27.02.2014 Views

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

Text anzeigen (PDF) - Universität Duisburg-Essen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level photoemission 29<br />

2.5. Magnetic circular dichroism in core-level photoemission<br />

Dichroism is derived from Greek and means the “effect of two colors”, originally used for<br />

natural materials showing two colors due to surface effects. The magnetic circular dichroism<br />

(MCD) uses circularly polarized light for excitation and is caused by a directional symmetry<br />

breaking. This can be a magnetic order in the solid. In contrast to itinerant ferromagnets<br />

(e. g. Fe), the “magnetic” open shell in EuO is localized and treated as a core-level in terms<br />

of photoemission spectroscopy. The well-understood core-level photoemission and the completely<br />

available MCD theory render the MCD effect in Eu core-level photoemission an ideal<br />

tool for investigations of tunable effects on the magnetic interaction in EuO thin films: biaxial<br />

strain, stoichiometry, etc. By using hard X-ray photoemission, the MCD effect can be<br />

analyzed at a selected information depth down to 20 nm, thus providing insight into buried<br />

magnetic layers and interfaces.<br />

In this section, we first introduce the basic theory of MCD in photoemission. We proceed<br />

with a simple example: MCD in 2p core-level photoemission. Finally, coupling schemes of<br />

the angular momenta of the Eu photoemission final states are discussed, as a first step for a<br />

future determination of the line strengths in MCD of Eu core-level photoemission spectra.<br />

2.5.1. Atomic multiplet theory including MCD<br />

In order to understand the MCD effect in photoemission, we need to analyze the photoemission<br />

process excited by circularly polarized light, thus including the magnetic quantum<br />

number M. During the photoemission process, an electron from a core-level with w electrons<br />

of orbital momentum l is excited into a free electron state |ɛl ′ 〉 with an orbital momentum l ′<br />

and energy ɛ. Finally, w − 1 electrons are left in the final state configuration |l w−1 〉:<br />

∣<br />

∣l w〉<br />

}{{}<br />

|J,M〉<br />

∆J,∆M<br />

−→ ∣ ∣l w−1 ; ɛl ′〉 . (2.27)<br />

}{{}<br />

|J ′ ,M ′ 〉<br />

The final states |J ′ , M ′ 〉 emerge via the dipole selection rules, according to:<br />

∆J = 0, ±1 ∆M = 0, ±1. (2.28)<br />

The photoemission spectrum is composed of the core final states |l w−1 〉 and transferred to<br />

the detector by the photoelectron |ɛl ′ 〉. In order to quantify the MCD effect, a theoretical<br />

prediction of photoemission line strengths is desirable. A formal description of the MCD in<br />

core-level photoemission considers two interactions, 104 (i) intra-atomic exchange coupling,<br />

which connects core-level spins with the magnetically aligned spins of an open shell, and (ii)<br />

the spin–orbit interaction, which couples the orbital “magnetic” momentum of the circularly<br />

polarized photon to the system of magnetically aligned spins of the sample. We discuss<br />

the analytical derivation, as published in Starke (2000), 105,106 in a shortened form in the<br />

following.<br />

First, the total photoemission intensity is described by Fermi’s golden rule, similar to corelevel<br />

photoemission with unpolarized light (Ch. 2.4). However, for an MCD experiment, we<br />

Herein, ∆J = 0 is only possible if J 0, due to the enforced momentum change of the photohole l w−1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!