27.02.2014 Views

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1. Chemical stabilization of bulk-like EuO directly on silicon 87<br />

are depicted in Fig. 5.1. In stoichiometric EuO (i), M(T ) roughly follows a Brillouin function,<br />

as expected for a Heisenberg ferromagnet with spin angular momentum S = 7/2. 18 We can<br />

observe a magnetic saturation moment of M S = 6.7µ B , close to the bulk value of 7µ B per Eu 2+<br />

as expected for a 4f 7 : 8 S7/2 system. Likewise, the normalized M(H) characteristics taken at<br />

2 K (see inset of Fig. 5.1) displays a clear square-like ferromagnetic hysteresis with a coercive<br />

field of H c ≈ 100 Oe of the (i) stoichiometric EuO/Si (001) heterostructure. This magnitude<br />

of coercive field is characteristic for polycrystalline EuO.<br />

The complementary EuO/Si heterostructure (ii) comprising oxygen-rich EuO, in contrast,<br />

reveals an M(T ) curve in Fig. 5.1 which is almost completely suppressed. Here, a reduced<br />

magnetic saturation moment M S = 1.5µ B is detected at 2 K, caused by a dominant fraction of<br />

paramagnetic Eu 3+ cations in Eu 3 O 4 or Eu 2 O 3 phases, which instantly form under any oxygen<br />

excess. This mainly paramagnetic behavior is also reflected in the M(H) curve (inset) of<br />

oxygen-rich EuO, in which a hysteretic behavior of remaining EuO is hardly identified.<br />

The complete alteration of the magnetic behavior due to an oxygen partial pressure change<br />

of only 2 × 10 −9 Torr underlines that the oxygen supply is an extremely important parameter<br />

during EuO synthesis, in order to obtain EuO/Si structures of stoichiometric type (i) instead<br />

of Eu 1 O 1+x (ii). <br />

HAXPES: Analysis of the Eu 4f valence level<br />

Eu 3d<br />

Eu 4f<br />

e −<br />

e − z EuO = 50..95 Å<br />

Eu 4d<br />

e −<br />

Eu 4s<br />

e −<br />

photoelectron<br />

yield<br />

Al<br />

Figure 5.2.: Photoemission information<br />

depths z, as calculated<br />

for the particular EuO/Si heterostructures<br />

and core-levels<br />

investigated in this study<br />

under hard X-ray excitation of<br />

hν = 4.2 keV.<br />

hard x-ray<br />

excitation<br />

10.7 nm<br />

19 nm<br />

z<br />

d EuO = 45 Å<br />

18 nm<br />

17 nm<br />

information depth calculated<br />

for electrons from Eu orbitals<br />

Si<br />

(100)<br />

EuO<br />

A straightforward analysis of the EuO chemical state is feasible by the analysis of the harddray<br />

photoemission spectra of the Eu 4f orbital. Due to the highly localized character of the<br />

4f valence band with an energy dispersion limited to 0.3 eV, 41,171 hybridization with other<br />

ligand states is weak and photoemission from the deeper bound oxygen 2p valence band becomes<br />

well distinguishable, as indicated † by a recent LDA+U band structure of EuO 41 . In<br />

contrast to photoemission spectroscopy of deep core-levels, final state screening effects of the<br />

4f photo-hole are negligible here. Depending on the Eu 1 O 1+x stoichiometry, Eu cations will<br />

be either in a divalent Eu 2+ initial state with half-filled 4d 10 4f 7 shell and a ferromagnetic<br />

moment of 7µ B , or exist as trivalent Eu 3+ occupying a 4d 10 4f 6 level, which is chemically<br />

One may want to compare this oxygen paramater with the synthesis of stoichiometric EuO on cubic oxides<br />

in Ch. 4.1 on p. 60.<br />

† as depicted in Fig. 2.4 on p. 10.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!