13.02.2014 Views

PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young

PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young

PERF RMANCE 04 - The Performance Portal - Ernst & Young

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Boundary-spanning and helpseeking<br />

behaviors<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea of building a “connected<br />

enterprise“ seems a commonsense<br />

goal. <strong>The</strong> study of connectivity in large<br />

organizations follows a long tradition of<br />

academic and management scholarship. In<br />

his landmark 1973 article, “<strong>The</strong> strength<br />

of weak ties,” sociologist Mark Granovetter<br />

observed the extent to which bi-directional<br />

communication taking place between two<br />

colleagues is indicative of the strength of<br />

their social ties to one another. He argued<br />

that weak ties, represented by infrequent<br />

interactions among peers, had significant<br />

value for organizations as they formed a<br />

channel for the exchange of information.<br />

Granovetter linked weak ties directly to<br />

cohesion among peers and saw the analysis<br />

of social ties as a way to highlight valueproducing<br />

relations between groups.<br />

In his 1992 book Structural holes: <strong>The</strong><br />

social structure of competition, theorist<br />

Ronald S. Burt argued that two people<br />

who provide novel and non-redundant<br />

information in a social structure represent<br />

holes in the social network — and that<br />

the spanning of these structural holes<br />

provides the mechanism relating weak<br />

ties to positive outcomes. In Burt’s theory,<br />

“<strong>The</strong> value a manager adds to a firm<br />

is his or her ability to coordinate other<br />

people: identifying opportunities to add<br />

value within an organization and getting<br />

the right people together to develop the<br />

opportunities. Knowing who, when, and<br />

how to coordinate is a function of the<br />

manager's network of contacts within<br />

and beyond the firm” (1997). Thus, the<br />

value of employees within an organization<br />

largely lies in the contacts that they<br />

develop over time.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se well-functioning ties can translate<br />

into more efficient operations via improved<br />

information flows; one clear example of<br />

which can be found in “help-seeking”<br />

behaviors within the enterprise.<br />

In his 2010 book Enterprise 2.0,<br />

MIT research scientist Andrew McAfee<br />

describes an employee at a large<br />

firm, searching for someone who can<br />

do the following:<br />

“. . . keep her from reinventing the wheel,<br />

answer her pressing questions, point her<br />

to exactly the right resource, tell her about<br />

a really good vendor or consultant, let her<br />

know that they were working on a similar<br />

problem and had made some encouraging<br />

progress, or perform any of the other<br />

scores of helpful activities that flow from a<br />

well-functioning tie.” (McAfee 2010)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!