- Page 1 and 2: ICRISAT Archival Report 2010
- Page 3 and 4: ICRISAT Archival Report 2010 MTP Pr
- Page 5 and 6: Achievements in 2010 MTP Output 1:
- Page 7 and 8: The list of promising technologies
- Page 9 and 10: ate would be 41 percent. Hence, abo
- Page 11 and 12: Objectives/Rationale: To gather inf
- Page 13 and 14: Intermediate output target in 2010:
- Page 15 and 16: MTP Output 4: Current agricultural
- Page 17 and 18: Methodology/Approach: Descriptive s
- Page 19 and 20: policy makers use the information a
- Page 21 and 22: ADB feedback, it was reiterated to
- Page 23 and 24: Objectives/Rationale: One of the im
- Page 25 and 26: Methodology: The study required a t
- Page 27: The important topics covered were:
- Page 31 and 32: instead of tea in the morning, in o
- Page 33 and 34: in the marketing system. For sorghu
- Page 35 and 36: Pearl millet: Pearl millet utilizat
- Page 37 and 38: MTP Output 7: Institutional innovat
- Page 39 and 40: CFC funded project: Marathwada Agri
- Page 41 and 42: Objectives/Rationale: The projects
- Page 43 and 44: places where farmers are concentrat
- Page 45 and 46: Intermediate Output target 2010 Zim
- Page 47 and 48: MTP Output target 2011 1.10.2 Repor
- Page 49 and 50: Intermediate output target in 2010-
- Page 51 and 52: village - the credit society group
- Page 53 and 54: c. Case studies Women Self-help gro
- Page 55 and 56: Main findings/Results & Policy Impl
- Page 57 and 58: A number of research papers have be
- Page 59 and 60: A similar training-cum-Project Revi
- Page 61 and 62: questionnaires and CAPI will be imp
- Page 63 and 64: Intermediate output target in 2010
- Page 65 and 66: 30 lines were asymptomatic for Fusa
- Page 67 and 68: Output 2.1: Germplasm of staple cro
- Page 69 and 70: Salinity tolerant chickpea: Salinit
- Page 71 and 72: three accessions (IP 9617, IP 18545
- Page 73 and 74: Evaluation of chickpea reference se
- Page 75 and 76: Germplasm of staple crops assembled
- Page 77 and 78: Countries Involved: India Partner I
- Page 79 and 80:
Germplasm characterized and documen
- Page 81 and 82:
Activity: Conserve safety copy of g
- Page 83 and 84:
Additionally, 2,888 germplasm sampl
- Page 85 and 86:
and for safety duplication at Patan
- Page 87 and 88:
Plant health monitoring during rege
- Page 89 and 90:
Output 2.3: Core, and mini-core col
- Page 91 and 92:
Sweet sorghum germplasm accessions
- Page 93 and 94:
median of 50% flowering of each gro
- Page 95 and 96:
and are best managed through host p
- Page 97 and 98:
Partner Institutions: ICRISAT-Patan
- Page 99 and 100:
Greenhouse evaluation of finger mil
- Page 101 and 102:
variations that were still not expl
- Page 103 and 104:
Vertisol (2005-06) Alfisol (2007-08
- Page 105 and 106:
y = -8.38x - 182.7 R 2 = 0.25*** 60
- Page 107 and 108:
old. The purpose of measuring SPAD
- Page 109 and 110:
Progress/Results: Groundnut referen
- Page 111 and 112:
• Root to total plant dry weight
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 6. Representation of Marker-t
- Page 115 and 116:
Output target 2.3.7: Germplasm sets
- Page 117 and 118:
Output 2.4: Genetic diversity and p
- Page 119 and 120:
Countries Involved: India Partner I
- Page 121 and 122:
Progress/Results: Output target 2.4
- Page 123 and 124:
Progress/Results: Reference sets of
- Page 125 and 126:
Milestone 2.4.6.4: Tetraploid hybri
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 10. Formation of lenticels i
- Page 129 and 130:
with an average of 3.7 alleles per
- Page 131 and 132:
SSR markers and genotyping the mapp
- Page 133 and 134:
Countries Involved: Partner Institu
- Page 135 and 136:
Progress/Results: RILs of chickpea
- Page 137 and 138:
S. No Date Strain Name No. of slope
- Page 139 and 140:
MTP Project 3: Project Coordinator:
- Page 141 and 142:
The female parents however showed a
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 2. Grain yield and percent su
- Page 145 and 146:
Best-bet soil fertility management
- Page 147 and 148:
countries and train local partners
- Page 149 and 150:
national variety trials have been c
- Page 151 and 152:
(1) A series of potential new sweet
- Page 153 and 154:
Management options identified for i
- Page 155 and 156:
conducted as split-plot trials with
- Page 157 and 158:
Conduct mass selection among S0 pla
- Page 159 and 160:
Develop set of backcross population
- Page 161 and 162:
trial with 2 or 3 planting dates (d
- Page 163 and 164:
In the 2 nd trial, five cultivars h
- Page 165 and 166:
Improves soil fertility on the long
- Page 167 and 168:
Results and Discussions In the Mali
- Page 169 and 170:
Results and Discussions 1. Screenin
- Page 171 and 172:
Results and Discussions Following t
- Page 173 and 174:
covering three ICRISAT varieties (S
- Page 175 and 176:
MTP Project 4: Project Coordinator:
- Page 177 and 178:
Countries Involved: Kenya, Tanzania
- Page 179 and 180:
trial was supplied on request to Ta
- Page 181 and 182:
literature/material on groundnut di
- Page 183 and 184:
een recommended and released by the
- Page 185 and 186:
Special Project funding: Bill and M
- Page 187 and 188:
Output target 2009 4.2.5. Groundnut
- Page 189 and 190:
The results of the trial were subje
- Page 191 and 192:
Nuclear seed remains the only sourc
- Page 193 and 194:
varieties have been grown to regene
- Page 195 and 196:
compared to 97 ppb in J11. Other re
- Page 197 and 198:
Kasungu, Ntcheu, Mulanje, Nchisi, N
- Page 199 and 200:
to the check, 296B (1.3 t ha -1 ) f
- Page 201 and 202:
IS 23789 (43.3 t ha -1 ). Dried bmr
- Page 203 and 204:
B. Postrainy season adaptation From
- Page 205 and 206:
2 had significantly 25 and 18 less
- Page 207 and 208:
Screening of sweet sorghum hybrids
- Page 209 and 210:
2417-P3 × IS 41397-3-P6 and 376 fr
- Page 211 and 212:
Milestone 5A.4.2.1: Insect - host g
- Page 213 and 214:
spreading the aphids, suggesting th
- Page 215 and 216:
the two hybrids ranged from 3.3 to
- Page 217 and 218:
13. Non-milo cytoplasmic sweet sorg
- Page 219 and 220:
Milestone: 5A.7.1.2: Six new high-y
- Page 221 and 222:
postrainy season adapted dual-purpo
- Page 223 and 224:
NAIP Project: S.No. Training progra
- Page 225 and 226:
evaluated during 2010 rainy season,
- Page 227 and 228:
Output target 5A.4: QTLs for downy
- Page 229 and 230:
Milestone 5A.6.1.2: Improved popula
- Page 231 and 232:
ecorded by ICPH 4329 with no wilt a
- Page 233 and 234:
Milestone 5A.4.1.2: A hybrid seed p
- Page 235 and 236:
low- bee activity for pollinating A
- Page 237 and 238:
Table 2. Summary performance of hyb
- Page 239 and 240:
1. Evaluation of sweet sorghum geno
- Page 241 and 242:
Milestone 5B.4.1.3: QTL for P acqui
- Page 243 and 244:
mechanisms were interconnected for
- Page 245 and 246:
Thirteen lines had >70 ppm Fe and 4
- Page 247 and 248:
76 ppm Fe at Paithan in Maharashtra
- Page 249 and 250:
Genetics of Fe and Zn content in pe
- Page 251 and 252:
effect on grain Fe content in pearl
- Page 253 and 254:
• Based on the insect bioassays c
- Page 255 and 256:
ust score at 107 DAS = 2.5, LLS sco
- Page 257 and 258:
In an Elite Trial (Spanish) under i
- Page 259 and 260:
For pod yield four test lines (5.0-
- Page 261 and 262:
Conclusions From elite trials, 12 (
- Page 263 and 264:
Milestone: Three mapping population
- Page 265 and 266:
have been advanced to further gener
- Page 267 and 268:
Milestone: 20-30 sources of resista
- Page 269 and 270:
ICC 13524, ICC 15762, and ICC 16903
- Page 271 and 272:
unprotected conditions. At ARS, Tan
- Page 273 and 274:
Damage rating vegetative DRV 4 7-14
- Page 275 and 276:
Results and Discussion Advance gene
- Page 277 and 278:
• Resistant genetic stock for wil
- Page 279 and 280:
unprotected conditions, and can be
- Page 281 and 282:
Results and Discussion The recovery
- Page 283 and 284:
11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 33 HA, PF, Br,
- Page 285 and 286:
Newer constructs with swapped domai
- Page 287 and 288:
Activity 6.1.1.2 SO: Developing QTL
- Page 289 and 290:
Milestone 6.1.1.3.1: Sorghum lines
- Page 291 and 292:
Output C: Annually knowledge of the
- Page 293 and 294:
The plots were sprayed at the 10% f
- Page 295 and 296:
In an Elite Trial (Spanish) grown u
- Page 297 and 298:
Results and Discussion What is repo
- Page 299 and 300:
Conclusions The crosses ICGV 86156
- Page 301 and 302:
Activity 6.2.1.2 CP: Mapping and ma
- Page 303 and 304:
assessed every week and flowers wer
- Page 305 and 306:
100C, night) and heat stress condit
- Page 307 and 308:
An intriguing observation was that
- Page 309 and 310:
Milestone: Five promising transgeni
- Page 311 and 312:
In Preliminary Trial-1, only one li
- Page 313 and 314:
Activity 6.3.4.2 DTOX: Evaluate var
- Page 315 and 316:
Milestone: Nucleus/Breeder seed pro
- Page 317 and 318:
Groundnut: NARS scientist’s field
- Page 319 and 320:
MTP Project 7: Project Coordinator:
- Page 321 and 322:
Activity 7.1.3. The economic perfor
- Page 323 and 324:
Table 3. Vegetable varieties select
- Page 325 and 326:
especially where technical backstop
- Page 327 and 328:
Table 5. Yield of crops in BW5 wate
- Page 329 and 330:
Table 6. Nitrification activities o
- Page 331 and 332:
The adoption of IPM in Kothapally f
- Page 333 and 334:
Table 8. Detail of participatory nu
- Page 335 and 336:
Table 11. Effect of boromag applica
- Page 337 and 338:
Output 7.4: Opportunities for the m
- Page 339 and 340:
Participating Partners: NRCS, IICT
- Page 341 and 342:
short and long rain seasons in Keny
- Page 343 and 344:
accompanied by improved soil manage
- Page 345 and 346:
Special Project Funding: “Managin
- Page 347 and 348:
the systems in Kitui, Mutomo an Mwi
- Page 349 and 350:
After 18 months of implementation,
- Page 351 and 352:
101%. The recovery of the added sul
- Page 353 and 354:
Based on few key criterias (viz. re
- Page 355 and 356:
Partner Institutions: Inran, Niger;
- Page 357 and 358:
study reported CRT-mediated yield (
- Page 359 and 360:
knowledge sharing in agriculture (I
- Page 361 and 362:
in for the Open Source DSpace that
- Page 363 and 364:
10.2.2 Tests and trials on the use
- Page 365 and 366:
Participating Partners: Indian Inst
- Page 367 and 368:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 369 and 370:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 371 and 372:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 373 and 374:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 375 and 376:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 377 and 378:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 379 and 380:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 381 and 382:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 383 and 384:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 385 and 386:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 387 and 388:
Non Thomson Index Journal Article S
- Page 389 and 390:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 391 and 392:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 393 and 394:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 395 and 396:
SNo. ISSN No. Journal Name Journal
- Page 397 and 398:
E-SAT Journal Articles SNo. ISSN No
- Page 399 and 400:
E-SAT Journal Articles 11. 3973-309
- Page 401 and 402:
9. Pande S, SHARMA M and Narayana R
- Page 403 and 404:
Books and Journal Volumes 1. Ajeigb
- Page 405 and 406:
Conference Papers 1. Birthal PS. 20
- Page 407 and 408:
17. Pande S, Desai S, and SHARMA M.
- Page 409 and 410:
Blight Disease. Pages 616-620 in Pr
- Page 411 and 412:
9. Kumara Charyulu D and Subho Bisw
- Page 413 and 414:
International Newsletters 1. Deb U.