01.02.2014 Views

Untitled - CGIAR Impact

Untitled - CGIAR Impact

Untitled - CGIAR Impact

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN RICE SUPPLY RELATIONS 37<br />

For the technology variable in the area function, we used the average ratio of<br />

rice yield to maize yield per hectare for the past 5 years ( Y 1 ), which is supposed<br />

to represent the relative level of rice technology ( T ) to the technology of a<br />

major alternative crop ( Ta ). Another technology variable that was used in the<br />

area function was the ratio of rice yield to the average yield of five alternative<br />

crops ( Y 2 ), including maize, coconut, sugar, tobacco, and abaca. As a technology<br />

variable in the analysis of yield function, we tried the ratio of area planted<br />

with MV to total rice crop area ( M ). M is supposed to represent a level of rice<br />

production technology per se. In the yield function, only M was included in the<br />

regression analysis.<br />

A major deficiency in our supply analysis for the Philippines was that we<br />

failed to specify any appropriate variable to represent weather ( W ). In the case<br />

of Thailand, the average rainfall is usually the decisive factor in determining<br />

both area planted to rice and yield. However, in the Philippines, typhoons, usually<br />

accompanied by heavy rainfall, are the major cause of crop damage. Therefore,<br />

it is difficult to select a single factor to represent weather conditions for<br />

rice production. For future improvement of rice supply analysis in the Philippines,<br />

the construction of an appropriate weather index will be a critical step.<br />

Thailand. Aggregate time-series data used for the analysis of rice supply<br />

relations in Thailand cover the period from the 1951-52 crop year to the<br />

1973-74 crop year.<br />

Data on rice and nonrice crop areas, and of rice yield per hectare are plotted<br />

in Figure 4 (the areas are in gross terms, counted twice in case of double-<br />

4. Trends in areas planted to rice and nonrice crops, and rice yield per hectare, in<br />

Thailand, 1951-73.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!