05.03.2014 Views

Certification procedure

Certification procedure

Certification procedure

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Certification</strong> Procedure<br />

Dr. Andrew McMATH<br />

<strong>Certification</strong> of Substances Division,<br />

EDQM<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Summary<br />

• Place of <strong>Certification</strong> as a regulatory tool<br />

• Comparison of CEP & ASMF<br />

• How it works<br />

• How to read & use a CEP<br />

• Key figures<br />

• Recent developments<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Regulatory background<br />

Active substances in marketing applications :<br />

Directive 2003/63/EC and the various quality<br />

guidelines give options on how to fulfil the same<br />

basic requirements.<br />

The information required is the same regardless of the<br />

route selected (CEP or ASMF or Marketing<br />

Application)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


NfG CHMP/QWP/297/97 rev. 1 corr<br />

«Summary of requirements for active substances<br />

in the quality part of the dossier»<br />

This document describes how to communicate the<br />

information on the active substance (API) to authorities in<br />

Europe.<br />

It gives three choices:<br />

2.1 Certificate of suitability<br />

2.2 Active Substance Master File (ASMF)<br />

2.3 Full details of manufacture<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


NfG CHMP/QWP/297/97 rev. 1 corr<br />

“Summary of requirements for active substances<br />

in the quality part of the dossier”<br />

2.1 Certificate of suitability<br />

Since this <strong>procedure</strong> requires a Ph. Eur. monograph, it is used for<br />

existing substances and the guideline states : “ where applicable,<br />

option 2.1 has the advantage of generally avoiding any<br />

subsequent reassessment ”<br />

2.2 Active substance Master File (ASMF)<br />

2.3 Full details of manufacture in licence application<br />

Since these <strong>procedure</strong>s do not require a Ph. Eur. monograph they<br />

can be used for new substances;<br />

but may also be used for existing substances.<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Scope:<br />

•CEP: pharmacopoeial substances only,<br />

-> active subst. or excipient<br />

• ASMF : active substances only,<br />

-> new or pharmacopoeial<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Specificity of ASMF:<br />

• Full dossier sent by API manufacturer to National Authorities<br />

• Applicant’s part sent by API manufacturer to MA applicant or<br />

holder of medicinal Product<br />

• Letter of access (to be sent by API manufacturer)<br />

• Assessment of ASMF by each national authority in the<br />

context of assessing a specific marketing authorisation<br />

application or variation for medicinal products<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Differences between CEP & ASMF<br />

- Specificity of CEP <strong>procedure</strong>:<br />

• Full dossier sent directly by manufacturer to EDQM<br />

• Single evaluation centralised at EDQM<br />

• By assessors nominated by national authorities /<br />

<strong>Certification</strong> Steering Committee<br />

• Independent from marketing applications of medicinal<br />

products<br />

• Certificate including annexes (additional tests to be<br />

performed) granted to manufacturer who supplies a copy<br />

of it to its users<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Advantages of the CEP<br />

Provides:<br />

• Easier management of RA documentation for API<br />

manufacturer (no open part)<br />

• Savings of time and resources<br />

• Easier management of MAA - replaces main part of<br />

3.2.S<br />

• CEP accepted in all Ph. Eur. Member states (36) +<br />

others (eg. Canada (MoU 03/2007), Australia,<br />

Morocco, New Zealand etc.)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Useful background<br />

• Resolution AP-CSP(07) 1 of the CoE:<br />

Describes the process for the <strong>Certification</strong><br />

<strong>procedure</strong><br />

• Content of the (CEP) dossier<br />

PA/PH/CEP (04) 1, 4R<br />

Both available on EDQM website<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Useful background<br />

• Notes for guidance (ICH + CHMP/CVMP) apply, in<br />

particular:<br />

• Impurities testing (ICH Q3A + Ph. Eur. General Monograph 2034,<br />

Substances for Pharmaceutical Use)<br />

• Solvents (ICH Q3C = Ph. Eur. general text 5.4 )<br />

• Specifications limits for residues of metal catalysts or metal<br />

reagents (CHMP/SWP)<br />

• Limits of genotoxic impurities (CHMP-SWP)<br />

• (Stability testing (ICH Q1 + CHMP guidelines for existing<br />

substances.)<br />

• GMP (ICH Q7, Annex 1 to EU GMP)<br />

• TSE (CPMP/CVMP guideline = PhEur general text 5.2.8)<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Scope of the <strong>Certification</strong> <strong>procedure</strong><br />

- Substances described in monographs in the Ph. Eur.:<br />

Active substances, excipients, herbal drugs / herbal<br />

preparations “Chemical” CEP<br />

- Products with risk of TSE (SM, intermediates, reagents,..) <br />

“TSE “CEP<br />

- Substances described in monographs in the Ph. Eur.and<br />

with risk of TSE “Double “CEP<br />

Open to any manufacturer<br />

regardless of geographical<br />

origin<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Out of Scope of the <strong>Certification</strong><br />

<strong>procedure</strong><br />

- Substances not included in Ph. Eur.<br />

- Biologicals<br />

- Human tissues derivatives, blood derivatives,<br />

vaccines<br />

- Finished products<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


<strong>Certification</strong>: organisation<br />

• Steering Committee<br />

• Technical Advisory Boards (TAB)<br />

Chemical<br />

TSE<br />

Herbals<br />

• Assessors<br />

• EDQM <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Steering Committee<br />

• Representatives of main regulatory bodies (14 members<br />

from EMA WP, EU Commission, Ph. Eur Commission,<br />

Non-EU licensing authorities,...)<br />

• Monitoring <strong>Certification</strong> <strong>procedure</strong><br />

• Appointment of assessors<br />

• Appointment of Technical Advisory Boards (TABs) and<br />

their Chairperson<br />

• Policy adoption<br />

• Review and comment on issues raised by TABs<br />

• Co-ordination of issues between the represented parties<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Technical advisory boards (TAB)<br />

• Consists of experienced assessors involved in the CEP<br />

<strong>procedure</strong> for a period of time<br />

Role:<br />

• To assist assessors in case of doubt or disagreement<br />

• To prepare technical guidance<br />

• To identify technical/scientific problems and seek advice<br />

for SC<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Assessors and <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

A<br />

• Assessors appointed by agencies<br />

(about 80 from 16 countries)<br />

– Role : evaluation of dossiers<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

1<br />

5<br />

8<br />

10<br />

5 2<br />

7<br />

5<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5 4<br />

19<br />

B<br />

CH<br />

CND<br />

D<br />

DK<br />

E<br />

F<br />

IE<br />

IT<br />

H<br />

NL<br />

P<br />

UK<br />

S<br />

SF<br />

• <strong>Certification</strong> Division<br />

(EDQM scientific and administrative staff )<br />

– Role : execution of the <strong>procedure</strong> and co-ordination<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Content of the dossier:<br />

For details Nathalie Vicente<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How it works:<br />

Application<br />

Up-dating :<br />

- at any change (minor/major)<br />

- After 5 years (renewal)<br />

Request for<br />

inspection<br />

Revision of<br />

monograph<br />

Transfer to EDQM<br />

experts group<br />

Validation<br />

Evaluation (2 assessors)<br />

+ TAB if necessary<br />

CEP granted<br />

Possibility<br />

of hearing<br />

Request for add info<br />

refusal<br />

Info of<br />

licensing auth.<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How long does it take?<br />

• Timeframes:<br />

– Applicant notified by EDQM on the assessment<br />

conclusion within 5 months of receipt of new dossier,<br />

once validated<br />

– Responses from applicant expected within 6 months<br />

for original demand<br />

– Responses assessed within 4 months<br />

NB. Since 1/09/2008: strict <strong>procedure</strong> applied - only one<br />

request for additional information<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


HOW TO READ A CEP<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The certificate of suitability, chemical:<br />

• Certifies that the quality of a given substance can<br />

be suitably controlled by the Ph.Eur. monograph -<br />

with additional tests if necessary (stated on the<br />

CEP).<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that a batch or batches of the<br />

substance complies with the Pharmacopoeia<br />

monograph.<br />

• It IS NOT a GMP certificate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The CEP, TSE :<br />

• Certifies that the substance complies with the<br />

EMEA NfG on minimising the TSE risk<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that the quality of the<br />

substance can be suitably controlled by the Ph.Eur.<br />

monograph<br />

• It DOES NOT certify that a batch of the substance<br />

complies with the monograph<br />

• It IS NOT a GMP certificate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


All CEPs specify:<br />

• Unique Reference number<br />

(e.g. R0-CEP 2000-001-Rev01)<br />

• Title: clear definition of the substance<br />

+ grade when requested (eg. micronised, sterile,…)<br />

• Holder + manufacturing site(s)<br />

• Monograph(s) concerned<br />

• Starting validity date<br />

• Line numbering and annex details if appropriate<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And as necessary, chemical CEPs:<br />

• Additional impurities/Solvents/Catalysts<br />

– With limits and methods<br />

• Re-test period<br />

– With storage conditions + container<br />

• Specs (limit + test) for a specific grade<br />

• Tests of the monograph which can be omitted<br />

• Use or non-use of materials of animal origin<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And if for a sterile material:<br />

• Description of sterilisation method and<br />

container/closure<br />

• Statement that the validation of the sterilisation has<br />

been evaluated<br />

NB: the information on the sterilisation process and its<br />

validation needs to be submitted separately in the<br />

marketing authorisation dossier<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


And for a TSE certificate:<br />

• Country(ies) of origin of animals<br />

• Animal and nature of tissue(s) used<br />

• Manufacturing process applied (when relevant,<br />

e.g. gelatins)<br />

• Quality assurance system applied<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


The CEP looks like:<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


How to use a CEP:<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


What should be addressed at the level<br />

of the MAA ?<br />

• Stability if no re-test period mentioned on the CEP<br />

• All data relating to physico-chemical characteristics<br />

(e.g. particle size) if no grade claimed<br />

• Assessment is performed taking into account the<br />

general use of the substance. Specific uses should<br />

be addressed at the level of the marketing<br />

authorisation application<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


KEY FIGURES<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Certificates of Suitability<br />

• > 4000 applications since <strong>procedure</strong> launched<br />

• ~ 2500 valid certificates<br />

• > 760 substance monographs involved<br />

• …<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Certificates of Suitability<br />

… > 560 manufacturers from 43 countries<br />

Repartition of manufacturing sites covered by CEPs (2008)<br />

America<br />

15%<br />

Middle East<br />

1% Africa<br />

Pacific zone<br />

1%<br />

4%<br />

Europe<br />

41%<br />

Asia<br />

38%<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


RECENT DEVELOPMENTS<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

1. New <strong>procedure</strong> for the assessment of “sister files”<br />

when a manufacturer has been granted a CEP for a<br />

substance and where they apply for a second CEP for the<br />

same substance to cover an alternative process, generally<br />

because the existing one cannot cover the new<br />

process/conditions,<br />

fast track <strong>procedure</strong> focusing the evaluation on the<br />

variations compared to the approved CEP dossier.<br />

(see EDQM web-site PA/PH/CEP (09) 141).<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

2. Revision of general monograph 2034 Substances for<br />

Pharmaceutical Use:<br />

- New limits for synthetic peptides:<br />

- Updated limits for substance for vet. use only<br />

- Published in Supplement 6.5<br />

- Implemented on 1 July 2009<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Recent developments<br />

3. Substances extracted from animal tissues:<br />

(heparin, enoxaparin, …), the t EDQM no longer accepts<br />

any new application for a CEP for biological substances.<br />

See <strong>Certification</strong> website / New Applications<br />

- A list of these biological products is available on the<br />

CMD(h) web-sitehttp://www.hma.eu/uploads/media/070618.pdf<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


<strong>Certification</strong>: benefits<br />

• Single & harmonised assessment<br />

• Replaces Active Substance Master File<br />

• Savings of time and resources<br />

• Updating of monographs (impurities)<br />

• Revision of monographs (new or replacement test<br />

methods)<br />

• CEPs are recognised in Europe and beyond<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved


Thank you ! ☺<br />

Andrew McMath 29/01/10 ©2010 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!