EQUI-VEST - AXA Equitable
EQUI-VEST - AXA Equitable
EQUI-VEST - AXA Equitable
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
effect on the Portfolio or on Caywood-Scholl’s ability to perform its investment<br />
advisory services relating to the Portfolio.<br />
The foregoing speaks only as of the date of this prospectus. While there<br />
may be additional litigation or regulatory developments in connection<br />
with the matters discussed above, the foregoing disclosure of litigation<br />
and regulatory matters will be updated if those developments are<br />
material.<br />
Evergreen Investment Management Company LLC<br />
(“EIMC”)<br />
Pursuant to an administrative order issued by the SEC on September 19,<br />
2007, Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC (“EIMC”),<br />
Evergreen Investment Services, Inc. (“EIS”), Evergreen Service Company,<br />
LLC (“ESC” and together with EIMC and EIS, the “Evergreen Entities”),<br />
Wachovia Securities, LLC and the SEC have entered into an agreement<br />
settling allegations of (i) improper short-term trading arrangements relating<br />
to mutual funds advised and distributed by the Evergreen Entities<br />
(“Evergreen funds”) in effect prior to May 2003 involving former officers<br />
and employees of EIMC and certain broker-dealers, (ii) insufficient<br />
systems for monitoring exchanges and enforcing exchange limitations<br />
as stated in certain Evergreen funds’ prospectuses, and (iii) inadequate<br />
e-mail retention practices. Under the settlement, the Evergreen Entities<br />
were censured and will pay approximately $32 million in disgorgement<br />
and penalties. This amount, along with a fine assessed by the SEC<br />
against Wachovia Securities, LLC, will be distributed pursuant to a plan<br />
to be developed by an independent distribution consultant and approved<br />
by the SEC. The Evergreen Entities neither admitted nor denied<br />
the allegations and findings set forth in their settlement with the SEC.<br />
In addition, the Evergreen funds and EIMC and certain of its affiliates<br />
are involved in various legal actions, including private litigation and<br />
class action lawsuits. EIMC does not expect that any of such legal actions<br />
currently pending or threatened will have a material adverse<br />
impact on the financial position or operations of the EQ/Evergreen<br />
International Bond Portfolio, EQ/Evergreen Omega Portfolio or on<br />
EIMC’s ability to provide services to the Portfolios.<br />
Although EIMC believes that none of the matters discussed above will<br />
have a material adverse impact on the EQ/Evergreen Omega Portfolio or<br />
the EQ/Evergreen International Bond Portfolio, there can be no assurance<br />
that these matters and any publicity surrounding or resulting from<br />
them will not result in reduced sales or increased redemptions of Portfolio<br />
shares, which could increase Portfolio transaction costs or operating<br />
expenses, or that they will not have other adverse consequences on the<br />
Portfolios.<br />
Franklin Advisory Services, LLC, Franklin Mutual Advisers,<br />
LLC, Franklin Advisers, Inc. and Templeton Global Advisors<br />
Limited<br />
On August 2, 2004, Franklin Resources, Inc. announced that Franklin<br />
Advisers, Inc. (“Franklin Advisers”) (adviser to many of the funds within<br />
Franklin Templeton Investments, and an affiliate of the adviser to the<br />
other funds) reached a settlement with the SEC that resolved the issues<br />
resulting from the SEC’s investigation of market timing activity in the<br />
Franklin Templeton Investments funds. Under the terms of the settlement<br />
and the SEC’s administrative order, pursuant to which Franklin<br />
Advisers neither admitted nor denied any of the findings contained<br />
therein, Franklin Advisers agreed, among other matters, to pay $50 million,<br />
of which $20 million is a civil penalty, to be distributed to shareholders<br />
of certain funds in accordance with a plan to be developed by<br />
an independent distribution consultant. Such a distribution plan has<br />
been prepared and submitted to the SEC for approval. After publication<br />
of notice of the plan and a 30-day comment period, the proposed plan<br />
of distribution will be submitted to the SEC for approval. Following the<br />
SEC’s approval of the plan of distribution, with modifications as appropriate,<br />
distribution of the settlement monies will begin in accordance<br />
with the terms and conditions of that settlement and the plan.<br />
Franklin Resources, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries and certain funds,<br />
current and former officers, employees, and directors have been named<br />
in multiple lawsuits in different courts alleging violations of various federal<br />
securities and state laws and seeking, among other relief, monetary<br />
damages, restitution, removal of fund trustees, directors, advisers, administrators,<br />
and distributors, rescission of management contracts and<br />
12b-1 plans, and/or attorneys’ fees and costs. Specifically, the lawsuits<br />
claim breach of duty with respect to alleged arrangements to permit<br />
market timing and/or late trading activity, or breach of duty with respect<br />
to the valuation of the portfolio securities of certain Templeton funds<br />
managed by Franklin Resources, Inc. subsidiaries, allegedly resulting in<br />
market timing activity. The majority of these lawsuits duplicate, in<br />
whole or in part, the allegations asserted in the SEC’s findings as described<br />
above. The lawsuits are styled as class actions, or derivative actions<br />
on behalf of either the named funds or Franklin Resources, Inc.<br />
To date, more than 400 similar lawsuits against at least 19 different<br />
mutual fund companies, among other defendants, have been filed in<br />
federal district courts throughout the country. Because these cases involve<br />
common questions of fact, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation<br />
(the “Judicial Panel”) ordered the creation of a multidistrict<br />
litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,<br />
entitled “In re Mutual Funds Investment Litigation” (the “MDL”). The<br />
Judicial Panel then transferred similar cases from different districts to<br />
the MDL for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.<br />
On December 13, 2004, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. (“Franklin<br />
Distributors”) (the principal underwriter of shares of the Franklin<br />
Templeton mutual funds) and Franklin Advisers reached an agreement<br />
with the SEC, resolving the issues resulting from the SEC’s investigation<br />
concerning marketing support payments to securities dealers who sell<br />
fund shares. In connection with that agreement, in which Franklin Advisers<br />
and Franklin Distributors neither admitted nor denied any of the<br />
findings contained therein, they agreed to pay the funds a penalty of<br />
$20 million and disgorgement of $1 (one dollar), in accordance with a<br />
168 Management of the Trust EQ Advisors Trust