Governance and Micropolitics of Traditional ... - IPRsonline.org
Governance and Micropolitics of Traditional ... - IPRsonline.org
Governance and Micropolitics of Traditional ... - IPRsonline.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Box 4: Indigenous Peoples <strong>and</strong> Local Communities: Various Definitions<br />
Tribal Peoples: tribal peoples in independent countries whose social, cultural <strong>and</strong> economic conditions<br />
distinguish them from other sections <strong>of</strong> the national community, <strong>and</strong> whose status is regulated wholly or partially<br />
by their own customs or traditions or by special laws or regulations (ILO Convention 169).<br />
Indigenous Peoples: peoples in independent countries who are regarded as indigenous on account <strong>of</strong> their<br />
descent from the populations who inhabited the country, or a geographical region to which the country belongs,<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> conquest, or colonisation, or the establishment <strong>of</strong> present state boundaries, <strong>and</strong> who, irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />
their legal status, retain some or all <strong>of</strong> their own social, economic, cultural <strong>and</strong> political institutions (ILO<br />
Convention 169).<br />
Indigenous Cultural Communities or Indigenous Peoples: a homogeneous society identified by selfascription<br />
<strong>and</strong> ascription by others which has continuously lived as a community on communally bounded <strong>and</strong><br />
defined territory, sharing common bonds <strong>of</strong> language, customs, traditions <strong>and</strong> other distinctive cultural traits, <strong>and</strong><br />
which through resistance to the political, social <strong>and</strong> cultural inroads <strong>of</strong> colonization, became historically<br />
differentiated from the majority <strong>of</strong> Filipinos (Department Administrative Order, No 96-20, Section 2.1<br />
‘implementing Rules <strong>and</strong> Regulations for Executive Order 247, the Philippines’).<br />
Indigenous <strong>and</strong> Local Communities: indigenous, Afro-American <strong>and</strong> local communities are human groups<br />
whose social, cultural <strong>and</strong> economic conditions distinguish them from other sectors <strong>of</strong> the national community,<br />
who are governed totally or partially by their own customs or traditions or special legislation, <strong>and</strong> who,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> their legal status, conserve their own social, economic, cultural <strong>and</strong> political institutions or parts<br />
there<strong>of</strong> (Decision 391, Andean Pact).<br />
Local Community: a group <strong>of</strong> people having a long st<strong>and</strong>ing social <strong>org</strong>anisation that binds them together<br />
whether in a defined area or otherwise; it shall include indigenous peoples <strong>and</strong> local populations, <strong>and</strong> shall where<br />
appropriate refer to any <strong>org</strong>anisation duly registered under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this act to represent its interest<br />
(Community Intellectual Rights Act, 1994, Third World Network).<br />
Locality/Local Community (in the context <strong>of</strong> local plant variety protection): A sui juris person, residing <strong>and</strong><br />
commonly inheriting <strong>and</strong> passing over culture continually, who takes part in the conservation or development <strong>of</strong><br />
the (local) plant variety (Plant Varieties Protection Act, B.E. 2542 (1999), Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>).<br />
Source: Adapted version <strong>of</strong> Laird, S. (ed) (2002) Biodiversity <strong>and</strong> <strong>Traditional</strong> Knowledge: Equitable<br />
Partnerships in Practice. Earthscan, London; <strong>and</strong> Plant Varieties Protection Act, B.E. 2542 (1999), Kingdom <strong>of</strong><br />
Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />
The country <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> contains a considerable ethnic, linguistic, cultural <strong>and</strong> religious<br />
mosaic, despite the imposition, from the time <strong>of</strong> King Chulalongkorn (1868-1910), <strong>of</strong> a<br />
unifying language <strong>and</strong> culture with the aim <strong>of</strong> creating national unity. Compared to some <strong>of</strong><br />
its neighbours though it contains a more homogenous ethno-cultural mix <strong>and</strong> this is reflected<br />
in the fact that 95% <strong>of</strong> the population are declared Buddhists (Theravada Buddhism) <strong>and</strong> more<br />
than 90% have a Thai language as their mother tongue (Kermel-Torres, D. 2004).<br />
In drafting their Acts, Thail<strong>and</strong> has deliberately not used the term ‘indigenous’ because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ambiguity in many <strong>of</strong> the definitions. Rather it has used <strong>and</strong> defined the term ‘local<br />
community’ in the PVP Act, <strong>and</strong> there are references to traditional or local communities in the<br />
Constitution, <strong>Traditional</strong> Medicines Act, <strong>and</strong> Community Forests Bill. 44 The term indigenous<br />
is particularly problematic in Thail<strong>and</strong> because it could be broadly interpreted to include all<br />
Thais <strong>and</strong> related ethnic groups, as Thail<strong>and</strong> has never been colonised by an external power.<br />
Using the quite broad ILO Convention 169 definition, one could imply that the bulk <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong> are actually ‘indigenous peoples’, <strong>and</strong> that ‘tribal peoples’ would<br />
adequately describe the ‘hill tribes’ or ‘chao khao’ minority groups that make up a small<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>and</strong> primarily reside in the North <strong>of</strong> the country.<br />
44 In July 2005 the Joint Parliamentary Committee working on the Community Forests Bill opted not to define<br />
‘indigenous peoples’ because it was perceived to be too problematic (Srethasirote, Personal Communication July<br />
2005).<br />
78