05.03.2014 Views

Certification procedure

Certification procedure

Certification procedure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Certification</strong> Procedure<br />

Dr. Andrew McMATH<br />

<strong>Certification</strong> of Substances Division,<br />

EDQM<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Summary<br />

• Place of <strong>Certification</strong> as a regulatory tool<br />

• Comparison of CEP & ASMF<br />

• How it works<br />

• How to read & use a CEP<br />

• Key figures<br />

• Recent developments<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Regulatory background<br />

Active substances in marketing applications :<br />

Directive 2003/63/EC and the various quality<br />

guidelines give options on how to fulfil the same<br />

basic requirements.<br />

The information required is the same regardless of the<br />

route selected (CEP or ASMF or Marketing<br />

Application)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


NfG CHMP/QWP/297/97 rev. 1 corr<br />

«Summary of requirements for active substances<br />

in the quality part of the dossier»<br />

This document describes how to communicate the<br />

information on the active substance (API) to authorities in<br />

Europe.<br />

It gives three choices:<br />

2.1 Certificate of suitability<br />

2.2 Active Substance Master File (ASMF)<br />

2.3 Full details of manufacture<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


NfG CHMP/QWP/297/97 rev. 1 corr<br />

“Summary of requirements for active substances<br />

in the quality part of the dossier”<br />

2.1 Certificate of suitability<br />

Since this <strong>procedure</strong> requires a Ph. Eur. monograph, it is used for<br />

existing substances and the guideline states : “ where applicable,<br />

option 2.1 has the advantage of generally avoiding any<br />

subsequent reassessment ”<br />

2.2 Active substance Master File (ASMF)<br />

2.3 Full details of manufacture in licence application<br />

Since these <strong>procedure</strong>s do not require a Ph. Eur. monograph they<br />

can be used for new substances;<br />

but may also be used for existing substances.<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Scope:<br />

•CEP: pharmacopoeial substances only,<br />

-> active subst. or excipient<br />

• ASMF : active substances only,<br />

-> new or pharmacopoeial<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Specificity of ASMF:<br />

• Full dossier sent by API manufacturer to National Authorities<br />

• Applicant’s part sent by API manufacturer to MA applicant or<br />

holder of medicinal Product<br />

• Letter of access (to be sent by API manufacturer)<br />

• Assessment of ASMF by each national authority in the<br />

context of assessing a specific marketing authorisation<br />

application or variation for medicinal products<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Specificity of CEP <strong>procedure</strong>:<br />

• Full dossier sent directly by manufacturer to EDQM<br />

• Single evaluation centralised at EDQM<br />

• By assessors nominated by national authorities /<br />

<strong>Certification</strong> Steering Committee<br />

• Independent from marketing applications of medicinal<br />

products<br />

• Certificate including annexes (additional tests to be<br />

performed) granted to manufacturer who supplies a copy<br />

of it to its users<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Advantages of the CEP<br />

Provides:<br />

• Easier management of RA documentation for API<br />

manufacturer (no open part)<br />

• Savings of time and resources<br />

• Easier management of MAA - replaces main part of<br />

3.2.S<br />

• CEP accepted in all Ph. Eur. Member states (36) +<br />

others (eg. Canada (MoU 03/2007), Australia,<br />

Morocco, New Zealand etc.)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Useful background<br />

• Resolution AP-CSP(07) 1 of the CoE:<br />

Describes the process for the <strong>Certification</strong><br />

<strong>procedure</strong><br />

• Content of the (CEP) dossier<br />

PA/PH/CEP (04) 1, 4R<br />

Both available on EDQM website<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Useful background<br />

• Notes for guidance (ICH + CHMP/CVMP) apply, in<br />

particular:<br />

• Impurities testing (ICH Q3A + Ph. Eur. General Monograph 2034,<br />

Substances for Pharmaceutical Use)<br />

• Solvents (ICH Q3C = Ph. Eur. general text 5.4 )<br />

• Specifications limits for residues of metal catalysts or metal<br />

reagents (CHMP/SWP)<br />

• Limits of genotoxic impurities (CHMP-SWP)<br />

• (Stability testing (ICH Q1 + CHMP guidelines for existing<br />

substances.)<br />

• GMP (ICH Q7, Annex 1 to EU GMP)<br />

• TSE (CPMP/CVMP guideline = PhEur general text 5.2.8)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Scope of the <strong>Certification</strong> <strong>procedure</strong><br />

- Substances described in monographs in the Ph. Eur.:<br />

Active substances, excipients, herbal drugs / herbal<br />

preparations “Chemical” CEP<br />

- Products with risk of TSE (SM, intermediates, reagents,..) <br />

“TSE “CEP<br />

- Substances described in monographs in the Ph. Eur.and<br />

with risk of TSE “Double “CEP<br />

Open to any manufacturer<br />

regardless of geographical<br />

origin<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Out of Scope of the <strong>Certification</strong><br />

<strong>procedure</strong><br />

- Substances not included in Ph. Eur.<br />

- Biologicals<br />

- Human tissues derivatives, blood derivatives,<br />

vaccines<br />

- Finished products<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


<strong>Certification</strong>: organisation<br />

• Steering Committee<br />

• Technical Advisory Boards (TAB)<br />

Chemical<br />

TSE<br />

Herbals<br />

• Assessors<br />

• EDQM <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Steering Committee<br />

• Representatives of main regulatory bodies (14 members<br />

from EMA WP, EU Commission, Ph. Eur Commission,<br />

Non-EU licensing authorities,...)<br />

• Monitoring <strong>Certification</strong> <strong>procedure</strong><br />

• Appointment of assessors<br />

• Appointment of Technical Advisory Boards (TABs) and<br />

their Chairperson<br />

• Policy adoption<br />

• Review and comment on issues raised by TABs<br />

• Co-ordination of issues between the represented parties<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Technical advisory boards (TAB)<br />

• Consists of experienced assessors involved in the CEP<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> for a period of time<br />

Role:<br />

• To assist assessors in case of doubt or disagreement<br />

• To prepare technical guidance<br />

• To identify technical/scientific problems and seek advice<br />

for SC<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Assessors and <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

A<br />

• Assessors appointed by agencies<br />

(about 80 from 16 countries)<br />

– Role : evaluation of dossiers<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

8<br />

10<br />

5 2<br />

7<br />

5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5 4<br />

19<br />

B<br />

CH<br />

CND<br />

D<br />

DK<br />

E<br />

F<br />

IE<br />

IT<br />

H<br />

NL<br />

P<br />

UK<br />

S<br />

SF<br />

• <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

(EDQM scientific and administrative staff )<br />

– Role : execution of the <strong>procedure</strong> and co-ordination<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Content of the dossier:<br />

For details Nathalie Vicente<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How it works:<br />

Application<br />

Up-dating :<br />

- at any change (minor/major)<br />

- After 5 years (renewal)<br />

Request for<br />

inspection<br />

Revision of<br />

monograph<br />

Transfer to EDQM<br />

experts group<br />

Validation<br />

Evaluation (2 assessors)<br />

+ TAB if necessary<br />

CEP granted<br />

Possibility<br />

of hearing<br />

Request for add info<br />

refusal<br />

Info of<br />

licensing auth.<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How long does it take?<br />

• Timeframes:<br />

– Applicant notified by EDQM on the assessment<br />

conclusion within 5 months of receipt of new dossier,<br />

once validated<br />

– Responses from applicant expected within 6 months<br />

for original demand<br />

– Responses assessed within 4 months<br />

NB. Since 1/09/2008: strict <strong>procedure</strong> applied - only one<br />

request for additional information<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


HOW TO READ A CEP<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The certificate of suitability, chemical:<br />

• Certifies that the quality of a given substance can<br />

be suitably controlled by the Ph.Eur. monograph -<br />

with additional tests if necessary (stated on the<br />

CEP).<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that a batch or batches of the<br />

substance complies with the Pharmacopoeia<br />

monograph.<br />

• It IS NOT a GMP certificate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The CEP, TSE :<br />

• Certifies that the substance complies with the<br />

EMEA NfG on minimising the TSE risk<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that the quality of the<br />

substance can be suitably controlled by the Ph.Eur.<br />

monograph<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that a batch of the substance<br />

complies with the monograph<br />

• It IS NOT a GMP certificate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


All CEPs specify:<br />

• Unique Reference number<br />

(e.g. R0-CEP 2000-001-Rev01)<br />

• Title: clear definition of the substance<br />

+ grade when requested (eg. micronised, sterile,…)<br />

• Holder + manufacturing site(s)<br />

• Monograph(s) concerned<br />

• Starting validity date<br />

• Line numbering and annex details if appropriate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And as necessary, chemical CEPs:<br />

• Additional impurities/Solvents/Catalysts<br />

– With limits and methods<br />

• Re-test period<br />

– With storage conditions + container<br />

• Specs (limit + test) for a specific grade<br />

• Tests of the monograph which can be omitted<br />

• Use or non-use of materials of animal origin<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And if for a sterile material:<br />

• Description of sterilisation method and<br />

container/closure<br />

• Statement that the validation of the sterilisation has<br />

been evaluated<br />

NB: the information on the sterilisation process and its<br />

validation needs to be submitted separately in the<br />

marketing authorisation dossier<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And for a TSE certificate:<br />

• Country(ies) of origin of animals<br />

• Animal and nature of tissue(s) used<br />

• Manufacturing process applied (when relevant,<br />

e.g. gelatins)<br />

• Quality assurance system applied<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The CEP looks like:<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How to use a CEP:<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


What should be addressed at the level<br />

of the MAA ?<br />

• Stability if no re-test period mentioned on the CEP<br />

• All data relating to physico-chemical characteristics<br />

(e.g. particle size) if no grade claimed<br />

• Assessment is performed taking into account the<br />

general use of the substance. Specific uses should<br />

be addressed at the level of the marketing<br />

authorisation application<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


KEY FIGURES<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Certificates of Suitability<br />

• > 4000 applications since <strong>procedure</strong> launched<br />

• ~ 2500 valid certificates<br />

• > 760 substance monographs involved<br />

• …<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Certificates of Suitability<br />

… > 560 manufacturers from 43 countries<br />

Repartition of manufacturing sites covered by CEPs (2008)<br />

America<br />

15%<br />

Middle East<br />

1% Africa<br />

Pacific zone<br />

1%<br />

4%<br />

Europe<br />

41%<br />

Asia<br />

38%<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

1. New <strong>procedure</strong> for the assessment of “sister files”<br />

when a manufacturer has been granted a CEP for a<br />

substance and where they apply for a second CEP for the<br />

same substance to cover an alternative process, generally<br />

because the existing one cannot cover the new<br />

process/conditions,<br />

fast track <strong>procedure</strong> focusing the evaluation on the<br />

variations compared to the approved CEP dossier.<br />

(see EDQM web-site PA/PH/CEP (09) 141).<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

2. Revision of general monograph 2034 Substances for<br />

Pharmaceutical Use:<br />

- New limits for synthetic peptides:<br />

- Updated limits for substance for vet. use only<br />

- Published in Supplement 6.5<br />

- Implemented on 1 July 2009<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

3. Substances extracted from animal tissues:<br />

(heparin, enoxaparin, …), the t EDQM no longer accepts<br />

any new application for a CEP for biological substances.<br />

See <strong>Certification</strong> website / New Applications<br />

- A list of these biological products is available on the<br />

CMD(h) web-sitehttp://www.hma.eu/uploads/media/070618.pdf<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


<strong>Certification</strong>: benefits<br />

• Single & harmonised assessment<br />

• Replaces Active Substance Master File<br />

• Savings of time and resources<br />

• Updating of monographs (impurities)<br />

• Revision of monographs (new or replacement test<br />

methods)<br />

• CEPs are recognised in Europe and beyond<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Thank you ! ☺<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!