Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

235095 , PROBATE COURT 42 pl~ - Cause Number: 352,923-40 1 IN RE: GUARDIANSHIP O F THE PERSON AND ESTATE O F SHANNON MILES MCCOY, AN INCAPACITATED PERSON § ANDRE Iv] CCOY, INDIVIDUALLY § AND AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN § OF SHANNON MILES MCCOY, § AN INCAPACITATED PERSON § § VS § § WOMAN'S HOSPITAL OF § TEXAS, INC .; CHCA WOMAN'S § HOSPITAL, L.P. dfbla WOMAN'S § HOSPITAL OF TEXAS ; HOUSTON § WOIvIAN'S HOSPITAL § PARTNER, L,L .C . ; § DEBRA C. GUNN, M .D. ; § MARK A . JACOBS, M .D. ; § OBSTETRICAL AND § GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P .A . ; § AND, JAM ES A . COLLINS, M.D . § § § § IN THE PROBATE COURT AT LAW NUMBER TWO (2) O F HARRIS COUNTY, TEXA S ORDERCLARIFYING COURT'SORDERS REGARDINGTHE DISCOVERABILITY OF NET WORTH INFORMATIO N The Court heard Defendants' Motion to Clarify the Court 's Orders Regarding the Discoverab>lity of Net Worth Information, and having considered the same, the pleading s on file, and hearing arguments of counsel, if any, orders the following : It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are to produc e net worth information in accordance with the Order regarding Defendants' Specia l Exceptions to Plaintiffs' Third Amended Petition, Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Ne t Worth Discovery, and Defendants ' Motion for Protection Concerning Net Worth Discovery by F¢Nrtz l , 2009 . A CERTtFIED COPY JAN 3 0 2009 ATTEST: BEVERLY B. KAUFMAN, County Cler k a rriSC tc tftit3;Texa5 4 " '- r Deputy
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED t t Plaintiffs are permitted to question D . Debra C. Gunn)iid Dr . Mark A. Jacobs at Aar +is ;RD worth info[ [nation epo.iition regarding their net t-ckt-eeaua.t.ta Cr*5iq R4T from videomping any depositio n SIGNED this ' 11 , day of )1''1"041 , 2009. A CERTIFIED COP Y ATTEST: JAN 3 02009 BEVERLY D . KAUFMAN, County Cler k Harris County, Texas_ ,__. DCpUty
Page 1 and 2: IMMEDIATE TEMPORARY RELIEF REQUESTE
Page 3 and 4: Barbara A . Hilburn Divya R . Chund
Page 5 and 6: 3. Texas Legislature's Dramatic Res
Page 7 and 8: Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck,
Page 9 and 10: NO . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXA S
Page 11 and 12: I . STATEMENT OFTHECASE Nature of t
Page 13 and 14: This Court also has jurisdiction ov
Page 15 and 16: of Intention to Take Deposition on
Page 17 and 18: C . Petition for Writ of Mandamus t
Page 19 and 20: introduce evidence of a defendant's
Page 21 and 22: Texas courts have made clear that m
Page 23 and 24: lender in the past two years and pr
Page 25 and 26: strict statutory scheme, and requir
Page 27 and 28: jury's verdict be unanimous , as to
Page 29 and 30: (1 996). Under either, or under a m
Page 31 and 32: Respectfully submitted , COOPER & S
Page 34 and 35: NO . IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXA S
Page 37 and 38: STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF DALL
Page 40 and 41: Sep.24 . 1OvB' 10 :13AM 2 322 P. 3/
Page 43 and 44: $~.. 24. gi n 10 : 14At 2 5 2 F. 6/
Page 49 and 50: 09/05/2e08 15:33 7132271121 THE KLE
Page 51 and 52: 09/05/2008 15 : 33 7132271121 THE K
Page 53 and 54: 09/05/2608 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 55 and 56: 03/05/2@@B 15 :33 7132271121 IHE KL
Page 57 and 58: 09/05/2008 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 59 and 60: 05/05/2008 15 :33 7132271121 THE KL
Page 61 and 62: Lib/ 2J d (laaari1,41 IHE KLEIN LAW
Page 63: l='i 11b/2(IE;3m 1b : ;3 :3 /13'22/
Page 66 and 67: I . DISCOVERY CONTROL PLA N Pursuan
Page 68 and 69: Defendants Gunn and Jacobs . The bu
Page 70 and 71: 1. Failing to provide appropriate a
Page 72 and 73: Each of the above acts and/or omiss
Page 74 and 75: An act or omission by Debra C . Gun
Page 76 and 77: B. Defendant Debra Clark Gunn, M.D.
Page 78 and 79: the course and scope of their emplo
Page 80 and 81: XII . CONDITIONS PRECEDEN T Plainti
Page 82: CERTIFICATE OFSERVICE I hereby cert
Page 85 and 86: I Real parties in interest, Andre M
Page 87 and 88: In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S .W.3
Page 89 and 90: law, a party seeking discovery of n
Page 91 and 92: Id. The McCoys allege Dr. Jacobs an
Page 93 and 94: S .W.3d at 897 (quoting Roark v. Al
Page 95 and 96:
In re CSX Corp., 124 S .W.3d at 153
Page 97 and 98:
harrassment ." Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Page 99 and 100:
and the McCoys have not pleaded suf
Page 101 and 102:
The specific controversy over net-w
Page 103 and 104:
In 1987, the Texas Legislature bega
Page 105 and 106:
of litigants to seek and recover ex
Page 107 and 108:
This sort of invasive discovery gen
Page 109 and 110:
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT IN RE MARIA
Page 111 and 112:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112, ''' Page
Page 113 and 114:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112 , Page 5
Page 115 and 116:
2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 8112, Page 7 a
Page 117 and 118:
2009 Tex, App . LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 119 and 120:
2009 Tex . App. LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 121 and 122:
2009 Tex. App . LEX1S 8112, '' Page
Page 123 and 124:
2009 Tex . App. LEXIS 8112, * Page
Page 125 and 126:
2009 Tex, App. LEXIS 8112 , Page 1
Page 128 and 129:
JURISDICTIONS REQUIRINGMORETHANMERE
Page 130 and 131:
CASE OR STATUTE REQUIREMENT 102(1)(
Page 133 and 134:
CHRONOLOGYOFLEGISLATURE'SANDCOURT'S
Page 135:
DATE CASE NAME OR STATUTE CHANG E s
show all

Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?