Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

NO . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXA S IN RE MARK A . JACOBS, M.D., DEBRA. C. GUNN, M.D . , AND OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P .A . Relators . Original Proceeding Arising Out of th e Probate Court Number Two, Harris County, Texa s Cause No . 352,923-40 1 (Hon. Mike Wood ) APPENDIX TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMU S In support of the Petition, Relators submit this Appendix, in compliance with Rul e 52 .3(j) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure : Tab A : Affidavit of Diana L. Faust (November 10, 2009 ) Tab B : Order Regarding Defendants Mark Jacobs, M .D.'s, Defendan t Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P .A.'s, and Debra Clark Gunn, M .D .'s Special Exceptions to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Petition, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Net Worth Discovery, an d Defendants Mark Jacobs, M .D .'s, Debra Clark Gunn, M .D.'s an d Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P .A .'s Motion for Protection Concerning Net Worth Discovery (January 23, 2009) Tab C : Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel the Deposition o f Mark Jacobs, M .D., with Subpoena Duces Tecum, Defendant Mark A . Jacobs, M .D .'s Motion for Protective Order, Motions fo r Sanctions, and Motion to Quash and Objections to Plaintiffs' Notic e of Intention to Take Deposition on Written Questions Propounded on Verizon Wireless (January 23, 2009 ) Tab D : Order Clarifying Court's Orders Regarding the Discoverability o f Net Worth Information (January 30, 2009 ) 18
Tab E : Tab F : Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Petition Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Petitio n Tab G: Majority and Concur ring Opinions issued October 20, 2009 in Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas ; In Re Mark A . Jacobs, M.D., Debra C. Gunn, M.D., and Obstetrical Gynecologica l Associates, P.A., Relators, No . 14-09-00123-CV, 2009 Tex . App . LEXIS 8112 (Tex . App .-Houston [14 t" Dist.] 2009, orig . proceeding ) Tab H : Tab I : Jurisdictions Requiring More than Mere Allegations to Discover Ne t Worth Information Chronology of Legislature's and Courts' Changes to Recovery and Availability of Punitive Damages Since Circa 198 8 D/752315 .10 19
Page 1 and 2: IMMEDIATE TEMPORARY RELIEF REQUESTE
Page 3 and 4: Barbara A . Hilburn Divya R . Chund
Page 5 and 6: 3. Texas Legislature's Dramatic Res
Page 7 and 8: Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck,
Page 9 and 10: NO . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXA S
Page 11 and 12: I . STATEMENT OFTHECASE Nature of t
Page 13 and 14: This Court also has jurisdiction ov
Page 15 and 16: of Intention to Take Deposition on
Page 17 and 18: C . Petition for Writ of Mandamus t
Page 19 and 20: introduce evidence of a defendant's
Page 21 and 22: Texas courts have made clear that m
Page 23 and 24: lender in the past two years and pr
Page 25 and 26: strict statutory scheme, and requir
Page 27 and 28: jury's verdict be unanimous , as to
Page 29 and 30: (1 996). Under either, or under a m
Page 31 and 32: Respectfully submitted , COOPER & S
Page 37 and 38: STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALL
Page 40 and 41: Sep.24 . 1OvB' 10 :13AM 2 322 P. 3/
Page 43 and 44: $~.. 24. gi n 10 : 14At 2 5 2 F. 6/
Page 46 and 47: 235095 , PROBATE COURT 42 pl~ - Cau
Page 49 and 50: 09/05/2e08 15:33 7132271121 THE KLE
Page 51 and 52: 09/05/2008 15 : 33 7132271121 THE K
Page 53 and 54: 09/05/2608 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 55 and 56: 03/05/2@@B 15 :33 7132271121 IHE KL
Page 57 and 58: 09/05/2008 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 59 and 60: 05/05/2008 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 61 and 62: Lib/ 2J d (laaari1,41 IHE KLEIN LAW
Page 63: l='i 11b/2(IE;3m 1b : ;3 :3 /13'22/
Page 66 and 67: I . DISCOVERY CONTROL PLA N Pursuan
Page 68 and 69: Defendants Gunn and Jacobs . The bu
Page 70 and 71: 1. Failing to provide appropriate a
Page 72 and 73: Each of the above acts and/or omiss
Page 74 and 75: An act or omission by Debra C . Gun
Page 76 and 77: B. Defendant Debra Clark Gunn, M.D.
Page 78 and 79: the course and scope of their emplo
Page 80 and 81: XII . CONDITIONS PRECEDEN T Plainti
Page 82: CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE I hereby cert
Page 85 and 86:
I Real parties in interest, Andre M
Page 87 and 88:
In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S .W.3
Page 89 and 90:
law, a party seeking discovery of n
Page 91 and 92:
Id. The McCoys allege Dr. Jacobs an
Page 93 and 94:
S .W.3d at 897 (quoting Roark v. Al
Page 95 and 96:
In re CSX Corp., 124 S .W.3d at 153
Page 97 and 98:
harrassment ." Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Page 99 and 100:
and the McCoys have not pleaded suf
Page 101 and 102:
The specific controversy over net-w
Page 103 and 104:
In 1987, the Texas Legislature bega
Page 105 and 106:
of litigants to seek and recover ex
Page 107 and 108:
This sort of invasive discovery gen
Page 109 and 110:
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT IN RE MARIA
Page 111 and 112:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112, ''' Page
Page 113 and 114:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112 , Page 5
Page 115 and 116:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112, Page 7 a
Page 117 and 118:
2009 Tex, App . LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 119 and 120:
2009 Tex . App. LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 121 and 122:
2009 Tex. App . LEX1S 8112, '' Page
Page 123 and 124:
2009 Tex . App. LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 125 and 126:
2009 Tex, App. LEXIS 8112 , Page 1
Page 128 and 129:
JURISDICTIONS REQUIRINGMORETHANMERE
Page 130 and 131:
CASE OR STATUTE REQUIREMENT 102(1)(
Page 133 and 134:
CHRONOLOGYOFLEGISLATURE'SANDCOURT'S
Page 135:
DATE CASE NAME OR STATUTE CHANG E s
show all

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?