<br />

3 On-station: Improved crop production technologies 2 50<br />

4 Multilocation trials 2 12<br />

Total 20 297<br />

S.No.<br />

No. of<br />

participants<br />

CFC Project:<br />

S.No.<br />

Training program title<br />

No. of<br />

No. of<br />

programs participants<br />

1 On-farm : Improved crop production technologies 47 456<br />

2 Best bet practices 3 85<br />

3 On-station: Improved crop production technologies 15 437<br />

4 Project activities awareness programs 3 216<br />

5 DCU operation and management program 2 36<br />

Total 70 1230<br />

220


NAIP Project:<br />

S.No.<br />

Training program title<br />

No. of<br />

programs<br />

No. of<br />

participants<br />

1 On-farm : Improved crop production technologies<br />

2 Field day :Best bet practices 1 45<br />

3 DCU operation and management 1 15<br />

4 Project activities awareness programs in new villages 6 114<br />

5 Soil health management; importance of micronutrients 2 56<br />

in crop productivity<br />

6 Demonstration of seed-cum fertilizer drill 3 43<br />

7 Demonstration of leaf stripper 1 12<br />

8 Projection of video film on sweet sorghum crop 2 67<br />

production and DCU syrup production practices<br />

9 Farm Implements for Mechanizing Small Farms 1 30<br />

Total 17 382<br />

HOPE project:<br />

Sr. No.<br />

Training program title<br />

No. of<br />

No. of<br />

programs participants<br />

1 Training on Improved crop production technologies of 30 600<br />

postrainy sorghum<br />

2 Training on Seed treatment and IPM 30 300<br />

3 Soil health management; importance of micronutrients 6 150<br />

in crop productivity (Soil sample collection)<br />

4 Field day :Best bet practices (INM, IPM & IDM) 6 3000<br />

5 Women farmers rally 2 200<br />

6 Demonstration of seed-cum fertilizer drill 6 180<br />

7 Training on good business practices 6 250<br />

8 Training on Sorghum Seed Production, Storage and 4 480<br />

marketing (farmers, KVK & SAU Staff)<br />

9 Training to female farmers on alternate uses of 2 50<br />

sorghum<br />

10 Training on Self seed collection of rabi Sorghum 30 1500<br />

Total 122 6110<br />

Belum VS Reddy, A Ashok Kumar,<br />

P Srinivasa Rao and Ch Ravinder Reddy<br />

II. Pearl millet<br />

Output target 5A.1: Genetically diverse, high-yielding and downy mildew (DM) resistant pearl millet<br />

parental lines of potential grain hybrids (at least 9 each of seed parents and restorer parents) developed<br />

annually during 2006-2011<br />

Activity 5A 1.1: Develop and characterize regionally adapted high-yielding and DM resistant hybrid parents<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.1: Diverse range of high-yielding and DM resistant seed parents and restorer parents<br />

developed (SKG/KNR/RPT/RS)<br />

Seed parents with high grain yield potential and downy mildew resistance are developed every year for use by<br />

the public and private sector. In <strong>2010</strong>, nine male sterile lines (A-lines) of diverse parentage and morphological<br />

traits (flowering, plant height, panicle length and 1000-grain weight) were developed. Of these, 2 A-lines were<br />

in A 1, 4 in A 4 , 2 in A 5 cytoplasmic background. One A- line was in both A 4 and A 5 cytoplasmic background. All<br />

these lines were highly resistant to at least two of the five diverse pathotypes of downy mildew (≤10% disease<br />

incidence) under high disease pressure in greenhouse inoculation test (> 95 % disease incidence in the<br />

susceptible check 7042S). ICMB 10444, 10555, 10888, 10999 were found resistant to all the five pathotypes;<br />

while ICMB 10222, 10666, 10777 were found resistant to any of the four pathotypes; ICMB 10111 to three<br />

pathotypes and ICMB 10333 was found resistant to two DM pathotypes. In addition, 367 B-lines (BC 1 to BC 10<br />

generation) were evaluated in different cytoplasmic backgrounds (110 A 1 , 172 A 4 and 265 A 5 cytoplasm) and<br />

221


358 lines were selected: 81 in A 1 cytoplasm, 127 in A 4 cytoplasm and 214 in A 5 cytoplasm for further evaluation<br />

and conversion into A-lines.<br />

An equally important program of restorer line development runs parallel to the seed parents program to develop<br />

diverse, DM resistant and high-yielding restorer lines. Nine restorer lines (R-lines) of diverse origin with<br />

desirable agronomic traits (flowering, plant height, panicle length and 1000- grain weight) and resistant to at<br />

least two of the five DM pathotypes were developed. ICMR 10444 and ICMR 10777 showed resistant to all five<br />

pathotypes, while other lines were resistant to 3-4 pathotypes. Five lines were restorers of the A 1 CMS system,<br />

while two lines were restorers of the A 4 CMS system and 2 were restorers on both A 1 and A 4 CMS system.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.2: Seed parents and restorer parents adapted to arid zone developed<br />

For arid zone, seed/restorer parent progenies are bred with traits like early maturity, high tillering, stay-green<br />

with high yield potential and DM resistance. In this direction, a nursery of 89 early-maturing progenies was<br />

evaluated in rainy season <strong>2010</strong>, of which 48 progenies were selected. Of these, 10 flowered in < 40 days<br />

(control 843B flowered in 36 days). In other nursery of early B-lines, 58 progenies were evaluated in rainy<br />

season <strong>2010</strong> of which 19 were selected, of which 14 flowered in < 45 days. Ninety one advanced progenies (S 5 -S 8 )<br />

derived from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-CAZRI-B–Composite (ICCZBC) were evaluated in 6 drought nurseries during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

summer season, of which 48 were selected, with 11 of these flowering in 14g. To generate long<br />

panicled progenies, 58 advanced seed parent progenies (F 8 -F 10 /S 8 ) were selected on the basis of panicle length<br />

and other agronomic traits from 90 progenies evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, of which, 3 progenies had<br />

panicle length of 41-45 cm; 9 had panicle length of 36-40 cm and 8 progenies had 31-35 cm panicle length<br />

(check ICMB 05888 recorded panicle length of 41cm). In other seed parent nursery of 20 advanced progenies<br />

222


evaluated during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 9 progenies were selected for long panicles based on visual and agronomic<br />

score. Two of the selected progenies flowered in 46-50 days; 2 progenies flowered in 51-55 days and 5<br />

progenies flowered in 56-60 days.<br />

In restorer breeding program 354 long-panicled progenies (F 4 -F 10 / S 9 -S 10 ) involving parental lines RCB-2,<br />

ICMS 7704, R1B 3135-18 and Zongo were evaluated in 7 nurseries, of which, 151 were selected based on long<br />

panicles and visual agronomic score. Seven of these selected progenies had panicle length of more than 50 cm<br />

and 25 progenies had panicle length of 41-50 cm. To develop white-seeded pearl millet cultivars, we evaluated<br />

43 white-seeded F 5 progenies during rainy season of <strong>2010</strong> and selected 19 progenies based on white seed color<br />

and agronomic score, of which 9 flowered in < 50 days. To expand this program further, we evaluated 11 newly<br />

developed F 2 s during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong> and selected 9 F 2 s for further advancement. To identify high<br />

biomass lines, based on 2009 summer and <strong>2010</strong> rainy season evaluation, 18 accessions (procured from Genetic<br />

Resources Unit) were identified based on their high dry biomass yield at 80 days after sowing.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai, HD Upadhyaya, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Milestone 5A.2.1.2: Genetically diverse trait-specific (eg. large seed, large panicle size, diverse maturity and<br />

height) advanced breeding lines developed and disseminated (2006, 2008, <strong>2010</strong>, and 2012) (KNR/SKG/RPT/RS)<br />

Keeping into consideration the trait specific requirements of different agro-regions, improved breeding lines are<br />

developed continuously in the hybrid breeding program. Besides grain yield potential, flowering time, DM<br />

resistance and overall agronomic performance are the prime criteria for selection and advancement of breeding<br />

material. Results of large-seeded and long-panicle trait-specific breeding lines have been reported under<br />

milestone 5A.2.1.1.<br />

Trait-Specific seed parent progenies: About 850 breeding lines were evaluated in different trait-specific<br />

nurseries in rainy season of <strong>2010</strong>. For early maturity a nursery of 89 early-maturing progenies was evaluated, of<br />

which 48 progenies were selected. Of these, 35 flowered in < 45 days, similar to the control (843B flowered in<br />

36 days). In another nursery of early B-lines, 58 progenies were evaluated of which 19 were selected, of them<br />

14 flowered in < 45 days. A nursery comprising of 81 thick-panicled progenies (F 5 ) was evaluated and selected<br />

29 superior lines. Of these, 11 progenies flowered in 46-55 days, while 18 flowered in 56-65 days (ICMB 01333<br />

flowered in 60 days). In another nursery, 120 thick-panicled F 3 progenies were evaluated, of which 48 progenies<br />

were selected that flowered in 41-55 days. For stay-green trait, 26 progenies were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

summer season in drought nursery, of which 5 progenies with stay-green trait were selected, of which 5<br />

flowered in 46-50 days (ICMB 89111 flowered in 43 days). In a nursery of promising stay-green breeding<br />

material, 114 progenies were evaluated, of which 42 progenies were selected based on overall agronomic score<br />

and stay-green trait. All these flowered in 41-50 days (ICMB 00999 flowered in 48 days). A nursery of 128 F 7<br />

bristled and dwarf progenies were evaluated, of which 52 progenies with good agronomic score and bristled<br />

panicle were selected. One hundred and ninety-nine advanced (F 8 ) d 2 dwarf progenies (45-80 cm) were<br />

evaluated and 50 progenies were selected based on agronomic score. To introduce compactness, twenty-two<br />

progenies with very compact panicle were selected from various nurseries evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy<br />

season, of which, 13 were found agronomically good.<br />

Trait-Specific restorer progenies: Seven thick-panicled progenies (S 6 /F 5 ) selected on the basis of multi-season<br />

data were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, of which 5 progenies were selected based on agronomic score<br />

and thick panicle. In search for superior donors for panicle compactness, 17 progenies (S 5 -S 9 / F 4 -F 5 ) were<br />

evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, of which 11 progenies were selected based on agronomic score and<br />

panicle compactness.<br />

In addition, 282 progenies were evaluated for adaptation–specific characteristics; 131 progenies (F 5 -F 7 ) in the A 5 cytoplasmic<br />

background and having A 5 restorer gene(s); 52 iniari type progenies (S 8 -S 8 ); 83 population derived progenies; 122 potential R-lines<br />

and 216 elite restorer lines were evaluated and selections made in rainy <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

To disseminate promising materials to national programs, Scientists Field Day was organized on 30th<br />

September-1st October, <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru where 16 participants from public sector and 19<br />

participants from Consortium Seed companies participated.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

223


Milestone 5A.2.1.3: An elite B-composite and an elite R-composite with resistance to multiple pathotypes of<br />

downy mildew populations developed (2009) (SKG/KNR/RPT/RS)<br />

Eleven potential restorers highly resistant (≤10% disease incidence under high disease pressure in the<br />

greenhouse) to five diverse pathotypes (Banaskantha, Barmer, Jamnagar, Jodhpur and Jalna) and four potential<br />

restorers highly resistant to any four of these five pathotypes had undergone two cycles of random mating in<br />

2008. Third and final random mating in this material was done in summer season of 2009, after which selected<br />

plants were bulked to finally develop Multiple Downy Mildew Resistant Restorer composite (MDMRRC). The<br />

MDMRRC was distributed to 5 NARS partners for utilization in rainy season of <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Nineteen lines with high levels of DM resistance had undergone two cycles of intermating in 2009 to constitute<br />

Multiple Downy Mildew Resistant B – composite (MDMRBC). This material had undergone third cycle of<br />

random mating in summer of <strong>2010</strong> and MDMRBC was constituted. One hundred and twenty nine half-sibs were<br />

selected and evaluated in rainy season <strong>2010</strong>, of which 50 were selected of which 4 S 1s flowered in < 45 days<br />

while rest of 46 S 1s flowered in 41-50 days. The seed of this composite is now available for distribution for<br />

testing in different agro-ecologies.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Output target 5A.3: Morphological and molecular diversity of more than 150 elite inbred lines of pearl<br />

millet assessed and the relationship between diversity and yield heterosis demonstrated (2009)<br />

Activity 5A 3.1: Evaluate parental lines, advanced breeding lines and their hybrids for grain yield, and<br />

morphological and molecular diversity<br />

Milestone 5A.3.1.1: Designated seed parents and restorer lines characterized for DUS traits and molecular<br />

diversity (2008) (SKG/KNR/RV)<br />

Designated seed parents were characterized and the information has been documented in “Morphological<br />

Characteristics of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred Pearl Millet Hybrid Seed Parents”, a 176 page book available on-line at<br />

(http://www.icrisat.org/what-we-do/publications/digital-publications/icrisat-publications-<strong>2010</strong>/morphological-<br />

Pearlmillet.pdf).<br />

Restorer lines have been characterized and document “Characterization of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred Pollinator Parents of<br />

Pearl Millet” has been drafted. Pollinator lines were photographed in rainy season <strong>2010</strong> for documenting this<br />

information in 2011.<br />

SK Gupta and KN Rai<br />

Milestone 5A.3.1.2: Selected hybrid parents and advanced breeding lines characterized for morphological and<br />

molecular diversity, and yield heterosis (2009), (KNR/SKG/RV)<br />

A trial designated as SET-I, consisting of 22 hybrids developed on the basis of molecular diversity between<br />

designated seed and restorer parents and previously evaluated in rainy season 2008 were evaluated along with<br />

their parental lines in summer season of <strong>2010</strong> in a RCBD with three replications, with hybrids and parental lines<br />

planted side-by-side as the blocks in each replication. Also, other trial designated as SET-II, consisting of 29<br />

hybrids generated on the basis of molecular diversity between promising seed and restorer parents and<br />

previously evaluated in rainy season 2009 wasre-evaluated in summer season <strong>2010</strong> on the same basis as<br />

mentioned for SET-I. Data for grain and stover yield and component traits were recorded for both the sets. The<br />

data are under analysis. The parental lines involved in generation of hybrids for both the sets have been<br />

genotyped using DART markers to provide molecular diversity–index based on a larger genomic data.<br />

SK Gupta and KN Rai<br />

Milestone 5A.3.1.3: Two medium-maturity heterotic gene pools based on molecular marker diversity<br />

constituted (2012) (SKG/KNR/SC/RV)<br />

The results from milestone 5A.3.1.2 will determine the approach for developing the heterotic gene-pools.<br />

SK Gupta and KN Rai<br />

224


Output target 5A.4: QTLs for downy mildew resistance in pearl millet identified, compared to those<br />

previously detected, and their effect on DM resistance assessed (2008)<br />

Activity 5A.4.1: Development of mapping populations and QTL mapping of DM resistance<br />

Milestone 5A.4.1.1: QTL mapping based on F 6 RILs and F 2:4 progenies from two crosses completed and results<br />

compared (CTH/SS/RPT/RS, 2008)<br />

Milestone 5A.4.1.2: Genetically diverse parents of mapping populations identified and crossed to generate F 6<br />

RILs (CTH/KNR/RPT/RS, 2007)<br />

Activity 5A.4.2: Map-directed conventional backcrossing and marker-assisted backcrossing of DM resistance<br />

QTLs into parental lines of hybrids<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.1: Ten major QTL imparting resistance against specific DM pathtypes identified<br />

(CTH/RPT/RS, 2007)<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.2: Near-isogenic lines containing different DM resistance genes (QTL) developed<br />

(RPT/RS/CTH, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.3: QTL with known effects against diverse pathotypes pyramided in 843B and other parental<br />

lines and their resistance levels determined (CTH/RPT/RS, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.4: Several different single-QTL introgression homozygotes available in genetic backgrounds<br />

of two elite seed parents (CTH/RPT/RS, 2007)<br />

Milestone 5A.4.2.5: Several different multiple-QTL introgression homozygotes available in genetic<br />

backgrounds of an elite restorer line and three diverse elite seed parents (CTH/TN/SS/RPT/RS, 2009)<br />

Output target 5A.5: Virulence changes in pearl millet DM pathogen populations determined (2009)<br />

Activity 5A.5.1: Conduct field and laboratory studies to monitor the nature of virulence change in DM<br />

pathogen populations<br />

Milestone 5A.5.1.1: Ten to fifteen DM isolates each from Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh<br />

characterized for pathogenicity and virulence (RPT/RS/KNR/RB, 2008)<br />

Isolates of Sclerospora graminicola, the pearl millet downy mildew (DM) pathogen, collected from highly<br />

susceptible pearl millet hybrids during on-farm surveys in different states of India are characterized for<br />

pathogenic variation to monitor virulence change in the pathogen population. Highly virulent isolates thus<br />

identified from different states are used for screening germplasm and breeding lines for identifying new sources<br />

of resistance and developing DM-resistant hybrid parental lines and hybrids.<br />

Virulence diversity was studied in S. graminicola populations (70 isolates) collected from four Indian states<br />

(Maharashtra- 13; Rajasthan- 22; Gujarat- 14; and Uttar Pradesh-21). Pathogenic variation was studied by their<br />

reaction on seven host differential lines (P 7-4, P310-17, 700651, 7042R, 852B, IP 18292 and IP 18293) in the<br />

greenhouse. For this, pot-grown seedlings of pearl millet lines were spray-inoculated at the coleoptile stage with<br />

sporangial suspensions of the test isolates. The inoculated seedlings were incubated at 20ºC and >90% RH for<br />

20 h, and then transferred to a greenhouse bench at 25 ºC under misting (leaf wetness) for disease development.<br />

Downy mildew incidence was recorded 14 days after inoculation as percent infected plants.<br />

Significant variation was observed for downy mildew incidence among the test isolates. Pathogen populations from Uttar Pradesh were<br />

found most aggressive with a mean 70% DM incidence by the isolates across seven differentials followed by Gujarat 47%, Rajasthan 37%<br />

and Maharashtra 26%. Pathogen isolates virulent on all the seven differentials were also maximum from Uttar Pradesh (62%) followed by<br />

Gujarat (50%) and Rajasthan (36) and minimum from Maharashtra (8%). Isolate Sg 507 from Uttar Pradesh was most virulent (96% mean<br />

DM); whereas, Sg 021 from Maharashtra and Sg 468 from Rajasthan were least virulent with 5% mean DM across differentials. Based on<br />

virulence diversity study, Sg 492 from Aligarh and Sg 510 from Badaun in Uttar Pradesh; Sg 445 from Banaskantha in Gujarat; Sg 457<br />

from Jaipur in Rajasthan; and Sg 534 from Ahmednagar in Maharashtra have been selected for greenhouse screening of pearl millet<br />

breeding lines for these specific regions.<br />

RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

225


Milestone 5A.5.1.2: Spatial and temporal virulence pattern of downy mildew pathogens assessed through<br />

virulence nursery and on-farm survey results (RPT/RS/KNR/RB/CTH, 2009)<br />

Pathogenic variability in Sclerospora graminicola remains a major research focus associated with downy<br />

mildew management in pearl millet through host plant resistance. As a result of evolution of host-specific<br />

virulence, resistant genotypes lose their effective resistance within a short period, leading to the development of<br />

new pathotypes in the pathogen populations. Therefore, pathogen populations in the major crop growing areas<br />

need to be periodically monitored and characterized to identify new pathotypes in the target area. Monitoring the<br />

virulence shift in the pathogen population, identifying new virulent pathotypes, screening breeding lines for<br />

resistance against the new virulent pathotypes, and strategically using and deploying resistance genes form the<br />

strategy of downy mildew management in pearl millet. Through the ICAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> partnership project,<br />

virulence in the pathogen population is monitored by conducting a collaborative Pearl Millet Downy Mildew<br />

Virulence Nursery (PMDMVN), conducting on-farm downy mildew survey, and pathogenic characterization of<br />

selected isolates using host differentials.<br />

The PMDMVN, consisting of 25-50 pearl millet lines and a local susceptible check was established at 11<br />

locations in India during the rainy seasons 2006-08. The nursery was conducted using sick plot and infector-row<br />

systems at all the locations. Data on disease incidence were recorded at 30-day and 60-day after emergence.<br />

Significant differences were found in downy mildew incidence in test lines at different locations, indicating<br />

variability in virulence of S. graminicola populations. Mean downy mildew incidence across entries and seasons<br />

was highest at Anand, indicating that population of S. graminicola at Anand was more virulent than those at<br />

other locations. The pathogen population at Jamnagar was least virulent. P 7-4, P 310-17, 700651, 852B, 834B,<br />

IP 18292, IP 18293, H 77/833-2 and 843B were common entries in the PMDMVN conducted during 2006-08<br />

and exhibited differential reaction to S. graminicola populations across locations confirming ‘spatial pathogenic<br />

variation’ in the pathogen. IP 18292, once considered as a stable source of resistance, succumbed to Anand and<br />

Durgapura pathotypes exhibiting temporal virulence change and evolution of new virulence in S. graminicola.<br />

Temporal pathogenic variation in the S. graminicola populations was studied by the reaction of old and new<br />

isolates collected from the same area using seven host differential lines (P 7-4, P310-17, 700651, 7042R, 852B,<br />

IP 18292 and IP 18293) in a greenhouse screen. Results of the DM screen showed that old isolate Sg 151,<br />

collected during 1997 from Durgapura had only 13% mean DM incidence across differentials, whereas the new<br />

isolate Sg 505 collected during 2008 recorded 79% mean incidence and infected all the 7 differentials. Similarly,<br />

old isolate Sg 334 from Haryana had 9% mean DM incidence, whereas the new isolate Sg 519 had 66% mean<br />

incidence. This is also true with the pathogen populations in Maharashtra. New isolate Sg 534 collected in 2009<br />

from Ahmednagar, Maharashtra is more virulent (35% mean DM incidence) than the old isolate Sg 021<br />

collected in 1993 (5% mean DM incidence) indicating temporal virulence change in the S. graminicola<br />

populations and evolution of more virulent pathotypes in pearl millet growing areas in India.<br />

RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Output target 5A.6: At least two improved populations and experimental hybrids of pearl millet with<br />

high forage yield potential developed (2009)<br />

Activity 5A 6.1: Develop and evaluate improved open-pollinated varieties and hybrids for their forage yield<br />

potential<br />

Milestone 5A.6.1.1: Additional germplasm sources with high biomass yield identified (KNR/RB/HDU/MB,<br />

2009)<br />

Although a few OPVs and experimental hybrids with high forage yield have been developed, search for new<br />

germplasm sources with high forage yield potential continued. We had evaluated 27 accessions during the 2009<br />

summer season, of which 21 gave 8.1-9.8 t ha -1 of dry fodder yield (four control OPVs had 8.0-9.2 t ha -1 forage<br />

yield) at 80-day harvest. Thus, in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, it was decided to repeat this trial. The rainy season trial<br />

mean (5.2 t ha -1 ) was much lower than the summer season trial mean ( 8.6 t ha -1 ). Yet, five accessions had 6.5-<br />

7.3 t ha -1 dry forage yield and included two of the highest-yielding accessions identified in 2009 summer season<br />

trial. Based on the performance across the two seasons, 10 accessions and the 4 control OPVs were sent to<br />

AICPMIP to constitute a forage trial that will be evaluated at 6 locations in 2011 summer season.<br />

226


Milestone 5A.6.1.2: Improved populations and experimental hybrids with high forage yield potential<br />

developed (KNR/RB/ HDU/MB, 2009)<br />

Milestone 5A 6.1.3: Diverse seed parents with high forage yield potential developed and characterized (2012)<br />

(SKG/KNRMB)<br />

Thirteen forage-type lines earlier identified as seed parent lines with high forage potential were initiated for<br />

backcrossing in A 5 CMS background in summer of <strong>2010</strong>. Eight of these were also backcrossed in A 4 CMS<br />

system. BC1’s were generated for these forage-type materials in rainy season of <strong>2010</strong>. In addition, 352 forage<br />

type seed parent progenies (F 4 ); 12 (S 6 -S 8 ) progenies; and 92 (S 3 -S 6 ) progenies were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

rainy season, of which 155 lines were selected. Of these, 27 progenies flowered in > 60 days while 98 flowered<br />

in 51-60 days (Check ICMB 03222 flowered in 52 days).<br />

Also, 29 seed parent progenies found promising for forage type traits were selected based on diverse parentage.<br />

Of these, 15 flowered in


evaluation of pearl millet forage trials at two locations in Jordan were given on-spot training. Input was<br />

provided for developing in-country/in-region seed production programs to accelerate the adoption of pearl millet<br />

populations primarily for forage production. Not much further progress could be made in popularizing pearl<br />

millet in Central Asia. However, the feedback from Uzbekistan shows increasing popularity of this crop due to<br />

the efforts of a government-funded pearl millet project in that country.<br />

KN Rai, CLL Gowda and Pearl Millet Team<br />

Milestone 5A 8.1.3: International Pearl Millet Training Course (2009) and Field Day (2006, 2008, <strong>2010</strong>, 2012)<br />

conducted (KNR/CLL/pearl millet team)<br />

Scientists Field Day was organized on 30 September-1 October, <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru where 16<br />

participants from public sector and 19 participants from Consortium Seed companies participated. Scientists<br />

Field Day was organized on 30 September-1 October, <strong>2010</strong> at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru where 16 participants from<br />

public sector and 19 participants from Consortium Seed companies participated. The participants selected 2555<br />

distinct breeding lines (1206 from public sector and 1349 from private sector). Of these selections, seed of 2300<br />

breeding lines (92%) was provided to participating institutions in <strong>2010</strong>. The seed of rest of about 250 breeding<br />

lines will be multiplied in summer season 2011 and shared with partners.<br />

KN Rai, CLL Gowda and Pearl millet Team<br />

Milestone 5A 8.1.4: Technical information and public awareness documents developed and disseminated<br />

(KNR/CLLG/pearl millet team, annual)<br />

Milestone 5A 8.1.5: Commercialization of pearl millet grains strengthened through researcher-farmer-industry<br />

alliances (KNR/CLLG/pearl millet team-annual)<br />

Output 5B: Enhanced molecular genetic and phenotyping platforms for drought and salinity screening<br />

and parental lines of hybrid sorghum, pearl millet and pigeonpea with improved tolerance to abiotic<br />

stresses, made available to partners biennially (from 2008) with associated knowledge and capacity<br />

building in SAT Asia.<br />

I. Pigeonpea<br />

Output Target 5A.1: About 15 high-yielding pigeonpea hybrids made available for cultivation in different<br />

environments (2006-2009).<br />

Activity 5A.1.1: Development of widely adapted high-yielding hybrids for different environments.<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.1: At least 100 new hybrid combinations evaluated to identify new fertility restorers/male<br />

sterility maintainers (KBS/KML, 2006-09).<br />

A total of 154 new hybrids were evaluated in station trials at Patancheru. Of these, 11 new hybrids exhibited<br />

male- sterility and such plants were used in further backcrossing. In 120 hybrids all the plants were fully fertile.<br />

Their pollen parents were selfed to get pure seed. The remaining 23 hybrids exhibited variability (50 –<br />

90%) for male- fertility.<br />

KB Saxena<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.2: At least five high yielding hybrids each in early and medium maturity duration identified for<br />

multi-location testing (KBS/KML, 2007).<br />

Short-duration hybrids: Based on the multi-location performance, eight short-duration hybrids were identified<br />

and evaluated in two replications at Patancheru. Of these, ICPH 2433 was found to be 41% superior to well<br />

known national check UPAS 120. ICPH 2433 also performed well in multi-location testing in the previous year<br />

and it recorded 31.6 % superiority over check in 33 locations. Hence, plans were made to promote this hybrid<br />

for on-farm trials.<br />

Evaluation of white-seeded pigeonpea hybrids: To meet the specific requirements of high-yield and white<br />

seed color hybrids for Gujarat state, 15 white-seeded hybrids were tested in two trials at Patancheru and Gujarat.<br />

At Patancheru, initial growth and vigor of these hybrids were good. The hybrids identified on the basis of highyield<br />

and disease resistance were ICPH 4329, ICPH 4182, and ICPH 4184. The highest (65%) superiority was<br />

228


ecorded by ICPH 4329 with no wilt and SM incidence in the disease nursery. ICPH 4171 had large seeds. The<br />

trial was vitiated due to heavy rains in Gujarat.<br />

KB Saxena<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.3: At least five pigeonpea hybrids identified for on-farm testing (KBS/KML, 2008).<br />

Based on multi-location data, besides ICPH 2671, the other disease resistant promising hybrids identified were<br />

ICPH 2740 and ICPH 3762. The hybrid ICPH 2740 was evaluated in 33 locations during 2005-2008 (Table 2)<br />

and overall it recorded 37.8% superiority over control Asha. This hybrid flowered in 116 - 129 days and<br />

matured in 172 - 186 days with 100-seed mass of 10.8 g. The other hybrid ICPH 3762 was evaluated at eight<br />

locations and it recorded 11.9% superiority (Table 3) over the control. This hybrid flowered in 115 - 126 days<br />

and matured in 171 - 184 days with 100-seed mass of 10.6 g. Both the hybrids are suitable for deep Vertisols.<br />

KB Saxena and Mula Guerrero Myer<br />

Milestone 5A.1.1.4: Elite pigeonpea hybrids evaluated for their resistance to major insects and diseases<br />

(HCS/SP/ KBS, 2009).<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of pigeonpea. Chemical control of H.<br />

armigera is costly, and also leads to development of resistance to insecticides. There is a need to develop insect<br />

resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore, we evaluated the pigeonpea hybrid<br />

parents and hybrids for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during the 2009 rainy season to identify cultivars<br />

with resistance/tolerance to this pest for use in pigeonpea improvement. Six hybrids along with two pairs of<br />

maintainer/male-sterile lines, 9 varieties, and nine restorer lines in the short duration group; and 10 hybrids,<br />

three pairs of A/B lines, and 10 restorer lines, along with four checks were evaluated for resistance under field<br />

conditions. There were three replications in a randomized complete block design. Data were recorded on H.<br />

armigera damage, recovery and overall resistance scores visually, pod damage, egg and larval numbers per 5<br />

inflorescences, and grain yield. Damage by H. armigera in all the hybrids in the first flush was very high, and<br />

therefore recovery resistance scores were recorded at maturity (Tables 35, 36). In the short-duration group, the<br />

recovery resistance scores ranged from 7.0 to 9.0, and the genotypes PPE 54-2, ICPL 187-1, ICPL 98008, ICPR<br />

2363, ICPR 2431, and ENT 11 showed moderate levels of recovery resistance, and yield potential 0.35-0.72 t<br />

ha -1 as compared to 0.31 t ha -1 of ICPL 87. These genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H.<br />

armigera. None of the hybrids exhibited tolerance to pod borer damage. In the medium-duration group, the<br />

recovery resistance scores ranged from 5.7 to 8.3, and the genotypes ICPH 2740, ICPH 3461, ICPH 3762, ICPR<br />

2671, ICPR 2740, and ICPL 3762 showed moderate levels of recovery resistance, and yield potential 0.7 t ha -1<br />

as compared to 0.77 t ha -1 of ICPL 87119. These genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H.<br />

armigera (Tables 37, 38).<br />

HC Sharma, KB Saxena and RK Srivastava<br />

A total of 719 genotypes were screened in disease nursery under high-disease inoculum condition at Patancheru.<br />

This material consisted of 40 A/B lines, 198 short and medium-duration hybrids, and 481 R-lines. A total of<br />

116 genotypes were found to have combined resistant to wilt and SM. Twenty-seven lines had resistance to wilt<br />

disease only, while 187 lines showed resistance to only SM disease. The remaining 387 lines were susceptible to<br />

both the diseases.<br />

H C Sharma, Suresh Pande and KB Saxena<br />

Output Target 5A.2: Genetically diverse pigeonpea hybrid parents (about 5-10 A lines and 10-15 R lines)<br />

with resistance to major biotic stresses developed (2009).<br />

Activity 5A.2.1: Development of high-yielding pigeonpea hybrid parents with resistance to major biotic<br />

stresses.<br />

Milestone 5A.2.1.1: At least six A 4 male-sterile and 15 fertility restorer lines with resistance to wilt and sterility<br />

mosaic disease developed (KBS/KML/SP, 2007).<br />

Based on disease resistance six resistant male-sterile lines were selected. Of these, one R-line was of shortduration<br />

and the remaining of medium-duration. Similarly, out of 314 R-lines, 74 lines were resistant to SM and<br />

wilt diseases and these were used in making hybrids.<br />

KB Saxena and Suresh Pande<br />

229


Milestone 5A.2.1.2: At least six promising maintainers of A 4 cytoplasm improved for agronomic traits (seed and<br />

pod size and disease resistance) through backcrossing (KBS/KML, 2009).<br />

A total of 14 A-lines with A 4 cytoplasm were used for improving agronomic traits. The traits selected for<br />

improvement in different lines by back crossing were wilt and sterility mosaic resistance, seed color<br />

(particularly white), seed size, primary/secondary branches, and pod number. The materials used in<br />

backcrossing were from BC 1 to BC 5 generations.<br />

KB Saxena and Suresh Pande<br />

Output target 5A.3: Pigeonpea hybrid parents (25-30 A-lines and 50-55 R-lines) characterized for<br />

important agronomic traits and molecular diversity (2009).<br />

Activity 5A.3.1: Assessing the agronomic and molecular diversity of pigeonpea hybrid parental lines.<br />

Milestone 5A.3.1.1: A/B- and R- lines characterized for important agronomic traits (KBS/KML/HCS/SP, 2008).<br />

Maintainers: In 2009, a total of 22 medium-duration maintainer (B-) lines were evaluated in two trials in RBD<br />

with two replications in four-row plots. ICPB 2078, 2047, 2048, and 2092 were found to be resistant to wilt and<br />

SM diseases. These lines produced good yields when compared to both the checks.<br />

Restorers: Fifty-seven fertility restorer (R-) lines were evaluated in three trials in RBD with two replications in<br />

four-row plots. Of these, 42 belonged to medium-duration and the remaining 15 to the long-duration group.<br />

ICPR 2671, 3762, 3477, 4437, and 4013 were found to be resistant to both wilt and SM diseases.<br />

KB Saxena, H C Sharma and Suresh Pande<br />

Milestone 5A.3.1.2: Available male sterile (A/B) and fertility restorer (R) lines characterized using molecular<br />

markers (KBS/RKV, 2009).<br />

Development of mapping populations segregating for fertility restoring gene(s): Four diverse hybrids were<br />

selected for developing mapping populations. The parents for crossing and raising of mapping populations were<br />

grown under nylon net coverings to eliminate cross - pollination. The cross combinations (ICPA 2039 × ICPR<br />

2438, ICPA 2039 × ICPR 2447, ICPA 2043 × ICPR 2671, and ICPA 2043 × ICPR 3467) were made and the<br />

resultant F 1 s were raised and their F 2 seeds were collected from single F 1 plants. All the F 2 plants were selfed to<br />

obtain the F 2:3 mapping populations.<br />

Identification of molecular markers linked to fertility restorer (Fr) gene(s) of A 4 CMS system: A total of<br />

98 and 145 simple sequences repeat (SSR) markers showed polymorphism in cross ICPA 2039 × ICPR 2447<br />

and ICPA 2043 × ICPR 2671, respectively. All the identified polymorphic markers will be used for genotyping<br />

of 188 progenies of F 2 mapping populations. The phenotyping data obtained in combination with genotyping<br />

data will be analyzed to identify QTLs showing higher phenotypic variations for fertility restoration.<br />

Rajeev Kumar Varshney and KB Saxena<br />

Output Target 5A.4: Seed production technology for pigeonpea hybrids and their parents improved<br />

(2009).<br />

Activity 5A.4.1: Developing an efficient seed production technology for pigeonpea hybrids and their parents.<br />

Milestone 5A.4.1.1: Improved seed production technology for pigeonpea hybrids and their parents developed<br />

(KBS/KML, 2009).<br />

The seed production of hybrids (A x R) and maintainers (A x B) were taken up under different plant populations<br />

under June and July sowings. Two row ratios (3 female : 1 male) and (4 female : 1 male) were used. The<br />

results indicated that spacing of 75cm x 30 cm with 4 female: 1 male ratio was more productive under irrigated<br />

conditions. The highest yield (1693 kg ha -1 ) was obtained in time sowings. In July sowings, in A x B seed<br />

production in 120 x 40 cm with 4:1 row ratio has produced 1769 kg ha -1 . The highest in A x R yield was 2053<br />

kg ha -1 recorded in July sowings.<br />

KB Saxena and Mula Guerrero Myer<br />

230


Milestone 5A.4.1.2: A hybrid seed production manual published (KBS, 2006).<br />

A hybrid pigeonpea seed production manual was published in English in 2008. The short- version of this manual<br />

was prepared in Marathi and Myanmari language. The Kannada version is also being prepared for the benefit of<br />

scientists and seed producers.<br />

KB Saxena<br />

Output Target 5A5: Efficiency of hybrid pigeonpea breeding improved through strategic research (<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Activity 5A.5.1: Conduct strategic research to improve the efficiency of hybrid breeding.<br />

Milestone 5A.5.1.1: Cytology and genetics of A 4 CMS system and its fertility restorers investigated (KBS/VD, 2007).<br />

Milestone 5A.5.1.2: Genotype - environment interaction for the expression of male-sterility and fertility<br />

restoration assessed (KBS/VKD/KML, 2009).<br />

This research was also conducted under a Ph.D. program. The results were included in 2008 <strong>Archival</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

and later published in International Journal.<br />

KB Saxena and Vijay Kumar Dalvi<br />

Milestone 5A.5.1.3: New sources of cytoplasm identified and diverse CMS systems developed (KBS/NM/KML,<br />

<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

A wild species C. reticulatus was used to breed a new CMS source. In 2008, two seeds were produced from a<br />

cross between C.reticulatus x ICPB 2043. From this, only one germinated and produced a plant that was 60%<br />

male-sterile. On this partial male-sterile plant, four elite lines were crossed to develop new A-lines. Among<br />

these, a cross made with ICPL 85030 produced two seeds and the plants were 100% male-sterile. A close<br />

perusal of flower showed that in addition to male-sterility, these plants were also heterostyly (long style and<br />

short stamens). Further backcrosses with ICPL 85030 were made to advance the generation.<br />

In continuation of the 2009 experiment to identify CMS lines with A 5 cytoplasm, 118 lines obtained as a result<br />

of crossing 2 lines, which had more number of 100% male-sterile plants and their fertile siblings with high<br />

pollen fertility were grown in the field. In 118 lines, 6 had higher number of male-sterile plants with high pollen<br />

fertility in their fertile siblings. Sterile plants were 100 % pollen sterile and fertility in the fertile plants ranged<br />

from 78 to 98 %.<br />

KB Saxena and Nalini Mallikarjuna<br />

Output target 5A.6: Trait-based breeding populations developed for selecting elite hybrid pigeonpea<br />

parental lines (2011).<br />

Activity 5A.6.1: Development of trait specific (diverse maturity, disease resistance, seed and pod size)<br />

breeding populations for selecting new maintainers and restorers.<br />

Milestone 5A.6.1.1: For each trait, about 10-12 genetically diverse lines will be identified and crossed in a<br />

half-diallel mating scheme to generate B and R breeding populations for selection (KBS/KML/SP, 2011).<br />

To broaden the genetic base of B-lines, a nuclear background diversification program was initiated. These<br />

crosses were made using B-lines of A 4 cytoplasm belonging to early (DT x DT = 4 crosses, NDT x DT = 6<br />

crosses) and medium (NDT x NDT = 9 crosses) maturity groups. In early maturity group, a total of 750 plants<br />

were grown, while in medium maturity 920 plants were grown. Single plant selections were done during 2009 –<br />

<strong>2010</strong> for diversity in various agronomic traits such as days to flower, maturity, 100-seed weight, number of pods,<br />

seeds pod -1 , seed coat color etc. Continuous heavy rains led to severe plant mortality due to water-logging and<br />

Phytophthora blight. The selected lines were grown under a net to prevent out-crossing and for obtaining pure<br />

seeds of the next filial generation.<br />

The F 2 populations were generated from crosses made in a diallel mating design (resistant x resistant for both<br />

wilt and sterility mosaic diseases) using 15 elite wilt and sterility mosaic resistant lines. Of these, 60 F 3<br />

populations belonged to early maturity group and 36 F 3 populations belonged to the medium maturity group.<br />

Single plant selections were made for diversity in various agronomic traits such as days to flower, maturity, 100-<br />

seed weight, number of pods, seeds pod -1 , and seed coat color.<br />

KB Saxena and Rakesh K Srivastava<br />

231


Output Target 5A.7: Hybrid pigeonpea technology exchange, capacity building of partners and<br />

documentation (<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Activity 5A.7.1: Exchange improved technologies and new knowledge with ARIs, NARS, NGOs, private<br />

sector, and farmers’ groups.<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.1: <strong>ICRISAT</strong> partnerships with NARS and Hybrid Parents Research Consortium Partners<br />

strengthened (KBS/CLLG/SP, annual).<br />

The partnerships evolved for the development of hybrid seed production, and research and development<br />

activities were-Hybrid Parents Research Consortium, Public sector support companies, NARS of India, China<br />

and Myanmar. With this support we evaluated several hybrids. The promising hybrids identified were ICPH<br />

2671, ICPH 2740, ICPH 3762, and ICPH 2433.<br />

In China, large-scale seed production of ICPH 2671 in isolation is in progress. Farmers are liking this hybrid<br />

and there is a chance to increase land area under it.<br />

In Myanmar, a total of 61 hybrids were made by crossing four CMS lines (ICPA 2043, ICPA 2047, ICPA 2048,<br />

and ICPA 2092) with <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s improved cultivars and local varieties, and these were evaluated in Myingyan,<br />

Sebin, Nyaungoo and Zaloke Research Farms. These hybrids will be resynthesized for evaluation in the multilocational<br />

trials in Myanmar. In Myingyan, seven hybrids (ICPH 3497, 2740, 2671, 3462, 3341, 3337, and<br />

3467) produced significantly high yield (1575 to 1890 kg ha -1 ) than the local check Monywashwedinga (1106<br />

kg ha -1 ). In Sebin, ICPH 3462, ICPH 2673, ICPH 3467, ICPH 2751, and ICPH 2671 exhibited high yield of<br />

1976 to 2396 kg ha -1 . In Zaloke, eight hybrids ICPH 3497, 2740, 2751, 3461, 3477, 2671, 2673, and 3341<br />

produced 2003 to 2309 kg ha -1 . In the present study significant standard heterosis was recorded in the<br />

multilocation trials and four hybrids (ICPH 3497, 2740, 2671, 2673,) were outstanding across the locations.<br />

These hybrids yielded 1846 to 1967 kg ha -1 grain with 32.1 to 40.7% superiority over the control,<br />

Monywashwedinga. In these trials, it was also observed that high yield recorded in the hybrids was positively<br />

related to the number of pods plant -1 (r = 0.67**). Hybrids ICPH 3477 and ICPH 3461 were better adapted in<br />

Zaloke where it produced high yield of 2217 and 2259 kg ha -1 respectively.<br />

KB Saxena, CL Laxmipathi Gowda and Suresh Pande<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.2: Seeds of elite parental lines, and hybrids multiplied and distributed to NARS and seed<br />

companies (KBS, annual).<br />

Seed production of A-lines: Three medium-duration A-lines were multiplied in isolations. These include ICPA<br />

2043, ICPA 2047 and ICPA 2092. Among these ICPA 2043 was grown in two different isolations with a total<br />

area of 0.8 ha. The total seed obtained from these isolations was 262 kg. ICPA 2047 (A x B) was grown in 1.34<br />

ha in three isolations. The 665 kg seed was obtained from these isolations. ICPA 2092 was grown in 0.5 ha but<br />

due to severe Alternaria blight damage only 20 kg of seed was harvested.<br />

Seed production of R–lines: In 2009, two lines ICPR 2671 and ICPR 3762 were multiplied in isolation at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> and in the farmers’ field in Medak district. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, 600 kg seed of ICPR 2671 was obtained<br />

from 0.77 ha area. Also 150 kg seed of ICPR 3762 was harvested from 0.18 ha area. About 1500 kg of ICPR<br />

2671 seed was harvested from 2.2 ha isolated area in farmers’field at Zaheerabad, whereas 2580 kg of ICPR<br />

2671 seed was harvested from a 2.4 ha isolation in Kandi village of Medak district.<br />

Seed production of hybrids: The seed production of four hybrids was taken at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> during 2009 season.<br />

Of these, one was of short-duration, (ICPH 2438) and three (ICPH 2671, ICPH 2740, and ICPH 3762) of<br />

medium-duration. Due to severe Maruca damage only 10 kg of ICPH 2438 hybrid seed was harvested. The<br />

seed production of hybrid ICPH 2671 was taken up in 0.8 ha with two sowing dates (18 June and 8 July <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

with variable row-to-row and plant-to-plant spacing 288 kg seed obtained from this plot. The seed production of<br />

second hybrid ICPH 2740 was taken up in 0.32 ha under unirrigated conditions on 8 th July, 2009. The initial<br />

growth of crop was good but it could not pick up its growth in the later stages due to insufficient moisture at<br />

podding stage and yielded 200 kg seed from 0.32 ha. ICPH 3762 was multiplied in isolation in 0.32 ha plant.<br />

Due to plant losses only 60 kg seed yield was obtained.<br />

Hybrid seed production in farmers’ fields: For the first time, we explored the possibility of hybrid seed<br />

production in farmers’ fields in Zaheerabad and Medak districts. In Zaheerabad, 3.1 ha were sown for seed<br />

production of ICPH 2671, ICPH 2740, and ICPH 3461. The appreciable seed quantity was not obtained due to<br />

232


low- bee activity for pollinating A-lines. Since this is a new technology, the farmer at Kandi took seed<br />

production of hybrid under 6 male rows with a single row of A-line. The seed obtained from three (ICPH 2671-<br />

50 kg; ICPH 2740- 195 kg; ICPH 3461- 30 kg) hybrids was 275 kg, which is comparatively low.<br />

Seed distribution: A total of 492 seed samples were supplied to NARS and international scientists, and farmers.<br />

A total of 17,200 kg of hybrid seed was distributed in six states and sowings were done on 3437 ha. Among<br />

these, Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh covered more than 1000 ha under hybrid cultivation. This was<br />

followed by Gujarat (444 ha), Maharashtra (409 ha), and Jharkhand (230 ha).<br />

KB Saxena and Mula Guerrero Myer<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.3: Technical information and public awareness literature developed and disseminated<br />

(KBS/HCS/ SP, 2007).<br />

Information regarding hybrid seed production technology was developed. Based on the experience gained, a<br />

technology on pigeonpea CMS line and hybrid seed production was developed. This technology provides the<br />

guidance on row ratio, spacing between and within plants and proper management practices for A,B, and R lines.<br />

However, this technology needs tuning based on different environmental conditions. This knowledge was<br />

disseminated to several farmers, seed production officers and scientists.<br />

KB Saxena, H C Sharma, Suresh Pande and Mula Guerrero Myer<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.4: Capacity of NARS and seed sector scientists/technicians in hybrid breeding strengthened<br />

(KBS/KML, annual).<br />

In 2009, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> organized three training programs. A total of 203 persons were trained. This includes 30<br />

scientists, 56 seed production officers, and 117 farmers. Seed production plots in Zaheerabad and Medak district<br />

was closely monitored and the experiences gained were used for designing seed production plots in subsequent<br />

seasons. The monitoring of several on-farm trials was done by pigeonpea scientists and staff in Maharashtra,<br />

Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh.<br />

KB Saxena and Mula Guerrero Myer<br />

Milestone 5A.7.1.5: Molecular markers and genetic maps developed and exchanged with the scientific<br />

community (RV/DAH/ KML/HDU/NM/KBS, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Identification of informative SSR markers for hybrid purity assessment: Two subsets of 42 SSR markers<br />

for crosses ICPA 2039 × ICPR 2438 and ICPA 2043 × ICPR 2671 that gave high quality amplification were<br />

selected for assessing the purity of hybrid seeds. To assess the reliability of these SSR markers, 183 and 174<br />

individual seeds from seed lots of ICPH 2438 and ICPH 2671, respectively were obtained from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

These were analyzed together with seeds of parental lines.<br />

Analysis of markers on DNA samples of 183 seeds from seed lot of ICPH 2438 showed hybrid purity (alleles<br />

from both A- and R- lines) in 96.33% of cases. Similarly, 174 seeds from seed lot of ICPH 2671 showed hybrid<br />

purity in 94.76% of cases. With an objective to reduce the costs and time in PCR assays for purity assessment,<br />

an effort was made to define marker groups based on allele sizes for undertaking multiplex assay for all the 42<br />

marker each for both hybrids. As a result, 35 out of 42 markers for ICPH 2671 could be grouped into 9 groups<br />

and appropriate groups could not be defined for remaining 7 markers. Similarly for ICPH 2438, 26 out of 42<br />

informative markers could be grouped in 12 marker groups. Interestingly, four (CcM0257, CcM1559, CcM1825<br />

and CcM1895) out of eight common informative markers for assessing purity of both the hybrids could be<br />

grouped together for undertaking multiplex assay.<br />

Rajeev Kumar Varshney and KB Saxena<br />

Other <strong>Report</strong>s<br />

Performance of Hybrids in On-farm Trials<br />

In 2009, a total of 112 on-farm trials of three promising hybrids ICPH 2740, ICPH 3762, and ICPH 2671 were<br />

conducted in farmers’ fields in the states of Karnataka, Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Andhra Pradesh. On<br />

average, the hybrids showed 28% superiority over control variety. Exciting results were obtained from some of<br />

the farmers in the on-farm trials. Three farmers harvested record yields of over 4 tons ha -1 on their farms (Table<br />

4). One of the farmers in Medak district of Andhra Pradesh received ‘Best Farmer Award 2009’ for harvesting<br />

3300 kg ha -1 of grains from his 3.2 hectare plot (Table 5) and fetched a net profit of Rs.2,68,000. This<br />

information showed that the hybrid technology has a potential of breaking the barrier of stagnant yield in<br />

pigeonpea.<br />

233


Inheritance of Fertility Restoration of A 4 CMS system<br />

Inheritance of fertility restoration of A 4 - based cytoplasmic-nuclear male-sterility system was studied using F 1<br />

and segregating populations (F 2 and BC 1 F 1 ) of five crosses made between male-sterile and male-fertile lines.<br />

One extra-early, two early, and two medium-maturing hybrids were studied to generate information on the<br />

genetics of fertility restoration. The results suggested that in extra-early group the pollen fertility was controlled<br />

by a single dominant gene; while in early and medium-maturing group the male - fertility was governed by two<br />

duplicate dominant genes.<br />

In another study, two A-lines having A 4 cytoplasm were crossed with four fertility restoring lines and two malefertility<br />

restoring genes segregating independently were identified. In the four male parents (ICPR 2438, ICPR<br />

2447, ICPR 2671, and ICPR 3467) two dominant genes were found to be involved in the expression of fertility<br />

restoration with duplicate dominant gene action. Studies will be conducted to establish relationship among<br />

various fertility restoring alleles.<br />

Allelic relationships of different fertility restoring genes<br />

To understand more clearly if the genes governing fertility restoration were the same or different in the known<br />

restorer lines (A 4 system), a study was initiated to carry out allelism test. A set of 27 known restorer lines were<br />

selected for crossing. The F 1 s of these crosses were crossed again with one A 1 (ICPA 2030) cytoplasm and four<br />

A 4 (ICPA 2039, ICPA 2089, ICPA 2043, and ICPA 2092) cytoplasm A- lines. The populations generated from<br />

these crosses were scored for fertility restoration. A total of 1080 plants from ICPA 2089 - based crosses; 1900<br />

for ICPA 2039; 4820 for ICPA 2043; 800 for ICPA 2092 were grown in a wilt free plot. Individual plants of<br />

these crosses were scored for fertility restoration during 2009 rainy season. Data analysis is in progress.<br />

Incorporation of Obcordate Leaf Marker in A/B Lines<br />

To facilitate grow-out test, a simply inherited trait designated as ‘obcordate leaf’ is being introduced in A/B<br />

lines. These genotypes when crossed with normal leaf cultivars produce hybrid plants with normal leaves and<br />

non-hybrids (sibs) will have obcordate leaves. This test is simple and can be performed early plant growth stage.<br />

Table 1: Important agronomic traits of 15 hybrids selected from the three MLTs, conducted in 2009<br />

Trial Hybrid Mean seed yield Yield gain Days to 100-seed Wilt<br />

(kg ha -1 ) (%) over flower mature wt (g) (%)<br />

hybrid/ check* check*<br />

MLT 1 ICPH 3491 2945/2247 (122) 31 119 153 11.6 7 0<br />

ICPH 3762 2737/2247 22 115 149 10.8 0 0<br />

ICPH 2740 2616/2247 16 115 149 11.3 0 0<br />

ICPH 2751 2561/2247 14 117 151 11.4 0 0<br />

ICPH 3359 2512/2247 12 118 151 10.8 6 18<br />

MLT 2 ICPH 3464 2381/1566 (120) 52 109 146 11.2 31 8<br />

ICPH 3341 2317/1566 48 117 150 10.8 0 14<br />

ICPH 2673 2261/1566 44 119 151 9.5 6 50<br />

ICPH 3472 2101/1566 34 112 146 10.7 7 0<br />

ICPH 3340 2104/1566 34 118 156 10.9 26 32<br />

MLT 3 ICPH 3763 2411/1715 (121) 41 122 152 10.6 6 24<br />

ICPH 4017 2395/1715 40 122 155 9.5 28 17<br />

ICPH 3759 2139/1715 25 121 152 10.7 24 0<br />

ICPH 4012 2136/1715 25 122 152 9.2 6 6<br />

ICPH 3761 2073/1715 21 121 155 10.4 24 24<br />

*Asha check<br />

( ) The data in parentheses indicate days to flowering of control cultivar Asha.<br />

SM<br />

(%)<br />

234


Table 2. Summary performance of hybrid ICPH 2740 and control cultivar Asha in multi-location trials (2005 to 2008)<br />

Trait 2005<br />

(n=7)<br />

2006<br />

(n=7)<br />

2007<br />

(n=12)<br />

2008<br />

(n=7)<br />

Mean<br />

(n=33)<br />

Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Hybrid 3652 2407 2758 2208 2756<br />

Control 2215 1582 2592 1607 1999<br />

100-seed wt (g)<br />

Hybrid 10.6 10.4 11.0 11.3 10.8<br />

Control 11.1 10.7 10.8 11.2 10.9<br />

Maturity (days)<br />

Hybrid 186 188 180 172 182<br />

Control 190 190 182 171 183<br />

Flowering (days)<br />

Hybrid 129 125 122 116 123<br />

Control 133 130 123 116 126<br />

Plant height (cm)<br />

Hybrid 235 212 222 226 224<br />

Control 215 203 215 208 210<br />

Seeds pod -1<br />

Hybrid 4.0 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.9<br />

Control 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.7<br />

Wilt (%)<br />

Hybrid 0 0 50* 19 23<br />

Control 0 0 8 0 2<br />

SM (%)<br />

Hybrid 0 8 0 0 3<br />

Control 6 9 0 0 4<br />

*data estimated on only eight plants<br />

Table 3. Summary performance of hybrid ICPH 3762 and control cultivar Asha in<br />

multi- location trials from 2007 to 2008<br />

Trait<br />

2007 2008 Mean<br />

(n=1) (n=7) (n=8)<br />

Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Hybrid 2878 1821 2350<br />

Control 2592 1607 2099<br />

100-seed wt (g)<br />

Hybrid 10.4 10.8 10.6<br />

Control 10.8 11.2 11<br />

Maturity (days)<br />

Hybrid 184 171 178<br />

Control 182 171 177<br />

Flowering (days)<br />

Hybrid 126 115 121<br />

Control 123 116 120<br />

Plant height (cm)<br />

Hybrid 272 222 247<br />

Control 215 208 212<br />

Seeds pod -1<br />

Hybrid 3.8 3.9 3.9<br />

Control 3.8 3.9 3.9<br />

Wilt (%)<br />

Hybrid 8 0 4<br />

Control 8 0 4<br />

SM (%)<br />

Hybrid 8 0 4<br />

Control 0 0 0<br />

235


Table 4. Record yields produced by some hybrid pigeonpea farmers in Amravati and<br />

Yavatmal districts of Maharashtra in 2009<br />

Hybrid Area Yield (kg ha -1 ) %<br />

Name & Village name sown (m 2 ) hybrid check Gain<br />

SB Kale, Salod ICPH 2671 450 3956 2044 94<br />

PK Satav, Nimgaon ICPH 2671 1012 3951 2469 60<br />

DV Chopde, Kothoda ICPH 2671 450 4667 3556 31<br />

YS Shrotri, Tamoli ICPH 2671 450 3889 2278 71<br />

RK Warekar, P’Kawada ICPH 2740 450 4148 2963 40<br />

VB Kadam, Tamoli ICPH 2740 338 4444 2667 67<br />

BK Warekar, P’Kawada ICPH 2740 338 4444 2963 50<br />

Mean 4214 2706 56<br />

Table 5: List of on-farm trials of ICPH 2671 hybrid in different locations of India, 2009 season<br />

Actual Hybrid Check<br />

Area<br />

State Farmer name Location<br />

yield yield yield<br />

(ac)<br />

(kg) (kg ha -1 ) (kg ha -1 )<br />

Andhra<br />

Pradesh<br />

Janardhan, G<br />

Chautukur,<br />

Jogipet 8.0 10400 3250 750<br />

Shri Ranga Rao Karimnagar 0.5 700 3500 -<br />

Maharashtra Porwal, G R Palodi 1.0 NA 3200 2100<br />

Barhate, A V Manwat 1.0 NA 3000 2150<br />

Patil, S D Nandkheda 1.0 NA 3500 2500<br />

Gaikwad,B B Hingoli 1.0 NA 3700 3000<br />

Changde, V D Mehkar 0.25 350 3500 1000<br />

Shrotri ,Y K Tamoli NA NA 3889 2778<br />

Sachin ,V K Tamoli NA NA 4444 2963<br />

Vasudev T W Palodi NA NA 3704 2963<br />

Karnataka Kallyanappa, E W Allur, Aland NA NA 3750 1850<br />

Mardandappa<br />

Madhya<br />

Pradesh<br />

Nagappa Bennur NA NA 2500 2200<br />

Kasturbagram,<br />

KVK Indore 1.0 1100 2750 -<br />

I. Sorghum<br />

Output 5B: Enhanced molecular genetic and phenotyping platforms for drought and salinity screening<br />

and parental lines of hybrid sorghum, pearl millet and pigeonpea with improved tolerance to abiotic<br />

stresses, made available to partners biennially (from 2008) with associated knowledge and capacity<br />

building in SAT Asia.<br />

Output target 5B.1: At least five salinity-tolerant sorghum breeding lines/populations and a mapping<br />

population developed (2009)<br />

Activity 5B.1.1: Developing/identifying salinity-tolerant improved breeding lines/populations and associated<br />

QTL<br />

Milestone 5B.1.1.1.1: Two sweet sorghum breeding lines tolerant to drought stress developed /identified<br />

(PSR/BVSR/VV, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Moisture stress is a key abiotic stress limiting the productivity of many crops and sweet sorghum is not an<br />

exception. Mid-season moisture stress during the rainy season and terminal moisture stress in postrainy season<br />

are common. Hence it is important to breed for both the stresses separately for season-wise adaptation.<br />

The following trials were conducted for postrainy season adaptation<br />

236


1. Evaluation of sweet sorghum genotypes for postrainy season adaptation: A total of 90 genotypes<br />

comprising sweet sorghum hybrid parental lines, hybrids, varieties and germplasms accessions were<br />

evaluated along with five checks, namely ICSV 112 (high grain yielding variety), R 16(drought susceptible<br />

check), B 35 (stay-green, drought tolerant check), E 36-1(both stay-green and sweet sorghum variety) and<br />

NTJ 2 (sweet sorghum variety) during the postrainy season 2009 in RCBD with two-replications. The<br />

sugar yield in the test entries ranged from 0.03 to 1.1 t ha -1 (E 36-1: 0.22 t ha -1 ). Seventy nine genotypes<br />

were superior to the best performing drought-tolerant check (E 36-1 0.22 t ha -1 ). Among all the genotypes,<br />

days to 50% flowering ranged from 74 to 86 days (E 36-: 74 days), stalk yield ranged from 2.6 to 15.6 t ha -1<br />

(E 36-1: 4.16 t ha -1 ) and grain yield ranged from 0.26 t ha -1 to 0.90 t ha -1 (E 36-1 1.5 t ha -1 ). In trial 2, the<br />

sugar yield ranged from 0.1 to 0.7 t ha -1 (E36-1: 0.39 t ha -1 ) and sixty five genotypes were superior to the<br />

best performing drought-tolerant check (E36-1: 0.39 t ha -1 ). The days to 50% flowering ranged from 68 to<br />

88 days (E36-1: 74 days); stalk yield ranged from 2.2 to 10.8 t ha -1 (E36-1: 4.1 t ha -1 ) and grain yield ranged<br />

from 0.1to 1.6 t ha -1 (E36-1: 0.25 t ha -1 ).<br />

2. Screening of sweet sorghum genotypes for terminal moisture stress: A total of 99 genotypes comprising<br />

sweet sorghum hybrid parental lines, hybrids, varieties and germplasms accessions were evaluated along<br />

with five checks namely, ICSV 112 (high grain yielding variety), R 16(drought susceptible check), B<br />

35(stay-green, drought tolerant check), E 36-1(both stay-green and sweet sorghum variety) and NTJ 2<br />

(sweet sorghum variety) during the postrainy season 2009 in RCBD with two-replications. Irrigation was<br />

with held at 55 days after sowing. The ANOVA for mean sum of squares showed that the genotypic<br />

differences were significant for sugar yield and related traits. Among these genotypes, the varieties ICSV<br />

25294 (2.36 t ha -1 ), ICSV 93046 (1.78 t ha -1 ), ICSV 25312 (1.71 t ha -1 ), ICSV 25298 (1.70 t ha -1 ), ICSV<br />

25308 (1.65 t ha -1 ), ICSV 25300 (1.64 t ha -1 ), ICSV 25316 (1.63 t ha -1 ) were highly and significantly<br />

superior over the best performing check E 36-1 (0.62 t ha -1 ) for sugar yield.<br />

The following trials were conducted for rainy season adaptation<br />

1. Evaluation of sweet sorghum genotypes for rainy season adaptation: This trial was constituted with 68<br />

improved sweet sorghum genotypes and evaluated during the rainy season <strong>2010</strong> in RCBD in 3 replications<br />

along with four checks CSH 22SS, Urja, JK Recova and RSSV9. The days to 50% flowering in the test<br />

entries ranged from 63 to 80 days (R16: 63 days) and the stalk yield varied ranged from 11.0 t ha -1 to 72.4 t<br />

ha -1 (CSH 22 SS: 39.7 t ha -1 ). Forty three genotypes were recorded higher stalk yields than the best<br />

performing check (CSH 22 SS: 39.7 t ha -1 ). The genotype (Ch 14 × SSV 84)-10-1-1 recorded the highest<br />

stalk yield which is 72.4 t ha -1 . The Brix % ranged from 11.1 to 18.0 (Urja: 18.0).The sugar yield ranged<br />

from 0.2 t ha -1 to 2.8 t ha -1 (Urja: 1.45 t ha -1 ) and 27 entries recorded higher sugar yield than the best<br />

performing check Urja. The genotype (Ch-14 x SSV 84)-10-1-1 recorded highest sugar yield with 2.28 tha -1<br />

followed by ICSV 25315 (1.9 t ha -1 ).<br />

2. Screening of sweet sorghum genotypes for mid-season moisture stress: A total of 210 genotypes<br />

comprising sweet sorghum hybrids, varieties and B-lines were evaluated along with five checks that include<br />

ICSV 112 (high grain yielding variety), R 16(drought susceptible check), B 35(stay-green, drought tolerant<br />

check), E 36-1(both stay-green and sweet sorghum variety) and NTJ 2 (sweet sorghum variety) in<br />

augmented design during the <strong>2010</strong> summer season for identifying genotypes with mid-season moisture<br />

stress tolerance. Data were recorded for the traits are vigor score, wilting score, days to 50% flowering,<br />

plant height (m), stalk weight (t ha -1 ), juice weight (t ha -1 ), Brix%, bagasse (t ha -1 ), sugar yield (t ha -1 ).<br />

P. Srinivasa Rao and Belum VS Reddy<br />

II. Pearl millet<br />

Output target 5B.1: At least five salinity-tolerant improved breeding lines/ populations of pearl millet<br />

identified and feasibility of breeding salinity tolerant hybrids assessed (VV/KNR/RB) (2009)<br />

Activity 5B 1.1: Develop salinity-tolerant lines and populations in pearl millet and assess their hybrid<br />

potential under saline conditions<br />

SK. 13 Milestone 5B.1.1.1: Inbred lines and populations identified as salinity-tolerant in preliminary<br />

evaluations re-evaluated for their salinity tolerance and yield potential (KNR/SKG/VV, 2008)<br />

SK 14.Milestone 5B.1.1.2: Relationship between the salinity tolerance of hybrids and their parental lines<br />

assessed (<strong>2010</strong>) (KNR/SKG/VV)<br />

237


Output target 5B.2: Putative QTLs for salinity tolerance of grain and stover yield identified in pearl<br />

millet (2009)<br />

Activity 5B.2.1: Genotyping and phenotyping of mapping populations for salinity tolerance<br />

Milestone 5B.2.1.1: Putative QTL for salinity tolerance based on 160 RILs from one mapping population<br />

identified (CTH/SS/VV, 2009)<br />

Salinity is a complex trait and the identification of molecular markers for tolerance to salinity would greatly help<br />

the breeding of that trait in popular varieties. Pearl millet is considered as mildly salinity tolerant. However,<br />

breeding materials that are parent of recombinant inbred line populations have been found to be contrasting for<br />

seed yield under salt stress. This work was undertaken to assess the seed and biomass yield (and related<br />

parameters) in a RIL populations having contrasting parents.<br />

RILs were planted in 25 cm diameter pots, filled with 10kg of Alfisol. Salt treatment consisted of an application<br />

of 150 mM NaCl solution in sufficient amount to saturate the soil profile. This corresponded to a 1.41 g/kg<br />

Alfisol. Salt treatment was applied in 3 split doses at sowing (1/3), and approximately 10 and 20 days after<br />

sowing. Subsequent irrigation was done with soft water. Pots were gown outside, buried in the ground, and<br />

plants harvested at maturity. Three trials were performed in different seasons. A segregating population of pearl<br />

millet comprising of 138 F7 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> from the cross between<br />

parents contrasting for salinity tolerance (ICMB 841, tolerant; 863B, sensitive) was evaluated under saline and<br />

non-saline conditions in summer 2007 and 2008.<br />

Substantial variation for salinity tolerance was found for shoot biomass ratio (shoot biomass under<br />

salinity/control) and grain yield. Shoot biomass (68%) was less adversely affected than yield and related<br />

parameters, which showed a 86% reduction. A linkage map using 77 SSR markers was constructed and<br />

composite interval mapping revealed QTL for grain yield, flowering time and productive tiller number on LG 3,<br />

5 and 1 respectively which expressed only under saline conditions with favorable allele contributed by ICMB<br />

841. Six genomic regions on LG 7 differing/sharing 30 cM had QTLs for plant height, panicle length (LOD 5),<br />

stem dry weight (LOD 4) and shoot dry weight under saline conditions with favorable allele(s) from ICMB 841.<br />

The QTLs mapped for control conditions were almost similar to the previous reports; a QTL with a LOD score<br />

above 10 was identified on LG 6 for individual grain mass under control conditions, with the favorable allele(s)<br />

contributed by 863B.<br />

Given the small effect of the QTL identified, additional QTL with a larger effect have to be identified. Other<br />

RIL populations are being developed for this purpose.<br />

Milestone 5B.2.1.2: Putative QTLs for salinity tolerance based on 35 BC6F3 contiguous segment introgression<br />

lines identified (CTH/SS/VV, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Milestone 5B.2.1.3: New F6 RIL mapping populations for salinity tolerance available in pearl millet for<br />

phenotyping and genotyping (CTH/BVSR/KNR/VV, 2009)<br />

Milestone 5B.3.1.1: Publication of results from marker-assisted selection for the linkage group 2 drought<br />

tolerance QTL into the genetic background of two parental lines (CTH/FRB, 2008)<br />

Milestone 5B.3.1.2: DM resistance and terminal drought tolerance QTLs pyramided in the genetic background<br />

of elite pollinator H 77/833-2 and QTL introgression homozygote product lines available for testing<br />

(CTH/PSK/SS/VV/RPT/RS/KNR, 2007)<br />

Output target 5B.4: Pearl millet germplasm with superior P-acquisition identified (2009)<br />

Activity 5B 4.1: Development of an effective protocol and identification of germplasm with enhanced P-<br />

acquisition ability<br />

Milestone 5B.4.1.1: An effective P-acquisition protocol applicable for large-scale screening developed<br />

(VV/HDU, 2007)<br />

Milestone 5B.4.1.2: Pearl millet germplasm with superior P-acquisition from low-P sources identified (VV,<br />

2009)<br />

238


Milestone 5B.4.1.3: QTL for P acquisition from low P sources identified in pearl millet (VV / CTH, 2011)<br />

Output target 5B.5: At least five pearl millet breeding lines with tolerance to high air temperatures<br />

(>45°C) during reproductive stage developed (2009)<br />

Activity 5B 5.1: Evaluate a diverse range of parental lines, advanced breeding lines and populations for high<br />

temperature tolerance during flowering and grain- filling period; and identify major QTL associated with<br />

this trait.<br />

Milestone 5B.5.1.1: Breeding lines with >70% seedset under field conditions at high temperatures<br />

identified/developed and their tolerance under greenhouse conditions validated (2009) (SKG/KNR/VV)<br />

In summer <strong>2010</strong>, a nursery of about 105 breeding lines including 87 inbreds, 16 germplasm lines and 2<br />

populations was evaluated along with standard check hybrids 9444 and 86M64 (both are known to be heat<br />

tolerant hybrids) at 6 locations (Ahmedabad, Dehgam and Palanpur in Gujarat; Sanchor and Bhinmal in<br />

Rajasthan; and Aligarh in Uttar Pradesh). This nursery included 2 B-lines and 16 germplasm lines identified as<br />

heat tolerant in 2009 the plants which got exposed to the temperature of >42 0 C were considered. The seed set<br />

varied in breeding lines; with maximum of 41 lines in 21-40% Seed Set Class (SSC) followed by 25 in 41-60%<br />

SSC and 7 in 61-80 SSC. Hybrid 86M64 recorded highest mean seed set of 76 %, while the other check hybrid<br />

9444 had 72% seed set. Amongst inbreds, 7 lines (6 B lines and 1 R line) had >60% seed set with ICMB 03555<br />

having highest mean seed set of 67%. Seven other inbreds (6 B-lines and 1 R-line) were found to have 60-70%<br />

seed set SSC. ICTP 8202 had highest overall mean of 64% seed set with wide variation at all the four locations<br />

(29- 96%). Three germplasm lines IP 19799, IP 19877 and IP 19843 had about 45-55% seed set.<br />

Based on the two year multilocational screening (2009 and <strong>2010</strong>) two A/B pairs ICMB 92777 and ICMB 05666<br />

were found to have good seed set at ≥ 42 ◦ C air temperature. Five lines (4 B- and 1 R-line) were found as heat<br />

tolerant on the basis of <strong>2010</strong> screening which needs further validation in multi year and multi location testing.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone 5B.5.1.2: Relationship between hybrids and their parental lines for tolerance to high temperatures<br />

during reproductive stage quantified (<strong>2010</strong>) (KNR/SKG/VV)<br />

Based on the field experiments in 2009, some heat tolerant and heat susceptible parents were identified. In rainy<br />

season <strong>2010</strong>, test crosses were generated utilizing these identified parents. The test crosses along with identified<br />

parents will be screened in summer 2011 for high temperature during reproductive stage to investigate the<br />

relationship between hybrids and their parental lines for tolerance to high temperatures.<br />

SK Gupta, KN Rai and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone 5.1.3: QTL for high temperature tolerance from two diverse mapping populations identified<br />

(KNR/RB/VV, 2012)<br />

Output 5C: Germplasm and improved breeding lines with high and stable grain Fe and Zn density in<br />

sorghum and pearl millet made available to specific partners biennially (from 2008) with associated<br />

knowledge and capacity building.<br />

II. Sorghum<br />

Output 5C: Germplasm and improved breeding lines with high and stable grain Fe and Zn density in<br />

sorghum and pearl millet made available to specific partners biennially (from 2008) with associated<br />

knowledge and capacity building<br />

Output target 5C.1: Sorghum germplasm lines/breeding lines with stable and high grain Fe (40-50 ppm)<br />

and Zn (30-40 ppm) contents identified and their character association, and inheritance studied (2009)<br />

Activity 5C.1.1: Screening of germplasm and breeding lines for grain Fe and Zn and evaluating for grain<br />

yield and agronomic traits.<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.1: At least five sorghum germplasm/breeding lines with stable and high grain Fe (>50 ppm)<br />

and Zn (>40 ppm) contents identified and made available for partners (AAK/BVSR/HDU, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

239


Micronutrient malnutrition (especially of Fe and Zn) is a major health problem in the developing countries.<br />

Biofortification is a cost effective and sustainable solution to combat micronutrient malnutrition. It complements<br />

well the supplementation and fortification methods currently being employed to address micronutrient<br />

malnutrition. Identification of high grain high Fe and Zn lines from the established B-lines and R-lines helps in<br />

quick development of varieties and hybrids.<br />

A total of 250 established sorghum B-lines, two sets of commercial sorghum cultivars (Set I: 22 and Set II: 46<br />

cultivars) were evaluated in RCBD trials with three replications (plot size 2 rows of 2m length) at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-<br />

Patancheru to assess their grain Fe and Zn contents. We also evaluated 41 core germplasm accessions<br />

previously selected for high grain Fe (>50 ppm) and/or grain Zn (>35 ppm) in the 2009 postrainy season.<br />

Hybrid Parents<br />

The grain Fe and Zn contents of 250 B-lines developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> was validated. The mean performance of<br />

the 252 <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred sorghum B-lines evaluated in a three replicated RCBD trial for two years (2008 and<br />

2009 postrainy seasons) for grain Fe and Zn contents had that the lines ranged for grain Fe content from 28 to<br />

48 ppm with an average Fe content of 36 ppm (SE+: 2.83) and for grain Zn content from 14 to 29 ppm with an<br />

average Zn content of 21 ppm (SE+: 1.33). The controls – ICSB 52 and 296B had 35 and 37 ppm grain Fe and<br />

both had 19 ppm grain Zn. Twenty-one B-lines were significantly superior (by 3 to 19%) to the control, 296 B<br />

for grain Fe ranging from 42 to 48 ppm and 3 to 40% superior for grain Zn contents ranging from 21 to 29 ppm.<br />

ICSB 10 (Fe 48 ppm and Zn 24 ppm), ICSB 263 (Fe 47 ppm and Zn 25 ppm), ICSB 399 (Fe 47 ppm and Zn 27<br />

ppm), and ICSB 289 (Fe 42 ppm and Zn 29 ppm) had significantly higher for Fe (by 3 to 19%) and higher Zn<br />

(by 16 to 40%) contents compared to the control 296 B (Fe 37 ppm and Zn 19 ppm).<br />

Hybrids Set 1:<br />

The mean performance of the 22 commercial cultivars for two years (2008 and 2009 postrainy seasons) for grain<br />

Fe content ranged from 30 to 44 ppm (SE+: 2.76) and grain Zn content from 22 to 32 ppm (SE+: 2.00). The<br />

controls - PVK 801 and CSH 16 had 43 and 41 ppm grain Fe and 30 and 28 ppm grain Zn. Four hybrids–NSH<br />

703, GK 4035, Mahabeej 703 and NSH 702 were superior to the control, CSH 16 for grain Fe content that<br />

ranged from 43 to 44 ppm, while six genotypes had grain Zn content ranging from 29 to 33 ppm and were<br />

superior to the control CSH 16. Among the varieties, PVK 801 had higher grain Fe (43 ppm) and Zn contents<br />

(30 ppm) than the other varieties. PVK 801 is a white grained high yielding, grain mold resistant variety and<br />

also has high grain Fe and Zn contents.<br />

Hybrids Set 2:<br />

Evaluation of 46 commercial hybrids showed the Fe contents ranging from 22 to 39 ppm and Zn contents from<br />

15 to 29 ppm with an average Fe content of 32.3 ppm (SE+: 2.24) and average Zn content of 21.4 ppm (SE+:<br />

1.25). Twenty lines had higher grain Fe and Zn contents than the trial mean. The controls PVK 801 and CSH 16<br />

had Fe content 37 and 33 ppm and Zn content 21 and 23 ppm respectively. Three commercial hybrids -<br />

Mahabeej 706 (Fe: 39 ppm; Zn: 25 ppm), KSH 950 (Fe: 39 ppm; Zn: 24 ppm), and HTJH 6290 (Fe: 37 ppm;<br />

Zn: 26 ppm),) were superior for Fe (by 7 to 12%) and Zn contents (by 4 to 10%) than CSH 16. All these four<br />

hybrids were superior (by 6 to 47%) for grain yield also with 3.4 to 4.7 t ha -1 over CSH 16 (2.82 t ha -1 SE+:<br />

0.38) with similar flowering time (68 to 72 days).<br />

In the germplasm accessions trial, the grain samples were collected carefully from experimental plots and under<br />

processing for Fe and Zn estimations.<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.2: Correlations of grain Fe and Zn contents with grain yield and size and agronomic traits<br />

estimated (BVSR, 2008)<br />

A total of 22 commercial sorghum cultivars developed in India by the Indian NARS in partnership with the<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> or the NARS alone were evaluated along with two controls (CSH 16 and PVK 801) during the 2008<br />

and 2009 postrainy seasons at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru to study their mean performance and character<br />

associationships.<br />

Highly significant positive correlation between the grain Fe and Zn content (r = 0.853; P


mechanisms were interconnected for Fe and Zn uptake/translocation in the grains. These results point to the<br />

potential of simultaneous genetic improvement for both the micronutrients.<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.3: G×E interactions for grain Fe and Zn contents assessed (BVSR/HDU, 2008)<br />

A study was carried out at the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> farm in Patancheru, India to determine the effects of micronutrient<br />

fertilization on sorghum grain Fe and Zn contents.<br />

Material used in the study comprised of a set of selected 12 sorghum lines with high and low grain Fe and Zn<br />

contents. These lines were grown on Vertisols and Alfisols with a combination of five different levels of<br />

micronutrients in the 2007 postrainy season. No deficiency of Fe or Zn was observed in these soils based on the<br />

soil test results before experimentation. To rule out the possible confounding effect of the deficiency of other<br />

micronutrients such as boron (B) and sulphur (S), Fe and Zn fertilization was combined with recommended<br />

levels of boron and sulphur. The experiment was laid out in a strip-plot design with three replications. The data<br />

were collected on plant growth traits and grain yield and seed samples were analyzed for grain Fe and Zn<br />

contents estimation.<br />

The analysis of variance indicated significant genetic variability among the genotypes. Soil type did not have<br />

significant effect on grain Fe and Zn content. A non-significant variance due to micronutrient fertilization levels<br />

suggested no influence of soil micronutrient fertilization on grain Fe and Zn contents in any particular soil type.<br />

While no pattern was observed for grain Fe content, grain Zn content seemed to be marginally higher when<br />

grown on the Alfisols than in Vertisols.<br />

Micronutrient application with Fe and Zn fertilizers and soil type has limited effect on grain Fe and Zn contents<br />

when the soils are not deficient in these minerals. Hence, genetic enhancement for grain Fe and Zn-contents<br />

should be given priority.<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Activity 5C 1.2: Conduct inheritance studies and develop mapping populations for Fe and Zn.<br />

Milestone 5C.1.2.1: Genetics of grain Fe and Zn established (AAK/BVSR, 2012)<br />

Understanding the inheritance of the traits help in shaping the breeding programs for improving the grain Fe and<br />

Zn contents.<br />

Two crosses involving contrasting parents were made for developing various filial and backcross generations for<br />

studying the inheritance. Similarly three sets of crosses were using contrasting parents (in diallel fashion) for<br />

study the gene action and combining ability.<br />

1. Different generations will be developed (F 1 , F 2 , BC 1 and BC 2 ) using the contrasting parents for making<br />

crosses (2 crosses for Fe; 2 for Zn and 2 for Fe and Zn) to carry out inheritance studies at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>,<br />

Patancheru. The development of various generations (F 1 , F 2 , BC 1 and BC 2 ) is in progress for studying the<br />

inheritance of grain Fe and Zn contents.<br />

2. The per se performance and gca effects of parents and sca effects of diallel crosses for grain Fe and Zn<br />

contents were assessed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru by evaluation of diallel crosses developed using<br />

contrasting parents (Three trials will be conducted: For Fe and Zn (19 F 1 s and five parents, 3 replications),<br />

for Fe (28 F 1 s and six parents, 3 replications), and for Zn (12 F 1 s and four parents, 3 replications). The<br />

grain analysis for Fe and Zn contents will be carried out in 2011.<br />

3. Genotype and genotype × soil micro nutrients fertilization interactions for grain Fe and Zn contents<br />

assessed in watershed areas at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru or in farmers’ fields (<strong>2010</strong>). The soil samples<br />

collected from two farmer’s fields from Ibrahimbad area, Medak District were analyzed and deficiencies<br />

for micronutrients observed. One field was high for Fe and P, medium for K and low for Zn, b and S.<br />

Another field was high for Fe and low for Zn, B, S, P, and K. An on-farm trial with 12 sorghum cultivars<br />

was planted in above two farmers’ fields in a triplicate trial with external application of Fe, Zn, B and S<br />

(making six possible treatment combinations- 1. No treatment, 2. Fe alone, 3. Zn alone, 4. Fe, B and S, 5.<br />

Zn, B and S and Fe, Zn, B and S).<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

241


II. Pearl millet<br />

Output target 5C.1: Magnitude of variability for grain iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) in more than 300 inbred<br />

lines, 50 improved populations, 400 germplasm accessions, and 40 commercial hybrids of pearl millet<br />

quantified, and at least three lines and three populations with high levels of Fe (65-75 ppm) and Zn (45-55<br />

ppm) identified (2009)<br />

Activity 5C1.1: Evaluation of germplasm, breeding lines and improved populations for grain Fe and Zn<br />

contents<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.1: Variability for Fe and Zn in designated hybrid parents, population progenies and improved<br />

populations developed in Asia and African region quantified (KNR/SKG/KLS, 2007)<br />

Earlier studies, based on the analyses of selfed grain samples, had shown large variability both for Fe and Zn<br />

content. A study conducted during the 2009 rainy season (see 5C.2.1.1) had shown that reduction in seed set<br />

under selfing can lead to variable overestimates of both Fe and Zn content, the extent of overestimate depending<br />

on the extent of reduction in seed set and the genotype. Thus, hybrid parents, population progenies, germplasm<br />

accessions, OPVs, and hybrids previously found for high Fe and/or Zn content were re-evaluated during the<br />

<strong>2010</strong> and analyzed for Fe and Zn content using open–pollinated grain samples and an XRF (X-ray Fluorescence<br />

Spectrometer) screening technique.<br />

Designated seed parents<br />

Seventy B-lines (counterparts of the designated A-lines), which included those previously identified for high Fe<br />

content (based on selfed grain samples) and new B-lines were evaluated in a 2-replication trial during the <strong>2010</strong><br />

rainy season at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and partners locations. Based on the mean performance at 5 locations, large<br />

variability both for Fe content (26-81ppm) and Zn content (27-44 ppm) was observed among these lines. ICMB<br />

06444 had the highest Fe content (81 ppm). This B-line is a direct selection from an Extra-early B-composite<br />

(EEBC), which flowered in 46 days. However, this line had only 36 ppm Zn content. Eighteen other lines had<br />

>60 ppm Fe and 36-44 ppm Zn content.<br />

Potential restorer lines<br />

Four sets of hybrids were tested in the initial hybrid trials (IHTs) during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and at partners test locations<br />

in India. This included IHT-1 and IHT-2 tested in peninsular India; and IHT-3 and IHT-4 tested in northern India. Pollen parents of<br />

IHT-1 and IHT-2 were tested in 2-replication trials in hybrid parental trial-1 and those of IHT-3 and IHT-4 in hybrid parental trial-2.<br />

ICTP 8203 and ICMB 88004 were used as high-Fe controls in both trials. XRF analysis of grain samples of 40 parental lines produced<br />

at Patancheru showed a wide range both for Fe (33-94 ppm) and Zn content (24-56) in the hybrid parental trial-1. High iron controls<br />

ICTP 8203 and ICMB 88004 had 55 and 57 ppm Fe, respectively. Twenty-nine lines exceeded the Fe level of ICMB 88004, and 16<br />

of these had >70 ppm Fe (almost all these having >40 ppm Zn). In 28 lines of the hybrid parental trial-2, Fe content varied from 30 to 84<br />

ppm and Zn content varied from 30 to 66 ppm with ICTP 8203 having 79 ppm Fe and ICMB 88004 having 56 ppm Fe content.<br />

Fourteen lines in this trial exceeded the Fe level of ICMB 88004, with five of these having >70 ppm Fe, and four of these having 42-66<br />

ppm Zn content.<br />

Similar to the IHTs, four testcross trials (TXTs) were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and<br />

partners locations TXT-1 and TXT-2 in peninsular India, and TXT-3 and TXT-4 in northern India. Pollen<br />

parents of these hybrids were evaluated in 2-replication at Patancheru in the corresponding parental trials in the<br />

respective regions. ICTP 8203 and ICMB 88004 were used as high-Fe controls in all four trials. TXT parental<br />

trial-1 consisted of 58 lines. The Fe content among these lines varied from 34 to 102 ppm and Zn content from<br />

27 to 61 ppm. The duplicate plots of ICTP 8203 had 67 and 72 ppm Fe, while the duplicate plots of ICMB<br />

88004 had 48 and 50 ppm Fe. Thirty nine lines had >50 ppm Fe. Of these, 13 lines had >70 ppm Fe and all but<br />

one had >50 ppm Zn content. The testcross parental trial-2 had 59 entries in which the Fe content varied from<br />

37 to 91 ppm and Zn content varied from 29 to 66 ppm. ICTP 8203 had 74 ppm Fe and 53 ppm Zn, while<br />

ICMB 88004 had 45 ppm Fe and 38 ppm Zn content. Forty three lines had > 50 ppm Fe. Of these, 16 lines had<br />

>70 ppm Fe content, of which 11 lines had >50 ppm Zn content. Testcross parental trial-3 consisted of 50 lines.<br />

The Fe content in these lines varied from 30 to 112 ppm and Zn content from 28 to 68 ppm (61 ppm Fe in<br />

ICMB 88004 and 68 ppm Fe in ICTP 8203). Twenty one lines in this trial had >50 ppm Fe content. Of these, 8<br />

lines had >70 ppm Fe and 45-62 ppm Zn content (46 ppm in ICTP 8203 and 48 ppm in ICMB 88004).<br />

Testcross parental trial-4 consisted of 39 lines. The Fe content in these lines varied from 27 to 102 ppm and Zn<br />

content from 24 to 72 ppm. Twenty-five lines in this trial had >50 ppm Fe content. The two duplicate plots of<br />

ICTP 8203 had 62 and 73 ppm Fe, while the two duplicate plots of ICMB 88004 had 57-58 ppm Fe content.<br />

242


Thirteen lines had >70 ppm Fe and 44-60 ppm Zn content (45-50 ppm Zn in ICTP 8203 and 41-42 ppm Zn in<br />

ICMB 88004).<br />

Advanced breeding lines of pearl millet<br />

Large variability for various traits exists among advanced breeding lines that are bred for eventual use in hybrid<br />

parents development. These are systematically screened to identify those with high Fe and Zn content in elite<br />

genetic backgrounds. We selected 682 seed parents progenies from breeding blocks in 2009. These were<br />

evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Based on agronomic score and open-pollinated seed set, 562 progenies<br />

were selected for Fe and Zn analysis. The Fe content in these progenies varied from 11 to 123 ppm. Fifty-two<br />

progenies had >80 ppm Fe, of which 35 progenies had >90 ppm (>50 ppm Zn in 30 progenies). Similarly, 1014<br />

restorer progenies were selected from breeding blocks in 2009, which were evaluated during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy<br />

season. Based on agronomic score and open-pollinated seed set, 783 progenies were selected for Fe and Zn<br />

analysis. The Fe content in these progenies varied from 19 to 156 ppm. Forty-six progenies had >90 ppm Fe, of<br />

which 30 progenies had even >100 ppm Fe (>60 ppm Zn in 26 progenies). In seed parents as well as restorer<br />

parents program, progenies at F 5 /F 6 stage and onwards are advanced and maintained by bulk pedigree breeding,<br />

and the most promising ones are grouped into various trait-specific nurseries. Thus, some of most promising<br />

ones with multiple traits get grouped into more than one nurseries, where they all are advanced by bulk pedigree<br />

method. Since these progenies were drawn from various trait-specific nurseries and from two seasons, we have<br />

yet to analyze their pedigree relationships.<br />

Population progenies<br />

S 1 to S 4 progenies from seven populations earlier identified for high Fe content based on selfed grain samples<br />

were re-evaluated for visually assessed D agronomic performance and Fe and Zn content in un-replicated<br />

nurseries at Patancheru during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. The late planting of these nurseries affected the seed set.<br />

Since seed set has been found to overestimate both Fe and Zn content, seed set of open-pollinated panicles was<br />

recorded lines showing below average seed set were rejected, and hence not analyzed for Fe and Zn content.<br />

More than 190 S 2 -S 4 progenies of ICTP 8203 (the highest-Fe OPV identified so far) were evaluated, of which<br />

160 were selected based on agronomic performance and seed set. Analysis of these 160 progenies identified 87<br />

progenies that had 60-147 ppm Fe and 46-96 ppm Zn content (73 Fe and 62 Zn in ICTP 8203; 72 Fe and 57 Zn<br />

in ICMB 88004). Twenty three lines had >100 ppm Fe and 59-96 ppm Zn content. Out of 97 S 1 progenies of<br />

ICMV 221 (another high-Fe OPV), 86 were selected based on agronomic score, and seed set. These had 31-143<br />

ppm Fe and 36-82 ppm Zn content (ICTP 8203 had 77-98 ppm Fe and 69-70 ppm Zn, while ICMB 88004 had<br />

56-87 ppm Fe and 51-53 ppm Zn). Of these, 19 progenies had >90 ppm Fe (>100 ppm in 8 progenies) and 60-<br />

82 ppm Zn content. In AIMP 92901 (a moderately high-Fe OPV), 104 S 1 progenies were evaluated, of which<br />

96 were selected based on agronomic performances and seed set. The Fe content in these progenies varied from<br />

40 to 104 ppm and Zn content from 41 to 79 ppm. (68-75 ppm Fe and 54-70 ppm Zn in ICTP 8203; and 72-94<br />

ppm Fe and 62 ppm Zn in ICMB 88004). Twenty seven progenies had >75 ppm Fe, of which 8 lines had > 90<br />

ppm Fe and 57-79 ppm Zn content.<br />

ICMR 312 is a high-yielding population pollen parent of a high-yielding top cross hybrid (ICMH 312). We<br />

evaluated 108 S 1 progenies from this population and all were analyzed for Fe and Zn content. The Fe content in<br />

these progenies varied from 34 to 96 ppm and Zn content from 35 to 69 ppm (83-85 ppm Fe and 54-64 ppm Zn<br />

in ICTP 8203; and 60-63 ppm Fe and 52-55 ppm Zn in ICMB 88004). Twenty two progenies had >75 ppm Fe,<br />

of which 8 progenies had 85-96 ppm Fe and 50-69 ppm Zn content.<br />

Bold-seeded early composite (BSEC) is the parental source population from which ICMV 221 was developed.<br />

So we explored the variability within BSEC. From an evaluation of 55 S 1 progenies of this composite, 53<br />

progenies were analyzed that showed 37-93 ppm Fe and 36-75 ppm Zn content (73 ppm Fe and 65 ppm Zn in<br />

ICTP 8203; and 65 ppm Fe and 49 ppm Zn in ICMB 88004). Nineteen progenies had >70 ppm Fe, of which 7<br />

progenies had >80 ppm Fe and 57-74 ppm Zn content.<br />

S 2 /S 3 progenies in two populations (CGP and GGP) introduced from WCA were also evaluated for withinpopulation<br />

variability for Fe and Zn content. We evaluated 61 progenies of CGP, of which 47 were selected and<br />

analyzed for Fe and Zn content. The Fe content in these progenies varied from 48 to 102 ppm and Zn content<br />

from 38 to 87 ppm (98 ppm Fe and 59 ppm Zn in ICTP 8203; and 83 ppm Fe and 50 Zn in ICMB 88004).<br />

Thirty eight progenies had >60 ppm Fe, of which 14 progenies had >80 ppm and 57-87 ppm Zn content. In<br />

GGP, we evaluated 49 progenies and selected 33 progenies which had 43-130 ppm and 32-92 ppm Zn content<br />

(101 ppm Fe and 63 Zn in ICTP 8203; and 83 ppm Fe and 50 ppm Zn in ICMB 88004). Sixteen progenies had<br />

>85 ppm Fe and 54-92 ppm Zn content.<br />

243


F 3 /F 4 progenies derived from high Fe B x B crosses<br />

Development of high-yielding and high-Fe hybrids depends on the availability of high-yielding and high-Fe<br />

parental lines, which must be bred by planned crossing program, as for any other trait. We evaluated more than<br />

440 F 3 progenies derived from 8 F 2 populations, and more than 320 F 4 progenies derived from six<br />

F 2 2populations. Based on agronomic performance during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 155 F 3 progenies were selected<br />

in which the Fe content varied from 37 to 115 ppm. Of these, 23 progenies had >75 ppm Fe content, of which<br />

17 progenies had 55-72 ppm Zn content. In the 7 control plots of ICMB 88004 (a high-Fe designated B-line),<br />

the Fe content varied from 60 to 67 ppm (83 ppm in one plot) and zinc content in these 8 plots varied from 52 to<br />

60 ppm. In the F 4 progenies, Fe content varied from 39 to 124 ppm. Of these, 97 progenies had >75 ppm Fe<br />

content, of which 74 progenies had 55-96 ppm Zn content (>65 ppm Zn in 18 progenies). The Fe content in<br />

ICMB 88004 in this progeny block varied from 61-77 ppm and Zn content from 54 to 66 ppm.<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta and KL Sahrawat<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.2: Variability for Fe and Zn in iniari germplasm, core collection and commercial hybrids<br />

assessed (KNR/SKG/HDU/KLS,2008)<br />

Iniari accessions<br />

Earlier studies in 2009, based on the analysis of selfed grain samples of 202 iniari accessions, had shown this<br />

germplasm as the most promising source of Fe content. Since reduced seed set leads to variable overestimates<br />

of Fe and Zn content, we discarded those accessions with low Fe content and re-evaluated 193 selected<br />

accessions during the <strong>2010</strong> post rainy and rainy season in 2-replication trials at Patancheru to validate the results<br />

using open-pollinated grain samples. The grain samples from these trials are yet to be analyzed. However,<br />

based on the data from selfed grain samples in 2009, 110 high-Fe accessions had also been planted in a high-Fe<br />

block during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. XRF analysis of open-pollinated grain samples of 87 accessions selected on<br />

the basis of agronomic score and seed set from this nursery showed a wide range, both for Fe (41-141 ppm) and<br />

Zn content (36-87 ppm). Nineteen accessions had >100 ppm Fe and all but one of these had 63-84 ppm Zn<br />

content. An accession (IP 17672) that had been identified for high-Fe content in 2009 trials had 101 ppm and<br />

64 ppm Zn in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season trial as well. It was examined for within-population variability. Evaluation of<br />

47 S 1 progenies from this accession in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season showed Fe ranging from 70 to 114 ppm and Zn<br />

ranging from 51 to 74 ppm.<br />

Core Collection<br />

Core collection evaluation provides a systematic and cost-effective practical approach for wider search of<br />

germplasm to identify diverse sources of any trait. Thus, pearl millet core collection, consisting of 504<br />

accessions was evaluated during the 2009 post rainy season. Of these, 428 accessions flowered in time to<br />

permit production of selfed grain samples. These were analyzed in <strong>2010</strong>. Results showed large variation both<br />

for Fe (22-185 ppm) and Zn content (19-116 ppm). Forty one accessions had >100 ppm Fe and 71-116 ppm Zn<br />

content. However, since these are estimated from selfed grain samples, we selected 216 accessions with >70<br />

ppm Fe content which will be further evaluated for Fe/Zn analysis using open-pollinated grain samples.<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta, HD Upadhyaya and KL Sahrawat<br />

High-iron pearl millet hybrids<br />

Three-pronged approaches are being followed to identify/develop high-yielding and high-iron hybrids in pearl<br />

millet. The first approach is to identify high-iron hybrids from amongst those already under cultivation or in the<br />

pipeline. The second approach is to systematically screen hybrids in the advanced hybrid trials of the All India<br />

Coordinated Pearl Millet Improvement Project (AICPMIP), which will have already passed two years of yield<br />

test in multilocational trials. The third approach is to develop high-yielding and high-iron hybrids using existing<br />

parental lines found to be having high iron content. Development of high-iron parental lines for high-yielding<br />

and high-iron hybrid development is a long-term vision of pearl millet biofortification program.<br />

Commercial hybrids: Ninety-two commercial and pipeline hybrids, both from public and private sector, had<br />

been evaluated at Patancheru during the 2009 rainy season. Based on the analysis of selfed grain samples, 38<br />

high-iron hybrids had been selected and re-evaluated at 16 locations. We received good grain samples only from<br />

6 locations. The Fe content in these hybrids for Patancheru grain sample varied from 35 to 58 Fe with the<br />

control hybrid KH 302 being the highest-Fe hybrid (67 ppm Fe in ICTP 8203). The corresponding ICP Fe<br />

values for KH 302 and ICTP 8203 were 53 ppm and 63 ppm, respectively. The Zn content in these hybrids<br />

varied from 31 ppm to 45 ppm (44 ppm in KH 302 and 40 ppm in ICTP 8203). Based on Patancheru results, 12<br />

hybrids with high Fe were analyzed for grain samples from 4 out-locations for which good grain samples had<br />

been received. The trial mean of these hybrids, based on XRF analysis, varied from 50 ppm Fe at Patancheru to<br />

244


76 ppm Fe at Paithan in Maharashtra. Based on the average performance across all the five locations, the Fe<br />

content among these hybrids varied from 50 to 75 ppm (63 ppm in control KH 302 and 74 ppm in ICTP 8203).<br />

AICPMIP’s advanced hybrid trials: While the targeted development of high-iron hybrids in high-yielding<br />

background based on the utilization of high-iron hybrid parents has been initiated, routine screening of hybrids<br />

in the advanced trials of the All India Coordinated Pearl Millet Improvement Project (AICPMIP) has also been<br />

undertaken with the objective of (1) assessing the magnitude of variability for Fe and Zn in those hybrids, and<br />

(2) identification of high-Fe hybrids in high-yield background for possible release as biofortified hybrids. Thus,<br />

grain samples of 16 hybrids each from a medium duration trial (10 locations) and a long-duration trial (9<br />

locations) grown in peninsular India were produced and supplied by the AICPMIP centers. Similarly, grain<br />

samples of 21 hybrids each from a medium-duration trial (10 locations) and a long-duration trial (8 locations)<br />

grown in northern India were also produced and supplied by the AICPMIP centers. These are yet to be analyzed<br />

for Fe and Zn content.<br />

Initial hybrid trials: The first phase of producing high-yielding and high-Fe hybrids involves the use of<br />

available high-Fe seed parents and potential restorers to demonstrate that high-Fe hybrids can be produced<br />

without compromising on grain yield. Four multi-locational hybrid trials that consisted of hybrids selected on<br />

the basis of visually assessed multi-location performance in 2009 testcross trials and grain Fe content of their<br />

parental lines were re-evaluated for grain yield, agronomic performance and Fe and Zn content in multilocational<br />

trials (including Patancheru) during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. Open- pollinated grain samples were used<br />

for Fe/Zn analysis.<br />

Initial hybrid trial-1, consisting of 36 test hybrids and four controls (KH 302 and MRB 2210 as high-Fe hybrids,<br />

ICTP 8203 as high-Fe OPV, and 86M52 as high-yielding hybrid) was sent out to 10 locations in peninsular<br />

India. Reliable grain yield data could be generated at 5 locations. The mean grain yield of hybrids varied from<br />

1860 kg ha -1 to 3970 kg ha -1 . Based on the XRF analysis of grain samples from Patancheru, the Fe content in<br />

these hybrids varied from 38 to 82 ppm. Fourteen hybrids that were selected based on agronomic scores, mean<br />

grain yield and mean Fe content across the locations had 2510-3970 kg ha -1 grain yield, and 53-72 ppm Fe<br />

content. In comparison, 86M52 had 3790 kg ha -1 grain yield and 41 ppm Fe, while KH 302 and MRB 2210<br />

had respectively, 2980 kg ha -1 , 3150 kg ha -1 grain yield, and 56 ppm and 62 ppm Fe (ICTP 8203 had 2420 kg<br />

ha -1 grain yield and 72 ppm Fe content). This trial identified experimental hybrids that had grain yield<br />

comparable to 86M52 and higher Fe content. It also identified hybrids that were comparable to MRB 2210 both<br />

for grain yield and Fe content. Based on the analysis of all 36 hybrids in the trial, grain yield at Patancheru was<br />

not significantly correlated either with Fe content (r=-0.15) or Zn content (r=0.20) (note that Fe data for all<br />

hybrids were available only for Patancheru grain samples).<br />

Initial hybrid trial-2, consisting of 36 test hybrids and the same four controls as in trial-1 above, was conducted<br />

at Patancheru and 10 partners’ locations in peninsular India. Reliable grain yield data could be generated at 7<br />

locations (in addition to Patancheru). Based on the mean performance across the locations, 18 hybrids were<br />

identified that had 3130-5020 kg ha -1 grain yield and 49-74 ppm Fe content. 86M52 had 4880 kg ha -1 grain yield<br />

and 42 ppm Fe content. KH 302 and MRB 2210 had 4000-4160 kg ha -1 grain yield, and 61 ppm and 48 ppm Fe<br />

content, respectively (ICTP 8203 had 2820 kg ha -1 grain yield and 71 ppm Fe content). Results of this trial also<br />

showed that hybrids comparable to 86M52 for grain yield but with higher Fe content or comparable to KH 302<br />

and MRB 2210 for Fe content but with higher grain yield could be produced. Based on the analysis of all 40<br />

hybrids in the trial, grain yield at Patancheru was not significantly correlated either with Fe content (r=-0.04) or<br />

Zn content (r=-0.13) (note that Fe data for all hybrids were available only for Patancheru grain samples).<br />

Initial hybrid trial-3, consisting of 26 test hybrids and four controls (86M54 and 9444 as high-yield controls; and<br />

KH 302 and ICTP 8203 a high-Fe controls) was conducted at Patancheru and sent out to 12 locations in northern<br />

India. Reliable grain yield data could be generated at 6 locations. Based on the mean grain yield, agronomic<br />

score and Fe content, 11 hybrids were identified in which grain yield varied from 2200 to 2860 kg ha -1 and Fe<br />

content from 42 to 61 ppm. Hybrids 86M54 and 9444, respectively, had 2780 kg ha -1 and 3310 kg ha -1 grain<br />

yield, and 48 ppm and 36 ppm Fe content. KH 302 had 2420 kg ha -1 grain yield and 50 ppm Fe, while ICTP<br />

8203 had 2070 kg ha -1 grain yield 59 ppm Fe content. Thus, hybrids having 86% of the grain yield of the<br />

highest-yielding control 9444, but 44% higher Fe could be produced. However, several hybrids having Fe<br />

content comparable to KH 302, but 14-16% higher grain yield were also identified. Based on the analysis of all<br />

26 hybrids in the trial, grain yield at Patancheru was significantly and negatively correlated both with Fe content (r=-0.74 ** ) and<br />

Zn content (r=-60 ** ) (note that Fe data for all hybrids were available only for Patancheru grain samples).<br />

245


Initial hybrid trial-4, consisting of 26 test hybrids and the four controls as in trial-3, was conducted at<br />

Patancheru and sent out to 8 locations in northern India. Reliable grain yield data could be generated at 5<br />

locations. Based on the mean grain yield, agronomic score and Fe content, 13 hybrids were selected that had<br />

1630-4200 kg ha -1 grain yield and 38-71 ppm Fe content. Hybrids 86M54 and 9444, respectively, had 3260 kg<br />

ha -1 and 4510 kg ha -1 grain yield, and 42 ppm and 38 ppm Fe content, while KH 302 had 3110 kg ha -1 grain<br />

yield and 54 ppm Fe content (ICTP 8203 had 2480 kg ha -1 grain yield 63 ppm Fe content). A hybrid with 94%<br />

grain yield that of 9444 but with 20% higher Fe content was identified. Hybrids with yield comparable but<br />

higher Fe content, or Fe comparable but higher grain yield than KH 302 were also identified. Based on the<br />

analysis of all 26 hybrids in the trial, grain yield at Patancheru was not significantly correlated either with Fe<br />

content (r=-0.36) or Zn content (r=-0.24) (note that Fe data for all hybrids were available only for Patancheru<br />

grain samples).<br />

Testcross trials: In an effort to develop high-yielding and high-iron hybrids, production and evaluation of new<br />

testcrosses adapted to peninsular and northern India continued. Two testcross trials (TXT-1 and TXT-2) for<br />

peninsular India, and two testcross trials (TXT-3 and TXT-4) for northern India were constituted, and each was<br />

evaluated at Patancheru as well as at least at three locations in the target regions. All four trials were planted in<br />

single-row plots, replicated twice and visually evaluated for yield potential and agronomic traits. Openpollinated<br />

grain samples were collected for Fe/Zn analysis.<br />

TXT-1 consisted of 106 test hybrids of which 30 were selected based on across-location agronomic score, and<br />

Fe value in grain samples from Patancheru for further evaluation. The Fe content in these selected hybrids<br />

(based on Patancheru grain samples) varied from 42 to 76 ppm ( 48 and 55 ppm in duplicate plots of KH 302<br />

and 60 and 66 ppm in duplicate plots of ICTP 8203). The Zn content in these hybrids varied from 31 to 49 ppm<br />

(39-43 ppm in KH 302 and 42-47 ppm in ICTP 8203). TXT-2 consisted of 108 test hybrids, of which 26 were<br />

selected based on multi-locational performance and Fe content from Patancheru samples. The Fe content in<br />

these selected hybrids varied from 42 to 75 ppm (49 and 51 ppm in KH 302, and 59 and 70 ppm in ICTP 8203).<br />

The Zn content in these selected hybrids varied from 35 to 48 ppm (38 and 43 ppm in KH 302, and 42 and 50<br />

ppm in ICTP 8203).<br />

TXT-3 consisted of 94 test hybrids, of which 20 were selected based on multi-locational agronomic<br />

performance and Fe content from Patancheru grain samples. The Fe content in these selected hybrids varied<br />

from 44 to 76 ppm (53 and 57 ppm in KH 302, and 62 and 68 ppm in ICTP 8203). The Zn content in these<br />

hybrids varied from 37 to 53 ppm (44 ppm in KH 302, and 46 and 51 ppm in ICTP 8203). TXT-4 consisted of<br />

108 test hybrids, of which 22 were selected based on multilocation performance and Fe content in Patancheru<br />

grain samples. The Fe content in these selected hybrids varied from 50 to 73 ppm (47 and 61 ppm in KH 302,<br />

and 61 and 63 ppm in ICTP 8203). The Zn content in these hybrids varied from 38 to 54 ppm (44 and 44 ppm in<br />

KH 302, and 45 and 46 ppm in ICTP 8203).<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta and KL Sahrawat<br />

Milestone 5C.1.1.3: G×E interaction for Fe and Zn assessed and lines stable for >70 ppm Fe and >50 ppm Zn<br />

identified (KNR/SKG/KLS, 2009)<br />

Two sets of multilocational trials were conducted during the rainy season of 2006-2009 to assess G x E<br />

interaction and stability of lines for Fe and Zn content. Set I trial, consisting of 30 entries (mostly inbred lines),<br />

was conducted at 6 locations in 2006 and at 8 locations in 2009. These have been analyzed for Fe and Zn<br />

content. Set II trial, consisting of 20 OPVs, was conducted at 8 locations in 2008 and at 6 locations in 2009. The<br />

2008 grain samples have been analyzed for Fe and Zn content. The 2009 grain samples are yet to be analyzed.<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta and KL Sahrawat<br />

Output target 5C.2: Information on genetics and recurrent selection efficiency for grain Fe and Zn<br />

available (2009)<br />

Activity 5C2.1: Conduct genetical studies and recurrent selection for grain Fe and Zn contents and develop<br />

mapping populations<br />

Milestone 5C.2.1.1: Inheritance of Fe and Zn and relationship between the parental lines and hybrids for these<br />

traits determined (KNR/SKG/KLS, 2009)<br />

246


Genetics of Fe and Zn content in pearl millet<br />

An earlier diallel study had shown that both Fe and Zn content in pearl millet are predominantly under additive<br />

genetic control with no better-parent heterosis, implying that the breeding of high-Fe/Zn hybrid will require both<br />

parental line having higher Fe/Zn content. This subject has since been further pursued to develop an in-depth<br />

understanding of the genetics of Fe and Zn content. First set of Line x Testes trial involving hybrids between 8<br />

lines and 7 testers was conducted during the rainy and post rainy season of 2009 and grain samples were<br />

analyzed in <strong>2010</strong>. Results showed that while the main effects due to lines as well as testers were highly<br />

significant in both seasons for both micronutrients, Line x Tester effect was significant for Fe only in the rainy<br />

season and for Zn only in the post rainy season. Further, where Line x Tester effect was significant, it<br />

accounted for much smaller proportion of the genetic variation as compared to the main effects due to lines and<br />

testers, with the predictability ratio being very high (0.77 for Fe in the rainy season, and 0.90 for Zn in the post<br />

rainy season). There was not a single instance of hybrids exceeding the Fe or Zn levels of their better-parents<br />

(i.e. no better-parent heterosis). This confirmed the earlier results based on diallel study that Fe and Zn content<br />

in pearl millet are predominantly under additive genetic control. A second Line x Tester study involving<br />

hybrids of 16 lines and 12 testers was conducted to pursue this subject further. Grain samples produced from<br />

this trial conducted during the 2009 rainy and <strong>2010</strong> post rainy season are yet to be analyzed for Fe and Zn<br />

content.<br />

Inbreeding depression<br />

Three diverse populations [Extra-early B-composite (EEBC), Smut-resistant B-composite (SRBC) and High<br />

head volume B-composite (HHVBC)] were each advanced to four generations of inbreeding using single-seed<br />

descent, and their selfed bulks (S 1 -S4 4 ) were produced. These were compared with their original composite<br />

bulks (Co) under terminal drought as well as under irrigated control during the post rainy season <strong>2010</strong> in 4-row<br />

plots, replicated three times in a split-plot design, with the composites as main plots and their different bulks as<br />

sub-plots. Detailed analyses of the data are yet to be carried out. There was no consistent pattern of change<br />

across the selfing generations in EEBC and SRBC, except for HHVBC in which the Fe content increased in all<br />

the selfed bulks (up to 23% in the S 2 bulk). This would tend to indicate dominance (partial?) of low-iron alleles<br />

over the high iron alleles, and supports the previous results from the diallel and Line x Tester studies. Results<br />

showed no consistent patterns with respect to drought effect. For instance, as compared to the control, the Fe<br />

content under drought increased from 11 to 30% in various selfed bulks of EEBC, and from 16 to 24 % in<br />

various selfed bulks of HHVBC, while in SRBC it increased up to 41% to two bulks and was up to 9% less in<br />

the other two bulks.<br />

Single plant selection efficiency for Fe and Zn content in pearl millet<br />

Single plant selection for yielding ability and other agronomic traits in segregating populations is a standard<br />

breeding procedure. Effectiveness of this procedure to select for grain Fe and Zn content in pearl millet has not<br />

been tested. We initiated a series of experiments to address this issues by comparing the Fe and Zn content of<br />

seed produced from individual S 0 plants and those produced from the trial of their S 1 progenies in four diverse<br />

OPVs (ICTP 8203, JBV 3, AIMP 92901 and ICMR 312). More than 60 random plants were selfed in each of the<br />

two populations (ICTP 8203 and JBV 3) during the 2008 rainy season). Based on seed set, 40 selfed panicles<br />

that could provide enough seed for a 2-replication trial for two seasons were harvested and threshed to produce<br />

S 1 seed. The S 1 progenies of both populations were planted as two separate experiments during the 2009 post<br />

rainy and rainy season in single row plots of 2 meter, replicated two times. Analysis of selfed seed samples from<br />

individual plants (So plants) and from the S 1 progenies from post rainy season trial were analyzed for Fe and Zn<br />

following ICP method. Results showed highly significant correlation between the So plants and S 1 progenies for<br />

Fe (r= 0.69 ** for ICTP 8203; and 0.54 ** for JBV 3) and for Zn content (r=0.69 ** for ICTP 8203; and 0.64 ** for<br />

JBV 3), indicating that low-Fe and low-Zn plants can be effectively discarded, thus saving on resources for<br />

progeny testing. Grain samples of these trials from the rainy season are yet to be analyzed. A similar<br />

experiment with two additional populations (AIMP 92901 and ICMR 312) was conducted during the rainy<br />

season 2009 and post rainy season <strong>2010</strong>. The grain samples of these two trials are also yet to be analyzed.<br />

Dwarfing gene effect on Fe and Zn content in pearl millet<br />

Nine pairs of tall and d 2 dwarf near-isogenic lines were evaluated for Fe and Zn content under terminal drought<br />

and irrigated control during the <strong>2010</strong> post rainy season at Patancheru. These lines were planted in single-row<br />

plots of 4m, replicated three times in a split- plot design, with the 9 genetic backgrounds of lines as main plots<br />

and tall-dwarf pairs as sub-plots. In all but one pair the Fe content in dwarf versions was 5 to 35% less than in<br />

the tall versions under irrigated control, with large variation observed across the pairs: in one pair, it was 9%<br />

more. Under terminal drought, the Fe content in dwarf versions was 3 to 33% less than in the tall versions in 7<br />

pairs and 4 to 12% more in two pairs. Under drought, the Fe content was higher than the control in most of the<br />

247


lines (both tall and dwarf versions). This increase in the Fe content under drought could have resulted from<br />

reduced seed size and/or reduced seed set, which are under investigation.<br />

Effect of seed set on grain Fe and Zn content in pearl millet<br />

Genetic identity of a pearl millet genotype in its grain samples can be preserved by producing the grains either<br />

by selfing or by sibbing. Grain production by sibbing is a costly and time consuming operation, not practical for<br />

handling a large number of breeding lines. Depending on the genotype and the environment, selfing in pearl<br />

millet can lead to variable reduction in seed set, which may affect grain micronutrients. Thus, an experiment<br />

was conducted during the 2009 rainy season to address this issue. Fifteen inbred lines (8 B-lines and 7 R-lines)<br />

with a wide range of Fe and Zn content were planted in 2-row plots, replicated three times in an RCBD during<br />

the 2009 rainy season and <strong>2010</strong> post rainy season. About 50-60 plants in each plot were bagged with parchment<br />

paper bag at the panicle emergence stage. At full stigma emergence stage, the paper bags were repeatedly<br />

moved up and down 2-3 times to achieve about 40-50% stigma damage (and hence about 50% seed set) in 10-15<br />

panicles. In another 20-25 panicles, the paper bags were moved up and down 5-6 times to achieve 80-90%<br />

stigma damage (and hence about 20% seed set). Other bagged panicles were left untouched to achieve<br />

maximum seed set. At harvest, bagged panicles were classified into three categories (80-100% seed set, as good<br />

seed set; 40-50% seed set as average seed set; and 10-20% seed set as poor seed set). Panicles not falling into<br />

these three distinct seed set categories were discarded. All the panicles in a seed set class were bulk threshed and<br />

subjected to ICP analysis of grain Fe and Zinc contents. Results from the 2009 rainy season trial showed that Fe<br />

content in good seed set class varied from 52 to 103 ppm among these lines. In the average seed set class, Fe<br />

was overestimated in all the lines, ranging from 7 to 31%. In poor seed set class, the Fe overestimation ranged<br />

from 15 to 62%. Although the magnitude varied, depending on the genotype, the general trend of reduction in<br />

seed set leading to overestimation of micronutrients was consistent for Fe content in the rainy season and for Zn<br />

content in both seasons. This showed that variable reduction in seed set arising from selfing leads to variable<br />

overestimation of both Fe and Zn, and hence selfed grain samples cannot be used reliably for Fe and Zn<br />

estimation.<br />

Open-pollinated grain samples for Fe and Zn content analysis<br />

Since selfed seed cannot be reliably used for Fe and Zn analysis, and use of sibbed seed is not a practical<br />

proposition. Thus, two issues need to be resolved before resorting to the use of open-pollinated grains. First,<br />

whether pollen source from other genotypes can affect these micronutrients, and second, whether openpollinated<br />

grains will be prone to dust contamination.<br />

Pollen affect on grain Fe and Zn content: In an experiment conducted during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, we used<br />

two pairs each of hybrids, OPVs and inbred lines with the entries within each pair having large contrasts for Fe<br />

and Zn content. The experiment was planted in 4-row plots of 4m, replicated three times in a split-plot design,<br />

with the six pairs making the main plots and the entries within a pair making the sub-plots. In OPVs, 10-15<br />

panicles of each entry of a pair were sibbed as well as crossed reciprocally, while in hybrids and inbred lines 6-8<br />

plants in each entry of a pair were sibbed as well as crossed reciprocally. The sibbed and crossed panicles were<br />

harvested separately and bulk threshed. ICP analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the Fe<br />

values of sibbed and crossed grain samples for any entry (whether high-Fe entry was crossed with low-Fe entry<br />

or vice-versa). The difference between the sibbed seed and crossed seed in high-Fe entries varied from 6 to 5<br />

ppm, while in the low-Fe entries it varied from -1 to 7 ppm. For Zn content, the difference between the sibbed<br />

seed and crossed seed varied from -5 to 1 ppm in high-Zn parents, and from -2 to 3 ppm in low-Zn parents. This<br />

clearly showed pollen source had no effect on grain Fe and Zn content in pearl millet. This experiment will be<br />

repeated during the 2011 post rainy season.<br />

Dust contamination of open-pollinated pearl millet grains: As mentioned above, pollen source has no effect<br />

on Fe and Zn content in pearl millet. For effective use of open-pollinated grain samples for mineral analysis, the<br />

other issue requiring to be resolved is whether open-pollinated grains are prone to dust contamination. We<br />

evaluated 14 genotypes (4 OPVs, 6 hybrids, 4 B-lines) having 47-95 ppm Fe and 39-66 ppm Zn content to<br />

address this issue. Entries were planted in 4-row plots replicated three times during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season at<br />

Patancheru. Each plot was sibbed to produce dust-free grains from 10-15 sibbed panicles. Also, in each plot,<br />

10-15 panicles were bagged at the time anthesis was over, which will also produce dust-free grains. About 10-<br />

15 open-pollinated panicles were left unbagged till maturity, which would be exposed is potential dust<br />

contamination. The mean Fe content of the sibbed grains was 63 ppm, while for those from the open-pollinated<br />

bagged panicles it was 61 ppm, and for open-pollinated unbagged panicles it was 58 ppm. The difference<br />

between the open-pollinated bagged treatment and open-pollinated unbagged treatment varied mostly in the<br />

range of -8 to 8 ppm. The difference between the sibbed and open-pollinated bagged treatment was mostly in<br />

the range of -8 to 8 ppm, which confirms the results of the study mentioned above that pollen source has no<br />

248


effect on grain Fe content in pearl millet. This trend was consistent for Zn content as well, indicating that dust<br />

contamination is not an issue of any practical consequence regarding use of open-pollinated grains for Fe and Zn<br />

analysis.<br />

Correlation between ICP and XRF estimates for Fe and Zn content<br />

Inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (ICP) provides the most precise estimates of Fe and Zn content. The<br />

method, however, is slow (does about 200 samples a day), has substantial cost (US$ 15/sample), and uses<br />

ground materials, implying the grain samples used for analysis cannot be re-used for any purposes. The X-ray<br />

Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF), on the other hand, provides for rapid screening (>300 samples/day), is cost<br />

effective (US$ 0.98) in pearl millet. We conducted a<br />

comparative test on grain samples from nine trials (42-60 entries each). Very high correlations were found<br />

between the ICP and XRV values both for Fe (r=0.88 to 0.94 in 8 samples and 0.58 in 1 sample) and Zn content<br />

(r=0.88 to 0.95 in 8 samples and 0.56 in 1 sample). These results showed that XRF can be effectively used for<br />

large scale handling of breeding materials.<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta and KL Sahrawat<br />

Milestone 5C.2.1.2: Effectiveness of S 1 recurrent selection for Fe and Zn, and its effect on grain yield and other<br />

agronomic traits in four populations quantified (KNR/RB/KLS, 2012)<br />

Recurrent selection<br />

Even narrow-based populations (including improved OPVs) in pearl millet have been shown to have substantial<br />

variability for numerous traits, including grain Fe and Zn content. Research continued to test the effectiveness of<br />

recurrent selection to improve the Fe and Zn content in four populations. Of the four higher-Fe versions of a<br />

high-Fe variety (ICTP 8203) developed and tested in 2009, 2 found promising were re-evaluated along with the<br />

original ICTP 8203 in a multilocation trial during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season. This trial also included three additional<br />

higher-Fe versions developed in <strong>2010</strong> summer season. The trial was evaluated at 10 locations in peninsular India<br />

for grain yield and agronomic traits. Reliable field data and grain samples were received from 5 locations. The<br />

mean grain yield of these populations varied from 2230 kg ha -1 to 2600 kg ha -1 in the improved versions (2230<br />

kg ha -1 in the original C 0 bulk). The mean Fe content in these bulks varied from 75 ppm to 82 ppm (73 ppm in<br />

the C 0 bulk). The highest-yielding bulk with 11% higher yield also had 8% higher Fe content. Interestingly, this<br />

bulk had larger seed size (1000-grain weight of 17 g) compared to 15.4 g for the Co bulk.<br />

We tested the recurrent selection efficiency in three additional populations (ICMV 221, AIMP 92901 and ICMR<br />

312) using Fe content in the selfed seed samples as a selection criterion. In ICMV 221, 220 S 1 progenies<br />

selected from a previous evaluation in 2009 were analyzed for Fe content using ICP protocol. The Fe content in<br />

these progenies varied from 75 to 174 ppm, of which 10 progenies with 108-174 ppm were selected to constitute<br />

the C 1 bulk. In AIMP 92901, 300 S 1 progenies had been evaluated during the 2009 rainy season in which the Fe<br />

content varied from 38 to 117 ppm. Thirteen progenies with 74 to 117 ppm Fe were recombined to constitute C 1<br />

bulk of this population. In ICMR 312 also, 300 S 1 progenies had been evaluated in 2009. The Fe content in<br />

these progenies varied from 42 to 100 ppm, of which 17 progenies with 72-100 ppm were recombined to<br />

constitute the C 1 bulk of this population. Co and C 1 bulks of these three populations were evaluated at<br />

Patancheru in 4-row plots replicated three times. Grain yield, agronomic traits and Fe content (in openpollinated<br />

grain samples) were recorded. Results showed that as compared to the Co bulk, grain yield in the C 1<br />

bulk of ICMV 221 was 5% less and there was no change in Fe content. In AIMP 92901, grain yield in C 1 bulk<br />

was 3% less and Fe content 4% more (both changes practically of no significance) as compared to the Co bulk.<br />

In ICMR 312, the grain yield of the C 1 bulk was 11 % less and Fe content 17% more than the Co bulk. Lack of<br />

response to Fe selection in ICMV 221 and AIMP 92901 is being investigated.<br />

KN Rai, SK Gupta and KL Sahrawat<br />

Milestone 5C.2.1.3: QTL for high grain Fe and Zn identified based on F6 RIL mapping populations from two<br />

crosses (CTH/SS/KNR, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

249


MTP Project 6:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Producing more and better food at lower cost of stable open-pollinated<br />

cereals and legumes (sorghum, pigeonpea, chickpea and groundnut)<br />

through genetic improvement in the Asian SAT<br />

Pooran M Gaur<br />

Highlights for <strong>2010</strong><br />

Chickpea<br />

• Desi chickpea breeding lines with combined resistance to fusarium wilt, ascochyta blight and<br />

botrytis grey mould developed.<br />

• Wild relatives of chickpea showed high levels of antibiosis to the pod borer, H. armigera, and<br />

hence, there is a good possibility on diversifying the basis of resistance to pod borer by<br />

introgressing the resistance genes into the cultigen through wide hybridization.<br />

• Based on detached leaf bioassays for 11 transgenic events of chickpea carrying different cry<br />

genes, seven events with superior performance have been advanced to further generations for<br />

subsequent evaluations.<br />

• Breeding lines and land races with tolerance to high temperatures (up to 35 0 C) identified.<br />

Some of the earlier identified drought tolerant lines showed high temperature tolerance<br />

indicating that it is possible to develop cultivars with combined tolerance to terminal drought<br />

and heat stresses. The pod number per plant and the harvest index were identified as key traits<br />

that can be used in selections for heat tolerance.<br />

• The most critical component of terminal drought tolerance in chickpea was identified to be<br />

strategy of conservative water use during the early days of the cropping cycle, explained<br />

partly by a lower canopy conductance, which resulted in more water available in the soil<br />

profile during reproduction.<br />

• An intraspecific linkage map of chickpea was developed from ICCV 2 x JG 62 RILs. A total<br />

of 135 markers were mapped on to eight linkage groups spanning a distance of 310.2 cM.<br />

QTLs were identified for 11 different surrogate traits under saline and non-saline conditions in<br />

each of the two environments (2005–06 and 2007–08). QTLs were identified for both late and<br />

early phenology groups under saline and non-saline conditions. In the late phenology group, a<br />

QTL was found for seed yield under salinity on LG3 in 2007–08, explaining 19% of the<br />

variation. One QTL for shoot dry weight under salinity was found on LG1 in 2007–08,<br />

explaining 13% of the variation, and one QTL for seed number under salinity was found on<br />

LG7 in 2007–08, explaining 25% of the variation. When the phenotyping data were used for<br />

QTL analysis, disregarding the groups of phenology, no QTLs for seed yield was found in any<br />

of the treatments for either of the two years.<br />

• A major QTL for root traits was introgressed in three cultivars (JG 11 and KAK 2 from India<br />

and Chefe from Ethiopia) using marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC). BC 3 F 3 progenies were<br />

available for evaluation.<br />

Pigeonpea<br />

• Twelve entries (KPBR 80-2-4, ICPL’s 20094, 20097, 20098, 20099, <strong>2010</strong>0, <strong>2010</strong>3, 20115,<br />

20116, 20120, 20129 and 20134) showed resistance to FW and SMD at four locations<br />

(Badnapur, Bharuch, Gulbarga and <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru).<br />

• Genotypes (ICP 2933, ICP 5825, ICPHaRL 4985-10, ICPHaRL 4985-1, and LRG 41) showed<br />

stable resistance to pod borer, H. armigera and can be exploited in pigeonpea improvement<br />

programs.<br />

• Crossability studies indicated that C. acutifolius from secondary gene pool of pigeonpea and<br />

C. platycarpus, from tertiary gene pool, can be successfully utilized to introgress multiple pest<br />

and disease resistance.<br />

• Studies on mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa indicated that genotypes showing low<br />

oviposition and/or low larval numbers, and exhibiting low pod damage and good recovery<br />

resistance can be as source of resistance in pigeonpea breeding for Helicoverpa resistance.<br />

• The protease inhibitors (PIs) from the wild relatives showing potential as intibitors of HaGPs,<br />

could be considered as potential candidates for use in genetic transformation of crops for pest<br />

management, including H. armigera.<br />

250


• Based on the insect bioassays conducted with transgenic pigeonpea events in T1 and T2<br />

generations, 11 cry gene transgenic events of pigeonpea were identified promising and<br />

selected for strip trials under confined field conditions.<br />

• The carotenoids content was 10-25 fold higher in psyI transgenic events as compared to the<br />

untransformed controls. Two events with considerably higher β-carotene level (~5.5 μg/g)<br />

were selected and further studies on gene stability as well as biochemical profiling.<br />

Groundnut<br />

• Five groundnut varieties were released in three countries. Groundnut variety ICGV 96342 is<br />

released as BARI Chinabadam 9 in Bangladesh; ICGV 94301 is released as Sinpadetha 8 in<br />

Myanmar; and ICGV 93260 as R 2001-2, ICGV 87846 as Co 6, and ICGV 00350 in India.<br />

• Several events carrying PBNV N gene in antisense orientation (ASNP) showed little or no<br />

symptoms of the disease under the virus challenging assays in greenhouse conditions. These<br />

events have been advanced to further generations for subsequent phenotyping using<br />

mechanical as well as vector mediated transmission assays.<br />

• From elite trials, 12 (Spanish) and 6 (Virginia) lines for foliar disease resistance; 15 (Spanish)<br />

lines for medium duration; and 7 (Spanish) and 7 (Virginia) lines for drought tolerance were<br />

selected to include in International nursery trials<br />

• Through FPVS trials in India, Nepal and Vietnam nine farmer-preferred varieties (FPVs) of<br />

groundnut were identified which include ICGV 91114 and ICGS 76 in India; Rajarshi,<br />

Baideshi and B4 in Nepal; and L 14 and L 23, L26, D0401 in Vietnam<br />

• Several transgenic events carrying PBNVnp gene in antisense orientation (ASNP) showed<br />

very little or no symptoms of PBNV disease under the virus challenging assays in greenhouse<br />

conditions. These events have been advanced to further generations for subsequent<br />

phenotyping using mechanical as well as vector mediated transmission assays.<br />

• Ongoing work to understand the mechanisms of adaptation to water stress in groundnut shows<br />

that we need to go much beyond transpiration efficiency. We are starting to understand how<br />

certain pattern of water usage, in part related to canopy size, but may be also to canopy<br />

development and conductance, are explaining differences in pod yield.<br />

• Two transgenic events with rd29A:DREB1A consistently outperformed than the control and<br />

rest of the transgenic events under the imposed intermittent drought stress both under<br />

greenhouse and confined field conditions. These events showed better seed filling and a higher<br />

harvest index under intermittent drought stress conditions.<br />

• Transgenic groundnut events carrying phytoene synthase gene, psyI (controls the production<br />

of ß-carotene) from maize with the promotor from oleosin gene of Arabidopsis (for seedspecific<br />

expression in oil bodies) were evaluated. Level of total carotenoids was 10-25 fold<br />

increase in transgenic events as compared to the untransformed controls. Preliminary studies<br />

showed an enhanced β-carotene level (~5.5 μg/g) in two events. These events have been<br />

advanced further for gene stability as well as biochemical profiling.<br />

• Six F 3 and F 4 progenies derived from crosses between elite groundnut cultivars and new<br />

sources of amphidiploid groundnut (ISATGR 1212) were screened for A. flavus. All these<br />

progenies showed low A. flavus infection and five of these progenies produced low aflatoxin<br />

(0-6.7 ug/g). These results suggest that it is possible to transfer A. flavus resistance and low<br />

aflatoxin production from wild relatives of groundnut<br />

Sorghum<br />

• Five R-line progenies showed significantly superior grain yield (by 23 to 52%) ranging from<br />

2.3 to 2.9 t ha -1 over control CSV 4 and showed low PGMR score 3.2 to 3.6 indicating their<br />

resistance to grain mold.<br />

• Five hybrids (ICSA 52 × SPV 1411, ICSA 84 × E 36-1, ICSA 102 × E 36-1, ICSA 89002 × E<br />

36-1 and ICSA 24005 × E 36-1) appeared tolerant to charcoal rot with 1.2-1.4 inter node<br />

infection and ≤10% lodging.<br />

• Thirty R-lines were significantly (by 5 to 33%) superior to the control - RS 29 for grain Fe<br />

contents with grain Fe ranging from 30 to 39 ppm and significantly superior (by 6 and 62%)<br />

for grain Zn contents ranging from 18 to 28 ppm which can be evaluated in multilocation<br />

trials for assessing the stability of their performance.<br />

251


Output 6.1: Improved germplasm and varieties of sorghum, pigeonpea, chickpea and groundnut<br />

with pro-poor traits and associated advanced knowledge of selection tools and breeding methods<br />

made available to partners internationally<br />

Groundnut<br />

Output target 6.1.1 GN: Each year 50-60 diverse trait-specific (resistance to rust, late leaf spot<br />

(LLS), and other emerging diseases and pests, short- and medium-duration, dual-purpose (food<br />

and fodder), oil types and confectionery types), high yielding breeding populations and advanced<br />

breeding lines developed<br />

Activity 6.1.1.1 GN: Evaluate and introgress new germplasm sources (cultivated and wild Arachis<br />

species) of variability for yield components, resistance to rust, LLS, and other emerging diseases,<br />

crop duration and food and fodder quality traits<br />

Milestone: 10-15 new high yielding lines with resistance to diseases and quality and adaptation traits<br />

identified and made available to NARS. Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

The foliar fungal diseases cause 10% to over 50% pod and haulm yield losses besides adversely<br />

affecting their quality. Host plant resistance compliments with other control measures. Breeding for the<br />

traits like high/low oil and confectionary results in enhanced economic returns to SAT farmers, while<br />

breeding for various maturity durations is essential for local adaptation.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

One hundred new crosses (25 for foliar diseases resistance, 32 for short-duration, 23 for mediumduration<br />

with high oil content and 20 for confectionery traits with high protein content) were completed<br />

in the 2009/10 postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons to generate populations for selection. The new parents<br />

are: ICGV 06149, ICGV 08277, ICGV 07145, ICGV 06150, ICGV 06143, ICGV 08321, ICGV<br />

09141, and ICGV 02411for resistance to foliar diseases; ICGV 08234, ICGV 08237, ICGV 05155,<br />

ICGV 06040, ICGV 06100, ICGV 06420,ICGV 07395, EC 582663, EC 582664-1, ICGV –IS 96894-1,<br />

ICGV 09003, ICGV 09007, ICGV 08234, and ICGV 09141 for short-duration; ICGV 07076, ICGV<br />

07145, ICGV 08268, SunOleic 95R, ICGV 09121, ICGV 08268, ICGV 09141, ICGV 08006, and<br />

ICGV 08030 for medium-duration with high oil content and ICGV 08050, ICGV 08058, ICGV 08112, ICGV<br />

08081, ICGV 90320, ICGV 09190, and ICGV 09003 for confectionery traits with high protein content.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

a. Foliar diseases:<br />

In 2009/10, 149 F 2 -F 11 bulks and 62 plant progenies were evaluated for agronomic traits to select 142<br />

bulks and 3 plant selections; of which 26 advance generation bulks were identified for inclusion in<br />

yield trials. Promising selections came from the two crosses, [(ICGS 44 x (ICGV 87128 x ICG<br />

00246)], and (ICGV 04078 x ICG 13917). During the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 116 F 2 -F 12 bulks and 16 plant<br />

progenies were sown in foliar diseases resistance sick field for further evaluation. From these, 118<br />

bulks and 220 single plants were selected. The most promising selections came from the crosses,<br />

(ICGV 91114 x ICGX 000036) and (ICGV 01352 x ICG 13917.<br />

Yield trials:<br />

i. 2009 rainy season<br />

111 advanced breeding lines (including controls) in 5 replicated trials were evaluated both for diseases<br />

(LLS and Rust) resistance and yield. Same set of 111 advanced breeding lines (including controls) in 5<br />

replicated trials were under evaluation for yield in the 2009/10 postrasiny season. The main results are<br />

as below-<br />

In an Elite Trial (Spanish), 18 out of 19 test varieties (4.4-3.0±0.22 t ha -1 ) produced significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.4 t ha -1 pod yield, with 66% shelling<br />

outturn, 28 g HSW, 57% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 4.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.5). ICGV<br />

06150 produced highest pod yield (4.4 t ha -1 ; with 65% shelling outturn, 34 g HSW, 56% oil content,<br />

252


ust score at 107 DAS = 2.5, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.0) followed by ICGV 06149 (4.4 t ha -1 with<br />

70% shelling outturn, 34 g HSW, 56% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 2.5, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.0).<br />

In an Elite Trial (Virginia), 8 out of 12 test varieties (4.0-3.4±0.16 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher<br />

pod yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 86699 (2.9 t ha -1 , with 61% shelling outturn, 41 g<br />

HSW, 51% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 3.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.0). ICGV 06183<br />

produced highest pod yield (4.0 t ha -1 ; with 68% shelling outturn, 43 g HSW, 54% oil content, rust<br />

score at 107 DAS = 3.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.0) followed by ICGV 06175 (3.9 t ha -1 with 60%<br />

shelling outturn, 34 g HSW, 55% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 3.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.5).<br />

In an Advanced Trial (Spanish), 7 out of 9 test varieties (3.6-2.7±0.21 t ha -1 ) produced significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 98373 (1.5 t ha -1 , with 70% shelling outturn,<br />

48 g HSW, 46% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 2.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 8.0). ICGV 07130<br />

produced highest pod yield (3.6 t ha -1 ; with 60% shelling outturn, 51 g HSW, 53% oil content, rust<br />

score at 107 DAS = 3.0, LLS score 107 DAS = 5.0 ) followed by ICGV 07142 (3.4 t ha -1 with 67%<br />

shelling outturn, 42 g HSW, 57% oil content, rust score at 107 DAS = 3.5, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.5).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Spanish), 15 test varieties (3.6-2.4±0.18 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher pod<br />

yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 86590 (1.8 t ha -1 , with 67% shelling outturn, 38 g HSW,<br />

rust score at 107 DAS = 2.0, and LLS score at 107 DAS = 7.5). ICGV 08305 produced highest pod<br />

yield (3.6 t ha -1 ; with 58% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, rust score at 107 DAS = 3.5, LLS score 107<br />

DAS = 5.5 ) followed by ICGV 08306 (3.5 t ha -1 with 62% shelling outturn, 41 g HSW, rust score at<br />

107 DAS = 4.0, LLS score at 107 DAS = 5.0).<br />

ii. 2009/10 postrainy season:<br />

In an Elite (Spanish) Trial, ICGV 07123 (4.9±0.43 t ha -1 , 70% shelling outturn, 60 g HSW, 24%<br />

protein content) produced significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 86590<br />

(3.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 67% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, 21% protein content).<br />

In Preliminary (Spanish) Trial, twenty varieties (5.2-3.5±0.20 t ha -1 pod yield) produced significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 75% shelling outturn,<br />

44 g HSW). ICGV 08287 gave the highest pod yield (5.2 t ha -1 pod yield, 69% shelling outturn, 70 g<br />

HSW) followed by ICGV 08305 (4.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 70% shelling outturn, 64 g HSW).<br />

In Preliminary (Virginia) Trial, three varieties (4.9-4.6±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield) produced significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 98373 (3.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 72% shelling<br />

outturn, 63 g HSW). ICGV 08321 gave the highest pod yield (4.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 73% shelling outturn,<br />

56 g HSW) followed by ICGV 08320 (4.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 73% shelling outturn, 57 g HSW).<br />

iii. <strong>2010</strong> rainy season:<br />

Seventy six advanced breeding lines (including controls) in five replicated trials were evaluated both<br />

for diseases (LLS and Rust) resistance and yield. At 50 days after sowing (DAS), plots were inoculated<br />

with LLS and rust by spraying the infected and test rows with a mixed conidial suspension of<br />

Phaesariopsis personata conidia and Puccinia arachidis urediniospores for optimum disease<br />

development. Disease symptoms for LLS and rust were rated on a 1 - 9 disease severity scale at 75, 90<br />

and 105 DAS.<br />

In an Elite Trial (Spanish), all 5 test varieties (3.2-2.2±0.23 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher pod<br />

yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 98373 (1.2 t ha -1 pod yield, with 65% shelling outturn, 41<br />

g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 3.0, LLS score at 105 DAS = 7.0). ICGV 07130 produced highest pod<br />

yield (3.2 t ha -1 ; with 60% shelling outturn, 40 g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 4.5, LLS score at 105<br />

DAS = 7.0) followed by ICGV 07143 (3.1 t ha -1 with 67% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW, rust score at<br />

105 DAS = 5.5, LLS score at 105 DAS = 8.0).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Spanish), five test varieties (3.6-2.3±0.21 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher pod<br />

yield than the highest yielding susceptible control JL 24 (1.6 t ha -1 , with 58% shelling outturn, 31 g<br />

HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 7.0, and LLS score at 105 DAS = 8.5), and resistant cultivar ICGV<br />

86590 (1.4 t ha -1 , with 58% shelling outturn, 29 g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 2.5, and LLS score at<br />

105 DAS = 8.0). ICGV 10179 produced highest pod yield (3.6 t ha -1 ; with 60% shelling outturn, 41 g<br />

253


HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 3.0, LLS score 105 DAS = 7.0 ) followed by ICGV 10178 (3.0 t ha -1<br />

with 62% shelling outturn, 41 g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 2.5, LLS score at 105 DAS = 7.0).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Virginia), five test varieties (3.2-2.4±0.17 t ha -1 ) produced significantly higher<br />

pod yield than the highest yielding resistant cultivar ICGV 86699 (2.1 t ha -1 , with 60% shelling outturn,<br />

31 g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 2.5, and LLS score at 105 DAS = 7.0). ICGV 10191 produced<br />

highest pod yield (3.2 t ha -1 ; with 63% shelling outturn, 28 g HSW, rust score at 105 DAS = 5.5, LLS<br />

score 105 DAS = 7.5 ) followed by ICGV 10193 (3.2 t ha -1 with 60% shelling outturn, 40 g HSW, rust<br />

score at 105 DAS = 3.0, LLS score at 105 DAS = 8.0).<br />

b. Short duration:<br />

From 215 bulk populations and 340 single plant progenies grown in the 2009/10 postrainy season, 387<br />

F 2 -F 11 bulks and 379 single plant selections, based on agronomic traits, were made. Of these, 21 bulk<br />

selections in advanced generations were identified for inclusion in replicated yield trials. In 358 bulk<br />

populations and 374 single plant progenies grown in the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 429 F 2 -F 14 bulks and 758<br />

single plant selections, based on agronomic traits, were made. The most promising selections came<br />

from (ICGV 93437 x ICGV 00308), (ICGV 00309 x ICGV 03178), a0nd (ICGV 02022 x ICGV<br />

97045) crosses.<br />

Yield trials:<br />

i. 2009 rainy season:<br />

In an Advanced Trial at 90 DAS harvest two entries outyielded (3.7± 0.29 t ha -1 each) the highest<br />

yielding early-maturing control TAG 24 (2.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 61 % shelling outturn, 39 g HSW). EC<br />

582670 gave the highest pod yield (3.7 t ha -1 , 50 % shelling outturn and 39 g HSW) followed by L 24<br />

(3.7 t ha -1 , 52 % shelling outturn and 40 g HSW).<br />

ii. 2009/10 postrainy season<br />

In Preliminary (Spanish) Trial, four varieties (3.4-3.0±0.24 t ha -1 pod yield) produced significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control JL 24 (2.2 t ha -1 pod yield, 54% shelling outturn, 34 g<br />

HSW). ICGV 09008 gave the highest pod yield (3.4 t ha -1 pod yield, 63% shelling outturn, 41 g HSW)<br />

followed by ICGV 09011 (3.2 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 55 g HSW).<br />

iii. 2009 rainy season:<br />

In an Advanced Trial at 90 DAS harvest three entries out-yielded (2.2± 0.25 t ha -1 each) the highest<br />

yielding early-maturing control JL 24 (1.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 63 % shelling outturn, 23 g HSW). ICGV<br />

09014 gave the highest pod yield (2.2 t ha -1 , 76 % shelling outturn and 28 g HSW) followed by ICGV<br />

09009 (1.9 t ha -1 , 59 % shelling outturn and 23 g HSW).<br />

In Preliminary Trial at 90 DAS harvest two entries outyielded (2.5± 0.27 t ha -1 each) the highest<br />

yielding early-maturing control DH 86 (1.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 67 % shelling outturn, 25 g HSW). ICGV<br />

10004 gave the highest pod yield (2.5 t ha -1 , 61 % shelling outturn and 26 g HSW) followed by ICGV<br />

10018 (2.5 t ha -1 , 62 % shelling outturn and 28 g HSW).<br />

c. Medium duration:<br />

In the 2009/10 postrainy season, 184 bulk populations and 53 plant progenies were sown for<br />

evaluation. From these, 204 F 2 -F 11 bulks and 55 single plant selections were made. Of these, 74 bulk<br />

selections in advanced generations were identified for inclusion in replicated yield trials The most<br />

promising selections came from (ICGV 99159 x ICGV 95042) and (ICGV 01274 x ICGV 04124)<br />

crosses. Similarly in the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 140 bulk populations and 55 plant progenies were sown for<br />

evaluation. From these, 188 F 2 -F 11 bulks and 290 single plant selections were made. The most<br />

promising selections came from (ICGV 99159 x ICGV 93155), (ICGV 95017 x ICGV 00002), and<br />

(ICGV 97069 x ICGV 99159) crosses.<br />

Yield trials:<br />

During the 2009 rainy and in the 2009/10 postrainy seasons ninety eight advanced breeding lines<br />

including controls in six replicated yield trials were under evaluation. An elite trial (Spanish) was<br />

evaluated under rain-fed conditions also. The results of the two season are given bellowi.<br />

2009 rainy season:<br />

254


In an Elite Trial (Spanish) under irrigation conditions, seven test varieties (4.4-4.0±0.14 t ha -1 pod<br />

yield) significantly outperformed the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (3.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 64%<br />

shelling outturn, 28 g HSW, and 56% oil content). ICGV 07047 ranked first in pod yield (4.4 t ha -1 pod<br />

yield, 60% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, and 54% oil content) followed by ICGV 07057 (4.4 t ha -1 pod<br />

yield, 60% shelling outturn, 41 g HSW, and 52% oil content). Under rain-fed conditions, eleven<br />

(including these seven) test lines (4.0-2.9±0.10 t ha -1 pod significantly outperformed the highest<br />

yielding control GPBD 4 (2.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 58% shelling outturn, 22 g HSW, and 54% oil content).<br />

ICGV 07047 produced pod yield (4.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 62% shelling outturn, 43 g HSW, and 51% oil<br />

content) ranked first in both irrigated and rain-fed conditions.<br />

In an Advanced Trial (Spanish), eleven test varieties (4.5-3.5±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly<br />

outperformed the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 52% shelling outturn, 24 g<br />

HSW, and 55% oil content). ICGV 08234 ranked first in pod yield (4.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 71% shelling<br />

outturn, 44 g HSW, and 57% oil content) followed by ICGV 08239 (4.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 60% shelling<br />

outturn, 50 g HSW, and 50% oil content).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Spanish), only one line ICGV 09121 (4.3±0.27 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling<br />

outturn, and 40 g HSW) significantly outperformed the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (3.3 t ha -1 pod<br />

yield, 63% shelling outturn, and 29 g HSW).<br />

ii. 2009/10 postrainy season:<br />

None of test lines significantly out yielded the best control cultivar ICGV 95070 in Spanish group and<br />

ICGS 76 in Virginia group. However in an Advanced Trial, ICGV 08234 (4.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 73%<br />

shelling outturn and 47 g HSW) shown 10% yield advantage over best yielding control cultivar ICGV<br />

95070 (4.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 73% shelling outturn and 55 g HSW).<br />

iii. <strong>2010</strong> rainy season:<br />

One hundred and thirty one advanced breeding lines including controls in six replicated trials were evaluated.<br />

In an Elite Trial (Spanish) three test varieties (4.8±0.15 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outperformed the<br />

highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 51% shelling outturn, 22 g HSW). ICGV 08234<br />

ranked first in pod yield (4.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 71% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW) followed by ICGV<br />

08237 (3.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 60% shelling outturn, 35 g HSW).<br />

In an Advanced Trial (Spanish), two test varieties (3.8±0.14 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outperformed<br />

the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 57% shelling outturn, 28 g HSW). ICGV<br />

09119 ranked first in pod yield (3.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 55% shelling outturn, 77 g HSW) followed by<br />

ICGV 09121 (3.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling outturn, 34 g HSW).<br />

In an Advanced Trial (Virginia), three test varieties (2.5±0.20 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly<br />

outperformed the highest yielding control ICGV 97115 (1.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 60% shelling outturn, 43g<br />

HSW). ICGV 09137 ranked first in pod yield (2.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 64% shelling outturn, 42 g HSW)<br />

followed by ICGV 09138 (2.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 64% shelling outturn, 46 g HSW).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Spanish), Out of 48 test lines 38 lines (4.3-2.5±0.30 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly<br />

outperformed the highest yielding control GPBD 4 (2.1 t ha -1 pod yield, 52% shelling outturn, and 21 g<br />

HSW). ICGV 10148 ranked first in pod yield (4.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW)<br />

followed by ICGV 10143 (4.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 70% shelling outturn, 33 g HSW).<br />

In Preliminary Trial (Virginia), three test lines (3.8±0.19 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outperformed<br />

the highest yielding control ICGV 97115 (2.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling outturn, and 29 g HSW).<br />

ICGV 10159 ranked first in pod yield (3.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 67% shelling outturn, 49 g HSW) followed<br />

by ICGV 10165 (3.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling outturn, 39 g HSW).<br />

d. High/low oil content:<br />

A set of 150 advanced breeding lines and 10 checks belonging to either high oil (>55% oil) or low oil<br />

(


Yield Trials:<br />

i. 2009 rainy season:<br />

During the 2009 rainy season at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> location out of 150 test entries, 69 were recorded high oil<br />

(60% - 55%) content and for pod yield 6 (4.9-4.4±0.41 t ha -1 pod yield) test entries significantly<br />

outperformed the highest yielding control ICGV 00350 (3.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 67% shelling outturn, 32 g<br />

HSW, and 55% oil content). ICGV 07108 ranked first in pod yield (4.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 56% shelling<br />

outturn, 36 g HSW, and 53% oil content) followed by ICGV 06139 (4.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 60% shelling<br />

outturn, 31 g HSW, and 56% oil content). The top five entries of high oil yield and five entries of low<br />

oil yield varieties performance is given in Table 6.1.<br />

Table 6.1: Performance of groundnut breeding lines for various traits<br />

IDENTITY<br />

Pod<br />

yield<br />

kg/ha Rank<br />

Seed<br />

Yield<br />

kg/ha Rank<br />

Oil yield<br />

kg/ha Rank SH% OIL%<br />

ICGV 06423 4270 9 2989 4 1734 1 70 58<br />

ICGV 06018 4355 7 3092 1 1732 2 71 56<br />

ICGV 02411 4486 3 3050 2 1708 3 68 56<br />

ICGV 06149 4407 6 3041 3 1703 4 69 56<br />

ICGV 06139 4723 2 2834 5 1587 5 60 56<br />

ICGV 86564 1571 156 927 156 445 155 59 48<br />

ICGV 07359 1678 153 1057 148 444 156 63 42<br />

ICGV 07368 1679 152 1058 147 134 157 63 41<br />

ICGV 00451 1493 157 836 158 418 158 56 50<br />

ICGV 05182 2000 139 880 157 396 160 44 45<br />

Controls<br />

TMV 2 1343 159 792 160 412 159 59 52<br />

M 335 1709 151 1025 152 151 154 60 44<br />

ICGS 76 2014 135 1249 137 562 142 62 45<br />

TAG 24 1840 144 1196 142 646 133 65 54<br />

JL 24 1963 142 1217 140 657 129 62 54<br />

Dh 86 2057 133 1255 135 665 128 61 53<br />

ICR 48 2092 132 1360 126 666 126 65 49<br />

ICGV 91114 2004 138 1343 131 712 118 67 53<br />

GPBD 4 2575 104 1545 102 896 88 60 58<br />

ICGV 00350 3557 39 2383 29 1311 30 67 55<br />

SE 412.6 1.141<br />

Grand mean 2911 52.9<br />

CV% 14.17 2.158<br />

LSD 814.9 2.254<br />

ii. 2009/10 postrainy season:<br />

At <strong>ICRISAT</strong> location, out of 150 test lines only two lines gave high oil % ICGV 06420 (56% oil, 1.8 t<br />

ha -1 oil yield, 4.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 72% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, and 22% protein content) and<br />

ICGV 07014 (55% oil, 1.9 t ha -1 oil yield, 4.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 76% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, and<br />

26% protein content) and seven lines gave low oil % (44-42%).<br />

256


For pod yield four test lines (5.0-4.8±0.47 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outperformed the highest<br />

yielding control ICGV 00350 (4.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 74% shelling outturn, 46 g HSW, 53% oil and 25%<br />

protein content). ICGV 04093 ranked first in pod yield (5.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 70% shelling outturn, 48 g<br />

HSW, 51% oil and 27% protein content) followed by ICGV 07368 (4.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 76% shelling<br />

outturn, 100 g HSW, 42% oil and 26% protein content). Other locations trial data are being analyzed.<br />

iii. <strong>2010</strong> rainy season: Oil and proteine analysisi is under process.<br />

e. High/low protein content:<br />

Similarly a set comprising of 52 advanced breeding lines and 8 checks for either high (>25% protein)<br />

or low (


Conclusions The varieties released over the years are the products of this activity. During the period<br />

under report five groundnut varieties, ICGV 96342, ICGV 94301 and ICFV 87846 were released in<br />

three countries.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: 6-8 high yielding dual-purpose groundnut varieties in a range of maturity groups with<br />

resistance to chronic biotic constraints available for release and commercialization 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Crop-livestock is the predominant production system in SAT regions hence development of dualpurpose<br />

groundnut varieties gives an additional advantage of supporting the livestock.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Fodder quality testing and multi-location testing of promising dual purpose groundnut genotypes<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

One hundred and fifty two groundnut haulm samples each from Kadiri, Junagadh, Shirgaon<br />

(Ratnagiri), Maharashtra, and samples of IVT-II trial from Jalgaon center (Maharashtra), were received<br />

and handed over to ILRI for fodder quality analysis. The results of fodder quality analysis are awaited<br />

from ILRI.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A dual purpose variety, ICGV 91114 was released in Karnataka for cultivation in drought-prone areas<br />

of the state.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: 8-10 selected advanced breeding lines in each partner country evaluated for local<br />

adaptation and farmer-preferred traits in SAT Asia 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Evaluation of selected breeding lines for local adaptation and farmer-preferred traits is important to<br />

identify and promote the lines best suited for different/varied locations of SAT Asia<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 11 International Trials were conducted to evaluate selected breeding lines of groundnut.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Seeds of 34 sets of international trials sets and 123 advanced breeding lines were provided to<br />

cooperators in 14 countries<br />

International trials<br />

(a) An existing series of six international trials were multiplied in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season for distribution to<br />

collaborators at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> centre, Patancheru, India as indicated below:<br />

1. Twelfth International Short-duration Groundnut Varietal Trial (XII ISGVT)<br />

2. Twelfth International Medium-duration Groundnut Varietal Trial (SB) [XII IMGVT(SB)]<br />

3. Twelfth International Medium-duration Groundnut Varietal Trial (VB) [XII IMGVT(VB)]<br />

4. Twelfth International Foliar Diseases Resistant Groundnut Varietal Trial (XII IFDRGVT)<br />

5. Twelfth International Confectionery Groundnut Varietal Trial (XII ICGVT)<br />

6. Eighth International Drought Resistant Groundnut Varietal Trial (VIII IDRGVT)<br />

(b) Five new series of international trials were constituted and multiplied in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season for<br />

distribution to collaborators at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> centre, Patancheru, India as indicated below:<br />

1 Thirteenth International Medium-duration Groundnut Varietal Trial (SB) [XIII IMGVT(SB)]<br />

2 Thirteenth International Medium-duration Groundnut Varietal Trial (VB) [XIII IMGVT(VB)]<br />

3 Thirteenth International Foliar Diseases Resistant Groundnut Varietal Trial (XIII IFDRGVT)<br />

4 Ninth International Drought Resistant Groundnut Varietal Trial (IX IDRGVT)<br />

5 Fourth International Aflatoxin Resistant Groundnut Varietal Trial (IV IAFRGVT)<br />

258


Conclusions<br />

From elite trials, 12 (Spanish) and 6 (Virginia) lines for foliar disease resistance; 15 (Spanish) lines for<br />

medium duration; and 7 (Spanish) and 7 (Virginia) lines for drought tolerance were selected to include<br />

in International nursery trials<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: Farmer-preferred variety(ies) in each partner country identified <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Participatory farmer’s selection of varieties plays an important role in identification of elite groundnut<br />

genotypes suitable for local conditions/preferences with a significant bearing on subsequent adoption<br />

by farmers.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Participatory farmer’s selection of varieties is done by conducting on-farm trials.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The following farmer-preferred varieties of groundnut have been identified in partner countries.<br />

India: ICGV 91114 in AP, Orissa and Jharkhand and ICGS 76 in Chhattisgarh<br />

Nepal: Rajarshi, B4 and Baidehi<br />

Vietnam: L 14 and L 23, L26, D0401<br />

Conclusions<br />

Farmer’s preferred varieties have been successfully identified through on-farm trials in partner<br />

countries, India, Nepal and Vietnam.<br />

Milestone: Five interspecific derivatives of groundnut evaluated for TSV and peanut bud necrosis virus<br />

(PBNV) diseases and promising lines identified <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Wild relatives of groundnut (Arachis species) have multiple disease resistance. Painstaking work of<br />

using these diploid species in the crossing program has already been done at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Tetraploid and<br />

stable generation is already available. Since PBND is an important disease of groundnut, causing yield<br />

losses in the disease prone areas, some of the interspecific derivatives were tested for PBND resistance<br />

in its hotspot locations.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The material was first tested under glasshouse conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in 2007 and the results were promising. Based on<br />

these results multilocation and testing in disease hotspot was undertaken in 2009-10.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

More than 300 interspecific derivatives of groundnut were screened in 2007 for PBND under<br />

glasshouse conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Many of the derivatives did not show any infection visually and<br />

through ELISA. Sixteen interspecific derivative lines were screened in <strong>2010</strong> at PBND hotspot<br />

locations at Raichur and Ananthapur. The results of the screening experiment are presented in Table<br />

6.2. All the 16 lines showed low disease incidence at Ananthapur compared to the local check,<br />

whereas only 7 lines out of 16 showed low disease incidence at Raichur. Resistant lines (in bold) will<br />

be checked again for PBND incidence at the hotspot location/s to confirm resistance.<br />

Figure 6.1: PBND screening at Ananthapur Figure 6.2: PBND screening at Raichur<br />

259


Conclusions<br />

The screening experiment in both the hotspot locations show that it is possible to introgress PBND<br />

resistance from Arachis species and the activity on the development and screening of interspecific<br />

population should be expanded using all the available interspecific derivatives.<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, Harikrishna Sudini,<br />

Gururaj Sunkad (RARS, Raichur),<br />

and R Radhika (RARS, Ananthapur, India)<br />

Table 6.2. PBND disease screening data at hotspot locations at Raichur and Ananthapur<br />

PBND incidence at<br />

S.No.<br />

% PBND<br />

incidence at<br />

Ananthapur<br />

% PBND incidence<br />

at Raichur<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

(2007 glasshouse<br />

data)<br />

1 4.3 11.90 0.0<br />

2 3.30 13.16 0.0<br />

3 4.25 34.62 -<br />

4 4.57 28.57 -<br />

5 3.35 16.67 -<br />

6 2.03 12.66 0.0<br />

7 1.77 23.53 -<br />

8 4.63 20.63 -<br />

9 2.44 39.29 -<br />

10 9.09 8.47 -<br />

11 6.93 17.95 -<br />

12 8.33 13.16 0.0<br />

13 7.23 17.44 -<br />

14 8.69 12.36 -<br />

15 7.18 25.81 -<br />

16 9.85 3.45 -<br />

Local check - 43.75<br />

Local check >30 % -<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> check JL 24 90 %<br />

Milestone: Five stable interspecific derivatives with resistance to LLS and TSV/bud necrosis tested on<br />

farmers’ fields. 2011<br />

To be done during 2011<br />

Activity 6.1.1.2 GN: Develop a better understanding of inheritance of components of resistance to<br />

late leaf spot (LLS) and confectionery traits<br />

Milestone: Knowledge of inheritance of confectionery traits in two crosses gained and appropriate<br />

breeding strategy devised, <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Knowledge of inheritance helps in designing an appropriate breeding program leading to better/desired<br />

results.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Generation mean analysis using the data of Parents, F1, BC1(backcross to parent 1), BC2 (backcross<br />

to parent 2) and F2<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Generation mean analysis to elucidate inheritance pattern of confectionery traits is completed and paper<br />

communicated for publication.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Inheritance studies have been completed and communicated for publication.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

260


Milestone: Three mapping populations for LLS, and two for confectionery traits developed 2011<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Four populations of Rcombinant Inbred Lines were developed followings single seed decent method<br />

from the crosses, JL 24X ICG 11337, and L 24 x ICG 1391 for LLS resistance; and ICGV 01393 x<br />

Chico and ICGV 02251 x Chico for confectionary traits.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

154 F8 RILs of the cross JL 24X ICG 11337 cross and 114 F8 RILs of JL 24 x ICG 13919 planted in<br />

rainy <strong>2010</strong> were screened for LLS.<br />

The mapping populations developed during 2009 rainy season which includes 561 F 8 RILs of JL 24 x<br />

ICG 11337 cross and 861 F 8 RILs of JL 24 x ICG 13919 cross and those developed for confectionary<br />

trait 678 and 781 F 6 RILs in ICGV 01393 x Chico and ICGV 02251 x Chico crosses, respectively were<br />

preserved in cold storage for future use in mapping studies.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Four mapping populations have been developed and made available to partners for further studies.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Output target 6.1.2 GN: Promising transgenic events of groundnut for resistance to TSV and<br />

PBNV available for commercialization and introgression in locally adapted germplasm<br />

Activity 6.1.2.1 GN: Develop transgenic events of groundnut for resistance to TSV and evaluate their<br />

performance under contained greenhouse and field conditions<br />

Milestone: Two transgenic events with resistance to TSV used for introgression into locally adapted<br />

groundnut genotypes 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

To develop and evaluate transgenic groundnut for resistance to TSV for which there is no available<br />

resistance in the existing germplasm.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Vector mediated transmission studies undertaken for event selection in greenhouse and strip trial under<br />

confined field conditions.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The transgenic events (18; including the ones showing delayed symptoms) that showed promise in<br />

virus challenging assays are being advanced to subsequent generations (T3) in the containment<br />

greenhouse for seed multiplication and to study the inheritance pattern and further evaluations. The<br />

selected transgenic groundnut events were confirmed by PCR and RT-PCR before subjecting for virus<br />

challenging. Vector-mediated virus challenging was carried out for subsequent evaluation of the<br />

previously selected transgenic events reducing the chance of varying viral loads in the inoculum, an<br />

important factor in standardization of virus challenging experiment. A comprehensive evaluation of<br />

these events was carried out using thrips-mediated transmission of virus under greenhouse conditions<br />

using cellulose butyrate cages having ventilators of 40 mesh.. Field grown parthenium plants infected<br />

with TSV were identified using ELISA. Pollen was collected from these plants for use as TSV source.<br />

The transgenic plants were grown in small pots and were kept under cellulose butyrate cage having<br />

ventilators of 40 mesh. Eight day old test plants were sprinkled with TSV infected parthenium pollen<br />

and 10 thrips/plant were released in these cages. Thrips were allowed to feed for 48 hours after which<br />

dimethoate @ 2 ml/L was sprayed to kill thrips. Plants were observed for symptom development for 15<br />

days. Both the symptomatic as well as symptomless plants were tested by ELISA for the presence of<br />

virus. The selected plants which did not show any symptoms of the disease were allowed to complete<br />

their life cycle and seeds were harvested for further evaluations.. A strip trial was conducted in a<br />

nethouse under confined field conditions for event selection during the rainy season of <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

selected transgenic events were advanced to further generations. Additionally, over 50 marker-free<br />

transgenic events carrying the TSVcp gene have been developed and characterized at the molecular<br />

level using routine procedures. Preliminary biosafety data pertaining to protein heat stability, and<br />

pepsin digestibility assays as prerequisites for conducting contained field evaluations of these<br />

261


transgenic events has been generated. TSV coat protein got digested completely within a minute in the<br />

SGF (simulated grastric fluid) and it is confirmed by subjecting the digested protein samples to SDS-<br />

PAGE and western blot.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Eight selected events in T3 generations selected for advancement of generations for further<br />

phenotyping under confined field conditions.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and<br />

Harikrishna Sudini<br />

Activity 6.1.2.2 GN: Develop transgenic events of groundnut for resistance to PBNV and evaluate<br />

their performance under contained greenhouse and field conditions<br />

Milestone: At least 10 promising transgenic events identified and resistance to PBNV characterized<br />

under greenhouse conditions <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

To develop and evaluate transgenic groundnut for resistance to PBNV for which there is no available<br />

resistance in the existing germplasm.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The T 2 progenies from virus challenged (promising transgenic events) events were selected through<br />

molecular and phenotypic characterization and have been progressed to T6 generation. Since, earlier<br />

attempts to control PBNV were focused mainly on harnessing host plant resistance by cross protection<br />

or transgenic approaches to obtain coat protein mediated resistance, we hypothesize that apparent lack<br />

of resistance to PBNV in transgenic plants could be attributable to the presence of RNA silencing<br />

suppressor gene (NSs) in the PBNV genome, which could be rendering PBNVnp gene ineffective.<br />

Hence, strategies were developed for antisense or hairpin RNA mediated gene silencing in groundnut<br />

for resistance to PBNV.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The PBNVnp gene in an antisense orientation driven by the double 35S CaMV promoter in a markerfree<br />

plasmid (pZPP200) was used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of groundnut. Among<br />

52 T 0 events, 22 were screened positive based on PCR, RT-PCR and western analysis and advanced to<br />

T 1 generation for seed multiplication. Besides, a variant of above construct that harbors genes encoding<br />

schaffold attached region protein (SARp) flanking the PBNV insert in the pPZP200 was designed and<br />

used for transformation. 11 primary transformants were produced and characterized at molecular level.<br />

Besides, T2 progenies of 10 transgenic events carrying PBNV N gene in antisense orientation (ASNP)<br />

were evaluated under greenhouse conditions using mechanical inoculation of PBNV. Interestingly, 6<br />

events didn’t show any symptoms of the disease. The selected events were advanced to further<br />

generations.<br />

Simultaneous strategies are being developed for hairpin RNA mediated gene silencing. Since the<br />

virulence factor and vital genes of PBNV are not known so far, many genes can be targeted and the<br />

silencing effects of individual gene can be studied. Coding regions of PBNV genome were identified<br />

for genes such as NP (nucleoprotein), NSm (movement protein) and NSs (Silencing suppressor protein)<br />

and gene-specific primers were designed for amplification of the desired gene fragments. Virusinfected<br />

groundnut leaf samples were collected and partial Ng and NSs genes were amplified using<br />

gene specific primers, cloned and confirmed by sequencing. Simultaneous targeting of multiple genes<br />

(Ng and NSs) using a chimeric hairpin RNA cassettes has been planned by generating chimeric RNAs<br />

using overlap extension PCR (OE-PCR) using two flanking and two bridge primers. A chimeric RNA<br />

construct was amplified successfully using this method where the targeting sequences of nucleoprotein<br />

(Ng) and silencing suppressor (NSs) genes was cloned and confirmed by sequencing. The constructs<br />

carrying single gene (Ng) and chimeric genes (Ng + NSs) in both sense and antisense orientation were<br />

cloned into pHANNIBAL vector and are currently being subcloned into binary vectors for use in<br />

transformation studies in tobacco and groundnut.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Several events carrying PBNVnp gene in antisense orientation (ASNP) showed very little or no<br />

symptoms of the disease under the virus challenging assays in greenhouse conditions. These events<br />

262


have been advanced to further generations for subsequent phenotyping using mechanical as well as<br />

vector mediated transmission assays.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and<br />

Harikrishna Sudini<br />

Chickpea<br />

Output target 6.1.1 CP: 50-100 chickpea breeding lines with high yield, improved seed traits and<br />

resistance to one or more biotic stresses [Fusarium wilt (FW), Ascochyta blight (AB), Botrytis<br />

gray mold (BGM) and Helicoverpa pod borer] developed and disseminated to NARS<br />

Activity 6.1.1.1 CP: Develop chickpea breeding lines (desi and kabuli) with enhanced resistance to<br />

AB, BGM and FW<br />

Milestone: 15-20 new high yielding FW resistant desi and kabuli chickpea breeding lines made<br />

available to NARS Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

Fusarium wilt (FW) is the most important root disease of chickpea in the SAT regions. All breeding<br />

materials developed for the SAT regions must have high resistance to FW.<br />

(A) International Nurseries:<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

International Chickpea Screening Nurseries (ICSNs) for desi and kabuli consisting of 18 advanced<br />

breeding lines each along with one common check and one local check were evaluated by partners. The<br />

ICSN-Desi was supplied to 25 locations (Allahabad, Badnapur, Banswara, Berhampore, Berthin,<br />

Dharwad, Dholi, Durgapur, Gulbarga, Hiriyur, Hisar, Jabalpur, Junagadh, IIPR-Kanpur, CSAU A&T-<br />

Kanpur, Ludhiana, Nandyal, New Delhi, Pantnagar, Rahuri, Raipur, Ranchi, Samba, Sehore and<br />

Shillongani), while ICSN-Kabuli was also supplied to 25 locations (Habak and all locations of ICSN-<br />

Desi, except Raipur).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The data on evaluation was received from 25 locations for ICSN-Desi and 23 locations for ICSN-<br />

Kabuli . Based on overall mean of grain yield, seven entries in ICSN-Desi (ICCV 09102, ICCV 09103,<br />

ICCV 09104, ICCV 09106, ICCV 09107, ICCV 09112 and ICCV 09115) were found superior (at least<br />

5 % higher yield) to the common check JG 11. There was no kabuli entry that outperformed the<br />

common check KAK 2. But, 15 entries recorded larger seed (100-seed weight 39.3 to 44.3g as<br />

compared to 36.8g of KAK 2). The top five kabuli lines based on 100-seed weight are: ICCV 09304,<br />

ICCV 09311, ICCV 09312, ICCV 09313 and ICCV 09315.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Promising lines were identified and will be evaluated by partners in the station trials.<br />

PM Gaur, Shailesh Tripati, CLL Gowda and NARS partners<br />

(B) Station Trials:<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

In total, 82 chickpea breeding lines (32 desi & 50 kabuli) along with 2-3 checks were evaluated in RBD<br />

design to identify high yielding and FW resistant lines.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Selected 18 superior performing lines each in desi and kabuli types based on yield and FW resistance<br />

data as compared to checks (JG 11 in desi type and KAK 2 in kabuli type). The top five desi lines with<br />

high yield and good tolerance levels to FW are ICCX-030053-F4-P1-BP-BP, ICCX-03003-F4-P14BP-<br />

BP, ICCX-030038-F4-P6-BP-BP, ICCX-030038-F4-P28-BP-BP and ICCX-030042-F4-P9-BP-BP.<br />

The average increase in yield in the selected desi lines was 10-12% over the check. The top five kabuli<br />

lines selected are ICCX-030163-F4-P13-BP-BP, ICCX-030163-F4-P16-BP-BP, ICCX-030185-F4-<br />

P12-BP-BP, ICCX-030141-F4-P9-BP-BP and ICCX-030188-F4-P3-BP-BP. The overall increase in<br />

yield of the best performing kabuli lines was 10-15% (over the check). Kabuli large seeded lines were<br />

263


selected based on their 100 seed weight and FW resistance in relation to the check KAK 2. The top five<br />

lines are ICCX-030208-F4-P8-BP-BP, ICCX-030208-F4-P7-BP-BP, ICCX-030208-F4-P6-BP-BP,<br />

ICCX-030199-F4-P22-BP-BP and ICCX-030178-F4-P9-BP-BP. Percentage increase in seed weight of<br />

the superior performing lines over the check was ~ 30%.<br />

Conclusions<br />

18 lines each in desi and kabuli types along with 11 lines in kabuli large type were selected and made<br />

available to the NARS partners in form of ICSNs.<br />

PM Gaur, Shailesh Tripathi, CLL Gowda,<br />

Suresh Pande and Mamta Sharma<br />

(C) Identification of sources of FW resistance:<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Fifty advanced, 90 further advanced chickpea lines and in collaboration with NARS partners (AICRP-<br />

Chickpea), 236 entries [IVT –desi (27), AVT 1-late sown (6), IVT-late sown (24), IVT-rainfed (24),<br />

AVT 1-kabuli (16), AVT 1-extra large kabuli (8), IVT-kabuli (16), IVT 1-extra large kabuli (8),<br />

National Nursery - NNW lines (73), Differential lines (12), wilt resistance lines –W (22)] belonging to<br />

different national trials were evaluated for wilt and root rot resistance in multiple disease sick plot and<br />

for fusarium wilt (FW) resistance in wilt sick plot under artificial epiphytotic conditions following<br />

standard field evaluation technique at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Among the 50 advanced lines, 38 lines were found resistant (


Milestone: 20-30 sources of resistance to FW, BGM, and AB tested for stability across locations and<br />

pathotypes in Asia Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

(1) To identify stable and broad based resistance to Fusarium wilt (FW), ascochyta blight (AB) and<br />

botrytis grey mold (BGM), chickpea lines having resistance to FW, AB and BGM identified at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru for multilocational evaluation, and (2) to find out virulent pathotype for<br />

laboratory and greenhouse studies.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Evaluation of Chickpea Nurseries for resistance to FW, Ascochyta Blight (AB) and Botrytis Gray Mold<br />

(BGM):The chickpea wilt and root rot nursery (CWRRN) at 13 locations, International Ascochyta<br />

Blight Nursery (IABN) at three locations and International Botrytis Gray Mold Nursery (IBGMN) at<br />

three locations were evaluated for FW, AB and BGM resistance in India during 2009-10 season. Each<br />

nursery, consisted of 30 entries, of which 28 were resistant/ moderately resistant to FW/AB/BGM +2<br />

susceptible cultivars for each disease. Data on wilt was recorded thrice at seedling, flowering and at<br />

maturity stages of the crop. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru the wilt nursery material was evaluated in wilt<br />

sick plot and for AB and BGM nursery was evaluated under controlled environment conditions<br />

following standardized whole plant screening technique.<br />

Collection, purification and maintenance of pathotypes: The isolates of different pathogens (Fusarium<br />

oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, Ascochyta rabiei, Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia bataticola) were collected<br />

from infected chickpea roots and foliar parts from different locations of India. The chickpea infected<br />

plant parts (stem and root) from each location were surface sterilized with 1% NaOCl for 2 min and<br />

plated on different selective medium.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Evaluation of Chickpea Nurseries for resistance to FW, AB and BGM: Out of 13 CWRRN locations,<br />

one entry ICCV 05529 was found resistant (


Materials and Methods<br />

One thousand sixty six F5-F7 progenies and 114 advanced breeding lines from COGGO project were<br />

evaluated for FW in wilt sick plot under artificial epiphytotic conditions and for AB and BGM under<br />

controlled environment conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Out of 1066, F5-F7 populations, 99 showed asymptomatic (0% incidence), 57 showed resistant<br />

reaction (0.1-10% incidence) and 73 showed moderate resistant reaction (10.1-20% incidence) to FW.<br />

Four entries (ICCX-040123-F3-P5, ICCX-040123-F3-P13, ICCX-040123-F3-P23 and ICCX-040168-<br />

F4-P23-BP) showed resistant reaction (0.1-10% incidence) and 293 showed moderate resistant reaction<br />

(10.1-20% incidence) to AB. High levels of resistance to BGM were not found in F5-F7 populations.<br />

However, 141 entries showed moderate resistant reaction (10.1- 20% incidence) to BGM. Out of 114<br />

advanced AB resistant lines, four (ICCV 05527, ICCV 05528, ICCV 05533 and ICCV 05534) showed<br />

resistant reaction (0.1-10% incidence) and five (ICCV 05507, ICCV 05526, ICCV 08312, ICCV 97207<br />

and ICCV 98504) moderate resistant reaction (10.1-20% incidence) to wilt.<br />

Combined resistance:<br />

• Thirty three entries showed combined resistance to FW (


ICC 13524, ICC 15762, and ICC 16903 suffered lower H. armigera damage and plant mortality due to<br />

seedling diseases, and also exhibited high yield potential under unprotected conditions.<br />

In the medium-duration nursery, pod borer infestation was very high and the leaf damage ratings at the<br />

vegetative stage (30 days after seedling emergence) varied from 6.0 – 9.0 (7.0 in ICC 3137). At<br />

maturity, the overall resistance score ranged from 4.5 – 8.5 (7.0 in ICC 3137). There were 0.0 to 6.0<br />

larvae per 5 plants at the vegetative stage and 2.0 – 26.5 larvae at the flowering stage (compared to 4.5<br />

and 26.5 larvae in ICC 3137 at the vegetative and flowering stages, respectively). Twenty-two lines<br />

showed a yield potential of 1.16 to 1.73 tonnes ha -1 under unprotected conditions compared to 1.95<br />

tonnes ha -1 of ICCV 10 and 0.62 tonnes ha -1 of KAK 2. Four lines showed a yield potential of 1.0 - 1.6<br />

tonnes ha -1 under unprotected conditions compared to 0.5 tonnes ha -1 of KAK 2. Fourteen lines suffered<br />


09118 suffered moderate levels of pod damage, 1.52 tonnes ha -1 (compared to 1.6 tonnes ha -1 in JG 11).<br />

Evaluation of advanced breeding lines for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera:<br />

Rationale<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of chickpea. Therefore, there<br />

is a need to develop insect resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore,<br />

we evaluated the chickpea nurseries for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during the 2009/10<br />

postrainy season to identify high yielding lines with resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Advanced breeding/germplasm lines with potential for adaptation across Asia and Africa (142) were<br />

evaluated for resistance to H. armigera under field conditions. There were two replications in a<br />

randomized complete block design. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, H. armigera damage at<br />

the vegetative and maturity stages visually on a damage rating scale of 1 - 9, H. armigera eggs and<br />

larvae per 5 plants at the vegetative and flowering stages, wilt (%), and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The genotypes D001 (ICCV 10 x ICC 4522), D002 (ICCV 10 x ICC 4522), D017 (ICCV 10 x ICC<br />

4874), D027 (ICCV 10 x ICC 6924), D029 (ICCV 10 x ICC 12451), D049 (ICCV 93954 x ICC 4522),<br />

D063 (ICCV 93954 x ICC 4874), ICCV 07104, ICCV 08106, ICCV 0810, K034, ICCV 08311, and JG<br />

130 exhibited moderate levels of resistance to pod borer, less susceptibility to diseases, and high yield<br />

potential. The results suggested that a number of breeding lines had good levels of recovery resistance<br />

despite suffering heavy pod borer damage during the vegetative stage. In another experiment, a set of<br />

30 lines was evaluated for resistance to H. armigera under field and laboratory conditions. The<br />

genotypes D039, D050, ICCV 09311, ICCV 95334, and K010 exhibited moderate levels of resistance<br />

to pod borer, and had yield potential of >10 q ha -1 under natural infestation.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The results suggested that a number of selected germplasm/breeding lines had good levels of recovery<br />

resistance despite suffering heavy pod borer damage during the vegetative stage.<br />

HC Sharma, PM Gaur and CLL Gowda<br />

International chickpea Helicoverpa resistance screening nursery<br />

Rationale<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of chickpea. Therefore, there<br />

is a need to develop insect resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore,<br />

we evaluated the chickpea nurseries for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during the 2009/10<br />

postrainy season to identify high yielding lines with resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

The international Helicoverpa resistance screening nursery (30 lines) was evaluated for resistance to H.<br />

armigera under field conditions, and also distributed to several NARS for evaluation. There were three<br />

replications in a randomized complete block design. Observations were recorded on H. armigera<br />

damage on a 1 to 9 scale (1 = 80% leaf area/pods<br />

damaged), larval density, and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

At <strong>ICRISAT</strong> – Patancheru, the genotypes ICC 5383, ICC 10393, ICC 1356, ICC 637, ICC 14402, ICC<br />

14831, ICCV 07113, ICCV 07106, ICCV 07104, ICCV 07105, ICCVX 960183-4, ICCVX 960183-28,<br />

ICCVX 960183-72, and ICCV 10 had low H. armigera incidence, and suffered low damage during the<br />

vegetative and/or flowering stage. Of these, ICCV 07106, ICCV 07104, ICCV 07105, and ICCV 10<br />

showed a yield potential of >1.5 tonnes ha -1 compared to 0.5 tonnes ha -1 of ICC 3137 under<br />

unprotected conditions.<br />

At ARS, Gulbarga, the genotypes ICC 867, ICC 4533, ICC 14402, EC 583311, EC 583318, ICCV<br />

07104, ICC 506EB, and ICC 4973 had low H. armigera incidence, and suffered low damage during the<br />

vegetative and/or flowering stage. Some of these varieties exhibited high yield potential under<br />

268


unprotected conditions. At ARS, Tandur, the genotypes EC 583260, EC 583264, ICC 1356, ICC 4958,<br />

ICC 5383, ICCV07106, ICCV 07104, ICCVX 960183-69, ICCX 960183-28, ICCX 960183-72, and<br />

ICCX 960186-1 had low H. armigera incidence, and suffered low damage during the vegetative and/or<br />

flowering stage, and also good yield potential under unprotected conditions.<br />

Conclusions<br />

High yielding lines with resistance/tolerance to pod borer can be used in chickpea improvement<br />

programs by the NARS.<br />

HC Sharma, JB Gopali, CLL Gowda and PM Gaur<br />

Milestone: 5-10 lines with resistance to both FW and Helicoverpa identified (CLLG/HCS/SP) 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera) is the major pest causing damage to chickpea at all stages of growth.<br />

Damage is severe when pest attacks the crop during flowering and pod formation. As part of the<br />

resistance breeding program, we have identified a few germplasm and breeding lines that are less<br />

susceptible to Helicoverpa damage.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

We made 70 crosses involving less susceptible lines and agronomically superior varieties/lines. This<br />

included 21 desi x desi type crosses, 15 kabuli x kabuli crosses, 11 crosses involving advanced<br />

breeding lines and 23 four-way crosses (F 1 xF 1 ).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Out of 61 F 2 populations grown, we harvested 27 bulks that survived wilt incidence. There were no<br />

wilt resistant plants in the remaining F 2 populations. From among the 56 F 3 populations grown, we<br />

selected 485 single plants for resistance to Helicoverpa damage. We also selected 1003 single plants<br />

from the 119 F 4 bulks grown during this season.<br />

We evaluated 15 progenies in Advanced Yield Trial (AYT) and 24 progenies in Preliminary Yield<br />

Trial (PYT), in replicated trials (3 replications). From these trials, we selected 8 lines from AYT and 12<br />

lines from PYT for further evaluation.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Single plants resistant to Helicoverpa were selected and also selected lines from AYTs and PYTs for<br />

further evaluation.<br />

CLL Gowda and PM Gaur<br />

Milestone: Physico-chemical mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa identified and nature of<br />

inheritance studied 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Resistance to pod borer, H. armigera is conditioned by acid exudates in the leaves and pods. The<br />

present studies were undertaken to study the variation in organic acid profiles at different stages of<br />

plant growth in relation to expression of resistance to the pod borer, H. armigera.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

HPLC profiles of four chickpea genotypes (ICC 506EB, ICCV 10, C 235, and L 550), which had<br />

shown different levels of resistance to the pod borer, H. armigera, were studied in relation to<br />

expression of resistance to this insect. Analysis was carried out by using Atlantis dC-18 column (4.6 x<br />

250 mm, 5 μm). Chromatographic separation was done using mobile phase (potassium phosphate<br />

buffer, pH 2.5) with a flow rate 0.8 ml min -1 , and the injected volume was 20 μl with 20 min run time<br />

per sample. The amounts of the organic acids were estimated from the standard curves prepared with<br />

the standards. Expression of resistance to H. armigera was measured by using detached leaf assay.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Highest numbers of peaks (11) were observed in C 235 at the podding stage, and lowest (6) numbers of<br />

peaks were observed in ICC 506, ICCV 10, and L 550 at the vegetative stage, and L 550 at the podding<br />

stage. At vegetative and flowering stages ICC 506 had the highest amount of oxalic acid on dry weight<br />

and leaf area basis. At the podding stage, ICCV 10 had the highest amount of oxalic acid on dry weight<br />

269


asis, whereas on leaf area basis, ICC 506 had the highest amount. On dry weight basis, ICCV 10 had<br />

the highest amount of malic acid at the vegetative, flowering, and podding stages. On leaf area basis,<br />

ICCV 10 had the highest amount of malic acid at the vegetative stage, whereas C 235 had the highest<br />

amount of malic acid at the flowering and podding stages. Fumaric and citric acids were recorded at the<br />

podding stage only. The genotype C 235 had highest amounts of fumaric and citric acids. There was no<br />

citric acid in ICC 506. Leaf feeding and larval weights were lowest on ICC 506EB, followed by ICCV<br />

10, C 235, and L 550.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Variation in expression of resistance to pod borer, H. armigera is influenced by the profiles of organic<br />

acids in the leaf/pod exudates.<br />

HC Sharma<br />

Output target 6.1.2 CP: Molecular markers for AB, BGM, and Helicoverpa resistance identified<br />

in chickpea<br />

Activity 6.1.2.1 CP: Mapping and marker-assisted breeding for diseases and insect resistance in<br />

chickpea<br />

Milestone: QTLs for Helicoverpa resistance identified from C. arietinum x C. reticulatum RIL<br />

population 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Pod borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) is a highly devastating insect pest of chickpea worldwide.<br />

Development of insect resistance cultivars will improve the chickpea productivity and livelihoods of<br />

farmers. Marker-assisted selection would improve precession and efficiency of breeding for<br />

Helicoverpa resistance.<br />

(A) Identification of QTL for Helicoverpa resistance from a RIL population derived from C.<br />

arietinum x C. reticulatum cross<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The genotyping data of 1589 mapped markers (generated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and data procured from<br />

collaborators) on mapping population ICC 4958 × PI 489777 was used together with phenotyping data<br />

collected for two years (2007-2008 and 2008-2009) for identification of QTLs for insect resistance.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

QTL analysis has provided several QTLs based on the phenotypic data obtained during 2007-08.<br />

Details about these QTLs are provided in Table 6.3. Detailed analysis of these QTL results is in<br />

progress.<br />

Table 6.3: Summary on identification of Helicoverpa resistance QTLs during 2007-08 and 2008-<br />

09 based on phenotyping using detached leaf assay and field evaluation<br />

Trait<br />

QTL 2007 2008 Common<br />

Name<br />

No.<br />

of<br />

QTLs<br />

Phenotypic<br />

variance<br />

(%)<br />

No. of<br />

QTLs<br />

Phenotypic<br />

variance<br />

(%)<br />

QTLs<br />

Detached leaf assay<br />

Leaf Damage rating (vegetative) LDV 1 11.5 - -<br />

Leaf Damage rating (flowering) LDF 3 8-17.9 4 5.03-5.18 3 (8-11.5)<br />

Unit larval vegetative wt (mg) ULV 2 6.3-9.5 4 5.01-6.38 2 (5-9.5)<br />

Unit larval flowering wt (mg) ULF 4 9.1-13.7 3 5-8.7 3 (5-13)<br />

Damage rate DR - - 2 11-14.3<br />

Larval Survival (%) LS - - 2 14-23<br />

Unit Larval Weight ULW - - 4 9-20.4<br />

Field evaluation<br />

270


Damage rating vegetative DRV 4 7-14.1 3 5-10.8 -<br />

Helicoverpa larvae/10 plants HLP 4 8-17.7 4 5.0-54.2 3 (5-9.5)<br />

Days to First flower DfF - - 2 10.8-14<br />

Days to 50% flower DFF - - 2 11-15.5<br />

No of larvae vegetative NLV - - 2 8-43<br />

No of larvae flowering NLF - - 2 5.1-5.3<br />

Damaging rating at vegetative DRV - - 3 5.1-10.4<br />

Damaged pods (%) DP - - 5 5.0-5.8<br />

Conclusions<br />

Although several QTLs were identified, it was not possible to identify the major effect and consistent<br />

QTLs that can be used in molecular breeding.<br />

Rajeev Varshney, HC Sharma, PM Gaur and Mahendar Thudi<br />

(2) Evaluation of intraspecific mapping population (ICC 506EB x Vijay) for resistance to pod<br />

borer, Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Intraspecific mapping population derivatives derived from ICC 506EB x Vijay (200 lines) along with<br />

resistant and susceptible checks, and the two parents were evaluated for resistance to pod borer, H.<br />

armigera under natural infestation in the field. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, leaf and pod<br />

damage visually on a 1 to 9 scale, egg and larval numbers per 5 plants, pod damage, wilt incidence, and<br />

grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The RIL numbers 6, 19, 20, 24, 26, 28, 30, 39, 44, 48, 49, 51, 53, 56, 71, 76, 83, 84, 101, 104, 113,<br />

131, 140, 145, 150, 161, 166, 170, 178, 183, 184, 185, 192, and 196 had damage ratings at the<br />

vegetative and maturity stages comparable to or lower than the resistant check, ICC, 506EB, and /or<br />

exhibited high yield potential. These lines also had lower egg and/or larval population than on the<br />

susceptible check, ICC 3137.<br />

(3) Evaluation of interspecific (C. arietinum x C. reticulatum) derivatives for resistance to pod<br />

borer, Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Rationale<br />

The levels of resistance to the pod borer, H. armigera in the cultivated germplasm are low to moderate,<br />

and therefore, we evaluated the interspecific derivatives derived from ICC 4958 (Cicer arietinum) x PI<br />

489777 (Cicer reticulatum) (128 lines for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera identify lines with high<br />

levels of resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Interspecific derivatives derived from ICC 4958 (Cicer arietinum) x PI 489777 (Cicer reticulatum)<br />

(128 lines along with resistant – ICC 506EB, susceptible - ICC 3137, commercial – ICCC 37, local –<br />

Annigeri, and Kabuli – L 550 checks, along with the two parents) were evaluated for resistance to pod<br />

borer, H. armigera under natural infestation in the field. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, leaf<br />

and pod damage visually on a 1 to 9 scale, egg and larval numbers per 5 plants, pod damage, wilt<br />

incidence, and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Among the early-duration lines, EC 583250, EC 583255, EC 583260, EC 583265, EC 583267, EC<br />

583271, EC 583285, EC 583313, EC 583316, EC 583331, EC 583356, and EC 593337 had damage<br />

ratings at the vegetative and maturity stages comparable to or lower than the resistant check, ICC 506.<br />

These lines also had lower egg and/or larval population than on the susceptible check, ICC 3137.<br />

Among the medium-duration lines, EC 583249, EC 583266, EC 583304, EC 583318, EC 583321, EC<br />

583339, EC 583347, EC 583348, EC 583350, EC 583353, and EC 593354 had damage ratings at the<br />

vegetative and maturity stages comparable to or lower than the resistant check, ICC 506. These lines<br />

also had lower egg and/or larval population than on the susceptible check, ICC 3137. Among the long-<br />

271


duration progenies, EC 583253, EC 583282, EC 583304, EC 583298, EC 583309, EC 583319, EC<br />

583325, EC 583327, EC 583350, EC 583353, and EC 593376 had damage ratings at the vegetative and<br />

maturity stages comparable to or lower than the resistant check, ICC 506, and had lower egg and/or<br />

larval population than on the susceptible check, ICC 3137.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Interspecific derivatives with resistance levels comparable to the resistance check, ICC 506, good grain characteristics, and<br />

high yield potential will be useful for chickpea improvement in the national program.<br />

HC Sharma and PM Gaur<br />

Output target 6.1.3 CP: Interspecific derivatives with resistance to AB, BGM and Helicoverpa<br />

developed<br />

Activity 6.1.3.1 CP: Inter-specific derivatives with resistance to Helicoverpa and BGM generated<br />

using wild Cicer from different gene pools<br />

Milestone: Wild relatives with diverse mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa identified 2009<br />

Evaluation of wild relatives of chickpea for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Rationale<br />

The levels of resistance to the pod borer, H. armigera in the cultivated germplasm are low to moderate,<br />

and therefore, we evaluated the wild relatives of chickpea for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera<br />

identify accessions with high levels, and diverse mechanisms of resistance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Sixteen wild relatives of chickpea were evaluated for resistance to H. armigera along with resistant<br />

(ICC 506) and susceptible (ICCC 37, ICC 3137, and L 550) checks under field conditions. There were<br />

three replications in a completely randomized design.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The accessions IG 69979, IG 70006, IG 7018, PI 51063, and PI569217 had low incidence of H.<br />

armigera, and also suffered low leaf and pod damage. In the detached leaf assay, the lines IG 69979,<br />

IG 7012, IG 72933, PI 568217, and PI 599066 exhibited high levels of antibiosis to pod borer, H.<br />

armigera.<br />

Fifteen accessions of perennial wild relatives of chickpea were also evaluated for resistance to H.<br />

armigera using detached leaf assay at the Regional Research Station, Himachal Agricultural<br />

University, Kukumseri, Himachal Pradesh, India. Data were recorded on leaf feeding, larval survival<br />

after five days, and the larval weights. Leaf damage rating, larval survival were lower on PI 599087, PI<br />

599083, and PI 599085 as compared to the insects fed on the leaves of PI 599089.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Wild relatives of chickpea showed high levels of antibiosis to the pod borer, H. armigera, and hence,<br />

there is a good possibility on diversifying the basis of resistance to pod borer by introgressing the<br />

resistance genes into the cultigen through wide hybridization.<br />

HC Sharma and Sanjay Sharma<br />

Milestone: Interspecific derivatives (10) with enhanced resistance to AB, BGM, and Helicoverpa<br />

identified and made available to partners <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Chickpea is prone to pod borer attach with low levels of resistance in cultivated germplasm. Wild<br />

relatives of chickpea are known to have multiple disease and pest resistance.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Interspecific derivatives derived from C. reticulatum, after selecting for pod borer resistance at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> farm were screening at different chickpea growing sites in India.<br />

272


Results and Discussion<br />

Advance generation derivatives derived from C. reticulatum were screened for H. armigera at five<br />

different locations including <strong>ICRISAT</strong> farm. In Akola and Tandur damage due to the insect was low<br />

compared to the damage ratings at Dharwad and Jabalpur. Nevertheless some lines showed low<br />

damage. Amongst these, 20 lines were screened for ascochyta blight under <strong>ICRISAT</strong> glasshouse<br />

conditions and one line showed resistance to the disease.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Moderate levels of resistance to pod borers can be transferred from Cicer species. Since all the lines<br />

were not screened for AB and none to BGM, screening for these two diseases should be taken in their<br />

hotspot locations.<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, HC Sharma, PM Gaur, S Pande<br />

Output target 6.1.4 CP: Promising transgenic events of chickpea with proven resistance to<br />

Helicoverpa available for introgression in locally adapted germplasm<br />

Activity 6.1.4.1 CP: Develop transgenic events of chickpea for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera<br />

and evaluate their performance under contained greenhouse and field conditions<br />

Milestone: One or two transgenic events of chickpea identified and used for introgression into locally<br />

adapted genotypes and the progeny characterized and evaluated 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Despite the efforts made over the past four decades to breed for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera in<br />

chickpea, the progress has been less than satisfactory in many cases. The resistance to Helicoverpa in<br />

chickpea germplasm has been so far found to be low to moderate, and therefore it is important to<br />

evaluate the use of biotechnology to provide alternative, and hopefully higher, levels of resistance. An<br />

important strategy for improving the resistance of chickpea to Helicoverpa can be the use of genetic<br />

transformation to introduce the insecticidal protein genes from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)<br />

and other heterologous sources.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A focused approach was been initiated to engineer resistance to H. armigera by using cry1Ac, Cry2Aa<br />

and Cry1Aabc genes through Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of chickpea.<br />

For efficient expression of cry genes, six different gene constructs with different promoters were used.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

A total of 200 primary transgenic events were produced in chickpea by using the cry2Aa (64 events)<br />

and the cry2A (95 events) and the cryAbc (22 events) genes through Agrobacterium tumefaciensmediated<br />

genetic transformation of a popular chickpea cultivar, C 235. Molecular characterization<br />

using PCR was performed for all the plants carrying the cry2A and cry2Aa genes to confirm their<br />

presence. Out of 159 independent putative transgenic events tested, 90 events showed the integration of<br />

the Bt gene. ELISA was also carried out for PCR confirmed transgenic events carrying the cry2Aa and<br />

cry2A genes for confirmation of protein expression where 14 transgenic events (8 with cry2A and 6<br />

with cry2Aa) showed positive expression in ELISA analysis. Plants carrying the cry1Abc are being<br />

screened using PCR analysis to confirm the gene of interest and ELISA will be carried out to check the<br />

expression of inserted genes. The selected transgenic events that previously showed some level of<br />

resistance to Helicoverpa in previous insect bioassays results were advanced to further generations for<br />

further phenotypic evaluations.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Based on detached leaf bioassays for 11 events of chickpea carrying different cry genes,7 events with<br />

superior performance have been advanced to further generations for subsequent evaluations.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur, HC Sharma<br />

273


Non-hyrbid Pigeonpea<br />

Output target 6.1.1 PP: About 5-6 pigeonpea varieties with stable resistance to Fusarium wilt,<br />

sterility mosaic and Helicoverpa made available to NARS<br />

Activity 6.1.1.1 PP: About 15 new genetically diverse germplasm sources/breeding lines resistant to<br />

wilt and sterility mosaic diseases identified<br />

Milestones 6.1.1.1.1 25-30 pigeonpea lines tested multilocationally for their stability to wilt and<br />

sterility mosaic resistance in India - Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

To identify stable and broad based resistance to fusarium wilt (FW) and sterility mosaic disease<br />

(SMD), pigeonpea lines having resistance to FW and SMD identified at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru were<br />

evaluated for resistance to both the diseases at different locations.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Pigeonpea wilt and sterility mosaic disease nursery (PWSMDN) material was evaluated at different<br />

locations. It consisted of 30 entries, 28 entries were resistant to both wilt and SMD and the other two<br />

were wilt susceptible (ICP 2376) and SMD susceptible (ICP 8863) checks. Additionally, two local<br />

susceptible checks, one for wilt and the other for SMD were also included from the participating<br />

location. In most of the locations the nursery was planted in wilt sick plot for wilt and for SMD,<br />

standard leaf staple technique was followed for SMD development.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Of the 28 entries, five entries (ICPL’s 20094, 20110, 20116, 20120 and 20134) were found<br />

asymptomatic/ resistant (


• Resistant genetic stock for wilt: Three entries (BSMR 853, IPA 16F and IPA 204) were found<br />

combined resistance (>10%) to FW and SMD. Two entries were found asymptomatic and<br />

resistant to FW. Four entries were found asymptomatic and two entries resistant to SMD.<br />

• Multilocational evaluation of promising entries for wilt: Combined resistance (10%) to<br />

both FW and SMD. Two entries showed resistant reaction to FW and 5 entries showed resistant<br />

reaction (


Results and Discussion<br />

a. Collection and purification of isolates of Phytophthora drechsleri f. sp. cajani (Pdc):<br />

Pathogenicity test and Koch’s postulates were proved using a susceptible cultivar ICP 7119<br />

following soil drench inoculation technique under greenhouse conditions at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-<br />

Patancheru. Single sporangial cultures were obtained following standardized mycological<br />

techniques and maintained in V8 juice agar slants at 4 o C in refrigerator for further studies.<br />

b. Morphological characters: The isolates varied in their cultural and morphological<br />

characters. The colony color varied from creamy white to light pink. The chlamydospores and<br />

sporangia were produced at 12-15 days after inoculation.<br />

c. Virulence of P. drechsleri f. sp. cajani: Two inoculation methods (spray inoculation and soil<br />

drench) were followed for this study. The soil drench inoculation method at 25 o C showed<br />

highest percent disease incidence (>80%) within 8-10 days after inoculation. However, spray<br />

inoculation method showed blight symptoms on leaves at 15 o C.<br />

Suresh Pande and Mamta Sharma<br />

(D) Variety Re-constitution Program<br />

Rationale<br />

To reconstitute pureline of at least 5 varieties of pigeonpea.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

In <strong>2010</strong>, the following lines were selected to reconstitute pureline varieties: Asha (ICPL 87119), Maruti<br />

(ICP 8863), Lakshmi (ICPL 85063), VL Arhar-1 (ICPL 88039), and Kamica (ICP 7035).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Plants were evaluated for disease resistance under field and glasshouse conditions. Single plant<br />

progenies of these selected plants were evaluated during <strong>2010</strong> rainy season (Asha - 2 progenies with 50<br />

entries; Maruti - 2 progenies with 30 entries; Lakshmi - 6 progenies; VL Arhar 1 - 15 progenies with 45<br />

entries; and Kamica - 3 progenies with 11 entries.<br />

KB Saxena, RK Srivastava, MG Mula<br />

Activity 6.1.1.2 PP: Genetically diverse germplasm / breeding lines with resistance to Helicoverpa<br />

identified<br />

Milestone: At least 10 germplasm/breeding lines with resistance to Helicoverpa identified and made<br />

available to partners 2009<br />

Evaluation of pigeonpea germplasm for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera:<br />

Rationale<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of pigeonpea. Chemical<br />

control of H. armigera is costly, and also leads to development of resistance to insecticides. There is a<br />

need to develop insect resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore, we<br />

evaluated the pigeonpea reference collection (305 lines) for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during<br />

the 2009/10 postrainy season to identify sources of resistance to this pest for use in pigeonpea<br />

improvement.<br />

Material and Methods:<br />

We evaluated 146 pigeonpea germplasm accessions for resistance to H. armigera along with resistant<br />

and susceptible checks under field conditions. There were three replications in a randomized complete<br />

block design. Data were recorded on pod borer damage on a 1 to 9 rating scale (1 = 80% pods damaged and pods<br />

present only on a few branches), and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The ICP numbers 995, 1071, 1279, 1356, 4307, 4515, 4903, 5142, 6845, 6859, 6929, 7076, 7507,<br />

8012, 8227, 8700, 8757, 8793, 8949, 9045, 9691, 10094, 10228, 10559, 11320, 11321, 11690, 11823,<br />

12298, 12515, 13167, 134131, 13579, 13662, 13884, 14094, 14120, 14545, and 14722 exhibited<br />

moderate levels of resistance to pod borer, H. armigera. Although the H. armigera damage to the first<br />

flush was very high (DR 6 – 9), these lines also showed good yield potential (>10 q ha -1 ) under<br />

276


unprotected conditions, and can be used for developing pigeonpea varieties with less susceptibility to<br />

H. armigera.<br />

Three sets of 12, 50, and 31 lines belonging to short-, medium-, and long-duration maturity groups,<br />

respectively, were also evaluated for resistance to H. armigera under natural infestation in the field.<br />

There were three replications in a randomized complete block design. Data were recorded on<br />

agronomic traits, recovery resistance score on a 1 to 9 damage rating scale (1 = 80% pods damaged and pods present<br />

only on a few branches), wilt incidence, and grain yield.<br />

The pod borer damage (both H. armigera and M. vitrata) in the early-maturity group was very high<br />

(DR 7 – 9). The genotypes ICP 7203-1, ICPL 187-1, and ENT 11 yielded more (5.0 – 7.9 q ha -1 ) than<br />

the commercial check, UPAS 120 (3.2 q ha -1 ). Among the medium duration lines ICP 2933, ICP 5825,<br />

ICP7337-2, ICPB 2407B, ICPR 2899, ICPR 2913, ICPHaRL 4985-10, ICPHaRL 4985-1, LRG 41, and<br />

eight selections from the interspecific derivatives exhibited moderate levels of resistance to pod borers,<br />

and also had yield potential comparable to ICPL 332WR and/or ICPL 87119. In the long-duration<br />

group, the genotypes ICP 3616, ICP 5390, ICP 8102, ICP 81027-E3-6EB, ICP 8595-E1-EB, ICP<br />

12510, ICP 12510-1, ICPB 2030, ICPR 2925, and NP (WR)-15 exhibited recovery resistance and yield<br />

levels better than the resistant, ICPL 332WR and commercial checks, ICPL 87119.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Genotypes (ICP 2933, ICP 5825, ICPHaRL 4985-10, ICPHaRL 4985-1, and LRG 41) showing stable<br />

resistance to pod borer, H. armigera can be used in pigeonpea improvement programs.<br />

HC Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Relative susceptibility of pigeonpea hybrids and their parents to Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Rationale<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of pigeonpea. Therefore, there<br />

is a need to develop insect resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore,<br />

we evaluated the hybrid parents for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during the 2009/10 postrainy<br />

season to identify high yielding lines with resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Six hybrids along with two pairs of maintainer/male-sterile lines, 9 varieties, and nine restorer lines in<br />

the short duration group; and 10 hybrids, three pairs of A/B lines, and 10 restorer lines, along with four<br />

checks were evaluated for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera under field conditions. There were three<br />

replications in a randomized complete block design. Data were recorded on H. armigera damage,<br />

recovery and overall resistance scores visually, pod damage, egg and larval numbers per 5<br />

inflorescences, and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Damage by H. armigera in all the hybrids in the first flush was very high, and therefore recovery<br />

resistance scores were recorded at maturity. In the short-duration group, the recovery resistance scores<br />

ranged from 7.0 to 9.0, and the genotypes PPE 54-2, ICPL 187-1, ICPL 98008, ICPR 2363, ICPR<br />

2431, and ENT 11 showed moderate levels of recovery resistance, and yield potential 3.5 – 7.2 q ha -1 as<br />

compared to 3.1 ha -1 of ICPL 87. These genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H.<br />

armigera. None of the hybrids exhibited tolerance to pod borer damage. In the medium-duration group,<br />

the recovery resistance scores ranged from 5.7 to 8.3, and the genotypes ICPH 2740, ICPH 3461, ICPH<br />

3762, ICPR 2671, ICPR 2740, and ICPL 3762 showed moderate levels of recovery resistance, and<br />

yield potential > 7.0 q ha -1 as compared to 7.7 q ha -1 of ICPL 87119. These genotypes also had lower<br />

numbers of eggs and larvae of H. armigera.<br />

HC Sharma, KB Saxena and RK Srivastava<br />

International pigeonpea Helicoverpa armigera resistance screening nursery<br />

Twenty-five genotypes, including the resistant and susceptible checks, were evaluated for resistance to<br />

pod borer, H. armigera under field conditions. There were three replications in a randomized complete<br />

block design. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, H. armigera damage, and recovery resistance,<br />

pod damage, egg and larval numbers per 5 inflorescences, and grain yield. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru,<br />

277


damage by H. armigera in the first flush was very high, and therefore, recovery resistance scores were<br />

recorded at maturity.<br />

The recovery resistance scores ranged from 4.7 to 9.0, and the genotypes ICP 10531, ICP 13198, ICP<br />

13212, ICPHaRL 4985-10, ICPHaRL 4989-7, ICPL 20062, ENT 11, and ICPL 332WR showed<br />

moderate levels of recovery resistance, and yield potential 5.5 – 5.9 q ha -1 as compared to 10.3 q ha -1 of<br />

ICPL 87119. These genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H. armigera.<br />

At ARS, Gulbarga, pod borer resistance scores ranged from 3.0 to 6.0 and pod damage from 26.49 –<br />

51.14%, and the genotypes ICP 10531, ICPHaRL 4979-2, ICPHaRL 49785-4, ICPHaRL 4985-10,<br />

ICPHaRL 4989-7, ICPL 85063,ICPL 20062, ICPL 97253, Maruti, and ICPL 332WR showed moderate<br />

levels of resistance, and yield potential >300 g per plant. Some of these genotypes also had lower<br />

numbers of eggs and larvae of H. armigera. At ARS, Tandur, pod damage ranged from 2.52 – 22.26%,<br />

and the genotypes ENT 11, ICPHaRL 4978-5, ICPHaRL 49785-1, ICPHaRL 4989-7, ICP 13918, ICPL<br />

909, ICPL 97253, LRG 41, and Nallakandi showed moderate levels of resistance, and yield potential<br />

>60 g per plant. Some of these genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H. armigera.<br />

HC Sharma and GP Gopali<br />

Evaluation of wilt-resistant lines for resistance to pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Rationale<br />

The pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the most damaging pests of pigeonpea. Therefore, there<br />

is a need to develop insect resistant cultivars to reduce the extent of losses due to this pest. Therefore,<br />

we evaluated the hybrid parents for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera during the 2009/10 postrainy<br />

season to identify high yielding lines with resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Two sets of wilt-resistant lines (30 medium-duration and 32 long duration) were evaluated for<br />

resistance to H. armigera along with resistant, ICPL 332WR and susceptible, ICPL 871119 checks<br />

under field conditions. There were three replications in a randomized complete block design. Data were<br />

recorded on agronomic traits, recovery resistance score on a 1 to 9 damage rating scale (1 = 80% pods damaged and pods<br />

present only on a few branches), wilt incidence, and grain yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The genotypes ICPL 20094, ICPL 20097, ICPL 20099, ICPL 20110, and ICPL 20120 exhibited<br />

moderate level of recovery resistance (DR 6) and the yield potential comparable to the resistant (ICPL<br />

332WR) and/or commercial check, ICPL 87119. Among the long-duration lines, ICPL 20124, ICPL<br />

20127, ICPL 20136, ICPL 20137, ICPL 94068, ICPL 99044, ICP 6997, ICP 8087, ICP 10957, ICP<br />

11299, ICP 14280, ICP 14290, ICP 14469, and ICP 14514) exhibited moderate level of recovery<br />

resistance (DR 5 - 6) and the yield potential comparable to the resistant (ICPL 332 WR) and/or the<br />

commercial check, ICPL 87119.<br />

HC Sharma and S Pande<br />

Milestone: Mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa in diverse germplasm characterized 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

The levels of resistance to pod borer, H. armigera are low to moderate, and hence, it is important to<br />

identify lines with different mechanisms of resistance to this pest<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Twenty-five genotypes, including the resistant and susceptible checks, were evaluated for resistance to<br />

pod borer, H. armigera under field conditions. There were three replications in a randomized complete<br />

block design. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, H. armigera damage, and recovery resistance,<br />

pod damage, egg and larval numbers per 5 inflorescences, and grain yield. At <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru,<br />

damage by H. armigera in the first flush was very high, and therefore, recovery resistance scores were<br />

recorded at maturity.<br />

278


Results and Discussion<br />

The recovery resistance scores ranged from 4.7 to 9.0, and the genotypes ICP 10531, ICP 13198, ICP<br />

13212, ICPHaRL 4985-10, ICPHaRL 4989-7, ICPL 20062, ENT 11, and ICPL 332WR showed<br />

moderate levels of recovery resistance, and yield potential 5.5 – 5.9 q ha -1 as compared to 10.3 q ha -1 of<br />

ICPL 87119. These genotypes also had lower numbers of eggs and larvae of H. armigera.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Genotypes showing low oviposition and/or low larval numbers, and exhibiting low pod damage and<br />

good recovery resistance can be used for pigeonpea improvement.<br />

HC Sharma<br />

Activities 6.1.1.3 PP: Advanced generation interspecific derivatives with resistance to Helicoverpa<br />

and SMD using wild species from different gene pools developed<br />

Milestone: Physico-chemical mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa in wild relatives of pigeonpea<br />

identified for use in crop improvement 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

The levels of resistance to pod borer, H. armigera in the cultivated germplasm are low to moderate, and hence, it is important<br />

to identify wild relatives of pigeonpea with diverse mechanisms of resistance to this pest.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

We evaluated 29 accessions belonging to 13 species (Cajanus scarabaeoides, C. cajanifolius, C.<br />

sericeus , C. albicans, C. acutifolius, C. lineatus, C. platycarpus, Rhynchosia bracteata, R. aurea,<br />

Dunbaria ferruginea, Flemingia bracteata, F. stricta, Paracalyx scariosa) of wild relatives of<br />

pigeonpea for their proteinase inhibitory activities H. armigera, along with two genotypes of cultivated<br />

pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan (ICPL 87-susceptible check, and ICPL 332 – resistant check), under in vivo<br />

and in vitro inhibitions.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Accession belonging to Cajanus albicans, C. cajanifolius, C. sericeus, F. bracteata, and R. bracteata<br />

showed complete inhibition of HaGPs. Some of the C. scarabaeoides accessions (ICPW 116, 152, 278,<br />

280) exhibited partial inhibition at low concentrations of PIs. All accessions of wild relatives of<br />

pigeonpea showed high to moderate level of inhibition of at pH 7.8, except in ICPL 87 (42%).<br />

Cultivated pigeonpea exhibited monomorphism in terms of TI and CTI isoforms, contrary to the<br />

diverse inhibitory profiles of wild pigeonpeas. Cajanus albicans, C. platycarpus, C. scarabaeoides, and<br />

R. bracteata showed more number of TI and CTI bands. Some of the wild relatives exhubited both TI<br />

and CTI activities. Protease inhibitor isoforms of wild relatives of pigeonpea showed significant<br />

variation in number, band pattern, and protein specificities towards trypsin, chymotrypsin, and HaGPs<br />

as compared to the cultivated pigeonpea.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The PIs from the wild relatives showing potential as intibitors of HaGPs, could be considered as<br />

potential candidates for use in genetic transformation of crops for pest management, including H.<br />

armigera.<br />

HC Sharma and Vonod Prade<br />

Milestone: Ten interspecific derivatives from different Cajanus species belonging to different gene<br />

pools with resistance to Helicoverpa identified for use in pigeonpea improvement 2011<br />

Evaluation of interspecific derivatives of pigeonpea for resistance to Helicoverpa armigera<br />

Rationale<br />

The levels of resistance to the pod borer, H. armigera in the cultivated germplasm are low to moderate,<br />

and therefore, we evaluated the interspecific derivatives for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera to<br />

identify lines with high levels of resistance/tolerance to this pest.<br />

Material and Methods:<br />

Thirty-one bi-parental progenies of ICPW 94 x ICP 28 were evaluated for resistance to pod borer, H.<br />

armigera. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, recovery resistance as explained above, wilt<br />

incidence, and grain yield.<br />

279


Results and Discussion<br />

All the lines were very heavily damaged by M. vitrata and H. armigera, but the progeny nos. 4, 12, 13,<br />

28, and 29 showed moderate yield potential (6.1 – 8.3 q ha -1 compared to 11.9 q ha -1 of ICPL 332 WR).<br />

In another trial 27 selections of the interspecific derivatives from wild relatives of pigeonpea (Cajanus<br />

cajan, ICP 28 x Cajanus scarabaeoides, ICPW 94) along with ICPL 87119 and ICPL 332WR were<br />

evaluated for resistance to pod borer, H. armigera under field conditions. There were three replications<br />

in a RCBD. Data were recorded on agronomic traits, recovery resistance (as the first flush was<br />

completely damaged by Maruca vitrata and H. armigera), wilt, and grain yield. Recovery resistance<br />

scores ranged from 6.0 to 9.0, and the entry nos 5 and 10 showed moderate levels of recovery<br />

resistance, and a yield potential >11.5 q ha -1 . Another set of 10 interspecific derivatives along with<br />

resistant and susceptible checks were also evaluated for pod borer resistance in a replicated trial. The<br />

lines 19-12-17-10, 40-26-6-15-1, and 12-21-3-3-11 exhibited high yield potential and/or low pod borer<br />

damage under un-protected conditions.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The lines 19-12-17-10, 40-26-6-15-1, and 12-21-3-3-11 exhibiting high yield potential and/or low pod<br />

borer damage, will be tested further to confirm their reaction to pod borer.<br />

HC Sharma and HD Upadhyaya<br />

Milestone: New sources of SMD resistance generated through the utilization of wild Cajanus <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Wild relatives of pigeonpea have multiple disease resistance, which pigeonpea will benefit from.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Cajanus acutifolius belonging to secondary gene pool and C. platycarpus belonging to tertiary gene<br />

pool, were used in the crossing program to introgress multiple disease resistance and other traits of<br />

interest<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Advance generation stable derivatives derived from C. platycarpus after four backcrosses and selfing<br />

them a number of times, were screened for a range of insect pests and diseases. The results of the<br />

screening initiative are summarized in Table 6.4. 18 lines selected were resistant to pod borer, pod fly<br />

and bruchids under field conditions. These lines were screened for SMD and FW. Two lines showed<br />

resistance to both FW and SMD. Two lines showed resistance to FW but not to SMD. 13 lines<br />

showed resistance to SMD but not to FW. It can be concluded that it is possible to transfer multiple<br />

pest and disease resistance from C. platycarpus. The lines were screened using DArT markers for the<br />

presence of C. platycarpus genome after four backcrosses and allowing the genomes to recombine after<br />

selfing them a number of times. The results of the study showed the presence of C. platycarpus<br />

genome ranging from 2.0 to 4.8 %. The presence of non-parental alleles presumably due to<br />

recombination ranged from 2.6 to 10.4 %.<br />

Table 6.4: Interspecific derivatives derived from C. platycarpus (tertiary gene pool species) with<br />

multiple disease and pest resistance (including H. armigera).<br />

Line<br />

no. (%) damage (%) damage (%) damage<br />

(%)<br />

damage<br />

(%) damage<br />

Pod damage<br />

Helicoverpa Pod fly Bruchid SMD* FW* Resistant to<br />

1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 60 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

2 0.50 0.00 0.00 12 12 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

3 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 8 HA, PF, Br, FW<br />

4 0.00 0.73 0.00 30 10 HA, PF, Br, FW<br />

5 0.40 0.00 0.00 0 27 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

7 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 16 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

8 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 27 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 25 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

10 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 60 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

280


11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 33 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 73 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

13 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 29 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

14 2.10 0.00 0.00 28 39 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 18 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 81 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

17 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 42 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

18 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 7 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

HA: H. armigera; PF: pod fly; Br: bruchids; SMD: sterility mosaic disease; FW: fusarium wilt<br />

• Percent damage less than 15% were catagorised as resistant<br />

Twenty three advance generation stable derivatives derived from C. acutifolius with multiple insect<br />

resistance including H. armigera, were screened for SMD (Patancheru isolate) and FW (Patancheru<br />

isolate) under field conditions. Amongst these 15 lines were found to be resistant to both SMD and<br />

FW. Four lines were resistant to SMD only and only four lines did not have disease resistance (Table<br />

6.5). This shows that C. acutifolius from the secondary gene pool can be successfully utilized to<br />

introgress multiple disease and pest resistance.<br />

Table 6.5: Interspecific derivatives derived from C. acutifolius (secondary gene pool species) with<br />

multiple disease and pest resistance (including H. armigera)<br />

Line<br />

no<br />

% damage<br />

Helicoverpa<br />

% damage<br />

Pod fly<br />

% damage<br />

Bruchid<br />

% damage<br />

SMD*<br />

% damage<br />

FW*<br />

Resistant to<br />

1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 24 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

3 0.50 0.00 0.00 0 11 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

4 0.50 0.00 0.00 0 89 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

5 1.43 1.43 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

6 0.00 0.67 0.33 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

7 0.00 1.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

9 0.50 0.00 0.00 25 25 HA, PF, Br<br />

10 1.20 0.00 0.60 60 17 HA, PF, Br<br />

11 0.40 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

12 0.57 0.00 0.00 0 17 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

13 0.00 2.58 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 10 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

15 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

16 1.00 0.00 0.00 33 67 HA, PF, Br<br />

17 2.17 0.00 0.00 60 66 HA, PF, Br<br />

18 0.00 0.76 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 20 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 67 HA, PF, Br, SMD<br />

22 0.00 22.20 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 HA, PF, Br, SMD, FW<br />

Conclusions<br />

C. acutifolius from secondary gene pool of pigeonpea and C. platycarpus, from tertiary gene pool, can<br />

be successfully utilized to introgress multiple pest and disease resistance.<br />

Nalini Mallikarjuna, KB Saxena, S Senthilvel, HC Sharma and S Pande<br />

Milestones: 15 new sources of resistance to wilt and sterility mosaic virus identified and made<br />

available to partners<br />

Rationale<br />

To identify resistance sources of pigeonpea lines to FW and SMD.<br />

281


Materials and Methods<br />

Seventy (32 further advanced and 38 advanced breeding lines from breeders material 2007-08), 35 (27<br />

promising lines from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-2008 and eight promising lines from AICRP-Pigeonpea) lines, 48 lines<br />

from Warangal and 136 (including susceptible checks) from All India Coordinated Research Project<br />

(AICRP)- Pigeonpea were evaluated for resistance to FW and SMD under artificial epiphytotic<br />

conditions in pigeonpea wilt and sterility mosaic disease sick plot.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Of the 32 further advanced selections, 26 lines showed combined resistance (>10% incidence) to FW<br />

and SMD. However, 26 lines showed resistant reaction (


Newer constructs with swapped domains are being designed for enhanced expression of the transgenes.<br />

For effective insect resistance, a second generation construct with two different cry genes (cry1Ac and<br />

cry2Aa) is being constructed. Efforts are also being made to add a 300 bp fragment from the native Bt<br />

gene to the synthetic cry1Ac gene for the stable expression. Work is underway to standardize the Q-<br />

PCR for the early screening of the transgenic events for the copy number and zygosity.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Based on the insect bioassays conducted with transgenic pigeonpea events in T1 and T2 generations, 11<br />

transgenic events of pigeonpea have been selected for strip trials under confined field conditions.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur, HC Sharma<br />

Output Target 6.1.3 PP: Twenty medium-long duration vegetable type pigeonpea<br />

germplasm/breeding lines made available<br />

Activity 6.1.3.1 PP: Evaluation and selection of large podded medium – long duration germplasm<br />

and breeding lines for use as vegetable<br />

Milestone: Genetically diverse large seeded vegetable type 10-15 breeding populations for further<br />

selection developed 2011<br />

No report during <strong>2010</strong><br />

Sorghum<br />

Output target 6.1.1 SO: High yielding grain, forage, and sweet sorghum lines with resistance to<br />

insect pests and diseases developed<br />

Activity 6.1.1.1 SO: Selecting high biomass forage and sweet sorghum lines with resistance to shoot<br />

pests and foliar diseases, and grain sorghum with tolerance to grain mold<br />

Milestone: Sweet sorghum lines (5) with high grain yield and shoot fly resistance developed for<br />

postrainy season adaptation <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

It is important to have resistance to shoot fly in sweet sorghum genotypes to enable periodic plantings<br />

in the post rainy season to extend the feedstock supplies to the distilleries.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 48 sweet sorghum advanced varieties and restorers were evaluated during in 2009 post rainy<br />

season in RCBD with IS18551 as a resistant check and Swarna as a susceptible check. 2. A total of 27<br />

sweet sorghum multi-location trial genotypes were evaluated during in 2009 post rainy season in<br />

RCBD with IS 18551 as a resistant check and Swarna as a susceptible check.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In sweet sorghum advanced varieties and restorers trail, dead heart incidence in this trial varied from<br />

17.3 to 97.9 %, Nine out of forty eight advanced verities/restorers shown 17-37 % less shoot fly dead<br />

hearts incidence compared to the susceptible check, Swarna (75.5%). 2. In the multilocation entries<br />

trail (MLT), dead heart incidence varied from 23.3 to 95.2%. Four out of twenty seven multi-location<br />

genotypes i.e., RSSV 167 (23.3 %), RSSV 138 (27.2 %), ICSB 479 %), SP 4511-3 (40.42 %) shown<br />

23-50% less dead heart incidence compared to the susceptible check, Swarna (80.7 %).<br />

Conclusions<br />

The selected entries from both the trails will be further evaluated for confirmation of resistance to shoot<br />

fly and also for other agronomic traits.<br />

P Srinivasa Rao, BVS Reddy and HC Sharma<br />

283


Milestone: Ten sweet-sorghum lines with high biomass and resistance to shoot pests and foliar<br />

diseases developed 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

It is important to have resistance to shoot fly in sweet sorghum genotypes to enable periodic plantings<br />

in the rainy season to extend the feedstock supplies to the distilleries. Resistance to foliar diseases like<br />

anthracnose and leaf blight are important for photosynthates accumulation there by for the ultimate<br />

sugars in the stalks.<br />

Series of trails were conducted for resistance to shoot fly and stem borer as advanced varieties/restorer<br />

trials and multilocation trials during the <strong>2010</strong> rainy season in RCBD with 3 replications using IS 18551<br />

as check for shoot fly resistance screening and IS 2205 for stem borer resistance screening and using<br />

Swarna as susceptible check both for shoot fly and stem borer. Similarly one trial each (RCBD with 3<br />

replications) was conducted for screening the sweet sorghum genotypes for anthracnose resistance and<br />

leaf blight resistance during in rainy season, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Anthracnose disease severity was recorded on a 1−9 scale (1=0 to


Activity 6.1.1.2 SO: Developing QTL mapping populations for economic yield components of<br />

sweet sorghum productivity<br />

Milestone: Four F6 sorghum RIL mapping populations (>350 lines each) available for marker<br />

genotyping and multilocational phenotyping for biomass yield, sugar content, and sugar extraction<br />

characteristics 2009<br />

<strong>Report</strong> yet to be received from CTH<br />

Milestone 6A 1.1.2 SO: Ten high yielding grain mold tolerant sorghum lines developed for rainy<br />

season adaptation 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Grain mold is a major biotic constraint of rainy season sorghum affecting the yield and grain quality. It<br />

is a complex disease with more than 30 fungal spp involved in causing the disease. Use of resistant<br />

cultivars along with other methods of control was found effective for managing grain mold in sorghum.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Grain mold resistance donors in red and white grain backgrounds and identified in the germplasm<br />

accessions were used in the crossing programs. The selected advanced progenies with restorer reaction<br />

were evaluated in replicated trials for their grain mold resistance and agronomic desirability.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

1. Evaluating 43 advanced R-line progenies in RCBD (3 reps) for grain mold resistance in screening<br />

block and for grain yield assessment in breeding block.<br />

Evaluated 24 advanced R-line progenies in RCBD (3 reps) along with four controls (RS 29, CSV 4,<br />

SPV 104, IS 14384) as GMRLT in RCBD (3 reps) for grain mold resistance in screening block and for<br />

grain yield assessment in breeding block in rainy season. The control high grain yielding B- line – RS<br />

29 and CSV 4 respectively showed 2.7 and 1.8 t ha -1 (Trial mean: 2.23; SE+: 0.15) for grain yield in<br />

breeding block and panicle grain mold rating (PGMR) score 2.8 and 3.8 (Trial mean: 3.98; SE+: 0.27)<br />

taken on scale 1 to 9 where 1 = 0 to 75% mold in screening block evaluated under<br />

sprinkler irrigation. Five R-line progenies (SPs 44509-1, 43663-1, 44661-1, 44509-2, and 44511-1)<br />

showed significantly superior grain yield (by 23 to 52%) over CSV 4 ranging from 2.3 to 2.9 t ha -1 with<br />

PGMR score 3.2 to 3.6.<br />

2. Development of F 1 s using new sources (10) for grain mold resistance from germplasm and high<br />

yielding B-lines.<br />

Diverse parents (69) were selected and planted in postrainy season to make new F 1 crosses to develop<br />

grain mold resistant B-lines.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Five R-line progenies (SPs 44509-1, 43663-1, 44661-1, 44509-2, and 44511-1) with significantly<br />

superior grain yield (by 23 to 52%) over CSV 4 ranging from 2.3 to 2.9 t ha -1 with PGMR score 3.2 to<br />

3.6 identified.<br />

A Ashok Kumar, Belum VS Reddy and Rajan Sharma<br />

Activity 6.1.1.3 SO: Developing high yielding sorghum lines with grain mold resistance for rainy<br />

season, and hoot fly resistance for postrainy season<br />

Milestone: Genetically diverse sorghum breeding lines (10) for high yield and large grain size with<br />

resistance to grain mold made available to partners <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Grain mold is a major biotic constraint of rainy season sorghum affecting the yield and grain quality.<br />

Use of resistant cultivars along with other methods of control was found effective for managing grain<br />

mold.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Resistant donors in red and white grain backgrounds identified in the germplasm accessions were used<br />

in the crossing programs. The selected 24 advanced R-line progenies were evaluated in RCBD (3 reps)<br />

285


along with four controls (RS 29, CSV 4, SPV 104, IS 14384) as GMRLT in RCBD (3 reps) for grain<br />

mold resistance in screening block and for grain yield assessment in breeding block in rainy season. .<br />

The data on panicle grain mold rating (PGMR) was collected on 1 to 9 scale where 1 =0 to 75% mold in screening block evaluated under sprinkler irrigation.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The control (high grain yielding) R-line – RS 29 and CSV 4 respectively showed 2.7 and 1.8 t ha -1<br />

(Trial mean: 2.23; SE+: 0.15) for grain yield in breeding block and panicle grain mold rating (PGMR)<br />

score 2.8 and 3.8 (Trial mean: 3.98; SE+: 0.27) taken on. Five R-line progenies (SPs 44509-1, 43663-1,<br />

44661-1, 44509-2, and 44511-1) showed significantly superior grain yield (by 23 to 52%) over CSV 4<br />

ranging from 2.3 to 2.9 t ha -1 with PGMR score 3.2 to 3.6.<br />

Conclusions Five R-line progenies showed significantly superior grain yield (by 23 to 52%) ranging<br />

from 2.3 to 2.9 t ha -1 over control CSV 4 and showed low PGMR score 3.2 to 3.6 indicating their<br />

resistance to grain mold.<br />

A Ashok Kumar, Belum VS Reddy, RP Thakur and Rajan Sharma<br />

Milestone 6.1.1.3: Sorghum lines (5) with large grain and high grain yield and less susceptible to<br />

shoot fly with postrainy season adaptation developed <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum is cultivated in post rainy season over 4.5 M ha in India. The grain fetches premium price and<br />

all most all the harvest is consumed as food. The stalks as fodder are also in great demand as it is of<br />

good quality. Tolerance to drought during terminal growth stage and cold tolerance during vegetative<br />

and grain development growth stages and photo period sensitivity are important. Also, apart from these<br />

adaptation features, if the grain is bold and lustrous fetches higher price. In early stages, tolerance to<br />

shoot fly is also important.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

There are different types of materials under evaluation and selection for the above traits. These are:<br />

Varieties: (1) A total of 57 varieties and two shoot fly susceptible checks (296B, Swarna) were<br />

evaluated in RPVT-1 during 2009 postrainy season for shoot fly resistance. (2) A total of 34 postrainy<br />

elite varieties/R-lines were screened in RPVT 2 for shoot fly resistance in a three-replicated RCBD at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> during 2009 postrainy season along with two checks (IS 18551, a shoot fly resistant check;<br />

Swarna, a shoot fly susceptible check).<br />

Hybrids: During 2009 postrainy season, 28 postrainy hybrids along with two checks (IS 18551: shoot<br />

fly resistant check, Swarna: Shoot fly susceptible check) were screened for shoot fly resistance in a<br />

three-replicated RCBD at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Varieties: (1) Twelve varieties with shoot fly dead hearts ranging from 9 to 20% were numerically<br />

superior for shoot fly resistance compared to the resistant check IS 18551 (SFDH: 21%). (2) Seventeen<br />

varieties from RPVT 2 with SFDH% ranging from 6 to 22% were comparable to the resistant check, IS<br />

18551 (SFDH%: 7.3, lsd: 15.49) (HOPE Project Activity 2.3.11 A). All selected lines have bold grain,<br />

similar to M 35-1.<br />

Hybrids: The hybrids, ICSA 88001 × M 35-1-19 (SFDH: 16%), ICSA 52 x SPV 1411 (SFDH: 24%)<br />

and ICSA 84 × SPV 1411 (SFDH: 30%) were comparable to the check IS 18551 (SFDH: 8%) though<br />

not numerically superior to it and significantly superior to the susceptible check, Swarna (SFDH: 82%)<br />

(HOPE Project Activity 2.4.7).<br />

Conclusions<br />

The selected entries from RPVT-1 and RPVT-2 are being screened in AVT for shoot fly resistance<br />

during <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season. A total of 324 preliminary hybrids produced at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and at MPKV,<br />

Rahuri are being evaluated along with checks in two trials (PHT-1 and PHT-2) at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> for grain<br />

yield, agronomic traits and for shoot fly resistance in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season<br />

Belum VS Reddy, A Ashok Kumar and HC Sharma.<br />

286


Milestone 6.1.1.3.1: Sorghum lines (5) with large grain and high grain yield and less susceptible to<br />

aphids with postrainy season adaptation developed <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

In the recent years, during the dry seasons, rainy and post rainy seasons, aphids incidence and severity<br />

of the pest damage appears to be high. Hence it is important to identify lines with resistance to aphids<br />

in high yielding back ground.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Thirty one sorghum lines comprising of improved breeding lines and germplasm accessions were<br />

multiplied and screened for resistance to sugarcane aphid, M. sacchari during the 2009 postrainy<br />

season (score on 1 to 9 where 1 = no aphids damage and 9 = >90% leaf area damaged). The aphid<br />

damage scores ranged from 1.67 to 5.33,<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

1. Plot No’s. 61510 (ICSP-B-98R Sel-17-2-5-1-1-1), 61523 ((ICSB 508 x ICSB 79)-2-2-1-1-1-2-1-1-2), 61582 ([(((Indian<br />

Synthetic 89-1 x Rs/R 20-682)-5-1-3) x IS 18757) x (((BT~623 x UChV 2) x B lines bulk)-3-1-4-3)]-8-<br />

4-1-1-1-2), 61592 ([((Indian Synthetic 89-2 x Rs/R 20-682)-5-4-2) x PS 30715-1]-1-4-1), IS 40615<br />

(WM 322), and IS 40616 (F6YQ 336), exhibited a leaf damage rating of


Activity 6A.1.3: Selecting for high grain yield and large grain sorghum lines with resistance to<br />

shoot fly and adaptation to post-rainy season<br />

Milestone 6A 1.3.1: Sorghum lines (5) with large grain and high grain yield and less susceptible to<br />

shoot fly with postrainy season adaptation developed <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Postrainy season sorghum is grown on 4.5 m ha in India. Shoot fly is a major biotic constraint affecting<br />

the crop particularly in the early stages of crop growth. Use of resistant cultivars along with other<br />

methods of control was found effective for managing shoot fly in sorghum.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Shoot fly resistance donors identified in the R-lines were crossed with the high yielding R-lines. The<br />

selected advanced progenies were evaluated for shoot fly resistance and agronomic desirability and<br />

were test crossed.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

1. Evaluation of restores in various stages-from new crosses and existing advanced progenies (250) in<br />

replicated trials for agronomic traits, grain traits, seed setting and charcoal rot tolerance and shoot<br />

fly resistance and their seed multiplication.<br />

From RxR crosses, 323 F 5 progenies were evaluated during 2009 postrainy season and based on bold<br />

and lustrous grain apart from grain yield, 414 F 6 progenies were selected and these were<br />

simultaneously testcrossed.<br />

2. Developments of 50 F 1 s using new sources (10) for shoot fly resistance from germplasm and high<br />

yielding B-lines in the postrainy season.<br />

Diverse parents (51) were selected and planted in postrainy season to make new F 1 crosses to develop<br />

shoot fly resistant B-lines.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A total of 414 F 6 progenies were selected (from RxR crosses) based on agronomic desirability and low<br />

shoot fly dead hearts and were test crossed to confirm their restorer reaction.<br />

A Ashok Kumar, Belum VS Reddy and HC Sharma<br />

Activity 6A.1.4: Selecting for high grain yield and grain mold tolerant sorghum lines<br />

Milestone: 6A.1.4.1: Genetically diverse sorghum breeding lines (10) for high yield and large grain<br />

size with resistance grain mold made available to partners. 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Grain mold is a major biotic constraint of rainy season sorghum affecting the yield and grain quality.<br />

Use of resistant cultivars along with other methods of control was found effective for managing grain<br />

mold in sorghum.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Grain mold resistance donors in red and white grain backgrounds identified in the germplasm<br />

accessions were used in the crossing programs. The selected advanced progenies with restorer reaction<br />

were seed multiplied for evaluating them in replicated trials for grain mold and shoot fly resistance and<br />

agronomic desirability.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Screening of the 30 progenies from overall GM and other breeding programs with R- reaction in<br />

screening block in RCBD (3 reps) for developing varieties with resistance to grain mold: Fifty-one R-<br />

line progenies developed in GM/H + programs were seed multiplied for evaluation in a triplicate trial.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Fifty-one R-line progenies developed in GM/H + programs were seed multiplied for evaluating them in<br />

replicated trials for grain mold and shoot fly resistance and agronomic desirability.<br />

A Ashok Kumar, Belum VS Reddy and Rajan Sharma<br />

288


Output C: Annually knowledge of the improvements of the biotechnological and conventional<br />

tools designed to facilitate biofortification and bio-detoxification, breeding improved germplasm<br />

and management strategies (against mycotoxin contamination) of mandate crops and associated<br />

capacity building made available to partners internationally<br />

Output target 6C.1: High yielding and micronutrient dense hybrids/improved<br />

populations/varieties of sorghum and promising transgenic events of groundnut and pigeon pea<br />

with high beta-carotene content available for testing in national trials<br />

Activity 6C.1.3: Selecting sorghum lines for high grain Fe and Zn contents<br />

Milestone 6C 1.3.1: Three varieties with high grain Fe (>40ppm) and Zn (>30 ppm) contents identified<br />

2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Micronutrient malnutrition (especially of Fe and Zn) is a major health problem in the developing<br />

countries. Biofortification is a cost effective and sustainable solution to combat micronutrient<br />

malnutrition. It complements well with the supplementation and chemical fortification methods<br />

currently being employed to address micronutrient malnutrition. Identification of high grain high Fe<br />

and Zn lines from the established R-lines helps in quick development of varieties and hybrids.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 52 established sorghum R-lines were evaluated in triplicate trials over two years for<br />

assessing the grain Fe/Zn contents.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Identification of promising varieties by assessing grain Fe and Zn contents in 50 <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred R-<br />

lines: The mean performance of the 52 <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred sorghum R-lines for two years (2008 and 2009<br />

postrainy seasons) showed that for grain Fe the lines ranged from 25 to 39 ppm with an average of 31<br />

ppm (SE+: 2.23) and grain Zn content from 16 to 28 ppm with an average of 21 ppm (SE+: 1.26). The<br />

controls – PVK 801 and RS 29 respectively had 33 and 27 ppm grain Fe and 21 and 16 ppm grain Zn.<br />

Two R-lines ICSR 113 and ICSR 89035 were significantly superior (by 7% and 9%) to the control -<br />

PVK 801 for grain Fe contents with grain Fe 38 and 39 ppm and significantly superior (by 25% and<br />

16%) for grain Zn contents with grain Zn 28 and 26 ppm. Thirty R-lines were significantly 5 to 33%<br />

superior to the control - RS 29 for grain Fe contents with grain Fe ranging from 30 to 39 ppm and<br />

significantly superior (by 6 and 62%) for grain Zn contents ranging from 18 to 28 ppm. Among the R-<br />

lines ICSR 89035 (Fe 39 ppm and Zn 26 ppm), ICSR 113 (Fe 38 ppm and Zn 28 ppm) and ICSR<br />

89039 (Fe 36 ppm and Zn 23 ppm) showed significantly higher Fe (by 2 to 10%) and Zn (by 2 to 25%)<br />

contents compared to the check PVK 801 (Fe 33 ppm and Zn 21 ppm).<br />

Advancing 85 BC 3 s from the crosses between grain micronutrients (Fe and Zn)-dense germplasm lines<br />

and high yielding breeding lines for R-line/variety development: Advancing the 84 BC 3 s obtained from<br />

the crosses between grain micronutrients (Fe and Zn)-dense germplasm lines and high yielding<br />

breeding lines for R-line/variety development in 2009 postrainy season resulted in the selection of 87<br />

BC 3 s. These were further evaluated for B and R reaction in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season and identified 21<br />

progenies with R-line reaction and are in seed multiplication in <strong>2010</strong> postrainy season for further<br />

evaluation.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Thirty R-lines significantly 5 to 33% superior to the control - RS 29 for grain Fe contents and<br />

significantly superior for grain Zn contents (by 6 and 62%) identified.<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Output targets 6C.5: Effective and eco-friendly IPM technologies designed, evaluated, and<br />

shared for the management of insect pests<br />

Milestone: Compatibility of transgenic crops and insecticides for pest management and their impact on<br />

species diversity assessed 2012<br />

289


Spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus and shoot fly, Atherigona soccata management in sweet<br />

sorghums<br />

Rationale<br />

Sorghum shoot fly, Ahterigona soccata and spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus are important pests of<br />

sorghum, and host plant resistance is one of the important components for the management of these<br />

pests under subsistence farming conditions. Therefore, we evaluated sorghum cultivars with different<br />

levels of resistance to these pests along with insecticides with systemic and contact mode of action for<br />

the management of these pests during the rainy and postrainy seasons.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

One hybrid (ICSA 479 x SSV 84), and three varieties (ICSV 700, ICSV 93046, and SP 4511-1), along<br />

with one shoot fly/stem borer susceptible, but midge-resistant high yielding variety (ICSV 745) were<br />

tested under insecticide treated and untreated conditions. The insecticide treatments included seed<br />

treatment with imidachloprid (4.8 g ai kg -1 seed), Thiamethoxam (3.5 g ai kg -1 seed), fipronil (0.3 g ai<br />

kg -1 seed) granular application of carbofuran granules in the plant whorl (5 to 7 granules per plant at 7<br />

days after seedling emergence for shoot fly, and 3 days after artificial infestation with neonate larvae of<br />

stem borer), and foliar sprays of deltamethrin (12 g ai ha -1 ), methomyl (500 g ai ha 1 ), and endosulfan<br />

(700 g ai ha -1 ). Untreated plots served as a control.<br />

Results:<br />

Carbofuran granules applied in plant whorls were effective in controlling shoot fly, A. soccata damage<br />

on ICSV 700 (12.16% deadhearts) and ICSV 93046 (27.99% deadhearts), and moderately effective on<br />

CSH 22SS, and ICSV 745 (34.14 to 40.43% deadhearts). Under moderate shoot fly infestation during<br />

the 2009/10 postrainy season, seed treatments with thiamethoxam, imidachloprid, fipronil, and sprays<br />

of methomyl, deltamethrin, and endosulfan were as effective as carbofuran granular application in the<br />

plant whorls for shoot fly control on the shoot fly-resistant genotypes ICSV 700 ICSV 93046 and SP<br />

4511-2, but not on the susceptible cultivar, SSV 84.<br />

Granular application of carbofuran granules in the plant whorls three days after artificial infestation,<br />

and foliar sprays of deltamethrin, endosulfan, and methomyl (0.0 to 3.87%, 0.0 to 5.01%, 0.00 to<br />

1.91%, and 0.00% plants with deadhearts, respectively, compared to 3.78 to 9.17% plants with<br />

deadhearts in the untreated control, except in SSV 84, which had 55.29% plants with deadhearts) were<br />

highly effective for controlling the damage by the spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus. Seed treatment<br />

with imidachloprid, thiamethoxam, and fipronil were effective for stem borer control in combination<br />

with ICSV 700, ICSV 93046, and SP 4511-2 having inherent resistance to stem borer. Stalk yield was<br />

>450 q ha -1 in plots of CSH 22SS and ICSV 700 treated with imidachloprid, SSV 84 treated with<br />

carbofuran granules, ICSV 700 treated with deltamethrin sprays, ICSV 93046 plots sprayed with<br />

methomyl, and CSH 22SS and ICSV 93046 sprayed with endosulfan. In untreated control plots,<br />

deadheart incidence was lower in CSH 22SS (7.81%), ICSV 700 (3.78%), ICSV 93046 (4.73%) and SP<br />

4511-2 (9.17%) as compared to 55.29% deadhearts in SSV 84.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Carbofuran granules applied in plant whorls, and sprays of methomyl and deltamethrin, in combination<br />

with cultivars with moderate levels of resistance to shoot fly and stem borer 9ICSV 700 and ICSV<br />

93046), were effective for pest management in sweet sorghums.<br />

HC Sharma<br />

Assessment of the effect of Helicoverpa-resistant cultivars on ETLs<br />

Rationale<br />

Pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the important pests of pigeonpea, and host plant resistance<br />

is an important component for the management of this pest under subsistence farming conditions.<br />

Therefore, we evaluated insecticides with systemic and contact mode of action for the management of<br />

this pest on pigeonpea cultivars ICPL 332WR resistant, and ICP 8863 – susceptible for managing the<br />

pod borer, H. armigera.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Economic thresholds were determined for the resistant (ICPL 332WR) and susceptible (ICP 8863)<br />

varieties of pigeonpea to quantify the contribution of host plant resistance in Helicoverpa management.<br />

290


The plots were sprayed at the 10% flowering, 75% flowering, 50% podding, and dough stages in<br />

different combinations. There were three replications in a randomized complete block design for each<br />

variety. Each plot consisted of 4 rows, 2 m long. The outer two rows were considered as guard rows.<br />

Untreated plots served as a control.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In the plots treated with methomyl + quinalphos + fubendiamide + dimethoate, pod damage by H.<br />

armigera was 4.02 and 3.50% in ICP 8863 compared to 11.21 and 11.13% in ICPL 332WR; while in<br />

the plots treated with Bt + methomyl + spinosad and DDVP + dimethoate, the pod damage was 5.70<br />

and 7.38% in ICP 8863 and 2.10 and 9.70% in ICPL 332WR in tagged branches and randomly selected<br />

plants, respectively. However, grain yield was 24.65 versus 28.91, and 22.11 versus 28.04 q ha -1 , in the<br />

above two treatment schedules, respectively in ICP 8863 and ICPL 332WR. Plots sprayed with NSKE<br />

+ HaNPV + Bt + novaluron suffered heavy damage by the pod borer (16.75 – 41.70% pod damage) and<br />

other insects, and the yields were quite low. The results did provide an indication of the usefulness of<br />

combining resistant varieties with insecticides for management of H. armigera.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Sprays of methomyl + quinalphos + fubendiamide + dimethoate applied on the pod borer resistant<br />

cultivar, ICPL 332WR were effective for pod borer control.<br />

HC Sharma<br />

On-farm evaluation of pigeonpea cultivars with resistance to pod borer on farmers’ fields<br />

Rationale<br />

Pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera is one of the important pests of chickpea and pigeonpea, and host<br />

plant resistance is an important component for the management of this pest. Several lines with low to<br />

moderate levels of resistance to this pest have been developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, which can be exploited for<br />

the management of this pest. Therefore, we evaluated the identified lines on farmers fields for their<br />

performance and adaptation to the major pigeonpea and chickpea growing areas in Andhra Pradesh and<br />

Karnataka.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Seeds of two pigeonpea cultivars (ICPL 332WR - moderately resistant to H. armigera and ICPL 87119<br />

(Asha) -with some degree of recovery resistance were multiplied on a large scale for testing in on-farm<br />

trials. Seeds of four chickpea varieties ICCV 10 (moderately resistant to Helicoverpa), KAK 2 (high<br />

yielding kabuli variety) and ICCC 37 (Kranthi) and JG 11 (high yielding commercial cultivars) were<br />

produced in large amounts for distribution to farmers.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In Ranga Reddy district, Andhra Pradesh, The H. armigera resistant variety ICPL 332WR yielded 500<br />

to 1875 kg ha -1 compared to 550 to 1870 kg ha -1 of Asha – the commercial variety. Grain yield of the<br />

improved Helicoverpa - tolerant varieties ICPHaRL 4985-4, ICPHaRL 4978-4, ICPHaRL 4987-7, PPE<br />

45-2, and ICPL 332WR was 600 – 1250, 650 – 1000, 750 – 1200, 850 – 1350, and 800 – 1400 kg ha -1 ,<br />

respectively.<br />

In Gulbarga district, Karnataka, pod damage in ICPL 332WR was 15.1% compared to 21.0% in Asha;<br />

while grain yield was 10.2 q ha -1 in ICPL 332WR as compared to 13.4 q ha -1 in Asha. Most of the<br />

farmers reported a better control and lower insecticide use in ICPL 332WR than on Asha. Improved<br />

pigeonpea varieties ICPHaRL 4987-7 and PPE 45-2 suffered less pod damage than Asha. The grain<br />

yield of the improved Helicoverpa - tolerant varieties was lower than Asha, but the differences were<br />

non-significant.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The pod borer resistant/tolerant varieties exhibited grain yield potential comparable to the commercial<br />

cultivars, and provided better control of the pod borer in combination with insecticides.<br />

HC Sharma<br />

291


Output 6.2. Annually knowledge of the improvements of the biotechnological and conventional<br />

tools designed to facilitate drought, heat and salinity tolerance breeding and germplasm of<br />

mandate crops and associated capacity building made available to partners internationally.<br />

Groundnut<br />

Output target 6.2.1 GN: Groundnut varieties with tolerance to drought and salinity developed<br />

using conventional and biotechnological approaches<br />

Activity 6.2.1.1 GN: Identify high yielding groundnut varieties tolerant to drought<br />

Milestone: 6-8 dual purpose groundnut varieties with high biomass and improved haulm digestibility<br />

identified and promoted for drought prone areas in Asia 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Dual purpose groundnut-varieties support the crop-livestock productions systems of SAT regions.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

One hundred and fifty two groundnut haulm samples each from Kadiri, Junagadh, Shirgaon<br />

(Ratnagiri), Maharashtra, and samples of IVT-II trial from Jalgaon center (Maharashtra), were received<br />

and handed over to ILRI for fodder quality analysis. The results of fodder quality analysis are awaited<br />

from ILRI.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A dual purpose variety ICGV 91114 was released in Karnataka for cultivation in drought-prone areas<br />

of the state.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: 8 – 10 new advanced lines with resistance to drought tested in South Asian countries 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Drought is the predominant production limiting constraint of groundnut in SAT, hence breeding for<br />

drought tolerance can alleviate the burden to a large extent.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

During 2009/10 postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons, 25 new crosses were made to generate populations<br />

for selection for resistance for drought along with high pod yield in agronomically desirable<br />

backgrounds. ICR 37, ICG 1236, ICGV 07165, ICGV 07173, ICGV 07193, ICGV 07286, ICGV<br />

08141, ICGV 07210, and ICGV 06142, ICR 3, ICR 48 , ICGV 07398, ICGV 08189, ICGV 07395,<br />

ICGV 07193, ICGV 07408, and ICGV 08268 were the drought and A. flavus tolerant breeding lines<br />

used in hybridization program.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Breeding populations: During the 2009/10 postrainy season, 217 bulks and 168 single plants were<br />

selected from 276 F 2 -F11 bulks and 86 plant progenies evaluated under imposed mid-season stress<br />

condition. Of these, 93 in advanced generations were included in replicated yield trials. During the<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 192 bulks and 205 single plants were selected from 124 F 2 - F 13 bulks and 169 plant<br />

progenies that were evaluated under rain-fed conditions.<br />

Yield Trials:<br />

2009 rainy season:<br />

During the 2009 rainy season 127 advanced breeding lines were evaluated for yield and other<br />

agronomic traits in six replicated trials. Elite and Advanced trial were grown under Irrigated and rainfed<br />

conditions.<br />

In an Elite Trial (Virginia) grown under irrigation conditions, ICGV 07404 (4.8±0.29 t ha -1 pod yield,<br />

67% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW, 53% oil content and 21% protein content) significantly outyielded the<br />

highest yielding drought resistance control ICGV 87846 (3.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling outturn, 42<br />

g HSW, 52% oil content and 21% protein content).<br />

292


In an Elite Trial (Spanish) grown under rain-fed conditions, four lines (4.0-3.6±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield)<br />

gave significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding drought resistance control ICGV 02266<br />

(2.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 64% shelling outturn, 38 g HSW). The best entry in the trial was ICGV 07395.<br />

In an Advanced Trial (Virginia) grown under rainfed conditions, three lines (3.9-3.8±0.19 t ha -1 pod<br />

yield) gave significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding drought resistance control ICGV<br />

87846, and the best entry was ICGV 08200.<br />

2009/10 postrainy season:<br />

Same set of 127 lines in six replicated trials were evaluated under full irrigation conditions. Elite and<br />

Advanced trial were sown under imposed stress conditions to compare the performance under both<br />

situations irrigated and imposed stress conditions.<br />

In an Elite Trial (Virginia) grown under stress conditions, two test lines (2.8-2.7±0.18 t ha -1 pod yield)<br />

gave significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding control ICGV 86325. The best entry in<br />

the trial was ICGV 07405 (2.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 69% shelling outturn, 52 g HSW). The same variety<br />

ICGV 07405 (4.5 t ha -1 pod yield, 72% shelling outturn, 60 g HSW, 52% oil content and 20% protein<br />

content) grown under full irrigation conditions significantly out yielded than the highest yielding<br />

control ICGS 76.<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season:<br />

One hundred and fifty nine advanced breeding lines including controls were evaluated for yield and<br />

other agronomic traits in six replicated trials. Elite and Advanced trials were grown under irrigated and<br />

rain-fed conditions. Due to continues and excess rainfall there was no difference in between irrigated<br />

and rain-fed crop growing conditions.<br />

In an Elite Trial (Spanish) grown under irrigation conditions, ICGV 08146 (3.6±0.31 t ha -1 pod yield,<br />

68% shelling outturn, 32 g HSWt) significantly outyielded the highest yielding drought resistance<br />

control ICGV 00350 (2.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 64% shelling outturn, 26 g HSW).<br />

In an Elite Trial (Virginia) grown under rain-fed conditions, two lines (4.1-3.2±0.37 t ha -1 pod yield)<br />

gave significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding drought resistance control ICGV 87846.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A good number of lines for drought tolerance have been developed, evaluated and released for<br />

cultivation in South Asian countries.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: Performance of 3-4 dual-purpose varieties validated on-farm in drought prone areas 2009<br />

Additional report for <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Crop-livestock system is the predominant production system in SAT regions hence development of<br />

dual-purpose groundnut varieties gives and additional advantage of supporting livestock.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Multilocation testing of promising dual purpose varieties evaluation of their performance under drought<br />

stress<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

A dual purpose variety ICGV 91114 was released in Karnataka for cultivation in drought-prone areas<br />

of the state.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A dual purpose variety ICGV 91114 was released in Karnataka for cultivation in drought-prone areas<br />

of the state<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

293


Milestone: Farmer-preferred drought tolerant varieties identified in partner countries <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Farmer-preferred drought tolerant groundnut varieties can alleviate the losses caused by drought stress<br />

as it is a predominant production limiting constraints of groundnut in SAT.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

On-farm trails of superior groundnut varieties are conducted to identify farmer-preferred varieties.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Drought tolerant varieties ICR 48, ICGV 91114, ICGV 00350 and ICGV 87846 were released in India<br />

Conclusions<br />

Drought tolerant varieties ICR 48, ICGV 91114, ICGV 00350 and ICGV 87846 were released in India<br />

SN Nigam, Venu Prasad and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone: Knowledge of inheritance of traits associated with drought tolerance in three crosses<br />

gained and appropriate breeding strategy devised <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Understating the inheritance mechanism of drought enable to design an appropriate breeding strategy to<br />

breed drought tolerant groundnut varieties.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Recombinant inbred mapping populations are development from the crosses ICGS 76 x CSMG 84-1,<br />

ICGS 44 x CSMG 84-1, ICGS 44 x ICGS 76 and TAG 24 X ICGV 86031 and made available for<br />

genotyping and phenotyping.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Parent and different filial generations are now available for the experiment under normal and imposed<br />

drought conditions in the <strong>2010</strong>/11 postrainy season.<br />

The mapping populations developed during the 2009 rainy season, 862 F 8 RILs of 3 crosses (ICGS 76<br />

x CSMG 84-1, 272 RILs; ICGS 44 x CSMG 84-1, 134 RILs; ICGS 44 x ICGS 76, 456 RILs) were<br />

preserved in cold storage for further studies. During <strong>2010</strong> rainy TAG 24 X ICGV 86031 was supplied<br />

for conducting drought mapping studies.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Drought mapping studies during post rainy <strong>2010</strong>/11 under progress<br />

SN Nigam, Venu Prasad and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone: Range of variation for key physiological traits assessed in breeding materials and varieties<br />

from the breeding program <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Breeding for drought tolerance in groundnut is a critical target. Efforts of the past 25 years of research<br />

have concentrated on transpiration efficiency as the most critical trait to contribute to improved<br />

intermittent drought tolerance in groundnut. However, transpiration efficiency has, in most cases, been<br />

evaluated with surrogate traits that may not bear a robust relationship to TE. Therefore, a critical<br />

assessment of traits related to a better adaptation to intermittent drought is needed.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

We have used a lysimetric system, which allows to assess all three components of the Passioura<br />

equation (1977, Y = T x TE x HI) on same plants. We have used 80 genotypes contrasting for seed<br />

yield under drought in the field and have tested them in the lysimeters under differing water regimes.<br />

We are currently continuing this work using a refined list of 60 entries (tolerant/sensitive), this time<br />

based on multiple trials across years and locations.<br />

294


Results and Discussion<br />

What is reported here is only the beginning of an exhaustive assessment of possible traits that are<br />

involved in a better adaptation to intermittent stress in groundnut. Here we have found large genotypic<br />

variation in the quantity of water that can be extracted from the soil profile (several liters). However,<br />

what appeared to be more closely related to pod yield under stress was the amount of water taken<br />

between 45-79 days after stress imposition, a period that corresponds to the pod filling period. There<br />

was a negative significant correlation between pod yield and the water uptake at initial stage (0- 28)<br />

days after stress imposition under three intermittent stresses. These results appear to fully confirmed<br />

our preliminary results with a smaller range of genotypes. The relationship between total water uptake<br />

and root length density (RLD) under water stress, although significant, was a weak relationship,<br />

indicating that, as in the case of chickpea, measuring root morphological attribute has likely little value.<br />

It was also found that under medium and severe stress, pod yield was significantly and negatively<br />

related to the leaf area of plants. This suggests that under an intermittent stress, i.e. a regime of<br />

consecutive cycles of drying and re-wetting, genotypes having a lower leaf area and then using<br />

relatively less water likely suffer less the imposition of the stress than genotypes having larger leaf<br />

area. Under a mild stress, this relationship between pod yield under leaf area was not significant.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Ongoing work to understand the mechanisms of adaptation to water stress in groundnut shows that we<br />

need to go much beyond transpiration efficiency. We are starting to understand how certain pattern of<br />

water usage, in part related to canopy size, but may be also to canopy development and conductance,<br />

are explaining differences in pod yield.<br />

Pasala Ratnakumar and Vincent Vadez<br />

Activity 6.2.1.3 GN: Develop groundnut transgenic events for enhanced tolerance to drought<br />

Milestone: 1 – 2 transgenic DREB events of groundnut available for introgression into locally adapted<br />

germplasm in India <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

In our efforts to improve drought tolerance in groundnut, transgenic events carrying transcription<br />

factor, DREB1A from Arabidopsis thaliana driven by the stress inducible rd29A promoter from A.<br />

thaliana were evaluated for component traits of yield under intermittent drought conditions in a series<br />

of greenhouse experiments as well as event selection trials under confined field condition.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Over 50 transgenic events were previously generated via Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated genetic<br />

transformation with the rd29A:DREB1A carrying binary vector and characterized using PCR, RT-PCR<br />

and Southern blotting techniques. Six transgenic events were selected based on differences in their<br />

transpiration (T) and transpiration efficiency (TE) and yield response in several dry-down experiments<br />

in pot and lysimeteric systems (long and large PVC tubes filled with soil and mimicking a real soil<br />

profile) under greenhouse conditions.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The events were advanced further till T8 generation. These events were comprehensively evaluated<br />

under intermittent stress conditions in separate greenhouse experiments. Our approach was to<br />

thoroughly assess whether transgenic DREB1A event derived from wild type variety JL24, which is<br />

known for its relative drought sensitivity, would have increased values in traits putatively related to a<br />

better yield under stress conditions, prior to assess a yield response per se. Transpiration efficiency<br />

assessment across several experiments indicated consistently higher TE in several events than<br />

untransformed control JL24,. Moreover, these transgenic events showed significantly higher yield<br />

(>60%) than the untransformed controls in greenhouse evaluation under intermittent drought stress.<br />

Two strip trials aimed at event selection under intermittent drought conditions under field conditions<br />

were carried out during the post-rainy season of 2009 and <strong>2010</strong> to reassess and confirm the previous<br />

greenhouse observations we had for the traits related to transpiration and roots and the yield differences<br />

under intermittent DS conditions. Results of 2009 experiment indicated significantly higher pod<br />

biomass and a higher seed numbers in RD19 and RD11 events than both WT JL24 and Null plants. In<br />

addition, RD19 event had a higher seed biomass than WT parent and Null. Though no HI differences<br />

were seen in any of genotypes in WW treatment; events RD19, RD11 and RD2 had a significantly<br />

superior HI than JL24 and Null under drought stress conditions. Following year, another confined field<br />

295


strip trial was carried out during rabi <strong>2010</strong> with all six transgenic events, RD2, RD11, RD12, RD19,<br />

RD20 and RD33 along with JL24, Null and ICGV86031 in lysimeters in the netted facility at RCW17A<br />

field. Consistent with the previous findings, RD11 and RD 33 again showed better seed filling than the<br />

control and rest of the transgenic events under the imposed intermittent DS, reconfirming the previous<br />

results. During the current year, permission was obtained from RCGM to conduct a strip trial under insoil<br />

drought conditions in a confined field during Rabi 2011 to further confirm our observations under<br />

more realistic field drought conditions.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Two transgenic events consistently outperformed than the control and rest of the transgenic events<br />

under the imposed intermittent DS both under greenhouse and confined field conditions. These events<br />

showed better seed filling and a higher harvest index under intermittent drought stress conditions.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone: 15-20 introgressed transgenic lines of groundnut with improved tolerance to water-limiting<br />

conditions evaluated 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Transgenic groundnut event RD2 carrying the transgene rd291A: DREB1A, have been consistent in<br />

showing high TE and better HI under water limiting conditions, hence chosen for the introgression in<br />

drought tolerant elite groundnut genotype ICGV 86031- with inherent multiple disease resistance<br />

attributes for studying the affect on the transgene response on changing the genotypic background.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Common breeding practice of hybridization was used for introgression of the transgene using RD2 as<br />

donor parent and ICGV 86031as the recurrent parent. F1 progeny was screened for the presence of<br />

transgene using PCR techniques. Resultant PCR positive F1 plants were tested for the expression of the<br />

transgene through RT-PCR. The above steps were repeated for all the successive backcrosses carried<br />

out between the PCR positive introgressed progeny with the transgene and the recurrent parent,<br />

ICGV86031 till BC3.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The transgene, DREB1A was introgressed into ICGV 86031, an elite breeding variety of groundnut<br />

through successive back-crossings to study the effect of the genomic background on DREB1A<br />

expression and its possible effect on drought tolerance. The BC3 populations generated so far are being<br />

advanced to further generations for subsequent phenotyping under strip trials. The expression studies<br />

are underway for DREB1A protein for generating the preliminary biosafety data for conducting the<br />

BRL 1 trials in the near future.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Phenotying involving the introgressed progeny with the transgene is to be initiated from the BC3F1<br />

progeny<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and SN Nigam<br />

Activity 6.2.1.4 GN: Marker-assisted breeding for salinity tolerance in groundnut<br />

Milestone: QTLs for salinity tolerance identified 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Soil salinity is an emerging problem in the areas, where groundnut is a major crop and preferred by the<br />

farmers due to its importance as fodder, thus development of salinity tolerant groundnut varieties is an<br />

important research priority to support crop-livestock systems of SAT.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The crosses, ICGV 86156 X ICGV 92196; ICGV 86156 X JL 24; ICGS 76 X ICGV 86699; and ICGS<br />

76 X ICG 4746 were completed in 2009-10 post rainy season<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The crossed seed of the four crosses are raised in <strong>2010</strong> rainy season and subsequently the F 2 ’s are<br />

raised in <strong>2010</strong>-11 post rainy season (now in the field).<br />

296


Conclusions<br />

The crosses ICGV 86156 X JL 24; ICGS 76 X ICGV 86699 will be advanced to develop RILs.<br />

Venu Prasad, SN Nigam and Vincent Vadez<br />

Rationale<br />

Salinity is a problem in some zones where groundnut is cultivated.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Experimental set up to screen for salinity tolerance consists in pots that are buried in the ground, filled<br />

with Alfisol, and then treated with a 0.94 g NaCl per kg of soil, applied in two installments, i.e. half at<br />

sowing and half about 2 weeks later.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The objective of the study was to better understand the characteristics of tolerant genotypes of<br />

groundnut to salinity, which was previously identified as those having a higher pod yield under saline<br />

conditions. A total of 275 accessions of groundnut were screened across two different seasons for their<br />

response to yield under saline condition. Salinity appeared to affect less the number of pods, which<br />

decreased only about 20-40% under salinity, than the pod weight which decreased more than 50%. This<br />

suggested that salinity affected seed development relatively more than pod formation, in agreement<br />

with a lower maturity index and a delay in the days to flower under saline stress. The number of days to<br />

flower had a significant although weak relationship with pod weight under salinity (R 2 = 0.20 and 0.33<br />

in 2006 and 2006-07 respectively), showing that genotype duration had little influence on plant<br />

tolerance to salinity stress. Shoot dry weight was negatively correlated with the total shoot Na + %, but<br />

there was no relationship between pod dry weight and shoot Na + %. A number of crosses were<br />

developed between genotypes that were highly contrasting for salinity tolerance and also showing high<br />

level of polymorphism at the DNA level.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Similar effect of salinity to those in chickpea was found in groundnut. There also, the reproductive<br />

stages are the most sensitive process to the saline treatment.<br />

Vincent Vadez, Namita Srivastava, SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Chickpea<br />

Output target 6.2.1 CP: Biotechnological strategies developed for improving drought avoidance<br />

root traits and salinity tolerance in chickpea<br />

Activity 6.2.1.1 CP: Marker-assisted breeding for drought tolerance in chickpea<br />

Milestone: Assessment of water uptake and related kinetics in contrasting genotypes for root traits<br />

studied using a lysimetric system 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Root traits have been targeted as the major trait contributing to terminal drought tolerance in chickpea<br />

for over three decades. However, the relationship between water extraction and rooting traits is still<br />

understudied and controversial. Taking advantage of the lysimetric system, the top most contrasting<br />

twenty genotypes of chickpea for terminal drought tolerance (based on three years of weather data)<br />

were tested in the lysimeters to assess the relationship between root traits and water extraction and<br />

between these traits and seed yield.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Lysimeters (1.2 m long, 20 cm diameter) were used. Two treatments (fully irrigated conditions and<br />

terminal water stress applied by stopping irrigation at 23 days after sowing) were used with 20<br />

genotypes and 5 replications. Design was a randomized full block design with water regime as main<br />

factor and genotypes as sub-factor.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Twenty chickpea genotypes having similar plant phenology but contrasting for a terminal drought<br />

tolerance index based on yield were used. The pattern of water extraction clearly discriminated tolerant<br />

and sensitive genotypes. Tolerant genotypes had lower water uptake and lower index of stomatal<br />

conductance at vegetative stage than sensitive, while tolerant extracted more water than sensitive<br />

297


genotypes after flowering. The magnitude of the variation in root growth components (depth, length<br />

density, RLD, dry weight, RDW), measured at 5 weeks after stress imposition, did not distinguish<br />

tolerant from sensitive genotypes. The seed yield was not significantly correlated with the root length<br />

density (RLD) in any soil layers. By contrast, this parameter was both negatively related to water<br />

uptake between 23-38 DAS, and positively related to water uptake between 48-61 DAS. Seed yield<br />

decrease under terminal drought was related to reproductive failure rather than defect in seed filling.<br />

Conclusions<br />

In these conditions of terminal drought, the most critical component of terminal drought tolerance in<br />

chickpea was a conservative water use during the early days of the cropping cycle, explained partly by<br />

a lower canopy conductance, which resulted in more water available in the soil profile during<br />

reproduction.<br />

Mainassara Zaman and Vincent Vadez<br />

Milestone: QTLs for drought avoidance root traits validated <strong>2010</strong><br />

This milestone was fully achieved in 2009<br />

Milestone: MABC derived drought tolerant lines available from 2-3 locally adapted cultivars 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Analysis of phenotypic and genotypic data of the ICC 4958 × ICC 1882 population led to the<br />

identification of a ‘hotspot’, which harboured several QTLs for root-related traits and contributed about<br />

30% of phenotypic variation. These results indicated the occurrence of several QTLs for droughtrelated<br />

traits in this region. This genomic region is therefore being introgressed into elite chickpea<br />

cultivars.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Three cultivars (a) ICCV 92318 (kabuli type), released as Chefe in Ethiopia and as Hawata in Sudan<br />

and performing well in Kenya and Tanzania; (b) ICCV 92311 (kabuli type), released as KAK 2 in India<br />

and performing well in Kenya and Tanzania; and (c) ICCV 93954 (desi type), released as JG 11 in<br />

India and expected to perform well in SSA were selected for introgression of drought avoidance root<br />

traits through marker assisted backcrossing (MABC).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

With an aim of introgressing root traits for drought tolerance in farmer preferred cultivars through<br />

MABC, two genotypes ICC 8261 and ICC 4958 were chosen as donor parents based on their high<br />

performance for root length density and drought tolerance. Three genotypes (ICCV 92318, ICCV<br />

92311 and ICCV 93954) have been chosen as recurrent parents, and following three crosses (ICCV<br />

92318 × ICC 8261; ICCV 92311 × ICC 8261; ICCV 93954 × ICC 4958) were made during crop season<br />

2006/07. F1s from these crosses were grown in greenhouse during the off-season in 2007 and were<br />

backcrossed to the recurrent parent: (a) ICCV 92318 × (ICCV 92318 × ICC 8261), (b) ICCV 92311 ×<br />

(ICCV 92311 × ICC 8261); (c) ICCV 93954 × (ICCV 93954 × ICC 4958). For initiating foreground<br />

selection, root trait phenotyping data and SSR genotyping data obtained from intraspecific mapping<br />

population ICC 4958 × ICC 1882, a hotspot harboring several root trait QTLs with about 30%<br />

phenotypic variation have been identified on LG 5, with flanking markers TAA 170 and ICCM 0249.<br />

Genomic region bracketed by SSR markers (TAA 170 and ICCM 0249) has been used to select<br />

heterozygote plants carrying drought resistance gene for foreground selection, while 8 AFLP primer<br />

combinations were used to select the plants with higher genome recovery of the recurrent parent for<br />

background selection. After completing three cycles of MABC (BC 1 F 1 , BC 2 F 1 and BC 3 F 1 ) in 2008 and<br />

2009 and two cycles of selfing (BC 3 F 2 and BC 3 F 3 ) in <strong>2010</strong>, at present BC 3 F 3 progenies are being raised<br />

in the field for seed multiplication as well as agronomic performance at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, India. BC 3 F 4 seed<br />

will be sent to NARS partners (Kenya, Ethiopia and Tanzania) to test their agronomic performance<br />

under multi environments.<br />

Conclusions<br />

MABC has provided BC 3 F 3 progenies for three crosses are being raised for seed multiplication and<br />

testing their agronomic performance at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, India.<br />

PM Gaur, RK Varshney, SK Chamarthi,<br />

S Tripathi, V Vadez and L Krishnamurthy<br />

298


Activity 6.2.1.2 CP: Mapping and marker-assisted breeding for salinity tolerance in chickpea<br />

Milestone: Contrasting materials (varieties, breeding lines, germplasm) for salinity tolerance assessed<br />

under field conditions <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Since chickpea is pushed more and more to marginal area for cultivation, salinity has become an<br />

important problem to maintain its productivity in areas where either dryland salinity is a problem, or<br />

where brackish water is the only option for irrigation. Identification of tolerant germplasm has been<br />

done in the past and testing of most contrasting entries in the field is the next step.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

In Bhatinda, two treatments (non saline field and a salt-affected soil with poor quality irrigation water)<br />

and 3 replicates were used. At CCHAU, the trial was carried out in a naturally saline field.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

These trials were carried out in two locations (PAU – Bathinda and CCHAU, Hisar). At CCHAU,<br />

Hisar the plant population showed a constant decline with advance in age of the plants and drastically<br />

so after mid-Feb and the final counts were reduced by more than 70% in all the genotypes. Yields<br />

under salinity of the tolerant genotypes ICC 15868 (175 kg ha -1 ) and ICC 7819 (238 kg ha -1 ) were<br />

comparable to that of the CSG 8962 (201 kg ha -1 ). However a local check HC3 outperformed all these<br />

tolerant genotypes ((502 kg ha -1 ). There were large variations among replications indicating variation in<br />

salinity levels of the plots.<br />

The field trial at Bhatinda station with 20 genotypes was successful. Variation in salinity tolerance was<br />

confirmed. As examples, for parents of RILs: (i) ICC1431 had only a 26% decrease in yield, whereas<br />

ICC6263 suffered a 58% yield decrease, (ii) JG11 was reduced only 11% whereas ICCV10 was<br />

reduced 33%. These data from North India confirm the differences in tolerance as identified in the<br />

different climate at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in South India, and demonstrate field performance of the lines. The<br />

contrast in seed yield under salinity between the parents of the mapping populations of this project<br />

confirmed that ICC1431 were more tolerant than ICC6263, which opens the possibility to screen the<br />

mapping population in this site.<br />

Conclusions<br />

A number of the most promising germplasm previously identified at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> also turned out to be<br />

tolerant in the Bhatinda trial.<br />

Vincent Vadez, L Krishnamurthy, Pooran Gaur,<br />

colleagues from PAU (Dr Jagmeet Kaur) and<br />

at Hisar (Dr Raj Panu)<br />

Milestone: QTLs for salinity tolerance identified 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Salinity is a complex abiotic stress and understanding the physiological and genetic basis of salinity<br />

tolerance is a prerequisite for improving existing crop cultivars. Assessing the range of variation for<br />

seed yield and its components under saline and non-saline conditions, and mapping QTLs for salinity<br />

tolerance will aid in chickpea crop improvement.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The 126 F12 RILs from the cross between ICCV 2 and JG 62 were grown under saline and non-saline<br />

conditions during 2005-06 and 2007-08, along with parental lines. Genotyping of data for 216 markers<br />

was used to construct the genetic map and composite interval mapping (CIM) with 1000 permutations<br />

was done using QTL Cartographer for mapping QTLs.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Of the 216 markers tested, 135 markers were mapped on to eight linkage groups spanning a distance of<br />

310.2 cM, although 81 markers remained unmapped. Linkage groups were assigned to chromosomes<br />

based on known location of legacy SSR markers (Winter et al., 2000, Nayak et al., <strong>2010</strong>). The number<br />

of markers per linkage group ranged from 7 (LG8) to 45 (LG6). The length of each linkage group<br />

varied from 5.1 cM (LG2) to 129.9 cM (LG3). Overall inter marker distance was 2.3 cM (Figure 6.3).<br />

299


QTLs identified for 11 different surrogate traits under saline and non-saline conditions in both<br />

environments are also shown on the map (Figure 6.3). QTLs were identified for both late and early<br />

phenology groups under saline and non-saline conditions. In the late phenology group, a QTL was<br />

found for seed yield under salinity on LG3 in 2007–08, explaining 19% of the variation. In the late<br />

group, one QTL was also found on the same linkage group under non-saline control conditions,<br />

although in a different genomic region, for shoot dry weight in 2007-08 and for yield in 2005–06 and<br />

2007–08. However, in case of early phenology group no QTL was found for seed yield under salinity<br />

in either year or treatments. Nevertheless, of the possible components of seed yield in that group, one<br />

QTL for shoot dry weight under salinity was found on LG1 in 2007–08, explaining 13% of the<br />

variation, and one QTL for seed number under salinity was found on LG7 in 2007–08, explaining 25%<br />

of the variation. When the phenotyping data were used for QTL analysis, disregarding the groups of<br />

phenology, no QTLs for seed yield was found in any of the treatments for either of the two years.<br />

Nevertheless, a genomic region containing QTLs for seed number and 100-seed weight under saline<br />

conditions in both 2005–06 and 2007–08 was found on LG6.<br />

Figure 6.3: Genetic linkage map of chickpea (ICCV2 × JG62) with 135 marker loci on eight linkage groups. Kosambi map<br />

distances are on left hand side, genomic regions harboring QTLs (black bars) and QTLs for salinity-related-traits<br />

(colored squares), as listed in Table 2, on right hand side of linkage group for early phenology group (E), late phenology<br />

group (L), under both saline (S) and non-saline (C) conditions and two environments 2005–06 (05) and 2007–08 (07).<br />

Vincent Vadez, Pooran Gaur, Mahendar Thudi and Rajeev Varshney<br />

Milestone: Introgression of QTLs for salinity tolerance initiated in farmer-preferred varieties 2011<br />

This activity was differed as QTL identified for salinity tolerance explained limited variation and<br />

needed to be validated in other population.<br />

Pooran Gaur<br />

Activity 6.2.1.3 CP: Develop and evaluate chickpea transgenic events for enhanced tolerance to<br />

drought stress<br />

Milestone: Transgenic DREB/P5CSF events transgenic events available for introgression into locally<br />

adapted genotypes <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

DREB1A has been shown to alter transpiration efficiency, the capacity to extract water from the soil<br />

profile, and seed yield under intermittent drought in groundnut. The question we addressed here is<br />

whether DREB1A could have similar types of contribution on traits if inserted in chickpea.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A number of transgenic events were generated using C235 as a wild type recipient of DREB1A::rd29<br />

from Arabidopsis thaliana. Four events were selected from a larger screening for transpiration<br />

efficiency and were tested in lysimeters filled with Vertisol (1.20 m long and 20 cm diameter). There,<br />

two water regimes were used: either a fully irrigated control or a terminal water stress applied at 30<br />

days after sowing.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The trial was performed also to assess the seed yield and its relationships with the pattern of water<br />

extraction, the number and flowers, pods and seeds, and the pod and seed weight. Water uptake was<br />

300


assessed every week and flowers were tagged weekly to relate flower, and seed number, pod and seed<br />

weight to transpiration. Results indicated that while the cumulative water extraction pattern in few<br />

transgenic events was similar to the untransformed parent, the water extraction was less during the preflowering<br />

phase, but was more during the post-flowering phase in at least two transgenic events. The<br />

water extracted in week 5 after stress imposition was significantly related to the seed number and<br />

weight. A higher pod biomass accumulation was observed in two transgenic events under water stress<br />

conditions. Two transgenic events had significantly higher yield (pod weight, seed number and seed<br />

weight) than the untransformed control. Interestingly, most of the transgenic events had lower flower<br />

abortions as compared to their wild type countertypes.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Although differences were not significant in this trial, it appears that DREB1A tends to increase the<br />

capacity of plant to extract water from the soil profile, in a way that parallel earlier results in DREB1A<br />

groundnut.<br />

Krithika Anbazhagan, Mainassara Zaman, Pooja Bhatnagar,<br />

Kiran Sharma and Vincent Vadez<br />

Activity 6.2.1.4 CP (New): Develop chickpea breeding lines with heat tolerance and study<br />

mechanisms and genetics of heat tolerance<br />

Milestone: Sources of heat tolerance identified from the existing germplasm/breeding lines <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Rationale<br />

Heat stress has emerged as a major constraint to chickpea production in the SAT regions because of<br />

increasing area under late sown conditions due to intensification of the cropping system; shift in<br />

chickpea area from cooler, long-season environments to warmer, short season environments; and<br />

frequent raise in temperatures due to climate change. Assessing genetic variability for heat tolerance in<br />

the germplasm/breeding materials and identifying sources of tolerance is must for initiating breeding<br />

for heat tolerance in chickpea.<br />

(A) Screening of reference set of chickpea for heat tolerance<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The reference collection of chickpea germplasm (280 lines) was screened for high temperature<br />

tolerance at two locations (Patancheru and Kanpur) by delayed sowing and synchronizing the<br />

reproductive phase of the crop with higher temperatures (≥35°C).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Many heat tolerant lines were identified and some of these lines showed no reduction in yield under<br />

heat stress conditions. The reference set showed significant variations for heat tolerance index (HTI),<br />

phenology, yield and yield components at both the locations. A cluster analysis of the HTI of the two<br />

locations yielded five cluster groups: (i) stable tolerant [18 genotypes] (ii) tolerant only at Patancheru<br />

[34] (iii) tolerant only at Kanpur [23] (iv) moderately tolerant [120] and (v) stable sensitive [82].<br />

Among the eighteen stable and heat tolerant genotypes identified, six genotypes (ICC 637, ICC 1205,<br />

ICC 3362, ICC 14402, ICC 14815 and ICC 15618) yielded higher under stress conditions and also had<br />

higher HTI values. Some of the genotypes (e.g. ICC 14778 and ICC 4958) identified as heat tolerant in<br />

this study were earlier identified as drought tolerant.<br />

Conclusions<br />

This suggests that it is possible to develop cultivars with combined tolerance to terminal drought and<br />

heat stresses. The pod number per plant and the harvest index were identified as key traits that can be<br />

used in selections for heat tolerance.<br />

L Krishnamurthy, PM Gaur, PS Basu, SK Chaturvedi,<br />

S Tripathi, V Vadez, A Rathore, RK Varshney and CLL Gowda<br />

(A) Mulilocation evaluation of genotypes for heat tolerance<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A set of 60 germplasm/breeding lines, including both desi and kabuli types, was evaluated at four<br />

locations (Patancheru, Kanpur, Jabalpur and Nandyal) under normal and late-sown conditions to identify<br />

301


stable heat tolerant genotypes. The experimental design used was randomized block design with two replications.<br />

Observations were recorded on phenological characters, yield components and yield.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Based on grain yield under heat stress conditions, several heat tolerant genotypes were identified. The<br />

top ten heat tolerant genotypes included 8 breeding lines/released varieties [ICCV 2, ICCV 06302,<br />

ICCV 07118, ICCV 07109, ICCV 96970 (JG 16), ICCV 93952 (JAKI 9218), ICCV 92311 (KAK 2)<br />

and ICCV 87207 (Vishal)] and two germplasm lines (ICC 8474, ICC 9942).<br />

Conclusions<br />

Several breeding lines with heat tolerance at multilocations were identified<br />

PM Gaur, K Suresh, Shailesh Tripathi, CLL Gowda,<br />

V Jayalakshmi (Nandyal), Anita Babbar (Jabalpur)<br />

and SK Chaturvedi (Kanpur)<br />

Milestones: Mechanisms of reproductive stage heat tolerance identified, 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

A better understanding of the mechanisms of heat tolerance will help in developing effective breeding<br />

strategies for heat tolerance.<br />

(A) Experiment conducted at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two controlled environment experiments were conducted with one heat tolerant (ICCV 92944) and one<br />

heat sensitive (ICC 5912) genotypes. The two genotypes were grown in five replications under stress<br />

and non-stress conditions.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The one day exposure of flower buds to high temperature influenced pollen viability inside the anthers.<br />

In ICC5912, the pollen grains inside the anthers were fertile up to 34/19ºC. At 35/20ºC, all pollen<br />

grains inside the anther became sterile. In addition, there was no pod set in ICC5912 at 35/20ºC. In<br />

ICCV92944, the high temperature of 35/20ºC did not influence pollen fertility and the pollen grains<br />

were fertile. At 40/25ºC, the pollen grains inside the anther were partially sterile in ICCV92944.<br />

Therefore, the critical temperature for pod set in ICC5912 was 35/20ºC. Pollen germination and pollen<br />

tube growth was found in ICCV92944 at 35/20ºC. ICC5912 at 35/20º C had no pollen germination on<br />

the stigma and it had reduced pod set (P


100C, night) and heat stress conditions (38/25 0 C). Interestingly, the tolerant genotype, ICCV 92944<br />

had higher values and also performed almost identically at the normal and high temperature conditions.<br />

Further, yield parameters (biomass, pod number, filled pods, seed weight and harvest index) invariably<br />

decreased under stress conditions, but, the two heat tolerant genotypes were characterized by less<br />

reduction in yield parameters coupled with less membrane damage and better membrane injury index<br />

compared to the sensitive genotypes at ≥38 0 C. ICCV 92944 (tolerant) maintained higher chlorophyll<br />

content and lower cellular respiration at higher temperatures compared to the remaining three<br />

genotypes. The analysis of photosynthesis and fluorescence parameters indicates 20-35 0 C to be the best<br />

temperature range for photosynthesis in chickpea. Sucrose synthase levels (controls seed size) were<br />

higher in the two tolerant chickpea genotypes (ICCV 92944/ICCV 07110) in leaves; and ICCV 07110<br />

had higher in its seed compared to the sensitive genotypes at >350C. Three genotypes (tolerant- ICCV<br />

07110/92944; sensitive- ICC 14183) had large seeds, higher sucrose synthase and invertase activity.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Different parameters measured in both resistant and susceptible types could be used as indicators for<br />

heat tolerance, most preferably in combination rather than individually.<br />

Harsh Nayyar, PS Basu, PM Gaur,<br />

SK Chaturvedi and Nalini Mallikarjuna<br />

Milestone: Genetics of heat tolerance worked out 2012<br />

Rationale<br />

Understanding the genetics of heat tolerance is important for developing breeding strategies for heat tolerance.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Ten crosses involving four tolerant (ICC 1205, ICC 8950, ICC 1356, ICC 15614) and two sensitive<br />

(ICC 4567, ICC 10685) lines were made.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The crosses were made between: (i) Susceptible x Susceptible; (ii) Tolerant x Tolerant and; (iii)<br />

Susceptible x Tolerant genotypes. The F1 seeds were harvested. The genetics of heat tolerance would<br />

be studied in F 2 and one or two crosses would be advanced using SSD for development of RILs<br />

PM Gaur, K Suresh and CLL Gowda<br />

Pigeonpea<br />

Output target 6.2.1 PP: Improved pigeonpea for salinity tolerance using biotechnology<br />

Activity 6.2.1.1 PP: Identify superior pigeonpea genotypes for salinity tolerance<br />

Milestone: A set of pigeonpea genotypes suitable to breed for breeding salinity tolerance identified<br />

2009<br />

No activity due to lack of financial support.<br />

Activity 6.2.1.2 PP: Develop intra- and inter-specific mapping population of pigeonpea between<br />

contrasting materials for salinity tolerance<br />

Milestone: At least two mapping populations developed to map QTLs for salinity tolerance in pigeonpea <strong>2010</strong><br />

No activity due to lack of financial support.<br />

Sorghum<br />

Output target 6.2.1 SO: Improved sorghum for abiotic tolerance<br />

Activity 6.2.1.2 SO: Selecting for sorghum lines for abiotic stress tolerance.<br />

Milestone 6.2.1: Five sorghum varieties for salinity tolerance developed <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Soils are saline in many parts of the world especially the coast line of Saudi countries. Further, the<br />

water they apply to crop lands is also saline. A project with funding support from OPEC countries is<br />

being implemented to select sorghum cultivars for saline soil conditions.<br />

303


Materials and Methods<br />

A total of 80 F 7 progenies (from 91 F 6 progenies) and 73 F 8 progenies (from 153 F 7 progenies) were<br />

selected for B-line development program and 16 F 7 progenies (from 17 F 6 progenies) and 53 F 8<br />

progenies (from 94 F 7 progenies) were selected for R-line development program at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>,<br />

Patancheru in the 2009 postrainy season. These were test crossed and selected further among the<br />

progenies. The test crosses along with the progenies were evaluated during rainy season, <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Twenty nine BC 1 s on A 1 cytoplasm were selected based on maintainer reaction for further advancing<br />

and 39 R-lines were selected among the progenies which showed restorer reaction.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The above (twenty nine BC 1 s and 39 R-lines) are being evaluated in a nursery along with high yielding<br />

R-lines in post rainy season, <strong>2010</strong>. Also, the seed of the promising varieties (16) and hybrids (10) each<br />

2.5 kg that were earlier selected in salinity tolerant trials conducted at Agricultural Research Station,<br />

Gangavathi, during late rainy season, 2008 is also being increased.<br />

P Srinivas Rao and Belum VS Reddy.<br />

Output 6.3: Annually knowledge of the improvements of the biotechnological and conventional<br />

tools designed to facilitate biofortification and biodetoxification, breeding improved germplasm<br />

and management strategies (against mycotoxin contamination) of mandate crops and associated<br />

capacity building made available to partners internationally<br />

Output target 6.3.1 FORT: High yielding and micronutrient dense hybrids/improved<br />

populations/varieties of sorghum and promising transgenic events of groundnut and pigeonpea<br />

with high beta-carotene content available for testing in national trials<br />

Activity 6.3.1.1 FORT: Develop groundnut transgenic events for enhanced production of betacarotene<br />

Milestone: One or two transgenic events of groundnut with high beta-carotene content used for<br />

introgression into locally adapted genotypes and the progeny characterized and evaluated 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

While groundnut is an excellent sources of nutrition in terms of carbohydrates, proteins, oils and<br />

various minerals including iron and zinc, it lacks ß-carotene or provitamin A. Moreover, there is no<br />

genetic variability available in the existing germplasm for this important trait. Hence this study aims to<br />

enhance the levels of ß-carotene in groundnut by using genetic engineering approaches.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

A PCR based cloning of the phytoene synthase gene (psyI from maize), that control the production of<br />

ß-carotene was carried out and fused with the CaMV 35S promoter (for constitutive expression) or with<br />

the promotor from oleosin gene of Arabidopsis (for seed-specific expression in oil bodies) and used for<br />

development of over 90 primary transgenic events of groundnut (var. JL 24) through Agrobacteriummediated<br />

gene transfer. Seventy two events out of 90 primary transgenic events carrying oleo: psy<br />

genes that were previously developed have been advanced to next generation.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Molecular analysis of the transgenic events using PCR with gene-specific primers revealed the<br />

integration and presence of the transgene. Transgene expression in the developing pods of groundnut<br />

was observed by RT- PCR analysis. The inheritance pattern was studied in the transgenic events which<br />

confirmed Mendelian segregation in most of the transgenic events. Southern analysis was carried out<br />

with selected events and copy number ranged from one to three copies of the transgene. Molecular and<br />

biochemical data showed the stability of gene in advanced generations. The level of total carotenoids<br />

was 10 to 12-fold higher in transgenic events as compared to the untransformed controls. On the basis<br />

of total carotenoids and HPLC data, 7 events were selected and advanced to T 2 generation. Beta<br />

carotene levels in these transgenic events ranged from 0.01-0.32 ug /gm in T1 seeds which is a 10 fold<br />

increase than the control plants. In T 2 seeds beta carotene range was 0.04-1.54 μg/gm. However, other<br />

associated carotenoids such as Lutein, ß- Cryptoxanthin have been found to be increased by 10- 15 fold<br />

in transgenics as compared to control. (ß-Cryptoxanthin ranged between 0.22-9.65 μg/gm).<br />

304


An intriguing observation was that the transgenics had much higher lutein content amongst the<br />

individual carotenoids. Since, ß-lycopene cyclase (BLYC) is the key enzyme involved in ß-carotene<br />

biosynthetic pathway (where lutein to γ carotene and γ-carotene to ß-carotene conversions take place),<br />

we assume that over expression of BLYC may result in much higher accumulation of ß-carotene. The<br />

TaBLYC gene was sub cloned in to binary vector Pzp200.oleo.psy and have been using for pyramiding<br />

of these two genes to meet the target levels of provitamin A. Over 55 marker free putative transgenic<br />

groundnut (JL24) plants harboring maize psy1 and tomato ß-LYC genes were produced and were<br />

characterized at molecular level to confirm stable integration and expression of transgene. Biochemical<br />

analysis of the confirmed transgenic plants through HPLC showed an accumulation 1.2 to 5.4 µg/gm of<br />

β-Carotene which corresponds to multi fold increase in the levels of β-Carotene when compared to<br />

untransformed control. The selected events with higher levels of β-carotene were advanced to next<br />

generation. Almost all transgenic events showed inheritance pertaining to Mendelian segregation<br />

patterns. Biochemical analysis of the T1 progenies of the selected transgenic events showed a decrease<br />

in the levels total carotenoids and β-Carotene when compared to the T0 generation. Furthermore, 3<br />

different Groundnut Genotypes viz., CS39, ICGV05155, ICGV06040 developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> which are<br />

rich in Iron (Fe), Zinc (Zn) were transformed with maize psy1 and tomato ß-LYC genes and 120 marker<br />

free PZP200.Oleo:PSY::35S:BLYC putative transgenic Groundnut plants were developed. Molecular<br />

characterization of the above putative transgenic plant is being performed which will be followed by<br />

biochemical analysis to estimate the levels of carotenoid accumulation in confirmed transgenic<br />

groundnut plants.<br />

Besides, a new RNAi strategy has been initiated to down regulate the Epsilon cyclase (ε-Cyc) and ß-<br />

Hydroxylase (BCH) genes. The hypothesis of this study is that these genes in the carotenoid pathway<br />

might be responsible for decreased accumulation of β-Carotene either due to diverging carotenoid<br />

biosynthetic pathway towards higher α- Carotene accumulation (ε-Cyc) or due to conversion β-<br />

Carotene into Zeaxanthin (β-Hydroxylase). These genes has been isolated from groundnut and cloned<br />

into pGEMT-Easy vector and sequenced.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Level of total carotenoids was 10-25 fold increase in transgenic events as compared to the<br />

untransformed controls. Preliminary studies showed an enhanced β-carotene level (~5.5 μg/g) in two<br />

events. These events have been advanced further for gene stability as well as biochemical profiling.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and SN Nigam<br />

Activity 6.3.1.2 FORT: Develop pigeonpea transgenic events for enhanced production to betacarotenes.<br />

Milestone: 5-7 introgressed transgenic lines of pigeonpea with enhanced beta-carotene content<br />

evaluated and development of commercialization package initiated 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Pigeonpea seed contains on average approximately 21% protein and reasonable amounts of essential<br />

amino acids. Considering the state of Vitamin A malnutrition in most developing and under-developed<br />

countries and the role pigeonpea can play in subsistence farming, the nutritional improvement of<br />

pigeonpea with high-level of ß-carotene can play a very important role. Hence this study aims at<br />

engineering the pro-vitamin A (ß-carotene) biosynthetic pathway in pigeonpea seeds.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Over 140 primary pigeonpea transgenic events of pigeonpea carrying the maize psy1 gene were<br />

developed and established in the containment greenhouse for seed development and further<br />

characterization. Seeds of T1 generation of pigeonpea transgenics were collected from 90 events with<br />

the maize psy1 gene to study transgene inheritance, segregation and expression in their progeny.<br />

Extraction and quantification of total carotenoids and ß-carotene in primary transgenic pigeonpea seeds<br />

was carried out for the selection of best events<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation was previously carried out using the binary vectors<br />

containing maize psy1 gene driven by oleosin promoter for generating pigeonpea transgenic events<br />

with enhanced level of ß-carotene. Over 140 putative transgenic plants with maize psy1 were<br />

transferred to the containment greenhouse and characterized at molecular level for the integration and<br />

305


expression of the transgenes. Total carotenoids in the primary T 0 putative pigeonpea plants were<br />

estimated spectrophotometrically and 11 events selected for further analysis. The selected events<br />

showed 2 to 3-fold increase in ß-carotene levels evidenced using HPLC analysis.<br />

Over 60 transgenic events were advanced to T1 generation and subjected to molecular analysis. Seeds<br />

were collected from T 1 generation plants and subjected to HPLC analyses for ß-carotene content of<br />

seed samples. Studies indicate that the transgenics had much higher lutein content over the controls<br />

amongst the individual carotenoids. Since, ß-lycopene cyclase (BLYC) is the key enzyme involved in ß-<br />

carotene synthesis pathway, we assume that gene pyramiding with psy1 and BLYC may result in much<br />

higher accumulation of ß-carotene. Development of newer marker free pigeonpea transgenic plants<br />

carrying both maize psy1 and tomato ßlyc genes was initiated by using binary vector<br />

pZP200.Ole:PSY::35S:BLYC, to meet the target levels of provitamin A.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Total carotenoids were estimated spectrophotometrically and the transgenic events showed almost two<br />

fold increase in the total carotenoids. Based on this, 11 events were selected for further analysis for ß-<br />

carotene estimations using HPLC. Where, a few selected events showed up to 2 to 3 fold increase in ß-<br />

carotene levels.<br />

KK Sharma, Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur and KB Saxena<br />

Activity 6.3.1.3 FORT: Selecting sorghum lines for high grain Fe and Zn contents<br />

Milestone: Three varieties with high grain Fe (>40ppm) and Zn (>30 ppm) contents identified <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Micronutrient malnutrition (especially of Fe and Zn) is a major health problem in the developing<br />

countries. Biofortification is a cost effective and sustainable solution to combat micronutrient<br />

malnutrition. It complements well with the supplementation and chemical fortification methods<br />

currently being employed to address micronutrient malnutrition. Identification of high grain high Fe<br />

and Zn lines from the established varieties/R-lines helps in quick development of varieties and hybrids.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> developed more than 1000 R-lines for various traits of global interest. A total of 52<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred sorghum R-lines were evaluated for two years (2008 and 2009 postrainy seasons) for<br />

assessing the grain Fe and Zn contents<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

The mean performance of the 52 <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred sorghum R-lines for two years (2008 and 2009<br />

postrainy seasons) showed that for grain Fe the lines ranged from 25 to 39 ppm with an average of 31<br />

ppm (SE+: 2.23) and grain Zn content from 16 to 28 ppm with an average of 21 ppm (SE+: 1.26). The<br />

controls – PVK 801 and RS 29 respectively had 33 and 27 ppm grain Fe and 21 and 16 ppm grain Zn.<br />

Two R-lines ICSR 113 and ICSR 89035 were significantly superior (by 7% and 9%) to the control -<br />

PVK 801 for grain Fe contents with grain Fe 38 and 39 ppm and significantly superior (by 25% and<br />

16%) for grain Zn contents with grain Zn 28 and 26 ppm. Thirty R-lines were significantly 5 to 33%<br />

superior to the control - RS 29 for grain Fe contents with grain Fe ranging from 30 to 39 ppm and<br />

significantly superior (by 6 and 62%) for grain Zn contents ranging from 18 to 28 ppm<br />

Conclusions<br />

The results showed that thirty R-lines were significantly (by 5 to 33%) superior to the control - RS 29<br />

for grain Fe contents with grain Fe ranging from 30 to 39 ppm and significantly superior (by 6 and<br />

62%) for grain Zn contents ranging from 18 to 28 ppm which can be evaluated in multilocation trials<br />

for assessing the stability of their performance.<br />

A Ashok Kumar and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Output target 6.3.2 DTOX: Transgenic groundnut with enhanced resistance to Aspergillus flavus<br />

and aflatoxin production identified and available for introgression into regionally adapted<br />

germplasm<br />

Activity 6.3.2.1 DTOX: Develop and evaluate groundnut transgenic for enhanced resistance to<br />

Aspergillus flavus<br />

306


Milestone: Five promising transgenic events of groundnut with PNLOX13S gene identified for<br />

introgression <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Aspergillus flavus infection and subsequent aflatoxin contamination of peanut presents a serious<br />

agricultural, economical, and health hazard worldwide, especially in developing countries. Since the<br />

traditional approaches have not worked fully, it is critical that to identify novel solutions to this<br />

problem. A transgenic approach using seed lipid metabolizing lipoxygenases (LOX) based on available<br />

evidences of Aspergillus sp. activating the seed lipid pools for sporulation and mycotoxin development<br />

by overexpressing Pn13LOX gene has been carried out for possible inhibition of aflatoxin biosynthesis.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Molecular characterization of 20 previously developed transgenic events carrying 35S: PN LOX13S<br />

has been carried out. Some of these transgenic events have been advanced to T2 generation for seed<br />

multiplication and inheritance studies. The phenotypic evaluation of these events is being planned<br />

under contained greenhouse conditions in near future.<br />

Since, elongation of these plants was a major bottleneck; efforts were made to isolate the novel seedspecific<br />

promoters from groundnut (GSSP) and chickpea (CPLP) to target the expression of the<br />

lipoxynase gene in a seed-specific manner, since seed is the ultimate target for A. flavus infection. The<br />

efficiency of both the promoters has been confirmed through promoter binding studies using electro<br />

mobility shift assay (EMSA) and by histochemical GUS expression in Arabidopsis. Constructs were<br />

made using both these promoters to drive the peanut lipoxygenase gene (PnLOX3) in groundnut and<br />

tobacco.<br />

KK Sharma and Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur<br />

Milestone (New): Transgenic events carrying the rice chitinase gene (RChit) characterized and<br />

screened for A. flavus resistance <strong>2010</strong><br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Molecular characterization of four transgenic events carrying the rice chitinase gene (RChit) that had<br />

previously shown higher chitinase activity were advanced to subsequent generations and their fungal<br />

bioassays were carried out under lab/greenhouse conditions by using groundnut varieties JL 24 and J11<br />

as controls. Nine selected transgenic lines in T7 generation which consistently showed 0-10% A. flavus<br />

infection in vitro were further screened under micro-sick plots. The transgenic events had chitinase<br />

activity ranging from 2-9 folds in groundnut transgenics compare to untransformed controls.<br />

Micro-sick plots were designed and developed in the field for contained field evaluation of these<br />

transgenic events according to the biosafety considerations. A strip trial for event selection under<br />

natural infection was carried out during the Kharif <strong>2010</strong> (rainy season) with 9 selected transgenic<br />

events (T6 progenies) under contained field conditions on <strong>ICRISAT</strong> campus. Each micro-sick plot (2m<br />

x 3m x 1m) was filled with sand: compost (90:1) with a provision of pipeline system for root-zone<br />

watering, maintaining the pod zone dry. Inoculum (organic-matrix) for these experiments was prepared<br />

by growing A. flavus on autoclaved sorghum seeds at 28 o C for 5 days for use in the experiments. A<br />

total of five inoculations were done viz., before planting, third week of planting, fifth week of planting,<br />

seventh week of planting and after ninth week of planting. In each inoculation, 50-60 g of organicmatrix<br />

treatments (A. flavus sporulated sorghum seed) was applied and raked into the soil surface<br />

within 10 cm of the either side of the planting row. Post inoculation, at 65-70 days of planting<br />

thermocouples were installed to a depth of 5 cm for recording soil temperature. A water stress in pod<br />

zone was imposed at this stage while controlled irrigation was supplied in the root zone until<br />

harvesting. At the time of harvest, the sampling of pods was done for a comprehensive evaluation of<br />

pre-harvest infection, and aflatoxin content in the seeds using the ELISA based detection system<br />

developed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. The A. flavus group population densities were measured in the soil at different<br />

stages of viz., planting, at flowering and at harvest.<br />

Results indicated that all transgenic events showed significantly lower A. flavus infection ranging from<br />

(5-24%), and aflatoxin content (4-228 ppb) than the susceptible control JL 24 which showed highest A.<br />

flavus infection (37.3%) and aflatoxin content (386 pp). Transgenic event 24 and 12 showed<br />

significantly lower A. flavus infection (5 and 14.4% respectively) compared to other transgenic events<br />

307


and JL 24. Event # 12, 23, 27, 29, 31, 44, and J11 showed low aflatoxin content (4-94 µg/kg) compared<br />

to other transgenic events and JL 24.<br />

KK Sharma and Pooja Bhatnagar-Mathur<br />

Output target 6.3.3 DTOX: Simple and cost-effect test for the estimation of mycotoxins<br />

(Aflatoxins, Fumonisins and Ochratoxin-A) in crops and commodities, and aflatoxin-adducts in<br />

human serum developed and validated<br />

Activity 6.3.3.1 DTOX: Develop simple and cost-effective assays for the detection of mycotoxins in<br />

crops and commodities<br />

No milestone for <strong>2010</strong> or subsequent years<br />

Output target 6.3.4 DTOX: Aflatoxin resistant/tolerant groundnut genotypes identified<br />

Activity 6.3.4.1 DTOX: Evaluate groundnut varieties for resistance to Aspergillus flavus and<br />

aflatoxin production by in vitro inoculation studies and on-station testing in sick fields<br />

Milestone: Preliminary, advanced and elite foliar disease resistant breeding lines evaluated for<br />

resistance A. flavus and aflatoxin production under artificial inoculation conditions in the field 2009<br />

Rationale<br />

Aflatoxin contamination affects both human and livestock health and restricts the international trade of<br />

the commodity. Growing tolerant varieties compliments with pre and post harvest management to<br />

minimize Aflatoxin contamination.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

New breeding lines, ICGV 08050, ICGV 08058, ICGV 07165, ICGV 08006, ICGV 08030, ICGV<br />

08043, ICGV 08268, and ICGV 08234 were used as sources of resistance to aflatoxin in hybridization<br />

program. Multilocation testing of promising lines<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

One set of international aflatoxin resistant groundnut varietal trial seed to India (Gujarat) and<br />

Bangladesh, and 7 segregating populations were made available to Vietnam.<br />

New crosses: Ten new crosses were completed in the 2009/10 postrainy and <strong>2010</strong> rainy seasons to<br />

develop aflatoxin tolerant breeding lines.<br />

Breeding populations: In the 2009/10 postrainy season, 249 F 2 -F 11 bulks and 95 plant progenies were<br />

sown for further selection. From these, 355 bulk and 119 single plant selections were made. Of these,<br />

77 advance generation bulks were identified for inclusion in replicated yield trials. Similarly in the<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season, 207 F 2 -F 12 bulks and 119 plant progenies were sown for further selections. From<br />

these, 238 bulks and 423 single plant selections were made. The promising selections for agronomic<br />

traits came from the crosses, (55-437 x UF-71-513-1), (TMV 2 x PI 337409), and (ICGV 91114 x<br />

ICGV 07152).<br />

Yield Trials:<br />

During the 2009 rainy season and in 2009/10 postriany season one hundred and twenty three advanced<br />

breeding lines including controls were evaluated for yield and other agronomic traits in three replicated<br />

trials. Same set of trials were also planted in Aflatoxin sick field for screening in the 2009/10 postrainy<br />

season. The main results are as below-<br />

i. 2009 rainy season:<br />

In an Advanced Trial, two test lines ICGV 08041(3.2±0.24 t ha -1 pod yield, 73% shelling outturn, 42 g<br />

HSW) and ICGV 08038 (3.1 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 31 g HSW) gave significantly<br />

higher pod yield than the highest yielding control JL 24 (2.3 t ha -1 pod yield, 60% shelling outturn, 31 g<br />

HSW).<br />

308


In Preliminary Trial-1, only one line ICGV 09065 (4.4±0.42 t ha -1 pod yield, 61% shelling outturn, and<br />

29 g HSW) significantly outperformed the highest yielding control ICGV 88145 (2.0 t ha -1 pod yield,<br />

65% shelling outturn, and 39 g HSW).<br />

In Preliminary Trial-2, six lines (3.8-2.8±0.29 t ha -1 pod yield) gave significantly higher pod yield than<br />

the highest yielding control ICGV 88145 (2.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 58% shelling outturn, 37 g HSW). The<br />

best entry in the trial was ICGV 09087 (3.8 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW) followed<br />

by ICGV 09081 (3.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 63% shelling outturn, 42 g HSW)<br />

ii. 2009/10 postrainy season:<br />

In an Advanced Trial, four lines (4.1-3.4±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outyielded the highest<br />

yielding resistant control ICGV 88145 (2.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 68% shelling outturn, 44 g HSW, 0.0%<br />

A.flavus infection, and 0.0 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination). ICGV 08038 ranked first in pod yield (4.1 t<br />

ha -1 pod yield, 75% shelling outturn, 40 g HSW, 3.5% A.flavus infection, and 209.5 µg/kg Aflatoxin<br />

contamination). In addition, six other lines showed resistance (0.0 µg/kg) to Aflatoxin contamination<br />

with pod yield range of 3.2-2.5 t ha -1 .<br />

In Preliminary Trial-1, three lines (4.3-3.9±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outyielded the highest<br />

yielding control JL 24 (3.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 72% shelling outturn, 38 g HSW, 2.0% A.flavus infection,<br />

and 1.25 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination). ICGV 09054 ranked first in pod yield (4.3 t ha -1 pod yield,<br />

71% shelling outturn, 50 g HSW, 0.0% A.flavus infection, and 10.5 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination),<br />

ICGV 09058 ranked second (4.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 71% shelling outturn, 45 g HSW, 0.0% A.flavus<br />

infection, and 10.7 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination), and ICGV 09051 ranked third (3.9 t ha -1 pod yield,<br />

71% shelling outturn, 47 g HSW, 4.0% A.flavus infection, and 3.6 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination).<br />

In Preliminary Trial-2, 13 lines (4.0-3.4±0.25 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outyielded the highest<br />

yielding resistant control J 11 (2.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 68% shelling outturn, 35 g HSW, 0.0% A.flavus<br />

infection, and 3.35 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination). ICGV 09083 ranked fourth in pod yield (3.7 t ha -1<br />

pod yield, 72% shelling outturn, 54 g HSW, 0.0% A.flavus infection, and 0.0 µg/kg Aflatoxin<br />

contamination), ICGV 09087 ranked seventh (3.6 t ha -1 pod yield, 78% shelling outturn, 46g HSW,<br />

1.0% A.flavus infection, and 1.3 µg/kg Aflatoxin contamination), and ICGV 09100 ranked tenth (3.6 t<br />

ha -1 pod yield, 76% shelling outturn, 36 g HSW, 6.0% A.flavus infection, and 1.15 µg/kg Aflatoxin<br />

contamination).<br />

iii. <strong>2010</strong> rainy season:<br />

One hundred and forty eight advanced breeding lines including controls were evaluated for yield and<br />

other agronomic traits in four replicated trials.<br />

In an Elite Trial, ICGV 08040(1.7±0.22 t ha -1 pod yield, 67% shelling outturn, 34 g HSW) gave<br />

significantly higher pod yield than the highest yielding control J 11 (1.2 t ha -1 pod yield, 65% shelling<br />

outturn, 25 g HSW).<br />

In an Advanced Trial, eleven lines (3.0±0.21 t ha -1 pod yield) gave significantly higher pod yield than<br />

the highest yielding control ICGV 88145 (1.4 t ha -1 pod yield, 61% shelling outturn, 30 g HSW). ICGV<br />

09084 produced highest pod yield (3.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 68% shelling outturn, 35 g HSW) followed by<br />

ICGV 09081 (2.9 t ha -1 pod yield, 68% shelling outturn, 33 g HSW)<br />

In Preliminary Trial-1, nine lines (3.0±0.21 t ha -1 pod yield) significantly outperformed the highest<br />

yielding control ICGV 88145 (1.2 t ha -1 pod yield, 61% shelling outturn, and 28 g HSW). The highest<br />

yielding cultivar in the trial was ICGV 10040 (3.0 t ha -1 pod yield, 68% shelling outturn, 51 g HSW)<br />

followed by ICGV 10038 (2.7 t ha -1 pod yield, 71% shelling outturn, 39 g HSW)<br />

In Preliminary Trial-2, two lines (2.1±0.14 t ha -1 pod yield) gave significantly higher pod yield than the<br />

highest yielding control J 11(1.4 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 21 g HSW). The best entry in<br />

the trial was ICGV 10067 (2.1 t ha -1 pod yield, 66% shelling outturn, 25 g HSW).<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

309


Milestone: Ten interspecific derivatives of groundnut evaluated for A. flavus and aflatoxin resistance<br />

and promising lines identified (HKS/NM) 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Wild relatives of crop plants in general and Arachis species in particular are known to have multiple<br />

disease resistance. With the published report on the transfer of A. flavus-aflatoxin resistance from<br />

Arachis species, work was initiated at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on the introgression of A. flavus-aflatoxin resistance<br />

from Arachis species.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Advance generation and stable interspecific derivatives, new sources of tetraploid groundnut<br />

synthesized at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and hybrids lines between cultivated x new sources of tetraploid groundnut<br />

were screened in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> sick plot for A. flavus-aflatoxin resistance.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Hundred and forty lines of advanced generation interspecific derivatives of groundnut, with some of<br />

the lines repeated from first year’s experiment were screened for Aspergillus flavus infection and<br />

aflatoxin production. From these lines 36 lines with low A. flavus infection and aflatoxin production<br />

were identified for further evaluation. Based on first year’s data four promising lines were crossed<br />

with elite groundnut cultivars and the F3 progeny were screened for A. flavus infection and aflatoxin<br />

production. All the lines registered low A. flavus damage and aflatoxin production.<br />

Crosses between elite groundnut cultivars and new sources of amphidiploid groundnut (ISATGR 1212)<br />

were carried out and high degree of recombination was observed between the two (Table 1). Six F 3<br />

progeny lines and one F 4 progeny line were screened for A. flavus infection and aflatoxin production.<br />

It was interesting to note that all the lines showed low A. flavus infection. With respect to aflatoxin<br />

production except for two lines which produced higher aflatoxin (235-833ug/g), rest of the five lines<br />

produced low aflatoxin (0-6.7 ug/g).<br />

Nine Bolivian landrace lines were included in the study to test for A. flavus infection and aflatoxin<br />

production. Eight lines showed low A. flavus infection (0-3%) and all the nine lines 9including the one<br />

with higher A. flavus infection (34 %) produced low aflatoxin (0-6.0 ug/g).<br />

The results show that all the three approaches of utilizing advanced generation interspecific derivatives<br />

derived from Arachis species, Bolivian landraces, as well as utilizing synthetic groundnut are good<br />

sources to transfer resistance to A. flavus infection and aflatoxin production.<br />

Table 6.6: Aspergillus flavus infection and aflatoxin production in cultivated x ISATGR 1212<br />

lines<br />

Conclusions<br />

It is possible to transfer A. flavus resistance and low aflatoxin production from wild relatives of<br />

groundnut<br />

Hari Krishan Sudini and Nalini Mallikarjuna<br />

310


Activity 6.3.4.2 DTOX: Evaluate various soil amendments and biocontrol agents for reducing preharvest<br />

A. flavus/ aflatoxin contamination in groundnut<br />

No milestones for <strong>2010</strong> and subsequent years<br />

Output target 6.3.5. IPM: Effective and eco- friendly IPM technologies designed, evaluated and<br />

shared with the NARS/NGOs<br />

Activity 6.3.5.1 IPM: Develop and validate effective IPM technologies for crop production<br />

Milestone: IPM options tested and validated on-station and on-farm, and disseminated to the farmers<br />

through NARS and NGOs 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

Eco-friendly, effective and economically feasible plant protections options have greater role to play in<br />

developing IPM technologies. Among various options naturally occurring insect pathogens were found<br />

very specific to target pests. Developing a bio-agent with high persistence to suit easy application is of<br />

high importance.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two locally available inert dusts were selected and the required virus quantity has been inoculated. The<br />

virulence of the virus in different formulations was bio-assayed at monthly intervals and compared with<br />

fresh control.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Two talc based powder formulations of Helicoverpa NPV have been developed and their bio-efficacy<br />

has been evaluated under laboratory conditions. These powder formulations after sixteen months of<br />

storage under laboratory conditions resulted in similar larval mortality compared with fresh virus<br />

(94%). Field efficacy trials are underway in chickpea during <strong>2010</strong>-11 season.<br />

Conclusions<br />

NPV powder formulation was found effective in suppression of Helicoverpa on par with conventional<br />

chemical, Monocrotophos. This can be a better tool in IPM where application of the bio-agent as spray<br />

is a constraint.<br />

GV Ranga Rao<br />

Milestone: Insect pest and disease diagnostic tools and pest population dynamics models in relation to<br />

climatic changes developed (GVRR/HCS/HKS/SP/RS) 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

One of the problems in addressing pest management is inadequate knowledge about the factors<br />

influencing pest population dynamics. To understand pest dynamics several researchers collect pest<br />

surveillance data and related agricultural operations and other weather parameters. Correlations<br />

between some of these factors and pest incidence based on statistical models have been developed.<br />

However, a functionally viable model for pest forecast is still needed by farmers for efficient and<br />

effective pest management.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Pest surveillance data collected at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on key pests of chickpea, pigeonpea and groundnut crops<br />

was correlated with daily weather in the farm.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Pest surveillance data generated from 1991 to 2008 at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on key pests of groundnut, chickpea<br />

and pigeonpea crops has been summarized according to standard week for detailed analysis. The data<br />

will be subjected to climate variability over years in order to make appropriate conclusions about the<br />

influence of climate variability on insect pest populations. The data need to be looked critically in<br />

collaboration with agro-climatologist to draw appropriate conclusions. This would be the prime activity<br />

for the coming years.<br />

GV Ranga Rao<br />

311


Output targets 6.3.6. CAP: Capacity of NARS/NGOs enhanced, and products/information on<br />

improved cultivars and crop production technologies disseminated in Asia<br />

Activity 6.3.6.1 CAP: Capacity building and dissemination of information on improved<br />

cultivars/technologies to NARS/NGOs/farmers in Asia<br />

Milestone: Nearly 20 students, scientists, apprentices, and technicians trained in various aspects of<br />

crop improvement, biotechnology, and crop management <strong>2010</strong><br />

Rationale<br />

Capacity building has been recognized as a priority item for enhanced use of technologies/capacities by<br />

researchers to develop and deploy products that meet the crop productivity demands.<br />

Capacity building Activities during <strong>2010</strong><br />

One PhD student (Srinivasan) from University of Western Australia worked on physiology, genetics<br />

and mapping of salt tolerance trait in chickpea graduated successfully during November <strong>2010</strong>. Another<br />

student (Viola) from University of Sydney is presently working on heat tolerance in chickpea. She has<br />

finished field screening for heat tolerance and controlled environment experiments on reproductive<br />

biology of selected heat tolerant and sensitive lines.<br />

PM Gaur, Nalini Mallikarjuna, Rajeev Varshney,<br />

L Krishnamurthy and Vincent Vadez<br />

Two groundnut researchers from DAR (Ms Phyu Phyu Moe and Ms Sein Leai Mon) have attended a<br />

three month training course at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> in groundnut breeding. One pigeonpea researcher (Ms Khin<br />

Lay Kyu) and one chickpea researcher (Ms Mar Mar Win) had training at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> leading to M.Sc<br />

and Ph.D degrees respectively. Ms Thi Thi Aung from the DAR rhizobium group continued her Ph.D<br />

program at Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand. (ACIAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> project).<br />

GV Ranga Rao, SN Nigam, PM Gaur and KB Saxena<br />

• Seven visiting fellows, including scientists and technicians from four countries of SAT Asia have<br />

undergone training on various aspects of “Groundnut Breeding Methodologies”<br />

• Three students have undergone training<br />

• Eleven entrepreneurs were trained on aspects of groundnut seed production and business<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

• Imparted training to three apprentices (Ashoka Chakravarthy B, Ramesh Krishnan R, and Madhavi<br />

L) on “Pathological and Molecular characterization of Rhizoctonia bataticola causing dry root rot<br />

of chickpea and Phytophthora drechsleri f. sp. cajani causal agent of pigeonpea blight”.<br />

• Imparted training to 20 participants on high throughput phenotyping of chickpea diseases under “Training course on<br />

Modern Breeding Methodologies for Chickpea Improvement” at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru.<br />

• Imparted training to 5 participants from Seed Companies (Maharashtra) under Groundnut and<br />

Chickpea field day for “Groundnut and Chickpea Varietal Development Research Consortium<br />

(GCVDRC) on Fusarium wilt resistance screening at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru.<br />

• Imparted training to 6 participants from JNKVV- Jabalpur on “Chickpea and Pigeonpea diseases”<br />

at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru.<br />

• Imparted training to 21 participants on Screening techniques for host resistance in chickpea:<br />

retrospective and perspective and controlled environment resistance screening for foliar diseases of<br />

chickpea under “Chickpea Pathology- Training course for newly appointed Plant Pathologist and<br />

refreshing courses for Senior Pathologist working in the AICRP on Chickpea” at IIPR Kanpur.<br />

• Imparted training to Dr Dibendu Datta, Principal Scientist from IIPR- Kanpur on “Pigeonpea wilt<br />

and SM diseases, field screening, identification and selection” at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>- Patancheru.<br />

Suresh Pande and Mamta Sharma<br />

312


Milestone: Nucleus/Breeder seed production of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred advanced breeding lines released in<br />

partner countries undertaken on request from NARS Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

To provide support for strengthening formal and informal seed systems<br />

Chickpea: A total 1.79 t breeder seed was produced for nine varieties, which included ICCC 37 (1900<br />

kg), ICCV 10 (990 kg), KAK 2 (1250 kg), JG 11 (3400 kg), JGK 1 (250 kg), JAKI 9218 (7000 kg), JG<br />

130 (500 kg), Vihar (1000 kg) and JG 14 (1650 kg)<br />

PM Gaur, Shailesh Tripathi and CLL Gowda<br />

Pigeonpea: In <strong>2010</strong>, a total of 1682 kg breeder seeds of 13 pure-line varieties (ICPL 87119, ICP 8863,<br />

ICPL 88039, ICP 7035, ICPL 87051, ICPL 96053, ICPL 85063, ICPL 20092, ICP 13092, ICPL 87091,<br />

ICPL 151, ICPL 161, and MN8) were distributed to various NARS partners from the Philippines,<br />

Nepal, Pakistan, Myanmar, Kenya, and India. Likewise, 1447 seed samples of 7 released varieties<br />

(ICPL 87119, ICP 8863, ICPL 88039, ICP 7035, ICPL 87051, ICPL 96053, and ICPL 85063) were<br />

shared with Brazil, India, Kenya, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, and USA.<br />

RK Srivastava, KB Saxena and MG Mula<br />

Groundnut: 2009/10 postrainy season: A total 34.27 t breeder seed of six groundnut varieties were<br />

produced of which 28.89 t was distributed to various public and private seed producing agencies for<br />

next stage seed multiplication. Small seed samples of these varieties, each of 2-3 kg was also<br />

distributed to 89 farmers on request.<br />

Table 4: Groundnut breeder seed produced and distributed during 2009/10.<br />

Variety Area(ha)<br />

Production<br />

(kg)<br />

Distribution<br />

(kg)<br />

ICGV 91114 18.0 22900 19200<br />

ICGS 44 2.0 2310 2250<br />

ICGS 76 1.0 1230 1120<br />

DRG 12 0.8 1140 1000<br />

ICGV 00350 2.6 5850 4570<br />

ICGV 87846 1.0 840 750<br />

Total 25.4 34270 28890<br />

<strong>2010</strong> rainy season: 1.6 t of Nucleus/Breeder seed of ICGV 91114 and ICGV 87846 was produced for<br />

further seed production purpose in the <strong>2010</strong>/11 postrainy season.<br />

In addition to the above, seeds of different varieties was provided to various partners as per below:<br />

• Seeds of 34 sets of international trials sets and 123 advanced breeding lines were provided to<br />

cooperators in 14 countries.<br />

• Under IFAD project seeds of three varieties were supplied to three collaborators. ICGV 91114<br />

(3000 kg), ICGS 44 (60 kg) and ICGS 76 (60 kg) was provided to OTELP; ICGV 91114 (600<br />

kg) to JTDC and ICGV 91114 (2000 kg) to RDT.<br />

• As part of TL II project seeds of varieties ICGV 87846 (2050 kg) and ICGV 00351 (500 kg)<br />

were provided to TNAU; and ICGV 00350 (3200 kg) to UAS collaborators. The seed of these<br />

varieties was produced and supplied to the collaborators for conduct of on-farm trials and<br />

further evaluation.<br />

Also supplied two sets each of XII ISGVT, XII IMGVT(SB), XII IMGVT(VB), XII<br />

IFDRGVT, XII ICGVT and VII IDRGVT to TNAU and three sets each of XII ISGVT, XII<br />

IMGVT(SB), XII IFDRGVT, XII ICGVT and VII IDRGVT to UAS for evaluation.<br />

• Two seed companies (Krishidhan Seeds Limited, Jalna and Nimbkar Seeds Private Limited,<br />

Phaltan) have renewed their membership to Seed Consortium for the year <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Milestone: Farmers’ field days, as and when needed, organized at special project locations (All<br />

scientists) Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

Imparting training to the farmers enables adoption of new varieties and technologies by the farmers that<br />

can be realized as increased production and quality of the crop produce.<br />

313


Seven field days were conducted in different villages in Kurnool district of AP by our partners. 1538<br />

men and 405 women participated in these fields’ days. Another three farmers’ days (at Uppugundur,<br />

Bollavarappadu and Kongapadu) were conducted in Prakasam district of AP. 98 men and 5 women<br />

attended these fields’ days. Eleven field days were conducted in Dharwad district of Karnataka during<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Totally 1605 people (1305 men and 300 women) participated in the field days.<br />

PM Gaur, CLL Gowda and NARS partners<br />

(VJayalakshmi, Y Satish, PM Salimath, DM Mannur)<br />

Six field days for farmers were organized in India and Nepal to showcase to the farmers the new<br />

improved varieties and technologies of groundnut.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Four chickpea field days involving 326 farmers; three pigeonpea field days with 191 farmers; and three<br />

groundnut field days with 83 farmers were organized in Myanmar under ACIAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> project.<br />

GV Ranga Rao, SN Nigam, PM Gaur and KB Saxena<br />

Field days for pigeonpea were organized to more than 1346 farmers, extension officials and village<br />

level workers from Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Gulbarga. The<br />

participants were trained in seed production technology, ICM, IPM and post harvest technologies.<br />

RK Srivastava, KB Saxena and MG Mula<br />

Milestone: Farmer-friendly literature on crop management and seed production technology published<br />

and distributed to NARS Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

To provide comprehensive information on improved cultivars and production technologies to the<br />

farmers.<br />

A chickpea seed production manual was published in English and Telugu.<br />

PM Gaur, S Tripathi, CLL Gowda, GV Ranga Rao,<br />

HC Sharma, S Pande, M Sharma and NARS partners<br />

Farmer-friendly literature on groundnut crop management and its seed production manual are published<br />

in English and vernacular languages (Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Gujarati, Nepali and Vietnamese) and<br />

made available to partners and other stakeholders.<br />

SN Nigam<br />

Extension material on pigeonpea, groundnut and chickpea production technologies and varieties have<br />

been developed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-DAR/MAS and shared with all the partners in the project area.<br />

GV Ranga Rao, SN Nigam, PM Gaur and KB Saxena<br />

A total of nine farmer friendly literature on pigeonpea cultivation and seed production technology,<br />

processing, storage, integrated crop management (ICM) technologies, and dal milling were produced in<br />

leaflet, brochure and in booklet forms in association with PDKV Akola, ANGRAU Hyderabad, Dept.<br />

of Agriculture-Uttrakhand. Of these, two bulletins are in Marathi, three in Telugu and three in Hindi.<br />

Details of these publications can be obtained from special project reports.<br />

RK Srivastava, KB Saxena and MG Mula<br />

Milestone: NARS scientists’ field days in sorghum, pigeonpea, groundnut, and chickpea organized<br />

Biannual<br />

Rationale<br />

To facilitate interactions between <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and NARS scientists and to provide opportunity to NARS<br />

partners for selection of breeding materials and germplasms of their interests.<br />

Chickpea: One field day was organized during January <strong>2010</strong> for the partners of Groundnut and<br />

Chickpea Varietal Development Research Consortium (GCVRDC). The partners selected breeding<br />

lines of their interests.<br />

PM Gaur and CLL Gowda<br />

314


Groundnut: NARS scientist’s field day was organized to showcase the improved lines and breeding<br />

populations for various important traits. This enabled the partner breeders to choose the materials as per<br />

their local requirements.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Pigeonpea: A total of 7 NARS scientist field days/training programs/exposure visits were conducted in<br />

India (Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, and Karnataka).Scientists were trained in seed<br />

production technology, post harvest technology to include processing and storage. Structured programs<br />

conducted in integrated disease and pest management (IPM) practices, and agronomy. Under various<br />

special projects, training was also imparted at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Center, Patancheru for scientists of Andhra<br />

Pradesh, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. Details of these activities can be found in special project<br />

reports.<br />

RK Srivastava and KB Saxena<br />

Milestone: Farmer-participatory varietal selection trials conducted on legumes to enhance adoption of<br />

improved cultivars Annual<br />

Rationale<br />

Involvement of farmers enables selection of varieties suitable for local preferences and their subsequent<br />

adoption of that variety in that area.<br />

Chickpea: FPVS trials were conducted on improved chickpea cultivars/elite lines in Andhra Pradesh<br />

and Karnataka states of India under Tropical Legumes II project. Taking into account farmer and<br />

market preferred traits, eight improved cultivars/breeding lines (4 desi + 4 kabuli) were selected for<br />

FPVS trials at each of the four project locations (Kurnool and Prakasam districts in Andhra Pradesh<br />

and Dharwad and Gulbarga districts in Karnataka). Twenty mother trials and 217 baby trials were<br />

conducted in 23 villages (5 to 8 villages in each district) to expose farmers to improved cultivars and<br />

allow them to select cultivars of their preference. A total of 1181 farmers (1052 male + 129 female)<br />

were involved in ranking of varieties in FPVS trials. The desi chickpea cultivars JG 11 and JAKI 9218<br />

were preferred in all four districts. In addition to these, desi chickpea cultivar JG 130 was preferred in<br />

both the districts of Andhra Pradesh, while desi chickpea cultivar BGD 103 was preferred in both the<br />

districts of Karnataka. Farmers in Prakasham district of Andhra Pradesh also preferred kabuli chickpea<br />

cultivar KAK 2. The traits for which these cultivars were preferred included, profuse podding, high<br />

productivity, early maturity, resistance to fusarium wilt, and market-preferred seed traits (e.g. medium<br />

seed size in desi type and large seed size in kabuli type).<br />

PM Gaur, CLL Gowda and NARS partners<br />

(VJayalakshmi, Y satish, PM Salimath, DM Mannur)<br />

Groundnut: Farmer-preferred varieties (FPVs) of groundnut were identified through FPVS trials in<br />

India, Nepal and Vietnam which include ICGV 91114 and ICGS 76 in India; Rajarshi, Baideshi and B4<br />

in Nepal; and L 14 and L 23, L26, D0401 in Vietnam. Varieties selected through farmers participatory<br />

research enabled both quick adoption of such a variety and the trial seed given to the farmer helped in<br />

its dissemination.<br />

SN Nigam and Venu Prasad<br />

Pigeonpea: In these trials scientists along with farmers selected varieties of their preference. In Orissa,<br />

India, a total of 6 ha were planted with ICPL 87119 and ICP 7035 intercrop with ragi and maize by 58<br />

farmers in 35 villages covering four districts. In Nepal, FPVs include ICP 7035, ICPL 86005, ICPL<br />

88039, and Rampur Rahar 1 were provided to 477 farmers covering 18 ha in the districts of Surkhet,<br />

Dailekh, Dang, Doti and Bajura. Details of these activities can be found in special project reports.<br />

RK Srivastava and KB Saxena<br />

Legumes in Myanmar: Potential cultivars have been evaluated and shared with farming communities<br />

in Magway, Mandalay and Sagaing divisions of Myanmar following participatory approach under<br />

ACIAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> collaborative project in Myanmar. Seed production of selected legume varieties in<br />

the concept of ‘village seed systems’ was established for the first time in Myanmar. In groundnut<br />

Sinpadatha 7 and 8; pigeonpea ICPL 96061 and Monywashwedinga and chickpea Yezin-4 and Yezin-8<br />

seed production was established in Laezin, Kyathaeaye, Sar-tine-kan and Shauk-kone villages covering<br />

2 ha each. A total of 3 tons of pigeonpea seed was produced under village seed banks and distributed to<br />

315


farmers to cover about 300 ha under these selected varieties in <strong>2010</strong>-11 season. Similarly 4 tons of<br />

chickpea variety Yezin-8 in Sagaing and Yezin-4 were produced in Mandalay division. Twenty nine<br />

tons of groundnut preferred varieties, Sinpadtha-7 and Sinpadtha-8 were produced in these three<br />

divisions.<br />

GV Ranga Rao, SN Nigam, KB Saxena and NARS partners<br />

Milestone: Insect pest and disease diagnostic tools and pest population dynamics models in relation to<br />

climatic changes developed 2011<br />

Rationale<br />

One of the problems in addressing pest management is inadequate knowledge about the factors<br />

influencing pest population dynamics. To understand pest dynamics several researchers collect pest<br />

surveillance data and related agricultural operations and other weather parameters. Correlations<br />

between some of these factors and pest incidence based on statistical models have been developed.<br />

However, a functionally viable model for pest forecast is still needed by farmers for efficient and<br />

effective pest management.<br />

Materials and Method<br />

Pest surveillance data collected at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on key pests of chickpea, pigeonpea and groundnut crops<br />

was correlated with daily weather in the farm.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Pest surveillance data generated from 1991 to 2008 at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on key pests of groundnut, chickpea<br />

and pigeonpea crops has been summarized according to standard week for detailed analysis. The data<br />

will be subjected to climate variability over years in order to make appropriate conclusions about the<br />

influence of climate variability on insect pest populations. The data need to be looked critically in<br />

collaboration with agro-climatologist to draw appropriate conclusions. This would be the prime activity<br />

for the coming years.<br />

GV Ranga Rao<br />

316


MTP Project 7:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Reducing Rural Poverty through Agricultural Diversification and Emerging<br />

Opportunities for High-Value Commodities and Products<br />

SP Wani<br />

Output 7.1: African Market Garden technology strategy and knowledge database, developed, tested and<br />

promulgated with associated capacity development regionally in the SAT of the Sahel in collaboration with<br />

AVRDC and ICRAF and assessed in comparison with existing and new potential dryland alternatives<br />

Activity 7.1.1. Comparison between four water delivery methods for irrigation in Niger<br />

For market gardening in Africa, four common approaches for water lifting to irrigate viz. hand<br />

lifting, treadle pumps, motor pumps and solar pumps were assessed. The water lifting technologies<br />

were supposed to lift water from a depth of 5 m to irrigate a hectare in Niger over a period of 200<br />

days/year.<br />

The annual amortization of the solar pumping system is lower than lifting water by hand, or using motor pumps<br />

(Table 1). The treadle pump is the most economic alternative at current cost levels but it is not sustainable in<br />

West Africa due to frequent breakdowns that are not repaired. The costs of solar pumping systems are expected<br />

to decrease even more. At a cost of 2800 US$ for the solar pumping system it becomes more economic than the<br />

treadle pump (at labor cost of 2 US$ per day).<br />

Table 1. Economic comparison of different water supply alternatives used in Niger for irrigation at two<br />

labor costs: US$2 and 1 US$ per man day<br />

Hand lifting Treadle pump Motor pump Solar pump<br />

apptechdesign.org/<br />

qty<br />

unit<br />

cost total amortz qty<br />

unit<br />

cost total amortz qty<br />

unit<br />

cost total amortz qty<br />

unit<br />

cost total amortz<br />

$ $ $/year $ $ $/year $ $ $/year $ $ $/year<br />

Equipment 3 10 30 15 1 70 70 18 1 400 400 80 1 3,800 3,800 380<br />

Well 3 30 90 23 1 100 100 10 1 200 200 20 1 200 200 20<br />

Water distr. network 0 0 1 75 75 8 1 100 100 10 1 100 100 10<br />

Maintenance 3 11 40 10<br />

Fuel 0 0 480 0<br />

Labor@2 $/manday 556 2 1,111 139 2 278 20 5<br />

Labor@1 $/manday 556 1 556 139 1 139 10 3<br />

Total 1,152 324 660 428<br />

@Labor 2$/day<br />

Total 596 185 640 423<br />

@Labor 1$/day<br />

General assumptions<br />

Water need: 80 m 3 /day/hectare for 200 days/year equals 4,000 m 3 /year<br />

Site characteristics: assume >40 m 3 /hr well recharge, water table at 5m depth<br />

Well types: Hand dug well at 30US$ lifetime 4 years; Washboard well 50 US$; Tube well at 200 US$ lifetime 10 years<br />

Water distribution network: Underground pvc pipe system from pump to multiple field outlets used to irrigate 800 m 2 area<br />

Hand Lifting: at 5m depth Q= 0.25 L/s= 7.2 m 3 /day/person. Hand dug well. Require 3 water lifting points.<br />

Treadle pump: Q= 1 L/s= 28.8 m 3 /day/person. Washboard well. Requires 1 water lifting point.<br />

Motor pump: 3 hp uses 0.12 Liter of fuel to move 1m 3 water. Fuel cost 1 US$/liter. Tube well. Labor 1h/day<br />

Solar pump: Tubewell. Installation cost 3800US$ incl import, transport and installation. Labor 0.25h/day<br />

Lifetime Hand lifting 2, Treadle pump 4, Motor pump 5 and Solar pump 10 years<br />

1 US$= 500 CFA<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

317<br />

L Woltering and D Pasternak


Activity 7.1.2. Low head drip irrigation for farmers in Niger: a technical evaluation<br />

Various companies, notably Chapin of the US that produces thin drip tapes with inserted drip emitters and the<br />

US NGO called IDE (International Development Enterprise) that use micro-tubes to replace drip emitters are<br />

advocating “affordable” small scale drip systems. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> on the other hand promotes highest quality drip line<br />

to guarantee long term sustainability and water distribution reliability. These are produced by the Naandan-Jain<br />

company. A comparison of the hydraulic performance of the three systems was carried out. Drip laterals of the<br />

three types were connected to 200 litres water barrel with adjustable height to give a range of water pressures.<br />

Drip discharge was measured for each of the three options at 0.3 m intervals. Lateral length was increased<br />

stepwise every 5 meters after a set of measurements were taken.<br />

Drip discharge for the 3 systems at four rates of water pressure and at various lateral length are Given in Figure<br />

1. The hydraulic performance of the IDE system was totally unsatisfactory. The very high drip discharge<br />

actually negates the main advantages of low pressure drip that is a relatively low rate of discharge. High rates of<br />

discharge results in leaching of soluble nutrients below the root level. Furthermore the drip discharge of the IDE<br />

system varied considerable with distance from the water source undermining a very important principle of drip<br />

irrigation that is water distribution uniformity. The hydraulic performance of both the Chapin and the Naandan<br />

Jain systems was very satisfactory. The Chapin system however is based on thin walled tubes that disintegrate<br />

within two years of installation whereas the Naandan Jain system has a life span of more than 10 years.<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

(a) H=2m<br />

Jain<br />

Dtape<br />

IDE<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

(b) H=1.5m<br />

Jain<br />

Dtape<br />

IDE<br />

q (L/hr)<br />

3<br />

2<br />

q (L/hr)<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Lateral Length (m)<br />

0<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Lateral Length (m)<br />

(c) H=1m<br />

(d) H=0.5m<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Jain<br />

Dtape<br />

IDE<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Jain<br />

D Tape<br />

IDE<br />

q (L/hr)<br />

3<br />

2<br />

q (L/hr)<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1<br />

0<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Lateral Length (m)<br />

0<br />

5 10 15 20<br />

Lateral Length (m)<br />

Figure 1. Water discharge from three drip systems as a function of distance from the water source and<br />

water pressure<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

L Woltering, Ibrahim Ali and D Pasternak<br />

318


Activity 7.1.3. The economic performance of the AMG compared with farmers’ practice (FM) and<br />

improved management (IM)<br />

Low-pressure drip irrigation is promoted in Sub Saharan Africa as an alternative to traditional methods of small<br />

scale irrigation of vegetables. The African Market Garden (AMG) is a horticultural production system for small<br />

holders based on low-pressure drip irrigation combined with an improved crop management package. An<br />

experiment was conducted on-station in Niger on three adjacent 500 m 2 plots in a sandy acid soil. Crop<br />

productivity was greatly improved when traditional practices were substituted by improved management<br />

practices. The AMG gave the highest crop yields for okra and eggplant. The AMG gave in all cases higher<br />

returns to investment than the treatments irrigated with watering cans. Labor accounts for up to 45% of the<br />

production cost in vegetable gardens irrigated by hand, where 75% of the producer time is spent on irrigation.<br />

The total labor requirement for the drip irrigated AMG was on an average 1.4 person hours per day against 5.3<br />

person hours per day for the farmer practice on a 500 m² garden. Return to labor is at least double for the AMG<br />

against the other treatments. The returns to land from eggplant were found to be US$ 1.7, 0.8 and 0.1 per m 2 for<br />

the AMG, IM and FP respectively. The return to water is around US$ 2 per cubic meter. In the FP, returns to<br />

water are marginal for okra and eggplant.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

L Woltering, D Pasternak and Ibrahim Ali<br />

Activity 7.1.4. Trainings on micro irrigation, improved vegetable and seed production<br />

Research has demonstrated that by improving the management of vegetables crops even while using the<br />

watering-can technology one can double vegetables yields. In an effort for scaling up, training in IM was<br />

imparted to a total of 3,200 producers by the end of <strong>2010</strong> which later on was followed up for project technicians.<br />

A high level course on low and high pressure drip irrigation was given to engineers from 4 countries in West<br />

Africa.<br />

Following 9 years of research and development the AMG is now ready for up-scaling. Indeed during the coming<br />

two years we are expecting to see the installation of about 450 hectares of AMG in Senegal, Benin and Niger.<br />

This should directly affect the livelihood of about 70,000 people. The AMG is now being disseminated in many<br />

Sahelian countries without the intervention of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Table 2. Training events on Vegetables production management and on drip irrigation during <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Training Courses<br />

Event, Topic, Date/Scientist<br />

March<br />

Septem<br />

ber<br />

Regional training on drip<br />

irrigation<br />

D Pasternak/L Woltering<br />

Training on onion seeds<br />

production<br />

S Kumar, I Houseini, D<br />

Pasternak<br />

Venue Participant Participating<br />

centers/Institutes<br />

ISC 25 ADESCA, IAMGOLD<br />

IER/CRRA, IER, PCD<br />

Direction Nationale de<br />

l’Agriculture, Mali,<br />

ACH, MANOMA SA,<br />

Mission Internationale<br />

la Vie, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

ISC 12 SNV, FRUPOAM<br />

Resources &<br />

Collaborative<br />

Support<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>,<br />

IPALAC<br />

Farmers training on improved<br />

vegetables production.<br />

Dov Pasternak/<br />

Navid/technicians<br />

Farmers training on improved<br />

vegetables production.<br />

Dov Pasternak/<br />

Navid/technicians<br />

Field<br />

training<br />

Field<br />

training<br />

1,600 ARZIKI, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> USAID through<br />

CLUSA<br />

1,600 ARZIKI, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> USAID through<br />

CLUSA<br />

D Pasternak, L Woltering, S Kumar, Houseini, Navid and technicians<br />

319


Activity 7.1.5. The Sahelian Eco-Farm (SEF)<br />

The Objective of the SEF was to develop a rainfed production system with higher profitability than the existing<br />

cereal-legume production systems. Two models were tested over a period of seven years,<br />

Model 1- This model is based on planting of Pomme du Sahel trees in demilunes connected by soil trenches. The<br />

trees are intercropped with cowpeas and with watermelons.<br />

Model 2 - This model is based on hedges of Acacia colei spaced at 20X4 m interval. The trees are intercropped with<br />

millet, cowpeas and Roselle on a rotation basis. An economic analysis of the two models was carried out using data<br />

collected over a period of 5 years.<br />

The net present value of model 2 was similar that of the traditional grain/legume system of the Sahel. However<br />

income in model 1 was significantly higher than income from a traditional system.<br />

Figure 2. Net present values over different time horizons<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Sahel region<br />

D Pasternak<br />

Activity 7.1.6. Vegetables research<br />

Most vegetable varieties used in the Sahel are imported from Europe. Most are not adapted to the local climate, soils<br />

and cultivation methods. Over a period of 9 years, <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, later joined by AVRDC has been selecting, purifying<br />

and breeding new vegetable varieties for the Sahel with an objective of replacing/stopping import of seeds from<br />

Europe.<br />

Table 3 gives the names and traits of 14 varieties/lines selected, purified and bred by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/AVRDC. These<br />

varieties are being disseminated by small vegetables seeds producers trained by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/AVRDC while foundation<br />

seeds are being produced at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Niger.<br />

320


Table 3. Vegetable varieties selected and improved by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>/AVRDC<br />

Species Varieties Origin Traits Popularity<br />

Tomatoes<br />

Lettuce<br />

Okra<br />

Melons<br />

Cucumbers<br />

Hot Pepper<br />

Sweet<br />

Pepper<br />

Sweet Corn<br />

Carrots<br />

Watermelons<br />

Moringa<br />

Onions<br />

Icrixina Xina variety Rainy season variety, very<br />

high yields<br />

Sadore<br />

Hazera<br />

germplasm<br />

Maya Dr. Dov<br />

Globerson<br />

Konni Selection from<br />

local land race<br />

Very firm fruit, long shelf<br />

life, very high quality<br />

Bolting tolerant, year round,<br />

high yield, high quality<br />

Very early, short bush, high<br />

yielding, good quality<br />

Ein Dor Israel Very heat tolerant, very<br />

tasty, high yield<br />

Bet Alpha Israel High yield, heat tolerant,<br />

tasty, short shelf life<br />

Safi Senegal Very high yields, long<br />

production season, very<br />

Diffa Selection from<br />

local land race<br />

pungent<br />

Lamuyo type, tolerant to<br />

poor growing conditions,<br />

used for drying<br />

Main rainy season tomato<br />

in Niger<br />

To be released in 2011<br />

Spreading fast in Niger<br />

Spreading fast in Niger,<br />

good for rain-fed<br />

production<br />

Spreading fast in Niger<br />

Spreading fast in Niger<br />

Spreading<br />

Fast in Niger<br />

Released in <strong>2010</strong><br />

True Gold USA High yield, heat tolerant Gaining in popularity for<br />

rainy season<br />

Uberlandia Brazil Produces seeds in the Sahel To be released in 2011,<br />

Malali Israel Very tasty, high yield, Limited spread<br />

drought tolerant<br />

PKM 1 Selection from Very high yield, vary tasty Spreading very fast in<br />

Two lines of<br />

Violet de Galmi<br />

Indian variety<br />

Selection from<br />

among 50 lines<br />

Line 28 with long storage<br />

life, line 13 with high yields<br />

Niger<br />

To be released in 2011<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

S Kumar and D Pasternak<br />

Activity 7.1.7. Fruit trees research- Dissemination of Pomme du Sahel<br />

Pomme du Sahel is the name given by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to the domesticated Ziziphus mauritiana called Ber in India.<br />

Dissemination of Pomme du Sahel through the production of grafted trees at the nursery level and second through<br />

grafting of mature wild Ziziphus trees with Pomme du Sahel scions is evaluated. The latter technology is preferable<br />

because there is no need to care for young plants until they bear fruit four years late. Grafted mature wild Ziziphus<br />

give fruit six months after grafting. The income from a mature grafted tree is $20/year. Pomme du Sahel has spread<br />

very fast in Niger. Hundreds of thousands trees were planted with a period of seven years and its fruit is now sold in<br />

all major markets of Niger<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger<br />

321


Activity 7.1.8. Research on Gum Arabic production with Acacia senegal<br />

Acacia senegal a drought tolerant and commonly planted in many countries on degraded lands produces the gum<br />

arabic, which is an international trade product. Experiment on tapping intensity was conducted in a plantation<br />

established in 1993 and data on gum yield collected over five years from 2004 to 2008 on 123 trees. A repeated<br />

measurement analysis was used compare individual trees based on gum yield.<br />

Gum yield is very variable among trees during the same year and between years. The highest average gum yield<br />

recorded over the five years is 814 g. Grouping of trees in yield classes indicates that over a period of five years<br />

18% of the trees produced 500 to 899 g gum yr -1 tree -1 . Two percent of the trees did not produce any gum, while<br />

27% of the trees produced


especially where technical backstopping is provided. Respondents in both locations regard the education of their<br />

children as a priority concern.<br />

It is not surprising for women-respondents to have significant role in agricultural activities while attending to their<br />

domestic role. Planting, weeding, spraying, and harvesting are operations regarded as extremely difficult in<br />

Kothapally while land preparation, planting and harvesting in Urella.<br />

Most were aware of the check dams (51%), vermicomposting (49%) and the provision of seeds and planting<br />

materials (34%). However, in terms of the importance of these to their immediate households and community,<br />

responses varied. For instance, more than one half of those who were aware of the check dams regarded this as ‘not<br />

important’ directly for their household but ‘extremely important’ for the community. The over-all assessment<br />

whether the interventions had contributed in elevating women-respondents’ quality of life revealed viewpoints of<br />

positive impact (51%) where agricultural productivity improved to a large extent (31%). Mean income of womenrespondents<br />

from primary source was significant at 10% level of significance among those with ages of


Table 4. Effect of tillage and crop residue additions on maize yield in two cropping systems during Kharif<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Crop residue<br />

Maize - Chickpea Maize/pigeonpea<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Minimum tillage Residues added 5.6 6.1<br />

No residues added 6.8 5.3<br />

Mean 6.2 5.7<br />

Normal tillage Residues added 6.2 5.1<br />

No residues added 6.2 5.7<br />

Mean 6.2 5.4<br />

Mean - residue added 5.9 5.6<br />

Mean - no residue added 6.5 5.5<br />

LSD ( 5%) for tillage = 0.46 t ha -1 , residue = 0.46 t ha -1 , Cropping systems = 0.34 t ha -1 , Tiilage x residue<br />

= 0.66 t ha -1 and tillage, residue x cropping systems = 0.81 t ha -1<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CRIDA<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Sehgal Foundation and Ministry of Agriculture, GOI<br />

Piara Singh, SP Wani, P Pathak, Ram A Jat, Girish Chander,<br />

L Mohan Reddy, Kiara Winans and Uttam Kumar<br />

Activity 7.2.3. Enhance water use efficiency (WUE) of supplemental irrigation in the rainfed production<br />

systems.<br />

Water scarcity and low water productivity of production systems are the major problems limiting crop<br />

production in rainfed systems. A long-term experiment was initiated in BW 5 watershed at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>,<br />

Patancheru to enhance the water use efficiency of rainfall and supplemental irrigation of cropping systems with<br />

adoption of appropriate land, crop and water management practices on the Vertisols. The BW5 watershed<br />

experiment comprise of two land forms (flat and BBF), two methods of irrigation (flood and drip) and two levels<br />

of crop management (farmers’ level of soil fertility and optimum level of soil fertility management). The<br />

cropping system being evaluated is maize (rainy season)-chickpea (post-rainy season)-vegetables (summer<br />

season).<br />

During 2009, landforms did not affect yield of maize and chickpea. Improved soil fertility increased yield of<br />

maize by 20% and of chickpea by 12% (Table 5). Land management x fertility management interaction for<br />

chickpea yield was significant. During summer season of <strong>2010</strong>, drip irrigation increased the yield of okra by<br />

36% and BBF system by 17% over the flat landform. Drip irrigation was more effective on BBF than on flat<br />

landform and increased the yield by 32%. There was no difference between BBF and flat under flood irrigation.<br />

Farmers’ practice of soil fertility management (application of FYM) gave about 14% higher okra yield than the<br />

improved practice (balanced nutrition with chemical fertilizers). During <strong>2010</strong> (high rainfall year), BBF increased<br />

the yield of maize by 26% over the flat landform. Improved soil fertility management increased the maize yield<br />

by 9%. Maize yields were 42% higher in plots where drip irrigation was given in the summer season to okra.<br />

These results indicate that BBF system, improved soil fertility management and summer cropping are<br />

contributing towards increasing water use and water use efficiency. These results showed that BBF system along<br />

with integrated nutrient management and drip irrigation enhanced the productivity and water use efficiency of<br />

the production systems being evaluated. These results are to be further confirmed in the following seasons.<br />

324


Table 5. Yield of crops in BW5 watershed during 2009-10 and <strong>2010</strong>-11 cropping seasons.<br />

Maize<br />

yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Chickpea<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Season : 2009-10<br />

Maize + chickpea<br />

MEY<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Okra<br />

yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Season : <strong>2010</strong>-<br />

11<br />

Maize yield<br />

(t ha -1 )<br />

Irrigation Land Mgmt<br />

Improved management<br />

Drip BBF 4.5 1.4 7.9 2.2 5.2<br />

Flat 5.0 1.5 8.6 1.8 3.6<br />

Flood BBF 4.3 1.2 7.2 1.4 3.1<br />

Flat 4.3 1.3 7.5 1.5 3.5<br />

Mean 4.5 1.4 7.8 1.7 3.8<br />

Framers management<br />

Drip BBF 4.1 1.3 7.3 2.6 5.6<br />

Flat 4.2 1.2 7.1 1.8 3.0<br />

Flood BBF 3.8 1.2 6.7 1.7 2.7<br />

Flat 2.9 1.2 5.8 1.6 3.0<br />

Mean 3.8 1.2 6.7 1.9 3.5<br />

LSD (0.05) 1.79 0.25 1.77 0.60 1.91<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Sustainable Agriculture Initiative<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Jain Irrigation, Jalgaon, India<br />

Piara Singh, S P Wani, P Pathak, Gajanan L Sawargaonkar,<br />

Girish Chander and L Mohan Reddy<br />

Activity 7.2.4. Assessing long-term impacts of SWNM options on crop productivity for sustainable<br />

management of Vertic Inceptisols watersheds.<br />

Vertic Inceptisols occupy about 72 million hectares of land in India. Land degradation, waterlogging, runoff and soil<br />

erosion, nutrient mining are the major constraints limiting the productivity of the soybean-based production systems<br />

to 1.0 t ha -1 . Since 2004-05, two cropping systems (soybean/pigeonpea intercrop and maize-chickpea sequential<br />

systems) are being evaluated with improved (BBF + crop residues +20 kg P ha -1 ) and traditional (sowing on flat +<br />

20 kg P ha -1 ) management. Overall, with improved management, the yields of soybean/ pigeonpea intercrop systems<br />

increased by 7-15% and that of maize-chickpea sequential system by 6-23%, indicating that the benefits of improved<br />

management are more for the non-legume system. Also the yield benefits were on the shallow soil than on the<br />

medium-deep soil. During 2009-10 (drought year), the soybean crop failed, whereas the maize and safflower grain<br />

yields averaged 1420 kg ha -1 and 820 kg ha -1 , respectively. Improved management gave 5 to 10% increase in system<br />

productivity over the traditional management. These studies have shown that the productivity of soybean and maizebased<br />

systems can be at least doubled with efficient use of resources on these soils.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CRIDA<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Sehgal Foundation<br />

Piara Singh, S P Wani, P Pathak, L Mohan Reddy and KL Sahrawat<br />

325


Activity 7.2.5. Benefits and tradeoffs of agricultural water interventions at the watershed and catchment scale<br />

This study analyzed the impact of in-situ and ex-situ agricultural water management on water resources availability,<br />

soil loss and crop yields at upstream location and consequent impacts on downstream locations. The impacts of<br />

various soil and water management interventions in the watershed were compared to non-intervention state during a<br />

30-year simulation period by application of the calibrated and validated ARCSWAT 2005 modelling tool.<br />

Methodology is first tested at Kothapally watershed (3 km 2 ) and same approach is implemented for Osman Sagar<br />

catchment area (736 km 2 ).<br />

Watershed management programmes including in-situ water harvesting and ex-situ harvesting in check-dams<br />

significantly changed water resources availability in watersheds. Check-dams helped in storing water for<br />

groundwater recharge, which can be used for irrigation, as well for minimizing soil loss. In-situ water management<br />

practices improved infiltration capacity and water holding capacity of the soil, which resulted in increased water<br />

availability and better crop yields. Water outflows from the developed watershed was more than halved as compared<br />

to no-intervention stage, indicating portion of runoff retention in the watershed, reduced soil loss, reducing potential<br />

threat of flooding downstream areas while upgrading rain-fed agriculture, improving productivity and livelihood of<br />

farmers in upland areas and also addressing the issues of poverty, equity and gender in watersheds. Watershed<br />

interventions in agriculture in the forms of in-situ and ex-situ water harvesting systems are important for<br />

strengthening the resilience to drought in tropical agriculture in uplands which are the hot spots of poverty, water<br />

scarcity and land degradation. Reduced water flows to the downstream areas could be affected with large scale<br />

development of watersheds in the upstream areas. There is need to study the tradeoffs between the goal of poverty<br />

reduction in upland areas and water flows for downstream areas further.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm, Sweden<br />

KK. Garg and SP Wani<br />

Activity 7.2.6. Biological nitrification inhibition in sorghum rhizosphere soil<br />

Sorghum (including sweet sorghum) has the ability to release chemical substances from their roots that can suppress<br />

the nitrifer activity and soil nitrification, and this phenomenon is termed as biological nitrification inhibition (BNI).<br />

We need to obtain evidence of the existence of BNI function under field conditions and clarify how soil properties<br />

affect the BNI.<br />

Sorghum cultivars (PVK801, NTJ-2, CSH-16, HTJH3201 and CSH22SS) were cultivated in the kharif season in<br />

three experimental fields with different soils (2 Alfisols and 1 Vertisols). Soil around the roots was collected<br />

periodically and nitrification activities in the soil samples were measured by a soil incubation method.<br />

The nitrification activity in the rhizosphere soil of NTJ 2 was significantly lower than the bare soil (+N) in Alfisol 1<br />

at 3rd sampling (Table 6). The nitrification activity in the rhizosphere soil of CSH22SS was significantly lower than<br />

the bare soil (+N) in Alfisol 2 at 3rd sampling. Although the nitrification activities in the other samples were not<br />

significantly different, the nitrification activities in the rhizosphere soils of the 4 grain sorghums and 1 sweet<br />

sorghum were tended to be lower than those in the bare soil (–N and +N) in Alfisols 1 and 2 at 3rd sampling. The<br />

nitrification activities were not significantly different among the samples in Alfisols 1 and 2 at 1st and 2nd<br />

samplings. In Vertisol 1, the nitrification activities were not significantly different among the samples for all the 3<br />

samplings. The nitrification activity and soil pH (H 2 O) showed positive correlation (P


Table 6. Nitrification activities of the soil samples (unit: mg N/ kg dry soil/ day)<br />

Alfisol 1 Alfisol 2 Vertisol 1<br />

Initial 1st § 2nd § 3rd Initial 1st § 2nd § 3rd Initial 1st § 2nd § 3rd §<br />

Bare soil − N 5.5 9.3 6.9 6.1ab 5.1 9.6 8.5 6.3abc 13.1 10.9 0.8 10.4<br />

+ N 8.8 6.1 6.6a 9.6 8.2 6.6ab 18.7 9.0 12.0<br />

CSH22SS 10.6 8.1 3.7ab 10.3 6.8 2.7c<br />

29.6 5.5 11.5<br />

CSH16 9.3 7.4 4.3ab 12.2 7.8 4.3bc 19.1 3.9 13.4<br />

Soil<br />

PVK801 11.6 7.9 4.5ab 14.8 10.8 6.2abc 18.5 0.4 10.8<br />

around<br />

NTJ2 8.6 7.1 3.3b<br />

9.7 9.6 4.2bc 14.0 4.7 13.2<br />

the roots<br />

HTJH3201 9.0 8.6 5.0ab 13.1 9.6 4.8abc 18.9 5.2 11.5<br />

86M64 10.4 6.8 5.9ab no-data 9.2 8.2a 24.1 5.5 11.1<br />

CSH22SS 10.4 8.2 5.4ab 10.4 7.7 5.8abc 18.6 1.3 10.7<br />

CSH16 10.4 8.0 4.5ab 11.4 8.8 6.3abc 30.9 3.6 11.1<br />

PVK801 13.1 9.1 5.5ab 10.2 8.8 6.5ab 19.7 4.0 11.5<br />

Bulk soil<br />

NTJ2 10.8 7.8 4.9ab 9.6 10.7 6.9ab 22.8 10.5 13.2<br />

HTJH3201 11.5 8.9 5.6ab 10.4 9.5 5.1abc 26.5 5.9 9.4<br />

86M64 11.1 9.0 5.7ab no-data 10.0 7.3ab 12.6 2.9 12.3<br />

:V alues in a colum n follow ed by he sam e letter are not significantly different using a Tukey's m ultiple com parison<br />

(P


Figure. 4. Nitrous oxide emissions from alfisols cultivated with sweet sorghum. The vertical bars show the<br />

range of flux in triplicate measurements.<br />

High N 2 O emissions were noticed after the application of nitrogen fertilizer for two weeks. The emissions of N 2 O<br />

after the application of nitrogen fertilizer suggests that nitrification of the applied nitrogen fertilizer had taken place.<br />

Based on this preliminary result alone it is difficult to conclude that there is no BNI activity in sweet sorghum.<br />

Factors such as soil pH, temperature, physiological stage etc., may be influencing BNI activity and which needs to<br />

be looked upon.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

K Ramu, T Watanabe, H Uchino,<br />

SP Wani, O Ito and KL Sahrawat<br />

Activity 7.2.8. Monitoring occurrence of various pesticide residues in high value crops and ecosystem.<br />

High value crops cover only in 10% of the area, but consume more than 75% of the total pesticides. This<br />

injudicious use created the problem of residues in food chain. The information on the occurrence of the toxic<br />

residues in various natural resources (soil and water) and crops is of high value to develop management<br />

strategies.<br />

To address the above issue an on-farm study was taken up leading to Ph.D program under ANGRAU. Among the<br />

food crops and cotton analyzed for presence of insecticide residues (monocrotophos, chlorpyriphos, alpha<br />

endosulfan, beta endosulfan and cypermethrin), one rice grain sample out of 5 samples collected from Kothapally<br />

(IPM village) was contaminated and among the soil samples, residues were detected from maize and rice fields<br />

of Enkepally (Non-contact village).<br />

Out of the total 45 tomato fruit samples from Kothapally analyzed for insecticide residues over a period of five<br />

seasons (2008-10), 11 samples (24%) were found to contain residues. In Enkepally village, the residues were<br />

observed in 50% of samples (15 out of 30 samples) during this period. However, none of the samples from<br />

Kothapally and 7% of contaminated samples from Enkepally had residues above MRLs.<br />

Among the 40 brinjal samples analyzed, 17 (17%) samples from Kothapally and 29 (73%) samples from the<br />

Enkepally contained insecticide residues. The overall residue levels in brinjal during the study period indicated<br />

7% of samples in Enkepally above MRLs.<br />

None of the water samples collected from Kothapally (food crops, cotton and vegetable crops) was contaminated<br />

with residues.<br />

328


The adoption of IPM in Kothapally for a decade resulted in rectifying their contaminated soils and water from<br />

pesticides. All the water from open and bore wells and soil samples from various fields were found free from<br />

pesticide residues.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

ANGRAU<br />

G V Ranga Rao, K L Sahrawat and Suhas P Wani<br />

Activity 7.2.9. Balanced nutrient management involving sulphur, boron and zinc evaluated and developed<br />

The emerging widespread deficiencies of S, B and Zn in the rainfed SAT are apparently holding back the realization<br />

of existing productivity potential and resulting inefficient utilization of existing available water resources leading to<br />

low rain water use efficiency (RWUE). Present scenario so demands attention to evaluate and develop fertilization<br />

practice involving S, B and Zn to boost productivity and crops ability to enhanced productive transpiration. Keeping<br />

this in view, a long term experiment was started since 2007 to evaluate the frequency (Once in a year, once in 2<br />

years, once in 3 years) and dose (Full and 50%) of S, B and Zn with soybean-sorghum and maize-chickpea cropping<br />

systems. The effects of different practices were recorded on soybean and maize productivity during rainy season<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Full dose of S + B + Zn comprised 200 kg gypsum (30 kg S) + 5 kg borax (0.5 kg B) + 50 kg ZnSO 4 (10 kg<br />

Zn). The secondary and micronutrients were applied to rainy season crop as per the treatment.<br />

The findings of the study proved without doubt the role of S, B and Zn application in crop productivity improvement<br />

in soybean and maize crops. The applied S, B and Zn increased soybean grain productivity over the only application<br />

of recommended N and P by 24-37% in application once in a year, 18-24% in application once in 2 years and 7% in<br />

application once in 3 years. The maximum grain and straw productivity was observed with 50% SBZn applied every<br />

year which seems the best S, B and Zn application strategy. Regular annual additions of lower dose of limiting<br />

secondary and micronutrients regulated optimum nutrition for realizing best productivity. As regards application of<br />

SBZn once in 2 or 3 years, the full dose recorded the best productivity. The next best alternative of SBZn<br />

application, from productivity and % increase over only NP application, seems their application once in 2 years<br />

rather than once in 3 years. The SBZn application once in 2 years recorded 24% increase over only NP while SBZN<br />

application once in 3 years recorded only 7% increase over only NP application. Similar results were recorded in<br />

maize crop.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Girish Chander, Suhas P Wani and KL Sahrawat<br />

Activity 7.2.10. Integrated nutrient management (INM) involving deoiled Jatropha cake evaluated and developed<br />

In context of present scenario, biofuel is considered as a strategy to mitigate the impacts of global warming driven<br />

climate change through carbon sequestration. Jatropha as a biofuel plant is a good candidate as it is drought tolerant,<br />

its seeds have > 30% oil, the plants are not browsed by cattle and goats, and hence recommended for the<br />

rehabilitation of open degraded lands. The by-product deoiled cake (after oil extraction) being non-edible, but rich in<br />

nutrients finds its use in INM options for crop production. Therefore studies were conducted during rainy season<br />

<strong>2010</strong> with soybean and maize crops to evaluate the deoiled cake as a source of nutrients on basis of replacing 50 or<br />

100% of basal N requirement. The other recommended nutrients were also adjusted taking into account the addition<br />

through the cake. The recommended N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O for maize were 120:60:40 kg ha -1 and for soybean 30:60:40 kg ha -<br />

1 . Fifty per cent of recommended N in maize and full recommended N in soybean was added as basal application.<br />

The results clearly documented the benefits in integrated nutrient management involving chemical fertilizers and<br />

organic deoiled Jatropha cake. In soybean crop, addition of cake on basis of replacing 50% of basal N through cake<br />

proved the best practice. Probably this practice fits well in meeting the twin objectives of meeting N requirement in<br />

soybean in initial stages in immediately available form and increasing fertilizer use efficiency due to use of organics.<br />

The addition of 50% of basal N through cake in soybean recorded 27% increase in grain yield over sole use of<br />

329


chemical fertilizers. On the contrary, in maize crop, replacing whole of the basal N requirement through Jatropha<br />

cake proved the best practice. Replacement of basal N through cake recorded an increase in grain yield by 8% over<br />

basal N through sole use of chemical fertilizers.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

IFAD and D1 plantation<br />

Girish Chander, Suhas P Wani, KL Sahrawat<br />

Activity 7.2.11. Farmer participatory evaluation of site specific nutrient management (SSNM) involving<br />

secondary and micronutrients in Andhra Pradesh<br />

Site specific nutrient management involves the most efficient use of nutrient inputs in bringing in the best possible<br />

economic productivity improvement. Therefore, during rainy season <strong>2010</strong>, the trials were conducted with farmers<br />

who were issued soil health cards in 8 target districts. The fertilizer recommendations were adjusted as per the soil<br />

analysis results of the selected farmers’ fields.<br />

The site specific nutrient management increased ground nut pod yield by 25%, greengram yield by 14%, cotton<br />

yield by 41% and sorghum yield by 22% over the farmers practice indicating the superiority and rationale of<br />

adopting SSNM (Table 7).<br />

Table 7. Effect of SSNM on crop yields in rainfed districts of Andhra Pradesh, India rainy season, <strong>2010</strong><br />

Pod/Grain Yield (kg/ha)<br />

District<br />

Crop<br />

FP<br />

BN<br />

% Increase<br />

Nalgonda Groundnut 1404 1749 25<br />

Rangareddy Greengram 1467 1673 14<br />

Warangal Cotton 1729 2432 41<br />

Adilabad Sorghum 2273 2773 22<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CRIDA, KVK (Adilabad, Nalgonda), WASSAN, MARI, BIRD, CWS, AAKRUTI<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

NAIP, ICAR<br />

Suhas P Wani, Girish Chander and KL Sahrawat<br />

Activity 7.2.12. Farmer participatory soil test based nutrient management evaluated and demonstrated<br />

A range of trials were conducted in rainfed semi arid regions of Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan states in India<br />

(Table 8). The focus was to demonstrate and evaluate the nutrient management strategies – balanced nutrition (BN)<br />

including deficient secondary and micro nutrients; Integrated nutrient management (INM) involving secondary and<br />

micro nutrients plus vermicompost; Residual effects of secondary and micronutrients; BN in rainy fallows with<br />

common land form management; effect of slow release B fertilizer-Boromag. In addition the best bet practice (BN<br />

plus improved cultivar) was scaled up in farmers fields. Two land form management technologies were evaluated<br />

for double cropping in rainy fallow regions.<br />

330


Table 8. Detail of participatory nutrient management trials demonstrated and evaluated in Madhya Pradesh<br />

and Rajasthan, India<br />

S.<br />

No.<br />

Trial type State Crops Total trials<br />

conducted<br />

Trials in<br />

which<br />

data<br />

1 Balanced nutrient management<br />

involving secondary and micro<br />

nutrients<br />

2 INM involving secondary and<br />

micro nutrients plus<br />

vermicompost<br />

3 Residual effects of secondary<br />

and micro nutrients<br />

4 Evaluation of boromag<br />

fertilizer<br />

5 Balanced nutrition in rainy<br />

fallows with common<br />

landform management<br />

6 Scaling up the best bet<br />

practices<br />

7 Landform management in<br />

rainy fallows<br />

collected<br />

M.P. Soybean, paddy, groundnut, 429 357<br />

blackgram, maize<br />

Rajasthan Maize, soybean, blackgram, 279 279<br />

pearl millet<br />

M.P. Soybean 103 81<br />

Rajasthan Maize, soybean, groundnut, 72 72<br />

pearl millet, blackgram<br />

M.P. Soybean 35 35<br />

Rajasthan Maize, groundnut, pearl millet, 29 29<br />

blackgram<br />

M.P. Soybean 15 15<br />

Rajasthan Maize, Pearl millet 23 23<br />

M.P. Soybean 124 76<br />

M.P. Soybean 772 625<br />

Rajasthan Maize, soybean, sorghum,<br />

pearl millet, groundnut,<br />

blackgram<br />

579 553<br />

M.P. Soybean 91 72<br />

Farmer participatory evaluation of balanced nutrient management involving secondary and micronutrients:<br />

The emerging widespread deficiencies of S, B and Zn in the rainfed SAT are apparently holding back the realization<br />

of existing productivity potential and resulting inefficient utilization of existing available water resources leading to<br />

low rain water use efficiency (RWUE). Depletion of the resource base is diminishing the capabilities of poor<br />

farmers to earn more and making them vulnerable to drought and other climate related disasters. In order to reverse<br />

the deteriorating state of production systems and increase their resilience, farmer participatory approach was adopted<br />

to evaluate and demonstrate the soil test based balanced nutrition in different parts of Madhya Pradesh and<br />

Rajasthan in India.<br />

The two seventy eight trials conducted with soybean in eight districts in Madhya Pradesh, revealed significant<br />

increase in grain yield by 10 to 40 per cent over farmers practice through adoption of soil test based fertilizer<br />

applications (Table 9).<br />

Similarly, seventy nine trials in Mandla district, Madhya Pradesh increased yields on an average by 41% increase in<br />

paddy, 57% in groundnut, 11% in blackgram and 85% in maize. The mean yields under balanced nutrition were<br />

2910 kg ha -1 in paddy, 1710 kg ha -1 in groundnut, 630 kg ha -1 in blackgram and 12150 kg cob ha -1 in maize.<br />

Suhas P Wani, Girish Chander, KL Sahrawat,<br />

DK Pal, TP Mathur and P Pathak<br />

Table 9. Effect of soil test based application of S, B and Zn on rainfed soybean in Madhya Pradesh, India,<br />

rainy season, <strong>2010</strong><br />

District Grain yield (kg ha -1 ) % Increase<br />

FP<br />

BN<br />

Raisen 1280 1490 16<br />

Sagar 1500 1740 16<br />

Shajapur 1990 2200 11<br />

Indore 1550 1710 10<br />

Guna 1280 1500 17<br />

331


Anandpur 1390 1530 12<br />

Vidisha 1060 1480 40<br />

Jhabua 1460 1660 14<br />

In Rajasthan, 150 trials conducted with maize in Banswara and Bhilwara districts recorded 21-24% increase due to<br />

adoption of soil test based balanced nutrition including deficient S, B and Zn. The average maize grain yield realized<br />

under balanced nutrition was 2450 kg ha -1 in Banswara and 3590 kg ha -1 in Bhilwara district. In other 75 trials<br />

involving balanced nutrition, soybean crop recorded average 1890 kg ha -1 grain yield under balanced nutrition<br />

having a 10% increase in productivity over farmers practice. Similar results were recorded for blackgram, maize,<br />

pearlmillet and groundnut crops in Tonk and Sawai Madhopur districts.<br />

Farmer participatory evaluation of integrated nutrient management involving micronutrients and<br />

vermicompost: Farmer participatory trials were also conducted to evaluate, against the farmers practices and soil<br />

test based balanced nutrition, the inclusion of locally prepared vermicompost on the basis of meeting 50% of N<br />

requirement in cereals and 50% of P requirement in legumes and cutting cost on 50% of chemical fertilizers.<br />

The 30 trials with maize conducted in Bhilwara and Banswara in Rajasthan, recorded 19-23% increase with soil test<br />

based balanced nutrition including deficient S, B and Zn over farmers practice (Table 10). But, inclusion of<br />

vermicompost on the basis of meeting 50% of N requirement further increased grain yield over balanced nutrition<br />

involving sole chemical fertilizers by 2-7%. The INM involving vermicompost prepared from local materials thus<br />

not only results higher yields in contrast to pure chemical fertilizers, but also saved 50% cost on chemical fertilizers.<br />

In other trials with soybean in Jhalawar, the INM involving vermicompost on the basis of meeting 50% P, similarly<br />

recorded 12% higher grain yield over the sole use of chemical fertilizers. Similar results were observed in<br />

groundnut, pearlmillet, blackgram and maize crops in Tonk and Sawai Madhopur districts.<br />

Table 10. Effect of soil test based integrated nutrient management on rainfed soybean in Rajasthan, India,<br />

rainy season <strong>2010</strong><br />

District Crop Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

FP BN 50% BN+VC<br />

Banswara Maize 2850 3390 3620<br />

Bhilwara Maize 4410 5420 5520<br />

Jhalawar Soybean 1700 1810 2020<br />

Similarly, in >80 trials conducted with soybean as test crop in Raisen, Shajapur, Indore, Guna, Anandpur, Vidisha<br />

and Jhabua districts in Madhya Pradesh, the INM practice involving vermicompost, in general proved better in terms<br />

of increasing crop productivity as well as saving 50% cost on chemical fertilizers.<br />

Farmer participatory evaluation of residual effects of secondary and micronutrients: Farmer participatory<br />

trials conducted to evaluate the residual effects of S, B and Zn in Guna, Raisen, Indore, Sehore, Anandpur, Barwani<br />

and vidisha, revealed 6-37% increase in soybean grain yield over farmers practice treatment. Similar results of<br />

residuals benefits were observed with maize, groundnut, pearl millet and blackgram crops in Banswara, Bhilwara,<br />

Bundi, Tonk and Sawai Madhopur districts in Rajasthan state.<br />

Farmer participatory evaluation of slow release B ferlilizer, boromag: The problem with the boron is that due to<br />

its non ionic nature it is leached fairly rapidly from the soil resulting its deficiency. The slow release B fertilizer<br />

which ensures regulated supply of the element may prove best in this context to manage the B nutrition for realizing<br />

best possible productivity. Therefore, boromag a slow release B fertilizer (12% B, 12.5% CaO and 8.9% MgO) was<br />

evaluated in 38 farmers’ fields with soybean, maize and pearl millet in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan states of<br />

India. Boromag was added at the rate of 5 kg ha -1 .<br />

The results of rainy season <strong>2010</strong> trials clearly suggested the benefit in productivity enhancement due to boromag<br />

application. The productivity increased by 5-13% in test crops with inclusion of boromag in fertilization practices in<br />

comparison to control farmers practice (Table 11).<br />

332


Table 11. Effect of boromag application on grain yield of crops in semi arid regions of India, rainy season<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

State<br />

Grain yield (kg ha -1 ) % Increase<br />

District<br />

Crop<br />

Control Boromag<br />

Madhya Pradesh Guna Soybean 1550 1750 13<br />

Rajasthan Bundi Maize 2810 3040 8<br />

Rajasthan Sawai Madhopur Pearl millet 1830 1920 5<br />

Balanced nutrition in rainy fallows with common landform management: In rainy fallow regions, trials were<br />

implemented on BBF landform management to evaluate the effect of balanced nutrition as against farmers practice.<br />

The soil test based balanced nutrition resulted a 3 to 15% increase in grain production over the farmers practice<br />

(Table 12). A similar increase up to 24% was observed in straw biomass. The findings clearly suggested that the<br />

landform management along with balanced nutrition is the key to bring in rainy season fallows under profitable<br />

cropping.<br />

Table 12. Effect of soil test based application of S, B and Zn (With common BBF) on rainfed soybean in rainy<br />

season fallow regions in Madhya Pradesh, India, rainy season, <strong>2010</strong><br />

District Grain yield (kg ha -1 ) % increase<br />

FP<br />

BN<br />

Raisen<br />

1310 1400 7<br />

Sagar<br />

1360 1400 3<br />

Indore<br />

1430 1590 11<br />

Sehore<br />

2410 2760 15<br />

Anandpur 1340 1480 10<br />

Scaling up of best bet practices in SAT regions of central India: The scaling up of the best bet practice (Soil test<br />

based balanced nutrition including deficient S, B and Zn plus improved cultivar) were done with 625 farmers in<br />

Guna, Raisen, Sagar, Shajapur, Indore, Sehore, Anandpur, Vidisha, Barwani and Jhabua districts in Madhya<br />

Pradesh. The best bet recorded 12-31% increase over traditional farmers practice (Table 13).<br />

Table 13. Scaling up of soil test based balanced nutrition in rainfed districts of Madhya Pradesh, India, rainy<br />

season <strong>2010</strong><br />

District Crop No. of trials Grain yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

% increase over<br />

FP<br />

Guna Soybean 62 1320 29<br />

Raisen Soybean 78 1470 29<br />

Sagar Soybean 20 1840 27<br />

Shajapur Soybean 75 2250 29<br />

Indore Soybean 150 1880 12<br />

Sehore Soybean 106 1620 30<br />

Anandpur Soybean 20 1730 20<br />

Vidisha Soybean 36 1560 31<br />

Barwani Soybean 75 2160 29<br />

Jhabua Soybean 3 1740 13<br />

In similar scaling up trials with maize crop in Banswara, Bhilwara, Jhalawar and Bundi districts in Rajasthan, the<br />

best bet recorded 10-33% increase in grain yield over farmers practice (Table 14). In trials with soybean in Bundi<br />

district, the productivity improved by 13% as compared to farmers practice. Similarly scaling up of best bet was<br />

done in Alwar, Tonk, and Sawai Madhopur districts and recorded an increase in crop production varying from 7 to<br />

56% as compared to farmers practice.<br />

333


Table 14. Scaling up of soil test based balanced nutrition in rainfed districts of Rajasthan, India, rainy season<br />

<strong>2010</strong><br />

District Crop No. of trials Grain yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

% increase over<br />

FP<br />

Banswara Maize 116 2980 19<br />

Bhilwara Maize 150 2890 19<br />

Jhalawar Maize 108 1240 10<br />

Bundi Maize 14 4110 33<br />

Soybean 37 1250 13<br />

Alwar Sorghum (Fodder) 62 3780 Not available<br />

Pearl millet 26 1930 Not available<br />

Tonk Groundnut 3 910 19<br />

Maize 12 3260 56<br />

Pearl millet 3 2000 13<br />

Blackgram 2 330 7<br />

S. Madhopur Blackgram 3 670 13<br />

Pearl millet 9 1910 18<br />

Maize 8 2750 41<br />

Farmer participatory evaluation of landform management in rainy fallow regions of central India:<br />

More than 70 farmer participatory trials were conducted in rainy season fallow areas to evaluate the effect of<br />

landform management on soybean productivity. Soil test based balanced nutrition and improved cultivars were<br />

common in both the treatments. The landform management involving broadbed and furrow proved superior over<br />

conservation furrow in terms of 1-33% more productivity (Table 15). The adoption of proper landform management<br />

along with balanced nutrition and improved cultivar thus is the technology to harness good yields from traditional<br />

rainy fallow regions.<br />

Table 15. Effect of landform management (along with balanced nutrition and improved cultivar) on the<br />

soybean yield in rainy fallow regions in Madhya Pradesh, India, rainy season <strong>2010</strong><br />

District<br />

Grain yield<br />

% Increase<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

CF<br />

BBF<br />

Guna 1345 1450 8<br />

Raisen 1270 1360 7<br />

Shajapur 2320 2460 6<br />

Indore 1600 1700 6<br />

Sehore 2710 2730 1<br />

Anandpur 1430 1900 33<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

BAIF, BYPASS, CARD, FES, GVT, DEEP,<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust; Sir Ratan Tata Trust<br />

Output 7.3: Environmental impacts of livestock intensification reduced during droughts and the dry season<br />

by developing and promoting alternative feed and fodder strategies in crop-livestock systems with associated<br />

capacity building<br />

Moved to Project- 9<br />

334


Output 7.4: Opportunities for the market exploitation of biodiesel tree products by the poor promoted with<br />

associated capacity building<br />

Activity 7.4.1. Jatropha curcas as Biofuel<br />

Multi-site screening trials were set up in Samanko (Mali) and Sadore (Niger) with 16 Jatropha accessions to evaluate<br />

their performance in growth and seed yield under two rainfall conditions. A total of 120 Jatropha curcas accessions<br />

originating from Burkina Faso, Mali, Mexico, Malaysia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda were collected and planted at<br />

Sadore (Niger), Samanko, Sikasso and Cinzana (all 3 sites in Mali) in August <strong>2010</strong>. These 4 sites cover a rainfall<br />

gradient ranging from 500 to 1000 mm.<br />

Older experiments planted in 2008 to compare performances of 16 accessions in low rainfall site (500 mm) and<br />

higher rainfall site (800 mm) indicates that there are significant differences between sites in seed yield. Performance<br />

of trees in the Sahelian zone is very poor with an average yield of 2.3 g tree -1 compared to an average yield of 670 g<br />

tree -1 in the Sudanian zone the first year.<br />

The results in the low rainfall (500 mm) and poor soil sandy soil conditions of Sadore indicate significant<br />

differences between accessions in growth traits such as height and collar diameter. One of the two Mexican<br />

accessions showed the highest growth performances (Height and collar diameter) compared with the other<br />

accessions. The log transformation of survival rate did not show any significant difference between the accessions.<br />

Other measured parameters such as number of branches, number of inflorescence and number of infructescence<br />

showed significant differences as well. It is hoped that selection under the low rainfall and poor sandy soil<br />

conditions of Sadore will lead to identification of draught tolerant clones.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mali, Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

University of Copenhagen, ICRAF, the national agricultural research institute of Mali and NGOs<br />

Special project funding:<br />

IFAD<br />

A Nikiema and Dov Pasternak<br />

Activity 7.4.2. Studies on water requirement of Jatropha<br />

AVR Kesava Rao and Suhas P Wani<br />

Jatropha curcas (ICJC-06114) seedlings were planted in November 2004 at a spacing of 3 x 2 m in the BL-3 field of<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru. Daily reference crop evapotranspiration (ET o ) was computed following the FAO Penman-<br />

Monteith method. Evapotranspiration of Jatropha curcas under non-water limiting conditions (ET c Jatropha curcas)<br />

was computed based on ET o and crop coefficients depending on the phonological stage. Soil moisture in the<br />

Jatropha plantation was monitored from November 2005 using the neutron probe (Troxler model 4302) and<br />

gravimetric method. ET actual Jatropha under actual field conditions was estimated from the neutron probe soil<br />

moisture measurements using simplified water balance approach.<br />

Table 16. Evapotranspiration demands of Jatropha curcas at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Patancheru<br />

Element<br />

Year<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Rainfall (mm) 875 712 1102 998<br />

ET o Jatropha (mm) Reference crop evapotranspiration 1624 1631 1659 1760<br />

ET c Jatropha (mm) under non-water limiting conditions 1410 1432 1442 1538<br />

ET actual Jatropha (mm) under actual field conditions 798 614 751 930<br />

ET demand under no moisture stress varied from 1410–1538 mm per year (Table 1) during 2006-2009. Under field<br />

conditions actual ET of Jatropha varied from 614-930 mm depending on the atmospheric evaporative demand,<br />

rainfall and crop phenophase. Patterns of soil water depletion indicated that with growing plant age from two to five<br />

335


years, depth of soil water extraction increased from 100 cm to 150 cm by the fifth year (Fig. 5). Monthly water use<br />

of Jatropha varied from 10-20 mm (leaf shedding period) to 140 mm depending on water availability and<br />

environmental demand. This study indicated that Jatropha curcas has a good drought tolerance mechanism;<br />

however under favourable soil moisture conditions it could use large amounts of water for luxurious growth and<br />

high yield. These findings highlight the need to carefully assess the implications of large Jatropha plantations on<br />

water availability and use under different agroecosystems, particularly so in water scarce regions such as semi-arid<br />

and arid regions in the tropics.<br />

Two-year young plants<br />

Five-year young plants<br />

Figure 5. Distribution of volumetric soil moisture content in Jatropha curcas Distribution of volumetric soil<br />

moisture content in Jatropha curcas<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Activity 7.4.3. Assessing sowing date × genotypes effect on productivity of sweet sorghum during the rabi<br />

season<br />

During Rabi 2009-10, we studied the effect of early sowing on productivity of sweet sorghum. Improved<br />

cultivars (CSH 22 SS, SSV 84 and ICSA5 x SPV 1411) were sown on May 21 and June 10. Early sowing<br />

increased both the stalk and juice yield of sweet sorghum. May sowing had a fresh stalk yield of 53.8 t ha -1 and<br />

juice yield of 21.3 t ha -1 ; whereas June sowing had a fresh stalk yield of 51.2 t ha -1 and juice yield of 18.6 t ha -1 .<br />

CSH 22 SS was the highest yielder. Whereas, juice yield was the highest with ICSA 52 x SPV 1411.<br />

Participating Countries:<br />

India<br />

Participating Partners:<br />

NRCS, IICT and NGOs<br />

Special project funding:<br />

NAIP, GoI, GOJ-JIRCAS, IFAD<br />

Gajanan L Sawargaonkar, SP Wani, Piara Singh and Belum VS Reddy<br />

Activity 7.4.4. Assessing response of sweet sorghum genotypes to nitrogen management<br />

In Kharif <strong>2010</strong>, we studied the response of three improved genoptypes (ICSA 52 X SPV 1411; CSH 22 SS and<br />

ICSV 93046) to N application rated ranging from 0 to 150 kg ha -1 . Cultivar CSH 22 SS (medium duration) was<br />

more responsive in terms of TDM yields (17 to 32 t ha -1 ) and brix (17 to 20%) to increased rate of N application<br />

up to 120 kg ha -1 , whereas, ICSV 93046 (late duration) was poor (5 to 9 t ha -1 TDM and 12 to 14% brix). Onfarm<br />

participatory sweet sorghum yield maximization trials in Ibrahimabad, Andhra Pradesh showed that<br />

improved management practices (improved variety, sowing with tropicultor, BBF system and balanced nutrition<br />

with micronutrients) increased fresh biomass yield to 52 t ha -1 as compared to 25 t ha -1 harvested by farmers with<br />

their management.<br />

Participating Countries:<br />

India<br />

336


Participating Partners:<br />

NRCS, IICT and NGOs<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

GoI, GoJ-JIRCAS, IFAD, NAIP, D1 oil fuel crops<br />

Gajanan L Sawargaonkar, SP Wani, Piara Singh and Belum VS Reddy<br />

337


MTP Project 9:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Poverty alleviation and sustainable management of land, water, livestock and<br />

forest resources through sustainable agro-ecological intensification in low-and<br />

high-potential environments in the semi-arid tropics of Africa and Asia<br />

Peter Craufurd<br />

Milestone: New tools and methods for management of multiple use landscapes with a focus on sustainable<br />

productivity enhancement, developed and promoted with associated capacity-building in collaboration with<br />

NARES partners in Africa and Asia<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India and USA<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.<br />

Special Project Funding: USAID Linkage project<br />

Climate change is expected to adversely impact the productivity and production of rainfed crops like groundnut<br />

in the semi-arid areas of India. Quantification of this impact in different agroclimatic regions of India where<br />

groundnut is grown is needed to develop suitable coping strategies (genetic and management). We used<br />

CROPGRO model for groundnut along with historical weather data and projected changes in climate as per the<br />

A1B SRES scenario for the Indian region. Spatial and temporal impact of climate change on productivity of<br />

groundnut was assessed for the 24 sites. Increase in temperature from 0.9˚C to 2.9 ˚C (2020 to 2080 time scale)<br />

hastened crop maturity at cooler sites and delayed at warmer sites. Increase in CO 2 or rainfall did not affect<br />

progress towards maturity. Across sites, pod yield was more sensitive to the increase in temperature than<br />

biomass yield. Decrease in pod yield with increase in temperature ranged from -4% to -13% by 2020 (+0.9 ˚C),<br />

-6 to -29% by 2050 (+1.9 ˚C) and -9% to -46% by 2080 (+2.9 ˚C). In spite of the beneficial effect of increase in<br />

CO 2 and rainfall, the detrimental effect of temperature increase, even by +0.9 ˚C, on pod yield were still<br />

recorded for some sites. By 2050, pod yields decreased by -1% to -16% with the increase in both temperature<br />

(+1.9 o C) and CO 2 (532 ppm) at warmer and low rainfall sites, while at other sites the pod yields increased up to<br />

18% above the yields simulated with current climate. The net effect of increase in temperature, CO 2 and rainfall<br />

on pod yields at the three time scales was still negative at warmers sites, indicating that the increase in CO 2 and<br />

seasonal rainfall will not completely negate the detrimental impacts of temperature at some sites. Across sites,<br />

the current seasonal mean temperature and effective rainfall were the major determinants of changes in pod<br />

yield for different climate change scenarios. Harvest index (HI) of groundnut decreased with all climate change<br />

scenarios. For sustainable increase in groundnut productivity in future, re-adjustments in the duration of<br />

groundnut to the water availability periods at different sites will be needed. For warmers sites, we will need<br />

high temperature tolerant and drought resistant cultivars for higher productivity and higher HI. For relatively<br />

cooler sites, we will need cultivars with greater partitioning to pods to take advantage of climate change.<br />

Enhancing effectiveness of rainfall through improved soil and crop management would further minimize the<br />

adverse impacts of climate change on groundnut productivity.<br />

Piara Singh, K Srinivas, KJ Boote, SP Wani and AVR Kesava Rao<br />

Milestone: Capacity of national agricultural and regional institutions to understand risks of climate change<br />

understood<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD), University of Nairobi (UoN), Kenya Agricultural Research Institute<br />

(KARI) and Ministry of Agriculture, Gove of Kenya (MoA)<br />

Growing understanding of interactions between the atmosphere, sea and land surfaces, advances in modeling the<br />

global climate system, and increased investment in monitoring the tropical oceans have led to improved<br />

predictability of climate fluctuations months in advance in many parts of the world. Predictability of seasonal<br />

climatic conditions was found to be especially good for East Africa, where the inter-annual climate variability is<br />

strongly associated with El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) conditions. KMD and other regional and global<br />

organizations such as IGAD Climate Prediction and Application Centre (ICPAC) and International Research<br />

Institute for Climate and Society (IRI) regularly develop and disseminate seasonal climate forecasts for both<br />

338


short and long rain seasons in Kenya at least one month before the start of the season. Considering the potential<br />

of these forecasts in reducing risk and capitalise on opportunities created by variable climatic conditions,<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> in collaboration with KMD, UoN, KAR and MoA initiated a study to evaluate the value of forecast<br />

based decisions in reducing risk and improving profitability. This involved interpretation of probabilistic<br />

forecasts issued by KMD and presenting the same in the form of “Weather based agro-advisories” which can<br />

easily be understood by the end users.<br />

The development of advisories is based on inputs provided by KMD and KARI and extension workers of MoA<br />

from the target locations during a meeting convened to discuss the agricultural implications of the forecast. The<br />

final advisory includes consensus recommendations from the group and is structured to provide a brief review of<br />

the performance of previous season forecast, prediction for the current season and agricultural implications of<br />

the current forecast. The advisories were pilot tested for their usefulness at six locations in Ukambani region of<br />

Eastern Kenya viz., Kitui, Mwingi, Mutomo, Mwala, Katumani and Makindu, involving a total of 195 farmers<br />

over a period of six seasons starting from 2007-2008 short rain season. In August/September <strong>2010</strong> a survey was<br />

conducted at three locations, where the advisories were pilot tested, to assess how the recipients of the<br />

advisories used and benefitted by the information provided. In general, farmers found the advisory very useful<br />

and showed keen interest in receiving the same. The survey results indicate that most farmers considered<br />

advisories extremely useful in planning farm operations (Table 1), an observation well supported by the<br />

willingness of 87% of the farmers interviewed to pay for the service if required.<br />

Table 1: Farmer assessment of usefulness of advisories in planning farm operations and their willingness<br />

to pay for the service<br />

Location<br />

Usefulness (%)<br />

Total farmers<br />

Willingness to<br />

(No) Extremely Somewhat Not very<br />

pay<br />

useful useful useful<br />

Kitui 27 59% 33% 0% 81%<br />

Mwingi 39 77% 29% 3% 85%<br />

Mutomo 26 69% 22% 3% 96%<br />

The final component of this activity is to work towards institutionalization of this approach by putting in place a<br />

system to develop and disseminate the advisories regularly. A formal meeting with the senior level managers<br />

from KARI, KMD and Ministry of Agriculture to discuss and chalk out a way forward is scheduled for March<br />

2011. With their support, we are planning to develop an automated system for generating the location advisories<br />

and making them available to end users through local extension agencies.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Risk, Reducing Vulnerability and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity under a Changing Climate”<br />

funded by IDRC/DFID-CCAA program.<br />

“Making the best of climate: Adapting agriculture to climate variability” funded by ASARECA<br />

KPC Rao, Peter Cooper and John Dimes<br />

Milestone: A report on opportunities for adapting agriculture to climate variability and change in ECA<br />

published<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

ASARECA member countries,<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

National agricultural research organizations and meteorological departments, Reading University, ICRAF, ILRI<br />

and CIAT<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The opportunities available for adapting agriculture to climate variability and change in sub-Saharan Africa<br />

were compiled and published as a special edition of the Journal of Experimental Agriculture (Cambridge<br />

University Press) entitled ‘Assessing and addressing climate-induced risk in Sub-Saharan rainfed Agriculture’.<br />

A brief summary of the articles published in this special edition is given below.<br />

339


Supporting agricultural innovation in Uganda to climate risk: linking climate change and variability with<br />

farmer perceptions (Osbahr, H., Dorward, P, Stern, R.D. and Cooper, S.J.): This paper investigates farmers’<br />

perceptions of climate change and variability in south west Uganda where farmers felt that temperature had<br />

increased and seasonality and variability had changed, with the first rainy season between March and May<br />

becoming more variable. From the analyses of the weather data at hand, there is a clear signal that temperature<br />

has been increasing in the climate data and, to a lesser extent. However, rainfall measurements do not show a<br />

downward trend in rainfall amount. The paper reflects on the methodological approach and considers the<br />

implications for communicating information about risk to users in order to support agricultural innovation.<br />

Adding value to field-based agronomic research through climate risk assessment: a case study of maize<br />

production in Kitale, Kenya (Dixit, P.N., Cooper, P.J.M., Rao, K.P.and Dimes, J.): This study demonstrates the<br />

value of tools such as weather generators and crop simulation models by assessing the value of the outputs in the<br />

context of a high potential maize production area in Kenya where grain yields can exceed 10 t ha -1 . MarkSim<br />

generated weather data is shown to provide a satisfactory approximation of recorded weather data, and the<br />

output of 50 years of APSIM simulations demonstrate maize yield responses to plant population, weed control<br />

and N-fertilizer that correspond well with reported results. Weather-induced risk is shown to have important<br />

effects on the rates of return ($ per $ invested) to N-fertilizer which, across seasons and rates of N-application,<br />

ranged from 1.1 to 6.2.<br />

Dealing with climate related risks: some pioneering ideas for enhanced pastoral risk management in Africa<br />

(Ouma, R, Mude, A and van de Steeg, J): This paper makes the case for innovative risk management<br />

approaches in pastoral settings, which may include adjustments to the traditionally practiced approaches that<br />

have become progressively less effective. Recent data from studies in Kenya and southern Ethiopia was used to<br />

confirm that traditional pastoral risk management approaches are increasingly futile against increasing external<br />

pressures, seasonal rainfall variability and future climate change. Some pioneering approaches and ideas, with<br />

potentially wider application to African pastoral settings, appear to offer greater hope; these include (i) indexbased<br />

risk transfer products in pastoral systems, (ii) improvements in the management of food insecurity<br />

response for pastoralists and (iii) recasting of development interventions as risk management.<br />

Assessing the risk of root rots in common beans in east africa using simulated, estimated and observed daily<br />

rainfall (Farrow, A., Musoni, D, Cook, S and Buruchara, R): This paper specifically attempts to improve<br />

disease potential maps of root rots in common beans, based on a combination of inherent susceptibility and the<br />

risk of exposure to critical weather events. The paper also assess the utility of remotely sensed daily rainfall<br />

estimates in near real time for the purposes of updating the risks of these events over large areas and for<br />

providing warnings of potential disease outbreaks.<br />

Climate variability and change: farmers perceptions and understanding of intra-seasonal variability in<br />

rainfall and associated risk in semi-arid Kenya (Rao, K.P.C., Ndegwa, W.G., Kizito, K. and Oyoo, A.): This<br />

study examines farmers’ perceptions of short and long term variability in climate, their ability to discern trends<br />

in climate and how the perceived trends converge with actual weather observations in five districts of Eastern<br />

Province in Kenya where the climate is semi-arid with high intra and inter-annual variability in rainfall. The<br />

main implication of the findings is the need to be aware of and account for climate-induced risk during the<br />

development and promotion of technologies involving significant investments by smallholder farmers and<br />

exercise caution in interpreting farmer’s perceptions about long-term climate variability and change. Such<br />

perceptions need to be understood and overcome through a parallel and more objective analysis of recorded<br />

climatic data from nearby stations before utilizing such farmer-based assessments of climate change as the sole<br />

basis for future research and development action.<br />

Assessing climate risk and climate change using rainfall data: a case study from Zambia (Stern, R.D and<br />

Cooper, P.J.M.): Eighty-nine years of daily rainfall data from a site in Southern Zambia are analysed. The<br />

analyses illustrate approaches to assess the extent of possible trends in rainfall patterns and the calculation of<br />

weather-induced risk associated with the inter- and intra-seasonal variability of the rainfall amounts. Trend<br />

analyses used monthly rainfall totals and the number of rain days in each month. No simple trends were found.<br />

Climate and land use-induced risks to watershed services in the Nyando river basin, Kenya (Gathenya, M.,<br />

Mwangi, H, Coe,R, and Sang, J): Climate change and land use change are two forces influencing the hydrology<br />

of watersheds and their ability to provide ecosystem services such as clean and well regulated stream flow.<br />

Using the physically based distributed watershed models, this study finds that land use change could have<br />

impacts of similar or greater magnitude to the impacts of climate change and land management practices aimed<br />

at enhancing infiltration could offset the impacts of climate change. A 10% increase in rainfall, when<br />

340


accompanied by improved soil management resulted in sediment yields that are in fact lower than today. Thus<br />

improvements in land surface condition that result in higher infiltration are an effective adaptation strategy.<br />

Review of seasonal climate forecasting for agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa (James W. Hansen, Simon J.<br />

Mason, Liqiang Sun, and Arame Tall): This paper reviews the use and value of seasonal climate forecasting for<br />

agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), with a view to understanding and exploiting opportunities to realize<br />

more of its potential benefits. Evidence from a combination of understanding of how climatic uncertainty<br />

impacts agriculture, model-based ex-ante analyses, subjective expressions of demand or value, and the few welldocumented<br />

evaluations of actual use and resulting benefit suggests that seasonal forecast may have<br />

considerable potential to improve agricultural management and rural livelihoods. It concludes with a discussion<br />

of institutional and policy changes that will greatly enhance the benefits of seasonal forecasting to agriculture in<br />

SSA.<br />

Assessing and addressing climate-induced risk in sub-Saharan rainfed agriculture: lessons learned (Coe, R.<br />

and Stern, R.D): A defining characteristic of many tropical agricultural systems is their vulnerability to climate<br />

variability. There is now increased attention paid to climate-agriculture links, now that the world is focused on<br />

climate change. This has shown the need for increased understanding of current and future climate and the links<br />

to agricultural investment decisions, particularly farmers’ decisions. With the justified current interest in climate<br />

and agriculture, all stakeholders including researchers, data providers, policy developers and extension workers<br />

will need to work together to ensure that interventions are based on a correct interpretation of a valid analysis of<br />

relevant data.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Uncertainty: Innovation Systems for Coping with Climate Variability and Change” funded by AfDB<br />

through ASARECA.<br />

Peter Cooper, KPC Rao and John Dimes<br />

Milestone: Impacts of global climate change projections on SAT agriculture evaluated in at least two countries<br />

in ECA<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Sudan<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Kenya Meteorological Department, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya,<br />

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, National Meteorological Agency, Sudan Meteorological Agency-<br />

Sudan, Agricultural Research Corporation-Sudan, Sokoine University of Agriculture-Tanzania, and Tanzania<br />

Meteorology Agency<br />

Crop simulation models like APSIM and DSSAT are extremely useful in conducting what if scenario analyses<br />

that will improve our understanding about the impacts of changes in temperature and rainfall on crop<br />

production. However, such an assessment requires validation of model results for the range of conditions that<br />

the simulations are performed. Experiments were conducted at two locations in Kenya to evaluate the<br />

performance of three maize varieties with differing maturity times. The two sites selected are similar in rainfall<br />

distribution but have different temperature regimes. The sites are Katumani in Machakos district and Kambi Ya<br />

Mawe in Makueni district. During the season in which the experiment was conducted, the average temperature<br />

recorded at Katumani was 20.3 0 C and at Kambi Ya Mawe 25.3 0 C. At both locations the amount of rainfall<br />

received during the season was low. Rainfall during the main growing season October to December was 177<br />

mm at Katumani and 179 mm at Kambi Ya Mawe. All varieties grew faster and reached physiological maturity<br />

stage earlier under warmer condition at Kambi Ya Mawe compared to cooler condition at Katumani (Table 2).<br />

The grain yields are low mainly due to low rainfall received during the season at both locations. These results<br />

were used to validate APSIM and conduct an ex-ante assessment of the impacts of temperature increase up to<br />

3 0 C on performance of maize at these locations.<br />

341


15 DAE 30<br />

Table 2: Performance of maize varieties with differing maturity times at Katumani and Kambi Ya Mawe<br />

Biomass yields<br />

Grain Days to Days to<br />

Variety<br />

DAE 1 anthesis<br />

(kg/ha) anthesis maturity<br />

1<br />

50%<br />

yield 50% physiological<br />

Harvest<br />

Katumani<br />

DH 04 55 414 1328 2087 244 65 97<br />

DK 8031 80 414 1173 2136 217 68 105<br />

H 513 69 404 1353 2381 235 72 109<br />

Kambi Ya Mawe<br />

DH 04 70 561 1586 2449 325 59 89<br />

DK 8031 92 651 1561 2831 441 59 98<br />

H 513 86 645 1876 3273 561 62 101<br />

Figure 1. Distribution of semi-arid areas with projected changes in climate by 2020, 2050 and 2080<br />

We have also tried to map the changes in the extent and distribution of semi-arid areas due to climate change,<br />

our primary target area for risk management, using current and projected climate conditions for 2020, 2050, and<br />

2080 (Figure 2). For the current situation we used data from CRU-TS 3.0 Climate Database. The climate change<br />

scenario is based on HADCM3 output for A2a scenario which is widely considered as the business as usual<br />

scenario. The semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas were delineated using “Aridity Index” which is calculated as<br />

the ratio of average precipitation to reference evapotranspiration. The areas with an aridity index between 0.20<br />

and 0.50 were classified as semi-arid and those with an aridity index between 0.50 and 0.65 as dry sub-humid<br />

(Figure 1). In general, the analysis indicates that there will be an increase in semi-arid area in Kenya, Tanzania<br />

and Ethiopia. In Kenya some of the arid areas are expected to turn semi-arid due to an increase in rainfall. In<br />

case of Tanzania, some of the humid environments in southern Tanzania may become semi-arid or dry subhumid<br />

due to a reduction in rainfall and increase in temperature.<br />

342


Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Risk, Reducing Vulnerability and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity under a Changing Climate”<br />

supported by IDRC/DFID-CCAA program.<br />

KPC Rao, Peter Cooper and John Dimes<br />

Milestone: A synthesis report on “Tools and methodologies to assess climate vulnerabilities and support<br />

informed decision making for improved management of agricultural systems in ECA” published<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Sudan<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Kenya Meteorological Department, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya,<br />

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, National Meteorological Agency, Sudan Meteorological Agency-<br />

Sudan, Agricultural Research Corporation-Sudan, Sokoine University of Agriculture-Tanzania, and Tanzania<br />

Meteorology Agency<br />

The overall aim of this activity is to identify and/or develop a set of user friendly tools that assist in assessing<br />

climate variability and its impacts on agricultural systems and provide hands on training to a core group of<br />

researchers from the countries involved in using the same. Initially, a study was conducted to assess methods<br />

and tools currently used by the team members from the four countries involved in analyzing climate data and in<br />

assessing the impacts of climate on performance of crops and cropping systems. The study has identified four<br />

key areas where improved tools and methods can be of great help. These include:<br />

1. Climate data analysis: Tools to analyze the trends in long term climate data<br />

2. Generating climate data: Models that produce synthetic time series of weather data for a given<br />

location based on the statistical characteristics of observed weather at that location.<br />

3. Systems analysis: Crop models and other tools that help understand the interactions and inter<br />

relationships between climate and agricultural systems<br />

4. Risk and return analysis: Tools to evaluate the benefits and risks associated with various agricultural<br />

investments<br />

After a careful consideration of the data and skill requirement of various available tools, we have identified<br />

INSTAT – A statistical package for climate data analysis, MarkSim – A stochastic weather generator to generate<br />

long-term weather data, and APSIM–A systems simulation model for assessing the productivity and<br />

sustainability of crops and cropping systems under variable climatic conditions as the most appropriate options.<br />

In addition, we have also developed a suit of simple spreadsheet based tools to evaluate risk and return profiles<br />

of various indigenous and improved technologies based on the locally relevant input costs and output prices.<br />

The partner institutions were trained in the use of identified tools and feedback received was used to improve<br />

the tools. A publication summarizing the essential features of these tools with example applications, mainly<br />

focusing on risk management, is under preparation.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Risk, Reducing Vulnerability and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity under a Changing Climate”<br />

funded by IDRC/DFID-CCAA program.<br />

“Making the best of climate: Adapting agriculture to climate variability” funded by ASARECA<br />

KPC Rao<br />

Milestone: An institutional innovation system for managing climate variability and change will be established in<br />

ECA which will greatly enhance the awareness, competency and collaborative ability of key institutions<br />

including NARS, NMS, ASARECA Programs and other key change agents to jointly address climate risk<br />

concerns<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

ASARECA members<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

National Meteorological services in ASARECA<br />

Considering the potential contribution NMS could make to the sort of activities envisaged in climate projects,<br />

efforts were made to link the met institutions with agricultural research institutions. One of the interventions<br />

343


tried is to train the NMS staff to acquire skills to process the historical climatic data in ways that would be of<br />

value for activities concerned with agricultural research and development and enable them to join teams because<br />

of their skills, and process the raw climatic data themselves. They hence add value to their own data, rather than<br />

merely provide it for others. Based on the experiences gained through a set of Proof of Concept projects, a set of<br />

Good Practice guidelines were developed for the management and collaborative analyses of climate information<br />

in consultation with NMS and NARS of ECA. During a meeting in December 2009, involving NMS and<br />

agricultural research staff, the following points were agreed to enhance the links between them:<br />

1. All were agreed of the importance of helping the NMS move into “centre stage” for such agricultural<br />

climate risk research activities. ASARECA was clear that it supported this approach<br />

2. This will mean that any future ASARECA project in which such collaboration is deemed important will<br />

have to prepare the Met Services and the Research Institutes to work in partnership.<br />

3. ASARECA was of the view that it would need to be proactive to foster this collaboration in the future.<br />

Currently its point of contact is only with the National Agricultural Research Institution in each country.<br />

4. Within the current project, Uganda had developed a model that had supported collaboration between its Met<br />

Service and NARO. The group felt that key elements of this model could be adapted for collaboration with<br />

other services. The key elements in Uganda included the following:<br />

• Initial capacity building in decentralised data entry. (In the current support this was largely with<br />

funding in parallel, from the Met Office UK to the Uganda Met Service)<br />

• Availability of computers and software for decentralised data entry and applications. (Also provided<br />

through Met Office UK).<br />

• Capacity-building in applications for selected staff. This was through e-SIAC and f-SIAC, funded<br />

through this project.<br />

• A later initiative had been a within-country e-SIAC, for 30+ staff from the Met Service, some of which<br />

are based at the NARO (i.e. agricultural research) stations. This later initiative was again funded<br />

largely by the Met Office UK.<br />

• Support from the project for (daily) temperature data to be added to the central database.<br />

5. The work in this project (and in a similar project in Malawi) has shown that one key activity for some NMS<br />

is for their (daily) database to be enhanced, so they can contribute to work that uses crop simulation models<br />

and other types of climate risk analyses.<br />

6. There are many existing ASARECA projects where a climate risk/adaptation aspect could usefully be<br />

added. This was the intention for the existing project, but was not possible, partly because of the substantial<br />

re-organisation by ASARECA at the start of this project.<br />

7. The existing project had shown that substantial support might be needed for Met Services to be able to<br />

move to centre stage in agricultural research. It is hoped that this might be possible, perhaps partly through<br />

funding a second phase of the existing project.<br />

8. One advantage that Met Services have over other organisations is that they work well together, i.e. with the<br />

service in neighbouring countries. An example is their regular collaboration in producing the seasonal<br />

climate forecast for ECA. Hence an activity that encourages collaboration between the different Met<br />

Services as well as with the NARS could be useful.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Uncertainty: Innovation Systems for Coping with Climate Variability and Change” funded by AfDB<br />

through ASARECA.<br />

Peter Cooper, KPC Rao and Roger Stern<br />

Milestone: Ex-ante assessment of climate change on SAT agriculture published.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya and Ethiopia<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Kenya Meteorological Department (KMD); Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (KARI); University of<br />

Nairobi (UoN) and Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR)<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

For rainfed farmers in the semiarid tropics as well as researchers, the key challenge is managing risk associated<br />

with low and variable rainfall. There is a widespread belief that high uncertainty and risk associated with the<br />

investments made on productivity enhancing technologies is one of the major constraints limiting the adoption<br />

of such technologies by small holder farmers in Africa. This ex-ante analysis seeks to examine this issue in<br />

detail by analyzing the potential impact of recommended technologies on risk, productivity and profitability of<br />

344


the systems in Kitui, Mutomo an Mwingi districts of Eastern Province in Kenya. This analysis involves the<br />

following specific objectives:<br />

1. Estimate the potential long-term impacts of selected technologies on the productivity and profitability of<br />

smallholder farms in the target areas<br />

2. Assess the potential impacts of identified technologies as a means of increasing profitability and reducing<br />

risk<br />

3. Explore the implications of results from the above analysis especially in farm level decision making<br />

The analysis is focused on four production technologies whose benefits are well demonstrated but adoption by<br />

farmers is very limited. These include soil and water conservation practices that can reduce the impacts of long<br />

dry spells (tied ridges), crops and varieties with different maturity periods and tolerance to moisture stress, soil<br />

fertility management using inorganic fertilizers, and seasonal climate forecast based selection of crops and<br />

management practices. Simulation experiments were set up with treatments that are highly relevant to the target<br />

areas. Since soil fertility management is one of the major constraints in improving yields at target locations, we<br />

have evaluated the profitability and risk on investments in fertilizer with due consideration to fertilizer costs and<br />

probability of crop failure. An example of the risk/return profile generated for fertilizer use for one of the test<br />

locations, Mwingi is presented in table 3.<br />

Table 3: Risk and return profile of fertilizer application at Mwingi<br />

0 Kg/ha 20KgN/ha 40kgN/ha 60 kgN/ha 80 kgN/ha<br />

Average Yield (kg/ha) 1213 2185 2612 2666 2674<br />

Best yield (kg/ha) 2802 3399 3447 3475 3511<br />

Optimistic Yield(kg/ha) 1568 2497 3005 3104 3136<br />

Expected Yield (kg/ha) 1207 2209 2806 2853 2874<br />

Pessimistic Yield (kg/ha) 694 1861 2298 2466 2482<br />

Worst Yield (kg/ha) 0 903 522 472 438<br />

% years with >10 kg grain/kg<br />

N<br />

87% 83% 74% 74%<br />

Value cost ratio >2 73% 61% 52% 42%<br />

The data indicates that investment on fertiliser to apply at recommended rate of 40 Kg N/ha can be recovered in<br />

83% of the years. However, the returns on investment are attractive with a value to cost ration of more than 2 in<br />

only 61% of the years. The risk can be reduced substantially with application of small doses of fertiliser (20 kg<br />

N/ha) which gives attractive returns in 73% of the years. This information is extremely useful while making<br />

investment decisions. The treatments considered for assessing the benefits of soil and water conservation<br />

practices included normal farmer practice, tied ridges and mulching on two different soils. Simulations were<br />

also carried out to assess the interactive benefits of with and without application of 5 different levels of nitrogen.<br />

In case of crops, performance of maize varieties with three different maturity periods were evaluated as sole<br />

crop, intercrop with pigeonpea and in rotation with legume bean crop. The other technology on which ex ante<br />

assessment was carried out is forecast based farming. Benefits and value of forecast based decisions such as<br />

selecting crops/varieties/management practices and allocation of land to various crops and verities were<br />

quantified.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Risk, Reducing Vulnerability and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity under a Changing Climate”<br />

supported by IDRC/DFID-CCAA program.<br />

KPC Rao, Peter Cooper and John Dimes<br />

Milestone: Regional capacities in linking simulation models, participatory on-farm research and climatic<br />

forecasting to increase the competencies of smallholder farmers in coping with current climatic variability and<br />

adapting to potential climatic change strengthened in East and Southern Africa<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Madagascar<br />

345


Partner Institutions:<br />

Kenya Meteorological Department, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture Kenya,<br />

Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, National Meteorological Agency, Sudan Meteorological Agency-<br />

Sudan, Agricultural Research Corporation-Sudan, Sokoine University of Agriculture-Tanzania, and Tanzania<br />

Meteorology Agency, SOMEAH and FOFIFA in Madagascar.<br />

Climate information, including historical and real-time, is vital for the optimal management of agriculture and<br />

natural resources on which agriculture depends. When properly integrated with decision making process,<br />

climate information has the potential to moderate the effects of variable climate on food production and<br />

ecosystem functions. The need for such integration is more important now than ever due to the growing concern<br />

about the climate change and its impacts on agriculture. Though meteorological organizations have collected<br />

and are maintaining huge databases of climatic information, very little effort has gone to turn this data into<br />

useful information for use by research and developmental programs through in depth analysis and interpretation<br />

to study the relationships among weather, climate, and agriculture. To some extent this is constrained by<br />

complex nature of the agricultural systems and lack of appropriate tools to properly quantify the relationships<br />

between climate and agricultural production. However, recent advances in our understanding of the agricultural<br />

systems coupled with those in the computing technology resulted in the development of a number of tools and<br />

methods that are extremely useful in conducting a detailed analysis on the soil-plant-climate systems.<br />

Unfortunately, use of these tools in most developing countries is limited by non-availability of required skills.<br />

Realizing the need for the capacity in making use of these new tools and methods, efforts were made to build a<br />

core team of research and extension experts with required skills in each of the four countries involved. As a first<br />

step, a one week training program targeting the project team members was developed and members were trained<br />

in the use of various tools and methods that are useful in understanding the climate variability and its impacts on<br />

agricultural systems. This was followed by a refresher course to brush up and enhance their skills in the use of<br />

these tools especially in system simulation analysis using APSIM. The team members were also supported in<br />

planning and conducting trials aimed at collecting the required data to calibrate and validate the model. Through<br />

this training and follow up support, team members from the four countries involved have now acquired<br />

sufficient skills to make use of the models and other tools. Some aspects of the training module are now used by<br />

Institute for Meteorological Training and Research (IMTR), a training affiliate KMD, in their training programs.<br />

The Excel based tools are used by all the project partners.<br />

In addition, a training module targeting extension staff was prepared and pilot tested in Kenya. The same will be<br />

improved and made available to IMTR for planning and executing training programs aimed at improving the<br />

understanding of climate issues in agriculture by the personnel involved in agriculture extension.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

“Managing Risk, Reducing Vulnerability and Enhancing Agricultural Productivity under a Changing Climate”<br />

supported by IDRC/DFID-CCAA program.<br />

“Making the best of climate: Adapting agriculture to climate variability” funded by ASARECA<br />

KPC Rao, Peter Cooper and John Dimes<br />

Milestone: Increase yields of major crops by at least 50% and the income of 360 000 household by 30% in<br />

Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger by 2013<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

INERA (Burkina Faso) , IER (Mali), INRAN (Niger) , <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

and TSBF , NGOs, Agro dealers, Farmers, Farmer organizations.<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

The project on backstopping Fertilizer and Inventory Credit System Project in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger<br />

seeks to increase yield through four components:-<br />

• Teaching of farmers about the microdosing technique as developed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and its partners;<br />

• Dissemination of the technology through FFS, demonstrations;<br />

• Use of communication channels such as local radios;<br />

• Creation of village level Input Stores and Warrantage Stores and schemes managed by farmers<br />

346


After 18 months of implementation, the project has the following achievements:<br />

• Launching and one planning meetings organized in Ouagadougou and in Niger;<br />

• Three training workshops organized by the regional coordination on data analysis, management of the<br />

project and technical report writing;<br />

• One training on result based monitoring and Evaluation organized by AGRA and attended by country<br />

teams and the regional coordination;<br />

• Two trainings on P seed coating for scientists and students from Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger;<br />

• Training on warrantage for NGO staff, farmer organizations in the three countries, but also for an<br />

AGRA project in Nigeria on request;<br />

• Baseline studies done in the three countries, and reports submitted to AGRA<br />

• Backstopping by the RIO of <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to draft communication plans for the project in Burkina Faso,<br />

Mali, and Niger<br />

Table 4: Main countries achievements on some project components in <strong>2010</strong><br />

Country Input stores Warrantage<br />

stores<br />

No.<br />

microdosing<br />

No. FFS<br />

demos<br />

Burkino Faso 28 26 5154 89 36<br />

Mali 39 29 1876 49 100<br />

Niger 24 18 730 60 32<br />

No. input<br />

stores<br />

For the crop yield increase objective, crop yields were increased on average from 823 kg in control (no<br />

fertilizer) to 1656 kg/ha in microdosing plots in Mali on improved sorghum varieties in 400-600 mm rainfall<br />

range. The same trend is observed on local varieties in the same rainfall range. Similar yield increase was in<br />

higher rainfall range (600-800 mm) and 800-1200 mm range in Mali. In Burkina Faso, on improved sorghum<br />

varieties, yields were 675 kg/ha on control plots and 1879 kg/ha on microdosing plots. In Niger, average grain<br />

yields varied from 1300 to 1400 kg/ha in microdosing plots as compared to 500 kg/ha in control plots. On<br />

groundnuts, average control yields were 540 kg/ah as compared to microdosing with SSP and compound<br />

fertilizer (15-15-15) with respectively average yields of 1275 kg/ha and 1552 kg/ha. In Burkina Faso, about<br />

4800 framers have conducted microdosing demonstrations on 1300 ha of land on millet sorghum, cowpea, and<br />

maize. Linkages between farmer organizations or agrodealers with financial institutions in Burkina Faso, Mali<br />

and Niger has lead to 25 million CFA allocated by BRS to AGRODIA for fertilizer purchases, agreements<br />

drafted in Niger with ECOBANK and BRS, and in Mali 25 million CFA was loaned to farmers generating a<br />

benefice of about 9 million CFA. In total , in Mali 488 tons of grain was warranted in <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Conclusions:<br />

The second year of the project implementation has increased the number of activities and project outputs as<br />

compared to year 1. Achievements were well evaluated by the two external evaluators in February 2011, and a<br />

more ambitious work plan is to be prepared for the last year of the project. This plan will include a strong<br />

communication program in each country and an M&E activity with a technology dissemination study before the<br />

start of the 2011 cropping season in all three countries with backstopping from <strong>ICRISAT</strong>.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Achieving Pro-Poor Green Revolution in Drylands of Africa: Linking Fertilizer Microdosing with Input-Output<br />

Markets to Boost Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihoods in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger<br />

Mahamadou Gandah, Regional Coordinator<br />

Milestone: Comparative evaluation of ICP-AES and turbidimetric methods for determining extractable sulfur in<br />

soils<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

None<br />

The deficiency of sulfur (S) as a constraint to crop productivity in irrigated, intensified systems has long been<br />

recognized. A recent survey of farmers’ fields in the Indian semi-arid tropics (SAT) demonstrated that the<br />

deficiency of S, as a constraint to crop production and productivity, is also equally widespread in the rainfed<br />

production systems. The results of this research further showed that soil testing was effective in diagnosing S<br />

347


deficiency; and the crops grown on farmers’ fields with calcium chloride extractable-S < 8-10 mg kg -1 soil<br />

responded positively to the application of sulfur. At the Charles Renard Analytical Laboratory in <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, we<br />

routinely determine available or extractable S in soil samples by ICP-AES (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic<br />

Emission Spectroscopy). However, because of cost consideration in procuring an ICP-AES and also the cost<br />

involved in the conduct of analysis, the turbidimetric method of S determination in soil, water and plant samples<br />

is still widely used in laboratories especially in the developing countries including India. There is no information<br />

on the comparative evaluation of the turbidimetric method with ICP-AES for determining extractable S in soil<br />

samples. The objective of this research therefore, was to compare the values of extractable (available) S<br />

measured by ICP-AES and turbidimetric methods using diverse soil samples. To compare the efficacy of the<br />

turbidimetric method with that of ICP-AES method, 80 diverse surface (0-15 cm layer) soil samples were used;<br />

they had a wide range wide range in pH (5.0 to 8.3) and extractable S. To measure extractable (available) S, the<br />

soil samples were extracted with 0.15% calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ). The extracts were analyzed for extractable S<br />

using ICP-AES and turbidimetric methods. All the soil samples were analyzed in triplicate and the mean values<br />

of three replications are reported. Regression analysis was carried out to establish relationship between the<br />

values of extractable S obtained by ICP-AES (ICP-S) and turbidimetric (Turbid-S) methods for all the 80<br />

samples, and also for soil samples grouped according to pH in the acidic, neutral and alkaline range.<br />

The results of analysis of 80 soil samples for S extracted by 0.15% calcium chloride solution (sulfate-S) and<br />

determined by the ICP-AES (ICP-S) and turbidimetric (Turbid-S) methods showed that the ICP-S values varied<br />

from 1.2 to 32.6 mg kg -1 of soil, while the Turbid-S values ranged from 4.2 to 32.5 mg kg -1 soil. In general, the<br />

Turbid-S values were greater than the ICP-S values in soil samples with different pH (5.0-5.9, 6.0-6.9, 7.0-7.9<br />

and >8.0) groups. The regression analysis between the ICP-S and Turbid-S values for all the 80 samples (Figure 1)<br />

showed that there was a significant (R 2 = 0.621 p< 0.01, n = 80) relationship between the values of extractable S<br />

by the two methods. However, the scatter of the points (Figure 2) with various pH groups of soils clearly<br />

showed that soil samples with pH > 8.0 were the outliers. The correlations between ICP-S and Turbid-S for soil<br />

samples with pH ranging from 5.0-5.9, 6.0-6.9 and 7.0-7.9 pH groups were highly significant (p< 0.01).<br />

However, the correlation between ICP-S and Turbid-S was not significant (R 2 = 0.120, NS, n = 20) for a group<br />

of 20 soil samples with pH > 8. The regression analysis of ICP-S on Turbid-S for all the 80 samples showed<br />

that the correlation (R 2 = 0.621 p< 0.01, n =80) was significant. The correlation coefficient (R 2 ) between ICP-S<br />

and Turbid-S improved from 0.62 to 0.92 (n = 60) when the soil samples with pH > 8.0 were excluded in the<br />

regression analysis. For the 20 soil samples with pH > 8.0, the mean value of extractable S by the turbidimetric<br />

method (13.5 mg kg -1 soil) was over three times greater than that obtained by the ICP-AES method. The<br />

regression equations between the two methods for different groups of soil samples were as follows:<br />

Samples with pH 5.0-5.9, ICP-S = 0.986 Turbid-S – 4.226 (R 2 = 0.922, p


101%. The recovery of the added sulfate was near complete when added in the range of 5-10 mg L -1 . The<br />

precision (evaluated by testing the repeatability of the analysis in lower and higher range of sulfate-S) showed<br />

that the two methods were comparable and equally precise as measured by mean, SE and CV for soil samples<br />

with extractable sulfate in the higher range, but in the case of soil sample with extractable S in the lower range,<br />

the turbidimetric method was less precise than the ICP-AES method (results not presented). However, in general<br />

both methods were less precise in the lower than in the higher extractable S range (Table 1). These results show<br />

that the best results are obtained especially by the turbidimetric method when the extractable S values in the<br />

extract are not in the lower range. In such situations, perhaps higher amounts of soil can used to bring the<br />

concentration of sulfate-S in the extract in the optimum range. Even the ICP-AES method gave a lower<br />

precision for extractable S in the lower than in the higher concentration range (Table 1). This observation is<br />

important as a number of soils in the semi-arid tropical regions of India are low to very low in the extractable or<br />

available S.<br />

Importantly, we observed interference in the determination of sulfate-S by the turbidimetric method in<br />

calcareous soils and this needs further investigation. Probably, during the estimation of sulfate-S in the extracts<br />

by the turbidimetric method in soil samples with pH > 8 results in the formation of barium sulfate and barium<br />

carbonate, resulting in the over estimation of extractable (available) sulfate by the turbidimetric method. In<br />

conclusion, this study on the comparative evaluation of ICP-AES and turbidimetric methods for extractable-S<br />

(sulfate) determination showed that the results obtained by the two methods were in close agreement for soil<br />

samples with pH varying from 5.0 to 7.9. However, the correlation between the values obtained by the two<br />

methods was not significant for soil samples with pH 8.0 or higher. And the ICP-S and Turbid-S were<br />

comparable in precision for soil samples relatively high in extractable S, but ICP-AES method gave a better<br />

precision than that obtained by the turbidimetric method for soil samples very low in extractable S.<br />

KL Sahrawat, SP Wani and K Shirisha<br />

Milestone: Increasing agricultural productivity and sustaining natural resources in SAT Alfisols (RW2<br />

watershed)<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad, India<br />

Alfisols are important soils throughout much of the semi-arid tropics. They are the most abundant soils in the<br />

SAT covering 33 % of the SAT region. Sustaining agricultural productivity and conserving natural resources is<br />

still a major challenge on SAT Alfisols. Our present knowledge does not provide a clear and tested approach<br />

particularly on land- and soil-management techniques that are effective in reducing runoff and erosion,<br />

improving structural stability to the soil, improving water-storage characteristics, and reducing sealing and<br />

crusting. The on-station Alfisols watershed was initiated in 2002 to answer few of these problems on Alfisols.<br />

During 2009-10, the Alfisol watershed had the treatments, which included two crops and cropping systems (Sorghum (PVK 801) / pigeonpea<br />

(ICPL 87119) intercrop and castor (GCH4) as sole crop) and two management practices.<br />

During 2009, the seasonal rainfall was 760 (Jun-Oct) and total annual rainfall was 824 mm. The rainfall was<br />

highly erratic and all the suffered heavily due to extended drought, starting from 2 nd week of July to 3 rd week of<br />

August during the season. The tensiometer data shows that the soil moisture at 67.5 cm and 82.5 cm depths were<br />

similar in both management options with good moisture availability only from 25 th August to 1 st week of<br />

December 2009 (Figure 3).<br />

Matric potential at two depths in RW2 watershed, 2009<br />

120<br />

Matric potential (cm)<br />

0.0<br />

18-Dec 6-Feb 28-Mar 17-May 6-Jul 25-Aug 14-Oct 3-Dec 22-Jan<br />

-150.0<br />

-300.0<br />

-450.0<br />

-600.0<br />

-750.0<br />

67.5 cm Depth 82.5 cm Depth<br />

Rainfall (mm)<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

18-Dec 6-Feb 28-Mar 17-May 6-Jul 25-Aug 14-Oct 3-Dec 22-Jan<br />

Date<br />

Figure 3. Matric potential and daily rainfall in RW2 watershed, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Center 2009<br />

349


Crops were sown on 19 June 2009 and yields of all crops were higher in the BBF system compared to flat system (Fig. 4). The sorghum grain yield<br />

was higher by about 18% and the fodder yield by 7%, pigeonpea grain yield by 32% and dry matter by 28%, while castor grain yield was higher by<br />

6% and dry matter by 41% in BBF system over flat system.<br />

9.0<br />

7.5<br />

7.84<br />

7.31<br />

6.0<br />

5.15<br />

Yield (t ha -1 )<br />

4.5<br />

3.0<br />

4.81<br />

3.42<br />

4.02<br />

1.73<br />

1.5<br />

1.28<br />

1.21<br />

1.6 8<br />

1.42<br />

1.2 4<br />

0.0<br />

Castor Sorghum Pigeonpea Castor Sorghum/ Pigeonpea<br />

Grain<br />

Dry matter<br />

BBF system<br />

Flat cultivation<br />

Figure 4. Crop yield under two land managements at RW2 watershed, 2009-10<br />

Both the annual runoff and soil loss in the BBF system were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) lower by 32% compared to flat system. Peak<br />

runoff rate and soil loss were also significantly lower in BBF land management system (Table 4).<br />

Table 4. Annual rainfall, runoff and soil loss from different treatments at RW2 watersheds, 2009<br />

Parameters BBF system Flat cultivation<br />

Seasonal Rainfall (mm) 760 760<br />

Seasonal runoff (mm) 115 151<br />

Peak runoff rate (m 3 /s/ ha -1 ) 0.122 0.157<br />

Runoff as % of rainfall 15 20<br />

Soil loss (t ha -1 ) 5.30 6.97<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Sir Dorabji Tata Trust, Sir Ratan Tata Trust<br />

P Pathak, SP Wani, Piara Singh and R Sudi<br />

Milestone: Model watersheds for sustaining agricultural productivity and improved livelihoods in the different<br />

agro-ecoregions of India<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

NGOs (PEDO, BAIF, JalaSRI, READS, BIRDS, DA, TVS-ASRI, SHRISTI), Government Departments<br />

(District Water Management Agency, Dept. of Agriculture, Dept. of District Watershed Development),<br />

Universities / ICAR Institutions (National Research Center on Agroforestry; University of Agricultural<br />

Sciences, Dharwad; and ICAR KVKs)<br />

The Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India has sponsored a project on the establishment of model<br />

watersheds for sustaining agricultural productivity and improving livelihoods in the different agro-ecoregions of<br />

India. The Comprehensive Assessment of Watershed Programs in India indicated that the concept of “one size<br />

fits all” approach did not work well in most rainfed regions. For different agro-eco-regions different approach<br />

and practices are needed for higher impact. Strong need was felt to establish model watersheds with following<br />

main objectives.<br />

• To establish Model Sites of Learning in different agro eco zones for demonstrating the potential of<br />

rainfed areas for increasing productivity;<br />

• To improve rural livelihood through participatory watershed development program with consortium<br />

approach through application of new science tools and cost-effective integrated genetic and natural<br />

resource management practices appropriate to socio-economic conditions of farmers and natural<br />

resources of the ecosystems;<br />

• To build capacity of different stakeholders in the areas of integrated watershed management.<br />

350


Based on few key criterias (viz. representativeness in terms of soils, landscape, rainfall, crops and socioeconomic;<br />

major area under rainfed; strong need for watershed program; cooperative community and others)<br />

appropriate sites of the model watersheds in three different agro-eco-regions were selected (Table 5). Overall<br />

good progresses have been made at all the nine model watersheds. Emphasis have been given on testing/<br />

implementing appropriate technologies, productivity enhancement and income generating activities,<br />

convergence, quality capacity building of various stakeholders and monitoring and evaluation. During last two<br />

years fallowing activities have been completed or taken up at nine model watersheds:<br />

• Baseline data collection on biophysical and socio-economic aspects and its analysis<br />

• Topographic and geo-reference maps<br />

• Formation of community groups in watersheds (watershed committee, self-help groups and area groups)<br />

• Knowledge based entry point activity<br />

• Detailed project reports prepared for all the nine watersheds<br />

• Watershed development activities viz. construction of check dams, gully plugs, tanks and other have<br />

been taken up<br />

• Participatory productivity enhancement trials<br />

• Income generating activities<br />

• Installation and collection of data from weather and hydrological monitoring units<br />

• Groundwater level monitoring<br />

• Capacity building activities for various stakeholders<br />

Table 5. Model watershed sites in different ecoregions of India<br />

Annual rainfall<br />

(mm)<br />

Watershed location<br />

(Village, Block/Mandal/<br />

Soil Type<br />

≤700<br />

Taluk, District, State)<br />

Saram,<br />

Biscuwada Block,<br />

Dungarpur Dist.,<br />

Rajasthan<br />

Mota Vadala, Kalavad<br />

Taluk Jamnagar Dist.,<br />

Gujarat<br />

Pathri<br />

Jalgaon Tq & Dist.,<br />

Maharashtra<br />

>700 ≤1000 Nagulapally Sadasivapet<br />

Mandal,<br />

Medak Dist.,<br />

Andhra Pradesh<br />

Alfisols & Associated<br />

soils<br />

Vertisols, Vertic<br />

Inceptisols &<br />

Associated soils<br />

Vertisols, Vertic<br />

Inceptisols &<br />

Associated soils<br />

Vertisols, Vertic<br />

Inceptisols &<br />

Associated soils<br />

Collaborating Institutions/<br />

Organisations<br />

PEDO (NGO); DWMA (State<br />

Govt.)<br />

BAIF (NGO);<br />

DWMA (State Govt.)<br />

JalaSRI Program-<br />

MJ College, Jalgaon,<br />

(NGO);<br />

Dept. Agri. (State Govt.)<br />

READS (NGO);<br />

DWMA (State Govt.)<br />

Neeralakatti,<br />

Dharwad Tq & Dist.,<br />

Karnataka<br />

Damagar,<br />

Babina Block<br />

Jhansi Dist.,<br />

Uttar Pradesh<br />

Melkarai,<br />

Kalakad Taluk Tirunelveli<br />

Dist., Tamil Nadu<br />

>1000 Barkheda Khurd,<br />

Chachoda Block Guna<br />

Dist.,<br />

Madhya Pradesh<br />

Nuagaon,<br />

Kuntha block<br />

Mayurbhanj Dist., Orissa<br />

Vertisols, Vertic<br />

Inceptisols, Alfisols &<br />

Associated soils<br />

Alfisols & Associated<br />

soils<br />

Alfisols & Associated<br />

soils (sandy soils)<br />

Vertisols & Associated<br />

soils<br />

Alfisols & Associated<br />

soils<br />

BIRDS (NGO);<br />

DWDO (State Govt.)<br />

National Research Center on<br />

Agroforestry (NRCAF);<br />

Development Alternative (NGO)<br />

TVS-ASRI (PIA)<br />

BAIF (NGO);<br />

DWMA (State Govt.)<br />

SHRISTI (NGO);<br />

KVK, OUAT Bhubneswar<br />

351


Special Project Funding:<br />

Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India<br />

P Pathak, SP Wani, RC Sachan and R Sudi<br />

Milestone: Farmers participatory IDM (as a major component of ICM) for the identification and inclusion of<br />

legumes in the rice and or wheat cropping systems evaluated and promoted.<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya (JNKV), Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh; Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwa<br />

Vidyalaya (IGKVV), Raipur, Chhattisgarh<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

Evaluation and Promotion of ICM (PVS, IDM, IPM, and INM) technologies for the management of legumes<br />

diseases in chickpea rainfed rice fallow lands of Chattisgarh (CG) and Madhya Pradesh (MP): Three farmers’<br />

participatory activities: 1) Farmers Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS), 2) Improved Pulse Production and<br />

Protection technology (IPPPT) demonstrations, and 3) Village Level Seed System (VLSS) demonstrations were<br />

conducted in the target districts of Madhya Pradesh (Jabalpur, Rewa, Satna and Damoh) and Chhattisgarh<br />

(Raipur, Durg, Rajnandgaon, Kabirdham). Site specific components of IPPPT such as seeds of improved<br />

chickpea cultivars, seed treatment with fungicides (Thiram, Bavistin) and Rhizobium, fertilizer application, line<br />

sowing using locally available seed-cum-fertilizer drill and or locally adopted methods for chickpea were used<br />

in establishing the trials.<br />

PVS: Eight chickpea varieties (JG 14, JG 11, ICCC 37, JGK 2, JG 322, Vaibhav, JG 74 and Vijay) evaluated in<br />

PVS trials in 6 farmers fields in RRFL without supplementary irrigation in CG. Total grain yield ~ 1.0 t ha -1 was<br />

recorded. In MP, the eight chickpea varieties (JG 11, JG 16, JG 14, JG 74, JG 130, JAKI 9218, JG 63, and JGK<br />

2) were tested in 5 PVS trials with supplementary irrigation. Grain yields ranged 0.83 to 3 t ha -1 recorded from<br />

both the states. The chickpea variety JG 16 was the highest yielder (1.93 t ha -1 ) across locations in MP.<br />

IPPPT: A total of 1142, IPPPT– on farm demonstration were successfully conducted and harvested in CG<br />

(421) and MP (721) for seed yield and individual household seed systems. Mean yield of chickpea cultivar<br />

Vaibhav was 0.81 t ha -1 in CG. Among the four improved varieties evaluated in IPPPT in MP; JG 16 gave grain<br />

yield of 2.37 t ha -1 . The mean grain yield across chickpea varieties and locations was ≥ 1.5 t ha -1 .<br />

VLSS: A total of 43 VLSS seed multiplication trials were conducted and harvested [CG (34) and MP (9)] about<br />

30 tons seeds of farmers preferred varieties [JG 16 (10.0 t), JG 130 (9.0 t) and Vaibhav (15.6 t)] was produced.<br />

In addition to seed stored from VLSS, 27.3 tons of seed of Vaibhav was stored by farmers in CG from IPPPT<br />

demonstrations. In comparison to CG, farmers stored a total of 83.60 tons seeds of four improved varieties<br />

[JG16 (40.3 t), JG 74 (13.6t) JG 130 (27.58t) and JAKI 9218 (2.03t)] in MP. Approximately 101.4 tons seeds of<br />

improved varieties of chickpea were produced in the pilot districts.<br />

Imparted training (including preparation of training and extension manuals/lectures etc.) to students, research<br />

scholars, technicians and farmers on the ICM/IDM/IPM of the <strong>ICRISAT</strong> mandated crops specifically on<br />

legumes (chickpea and pigeonpea) and their diseases. IPPPT orientation training (including INM, IPM, IDM<br />

and storage pest and production technology) was imparted to 2455 farmers (CG = 1155 from 48 villages,<br />

MP=1300 from 36 villages) in the target villages during 2009- <strong>2010</strong> crop season on major production<br />

constraints and their management practices.<br />

IPPPT package was highly profitable and cost effective. Percent gain by using IPPPT was up to 400% in CG<br />

and 104% in MP than local farmer practices.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

National Food Security Mission (NFSM) – Pulses, Ministry of Agriculture and cooperatives, GOI, New Delhi,<br />

India.<br />

Suresh Pande<br />

Milestone: Dual (staple food-high value crop) pest resilient cropping systems<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Niger, Burkina Faso<br />

352


Partner Institutions:<br />

Inran, Niger; University Abdou Moumouni, CIRAD-Montpellier, CIRAD-Réunion<br />

Progress/Results:<br />

• major training and capacity building and networking efforts were conducted during this period<br />

• despite major inconvenience caused by deterioration of the security context in Niger, promising results<br />

were obtained on the management of the tomato fruitworm (TFW) Helicoverpa armigera on okra using<br />

a pigeon-pea field border<br />

• however, mixed results were obtained Re: modelling TFW egg-laying preference on pigeon pea vs okra<br />

and sweet corn vs tomato, in view of optimizing trap cropping design (for application to BDL or AMG<br />

systems)<br />

• promising results were obtained in view of the management of both jujube and watermelon fruit flies<br />

within the DEF system (and to a lesser extent BDL)<br />

• major progress was made in the understanding of the taxonomy and bioecology of the Moringa leafworm,<br />

in view of its management in AMG and BDL systems<br />

• major discoveries were made on SHB ecology and management prospects, consistent results (although “negative” in terms of<br />

management prospects) were again obtained on MSB, as reported under Project 3;<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

HOPE Project (BMGF), CIRAD (mainly under the Omega3 project)<br />

Alain Ratnadass<br />

Milestone: Eco-friendly pest management options integrated for sustainable use of natural resources<br />

Country Involved:<br />

India<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

State Government Departments of Agriculture<br />

IPM is the key component in enhancing the productivity of watershed with environmental safety.<br />

Strengthening capacity of farmers and researchers in eco-friendly pest management approaches in<br />

watersheds is considered as important component of integrated watershed management.<br />

To address the above activity IPM team developed and shared various extension hand outs, video films to the<br />

partners during field visits as well as their visits to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> campus.<br />

• During this year 548 farmers (Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Jharkhand),<br />

and 82 researchers representing 12 states in India had an opportunity to interact with IPM team during<br />

their visits to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> with special reference to pesticide residue management. The importance of<br />

protective clothing was shred with the participants and were supplied with sample kits.<br />

• Under the activity of “Bhuchetana” project in Karnataka IPM team involved in the capacity building of<br />

200 NARS researchers from Gulbarga and Davangere districts.<br />

Response from the participants was quite appreciative by adopting the concept of IPM.<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Bhoochetna, IFAD-EC<br />

G V Ranga Rao<br />

Milestone: Verify the impact of contour ridge tillage on biomass production with very high resolution satellite<br />

imagery<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mali, Ghana, Niger, Burkina Faso<br />

353


Partner Institutions:<br />

IER Mali<br />

Contour ridge tillage (CRT) has shown to raise both the stability and the productivity of Sudanian and Sudano-<br />

Guinean smallholder cropping systems, and to restore their resiliency to agricultural soils that have been<br />

exploited for centuries. However, few experimental datasets are published that demonstrate CRT effects onfarm,<br />

and few simulations document CRT’s actual value for climate risk management. Also lacking are<br />

performance specifications by slope and soil type, as well as “objective” verification indicators for CRT<br />

adoption, good practice, and impacts on rainfed crops.<br />

This study extracted NDVI metrics from multi-year QuickBird imagery (2 images in early season, 2 images in<br />

late season) for 38 field pairs (contiguous fields, in same catena position; see excerpt in fig. 6). Overall,<br />

significant differences were captured in NDVI between CRT and non-CRT in 82% of field pairs, of which 72%<br />

correspond to CRT-mediated increases in NDVI. This means that, even in poorly documented on-farm<br />

conditions where high uncertainty subsists about field-scale management practices (only crop type was known<br />

here), satellites can still consistently capture, across a season, positive effects from CRT in 60% of smallholder<br />

field pairs.<br />

When considering only early season imagery, the positive benefits from CRT are visible in 77% of smallholder<br />

field pairs, where higher NDVI values results are associated with increased canopy closure. Satellites can<br />

therefore corroborate the early-season benefits from CRT, as a consequence of either increased plant available<br />

water, earlier planting, or a combination of the two. Imagery further shows that CRT increases canopy<br />

heterogeneity in the season, which can be interpreted as a differential nutrient uptake with early rains, in a<br />

context of heterogeneous residual fertility patterns.<br />

Propagation of benefits from CRT late in the season is masked by NDVI saturation in dense canopies. NDVI is<br />

known to be a better estimator of canopy closure (fraction of vegetation against bare soil) than total biomass<br />

production.<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

Figure 6. Resolution by QuickBird of CRT and non-CRT fields in a typical smallholder setting.<br />

Sukumba, Mali. Excerpt from scene no. 50753 acquired Aug. 3, 2003. a. Panchromatic (CRT: green<br />

outline; non-CRT: red outline). b. Multispectral (R4G3B2 false color composite). Brighter reds<br />

correspond to strong photosynthetic activity.b<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

SIBWA (BMGF-Funded)<br />

Pierre Sibiry Traore<br />

Milestone: model grain and biomass gains from contour ridge tillage in a photoperiod sensitive cereal<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

Mali, Ghana, Niger, Burkina Faso<br />

Partner Institutions:<br />

IER, Mali<br />

Contour ridge tillage (CRT) has a particular potential for highly photoperiod (PP) sensitive germplasm, as it<br />

helps increase productivity through an extended crop cycle. Using original on-farm trial data from 1998-99, this<br />

354


study reported CRT-mediated yield (biomass) increases in the range +4 to +56% (+16 to +62%) for cotton,<br />

maize and millet/sorghum, averaged across a set of 6 fertilization levels (figure 7). While results may appear<br />

relatively inconsistent, they are deemed representative of average smallholder conditions: in the experiment all<br />

crop management beside fertilizer application (choice of species, cultivar, field preparation and maintenance)<br />

was as per usual farmer practice in these mixed cotton-cereal systems. Reduction in yield variability of maize is<br />

noteworthy for no-fertilizer application, suggesting CRT is a smallholder friendly technology. It should also be<br />

noted that expected effect of CRT is greater during drier years, while 1998 (1999) were normal (wet) years.<br />

A CERES-Millet version adapted for obligate PP response was calibrated for phenology of local (12.66°N)<br />

SaniobaB millet cultivar (PP sensitive: DOY 259±4 50% flowering for plantings on DOY 135; 166; 196; 227).<br />

Growth was calibrated using 1998 on-farm observations for the no fertilizer and +CaS fertilizer treatments in<br />

both CRT and non-CRT fields. Integration over the observed [1972-2001] climate from nearby Ségou (100 km<br />

east, synoptic station) was used to predict the effect of CRT / non-CRT, 2 fertilization levels and 2 planting<br />

dates on millet grain yield and biomass.<br />

Results (figure 8) suggest that, for millet cultivar SaniobaB: i) fertilizer application can increase (a1) biomass<br />

production by ~50% irrespective of climate, and can increase (a2) yields by up to 50% (for the 20% wettest<br />

years) as a monotonic function of moisture availability; ii) a +15 days planting delay will decrease (b1) biomass<br />

production by ~15% irrespective of climate, and (b2) yield by up to ~50% for dry to average (6 th decile) years;<br />

iii) CRT has more effect on biomass production during drier years in general, especially for (b1) fertilized fields<br />

and (b2) early planting dates; iv) CRT has more effect on yields when (b1) fertilizer is applied, somewhat more<br />

when (b2) planting is early and appears to bring important gains for the 30% driest years; v/ the approximation<br />

of CRT through combinations of slope and SCS curve number may not be realistic enough, and; vi/ staggered<br />

plantings occur typically up to 30 days, which is likely in increase planting date effects observed here.<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Frequences<br />

CRT_Fert<br />

Yield (Kg/ha)<br />

Figure 7 Effects of contour ridge tillage (CRT)<br />

on millet yields on-farm. Check: no inputs. Fv:<br />

recommended NPK (S) application. PNT: Fv +<br />

natural phosphate. CaS: Fv + plaster. KCl: Fv +<br />

Kcl. Mix: Fv + mix of PNT, plaster<br />

Special Project funding:<br />

CODEWA (BMZ funded)<br />

Figure 8. Simulated effect of contour ridge tillage<br />

on millet yield cv SaniobaB in smallholder<br />

fields.1972-2001 climate, Ségou, Mali<br />

Pierre Sibiry Traore<br />

355


MTP Project 10:<br />

Project Coordinator:<br />

Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics in SAT Asia and WCA<br />

V Balaji (until 31 st August <strong>2010</strong>); Rex Navarro (from 1 st September)<br />

Summary:<br />

During the year, work commenced on digital content management was expanded to cover new topics, and was<br />

further diversified to support repositories of learning materials. A finalized set of techniques for micro-level<br />

drought vulnerability forecasting have been developed after elaborate tests. In a partnership, we carried out<br />

comprehensive testing of the uses of mobile telephony to deliver crop-related advisory and added a new layer of<br />

services to the Agropedia portal to create and deliver group-specific advisory to farmers. With partner’s support<br />

and advice, we finalized a set of tags to describe documents in agricultural research and extension and further<br />

supported the development of the AgroTagger, an online system to “read” and tag agricultural research<br />

documents, making it globally unique in the sector of agriculture as a whole.<br />

Output 10.1: ICT-mediated knowledge sharing strategy developed and implemented with partners and<br />

online, web-based repository of learning materials designed and developed in the public domain with<br />

appropriate capacity building<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 10.1.1 Design of a Blend of Tools in Knowledge Sharing<br />

Work reported in the earlier report (2009) on Agropedia design and development was continued, with a focus on<br />

refinements and feature additions. As stated earlier, Agropedia (http://agropedia.net) is built on the Open Source<br />

Drupal content management platform with Wiki and blogging features. At its core is the deployment of crop<br />

knowledge models for nine crops (which include models for all the five mandate crops of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>). Agropedia<br />

has semantic features enabled so that a much closer relationship between concepts as contrasted with<br />

words/strings of letters is achieved. Search results can offer outputs from different languages.<br />

During <strong>2010</strong>, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> led the final stages of development of a comprehensive architecture for agricultural<br />

information services and knowledge management, involving aggregation of information from multiple sources<br />

and delivery/exchange with different stakeholders in multiple modes including rural information kiosks or<br />

individually-owned cell phones. A non-detailed view emerging from experiences specific to VASAT in India is<br />

provided in Figure 1.<br />

Figure 10.1 Research Extension Farmer Continuum<br />

What emerges from VASAT work in the last three years is that present IT potential and solutions for the<br />

agricultural research, education and extension sectors, as widely understood among IARC’s, are largely<br />

inadequate for the scale and complexity of requirements. New architectures for impact-oriented information<br />

services are necessary for this sector. Our work with GFAR in organizing a pre-GCARD global workshop on<br />

356


knowledge sharing in agriculture (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>, Dec 2009) revealed the significant gaps between necessary and<br />

available technologies in this regard (GFAR-<strong>ICRISAT</strong> proceedings available at<br />

http://test1.icrisat.org/Training/ICR_ARD_CM.htm)).Clearly, NARES, IARCS’s, ARI’s and international<br />

organizations need to form specific partnerships to address this challenge, with ICT resource institutions playing<br />

the roles of solution providers and not as providers of just contractual or consulting services.<br />

Design of an advanced online repository for extension-oriented learning materials<br />

VASAT has a historical strength in being a pioneer in deploying and testing new techniques in digital content<br />

management, oriented towards extension communication and learning. For long, VASAT has advocated<br />

granularity in generation of extension materials since practicing farmers and allied stakeholders are known not<br />

to have the time or opportunity to study complex documents. A set of techniques broadly called development of<br />

re-usable learning objects (RLO) came into prominence in the earlier part of the decade. VASAT has harnessed<br />

this approach in a number of training programs for faculty of agricultural universities. It was also ingrained in<br />

the Agrocuri initiative. A multi-stakeholder workshop was held in May 2009 in collaboration with the U Florida<br />

and the discussions there led to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> taking the initiative to formulate a consortium to deploy the practice<br />

of RLO’s in agricultural extension. Three Open and Distance Learning (ODL) institutions came forward to join<br />

the consortium, namely, the School of Agriculture of the Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU),<br />

School of Agriculture of the YC Maharashtra OU (YCMOU) and the ODL Directorate of Tamil Nadu<br />

Agricultural University (TNAU). The Consortium was formulated to test various processes for rapid creation of<br />

learning materials in support of pre-university education for practicing farmers in horticulture nursery<br />

management, high value crop production, Integrated Pest Management in Agro-horticulture, Integrated Nutrient<br />

Management in Agro-horticulture and post harvest value addition in Agro-horticulture. This repository has been<br />

prototyped during <strong>2010</strong> and was presented to the partners for review and testing. It has the following features:<br />

• Search interface,<br />

• Content Index, Browse<br />

• Create a Course and view it.<br />

• Separate Handlers/Players for different file type like: doc, ppt, flv, mp4, ogg, pdf, jpg, png, gif<br />

• Chat Interfaces (Public & Private)<br />

• Google Analytics<br />

Based on their inputs, the finalized online repository has been made available on the Web at www.agrilore.org. .<br />

Figure 10.2 Screenshot of Agrilore portal containing draft RLO’s<br />

357


This repository is also semantically enabled to reflect the subject matter specificity (in this case, horticultural<br />

crops). More importantly, it allows a user of a learning material to judge the educational and training value of a<br />

resource, even as it allows the user to connect with other users of the same material. These features are<br />

unprecedented in the sector of agriculture and will prove to be breakthrough in the medium term.<br />

AGROVOC Revision and Building of AgroTags<br />

An important development during this year was the completion of the comprehensive revision of the<br />

AGROVOC in English which was completed by <strong>ICRISAT</strong>, thus making an important IPG even more current<br />

and effective. As of December <strong>2010</strong> the quantitative results of the revision process are:<br />

Terms<br />

Before revision (nos.)<br />

Dec 2009<br />

After revision (nos.)<br />

Dec <strong>2010</strong><br />

Broader Term (BT) 28625 33161<br />

Narrower Term (NT) 28617 33161<br />

Related Term (RT) 28219 46214<br />

USE 19158 Completely revised with<br />

proper relations<br />

USE For (UF) 17386 Completely revised with<br />

proper relations<br />

The AGROVOC effort at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> also led to the development of AgroTags, a semantically-related subset of<br />

terms in AGROVOC (English) that are relevant to agricultural research sector<br />

Figure 10.3 Terms at first hierarchical level of Agrovoc and Agrotags<br />

A highly significant development based on AgroTags is an automatic tagging system for research documents in<br />

agriculture. Called AgroTagger, this has been prototyped and developed by the Indian Institute of Technology<br />

Kanpur, and is available as an online service for ANY institution in the world and is further available as a plug-<br />

358


in for the Open Source DSpace that is used for hosting institutional repositories world wide. These are IPG’s in<br />

every sense of the term and are wholly unprecedented.<br />

Figure 10.4 Agrotagger – an automatic keyword assignment system (available as open source application<br />

via Google projects)<br />

Figure 10.5: <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Institutional Repository with Agrotags<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 10.2 New approaches for enhanced access to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> IPG’s developed, tested and<br />

shared with partners<br />

In Agrovoc phase II <strong>ICRISAT</strong> extensively tested the VocBench portal in its beta version. All the issues noted<br />

during such testing have been reported in online project issue tracker (http://code.google.com/p/agrovoc-csworkbench/issues/list).<br />

VocBench (http://agrovoc.mimos.my/vocbenchv1.1i/) is a web-based multilingual<br />

vocabulary management tool developed by FAO. Nearly 2000 definitions and related images were collected<br />

offline with specific format (provided by FAO) including source, image/definition, and date of collection etc.<br />

from relevant and authenticated sources (in particular, MeSH, WordNet, FAO Glossary of terms etc.) . Nearly<br />

359


70% of the Agrovoc terms have been translated in order to develop the Telugu version of Agrovoc, the primary<br />

language of Andhra Pradesh state of India spoken by 84 million people (as per Census of India, <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Figure 10.6 Screenshot of VocBench portal published by FAO in partnership with <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

10.2.1 Trials with delivering advisory information over mobile telephony<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> facilitated the use of mobile telephony (voice and text) using the Web-based aAQUA platform<br />

(www.aaqua.org) in 2009. At the later stage in <strong>2010</strong>, this was further integrated with call center technology with<br />

Agropedia as the content platform. Analysis of callback and disconnection by the users was carried out in detail<br />

by partner, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. The results show that the optimal duration of the voice clip<br />

should be about 40 seconds. Longer clips are not listened to fully, this is based on an analysis of nearly 990 000<br />

transactions,<br />

Fig 10.7 Statistical analysis of voice-over-mobile services provided through aAQUA in one linguistic<br />

region<br />

360


10.2.2 Tests and trials on the use of online fertilizer recommendation systems at farm level<br />

Following the development of geo-spatial information techniques to visually represent soil nutrient information,<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> facilitated the development of an online system for fertilizer recommendation for testing in the north<br />

eastern zone of Karnataka State, India. The design was carried out by the IIITM-Kerala while the University of<br />

Agricultural Sciences- Raichur, Karnataka, conducted a comprehensive deployment and trial with 1897 farmers<br />

covering 19 crops. During the year, 1160 farm-level fertilizer recommendation reports were generated. Impact<br />

studies carried out by UASR showed that the adoption of the recommendations was highest among groundnut<br />

and cotton farmers, particularly the adoption of recommended fertilizer application (100 % in groundnut and 71<br />

% in cotton over 0% before OFR ) The adoption of bio fertilizer application was 62% in rice followed by 43%<br />

in cotton over 0% before OFR. This is an example of how a complete chain of information services can be built<br />

from expert-level data sets to offer farm-level advisory.<br />

Table 1. Adoption levels of online fertilizer recommendation (OFR) by farmers at UAS Raichur (in<br />

percentage)<br />

Sl. Crop Recommended Split application Bio fertilizer Organic manure<br />

No.<br />

Nutrients applied of ‘N’<br />

application application<br />

Percentage<br />

Before<br />

OFR<br />

After<br />

OFR<br />

Before<br />

OFR<br />

After<br />

OFR<br />

Before<br />

OFR<br />

After<br />

OFR<br />

Before<br />

OFR<br />

After<br />

OFR<br />

1. Paddy 0 62 100 100 0 62 100 100<br />

2. Groundnut 0 100 50 75 0 0 75 100<br />

3. Safflower 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

4. sunflower 0 50 100 100 0 0 0 0<br />

5. Sugarcane 0 25 100 100 0 0 0 0<br />

6. Cotton 0 71 85 100 0 43 86 100<br />

10.2. Use of GIS derived products for drought vulnerability assessment and preparedness supported by<br />

using ICT based agro advisory.<br />

With the widespread availability of mobile phone networks and handsets, in rural areas, text/SMS solutions<br />

were tried out. The granularised text content extracted from RLO’s has been sent through text/SMS mode in<br />

Telugu, the local language. Relevant farm advisories were also sent according to the crop calendar for the kharif<br />

season. Only viable or working numbers were used and 123 volunteers opted to receive the messages and<br />

participate in subsequent analyses. Since video conferencing requires volunteers and farmers to move to a<br />

central location, imposing an overhead, we have also set up an audio-conferencing facility that enables several<br />

people to hear an expert via speaker phone. This has been introduced less than a year back, and is found to be<br />

even more popular since it can be carried by a volunteer to any village where a mobile or landline connection is<br />

available. During <strong>2010</strong>, we conducted 57 videoconference sessions of 2 hours each and 35 audio conference<br />

sessions of one hour. In these session experts discussed about protection and production practices of crops like<br />

castor, finger millet, paddy, groundnut, vegetables along with livestock. The records are maintained by the<br />

Adrasha Mahila Samaikhya (AMS) located at Adakkal Mandal, Andhra Pradesh State. Adakkal lies between<br />

latitudes 16 o 28’ 28.3’ to 16 o 41’ 1.98”N and longitudes 77 o 2’ 47.34” to 78 o 2’ 46”. This organization maintains<br />

videoconference at the hub and audio conferences in different villages. It was found that audio/video conference<br />

based agro-advisory, benefits more farmers with in-time solutions from experts when compared to conventional<br />

advisory. This audio/video conference based agro-advisory can be more effective particularly in a country like<br />

India, where one agriculture extension officer is available for approximately 20 villages covering 6000 farmers.<br />

After considering India Meteorological Department (http://www.imd.gov.in/) and International Research<br />

Institute for Climate and Society (http://portal.iri.columbia.edu/portal/server.pt), Columbia prediction, <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

released drought vulnerability map of the 450 mm scenario along with the long range prediction of rainfall. This<br />

prediction was made available by <strong>ICRISAT</strong> to rural communities in Adakkal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District<br />

(http://vasat.icrisat.ac.in/images/Adakkal%20location.JPG ) through Village Knowledge centers. The<br />

predicted rainfall was validated with the observed rainfall data recorded by village network assistants and<br />

uploaded on VASAT Wiki site. It was observed that the recorded rainfall was very much close to the predicted<br />

values. This study has shown that local seasonal weather predictions along with ICT based agro-advisory on<br />

crop planning is of great use for smallholder farmers of Semi-arid tropics. Impact study was conducted to know<br />

about <strong>ICRISAT</strong>’s predication on micro-level drought preparedness. Random samples of 20 to 25 people per<br />

village (around 450 farmers) were interviewed in 21 village of Adakkal Mandal. From the survey and analysis,<br />

361


we concluded that almost 65 percent of the farmers found the drought-related advisory services useful, and were<br />

able to switch from normal cropping pattern to castor, pearl millet which withstood the drought. More than 60<br />

per cent of the cultivation costs for these farmers were saved because of the new advisory services. In one of the<br />

village more than 50% of the farmers shifted from paddy to drought resistant crops like castor and peal millet<br />

for kharif season (http://youtu.be/lm2IyXeYVXQ).<br />

Impact pathways<br />

Figure 10. 8 Micro level drought vulnerability scenarios developed for <strong>2010</strong><br />

All activities were designed to operate in a partnership mode:<br />

--a comprehensive architecture of information services in the stakeholder continuum from farmer to research<br />

institutions has been developed<br />

--three new online systems, for learning support, for fertilizer recommendations and for tagging research<br />

documents have been built and shared with partners<br />

--practice of crop knowledge models is now mainstreamed to include more crops and institutions<br />

--comprehensive test results for deploying mobile/voice telephony in agricultural extension have been made<br />

available.<br />

--AGROVOC has been comprehensively revised and placed on an online platform hosted by FAO.<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 10.1.1 Platform installed in 3 partner organizations:<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100% (Agropedia, Agrilore )<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India: Five States with population more than 25 millions: Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh<br />

Tamilnadu, Maharashtra; one with less than 25 million population: Uttarakhand; languages covered: five<br />

besides English<br />

362


Participating Partners:<br />

Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur, University of Agricultural Sciences- Raichur, GB Pant University for<br />

Agriculture and Tech, National Academy for Agricultural Research Management, Directorate of Open and<br />

Distance Learning, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbtore, School of Agriculture, Indira Gandhi<br />

National Open University, New Delhi , School of Agricultural Sciences, Yashwantrao Chavan<br />

MaharashtraOpen University - Nashik<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Indian Council of Agricultural Research<br />

Output 10.2: New approaches for enhanced access to <strong>ICRISAT</strong> IPG’s developed, tested and shared with<br />

partners<br />

Output target <strong>2010</strong> 10.2.1 New approaches based on web and mobile telephony tested for localization with<br />

two partners:<br />

Achievement of Output Target:<br />

100%<br />

Countries Involved:<br />

India (both web and mobile telephony);<br />

Participating Partners:<br />

Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur, GB Pant University for<br />

Agriculture and Technology, IIT Kanpur, Adarsha Mahila Samaikhya (AMS)<br />

Special Project Funding:<br />

Global- Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations; National- Indian Council of Agricultural<br />

Research.<br />

363


Publications<br />

Journal articles publised in Thomson Scientific/ISI Master Jounral List<br />

(http://www.thomsonscientific.com/cgi-bin/jrnlst/jloptions.cgi?PC=master)<br />

SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

1. 0238-0161 Acta Agronomica<br />

Hungarica<br />

2. 0137-5881 Acta Physilogiae<br />

Plantarum<br />

3. 1991-637X African Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

4. 1991-637X African Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

5. 1991-637X African Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

SHARMA SHIVALI, Chaudhary HK and Sethi<br />

GS. <strong>2010</strong>. In vitro and in vivo screening for<br />

drought tolerance in winter x spring wheat<br />

doubled haploids derived through chromosome<br />

elimination. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 58:301-<br />

312.<br />

Kumar S, Malik J, Thakur P, Kaistha S,<br />

Sharma KD, Upadhyaya HD, Berger JD and<br />

Nayyar H. <strong>2010</strong>. Growth and Metabolic<br />

Responses of Contrasting Chickpea (Cicer<br />

arietinum L.) Genotypes to Chilling Stress at<br />

Reproductive Phase. Acta Physilogiae Plantarum<br />

1-9: DOI 10.1007/s11738-010-0602-y.<br />

Ajeigbe HA, Singh BB, Ezeaku IE and Adeosun<br />

JO. <strong>2010</strong>. On-farm evaluation of improved<br />

cowpea-cereals cropping systems for croplivestock<br />

farmers: Cereals-cowpea systems in<br />

Sudan Savanna zone of Nigeria. African Journal<br />

of Agricultural Research 5(17):2297-2304.<br />

Available online at<br />

http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR.<br />

Ajeigbe HA, Singh BB, Adeosun JO and Ezeaku<br />

IE. <strong>2010</strong>. Participatory on-farm evaluation of<br />

improved legume-cereals cropping systems for<br />

crop-livestock farmers: Maize-double cowpea in<br />

Northern Guinea Savanna Zone of Nigeria.<br />

African Journal of Agricultural Research<br />

5(16):2080-2088. Available online at<br />

http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR.<br />

BELLOSTAS NATALIA, Sorensen Christian<br />

Jens, Nikiema Albert, Sorensen Hilmer,<br />

Pasternak Dov and Kumar Sanjeet. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Glucosinolate in leaves of Moringa species<br />

grown and disseminated in Niger. African Journal<br />

of Agricultural Research 5(11):1338-1340.<br />

364


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

6. 1991-637X African Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

7. 1684-5315 African Journal of<br />

Biotechnology<br />

8. 1684-5315 African Journal of<br />

Biotechnology<br />

9. 1684-5315 African Journal of<br />

Biotechnology<br />

10. 0021-857X Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

11. 0378-3774 Agricultural Water<br />

Management<br />

12. 0378-3774 Agricultural Water<br />

Management<br />

Kumar S, DAGNOKO S, Haougui A, Ratnadass<br />

A, Pasternak D and Kouame C. <strong>2010</strong>. Okra<br />

(Abelmoschus spp.) in West and Central Africa:<br />

Potential and progress on its improvement.<br />

African Journal of Agricultural Research<br />

5(25):3590-3598.<br />

Gopalakrishnan S, Kannan IGK, ALEKHYA G,<br />

Humayun P, SREE VIDYA M and DEEPTHI K.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Efficacy of Jatropha, Annona and<br />

Parthenium biowash on Sclerotium rolfsii, FOC<br />

and M. phaseolina pathogens of chickpea and<br />

sorghum. African Journal of Biotechnology<br />

9(47):8048-8057.<br />

Pande S, SHARMA M, Kishore GK, Shivram L<br />

and NAGA MANGALA U. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Characterization of Botrytis cinerea isolates from<br />

chickpea: DNA polymorphisms, cultural,<br />

morphological and virulence characteristics.<br />

African Journal of Biotechnology 9(46):7961-<br />

7967. Available online at<br />

http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB<br />

SUSAN MM, Quinata E, Sharma KK, Simon T,<br />

Gichuki MG and SANTIE M DE VILLIERS.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Surface sterilant effect on the regeneration<br />

efficiency from cotyledon explants of groundnut<br />

(Arachis hypogea L.) varieties adapted to eastern<br />

and southern Africa. African Journal of<br />

Biotechnology 9(20):2866-2871.<br />

SCHIPMANN C and Qaim M. <strong>2010</strong>. Spillovers<br />

from modern supply chains to traditional markets:<br />

product innovation and adoption by smallholders.<br />

Agricultural Economics 41:3-4:361-371.<br />

Rockstrom J, LOUISE KARLBERG, Wani SP,<br />

JENNI BARRON, Nuhu Hatibu, Theib Oweis,<br />

Adriana Bruggeman, Jalali Farahani and Zhu<br />

Qiang. <strong>2010</strong>. Managing water in rainfed<br />

agriculture – The need for a paradigm shift.<br />

Agricultural Water Management 97:543-550.<br />

Sahrawat KL, Wani SP, Pathak P and Rego TJ.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Managing natural resources of watersheds<br />

in the semi-arid tropics for improved soil and<br />

365


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

water quality: A review. Agricultural Water<br />

Management 97:375-381.<br />

13. 0972-2963 Animal Nutrition<br />

and Feed<br />

Technology<br />

14. 0972-2963 Animal Nutrition<br />

and Feed<br />

Technology<br />

15. 0003-4746 Annals of Applied<br />

Biology<br />

Nigam SN and Blummel M. <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivardependent<br />

variation in food-feed-traits in<br />

groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Animal<br />

Nutrition and Feed Technology 10S:39-48.<br />

Prasad KVSV, Khan AA, Vellaikumar S,<br />

Devulapalli R, Ramakrishna Reddy Ch, Nigam<br />

SN and Blummel M. <strong>2010</strong>. Observations on<br />

livestock productivity in sheep fed exclusively on<br />

haulms from ten different genotypes of<br />

groundnut. Animal Nutrition and Feed<br />

Technology 10S:121-126.<br />

HAMADINA EI, Craufurd PQ, Battey NH and<br />

Asiedu R. <strong>2010</strong>. In vitro micro-tuber initiation<br />

and dormancy in yam. Annals of Applied Biology<br />

doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.<strong>2010</strong>.00418.x<br />

Evaluation of stratification criteria for regional<br />

scale assessment of soil chemical fertility<br />

parameters in semi-arid tropical India.<br />

Communications in Soil Science and Plant<br />

Analysis 41:2100-2108.<br />

16. 0306-2619 Applied Energy Divakara BN, Upadhyaya HD, Wani SP and<br />

Laxmipathi Gowda CL. <strong>2010</strong>. Biology and<br />

genetics improvement of Jatropha curcas L: A<br />

review. Applied Energy 87:732-742.<br />

17. 0323-5408 Archives of<br />

Phytopathology<br />

and Plant<br />

Protection<br />

18. Australian Journal<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Engineering<br />

19. 1991-8178 Australian Journal<br />

of Basic and<br />

Applied Sciences<br />

Sharma R, Rao VP, Varshney RK, Prasanth VP,<br />

KANNAN S and Thakur RP. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Characterization of pathogenic and molecular<br />

diversity in Sclerospora graminicola, the causal<br />

agent of pearl millet downy mildew. Archives of<br />

Phytopathology and Plant Protection 43:538–551.<br />

Dixit PN and Chen D. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of spatially<br />

variable soil salinity on crop physiological<br />

properties, soil water content and yield of wheat<br />

in a semi arid environment. Australian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Engineering 1(3):93-100.<br />

Tajgarden T, Ayoubi S, Shataee S and<br />

Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Soil surface salinity<br />

prediction using ASTER data: Comparing<br />

366


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

statistical and geostatistical models. Australian<br />

Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 4: 457-<br />

467.<br />

20. 1932-104X Biofuels,<br />

Bioproducts and<br />

Biorefining<br />

21. 1537-5110 Biosystems<br />

Engineering<br />

22. 1471-2229 BMC Plant<br />

Biology<br />

23. 1471-2229 BMC Plant<br />

Biology<br />

24. 1471-2229 BMC Plant<br />

Biology<br />

25. 1471-2229 BMC Plant<br />

Biology<br />

26. 0133-3720 Cereal Research<br />

Communications<br />

Garg KK, KARLBERG LOUISE, Wani Suhas P<br />

and Berndes Göran. <strong>2010</strong>. Biofuel production on<br />

wastelands in India: opportunities and trade-offs<br />

for soil and water management at the watershed<br />

scale. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 1-<br />

34.<br />

Dixit PN and Chen D. <strong>2010</strong>. Farm Scale Zoning<br />

of Extreme Temperatures in the Southern Mallee,<br />

Victoria, Australia. Biosystems Engineering<br />

105:198-204.<br />

Koppolu R, Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL,<br />

Hoisington DA and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic<br />

relationships among seven sections of Genus<br />

Arachis studied by SSR markers. BMC Plant<br />

Biology 10:15. Doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-15.<br />

Raju NL, Gnanesh BN, LEKHA PT, BALAJI J,<br />

Pande S, Byregowda M, Singh NK and<br />

Varshney RK <strong>2010</strong>. The first set of EST resource<br />

for gene discovery and marker development in<br />

pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.). BMC Plant<br />

Biology 10:45 (doi:10.1186/1471-2229-10-45).<br />

Ravi K, Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Hoisington<br />

DA and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic<br />

relationships among 7 sections of genus Arachis<br />

studied by using SSR markers. BMC Plant<br />

Biology 10:1.<br />

Stich B, HAUSSMANN BIG, Pasam R, Bhosale<br />

S, Hash CT, Melchinger AE and Parzies H. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Patterns of molecular and phenotypic diversity in<br />

pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]<br />

from West and Central Africa and their relation to<br />

geographical and environmental parameters.<br />

BMC Plant Biology 10:216.<br />

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3<br />

017833/?tool=pubmed<br />

Yadav D, Gupta SK, Kulkarni VN, Rai KN and<br />

Behl RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Inheritance of A1 system of<br />

cytoplasmic nuclear male sterility in pearl millet<br />

367


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

[Pennisetum glaucum (L). R. Br.]. Cereal<br />

Research Communications 38:285–293.<br />

27. 0045-6535 Chemosphere Ramu K, Isobe T, Takahashi S, KIM E-Y, Min<br />

B-Y, We S-U, Tanabe S. <strong>2010</strong>. Spatial<br />

distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers<br />

and hexabromocyclododecanes in sediments from<br />

coastal waters of Korea. Chemosphere 79:713-<br />

719.<br />

28. 0010-3624<br />

eISSN:<br />

1532-2416<br />

29. 0010-3624<br />

eISSN:<br />

1532-2416<br />

30. 0010-3624<br />

eISSN:<br />

1532-2416<br />

Communications<br />

in Soil Science and<br />

Plant Analysis<br />

Communications<br />

in Soil Science and<br />

Plant Analysis<br />

Communications<br />

in Soil Science and<br />

Plant Analysis<br />

Rajashekhara Rao BK, Srinivasarao Ch,<br />

Sahrawat KL and Wani SP. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation of<br />

stratification criteria for regional scale assessment<br />

of soil chemical fertility parameters in semi-arid<br />

tropical India. Communications in Soil Science<br />

and Plant Analysis 41:2100-2108.<br />

Sahrawat KL, Wani SP, Pardhasaradhi G and<br />

Murthy KVS. <strong>2010</strong>. Diagnosis of secondary and<br />

micronutrient deficiencies and their management<br />

in rainfed agroecosystems: case study from<br />

Indian semi-arid tropics. Communications in Soil<br />

Science and Plant Analysis 41:346-360.<br />

Sahrawat KL, Jones MP, Diatta S and Sika M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Phosphorus response of Oryza sativa, O.<br />

glaberrima, and hybrid rice cultivars on an<br />

Ultisol. Communications in Soil Science and<br />

Plant Analysis 41:1445-1453.<br />

31. 0168-1699 Computers and<br />

Electronics in<br />

Agriculture<br />

32. 1836-5795 Crop and Pasture<br />

Science<br />

33. 1518-7853 Crop Breeding and<br />

Applied<br />

Biotechnology<br />

Dixit PN and Chen D. <strong>2010</strong>. Modification of a<br />

Spatially Referenced Crop Model to Simulate the<br />

Effect of Spatial Pattern of Subsoil Salinity.<br />

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 74:313-<br />

320.<br />

Sharma R, Deshpande SP, Senthilvel S, Rao VP,<br />

Rajaram V, Hash CT and Thakur RP. <strong>2010</strong>. SSR<br />

allelic diversity in relation to morphological traits<br />

among grain mold resistant and susceptible lines<br />

in sorghum. Crop and Pasture Science 61:230-<br />

240.<br />

Ojulong H, Labuschagne MT, Herselman L and<br />

Fregene M. <strong>2010</strong>. Yield traits as selection indices<br />

in seedling populations of cassava. Crop Breeding<br />

and Applied Biotechnology 10:191-196.<br />

368


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

34. 0011-183X Crop Science DEVI JM, Sinclair TR and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Genotypic Variation in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea<br />

L.) for Transpiration Sensitivity to Atmospheric<br />

Vapor Pressure Deficit. Crop Science 50:191–<br />

196.<br />

35. 0011-183X Crop Science Jagadish SVK, CAIRNS J, LAFITTE R,<br />

Wheeler TR, Price AH and Craufurd PQ. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Genetic analysis of heat tolerance at anthesis in<br />

rice (Oryza sativa L.). Crop Science 50:1-9.<br />

36. 0011-183X Crop Science Upadhyaya HD, Sharma NDRK, Ravishankar<br />

CR, Albrecht T, Narasimhudu Y, Singh SK,<br />

Varshney SK, Reddy VG, Singh S, Dwivedi SL,<br />

Wanyera N, Oduori COA, MGONJA MA,<br />

Kisandu DB, Parzies HK and Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Developing mini core collection in finger millet<br />

using multi-location data. Crop Science 50:1924-<br />

1931.<br />

37. 1836-5795 Crops and Pasture<br />

Science<br />

38. 1369-5266 Current Opinion in<br />

Plant Biology<br />

39. 1369-5266 Current Opinion in<br />

Plant Biology<br />

40. 0098-8472 Environmental and<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

Upadhyaya HD, SHARMA S, Ramulu B,<br />

BHATTACHARJEE R, Gowda CLL, Reddy VG<br />

and Singh S. <strong>2010</strong>. Variation for qualitative and<br />

quantitative traits and identification of traitspecific<br />

sources in new sorghum germplasm.<br />

Crops and Pasture Science 61(8):609-618.<br />

Cook DR and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. From genome<br />

studies to agricultural biotechnology: closing the<br />

gap between basic plant science and applied<br />

agriculture. Current Opinion in Plant Biology<br />

13:115-118.<br />

Glaszmann JC, Kilian B, Upadhyaya HD and<br />

Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Accessing genetic diversity<br />

for crop improvement. Current Opinion in Plant<br />

Biology 13:167-173.<br />

Rang ZW, Jagadish SVK, Zhou QM, Craufurd<br />

PQ and HEUER, S. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of Heat and<br />

Drought Stress on Pollen Germination and<br />

Spikelet Fertility in Rice. Environmental and<br />

Experimental Botany 70:58-65.<br />

41. 0014-2336 Euphytica BHARDWAJ R, Sandhu JS, KAUR L, Gupta<br />

SK, Gaur PM and Varshney R. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetics of<br />

369


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea.<br />

Euphytica 171:337-343.<br />

42. 0014-2336 Euphytica Dalvi VA, Saxena KB, Luo RH, and Li YR.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. An overview of male-sterility systems in<br />

pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.].<br />

Euphytica 173:397-407.<br />

43. 0014-2336 Euphytica Kassahun B, Bidinger FR, Hash CT and<br />

Kuruvinashetti S. <strong>2010</strong>. Stay-green expression<br />

in early generation sorghum [Sorghum bicolor<br />

(L.) Moench] QTL introgression lines. Euphytica<br />

172:351–362. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-009-0108-0.<br />

44. 0014-2336 Euphytica Saxena KB and Kumar RV. <strong>2010</strong>. Insect-aided<br />

natural out-crossing in four wild relatives of<br />

pigeonpea. Euphytica 173:329-335.<br />

45. 0014-2336 Euphytica Thudi M, Senthilvel S, Bottley A, Hash CT,<br />

Reddy AR, Feltus AF, Paterson AH, Hoisington<br />

DA and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. A comparative<br />

assessment of the utility of PCR-based marker<br />

systems in pearl millet. Euphytica 174:253-260.<br />

46. 0014-2336 Euphytica Upadhyaya HD, SHARMA SHIVALI, Singh<br />

Sube and Singh Murari. <strong>2010</strong>. Inheritance of<br />

drought resistance related traits in two crosses of<br />

groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica<br />

177:55-66.<br />

47. 0929-1873 European Journal<br />

of Plant Pathology<br />

48. 0929-1873 European Journal<br />

of Plant Pathology<br />

49. 1351-0754 European Journal<br />

of Soil Science<br />

SHARMA M, Pande S and Abhishek Rathore<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Effect of growth stages of chickpea on the<br />

genetic resistance of Ascochyta blight. European<br />

Journal of Plant Pathology 128:325-331, DOI<br />

10.1007/s10658-010-9641-x<br />

Thakur RP, Rao VP and Sharma R. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Influence of dosage, storage time and temperature<br />

on efficacy of metalaxyl-treated seed for the<br />

control of pearl millet downy mildew. European<br />

Journal of Plant Pathology 129:353-359 DOI<br />

10.1007/s10658-010-9679-9.<br />

Mapanda F, MUPINI J, Wuta W, Nyamangara J<br />

and Rees RM. <strong>2010</strong>. A cross-ecosystem<br />

assessment of the effects of land cover and land<br />

370


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

use on soil emission of selected greenhouse gases<br />

and related soil properties in Zimbabwe.<br />

European Journal of Soil Science 61:721-733.<br />

(DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.<strong>2010</strong>.01266.x).<br />

50. 0014-4797 Experimental<br />

Agriculture<br />

51. 0014-4797 Experimental<br />

Agriculture<br />

Dixit PN, Cooper PJM, Dimes J and Rao KPC.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Adding value to field-based agronomic<br />

research through climate risk assessment: a case<br />

study of maize production in Kitale, Kenya.<br />

Experimental Agriculture 47:317-338.<br />

PADMAJA K and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>. Seed coating<br />

with phosphorus in Pearl millet improves early<br />

stage plant vigor and yield in low P fertility soils.<br />

Experimental Agriculture 46:457-469.<br />

52. 0014-4797 Experimental<br />

Agriculture<br />

53. 0014-4797 Experimental<br />

Agriculture<br />

54. 0014-4797 Experimental<br />

Agriculture<br />

55. 0378-4290 Field Crops<br />

Research<br />

56. 0378-4290 Field Crops<br />

Research<br />

Rao KPC, Ndegwa WG, Kizito K and Oyoo A.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Climate variability and change: Farmer<br />

perceptions and understanding of intra-seasonal<br />

variability in rainfall and associated risk in semiarid<br />

Kenya. Experimental Agriculture 47: 1-25.<br />

Senda TS, Peden D, HOMANN-KEE TUI S,<br />

Sisito G, Van Rooyen A, Sikosana JLN. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Gendered livelihood implications for<br />

improvement of livestock water productivity in<br />

Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture 46:1–13 C_<br />

Cambridge University Press <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

doi:10.1017/S0014479710000943<br />

Sibanda A, HOMANN-KEE TUI S, Van Rooyen<br />

A, Dimes J, Nkomboni D and Sisito G.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.Understanding user communities<br />

perceptions of land use changes in the rangelands,<br />

Zimbabwe. Experimental Agriculture 46:1–16 C_<br />

Cambridge University Press <strong>2010</strong>,<br />

doi:10.1017/S001447971000092X<br />

Krishnamurthy L, Kashiwagi J, Gaur PM,<br />

Upadhyaya HD and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>. Sources of<br />

tolerance to terminal drought in the chickpea<br />

(Cicer arietinum L.) minicore germplasm. Field<br />

Crops Research 119:322-330.<br />

Upadhyaya HD, Ramesh S, SHARMA SHIVALI,<br />

Singh SK, Varshney SK, Sarma NDRK,<br />

Ravishankar CR, Narasimhudu Y, Reddy VG,<br />

371


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

Sahrawat KL, DHANALAKSHMI TN,<br />

MGONJA MA, Parzies HK, Gowda CLL and<br />

Singh Sube. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic diversity for grain<br />

nutrients contents in a core collection of finger<br />

millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.)<br />

germplasm. Field Crops Research 121:42-52.<br />

57. 0378-4290 Field Crops<br />

Research<br />

58. 0378-4290 Field Crops<br />

Research<br />

59. 0925-9864 Genetic Resources<br />

and Crop<br />

Evolution<br />

60. 0925-9864 Genetic Resources<br />

and Crop<br />

Evolution<br />

61. 0925-9864 Genetic Resources<br />

and Crop<br />

Evolution<br />

62. 0925-9864 Genetic Resources<br />

and Crop<br />

Evolution<br />

VOM BROCKE K, Trouche G, WELTZIEN E,<br />

BARRO-KONDOMBO CP, Gozé E and<br />

Chantereau J. <strong>2010</strong>. Participatory variety<br />

development for sorghum in Burkina Faso:<br />

Farmers’ selection and farmers’ criteria. Field<br />

Crops Research 119:183-194.<br />

Zeid M, YU JK, Goldowitz I, Denton ME,<br />

Costich DE, Jayasuriya CT, Saha M, Elshire<br />

R, Benscher D, Breseghello F, Munkvold J,<br />

Varshney RK, Belay G and Sorrells ME. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Cross-amplification of EST-derived markers<br />

among 16 grass species. Field Crops Research<br />

118:28-35.<br />

Mutegi E, Sagnard F, Muraya M, Kanyenji B,<br />

Rono B, MWONGERA C, Marangu C, Kamau<br />

J, Parzies H, DE VILLIERS S, Semagn K, Traoré<br />

PS, LABUSCHAGNE M. <strong>2010</strong>. Ecogeographical<br />

distribution of wild, weedy and cultivated<br />

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench in Kenya:<br />

Implications for conservation and crop-to-wild<br />

gene flow. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution<br />

75:243-253.<br />

MALLIKARJUNA N, Senthilvel S and<br />

Hoisington D. <strong>2010</strong>. Development of new sources<br />

of tetraploid Arachis to broaden the genetic base<br />

of cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).<br />

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. DOI<br />

10.1007/s10722-010-9627-8.<br />

Salem KFM, Varshney RK, RÖDER MS and<br />

Börner A. <strong>2010</strong>. EST-SSR based estimates on<br />

functional genetic variation in a barley (Hordeum<br />

vulgare L.) collection from Egypt. Genetic<br />

Resources and Crop Evolution 57:515-521.<br />

WEN W, Taba S, Shah T, Victor H, Tovar C and<br />

Yan J. <strong>2010</strong>. Detection of genetic integrity of<br />

conserved maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm in<br />

372


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

genebanks using SNP markers. Genetic<br />

Resources and Crop Evolution 58:189-207 DOI<br />

10.1007/s10722-010-9562-8<br />

63. Health Saxena KB, Kumar RV and SULTANA R. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Pigeonpea offers quality nutrition at low price.<br />

Health 2(11):1335-1344.<br />

64. 0367-8318 Indian Journal of<br />

Animal Sciences<br />

65. 0019-5200 Indian Journal of<br />

Genetics and Plant<br />

Breeding<br />

66. 0019-5200 Indian Journal of<br />

Genetics and Plant<br />

Breeding<br />

67. Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Genetics and<br />

Resources<br />

68. 0253-4355 Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Protection<br />

69. 0253-4355 Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Protection<br />

70. 0253-4355 Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Protection<br />

Dikshit A K and Birthal PS. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Environmental value of dung in mixed croplivestock<br />

systems. Indian Journal of Animal<br />

Sciences. 80(7):679-682.<br />

Sandhu JS, Gupta SK, Singh Inderjit, Gill BS<br />

and BHARDWAJ R. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetics of bushy<br />

growth habit and its implications in chickpea<br />

improvement. Indian Journal of Genetics and<br />

Plant Breeding 70:383-385.<br />

SANJANA REDDY P, Manohar Rao D, Reddy<br />

BVS and Ashok Kumar A. <strong>2010</strong>. Inheritance of<br />

male-fertility restoration in A 1 , A 2 , A 3 and A 4 (M)<br />

cytoplasmic male-sterility systems of sorghum<br />

[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], Indian Journal of<br />

Genetics and Plant Breeding 70:240-246.<br />

SANJANA REDDY P, Reddy BVS, Ashok<br />

Kumar A, Ramesh S, Sahrawat KL and<br />

Venkateswara Rao P. <strong>2010</strong>. Association of grain<br />

Fe and Zn contents with agronomic traits in<br />

sorghum. Indian Journal of Plant Genetics and<br />

Resources 23:280-284.<br />

KUMARI AD, Jagdishwar Reddy D and<br />

Sharma HC. <strong>2010</strong>. Stability of resistance to pod<br />

borer, Helicoverpa armigera in pigeonpea. Indian<br />

Journal of Plant Protection 38: 6-12.<br />

Prasada Rao RDVJ, JYOTHIRMAI MADHAVI<br />

K, Reddy AS, Varaprasad KS, Nigam SN,<br />

Sharma KK, Lava Kumar P and Waliyar F. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Non-transmission of tobacco streak virus isolate<br />

occurring in India through the seeds of some crop<br />

and weed hosts. Indian Journal of Plant<br />

Protection 37:92-96.<br />

Prasada Rao RDVJ, JYOTSNA MK, Reddy AS,<br />

Varaprasad KS, Nigam SN and Lava Kumar P.<br />

373


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Non-systemic infection of tobacco streak<br />

virus on cotton in Warangal district, Andhra<br />

Pradesh. Indian Journal of Plant Protection<br />

37:196-198.<br />

71. 0253-4355 Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Protection<br />

SHARMA M, Pande S, MANGALA UN,<br />

Tripathi S and Gaur PM. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic<br />

Resistance in Desi and Kabuli Chickpea Lines to<br />

Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium oxysporum<br />

f.sp. ciceris. Indian Journal of Plant Protection<br />

38:57-62.<br />

72. 1742-7584<br />

eISSN:<br />

1742-7592<br />

International<br />

Journal of Tropical<br />

Insect Science<br />

Dhillon MK and Sharma HC. <strong>2010</strong>. Influence of<br />

seed treatment and abiotic factors on damage to<br />

Bt and non-Bt cotton genotypes by the serpentine<br />

leaf miner, Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera:<br />

Agromyzidae). International Journal of Tropical<br />

Insect Science 30:127-131.<br />

73. 0192-5121 International<br />

Political Science<br />

Review<br />

REYES-GARCÍA V, Vadez V, Aragon J,<br />

Huanca T and Jagger P <strong>2010</strong>. The uneven reach<br />

of decentralization: A case study among<br />

Tsimane’ indigenous peoples in the Bolivian<br />

Amazon. International Political Science Review<br />

31:229-243.<br />

74. 0972-1665 Journal of<br />

Agrometeorology<br />

75. 0931-2250 Journal of<br />

Agronomy and<br />

Crop Science<br />

76. 0931-2048 Journal of Applied<br />

Entomology<br />

Boomiraj K, Wani Suhas P, Garg KK, Aggarwal<br />

PK and Palanisami K. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate change<br />

adaptation strategies for agro-ecosystem – a<br />

review. Journal of Agrometeorology 12(2):145-<br />

160.<br />

Banterng Poramate, Hoogenboom Gerrit,<br />

Patanothai Aran, Singh Piara, Wani Suhas P,<br />

Pathak P, Tongpoonpol S, Atichart S,<br />

SRIHABAN P, Buranaviriyakul S, Jintrawet,<br />

Attachai TC and Nguyen TC. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Application of the Cropping System Model<br />

(CSM)-CROPGRO-Soybean for Determining<br />

Optimum Management Strategies for Soybean in<br />

Tropical Environments. Journal of Agronomy and<br />

Crop Science 196: 231-242.<br />

Chamarthi SK, Sharma HC, NARASU LM and<br />

Dhillon MK. <strong>2010</strong>. Physico-chemical bases of<br />

resistance to shoot fly, Atherigona soccata in<br />

sorghum, Sorghum bicolor. Journal of Applied<br />

374


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

Entomology DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-<br />

0418.<strong>2010</strong>.01564.x<br />

77. 0931-2048 Journal of Applied<br />

Entomology<br />

78. 0256-0933 Journal of Crop<br />

Improvement<br />

79. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

80. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

81. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

82. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

83. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

Dhillon, MK and Sharma HC. <strong>2010</strong>. Chickpea<br />

mediated effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on<br />

Helicoverpa armigera and its larval parasitoid,<br />

Campoletis chlorideae. Journal of Applied<br />

Entomology doi: 10.1111/j.1439-<br />

0418.<strong>2010</strong>.01506.x.<br />

BHATNAGAR-MATHUR P, Shridhar Rao J,<br />

Vadez V and Sharma KK <strong>2010</strong>. Transgenic<br />

Strategies for Improved Drought Tolerance in<br />

Legumes of Semi-Arid Tropics. Journal of Crop<br />

Improvement 24:92-111.<br />

FISCHINGER SA, HRISTOZKOVA M,<br />

Mainassara ZA and Joachim Schulze. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Elevated CO 2 concentration aroud alfalfa nodules<br />

increases N2 fixation. Journal of Experimental<br />

Botany 61:131-142.<br />

Jagadish SVK, Muthurajan R, Oane R and<br />

Craufurd PQ. <strong>2010</strong>. Physiological and proteomic<br />

approaches to dissect reproductive stage heat<br />

tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of<br />

Experimental Botany 61:143-156.<br />

KHOLOVÁ J, Hash CT, Kakkera A, KOČOVÁ<br />

M and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>a. Constitutive waterconserving<br />

mechanisms are correlated with the<br />

terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet<br />

[Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. Journal of<br />

Experimental Botany 61:369–377.<br />

DOI:10.1093/jxb/erp314.<br />

KHOLOVÁ J, Hash CT, Kumar PL, Yadav RS,<br />

KOCﬞOVÁ M and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>b. Terminal<br />

drought tolerant pearl millet [Pennisetum<br />

glaucum (L.) R. Br.] have high leaf ABA and<br />

limit transpiration at high vapor pressure deficit.<br />

Journal of Experimental Botany 61:1431-1441.<br />

STEPHANIE A, FISCHINGER, MARIETA<br />

HRISTOZKOVA, Zaman-Allah Mainassara and<br />

Joachim Schulze. <strong>2010</strong>. Elevated CO 2<br />

concentration around alfalfa nodules increases N2<br />

fixation. Journal of Experimental Botany 61<br />

(1):131-142.<br />

375


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

84. 0022-0957 Journal of<br />

Experimental<br />

Botany<br />

85. 1459-0255 Journal of food,<br />

Agriculture and<br />

Environment<br />

86. 0022-1503 Journal of<br />

Heredity<br />

87. 0022-1910 Journal of Insect<br />

Physiology<br />

88. 0971-7811 Journal of Plant<br />

Biochemistry and<br />

Biotechnology<br />

89. 0075-5192 Kasetsart Journal<br />

(Natural Science)<br />

90. 0025-326X Marine Pollution<br />

Bulletin<br />

Yadav RS, SEGHAL D and Vadez V <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Using genetic mapping and genomics approaches<br />

in understanding and 1 improving drought<br />

tolerance in pearl millet. Journal of Experimental<br />

Botany 62:397-408 doi:10.1093/jxb/erq265.<br />

Babaji BA, Yahaya RA, Mahadi MA, Jaliya<br />

MM, Sharifai AI, Ajeigbe HA, Kura HN, Arunah<br />

OL, Ibrahim A and Muhammad AA. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Response of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L)<br />

Walp] to residual effect of different rates of sheep<br />

manure on chilli pepper (Capsicum annum).<br />

Journal of food, Agriculture and Environment<br />

8(2):339-348.<br />

Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Dalvi VA, Pandey LB<br />

and Gaddikeri G. <strong>2010</strong>. Development of<br />

cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterility, its inheritance,<br />

and potential use in hybrid pigeonpea breeding.<br />

Journal of Heredity 101:497-503.<br />

Parde VD, Sharma HC and Kachole MS. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

In vivo inhibition of Helicoverpa armigera gut<br />

pro-proteinase activation by non-host plant<br />

protease inhibitors. Journal of Insect Physiology<br />

56:1315-1324.<br />

Thudi M, MANTHENA R, Wani SP,<br />

TATIKONDA L, Hoisington DA and Varshney<br />

RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Analysis of genetic diversity in<br />

Pongamia [Pongamia pinnata (L) Pierrre] using<br />

AFLP markers. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and<br />

Biotechnology 19:209-216.<br />

Reddy BVS, Ashok Kumar A and SANJANA<br />

REDDY P. <strong>2010</strong>. Recent advances in sorghum<br />

improvement research at <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. Kasetsart<br />

Journal (Natural Science) 44:499-506.<br />

Takahashi S, OSHIHOI T, Ramu K, Isobe T,<br />

Ohmori K, Kubodera T and Tanabe S. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Organohalogen compounds in deep-sea fishes<br />

from the Western North Pacific, Off-Tohoku,<br />

Japan: contamination status and bioaccumulation<br />

profiles. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60:187-196.<br />

91. 1380-3743 Molecular Bheema Lingeswara Reddy IN, Srinivas Reddy<br />

376


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

Breeding<br />

92. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

93. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

94. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

95. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

96. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

97. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

98. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

D, LAKSHMI NARASU M and<br />

Sivaramakrishnan S. <strong>2010</strong>. Characterization of<br />

Disease Resistance Gene Homologues isolated<br />

from Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana(L.)<br />

Gaertn) Molecular Breeding. DOI<br />

10.1007/s11032-010-9433-1(on line).<br />

Gupta PK, Balyan HS and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Quantitative genetics and plant genomics: an<br />

overview. Molecular Breeding 26:133–134.<br />

NEUMANN K, Kobiljsdki B, Deneiae S,<br />

Varshney RK, Börner A. <strong>2010</strong>. Genome-wide<br />

association mapping: a case study in bread wheat<br />

(Triticum aestivum L.). Molecular Breeding<br />

27:37-58 DOI: 10.1007/s11032-010-9411-7.<br />

Ramu P, Deshpande SP, Senthilvel S,<br />

JAYASHREE B, Billot C, Deu M, Reddy LA<br />

and Hash CT. <strong>2010</strong>. In-silico mapping of<br />

important genes and markers available in public<br />

domain for efficient sorghum breeding.<br />

Molecular Breeding 26:409-418.<br />

Saxena RK, Saxena KB and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Application of SSR markers for molecular<br />

characterization of hybrid parents and purity<br />

assessment of ICPH 2438 hybrid of pigeonpea<br />

[Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Molecular Breeding<br />

26:371-380.<br />

Singh PK, Mergoum M, Adhikari TB, Shah T,<br />

Ghavami F and Kianian SF <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic and<br />

molecular analysis of wheat tan spot resistance<br />

effective against Pyrenophora tritici-repentis<br />

races 2 and 5. Molecular Breeding 25:369-379.<br />

Varshney RK, Baum M, Guo P, GRANDO S,<br />

CECCARELLI S and Graner A. <strong>2010</strong>. Features<br />

of SNP and SSR diversity in a set of ICARDA<br />

barley germplasm collection. Molecular Breeding<br />

26:229-242.<br />

Varshney RK, Penmetsa RV, Dutta S, Kulwal<br />

PL, Saxena RK, Datta S, Sharma TR, Rosen B,<br />

CARRASQUILLA-GRACIA N, Farmer AD,<br />

DUBEY A, Saxena KB, Gao J, Fakrudin B,<br />

Singh MN, Singh BP, Wanjari KB, YUAN M,<br />

Srivastava RK, Kilian A, Upadhyaya HD,<br />

MALLIKARJUNA N, Town CD, Bruening GE,<br />

377


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

He G, May GD, McCombie R, Jackson SA,<br />

Singh NK and Cook DR. <strong>2010</strong>. Pigeonpea<br />

genomics initiative (PGI): an international effort<br />

to improve crop productivity of pigeonpea<br />

(Cajanus cajan L.). Molecular Breeding 26:393-<br />

408.<br />

99. 1380-3743 Molecular<br />

Breeding<br />

100. 1755-098X Molecular Ecology<br />

Resources<br />

Yan J, YANG X, Shah T, Sanchez-Villeda H, Li<br />

J, WARBURTON ML, Zhou Y, Crouch JH and<br />

Xu Y. <strong>2010</strong>. High-throughput SNP genotyping<br />

with the GoldenGate assay in maize. Molecular<br />

Breeding 25:441–451.<br />

Estep M, Van Mourik T, Muth P, Guindo D,<br />

Parzies, HK, Koita O, WELTZIEN E and<br />

Bennetzen JL. <strong>2010</strong>. Development of<br />

microsatellite markers for characterizing diversity<br />

in a parasitic witchweed, Striga hermonthica<br />

(Orobanchaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources<br />

10:1098-1105.<br />

101. 0301-486X Mycopathologia Sharma R, Thakur RP, Senthilvel S, NAYAK<br />

SN, Veera Reddy S, Rao VP and Varshney RK.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Identification and characterization of<br />

toxigenic Fusaria associated with sorghum grain<br />

mold complex in India. Mycopathologia. Doi<br />

10.1007/s11046-010-9354-x.<br />

102. 1385-1314<br />

eISSN:<br />

1573-0867<br />

103. 1385-1314<br />

eISSN:<br />

1573-0867<br />

104. 1385-1314<br />

eISSN:<br />

Nutrient Cycling<br />

in Agroecosystem<br />

Nutrient Cycling<br />

in Agroecosystems<br />

Nutrient Cycling in<br />

Agroecosystems<br />

378<br />

Satoshi Nakamura, Keiichi Hayashi, Hide Omae,<br />

Tabo Ramadjita, Fatondji Dougbedji,<br />

Hitoshi Shinjo, Addam Kiari Saidou and<br />

Satoshi Tobita. <strong>2010</strong>. Validation of soil organic<br />

carbon dynamics model in the semi-arid tropics in<br />

Niger, West Africa. Nutrient Cycling in<br />

Agroecosystem 1-11-11, doi: 10.1007/s10705-<br />

010-9402-4.<br />

MASVAYA EN, NYAWASHA RW, Zingore S,<br />

Nyamangara J, Delve RJ and Giller KE. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Spatial soil fertility variability and plant nutrient<br />

uptake: A case of two smallholder farming areas<br />

in contrasting agro-ecological zones in<br />

Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems<br />

88(1):111-120 (DOI: 10.1007/s10705-009-9262-<br />

y).<br />

Nyamangara J and Nyagumbo I. <strong>2010</strong>. Interactive<br />

effects of selected nutrient resources and tied-


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

1573-0867 ridging on plant performance in a semi-arid<br />

smallholder farming environment in central<br />

Zimbabwe. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems<br />

88(1):103-109 (DOI: 10.1007/s10705-009-9282-<br />

7).<br />

105. 0179-9541 Plant Breeding Saxena KB, SULTANA R, MALLIKARJUNA<br />

N, Saxena RK, Kumar RV, Sawargaonkar SL and<br />

Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Male-sterility systems in<br />

pigeonpea and their role in enhancing yield. Plant<br />

Breeding 129:125-134.<br />

106. 0179-9541 Plant Breeding Saxena RK, PRATHIMA C, Saxena KB,<br />

Hoisington DA, Singh NK and Varshney RK.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Novel SSR markers for polymorphism<br />

detection in pigeonpea (Cajanus spp.). Plant<br />

Breeding 129:142-148.<br />

107. 0179-9541 Plant Breeding Saxena RK, Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Hoisington<br />

DA and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. SSR-based diversity<br />

in elite pigeonpea genotypes for developing<br />

mapping populations to map resistance to<br />

Fusarium wilt and sterility mosaic disease. Plant<br />

Breeding 129:135-141.<br />

108. Plant Breeding,<br />

Early View<br />

109. 0140-7791 Plant Cell and<br />

Environment<br />

Rabbi IY, Parzies HK, Kiambi D, HAUSSMANN<br />

BIG, Folkertsma R and Geiger HH. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Experimental studies on pollen-mediated gene<br />

flow in Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench using<br />

male-sterile bait plants; Plant Breeding, Early<br />

View; S.1-8 DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-<br />

0523.<strong>2010</strong>.01775.x<br />

WITZEL K, WEIDNER A, Surabhi GK,<br />

Varshney RK, Kuenze G, Buck-Sorlin GH,<br />

Börner A and Mock HP. <strong>2010</strong>. Comparative<br />

analysis of the grain proteome fraction in barley<br />

genotypes with contrasting salinity tolerance<br />

during germination. Plant Cell and Environment<br />

33:211-222.<br />

110. 0721-7714 Plant Cell <strong>Report</strong>s BHATNAGAR M, PRASAD K,<br />

BHATNAGAR-MATHUR P, NARASU ML,<br />

Waliyar F and Sharma KK. <strong>2010</strong>. An efficient<br />

method for the production of marker-free<br />

transgenic plants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea<br />

L.). Plant Cell <strong>Report</strong>s 25(5):495-502.<br />

379


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

111. 0191-2917 Plant Disease Sharma R, Rao VP, Upadhyaya HD, Reddy VG<br />

and Thakur RP. <strong>2010</strong>. Resistance to grain mold<br />

and downy mildew in a mini core collection of<br />

sorghum germplasm. Plant Disease 94:439-444.<br />

112. Plant Genetic<br />

Resources<br />

113. 1479-2621 Plant Genetic<br />

Resources -<br />

Characterization &<br />

Utilization<br />

114. 1479-2621 Plant Genetic<br />

Resources:<br />

Characterization<br />

and Utilization<br />

115. 1479-2621 Plant Genetic<br />

Resources:<br />

Characterization<br />

and Utilization<br />

116. 1479-2621 Plant Genetic<br />

Resources:<br />

Characterization<br />

and Utilization<br />

117. Plant, Cell &<br />

Environment<br />

Moses M, Muraya Hartwig, Geiger H, Fabrice<br />

Sagnard, SANTIE DE VILLIERS and Parzies<br />

HK. <strong>2010</strong>. Geographical patterns of phenotypic<br />

diversity and structure of Kenyan wild sorghum<br />

populations (Sorghum spp) as an aid to<br />

germplasm collection and conservation strategy.<br />

Plant Genetic Resources<br />

doi:10.1017/S1479262110000225<br />

Rabbi I, Geiger HH, HAUSSMANN BIG,<br />

Kiambi D, Folkertsma R and Parzies HK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Impact of farmers’ practices and seed systems on<br />

the genetic structure of common sorghum<br />

cultivars in Kenya and Sudan. Plant Genetic<br />

Resources - Characterization & Utilization 8:116-<br />

126 DOI: 10.1017/S147926211000002X.<br />

Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Gowda CLL and<br />

Singh S. <strong>2010</strong>. Identification and evaluation of<br />

vegetable type pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.)<br />

Millsp.) in the world germplasm collection at<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> Genebank. Plant Genetic Resources:<br />

Characterization and Utilization 8(2):162-170-<br />

<strong>2010</strong>; 1–9; doi:10.1017/S1479262110000122.<br />

Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Irshad Ahmed M,<br />

Gowda CLL and HAUSSMANN BIG. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Identification of geographical gaps in the pearl<br />

millet germplasm from West and Central Africa<br />

assembled at <strong>ICRISAT</strong> genebank. Plant Genetic<br />

Resources: Characterization and Utilization<br />

8(1):45-51.<br />

Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Irshad M and Gowda<br />

CLL. <strong>2010</strong>. Identification of gaps in pearl millet<br />

germplasm from Asia conserved at the <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

genebank. Plant Genetic Resources:<br />

Characterization and Utilization 8:267-276.<br />

Flowers TJ, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL,<br />

Krishnamurthy L, Samineni S, Siddique KHM,<br />

Turner NC, Vadez V, Varshney RK and Colmer<br />

TD. <strong>2010</strong>. Salt sensitivity in chickpea. Plant, Cell<br />

380


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

& Environment 33:490-509.<br />

118. 1932-6203 PLoS ONE Yab J, Shah T, WARBURTON ML, Buckler<br />

ES, McMullen MD and Crouch J. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic<br />

Characterization and Linkage Disequilibrium<br />

Estimation of a Global Maize Collection Using<br />

SNP Markers. PLoS ONE 4(12): e8451<br />

119. 0036-8075 Science Herrero M, Thornton PK, Notenbaert AM, Wood<br />

S, Msangi S, Freeman HA, Bossio D, Dixon J,<br />

Peters M, van de Steeg J, Lyman J, Parthasarathy<br />

Rao P, Macmillan S, Gerard B, McDermott J,<br />

Sere C and Rosegrant M. <strong>2010</strong>. Smart<br />

investments in sustainable food production:<br />

Revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems. Science<br />

327:822-825.<br />

120. 0934-0882 Sexual Plant<br />

Reproduction<br />

121. 0266-0032 Soil Use and<br />

Management<br />

Dwivedi SL, Perotti E, HD Upadhyaya and Ortiz<br />

R. <strong>2010</strong>. Sexual and apomictic plant reproduction<br />

in the genomics era: exploring the mechanisms<br />

potentially useful in crop plants. Sexual Plant<br />

Reproduction 23:265-279.<br />

Valluru R, Vadez V, Hash CT, and Karanam P.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. A minute P application contributes to a<br />

better establishment of pearl millet (Pennisetum<br />

americanum (L.) R. Br.) seedling in P deficient<br />

soils. Soil Use and Management 26:39–43. doi:<br />

10.1111/j.1475-2743.2009.00245.x<br />

122. Swara Rao KPC. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate change: What it means<br />

for agriculture in Eastern Africa. Swara 1:43-45.<br />

123. 0040-5752 Theoretical and<br />

Applied Genetics<br />

124. 0040-5752 Theoretical and<br />

Applied Genetics<br />

MUTEGI E, Sagnard F, Semagn K, Deu M,<br />

MURAYA M, Kanyenji B, de VILLIERS S,<br />

Kiambi D, Herselman L and Labuschagne M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Genetic structure and relationships within<br />

and between cultivated and wild sorghum<br />

(Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in Kenya as<br />

revealed by microsatellite markers. Theoretical<br />

and Applied Genetics doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-<br />

1504-5.<br />

NAYAK SN, Zhu H, VARGHESE N, Datta S,<br />

Choi H-K, Horres R, JÜNGLING R, Singh J,<br />

Kavi Kishor PB, Sivaramakrihnan S,<br />

Hoisington DA, Kahl G, Winter P, Cook DR and<br />

Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Integration of novel SSR<br />

381


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

and gene-based SNP marker loci in the chickpea<br />

genetic map and establishment of new anchor<br />

points with Medicago truncatula genome.<br />

Theoretical and Applied Genetics 120:1415–144.<br />

125. 0040-5752 Theoretical and<br />

Applied Genetics<br />

126. 0040-5752 Theoretical<br />

Applied Genetics<br />

127. 0167-7799 Trends<br />

Biotechnology<br />

128. 0959-3993 World Journal of<br />

Microbiology and<br />

Biotechnology<br />

129. 0959-3993 World Journal of<br />

Microbiology and<br />

Biotechnology<br />

YANG X, Yan J, Shah T, WARBURTON ML,<br />

Li Q, Li L, Gao Y, Chai Y, Fu Z, Zhou Y, Xu<br />

S, Bai G, Meng Y, Zheng Y and Li J. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Genetic analysis and characterization of a new<br />

maize association mapping panel for quantitative<br />

trait loci dissection. Theoretical and Applied<br />

Genetics 121:417-431.<br />

Khedikar YP, Gowda MVC,<br />

SARVAMANGALA C, PATGAR KV,<br />

Upadhyaya HD and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong> A QTL<br />

study on late leaf spot and rust revealed one<br />

major QTL for molecular breeding for rust<br />

resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.).<br />

Theoretical Applied Genetics 121:971–984.<br />

Varshney RK, Glaszmann J-C, Leung H and<br />

Ribaut JM. <strong>2010</strong>. More genomic resources for<br />

less-studied crops. Trends Biotechnology 28:452-<br />

460<br />

Gopalakrishnan S, Humayun P, Kiran BK,<br />

Kannan IGK, Vidhya MS, DEEPTHI K and<br />

Rupela O. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation of bacteria isolated<br />

from rice rhizosphere for biological control of<br />

sorghum caused by M. phaseolina. World Journal<br />

of Microbiology and Biotechnology DOI<br />

10.1007/s11274-010-0579-0.<br />

LINCY SV, Chandrashekar A, Narayan MS,<br />

Sharma R and Thakur RP. <strong>2010</strong>. Natural<br />

occurrence of trichothecene-producing Fusaria<br />

isolated from India with particular reference to<br />

sorghum. World Journal of Microbiology and<br />

Biotechnology DOI 10.1007/s11274-010-0542-0.<br />

130. 1280-9551 Zoosystema Randriamanantsoa R, Aberlenc HP, RALISOA<br />

OB, Ratnadass A and Vercambre B. <strong>2010</strong>. Les<br />

larves des Scarabaeoidea (Insecta, Coleoptera) en<br />

riziculture pluviale des régions de haute et<br />

moyenne altitudes du Centre de Madagascar.<br />

Zoosystema 32:19-72.<br />

382


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

131. 0256-0933 Crop<br />

Improvement<br />

Sandhu JS, Gupta SK and VEENA KHANNA.<br />

2009. Introgression of yield and component traits<br />

through wide hybridization in pigeonpea. Crop<br />

Improvement 36:50-54.<br />

132. 0011-183X Crop Science Keatinge JDH, Waliyar F, Jamnadass RH,<br />

Moustafa A, Andrade M, Drechsel P, Hughes J<br />

d’A, Palchamy Kardirvel and Luther K. 2009. Relearning<br />

old lessons for the future food: by bread<br />

alone no longer – Diversifying diets with fruit and<br />

vegetables. Crop Science 50:S-1–S-2 (<strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Science Forum Wageningen, Netherlands, 16-17<br />

June.<br />

133. 0019-5200 Indian Journal<br />

of Genetics and<br />

Plant Breeding<br />

134. 0253-4355 Indian Journal<br />

of Plant<br />

Protection<br />

135. 0567-7572 Journal of Food<br />

Legumes<br />

136. 1535-3893 Journal of<br />

Proteome<br />

Research<br />

Reddy BVS, Ramesh S, SANJANA REDDY P and<br />

Ashok Kumar A. 2009. Comparison of A 1 and A 2<br />

cytoplasmic male-sterility for combining ability in<br />

sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Indian<br />

Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 69(3):199-<br />

204 (published in <strong>2010</strong>).<br />

Pande S, SHARMA M, Neupane RK, Chaudhary<br />

RN, Rao, JN, Grzywacz D, Baurai VA and<br />

Stevenson P. 2009. Integrated crop management<br />

for improved chickpea production and its impact on<br />

the livelihood of farmers in Nepal. Indian Journal<br />

of Plant Protection 37(1&2): 139-146.<br />

http://hdl.handle.net/10731/2457 (Appeared in<br />

<strong>2010</strong>)<br />

Durairaj C, Sharma HC, KALAIMAGAL T and<br />

Ravikesavan R. 2009. A record on the insect pests<br />

of wild relatives of pigeonpea, mungbean and<br />

urdbean. Journal of Food Legumes 22:146-148.<br />

Sarkar A, Hess D, Mondal HA, Banerjee S,<br />

Sharma HC and DAS S. 2009. Homodimeric<br />

alkaline phosphatase located at Helicoverpa<br />

armigera midgut, a putative receptor of Cry1Ac<br />

contains #-GalNAc in terminal glycan structure as<br />

interactive epitope. Journal of Proteome Research<br />

8:1838-1848.<br />

137. 09737510 Journal of Pure<br />

and Applied<br />

Vijay Krishna Kumar K, Krishnam Raju S,<br />

Reddy MS, LAWRENCE KK, Groth DE, Miller<br />

383


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

Microbiology<br />

ME and Sudini H. 2009. Evaluation of<br />

commercially available PGPR for control of Rice<br />

sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Journal<br />

of Pure and Applied Microbiology 3(2):485-488.<br />

384


Non Thomson Index Journal Article<br />

SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

1. 0496-3490 Acta<br />

Agronomica<br />

Sinica<br />

2. 0496-3490 Acta<br />

Agronomica<br />

Sinica<br />

Hui-Fang J, Xiao-Ping R, Xiao-Jie Z, Jia-<br />

Quan H, Yong L, Li-Ying Y, Bo-Shou L,<br />

Upadhyaya HD and Holbrook CC. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Comparison of Genetic Diversity between Peanut<br />

Mini Core Collections from China and <strong>ICRISAT</strong><br />

by SSR Markers. Acta Agronomica Sinica<br />

36(7):1084−1091.<br />

JIANG HF, Ren XP, Wang SY, Zhang XJ,<br />

Huang JQ, BoShou L, Holbrook CC and<br />

Upadhyaya HD. <strong>2010</strong>. Development and<br />

evaluation of peanut germplasm with resistance<br />

to Aspergillus flavus from core collection. Acta<br />

Agronomica Sinica 36(3):428-434.<br />

3. Print:0971-<br />

3441,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-0279<br />

4. Print:0971-<br />

3441,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-0279<br />

5. Print:0971-<br />

3441,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-0279<br />

6. Print:0971-<br />

3441,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-0279<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Research<br />

Review<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Research<br />

Review<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Research<br />

Review<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Research<br />

Review<br />

Dikshit AK and Birthal PS. <strong>2010</strong>. India’s<br />

livestock feed demand: Estimates and<br />

projections. Agricultural Economics Research<br />

Review 23(1):15-28.<br />

Kiresur VR, Melinamani VP, Kulkarni VS,<br />

PUSHPA BHARATI and Yadav VS. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Agricultural Productivity, Rural Poverty and<br />

Nutritional Security: A Micro Evidence of Inter-<br />

Linkages from Karnataka State. Agricultural<br />

Economics Research Review 23(1):29-40.<br />

Lokesha H, Kiresur VR, Parthasarathy Rao P<br />

and BANTILAN MCS. <strong>2010</strong>. Value Chain<br />

Management in Production and Marketing of<br />

Groundnut in Raichur district of Karnataka.<br />

Agricultural Economics Research Review<br />

23:547.<br />

Reddy AA and GP Reddy. <strong>2010</strong>. Supply Side<br />

Constraints in Production of Pulses in India: Case<br />

Study of Lentils. Agricultural Economics<br />

Research Review 36:129-136.<br />

7. 0002-1679 Agricultural<br />

Situation in<br />

India<br />

Wani Suhas P, Singh Piara, Boomiraj K and<br />

Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate change and<br />

sustainable rainfed agriculture: Challenges and<br />

opportunities. Agricultural Situation in India<br />

66(5):221-239.<br />

385


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

8. Print:2151-<br />

7517,<br />

Online:<br />

2151-7525<br />

9. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:<br />

0974-181X<br />

10. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

11. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

12. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

13. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

Agriculture<br />

and biology<br />

Journal of<br />

North America<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

MUTURI PW, Mwololo JK, Munyiri SW,<br />

Rubaihayo P, Munyua JK, MGONJA M,<br />

Manyasa E and Kiarie N. <strong>2010</strong>. A perspective on<br />

proteomics: current applications, challenges and<br />

potential uses. Agriculture and biology Journal of<br />

North America 1:916-918.<br />

doi:10.5251/abjna.<strong>2010</strong>.1.5.916. 918.<br />

http://scihub.org/ABJNA/PDF/<strong>2010</strong>/5/ABJNA-1-<br />

5-916-918.pdf<br />

Anandan S, Khan AA, Ravi D and Blümmel M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. A Comparison of Two Complete Feed<br />

Blocks Based on Sorghum Stover of Two<br />

Different Cultivars on Weight Gain in Sheep and<br />

Economy of Feeding. Animal Nutrition and Feed<br />

Technology 10S:101-104.<br />

Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS, Blümmel M,<br />

Anandan S, Ramana Reddy Y , Ravinder Reddy<br />

Ch , Srinivasa Rao P and SANJANA REDDY P.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. On-farm evaluation of elite sweet sorghum<br />

genotypes for grain and stover yields and fodder<br />

quality. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology<br />

10S:69-78.<br />

Bidinger FR, Blümmel M, Hash CT and<br />

CHOUDHARY S. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic enhancement<br />

for superior food-feed traits in a pearl millet<br />

(Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) variety by<br />

recurrent selection. Animal Nutrition and Feed<br />

Technology 10S:49–56.<br />

Blümmel M, Khan AA, Vadez V, Hash CT and<br />

Rai KN. <strong>2010</strong>. Variability in stover quality traits<br />

in commercial hybrids of pearl millet<br />

(Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) and grain -<br />

stover trait relationships. Animal Nutrition and<br />

Feed Technology 10S:18-26.<br />

Parthasarathy Rao P and Blümmel M. <strong>2010</strong>. A<br />

Note on the Response of Sheep to Differently<br />

Priced Sorghum Stover Traded Concomitantly<br />

and Implications for the Economy of Feeding.<br />

Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 10S:105-<br />

111.<br />

386


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

14. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

15. Print:0972-<br />

2963,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-181X<br />

16. Print:0365-<br />

0340,<br />

Online:1476<br />

-3567<br />

17. Print:0365-<br />

0340,<br />

Online:1476<br />

-3567<br />

18. Print:1752-<br />

3818<br />

19. Print:0972-<br />

7566<br />

20. Print:1756-<br />

5529,<br />

Online:1756<br />

-5537<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Animal<br />

Nutrition and<br />

Feed<br />

Technology<br />

Archives of<br />

Agronomy and<br />

Soil Science<br />

Archives of<br />

Agronomy and<br />

Soil Science<br />

Asian &<br />

Australasian<br />

Journal of<br />

Plant Science<br />

and<br />

Biotechnology<br />

Asian<br />

Biotechnology<br />

and<br />

Development<br />

Review<br />

Climate and<br />

Development<br />

Ramkrishna Reddy Ch, Khan AA, Prasad KSVS,<br />

Ravi D, Reddy BVS, Rego T and Blümmel M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Stover Quality Traits for Improvement of<br />

Dual-Purpose Sorghum. Animal Nutrition and<br />

Feed Technology 10S:113-119.<br />

Ravi D, Anandan S, Khan AA, Bidinger FR,<br />

Nepolean T, Hash CT and Blümmel M. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Morphological, chemical and in vitro traits for<br />

prediction of stover quality in pearl millet for use<br />

in multidimensional crop improvement. Animal<br />

Nutrition and Feed Technology 10S:37–48.<br />

Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Nitrogen mineralization in<br />

lowland rice soils: The role of organic matter<br />

quantity and quality. Archives of Agronomy and<br />

Soil Science 56:337-353.<br />

Dungrani RA, Jat Ram A, Arvadia MK and<br />

Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Diversification of rice<br />

(Oryza sativa L.) based cropping systems for<br />

higher productivity, resource-use efficiency and<br />

economic returns in South Gujarat of India.<br />

Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. doi:<br />

10.1080/03650340.<strong>2010</strong>.533172.<br />

Bheema Lingeswara Reddy IN, Srinivas Reddy<br />

D, LAKSHMI NARASU M and<br />

Sivaramakrishnan S. <strong>2010</strong>. Development and<br />

Evaluation of SCAR Marker for Blast Resistance<br />

in Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn).<br />

Asian & Australasian Journal of Plant Science<br />

and Biotechnology 4(1):77-80.<br />

Curan AB, Dulloo E, Mathur P, BRAHMI P,<br />

Tyagi V, Tyagi RK and Upadhyaya HD. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Plant Genetic Resources and Germplasm Use in<br />

India. Asian Biotechnology and Development<br />

Review 12(3):17-34.<br />

MULA RP, Wani Suhas P, Rai KN and Balaji V.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Lessons from women’s participation in<br />

<strong>ICRISAT</strong> R4D projects: Talking points for<br />

climate change initiative. Climate and<br />

Development 2:378-389.<br />

387


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

21. Earthscan<br />

Climate and<br />

Development<br />

22. 0975-928X Electronic<br />

Journal of<br />

Plant Breeding<br />

23. 0975-928X Electronic<br />

Journal of<br />

Plant Breeding<br />

24. 0975-928X Electronic<br />

Journal of<br />

Plant Breeding<br />

Mula Rosana P, Wani Suhas P, Rai Kedar N and<br />

Balaji Venkataraman. <strong>2010</strong>. Lessons from<br />

women's participation in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> R4D projects:<br />

Talking points for climate change initiatives.<br />

Earthscan Climate and Development 2(4):378-<br />

389.<br />

Saxena KB and Nadarajan N. <strong>2010</strong>. Prospects<br />

of pigeonpea hybrids in Indian agriculture.<br />

Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1:1107-<br />

1117.<br />

Upadhyaya HD, Yadav D, Dronavalli N, Gowda<br />

CLL and Singh S. <strong>2010</strong>. Mini core germplasm<br />

collections for infusing genetic diversity in plant<br />

breeding programs. Lead paper presented in:<br />

Third National Congress on "Plant Breeding and<br />

Genomics”, 7-9 July <strong>2010</strong>, TNAU, Coimbatore,<br />

India. P 9. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding<br />

1(4):1294-1309<br />

https://sites.google.com/site/ispbtnau/publications).<br />

Vindhiyavarman P, Manivannan N, Nigam SN<br />

and Muralidharan V. <strong>2010</strong>. Farmers'<br />

participatory varietal selection in groundnut: A<br />

case study from Tamil Nadu, India. Electronic<br />

Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4):878-881.<br />

25. Green Farming Mula MG, Saxena KB, Kumar RV and Rathore<br />

A. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of spacing and irrigation on seed<br />

production of a CMS-based pigeonpea hybrid.<br />

Green Farming 1(3):221-227.<br />

26. Green Farming Mula MG, Saxena KB, Kumar RV, MULA RP<br />

and Rathore A. <strong>2010</strong>. Response of spacing on<br />

yield and returns of CMS-based mediumduration<br />

pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) hybrid.<br />

Green Farming 1(4):331-335.<br />

27. Print<br />

ISSN:0019-<br />

4662<br />

Indian<br />

Economic<br />

Journal<br />

Reddy AA. <strong>2010</strong>. Disparities in Agricultural<br />

Productivity Growth in Andhra Pradesh. Indian<br />

Economic Journal 58(1):134-152.<br />

28. 0019-5014 Indian Journal<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Parthasarathy Rao P. <strong>2010</strong>. Rapporteurs’s report<br />

on Conservation Agriculture. Indian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Economics 65(3):602-607.<br />

388


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

29. 0019-5014 Indian Journal<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

Singh NP, Ranjit Kumar, Singh RP, ALKA<br />

SINGH , Padaria RN and NISHA<br />

VARGHESE. <strong>2010</strong>. Farm- level impacts and<br />

determinants of labour-out migration in Indo<br />

Gangetic Plains of India”. Indian Journal of<br />

Agricultural Economics 65(1):72-86.<br />

30. Print<br />

ISSN:0537-<br />

197X,<br />

eISSN:0974<br />

-4460<br />

31. Print ISSN<br />

:0973-1822<br />

32. Print ISSN<br />

:0971-8184<br />

33. Print: 1459-<br />

0255,<br />

Online:<br />

1459-0263<br />

Indian Journal<br />

of Agronomy<br />

Indian Journal<br />

of Fertilizers<br />

Indian Journal<br />

of Plant<br />

Genetic<br />

Resources<br />

International<br />

Journal of<br />

Food,<br />

Agriculture<br />

and<br />

Environment<br />

Jat Ram A and Ahlawat IPS. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of<br />

organic manure and sulphur fertilization in<br />

pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) groundnut (Arachis<br />

hypogaea) intercropping system. Indian Journal<br />

of Agronomy 55 (4): 24-29.<br />

Srinivasarao Ch, Wani Suhas P, Sahrawat KL,<br />

Krishnappa K and Rajasekhara Rao BK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Effect of balanced nutrition on yield and<br />

economics of vegetable crop in participatory<br />

watersheds in Karnataka. Indian Journal of<br />

Fertilizers 6(3):39-42.<br />

REDDY PS, Reddy BVS, Ashok Kumar A,<br />

Ramesh S, Sahrawat KL and Rao PV. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Association of grain Fe and Zn contents with<br />

agronomic traits in sorghum. Indian Journal of<br />

Plant Genetic Resources 23:280-284.<br />

TOJO SOLER C, Hoogenboom G, Olatinwo R,<br />

Diarra B, Waliyar F and Traoré S. <strong>2010</strong>. Peanut<br />

contamination by Aspergillus flavus and<br />

aflatoxin B1 in granaries of villages and markets<br />

of Mali, West Africa. International Journal of<br />

Food, Agriculture and Environment 8(1):195-<br />

203.<br />

34. 1816-4978 International<br />

Journal of Soil<br />

Science<br />

35. Journal de<br />

l’Association<br />

des Botanistes<br />

de l’Afrique de<br />

l’Ouest<br />

Rajashekhara Rao BK, Sahrawat KL, Wani SP<br />

and Pardhasaradhi G. <strong>2010</strong>. Integrated nutrient<br />

management to enhance on-farm productivity of<br />

rain fed maize in India. International Journal of<br />

Soil Science 5:216-225.<br />

Bakasso Y, Saadou M, Mahamane A, Zongo J-<br />

D and Zaman-Allah M. <strong>2010</strong>. Geographical<br />

distribution and utilization of Roselle (Hibiscus<br />

sabdariffa L.) in Niger. Journal de l’Association<br />

des Botanistes de l’Afrique de l’Ouest 6:23-33.<br />

389


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

36. Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Development<br />

and Policy<br />

37. 0019-5014 Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

38. 0019-5014 Journal of<br />

Agricultural<br />

Economics<br />

39. 0972-1665 Journal of<br />

Agro-<br />

Meterology<br />

40. 0972-1665 Journal of<br />

Agro-<br />

Meterology<br />

41. 0974-7230 Journal of<br />

Computer<br />

Science and<br />

System<br />

Biology<br />

42. Journal of<br />

Environmental<br />

Research<br />

43. Journal of<br />

Food and<br />

Environment<br />

Kumara Charyulu D and Rao KPC. <strong>2010</strong>. Drivers<br />

of crop diversification in Semi-Arid Tropics<br />

(SAT) of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of<br />

Agricultural Development and Policy. 20(1):38-<br />

46.<br />

Birthal PS. <strong>2010</strong>. Unlocking the potential of<br />

agriculture in north-eastern hill region of India.<br />

Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics<br />

65(3):329-343.<br />

Chand Ramesh, Raju SS and Pandey LM. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Effect of global recession on Indian agriculture.<br />

Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics<br />

65(3):487–496.<br />

Manikandan N, Rao GGSN, Rao AVMS, Rao<br />

VUM and Satyanarayana T. <strong>2010</strong>. Variations in<br />

moisture regime at selected stations over India.<br />

Journal of Agro-Meterology 11(special<br />

issue):200-203.<br />

Rao VUM, Manikandan N, Singh NP,<br />

BANTILAN MCS, Satyanarayana T, Rao<br />

AVMS and Rao GGSN. <strong>2010</strong>. Trends of heavy<br />

rainfall events in Anantpur and Mahabubnagar<br />

districts of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Agro-<br />

Meterology 11(special issue):195-199.<br />

Thakur V and Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Challenges<br />

and strategies for next generation sequencing<br />

(NGS) data analysis. Journal of Computer<br />

Science and System Biology 3:040-042.<br />

SIREESHA K, Sridhar Kumar Ch, Ranga Rao<br />

GV, Arjuna Rao P and Lava Kumar P. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Effect of different storage conditions on the<br />

virulence of Helicoverpa armigera<br />

nucleopolyhedrovirus (HaNPV). Journal of<br />

Environmental Research 34(1):65-69.<br />

Cecilia M, Tojo Soler, Gerrit Hoogenboom,<br />

Rabiu Olatinwo, Bamory Diarra, Farid<br />

Waliyar and Sibiry Traore. <strong>2010</strong>. Peanut<br />

contamination by Aspergillus flavus and aflatoxin<br />

B1 in granaries of villages and markets of Mali.<br />

West Africa. Journal of Food and Environment<br />

390


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

8(2):195-203.<br />

44. Print:0970-<br />

6380,<br />

Online:<br />

0976-2434<br />

45. Print:0970-<br />

6380,<br />

Online:<br />

0976-2434<br />

46. Print:0970-<br />

6380,<br />

Online:0976<br />

-2434<br />

Journal of<br />

Food Legumes<br />

Journal of<br />

Food Legumes<br />

Journal of Food<br />

Legumes<br />

Kashiwagi J, Upadhyaya HD and Krishnamurthy<br />

L. <strong>2010</strong>. Significance and genetic diversity of<br />

SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) in the<br />

chickpea germplasm in the semi-arid<br />

environments. Journal of Food Legumes 23:99-<br />

105.<br />

KUMARI AD, Sharma HC and Jagdishwar<br />

Reddy D. <strong>2010</strong>. Incorporation of lyophilized<br />

leaves and pods into artificial diet to assess<br />

antibiosis component of resistance to pod borer<br />

in pigeonpea. Journal of Food Legumes 23(1):57-<br />

65.<br />

Saxena KB, Kumar RV and Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Vegetable pigeonpea – a review. Journal of Food<br />

Legumes 23(2):91-98.<br />

47. 0019-6363 Journal of<br />

Indian Society<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Statistics<br />

48. 0019-6363 Journal of<br />

Indian Society<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Statistics<br />

49. 1226-8550 Journal of<br />

International<br />

and Area<br />

Studies<br />

Sarkar A, Parsad R, Gupta VK and Rathore A.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Efficient Row-Column Designs for<br />

Microarray Experiments. Journal of Indian<br />

Society of Agricultural Statistics 64(1):89-117.<br />

Singh KN, Rathore A, Tripathi AK, Rao AS<br />

and Khan S. <strong>2010</strong>. Soil fertility mapping and its<br />

validation using spatial prediction techniques.<br />

Journal of Indian Society of Agricultural<br />

Statistics 64(3):359-365.<br />

Elumalai K and Birthal PS. <strong>2010</strong>. Effect of trade<br />

liberalization on the efficiency of Indian Dairy<br />

Industry. Journal of International and Area<br />

Studies 17(1):1-15.<br />

50. Print ISSN:<br />

1531-0353,<br />

eISSN:1531<br />

-0361<br />

Journal of<br />

Irrigation and<br />

Drainage<br />

Woltering L, Pasternak D and Ndjeunga J. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

The African Market Garden: The Development<br />

of a Low Pressure Drip Irrigation System for<br />

Smallholders in the Sudano-Sahel. Journal of<br />

Irrigation and Drainage.<br />

51. 0970-2776 Journal of<br />

Oilseeds<br />

Research<br />

Ashok Kumar A, JANILA P, SUJATHA M and<br />

HEMALATHA V. <strong>2010</strong>. Inheritance studies on<br />

morphological traits in Castor (Ricinus communis<br />

L.). Journal of Oilseeds Research 26:98-101.<br />

391


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

52. 2006-9758 Journal of<br />

Plant Breeding<br />

and Crop<br />

Science<br />

Li Y, Bhosale S, HAUSMANN BIG, Stich B,<br />

Melchinger AE and Parzies HK. <strong>2010</strong>. Genetic<br />

diversity and linkage disequilibrium of two<br />

homologous genes to maize D8: Sorghum SbD8<br />

and pearl millet PgD8. Journal of Plant Breeding<br />

and Crop Science 2:117-128. online at:<br />

http://www.academicjournals.org/jpbcs/PDF/pdf<br />

%20<strong>2010</strong>/May/Li%20et%20al..pdf<br />

53. Print:0019-<br />

638X,<br />

Online:0974<br />

-0228<br />

54. Print:0019-<br />

638X,<br />

Online:<br />

0974-0228<br />

55. Print:0971-<br />

636X,<br />

Online:0973<br />

-5399<br />

56. Print:0971-<br />

7811,<br />

eISSN:<br />

0974-1275<br />

Journal of the<br />

Indian Society<br />

of Soil Science<br />

Journal of the<br />

Indian Society<br />

of Soil Science<br />

Journal of<br />

Tropical<br />

Agriculture<br />

Journal Plant<br />

Biochemistry<br />

and<br />

Biotechnology<br />

Chander G, Verma TS and SHEETAL<br />

SHARMA. <strong>2010</strong>. Nutrient contents in<br />

cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis)<br />

as influenced by boron and farm yard manure in<br />

North Western Himalayan alfisols. Journal of the<br />

Indian Society of Soil Science 58(2):248-251.<br />

http://discover-decouvrir.cisti-icist.nrccnrc.gc.ca/dcvr/ctrl?action=shwart&aix=3&aid=<br />

16077154<br />

SHIRISHA K, Sahrawat KL, Murthy KVS, Wani<br />

Suhas P, Gajbhiye PN and Kundu S. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Comparative evaluation of ICP-AES and<br />

turbidimetric methods for determining<br />

extractable sulfur in soils. Journal of the Indian<br />

Society of Soil Science 58: 323-326.<br />

Sharma S, Chander G and Verma TS. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Soil microbiological and chemical changes in<br />

rice-wheat cropping system at Palampur<br />

(Himachal Pradesh) after twelve years of<br />

Lantana camara L. residue incorporation.<br />

Journal of Tropical Agriculture<br />

48(1-2):64-67.<br />

Mahendar T, REVATHI M, Wani Suhas P,<br />

LEELA T, David A Hoisington and Rajeev K<br />

Varshney. <strong>2010</strong>. Analysis of Genetic Diversity<br />

in Pongamia [Pongamia pinnata (L) Pierre]<br />

using AFLP Markers. Journal Plant Biochemistry<br />

and Biotechnology 19(2):209-216.<br />

57. 1569-8424 LEISA INDIA Ravinder Reddy Ch, Parthasarathy Rao P,<br />

Birajdar D, Alur AS, Rajasekhar Reddy A,<br />

Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS and Gowda CLL.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Linking small-scale sorghum and pearl<br />

Millet farmers to credit institutions- a case study.<br />

LEISA INDIA 12:4.<br />

392


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

58. Midlands State<br />

University<br />

Journal of<br />

Science,<br />

Agriculture<br />

and<br />

Technology<br />

59. 0027-8424 National<br />

Academy of<br />

Sciences<br />

60. 0730-2207 Plant Breeding<br />

Review<br />

61. 0730-2207 Plant Breeding<br />

Reviews<br />

62. Plant Genetic<br />

Resources<br />

Nyamangara J and Makumire TB. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Nitrogen mineralization from fresh and<br />

composted animal manures applied to a sandy<br />

soil. Midlands Status University Journal of<br />

Science, Agriculture and Technology 2(1):25-34.<br />

Midlands State University, Zimbabwe.<br />

LU Y, Zhang S, Shah T, Xie C, HAO Z, Li X,<br />

Farkhari M, Ribaut JM, Cao M, Rong T and<br />

Xu Y. <strong>2010</strong>. Joint linkage–linkage disequilibrium<br />

mapping is a powerful approach to detecting<br />

quantitative trait loci underlying drought<br />

tolerance in maize. <strong>2010</strong>. National Academy of<br />

Sciences, USA PNAS 107:19585-19590.<br />

Varshney RK, Thudi M, May GD and Jackson<br />

SA. <strong>2010</strong>. Legume genomics and breeding. Plant<br />

Breeding Review 33:257-304.<br />

Dwivedi SL, Upadhyaya HD, Subudhi P,<br />

Gehring C, Bajic V and Ortiz R. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in cereals<br />

through breeding and transgenic interventions.<br />

Plant Breeding Reviews 33:31-114.<br />

MURAYA MM, Geiger HH, MUTEGI E,<br />

Kanyenji BM, Sagnard S, DE VILLIERS S,<br />

Kiambi D and Parzies HK. <strong>2010</strong>. Geographical<br />

patterns of phenotypic diversity and structure of<br />

Kenyan wild sorghum populations (Sorghum<br />

spp) as an aid to germplasm collection and<br />

conservation strategy. Plant Genetic Resources<br />

8:217-224. doi:10.1017/S1479262110000225.<br />

63. Plant Soil DEVI JM, Sinclair TR and Vadez V. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Genotypic variability among peanut (Arachis<br />

hypogea L.) in sensitivity of nitrogen fixation to<br />

soil drying. Plant Soil 330:139-148.<br />

64. Print ISSN:<br />

1749-0359<br />

Plant Stress<br />

Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Reducing iron toxicity in<br />

lowland rice with tolerant genotypes and plant<br />

nutrition. Plant Stress 4(Special Issue 2):70-75.<br />

65. 1578-4460 Regional and<br />

Sectoral<br />

Economic<br />

Studies<br />

Reddy AA. <strong>2010</strong>. Regional Disparities in Food<br />

Habits and Nutritional Intake in Andhar Pradesh,<br />

India Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies<br />

10(2):125-134.<br />

393


SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

66. Earth and<br />

Environmental<br />

Science<br />

67. 0012-9976 Economic and<br />

Political<br />

Weekly<br />

68. 0012-9976 Economic and<br />

Political<br />

Weekly<br />

69. 0971-8664 Indian Journal<br />

of Agricultural<br />

Marketing<br />

70. 0004-4555 The Asian<br />

Economic<br />

Review<br />

Karen Garrett, Forbes G, Pande S, Savary<br />

S, Sparks A, Valdivia C, Vera Cruz C and<br />

Willocquet L. 2009. Anticipating and<br />

responding to biological complexity in the<br />

effects of climate change on agriculture. IOP<br />

Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental<br />

Science 6 (2009).<br />

http://iopscience.iop.org/1755-<br />

1315/6/37/372007<br />

Reddy AA. 2009. Pulses Production<br />

technology: Status and way forward.<br />

Economic & Political Weekly, December 26,<br />

2009-1 January <strong>2010</strong> 52:73-80.<br />

Reddy AA. 2009. Policy Options for India’s<br />

Edible Oil Complex. Economic and Political<br />

Weekly, 10-17, October 2009, 41:22-24.<br />

Parthasarathy Rao P and Birthal PS. 2009.<br />

Marketing of agricultural produce in rainfed<br />

regions of India: Emerging scenario. Indian<br />

Journal of Agricultural Marketing 23(3):125-<br />

139.<br />

Kumara Charyulu D and Rao KPC. 2009.<br />

Risk Attitudes of farmers in Mahabubnagar<br />

district of Andhra Pradesh and their<br />

determinants. The Asian Economic Review<br />

51(1):79-89.<br />

394


E-SAT Journal Articles<br />

SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal Article<br />

1. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

2. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

3. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

4. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

5. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS, Ravinder<br />

Reddy CH, Blummel M, Srinivasa Rao P,<br />

Ramaiah B and SANJANA REDDY P.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Enhancing the harvest window for<br />

supply chain management of sweet<br />

sorghum for ethanol production. E-Journal<br />

of SAT Agricultural Research. 8:1-5.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorghu<br />

m_Millets/Enhancing_the.pdf.<br />

Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS, Sahrawat<br />

KL and Ramaiah B. <strong>2010</strong>. Combating<br />

micronutrient malnutrition: Identification<br />

of commercial sorghum cultivars with<br />

high grain iron and zinc. E-Journal of SAT<br />

Agricultural Research. 8: 1-5.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorghu<br />

m_Millets/Combating_micronutrient.pdf<br />

Basavaraj G, Parthasarathy Rao P,<br />

BHAGAVATULA S and Ahmed W.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Availability and utilization of<br />

pearl millet in India. E-Journal of SAT<br />

Agricultural Research. 8:1-6<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume8/IMPI/<br />

Availability_and_utilization.pdf<br />

Gupta SK, Rai KN and Suresh Kumar M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Effect of genetic background on<br />

fertility restoration of pearl millet hybrids<br />

based on three diverse cytoplasmicnuclear<br />

male-sterility systems. E-Journal<br />

of SAT Agricultural Research. 8: 1-4.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorgh<br />

um_Millets/Effect_of_genetic.pdf<br />

Meena HP, Kumar J, Upadhyaya HD,<br />

Bharadwaj C, Chauhan SK, Verma<br />

AK and Rizvi AH. <strong>2010</strong>. Chickpea<br />

(Cicer arietinum L.) mini core<br />

germplasm collection as rich sources of<br />

diversity for crop improvement. E-<br />

Journal of SAT Agricultural Research.<br />

8:1-5.<br />

395


E-SAT Journal Articles<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume8/Chick<br />

pea_pigeonpea/Chickpea_mini_core.pdf<br />

6. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

7. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

8. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

9. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

10. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

MULA RP, Rai KN and Yadav SK.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Case study of adoption of a pearl<br />

millet variety in a non-target region. E-<br />

Journal of SAT Agricultural Research. 8:<br />

1-5.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorgh<br />

um_Millets/Case_study_of.pdf<br />

Parthasarathy Rao P, Basavaraj G,<br />

Ahmad W and BHAGAVATULA S.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. An analysis of availability and<br />

utilization of sorghum grain in India. E-<br />

Journal of SAT Agricultural Research.<br />

8:1-8.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume8/IMPI/<br />

An_analysis_sorghum.pdf<br />

Reddy BVS, Ashok Kumar A, SANJANA<br />

REDDY P, Ibrahim M, Ramaiah B,<br />

Dakheel AJ, Ramesh S and<br />

Krishnamurthy L . <strong>2010</strong>. Cultivar options<br />

for salinity tolerance in sorghum. E-<br />

Journal of SAT Agricultural Research. 8:<br />

1-5.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorghu<br />

m_Millets/Cultivar_options.pdf<br />

Reddy BVS, Sharma HC, Thakur RP and<br />

Ashok Kumar A. <strong>2010</strong>. Characterization<br />

of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Bred Sorghum Restorer<br />

lines. E-Journal of SAT Agricultural<br />

Research. 8: 1-9.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume8/Sorghu<br />

m_Millets/Characterization_of_.pdf<br />

Swamy SVSG, Sharma HC, Kumar CS,<br />

Sharma KK and Subbaratnam GV. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Use of indices based on consumption and<br />

utilization of food as a criterion to<br />

evaluate putative transgenic pigeonpea<br />

plants for resistance to pod borer<br />

Helicoverpa armigera. E-Journal of SAT<br />

Agricultural Research. 8:1-7.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/Volume8/Chick<br />

pea_pigeonpea/Use_of_indices.pdf<br />

396


E-SAT Journal Articles<br />

11. 3973-3094 E-Journal of<br />

SAT<br />

Agricultural<br />

Research<br />

Thakur RP, Sharma R, Srinivasa Rao P,<br />

SANJANA REDDY P, Rao VP and<br />

Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation of sweet<br />

sorghum hybrid parents for resistance to<br />

grain mold, anthracnose, leaf blight and<br />

downy mildew. E-Journal of SAT<br />

Agricultural Research. 8:1-5.<br />

http://ejournal.icrisat.org/volume8/Sorgh<br />

um_Millets/Evaluation_of_sweet.pdf<br />

397


Book Chapters<br />

1. Anantha KH. <strong>2010</strong>. Distressed livelihoods: Groundwater Depletion and Coping<br />

Strategies of Farming Communities in Hard Rock Areas of Karnataka. Pages ____<br />

in Ecological economics: An approach towards socioeconomic and environmental<br />

sustainability (Sunil Nautiyal and Bibhu Prasad Nayak, eds.). Institute for Social<br />

and Economic Change (ISEC), Bangalore and National Institute of Ecology (NIE),<br />

Jaipur/Delhi.<br />

2. BHATNAGAR-MATHUR P, Rao S, Vadez V and Sharma KK. <strong>2010</strong>. Transgenic<br />

strategies for improved drought tolerance in legumes of Semi-Arid Tropics. Pages<br />

261-279 in Water and Agricultural Sustainability Strategies (Manjit S Kang, ed.).<br />

CRC Press Taylor and Francis, UK.<br />

3. Byjesh K, Kumar SN and Aggarwal PK. <strong>2010</strong>. Simulating impacts, potential<br />

adaptation and vulnerability of maize to climate change in India. Pages 413-431 in<br />

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. Springer Publication:<br />

ISSN-1381-2386.<br />

4. Chand Ramesh, Pandey LM and Garg S. <strong>2010</strong>. Rise and decline of rainfed agriculture.<br />

Pages ___ in Rainfed agriculture in India: perspective and challenges, (Singh Surjeet and<br />

Rathore MS, eds.). Rawat Publications, Jaipur. ISBN 81-316-0311-3 (Print)<br />

www.rawatbooks.com/book_detail.aspx?category_id=49<br />

5. Deshpande S, Srinivasa Rao P, Hash CT and Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong> Genomics and<br />

bioengineering of lignin biosynthetic pathway genes. Pages 37-58 in Brown<br />

midrib sorghum—current status and potential as novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock<br />

of bioenergy (Rao PS, Pralashma RS and Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert<br />

academic publishing Gmbh and Co KG, Germany.<br />

6. Gowda CLL, Pasternak D, Kumar S, Nikiema A and Woltering L. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop<br />

diversification with horticultural crops for enhancing income and improving<br />

livelihoods of farmers in dryland areas. Pages 269-279 in Horticulture and<br />

Livelihoods Security (Nath Prem and Gaddagimath PB, eds.). Scientific Publishers<br />

(India), Jodhpur, India.<br />

7. Hossain M and Deb U. <strong>2010</strong>. Volatility in rice prices and policy responses in<br />

Bangladesh. Pages 91-108 in The Rice Crisis: Markets, Policies and Food Security<br />

(Dawe D, ed.). London and Washington, D.C.: Earthscan.<br />

8. Pande S, Narayana Rao J, SHARMA M, Pathak M and Stevenson P. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Mass-screening techniques for early selection of disease resistance in chickpea.<br />

Pages 201-234 in Mass Screening Techniques for Early Selection of Disease<br />

Resistance in Neglected Crops: A critical Appraisal (Manoela Miranda, Springer<br />

and Verlag, eds.). International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).<br />

398


9. Pande S, SHARMA M and Narayana Rao J. <strong>2010</strong>. Botrytis Gray Mold. Pages 42-<br />

45 in Compendium of Chickpea and Lentil Diseases and Pests (Weidong Chen,<br />

Sharma HC and Fred J Muehlbauer, eds.). The American Phytopathological<br />

Society (APS PRESS). ISBN 978-0-89054-383-2. 165pp.<br />

10. Prakasham RS, Srinivasa Rao P, Sudheer Kumar Y, Sreenivas Rao R,<br />

Deshpande S, Hobbs P, Umakanth AV and Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong>. Introduction to<br />

bmrs. Pages 74-95 in Brown midrib sorghum—current status and potential as<br />

novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock of bioenergy (Srinivasa Rao, Pralashma RS and<br />

Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert academic publishing Gmbh and Co KG,<br />

Germany.<br />

11. Rajasekhar D, Gagan Bihari Sahu and Anantha KH. <strong>2010</strong>. Growing Rural-<br />

Urban Disparity in Karnataka. Serials Publishers, New Delhi. April <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

12. Ranga Rao GV. <strong>2010</strong>. Identification, distribution and management of thrips on<br />

lentil. Pages 124-25 in Compendium of Chickpea and Lentil Diseases and Pests<br />

CABI. (Weidong Chen, Hari C Sharma and Fred J Muehlbauer, eds.), APS press,<br />

St. Paul, USA, 165pp.<br />

13. Rao KV, Venkateswarlu B, Sahrawat KL, Wani Suhas P, Mishra PK, Dixit S,<br />

Srinivasa Reddy K, Manoranjan Kumar and Saikia US. eds. <strong>2010</strong>. Proceedings of<br />

National Workshop-cum-Brain Storming on Rainwater Harvesting and Reuse<br />

through Farm Ponds: Experiences, Issues and Strategies. 21-22 April 2009.<br />

CRIDA, Hyderabad. 242pp.<br />

14. Sharma HC, Dhillon MK, BHATNAGAR-MATHUR P and Sharma KK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Potential of transgenic grain legumes for management and sustainable crop<br />

production. Pages 135-158 in Pests and Pathogens: Management Strategies<br />

(Dashavantha Reddy Vudem, Nagaraja Rao Poduri and Venkateswara Rao<br />

Khareedu, eds.). BS Publications. ISBN: 978-81-7800-227-9.<br />

15. Sharma HC, Gowda CLL, Ranga Rao GV, Dhillon MK, and El Bouhssini M.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Pest Management in chickpea. Pages 150-152 in Compendium of Chickpea<br />

and Lentil Diseases and Pests CABI. (Weidong Chen, Hari C Sharma and Fred J<br />

Muehlbauer, eds.), APS press, St. Paul, USA. 165 pp.<br />

16. Sharma HC, Srivastava CP, Durairaj C and Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>. Pest<br />

management in grain legumes and climate change. Pages 115-139 in Climate<br />

change and management of cool season grain legume crops (Yadav SS et al., eds.).<br />

Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media.<br />

17. Singh Piara, Pathak P, Wani Suhas P and Sahrawat KL. <strong>2010</strong>. Integrated<br />

watershed management for increasing productivity and water-use efficiency in<br />

semi-arid tropical India. Pages 181-205 in Water and Agricultural Sustainability<br />

Strategies (Kang MS, ed.). CRC Press/Balkema, Taylor and Francis Group, 2300<br />

AK Leiden, the Netherlands.<br />

18. Srinivasa Rao P, Deshpande S, Prakasham RS and Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong><br />

Composition and characterization of bmr sorghums. Pages 9-36 in Brown midrib<br />

399


sorghum—current status and potential as novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock of<br />

bioenergy (Srinivasa Rao, Pralashma RS and Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert<br />

academic publishing Gmbh and Co KG, Germany.<br />

19. Srinivasa Rao P, Prakasham RS, Umakanth AV, Deshpande S, Ravikumar S and<br />

Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong>. Introduction. Pages 1-7 in Brown midrib sorghum—current<br />

status and potential as novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock of bioenergy (Srinivasa<br />

Rao, Pralashma RS and Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert academic publishing<br />

Gmbh and Co KG, Germany.<br />

20. Srinivasa Rao P, Ravikumar S, Prakasham RS, Deshpande S and Reddy BVS.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Bmr – from efficient fodder trait to novel substrate for futuristic biofuel:<br />

Way forward. Pages 99-112 in Brown midrib sorghum—current status and<br />

potential as novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock of bioenergy (Srinivasa Rao,<br />

Pralashma RS and Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert academic publishing Gmbh<br />

and Co KG, Germany.<br />

21. Umakanth AV, Srinivasa Rao P, Prakasham RS and Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong>. Brown<br />

midrib sorghums use in dairy industry. Pages 59-73 in Brown midrib sorghum—<br />

current status and potential as novel ligno-cellulosic feedstock of bioenergy<br />

(Srinivasa Rao, Pralashma RS and Deshpande S, eds.). Lap Lambert academic<br />

publishing Gmbh and Co KG, Germany.<br />

22. Upadhyaya HD, Kashiwagi J, Varshney RK, Gaur PM, Saxena KB,<br />

Krishnamurthy L, Gowda CLL, Pundir RPS, Chaturvedi SK, Basu PS and Singh<br />

IP. <strong>2010</strong>. Phenotyping chickpeas and pigeonpeas for adaptation to drought. Pages<br />

347-355 in Drought phenotyping in crops: from theory to practice (Philippe<br />

Monneveux and Jean-Marcel Ribaut, eds.). Generation Challenge Programme.<br />

23. Varshney RK, PAZHAMALA L, Kashiwagi J, Gaur PM, Krishnamurthy L and<br />

Hoisington DA. <strong>2010</strong>. Genomics and physiological approaches for root trait<br />

breeding to improve drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Pages<br />

233-250 in Root Genomics (de Oliveira AD and Varshney RK, eds.), Springer,<br />

Germany.<br />

24. Varshney RK. <strong>2010</strong>. Gene-based marker systems in plants: high throughput<br />

approaches for discovery and genotyping. Pages 119-142 in Molecular Techniques<br />

in Crop Improvement, Vol II, (Jain SM and Brar DS, eds.), Springer, The<br />

Netherlands.<br />

25. Vara Prasad PV, Vijaya Gopal K and Upadhyaya HD. 2009. Growth and<br />

Production of Groundnut, in Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production. Pages 26 in<br />

Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices<br />

of the UNESCO (Willy H Verheye, ed.). Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK,<br />

[http://www.eolss.net] [Retrieved February 19, 2011].<br />

400


Books and Journal Volumes<br />

1. Ajeigbe HA and Dashiell K. <strong>2010</strong>. Participatory research extension approach:<br />

N2Africa extension method. 39pp. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Based on: Ellis-<br />

Jones J, Schulz S, Chikoye D, De Haan N, Kormawa P and Adezwa D. 2005.<br />

Participatory research and extension approaches: a guide for researchers and<br />

extension workers for involving farmers in research and development. IITA,<br />

Ibadan, Nigeria, and Silsoe Research Institute, UK. 52pp.<br />

2. Ajeigbe HA, Singh BB, Musa A, Adeosun JO, Adamu RS and Chikoye D.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Improved cowpea-cereal cropping systems: cereal-double cowpea<br />

system for northern Guinea savanna Zone. International Institute of Tropical<br />

Agriculture, Ibadan Nigeria. 17 pp.<br />

3. Ajeigbe HA and Woomer PL. <strong>2010</strong>. Biological Nitrogen Fixation and Grain<br />

Legume Enterprise: Guidelines for N2Africa Lead Farmers. Tropical Soil<br />

Biology and Fertility Institute of the International Centre for Tropical<br />

Agriculture. Nairobi/International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan<br />

Nigeria. 21 pp.<br />

4. Birthal PS, Parthasarathy P, Nigam SN, BANTILAN MCS and<br />

BHAGAVATULA S. <strong>2010</strong>. Groundnut and Soybean Economies in Asia:<br />

Facts, Trends and Outlook. Book no. 50 (BOE 050), Patancheru 502 324,<br />

Andhra Pradesh, India: <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. 92 pp. ISBN: 978-92-9066-531-1.<br />

5. Dwivedi SL, Perotti E, Upadhyaya HD and Ortiz R. <strong>2010</strong>. Sexual and asexual<br />

(apomixis) plant reproduction in the genopmics era: Opportunities to increase<br />

food production. Sexual Plant Reproduction. DOI 10.1007/s00497-010-0144-x.<br />

ISSN 0934-0882 (Print) 1432-2145 (Online May 27, <strong>2010</strong>)<br />

6. Gujja B, Hash Jr CT, Sharma MM, TAMPAL F and Maqsood Javed SM.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Biodiversity @ <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-Patancheru, India (Version 2.0). International<br />

Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>) and World<br />

Wide Fund for Nature (WWF): Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India. 386 + ix<br />

pp, and fold-out map.<br />

7. Mula MG and Saxena KB. <strong>2010</strong>. Lifting the level of awareness on pigeonpea:<br />

A global perspective. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid<br />

Tropics, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India. ISBN: 978-92-9066-<br />

535-9. Order code. BOE 051. 540pp.<br />

8. Parthasarathy Rao P, Birthal PS, BANTILAN MCS and BHAGAVATULA S.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Chickpea and pigeon economies of Asia. Facts, trends and outlook.<br />

International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (<strong>ICRISAT</strong>),<br />

Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India. 76 pp.<br />

9. Ravinder Reddy Ch, Nigam SN, Parthasarathy Rao P, Ahmed S, Ratnakar R,<br />

Raidu DV, Alur AS, Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS and Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Village Seed Banks: An integrated seed system for improved seed production<br />

and supply – A case study. Information Bulletin No.87, International Crops<br />

401


Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics Patancheru, 502 324, Andhra<br />

Pradesh, India. 40pp.<br />

10. Rai KN, Gupta SK, BHATACHARJEE RANJANA, Kulkarni VN, Singh AK<br />

and Rao AS. eds. 2009. Morphological Characteristics of <strong>ICRISAT</strong>-bred<br />

Pearl Millet Hybrid Seed Parents. Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India:<br />

International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 176pp.<br />

http://www.icrisat.org/what‐we‐do/publications/digital‐publications/icrisatpublications‐<strong>2010</strong>/morphological‐pearlmillet.pdf<br />

402


Conference Papers<br />

1. Birthal PS. <strong>2010</strong>. Contract farming in livestock: Some reflections on the conditions<br />

for success. Pages 116-125 in Indian Dairying-productivity and food safety.<br />

Proceedings of the 38 th Dairy Industry Conference. Indian Dairy Association<br />

(south Zone) Bengaluru, India. February 17-19, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.<br />

2. Birthal PS and A Kumar. <strong>2010</strong>. Improving efficiency of milk markets through<br />

institutional innovations for the benefit of smallholders. Volume 1, Pages 342-351<br />

(Lead Papers) in Optimizing buffalo productivity through conventional and novel<br />

technologies. Proceedings of the International Buffalo Conference, 1-4 February,<br />

New Delhi, India.<br />

3. Chander G, Wani Suhas P, Sahrawat KL and Mathur TP. <strong>2010</strong>. Water use<br />

efficiency enhanced through balanced nutrient management—A case study from<br />

Rajasthan. Pages 435-441, Volume I in Proceedings of International Conference<br />

on Environmental Management (Anji Reddy M and Vijaya Lakshmi T eds.).<br />

ICEM’10 (25-28 October, Hyderabad, India). BS Publications, Hyderabad, India.<br />

4. CHOUDHARY S, Hash CT, Prem Sagar, Prasad KVSV and Blümmel M. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Near Infrared Spectroscopy estimation of pearl millet grain composition and feed<br />

quality. Pages 1-4 in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on NIR<br />

Spectroscopy. IM Publication, Chichester, UK.<br />

5. DEVASIRVATHAM V, Tan DKY, Trethowan RM, Gaur PM and<br />

MALLIKARJUNA N. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of high temperature on reproductive stage of<br />

chickpea. In Proceedings of the 15th Australian Society of Agronomy Conference,<br />

15-18 Nov <strong>2010</strong>, Christ Church, New Zealand. Available online at<br />

http://www.regional.org.au/au/asa/<strong>2010</strong>/climate-change/hightemperature/7039_devasirvatham.htm#TopOfPage<br />

6. Gowda CLL, Dar WD, Upadhyaya HD and Yadav D. <strong>2010</strong>. Biodiversity and<br />

achieving the UNMDG of having hunger and poverty by 2015. Pages 24-27 in<br />

International Conference on Biodiversity in relation to food & human security in a<br />

warming planet, 15-17 February <strong>2010</strong>. MSSRF Chennai, India.<br />

7. Herrmann L, HAUSMANN BIG and Traore PS. <strong>2010</strong>. Biodiversity as adaptation<br />

strategy of West African farmers towards climate varaibility. Paper presented at<br />

the International conference “Tropentag”, held at Zuerich, Switzerland, September<br />

14-16, <strong>2010</strong>. Full paper (4 pages) online<br />

http://www.tropentag.de/<strong>2010</strong>/abstracts/full/248.pdf<br />

8. JORGE MA, Claessens G, HANSON J, Dulloo ME, GOLDBERG E,<br />

THORMANN I, Alemayehu S, Gacheru E, Amri A, Benson E, DUMET D, Roux<br />

N, Rudebjer P, Hamilton RS, SANCHEZ I, SHARMA S, Taba S, Upadhyaya HD<br />

and HOUWE IVD. <strong>2010</strong>. Knowledge sharing on best practices for managing crop<br />

genebanks. Pages 1-8 in Proceedings of Scientific and Technical Information and<br />

Rural Development IAALD XIIIth World Congress, Montpellier, 26-29 April<br />

<strong>2010</strong>.<br />

403


9. Kesava Rao AVR and Wani Suhas P. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate change and adaptation<br />

strategies in the Semi-Arid Tropics. Pages 13-22 in Proceedings of the<br />

International Seminar on “Future Farming” at Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 03-04<br />

December <strong>2010</strong>. State Horticulture Mission - Kerala.<br />

10. Kumar S, Nepolean T, Sahrawat KL, Rai KN, Srivastava RK, Singh G and Hash<br />

CT. <strong>2010</strong>. Transgressive segregants for grain Fe and Zn density from two pearl<br />

millet RIL mapping populations. AP Science Congress and Annual Convention of<br />

A.P Akademi of Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad<br />

(JNTUH), India, 18-20 Nov. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

11. Laxmipathi Gowda CL, Pasternak D and Kumar S. <strong>2010</strong>. Crop diversification with<br />

horticultural crops for enhancing incomes and improving livelihoods of poor<br />

farmers in dryland areas. Pages 269-279 in Proceedings of the International<br />

Conference on Horticulture (ICH-2009) (Nath P and Gaddagimath PB, eds.).<br />

Bangalore, India, 9-12 November 2009. Dr Prem Nath Agricultural Science<br />

Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.<br />

12. MGONJA M, Oketayot C, Sheunda P, Ojulong H, Manyasa E and Audi P. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Agricultural Research, Analysis, and Policy Partnerships. Pages 9-45 in New<br />

research and technologies that could increase crop yields, enhance soil fertility and<br />

future partnerships for growth of the agriculture sector across southern.<br />

Responding to Immediate Needs and Building a Foundation for Long-Term<br />

Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction. August <strong>2010</strong>, Nairobi Kenya.<br />

13. MGONJA M. <strong>2010</strong>. Domesticating the Harmonized Seed Security Project<br />

(HASSP), Potential Challenges and Opportunities. Pages 1-16 in Key note paper<br />

prepared and submitted to the Food Agricultural and Natural Resources Policy<br />

Analysis Network (FANRPAN) May <strong>2010</strong>, Kopanong-South Africa. 16 pp.<br />

14. MULA RP, Wani Suhas P, Rai KN and Balaji V. <strong>2010</strong>. Lessons drawn from<br />

women’s participation in <strong>ICRISAT</strong> R&D projects: Talking points for climate<br />

change initiatives. Presented during the conference on Climate Change and Society<br />

on 21-24 June <strong>2010</strong> at the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and<br />

Letters,Trondheim, Norway.<br />

http://climsec.prio.no/paper_view.aspx<br />

www.dknvs.no/climsec<br />

15. Palanisami K, Suresh Kumar D, Wani Suhas P, Mark Giordano and Praduman<br />

Kumar. <strong>2010</strong>. Evaluation of Watershed Development Programs in India using the<br />

Economic Surplus Method. Pages 45-59 in Proceedings of National Workshopcum-Brain<br />

Storming on Rainwater Harvesting and Reuse through Farm Ponds:<br />

Experiences, Issues and Strategies. 21-22 April 2009. CRIDA, Hyderabad.<br />

16. Pande S and SHARMA M. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate change and rainfed crop diseases in<br />

India: Assumptions and Preparedness. (Extended summary) Pages 4-7 in Indian<br />

Phytopathological Society Symposium and Annual Zonal Meet (Delhi Chapter) on<br />

16 th November, <strong>2010</strong>, at Division of Plant Pathology, IARI, New Delhi.<br />

404


17. Pande S, Desai S, and SHARMA M. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of Climate Change on Rainfed<br />

Crop Diseases: Current Status and Future Research Needs. Pages 55-59 (Lead<br />

Papers) in National Symposium on Climate Change and Rainfed Agriculture,<br />

(Venkateswaru B, Mishara PK, Rao VUM, Ravindra Chary G, Srinivasa Rao CH,<br />

Sharma KL, Gopinath KA and Balloli SS, eds.) February 18-20, <strong>2010</strong>. Indian<br />

Society of Dryland Agriculture, Central Research Institute for Dryland<br />

Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.<br />

18. Parthasarathy Rao P, Ravinder Reddy Ch, Ashok AS and Reddy BVS. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Linking farmers with millet markets. Pages 50-55 (Lead paper) in presented at<br />

National Seminar on Millets: Research and Development in Millets—Present<br />

Status and Future Strategies, organized by Directorate of Sorghum Research,<br />

Hyderabad and Directorate of Millets, GOI, Jodhpur, 12 November <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

19. Penmetsa RV, GARCIA NC, Rosen B, Gao J, Sarma BG, Datta S, Vail SL,<br />

Garzon L, Bett K, Vandenberg B, Woodward J, Blair M, Bertioli DJ, May GD,<br />

He G, Bruening GE, Varshney RK and Cook DR. <strong>2010</strong>. Studies of genome<br />

evolution in papilionoid legumes. Plant and Animal Genome XVIII Conference, 9-<br />

13 January <strong>2010</strong>, San Diego, USA. http://www.intlpag.org/18/abstracts/W24_PAGXVIII_178.html<br />

20. Ratnadass A, Avelino J, FERNANDES P, Habib R, Letourmy P and Sarah JL.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Designing ecologically intensive cropping systems for regulating pests and<br />

diseases via plant species diversification-based suppressive processes in the<br />

tropics. Pages 523-524 in Proceedings of Agro<strong>2010</strong> the XIth ESA Congress, Aug<br />

29-Sep 3, Montpellier, France.<br />

21. Reddy AA and RADHIKA RANI. <strong>2010</strong>. Women Employment and Wages in Rural<br />

Andhra Pradesh, The 52nd Annual Conference of the Indian Society of Labour<br />

Economics held at Karnatak University, Karnataka, India, 17-19, December' <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

http://www.isleijle.org/ijle/IssuePdf/ProgramSummary.pdf<br />

22. Sharma HC. <strong>2010</strong>. Global warming and climate change: Impact on arthropod<br />

biodiversity, pest management, and food security. Pages 1-14 in Souvenir,<br />

National Symposium on Perspectives and Challenges of Integrated Pest<br />

Management for Sustainable Agriculture, 19-21 Nov <strong>2010</strong> (Thakur RK, Gupta, PR<br />

and Verma AK, eds.). Nauni, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India: Indian Society of<br />

Pest Management and Economic Zoology/ Dr YS Parmar University of<br />

Horticulture and Forestry.<br />

23. Srinivasa Rao M, Ranga Rao GV, Venkateswarlu B. <strong>2010</strong>. Impact of climate<br />

change on Insect-pests. Pages 43-54 in Proceedings of National symposium on<br />

Climate change and rainfed agriculture, 18-20 February <strong>2010</strong>. Organized by Indian<br />

Society of Dryland Agriculture (ISDA) and Central Research Institute for Dryland<br />

Agriculture (CRIDA), Hyderabad, India.<br />

24. Srinivasa Rao P, Reddy BVS, Thakur RP, Sharma HC, Basavaraj G, Parthasarathy<br />

Rao P, Ravinder Reddy Ch, Ashok Kumar A, Blümmel M and Sharma KK. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Relevance of sweet sorghum as an alternative bioethanol feedstock in India – a<br />

retrospective analysis. 3 rd International Biofuels India <strong>2010</strong>- Sustainable Biofuels<br />

405


Markets and Technology Development, Oct 27-29, New Delhi, India<br />

http://dspace.icrisat.ac.in/bitstream/10731/3650/1/SweetSorghumCII15pp.pdf<br />

25. Wani Suhas P and Boomiraj K. <strong>2010</strong>. Climate Change – Water, Food and<br />

Environment Security. Volume-II, Pages 1302-1328 In Proceedings of the 3 rd<br />

International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management With a Focal<br />

Theme on Climate Change – Water, Food and Environmental Security. Organized<br />

on the occasion of Silver Jubilee Year (2009-<strong>2010</strong>) of Centre for Water Resources,<br />

Institute of Science and Technology, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University,<br />

Hyderabad. 3-6 February <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

26. Wani Suhas P, SREEDEVI TK, Sudi R, Pathak P and MARCELLA D’SOUZA.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Groundwater Management an Important Driver for Sustainable<br />

Development and Management of Watersheds in Dryland Areas. Pages 195-209 in<br />

2 nd National Ground Water Congress. Govt. of India. Ministry of Resources. 22<br />

March <strong>2010</strong>. New Delhi.<br />

27. Gopalakrishnan S, Rupela OP, Humayun P, Kiran BK, SAILASREE J, ALEKHYA<br />

G and Sandeep D. 2009. Bioactive secondary metabolites from PGPR and<br />

Botanicals. Page 45-51 in Plant Growth Promotion by Rhizobacteria for Sustainable<br />

Agriculture. Proceedings for first Asian PGPR Congress, Acharya NG Ranga<br />

Agricultural University, Rahendranagar, Hyderabad, India.<br />

28. Kiran BK, Gopalakrishnan S, Rupela OP, Humayun P and Reddy G. 2009. Assessing<br />

actinomycetes from herbal vermicomposts and their evaluation for PGP traits. Page<br />

569-575 in Plant Growth Promotion by Rhizobacteria for Sustainable Agriculture.<br />

Proceedings for first Asian PGPR Congress, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural<br />

University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.<br />

29. Sharma HC. 2009. Insect pests and pest management in India: The changing scenario.<br />

Pages 1-24 in Summer School on Changing Pest Scenario and Management<br />

Strategies (Ramesh Babu T, Dharma Reddy K, Koteswara Rao SR, Umamaheswari<br />

T and Sridevi D, eds.). Rajendranagar, Andhra Pradesh, India: Department of<br />

Entomology, ANGR Agricultural University.<br />

30. Sharma HC. 2009. Host plant resistance to insects: Potential and limitations. Pages<br />

203-221 in Summer School on Changing Pest Scenario and Management Strategies<br />

(Ramesh Babu T, Dharma Reddy K, Koteswara Rao SR, Umamaheswari T and<br />

Sridevi D, eds.). Rajendranagar, Andhra Pradesh, India: Department of<br />

Entomology, ANGR Agricultural University.<br />

31. Sharma HC. 2009. Insecticidal genes for deployment in genetically engineered<br />

plants for resistance to insect pests. Pages 222-237 in Summer School on Changing<br />

Pest Scenario and Management Strategies (Ramesh Babu T, Dharma Reddy K,<br />

Koteswara Rao SR, Umamaheswari T and Sridevi D, eds.). Rajendranagar, Andhra<br />

Pradesh, India: Department of Entomology, ANGR Agricultural University.<br />

32. Vijay Krishna Kumar K, Krishnam Raju S, Reddy MS, LAWRENCE KK, Groth<br />

DE, Miller ME, Hari Sudini and Binghai Du. 2009. Field Efficacy of Commercial<br />

Formulations of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Plant Extracts against Rice Sheath<br />

406


Blight Disease. Pages 616-620 in Proceedings of First Asian PGPR Congress for<br />

Sustainable Agriculture (Desai S, Reddy MS, Krishna Rao V, Sarma YR, Chenchu<br />

Reddy B and Reddy KRK, eds.), 21-24 June 2009, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh,<br />

India.<br />

407


Monographs<br />

1. Ajeigbe HA, Dashiell K and Woomer PL. <strong>2010</strong>. Biological Nitrogen Fixation<br />

and Grain Legume Enterprise: Guidelines for N2Africa Lead Farmers. Tropical<br />

Soil Biology and Fertility Institute of the International Centre for Tropical<br />

Agriculture Nairobi / International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan<br />

Nigeria. 21pp.<br />

2. Asfaw S, Shiferaw B, Simtowe F, Muricho G, Abate T and Ferede S. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Socio-economic assessment of legume production, farmer technology choice,<br />

market linkages, institutions and poverty in rural Ethiopia. Research <strong>Report</strong><br />

no.3. Nairobi 39063-00623, Kenya, International Crops Research Institute for<br />

the Semi Arid Tropics. 73pp.<br />

3. BANTILAN MCS, TEMPLETON DEBBIE and Crasswell Eric.<strong>2010</strong>. ACIAR<br />

Concepts and tools for agricultural research evaluation and impact. <strong>Report</strong> on<br />

Master Class on Impact Assessment, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh,<br />

India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.<br />

Published by Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR<br />

Monograph Series) Canberra Australia. 86pp.<br />

4. Deb U, KHALED N, Bairagi SK, Amin MA, Ahamad MG and TASNIMA K.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Achieving Boro Rice Production Targets in FY2009-10: Challenges and<br />

Action Required. CPD Occasional Paper 87: Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue<br />

(CPD). http://www.cpd.org.bd/pub_attach/op87.pdf<br />

5. Kamanda JO and BANTILAN MCS. <strong>2010</strong>. The Strategic Potential of Applied<br />

Research: Developing International Public Goods from Development-oriented<br />

Projects. Working Paper Series no 26. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh,<br />

India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 32pp.<br />

6. Kassie M, Shiferaw B and Muricho G.<strong>2010</strong>. Adoption and Impact of Improved<br />

Groundnut Varieties on Rural Poverty Evidence from Rural Uganda<br />

Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series May <strong>2010</strong>. EFD DP 10-<br />

11.<br />

7. Kassie M, Shiferaw B, Asfaw S, Abate T, Muricho G, Teklewold H, Eshete M<br />

and Assefa K. <strong>2010</strong>. Current situation and future outlooks of the chickpea subsector<br />

in Ethiopia. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Working Paper, <strong>ICRISAT</strong> and EIAR, 39pp.<br />

http://www.icrisat.org/tropicallegumesII/pdfs/Current_Situation.pdf<br />

8. Kumara Charyulu D and Subho Biswas. <strong>2010</strong>. Economics and Efficiency of<br />

Organic farming vis-à-vis Conventional Farming in India. Working paper <strong>2010</strong>-<br />

04-03. Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad. 26pp.<br />

http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/<strong>2010</strong>-04-<br />

03Charyulu.pdf<br />

408


9. Kumara Charyulu D and Subho Biswas. <strong>2010</strong>. Efficiency of Organic input units<br />

under NPOF scheme in India. Working paper <strong>2010</strong>-04-01. Indian Institute of<br />

Management, Ahmedabad. 27pp.<br />

http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/assets/snippets/workingpaperpdf/<strong>2010</strong>-04-<br />

01Kumaracharyulu.pdf<br />

10. Mausch K. <strong>2010</strong>. Poverty, Inequality and the Non-farm Economy: The Case of<br />

Rural Vietnam. ISBN 978-3-8325-2461-6 Logos Publishing house, Berlin.<br />

11. Mazvimavi K, Minde IJ, Murendo C and Ndlovu P. <strong>2010</strong>. Zimbabwe<br />

Emergency Agricultural Input Project (ZEAIP) Post Planting Impact Assessment<br />

<strong>Report</strong>. A report submitted to GRM International. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Bulawayo. 21pp.<br />

12. Mazvimavi K, Minde IJ, Murendo C and Ndlovu P. <strong>2010</strong>. Zimbabwe<br />

Emergency Agricultural Input Project (ZEAIP) Retail Vouchers Assessment<br />

<strong>Report</strong>. A report submitted to GRM International. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Bulawayo. 22pp.<br />

13. Mazvimavi K, Minde IJ, Murendo C and Ndlovu P. <strong>2010</strong>. Zimbabwe<br />

Emergency Agricultural Input Project (ZEAIP) Post Harvest <strong>Report</strong>. A report<br />

submitted to GRM International. <strong>ICRISAT</strong> Bulawayo. 22pp.<br />

14. Mazvimavi, K. <strong>2010</strong>. Socio-Economic Analysis of Conservation Agriculture in<br />

Southern Africa. Network Paper 02. Food and Agricultural Organization of the<br />

United Nations (FAO), Regional Emergency Office for Southern Africa (REO-<br />

SA). Johannesburg.<br />

15. Minten B, Alam AZMS, Deb U, Kabir AZK, Laborde D, Hassanullah M,<br />

Murshid KAS. <strong>2010</strong>. Agricultural Marketing, Price Stabilization, Value Chains,<br />

and Global/Regional Trade. Dhaka: Bangladesh Food Security Investment<br />

Forum.<br />

http://bangladeshfoodsecurity.files.wordpress.com/<strong>2010</strong>/05/ag_marketing.pdf<br />

16. Pande S and SHARMA M. <strong>2010</strong>. Change for chickpea. Scientists find that<br />

higher temperature and drought associated with clime change make the chickpea<br />

more susceptible to fungal disease. In CGIAR NEWS, Nov. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

17. Panwar NR, Saha JK, Tapan A, Kundu S, Biswas AK, Rathore A, Ramana<br />

S, Srivastava S and Rao AS. <strong>2010</strong>. Soil and water pollution in India: Some<br />

case studies. Division of Environmental Soil Science, Indian Institute of Soil<br />

Science.<br />

18. Ranga Rao GV, Marimuthu S, Wani Suhas P and Rameshwar Rao. <strong>2010</strong>. Insects<br />

pests of Jatroppha curcas., L. and their management. Information bulletin.<br />

Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh 502 324, India : International Crops Research<br />

Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 24pp.<br />

19. Ravinder Reddy Ch, Nigam SN, Parthasarthy Rao P, Ahmed Shaik, Ratnakar<br />

R, Ashok Alur, Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS and Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>. Village<br />

seed banks: An integrated seed system for improved seed production and supply<br />

– a case study. Information Bulletin No. 87. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra<br />

409


Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.<br />

40pp.<br />

20. Sharma HC. <strong>2010</strong>. Applications of Biotechnology for Insect Pest Management:<br />

Potential and Limitations. VII th Dr S Pradhan Memorial Lecture, 22 May <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

New Delhi, India: Division of Entomology, Indian Agricultural Research<br />

Institute. 59pp.<br />

21. Simtowe F, Shiferaw B, Asfaw S, Abate T, Monyo E, Siambi M and Muricho G.<br />

<strong>2010</strong>. Socio-economic assessment of baseline pigeonpea and groundnut<br />

production conditions, farmer technology choice, market linkages, institutions<br />

and poverty in rural Malawi. <strong>ICRISAT</strong>. 127pp.http://www.icrisat.org/what‐wedo/impi/projects/tl2‐publications/research‐reports/rr‐pp‐gn‐malawi.pdf<br />

22. Simtowe S, Shiferaw, B, Kassie M, Abate T, Silim S, Siambi M, Madzonga O,<br />

Muricho G and Kananji G. <strong>2010</strong>. Assessment of the Current Situation and<br />

Future Outlooks for the Pigeonpea Sub-sector in<br />

Malawi.http://www.icrisat.org/what-we-do/impi/projects/tl2-<br />

publications/regional-situation-outlook-reports/rso-pp-malawi.pdf<br />

23. Subbarao GV, Nakahara K, Ishikawa T, Kishii M, Kudo N, Rao IM, Ishitani M,<br />

Sahrawat KL, Hash CT, George TS, Berry W, LATA JC and Ito O. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Nitrification – is it a strategic point of intervention for limiting nitrogen losses<br />

from agricultural systems? JIRCAS Bulletin No. _. 37pp. Japan International<br />

Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS): Ibaraki 305-8686, Japan.<br />

24. Reddy AA. 2009. Factor Productivity and Marketed surplus of Major Crops in<br />

India, Socio-Economics Research Division, Planning Commission, Government<br />

of India, Yojana Bhawan, New Delhi, India. 69pp.<br />

http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/sereport/ser/ser_fpm.pdf<br />

25. Reddy AA. 2009. Draft report on impact of WTO on oilseed Growers and<br />

Processors in India: A case study of Anantapur district of Andhra Pradesh, South<br />

Asia Network of Economic research Institutions (SANEI), Pakistan. 96pp.<br />

http://www.saneinetwork.net/research/sanei9/Study%205/Abstract.pdf<br />

410


International Newsletters<br />

1. Deb U. <strong>2010</strong>. Adapt and Thrive. Forum. 3(5).<br />

http://www.thedailystar.net/forum/<strong>2010</strong>/may/adapt.htm<br />

2. Deb U. <strong>2010</strong>. Cash Incentives for Agricultural Export. Executive Times.<br />

www.exectimes.com/content/Jul10/AGRICULTURE.asp<br />

3. Deb U. <strong>2010</strong>. Public Private Partnership for Agricultural Development.<br />

Executive Times.<br />

www.exectimes.com/content/june10/AGRICULTURE.asp<br />

4. Gopalakrishnan S. <strong>2010</strong>. Factors responsible for higher yields in SRI. SRI<br />

News Letter 2 (1):8-9.<br />

5. Homann Kee Tui S and van Rooyen A. <strong>2010</strong>. Creating Partnerships for<br />

Change: Successes of Innovation Platforms in Southern Africa in<br />

SATrends http://www.icrisat.org/what-wedo/satrends/satrends<strong>2010</strong>/satrends_feb<strong>2010</strong>.htm<br />

6. Ravinder Reddy Ch, Nigam SN, Parthasarathy Rao P, Ahmed S,<br />

Ratnakar R, Raidu DV, Alur AS, Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS and<br />

Gowda CLL. <strong>2010</strong>. Village seed banks: An integrated seed system for<br />

improved seed production and supply – A case study. Information Bulletin<br />

No. 87, International Crops Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics<br />

Patancheru, 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India. 40pp.<br />

7. Ravinder Reddy Ch, Parthasarathy Rao P, Sanjay Birajdhar, Ashok<br />

Alur, A Rajashekar Reddy, Ashok Kumar A, Reddy BVS and Gowda<br />

CLL. <strong>2010</strong>. Linking small-scale sorghum and pearl Millet farmers to<br />

credit institutions- a case study <strong>2010</strong>. LISA INDIA, 12:13-16.<br />

8. Reddy AA. <strong>2010</strong>. Rural Banking Strategies for Inclusive Growth, The<br />

India Economy Review. 7(2):8-12.<br />

http://www.iipmthinktank.com/publications/archive/ier/ier-may-<strong>2010</strong>.pdf<br />

9. Reddy AA. <strong>2010</strong>. Strategic Planning for Profitable Egg Production in<br />

India, World Poultry, Doetinchem, The Netherlands. Pages:16-17.<br />

http://www.worldpoultry.net<br />

10. Saxena KB, Mula MG, Sugui FP, Domoguen RL and Dar WD. <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

Cashing in on the commercial potentials of pigeonpea. Agri-Cordillera<br />

Magazine 22(1):22-23.<br />

11. Saxena KB, Mula MG, Sugui FP, Domoguen RL and Dar WD. <strong>2010</strong>. The<br />

multiple uses of pigeonpea. Agri-Cordillera Magazine. 22(1):20-21.<br />

411


12. Saxena KB, Mula MG, Sugui FP, Domoguen RL and Dar WD. <strong>2010</strong>. Why<br />

grow pigeonpea in the Philippines. Agri-Cordillera Magazine. 22(1):18-19.<br />

13. Singh NP. <strong>2010</strong>. Mystery behind food price spiral, The Economic Times,<br />

27 Dec <strong>2010</strong>. 8pp.<br />

14. Van Rooyen A and Homann Kee Tui S. <strong>2010</strong>. New Agriculturist –<br />

Livestock and Livelihoods:A Partnership Approach.<br />

http://www.new-ag.info/focus/focusItem.php?a=1617<br />

412

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!