Agenda Item - East Sussex County Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 1 the number of allegations that were substantiated remain the same. The increased number of alerts alongside the lower percentage of substantiated allegations suggests that people are more prepared to report cases of suspected abuse, including those cases that might not have previously have been considered serious enough to warrant reporting. The outcomes for the victims 4.38 It is important that the outcomes for victims are monitored closely as this can be used in the future to inform models of best practice around how certain types of abuse are dealt with. The table below provides details about the outcomes of investigations for the victims: Table 14: Outcomes for the alleged victims 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 Total % of Total % of Total Referrals Total Referrals Total Referrals started Referrals started Referrals started Outcomes for Alleged Victim Increased Monitoring Vulnerable Adult removed from property or service Community Care Assessment and Services Referral to advocacy scheme Referral to Counselling / Training Management to access to finances No further action % of Total Referrals 215 40.2% 261 17.8% 358 22.7% 24 4.5% 79 5.4% 31 2.0% 5 0.9% 19 1.3% 14 0.9% 1 0.2% 3 0.2% 2 0.1% 6 1.1% 17 1.2% 47 3.0% 4 0.7% 23 1.6% 34 2.2% 58 10.8% 551 37.5% 550 34.8% 37
Outcomes for Alleged Victim Guardianship / Use of Mental Health Act Restriction / management of access to alleged perpetrator Other Perpetrator Removed Provider guidelines/ Risk assessment revised Service quality issues addresses Refused Intervention Not yet completed Total Total Referrals started Appendix 1 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 % of Total % of Total Total Referrals Total Referrals Referrals started Referrals started % of Total Referrals 2 0.4% 1 0.1% 1 0.1% 1 0.2% 27 1.8% 26 1.6% 85 15.9% 95 6.5% 106 6.7% 34 6.4% 73 5.0% 76 4.8% 59 11.0% 67 4.6% 55 3.5% 23 4.3% 51 3.5% 92 5.8% 18 3.4% 31 2.1% 17 1.1% _ 170 11.6% 170 10.8% 535 1468 1579 4.39 The highest percentage of outcomes has been classified as ‘No further action’ with 34.8% of all referrals being classified as such. This outcome occurs when the initial safeguarding plan and investigation has addressed the issues identified so no further action is considered necessary. 4.40 A further 22.7% of referrals had an outcome of increased monitoring which includes any investigations that require ongoing monitoring of the safeguarding plan. 4.41 The results have also shown a reduction every year in the number of referrals that have resulted in intervention being refused, suggesting that the outcomes of the referrals are becoming more closely tailored to an individuals circumstances. 4.42 The following table provides a further breakdown of the most significant increases and decreases in the outcomes of referrals for the victim. Table 15: Top 5 increase and decrease in outcomes for alleged victims % % increase decrease from from 2008/09 to referrals in 2008/09 to 2009/10 2009/10 2009/10 Outcome - top 5 increases Referral to Counselling/ Training Service Quality Issues Addressed Management of Access to Finances +176% 47 Outcome - top 5 decreases Vulnerable Adult Removed from Property referrals in 2009/10 -61% 31 +80% 92 Refused Intervention -45% 17 +48% 34 Increased Monitoring +37% 358 Other +12% 106 Referral to Advocacy Scheme Community Care Assessment Provider Guidelines/ Risk Assessment Revised -33% 2 -26% 14 -18% 55 38
Page 1 and 2: Agenda Item 5 Report to: Lead Membe
Page 3 and 4: Appendix 1 1
Page 5 and 6: Appendix 1 7 Self-Directed Support
Page 7 and 8: Appendix 1 1 National Context 1.1 T
Page 9 and 10: Appendix 1 2 Regional Developments
Page 11 and 12: Appendix 1 3.4 Subgroups Work Progr
Page 13 and 14: Appendix 1 3.7 Workforce Developmen
Page 15 and 16: Appendix 1 a national organisation,
Page 17 and 18: Appendix 1 A one day course for adm
Page 19 and 20: Appendix 1 Control 18 staff attende
Page 21 and 22: Appendix 1 3. Adult Social Care Old
Page 23 and 24: Appendix 1 To ensure the department
Page 25 and 26: Appendix 1 6. Adult Social Care Men
Page 27 and 28: 3.8 Performance, Quality & Audit Su
Page 29 and 30: Appendix 1 These forums help to ens
Page 31 and 32: Appendix 1 Ethnicity of alleged vic
Page 33 and 34: Appendix 1 4.13 Investigations into
Page 35 and 36: Appendix 1 2007/08 Levels of invest
Page 37 and 38: Appendix 1 Source of Referrals 4.26
Page 39 and 40: Appendix 1 1.6% 1.2% 14.6% 61.9% 20
Page 41: Other Mental Health Team Learning D
Page 45 and 46: For Alleged Perpetrator / Organisat
Page 47 and 48: Appendix 1 • 1 of the complaints
Page 49 and 50: 6.1 Sussex Police (Specialist Inves
Page 51 and 52: Appendix 1 services to people with
Page 53 and 54: Appendix 1 6.3 This section refers
Page 55 and 56: Appendix 1 Summary of Safeguarding
Page 57 and 58: Appendix 1 within the clinical and
Page 59 and 60: 6.5 East Sussex Hospital Trust Safe
Page 61 and 62: Appendix 1 6.6 Registered Care Home
Page 63 and 64: Local Life Show 2011 Appendix 1 We
Page 65 and 66: Appendix 1 Who can apply? We are in
Page 67 and 68: Appendix 1 1.3 Authorisation of DOL
Page 69 and 70: 9 Quality Monitoring Team Appendix
Page 71: Contributor organisations to East S

Agenda Item - East Sussex County Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?