22.01.2014 Views

Hedging Quantity Risks with Standard Power Options - UC Berkeley ...

Hedging Quantity Risks with Standard Power Options - UC Berkeley ...

Hedging Quantity Risks with Standard Power Options - UC Berkeley ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

706 Naval Research Logistics, Vol. 53 (2006)<br />

where<br />

B 1 (p) ≡<br />

g(p) (<br />

f p (p)<br />

m2 − m 1<br />

E Q[ g(p)<br />

] = exp log p + m2 1 − m2 2<br />

− (m 1 − m 2 ) 2 )<br />

s 2 2s 2 s 2 f p (p)<br />

= e − (m 1 −m 2 )(m 1 −3m 2 )<br />

2s 2 p m 2 −m 1<br />

s 2<br />

B 2 (p) ≡ E[y(p, q)|p] =E[(r − p)q|p] =(r − p)<br />

(<br />

m + ρ u )<br />

s (log p − m 1)<br />

B 3 ≡ E Q [E[y(p, q)|p]]<br />

(<br />

= (r − E Q [p]) m − ρ u )<br />

s m 1 + ρ u s (rEQ [log p]−E Q [p log p])<br />

= ( r − e m ) ( 2+ 1 2 s2 m − ρ u )<br />

s m 1 + ρ u (<br />

rm2 − (m 2 + s 2 )e m )<br />

2+ 1 2 s2 .<br />

s<br />

We have used the following formulas in the calculation.<br />

E Q [log p] =m 2<br />

E Q [p] =e m 2+ 1 2 s2<br />

E Q [p log p] =(m 2 + s 2 )e m 2+ 1 2 s2<br />

E Q [p 2 ]=e 2m 2+2s 2<br />

1<br />

(−<br />

g(p)<br />

f p (p) = ps √ sπ exp 1 2<br />

1<br />

ps √ sπ exp (− 1 2<br />

( ) ) 2 log p−m2<br />

s<br />

(<br />

log p−m1<br />

s<br />

) 2<br />

) = exp<br />

(<br />

m2 − m 1<br />

log p + m2 1 − )<br />

m2 2<br />

s 2 2s 2<br />

[ ] ( g(p)<br />

E Q m2 − m 1<br />

= exp m<br />

f p (p)<br />

s 2 2 + m2 1 − m2 2<br />

+ (m 2 − m 1 ) 2 ) ( (m1 − m 2 ) 2 )<br />

= exp<br />

2s 2 2s 2 s 2<br />

We’ve also used q|p ∼ N ( m + ρ u s (log p − m 1), u 2 (1 − ρ 2 ) )<br />

to obtain<br />

Then, we can get the explicit functions for the optimal payoff<br />

for the mean-variance utility:<br />

ln E[e −ay(p,q) |p] ≡ln E[e −a(r−p)q |p]<br />

(<br />

=−a(r − p) m + ρ u )<br />

s (log p − m 1)<br />

+ 1 2 a2 (r − p) 2 u 2 (1 − ρ 2 ).<br />

3.1.6. Bivariate Lognormal Distribution<br />

for Price and Load<br />

Suppose the marginal distributions of p and q, on the other<br />

hand, follow bivariate lognormal distributions as follows:<br />

Under P : log p ∼ N(m 1 , s 2 ), log q ∼ N ( m q , uq) 2 ,<br />

Corr(log p, log q) = φ<br />

Under Q : log p ∼ N(m 2 , s 2 ).<br />

Naval Research Logistics DOI 10.1002/nav<br />

where<br />

x ∗ (p) = 1 a (1 − B 1(p)) − B ′ 2 (p) + B′ 3 B 1(p), (15)<br />

B 2 ′ (p) ≡ E[y(p, q)|p] =E[(r − p)q|p]<br />

= (r − p)e m q+φ uq s (log p−m 1)+ 1 2 u2 q (1−φ2 )<br />

since log q|p ∼ N(m q + φ u q<br />

s (log p − m 1), u 2 q (1 − φ2 )), and<br />

B ′ 3 ≡ EQ [E[y(p, q)|p]]<br />

= re m q+φ uq s (m 2−m 1 )+ 1 2 u2 q (1−φ2 )+ 1 2 φ2 u2 q<br />

s 2 s2<br />

− e m 2+m q +φ uq s (m 2−m 1 )+ 1 2 u2 q (1−φ2 )+ 1 2 (φ uq s +1)2 s 2 . (16)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!