Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win - CMAA

CMAA National Owner’s Forum 

Special Military Session 

Construction and Energy Challenges

Opening Remarks 

Col. David F. DeMartino, P.E. 

United States Air Force 

Air Education Training Command 

Civil Engineer

Develop America's Airmen Today ... for Tomorrow 

Colonel Dave DeMartino 

Air Education and Training Command 

Civil Engineer 

Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win

Funding and Procurement 

Challenges 


”Gentlemen, we have run out of money. It's time to start thinking.” 

- Sir Ernest Rutherford 

It’s a culture change…one that will affect every AF organization! 



Historical TOA ($B) 


Department of Defense 

It’s the worst year ever…is an overused phrase! 

Air Force 

Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win 

*CY 2011 Dollars


Risk in Infrastructure 


Sustaining 50+ y/o utility sys 

across Command 

Facility Recap rate is 65+ yrs 

(too long between projects) 

MILCON 

$244M in FY11 

Just one AF FY13 CM MILCON 

Sustainment 

$181M in FY11 

80% of OSD Model Rqmt 

MILCON centrally managed at HAF w/model 

R&M centrally managed at MAJCOM w/model 

HAF developing SRM Model for future 

(SRM $/sf investment ↓ 57% last 10 yrs) 

R&M 

$4M in FY11 

Survive on EOY 

Backlog $1.4B+ 

Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win 

6

Facility Performance 

Expected Service Life 


Facility Lifecycle Performance 


Modernization 

investments are needed 

to meet current standards 

& extend service life 

New 

Dormitory 

Completed 

R&M – To 

extend the 

Service Life 

of Dormitory 

R&M – To 

extend the 

Service Life 

of Dormitory 

Service life with only 

Sustainment (FSM) funding (line 

assumes 100%). Facility life 

shortened at 90% funding 

At some 

point, R&M 

can’t help, 

need New 

Dormitory -- 

MILCON 

Facility Age in Years 



Production Impacts 


• Some FY11 End of Year R&M examples 

• Lackland Power Distribution 

• Luke Airfield Lighting Vault 

• Sheppard Waste Water Distribution 

• Altus DFAC HVAC/R System 

• Maxwell Potable Water Distribution 

Risk to Production Drives Needed Investment 



R&M Scoring Process 


1. Wing Commander Priority Score = (Max 100 pts) 

2. Mission – Condition Score [(MDI x FCI) + FIM] = (Max 149 pts) 

a. Mission Dependency Index (MDI) X 

Facility Condition Index (FCI) 

= (Max 99 pts) 

b. Facility Investment Metric (FIM) score = (Max 50 pts) 

CRITICAL DEGRADED ESSENTIAL 

50 pts 30 pts 10 pts 

3. Balance Scorecard Risk (BSCR) score = (Max 50 pts) 

Red Yellow Green 

50 pts 25 pts 0 pts 

4. MAJCOM Functional Priority Score = (Max 50 pts) 

= (Max 349 pts) 


Priority Areas…and Need for Help 

• Help us achieve Sustainable Installations 

• Help us get the most from our Tax dollar 

• Help us find good projects in these areas 

• Demolition/Consolidation ~$400M 

• Energy ~$225M 

• Airfield pavements ~$100M 

• Dorms ~$100M 

• Infrastructure 


• Help us find other ways to provide/repair facilities/infra 



Air Education and Training 

Command 

“The First Command” 


Construction Panel 

Col. Richard J. Muraski Jr. 

United States Corps of Engineers 

Commander 

Fort Worth Engineer District

Real 

Estate 

Civil Works 

Snapshot of Fort Worth District 

Missions 

• Military construction 

• Base operations 

• Environmental restoration 

• Geospatial Engineering 

• Hydropower 

• Flood control, Shore Protection 

• Water Supply, Regulatory 

• Recreation, Disaster response 

• Environmental Restoration 

• Acquire, manage & 

dispose 

• DOD Recruiting facilities 

• Contingency operations 

BUILDING STRONG ®

BRAC Projects by Installation 

Location # of Projects PA BOD 

Complete 

Remaining 

Fort Bliss 44 $2,035.4M 41 3 

Fort Sam Houston 29 $1,698.4M 13 16 

Lackland AFB 6 $87.8M 5 1 

Laughlin AFB 7 $13.6M 7 0 

Randolph AFB 4 $17.6M 2 2 

Total 90 $3,852.8M 68 22 

BUILDING STRONG ®

Fort Bliss BRAC Program 

Combat Aviation Brigade Complex 

3 Heavy Brigade Complexes 

Accomplishments 

44 Projects 

142 Facilities 

12 Training Ranges 

2,500 Acres 

7,000,000 SF 

$2,000,000,000 

Innovative Approach 

• Land Development Engineer 

• Product Line 

• Troop Ready 

Training Campus 

Central Wash Facility 

Division Headquarters 

BUILDING STRONG ®

Fort Sam Houston -BRAC Total: $1.893M 

Construct Building 2261 (IMCOM HQ) 

METC Physical Fitness Center 

Battlefield Health and Trauma facility 

SAMMC Consolidated Parking Structure 

SAMMC Central Energy Plant (CEP) 

METC Medical Instructional Facility 4 

BUILDING STRONG ®

• Quality of Life Facilities 

What’s Next 

Medical, WT complexes, Fitness centers, dual use facilities 

• Future Focuses FY12 and FY 13 

► Natural attenuation in program from BRAC surge 

► Shift in Focus to Lackland - $1B+ Program 

► More community support - Dorms, classrooms, D-facilities, religious 

center, commercial center, fire rescue, and some mission. 

• Construction management consultants: We need you! 

► Specialized experience and expertise 

► Surge capability to enable us to accomplish the mission 

► Bring fresh perspective, new ideas, and new tools/techniques to the 

team 

BUILDING STRONG ®


Mr. Joe Hockaday, P.E. 

Air Force Center for Engineering and the Environment 

(AFCEE) 

Chief, Air Force MILCON 

Project Management Office West

Air Force Center for Engineering 

and the Environment 

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 

CMAA 2011 Owner’s Forum 

Air Force Design & 

Construction 

Mr. Joe Hockaday, P.E. 

Chief AF MILCON PMO West 

15 May 2011

AF MILCON Focus Areas 

Military Construction 

(MILCON) 

• Enables AF Missions 

• Beddown of New Mission 

facilities & infrastructure 

• Provides Joint, Coalition & 

COCOM support 

• Recapitalizes aging 

infrastructure focusing on 

• Operational, mission support, 

and Quality of Life priorities 

• Incorporates & enables 

modernization, sustainability 

Continue to Strengthen 

the Nuclear Enterprise 

Partner w/ the Joint and Coalition 

Team to Win Today’s Fight 

Develop and Care for 

Airmen and their Families 

Modernize our Air, Space, and 

Cyberspace Inventories, 

Organizations & Training 


20 20

1400 

1200 

1000 

800 

600 

400 

200 

0 

$M 

9% 

5% 

26% 

36% 

25% 

Must Pay $131.0M 

FY12 MILCON Requirements 

$1,436M 

Planning & Design (P&D) $96.3M P-341 $34.7M 

Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise $75.6M 

B-52 3-Bay Conventional Muns MX Fac $11.8M B-52 2-Bay Phase MX Dock $34.0M 

WSA Security Control Facility $4.8M AFNWC Sustainment Center $25.0M 

Partner with the Joint and Coalition Team to Win Today’s Fight $373.1M 

Unmanned Aerial Surveillance (UAS) $21.7M Air Freight Terminal Complex $35.0M 

TACP Facilities $7.6M USSTRATCOM Replacement Fac $150.0M 

Guam Strike/Resiliency $147.2M Communications Center $11.6M 

Develop and Care for Airmen and Their Families $509.4M 

Blatchford-Preston Complex Ph IV $37.0M Air Force Permanent Party Dorms $190.0M 

Basic Military Training (BMT) Dorm $64.0M Child Development Center $11.2M 

Army Barracks at Joint Bases $193.0M Education Center $14.2M 

Modernize our Air, Space, & Cyberspace Inventories, Orgs &Trng 

Guam Pacific Readiness Trng Ctr (PRTC) $29.4M C-5M Formal Training Unit $2.8M 

F-22 Mission Facilities $56.0M HC/EC C-130 Facilities $39.0M 

F-35 Mission/Training Facilities $55.1M Operations/Training Support $164.6M 


$346.9M 

21

• LEED & Sustainability 

• Silver w/emphasis on Energy/Water 

Design & Construction 

• Building Information Modeling (BIM) – Design & 

Construction 

• BIM required for all vertical construction 

• BIM-Build Delivery Method? 

• Design Build (DB) 

• Move away from bridging towards performance based 

Challenges 

• Leading edge Energy reduction technology that is… 

• Life Cycle Cost effective 

• Maintainable 

• Future Energy Goals 

• 80% Fossil Fuel Reduction by 2020 

• Carbon Neutral by 2030 

We need your great ideas! 


22 22


Mr. Michael J. Smietana, P. E., LEED AP 

Army and Air Force Exchange Service 

The Exchange 

Vice President, Real Estate Support Division

Exchange Facts 

Where We Are 

50 – US States 

5 – US Territories 

30+ Countries 

Provide Goods and Services 

- $10B Revenue 

- 3100+ Facilities 

- Proprietary Credit Card 

- Water and Bread Plants 

- Worldwide Logistics 

Supply Chain 

- Catalogs 

- Online shopping 

What We Have 

185 Main Stores 

92 Contingency Stores 

192 Shoppettes 

Over 5,000 Services and 

vendors 

1836 Specialty Stores 

• Class Six 

• Box Office Video 

• Bookmark 

772 Military Clothing Stores 

Support for Army , 

Air Force, Navy, Marine 

MWR Services 

Dividends: 

$253.6 Million FY 10 

Army = $147.4 Million 

Air Force = $86.3 Million 

Navy = $1.0 Million 

Marine = $11.5 Million 

Guard/Res = $7.4 Million

Exchange Vision and Mission 

Vision: 

To be our Customers’ First 

Choice by providing high quality 

goods and services at low prices 

and at the lowest cost. 

Mission: 

Provide quality merchandise and 

services at competitively low 

prices; and 

Generate earnings to support 

MWR and AF services programs.

Vision: 

Real Estate Vision and Mission 

Be a Catalyst for Business Growth 

Mission: 

Plan, Develop, Construct and Maintain 

Exchange Real Estate Property 

Increase “Stakeholder Value” 

Develop Life Long Emotional Connections 

Grow The Business 

Improve Earning 

26

Return on Investment 

A financially desired project 

10% and above 

A financially acceptable project 

7% - 9.9% 

A financially marginal project 

Below 7% 

27

Current Planning Environment 

‣ Revenues VS Dividends / Expenses / Recapitalization Requirements 

1. Economy and Public Have a Vote in Revenue Generation 

2. Across the Retail Industry Revenues are Below Expectations 

3. Revenue Directly Impacts Capability to Invest in Facilities 

4. Dividends Basically Paid Up Front, Generally Remain Constant 

‣ Reduced Revenue Impacts Recapitalization Program 

1. Reduction in projects 4 Shopping Centers Reduced to 2/3 

2. Renewed focus on sustainment projects 

‣ Additional Planning Considerations 

1. 49,000 personnel reduction 

2. $78 billion reduction in DoD Budget 

3. 23% drop in FY11 construction spending, can expect same for outyears 

4. AF is stressing facility re-utilization vs new construction 

‣ APF Requirements Must Be Met 

1. Garrison / IMCOM ($750K) 

2. MILCON 

3. The Exchange (AAFES) is not budgeted to support APF 

28


Mr. Randy Holman 

United States Corps of Engineers 

Joint Program Management Office 

Fort Sam Houston 

Deputy Director

Energy Panel 

Col Scott Hartford, P.E. 

Air Education Command 

HQ AETC/A7C 

Randolph AFB 

Chief, Civil Engineer Operations

CMAA Owners Forum 

15 May, 2011 


Energy Challenges 

& 

Solutions 

Col Scott Hartford, P.E. 

HQ AETC/A7C 

scott.hartford@us.af.mil 


AF Energy Use 


AF Energy Use (normalized to BTUs) 

AETC Consumption Profile is Similar 

AF Annual Energy Cost = $7B 

Briefer: Col Scott Hartford, A7C 


• “Risk” in Infrastructure: 

• Energy “focus funding” program ($225M/yr) 

• Reduced MILCON: 

• LEED Silver and ECIP Program 

• Facility Reduction Initiatives: 

• 20/20 by 2020; Demolition/Consolidation “focus funding” 

• Energy Intensive Ops Tempo: 


• Increased student throughput; increased use of simulators & IT 

• Coming electrification of ground vehicles 

• Privatization Initiatives: 

AF Energy 

Challenges & Solutions 

• Housing Privatization; Utilities Privatization 



• Smart Metering / Industrial Control Systems: 

• NexGen IT; ICS Certification & Accreditation 

• Energy Expertise: 

• Resource Efficiency Manager (REM) program 

• Technology Challenges: 


• Deployable technologies; microgrids, energy storage; O&M issues 

• Energy Economics: 

• Project SIR/Payback; Tax Credits, Incentives, Rebates, REC Sales 

• 3 rd party financing – ESPCs, PPAs, EULs 

• Culture Change: 

AF Energy 

Challenges & Solutions 

• Incentive Award; Education/Training; Performance Reporting 



Orient Building 

for solar benefit 

1 st AF LEED Platinum Facility 

Tyndall AFB Fitness Center 

Extensive Day Lighting - 

7 Step Light Dimmers 


Solar Hot 

Water 

Lots of Insulation 

43% Lower 

Energy Costs 

95% Efficient 

Boiler 

LEED - Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design 



Expand Renewable Energy 

Luke AFB Solar Array 




Energy Panel 

Mr. Boyce Bourland, P.E., RA 

Defense Commissary Agency 

Chief, Facilities Division 

Lackland AFB

Defense Commissary Agency 

Energy and the Environment

State of the Practice 

• DeCA was energy conscious well before “green” became fashionable 

• Early adopter of 

Refrigeration, Management 

and Control System (RMCS) 

• Heat reclaim systems 

• Current criteria incorporates 

over 50 cost effective, energy 

efficient strategies 

• $100M in cumulative energy 

savings 

• 2009 NREL study determined 

the ASHRAE average Energy 

Use Intensities for 

commercial supermarkets 

range from 220 to 340 

kBTU/SF/yr (depending on 

location) 

• 96% of DeCA facilities used 

less than 220 kBTU/SF in 

FY2010

Regulation and Legislation 

• DoD Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan 

• Energy Policy Act of 2005 

• EO 13423 - Strengthening Federal Environmental, 

Energy, and Transportation Management 

• Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007 

• EO 13514 – Federal Leadership in Environmental, 

Energy, and Economic Performance 

• UFC 4-030-01 Sustainable Development 

• 15% of building inventory must comply with Guiding Principles 

for Sustainable and High Performance Bldgs by 2015 

• Reduce energy consumption, agency-wide, by 30% by 2015 

• Reduce fossil fuel use by 55% by 2010 and by 100% by 2030 

• Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) 

• Climate Change Adaptation Planning - Implementing 

Instructions IAW EO 13514 issued April 4, 2011

Energy Panel 

Lt. Col. John Wrockloff, BSC 

United States Air Force 

Air Force Medical Support Agency 

Deputy Chief, Health Facilities Division

Air Force Medical Service Energy Monitoring – 

Energy Data is Centrally Collected; Energy Star Is Utilized for Comparison 

Cellular 

Web-Server Host 

AFMS Energy Server 

Wireless Data 

Transport 

Cellular Reporting Unit 

At Facility 

Web Site 

EEM Dashboards 

E-Star Portfolio 

Manager 

Data Gathering / New Advanced Metering to Collect 

all Energy & Water used at Primary Facilities 

AFMS User Interface


Peer Comparison of Clinics in Old Hospital Chassis 

100 

90 

80 

73 

70 

68 

63 62 

60 

57 

54 54 

50 

49 48 

46 45 45 44 

40 

30 

38 37 

34 33 

31 31 30 

28 

25 

20 

10 

21 20 

18 

14 14 

10 

6 

0 

Names withheld to protect the less than Innocent

Energy Star Score 


Behavior & Leadership Play a Major Role in Energy Conservation 

55 

Base X Clinic Energy Star Performance 

50 

Change of Command - 

New Leadership focused 

on comfort over energy 

conservation 

45 

40 

35 

Completed Major Mechanical restoration 

to include new controls, AHU replacement, 

chiller and condenser replacement. Fac 

Mgt started night set-backs and compliance 

with Temp Set-points 

30

Questions?

Aim High...Fly-Fight-Win - CMAA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?