14.03.2014 Views

SESSION ONE - JMap

SESSION ONE - JMap

SESSION ONE - JMap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH<br />

The University of the State of New York<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong><br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION<br />

IN<br />

ENGLISH<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong><br />

Wednesday, August 13, 2008 — 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

The last page of this booklet is the answer sheet for the multiple-choice<br />

questions. Fold the last page along the perforations and, slowly and carefully, tear<br />

off the answer sheet. Then fill in the heading of your answer sheet. Now circle<br />

“Session One” and fill in the heading of each page of your essay booklet.<br />

This session of the examination has two parts. Part A tests listening skills; you<br />

are to answer all six multiple-choice questions and write a response, as directed.<br />

For Part B, you are to answer all ten multiple-choice questions and write a<br />

response, as directed.<br />

When you have completed this session of the examination, you must sign the<br />

statement printed at the end of the answer sheet, indicating that you had no<br />

unlawful knowledge of the questions or answers prior to the session and that you<br />

have neither given nor received assistance in answering any of the questions<br />

during the session. Your answer sheet cannot be accepted if you fail to sign this<br />

declaration.<br />

The use of any communications device is strictly prohibited when taking this<br />

examination. If you use any communications device, no matter how briefly, your<br />

examination will be invalidated and no score will be calculated for you.<br />

DO NOT OPEN THIS EXAMINATION BOOKLET UNTIL THE SIGNAL IS GIVEN.<br />

COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH <strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong>


Part A<br />

Overview: For this part of the test, you will listen to an account about the electric guitar, answer some<br />

multiple-choice questions, and write a response based on the situation described below. You will hear the<br />

account twice. You may take notes on the next page anytime you wish during the readings.<br />

The Situation: Your social studies class is studying 20th-century American<br />

inventions. For your project, you have decided to write a report about the<br />

invention of the electric guitar and how it has helped to shape<br />

contemporary music. In preparation for writing your report, listen to an<br />

account by historian Monica M. Smith about the invention of the electric<br />

guitar. Then use relevant information from the account to write your report.<br />

Your Task: Write a report for your social studies class about the invention of the electric<br />

guitar and how it has helped to shape contemporary music.<br />

Guidelines:<br />

Be sure to<br />

• Tell your audience what they need to know about the invention of the electric guitar<br />

• Discuss how the electric guitar has helped to shape contemporary music<br />

• Use specific, accurate, and relevant information from the account to support your<br />

discussion<br />

• Use a tone and level of language appropriate for a report for a social studies class<br />

• Organize your ideas in a logical and coherent manner<br />

• Indicate any words taken directly from the account by using quotation marks or<br />

referring to the speaker<br />

• Follow the conventions of standard written English<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [2]


NOTES<br />

DO NOT TURN THIS PAGE UNTIL YOU ARE TOLD TO DO SO.<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [3] [OVER]


Multiple-Choice Questions<br />

Directions (1–6): Use your notes to answer the following questions about the passage read to you. Select the best<br />

suggested answer and write its number in the space provided on the answer sheet. The questions may help you think<br />

about ideas and information you might use in your writing. You may return to these questions anytime you wish.<br />

1 The electric guitar originally was invented to<br />

accommodate the need for<br />

(1) additional chords<br />

(2) increased volume<br />

(3) background rhythms<br />

(4) classical melodies<br />

2 Distortions created by early electric guitars led<br />

innovators to design the new instrument with a<br />

(1) solid body (3) single microphone<br />

(2) spontaneous pickup (4) small speaker<br />

3 According to the speaker, in the late 1960s Jimi<br />

Hendrix’s playing of a Gibson Flying V renewed<br />

interest in<br />

(1) folk music (3) music theory<br />

(2) steel strings (4) guitar shapes<br />

4 According to the speaker, the invention of the<br />

electric guitar was directly responsible for the<br />

rise of<br />

(1) big-band music (3) rock ’n’ roll<br />

(2) rhythm and blues (4) fusion jazz<br />

5 The speaker refers to Bonnie Raitt and Joan Jett<br />

as examples of people who have changed the<br />

perception of the<br />

(1) current dance trends<br />

(2) electric guitar player<br />

(3) unrecognized music producer<br />

(4) classical blues approach<br />

6 The speaker states that “the electric guitar is a<br />

prime example of the law of unintended<br />

consequences” because the changes it brought<br />

about were<br />

(1) surprising (3) minor<br />

(2) regulated (4) misunderstood<br />

After you have finished these questions, turn to page 2. Review The<br />

Situation and read Your Task and the Guidelines. Use scrap paper to<br />

plan your response. Then write your response in Part A, beginning on<br />

page 1 of your essay booklet. After you finish your response for Part A, go<br />

to page 5 of your examination booklet and complete Part B.<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [4]


Part B<br />

Directions: Read the text and study the graphic on the following pages, answer the multiple-choice questions,<br />

and write a response based on the situation described below. You may use the margins to take notes as you read<br />

and scrap paper to plan your response.<br />

The Situation: Your school’s athletic department is planning its budget<br />

and has asked for student input. You have decided to write a letter to your<br />

school’s athletic department recommending that lacrosse be a part of the<br />

school’s sports program.<br />

Your Task: Using relevant information from both documents, write a letter to your school’s<br />

athletic department in which you recommend that lacrosse be a part of the school’s sports<br />

program. Write only the body of the letter.<br />

Guidelines:<br />

Be sure to<br />

• Tell your audience what they need to know about lacrosse<br />

• Recommend reasons why lacrosse should be a part of the school’s sports program<br />

• Use specific, accurate, and relevant information from the text and the graphic to<br />

support your recommendations<br />

• Use a tone and level of language appropriate for a letter to your school’s athletic<br />

department<br />

• Organize your ideas in a logical and coherent manner<br />

• Indicate any words taken directly from the text by using quotation marks or<br />

referring to the author<br />

• Follow the conventions of standard written English<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [5] [OVER]


5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

45<br />

50<br />

Text<br />

…Twenty years ago lacrosse—in shorthand, lax—existed as a niche 1 sport,<br />

popular in and around Baltimore and parts of New York State and New England,<br />

with most of the top players developed on boarding school campuses. Now the<br />

number of youth-league players in the U.S. aged 15 and under is estimated to be<br />

186,000, more than twice what it was in 2001. The explosion is similar at the high<br />

school level, where no other team sport has anything close to lacrosse’s rate of<br />

growth. Two African-American midfielders, Johns Hopkins’s Kyle Harrison and<br />

Ohio State’s Regina Oliver, are among this season’s [2005] best college players, a<br />

striking development in a sport long associated with pedigreed preppies.<br />

Equipment sales are rising by at least 10% annually, and a 2004 survey of 400<br />

sports-industry executives identified lacrosse as the pro niche sport most likely to<br />

bust out. “There’s a drumbeat,” says Bob Crowley of Mustang Management, a<br />

private equity firm that has sunk millions into the lacrosse equipment company<br />

Cascade. “Just go into your community on a Thursday night and look at the<br />

number of kids playing lacrosse.”<br />

The game is even penetrating the consciousness of Joe Fan. While in 2002<br />

you could have found precisely three nationally televised lacrosse games, all<br />

collegiate, on network and cable, this year [2005] NBC has already aired the All-<br />

Star Game of the indoor National Lacrosse League and will cover the NLL<br />

Champion’s Cup final on May 14; the just-launched network ESPNU will add 10<br />

regular-season games to ESPN’s NCAA championship coverage; over the<br />

summer ESPN2 plans to air a game of the week from Major League Lacrosse,<br />

the outdoor pro league, for 12 weeks; and cable newcomer CSTV is airing 22<br />

college games, men’s and women’s, in all divisions. Nearly 47,000 people turned<br />

out in Baltimore last spring for the semifinal matches of the NCAA [National<br />

Collegiate Athletic Association] men’s Final Four, and for the final, between Navy<br />

and Syracuse, ESPN logged a record 0.7 rating, nearly doubling its figure from<br />

2002.…<br />

Part of the game’s appeal is its composite nature. If you like basketball,<br />

lacrosse offers zone and man-to-man defenses, fast breaks and set plays, and its<br />

basic offensive maneuver is that hoops staple, pass and screen away from the ball.<br />

If you like soccer, lax has the precision passes and the ability to bring spectators<br />

to their feet with a goal—except that fans find themselves on their feet 20 times<br />

a game. If you like ice hockey, the action and even the terminology are much the<br />

same in lacrosse, from face-offs to man advantages to setups behind the net. And<br />

if you’re a boy who likes football, you get to put on a helmet and pads and hit<br />

somebody. (The difference, says former Syracuse coach Roy Simmons Jr., is that<br />

lax “is not 11 guys coming out of a huddle knowing what’s about to happen.<br />

It’s more fanciful, imaginative and open.”) The women’s game, by contrast, is<br />

noncontact, without helmets or pads, and its prohibition of body checking allows<br />

for more fluid play.…<br />

As parents discover that lacrosse is more exciting than soccer, cheaper than<br />

ice hockey and not as dangerous as football, the game is getting a closer look. If<br />

they’re not careful, lacrosse’s promoters risk setting up the sport for an almost<br />

impossible task: Scroll down the long list of what ails youth sports, and in most<br />

cases lacrosse seems to offer an antidote. Youth lax programs don’t hesitate to<br />

ban zones and long sticks on defense, switch players from position to position or<br />

do whatever else it takes to keep kids engaged without changing the essence of<br />

the game. At all-day lax “jamborees” the games are almost incidental to the<br />

picnicking and socializing. US Lacrosse, the national governing body for the<br />

1 niche — small protected area<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [6]


55<br />

60<br />

65<br />

70<br />

75<br />

80<br />

85<br />

90<br />

95<br />

sport, also holds annual Youth Festivals where 15-and-under and 13-and-under<br />

games fill a dozen fields but no one officially keeps score.<br />

A kid today will often turn to extreme sports for the autonomy they bestow:<br />

No parent or youth coach knows skateboarding well enough to project his<br />

unfulfilled dreams or adult insecurities onto a rider and mess with the kid’s fun.<br />

In lacrosse, too, “parents aren’t yelling as much on the sidelines, because they<br />

don’t know what’s going on,” says David Morrow, a former U.S. national team<br />

player who founded the equipment company Warrior. “Kids can really take<br />

ownership of the sport.”<br />

In fact, while youth baseball coaches expect 10-year-olds to hit the cutoff man<br />

and turn double plays, lacrosse makes only modest demands on a beginner. “At<br />

its simplest, lacrosse is shoveling,” Morrow says. “If you can scoop the ball off the<br />

ground and run fast, you don’t even need to know how to cradle [the wrist action<br />

that enables a player to control the ball in his stickhead]. You can get a shot off<br />

before you lose the ball.” Moreover, at a time when kids feel pressure from<br />

coaches and parents to specialize in one sport, lacrosse has long encouraged the<br />

renaissance approach. 2 “I’ve never heard a soccer coach say, ‘I want him to play<br />

lacrosse too,’ ” says Dan Corcoran, a youth coach in Connecticut, “but all the time<br />

you’ll hear lacrosse coaches say something like, ‘You can see his toughness from<br />

playing hockey.’ We get baseball players by encouraging them to play both<br />

sports.”…<br />

Lacrosse even has an ace up its sleeve: a pilot program that US Lacrosse just<br />

launched with the Stanford-based Positive Coaching Alliance, a group dedicated<br />

to eliminating abusive and unsportsmanlike behavior by youth coaches, parents<br />

and spectators. Under the program lacrosse officials, including a “sideline<br />

manager” supplied by each team, can hand out a colored card—inscribed with<br />

the words PLEASE RETHINK YOUR ACTIONS/THIS EVENT MAY BE<br />

TERMINATED IF YOUR CONDUCT DOES NOT IMPROVE—to put a<br />

spectator on notice that his behavior is unacceptable. If the misconduct does not<br />

stop, the game could be called and the loss assigned to the team unable to control<br />

its supporters.<br />

“We’re small enough to introduce these seeds at the grassroots, while other<br />

sports are so vast that it’s tough to make changes sportwide,” says US Lacrosse<br />

executive director Steve Stenersen. “We have an interesting mix of qualities, and<br />

at a very interesting time, when people are more fed up with sports in general.”<br />

In the 1630s, while watching the Huron Indians play their ball game, a<br />

French Canadian missionary decided that the stick they used resembled a<br />

bishop’s crosier. 3 In his journal he called the game le jeu de la crosse. About 230<br />

years later a Montreal dentist, W. George Beers, wrote up a set of rules that<br />

adapted the Native American game to Victorian specifications. As old as lacrosse<br />

is, the U.S. game has had a unified national governing body for only seven years.<br />

Over that time US Lacrosse—which makes rules and policies for most levels of<br />

the game, helps develop the game at its grassroots and sanctions youth<br />

tournaments, the high school national championships and the college club<br />

championships—has increased what it spends to promote the sport from $1.1<br />

million to $9 million. Still, US Lacrosse’s operating revenue of $6.2 million in<br />

2003 was less than a third of USA Hockey’s $22.5 million….<br />

—Alexander Wolff<br />

excerpted from “Get on the Stick”<br />

Sports Illustrated, April 25, 2005<br />

2 renaissance approach — encouraging different interests and expertise in a number of areas<br />

3 crosier — a bishop’s staff which resembles a shepherd’s crook<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [7] [OVER]


GRAPHIC<br />

Graph<br />

Number of Athletes<br />

100,000<br />

90,000<br />

80,000<br />

70,000<br />

60,000<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

0<br />

1982<br />

High School Participation in Lacrosse<br />

1984<br />

1986<br />

1988<br />

1990<br />

1992<br />

1994<br />

Year<br />

1996<br />

1998<br />

2000<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

2002<br />

2004<br />

Source: (adapted) Laxpower.com<br />

and National Federation of High Schools/Sports Illustrated<br />

April 25, 2005<br />

Map<br />

Youth Participation<br />

Increase, 2001– 04*<br />

Northwest<br />

+297%<br />

Great Lakes<br />

+158%<br />

Northeast<br />

+44%<br />

Southwest<br />

+108%<br />

Central<br />

+150%<br />

Southeast<br />

+337%<br />

Mid Atlantic<br />

+214%<br />

*Players aged 15 and under who are members of US Lacrosse<br />

Source: (adapted) US Lacrosse/Sports Illustrated<br />

April 25, 2005<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [8]


Multiple-Choice Questions<br />

Directions (7–16): Select the best suggested answer to each question and write its number in the space<br />

provided on the answer sheet. The questions may help you think about ideas and information you might want<br />

to use in your writing. You may return to these questions anytime you wish.<br />

7 From 2001 through 2005, the number of lacrosse<br />

players aged 15 and under in the United States<br />

has<br />

(1) increased slightly (3) tripled<br />

(2) doubled (4) decreased slightly<br />

8 The author implies that lacrosse was once<br />

considered a niche sport because it was<br />

(1) French in origin (3) complex in rules<br />

(2) popular in Europe (4) limited in location<br />

9 As used in line 29, the word “composite” most<br />

nearly refers to a combination of<br />

(1) scores (3) characteristics<br />

(2) regulations (4) spectators<br />

10 According to the text, lacrosse has the potential<br />

to become an “antidote” (line 46) for the ills of<br />

other sports because of its<br />

(1) flexible programs<br />

(2) experienced coaches<br />

(3) groomed fields<br />

(4) commercial endorsements<br />

11 The Positive Coaching Alliance encourages<br />

(1) better coaching (3) better behavior<br />

(2) more competition (4) more scoring<br />

12 Lacrosse was originally played by<br />

(1) Native Americans (3) African Americans<br />

(2) colonists (4) missionaries<br />

13 The graph shows that the number of girls playing<br />

high school lacrosse in 2004 was approximately<br />

(1) 50,000 (3) 30,000<br />

(2) 60,000 (4) 40,000<br />

14 According to the graph, from 1982 to 2004<br />

participation of male and female high school<br />

lacrosse players has<br />

(1) decreased at a similar rate<br />

(2) increased at a similar rate<br />

(3) increased at a much faster rate for males<br />

(4) increased at a much faster rate for females<br />

15 According to the map, youth participation in<br />

lacrosse has increased most in the<br />

(1) Southeast (3) Northeast<br />

(2) Mid Atlantic (4) Northwest<br />

16 According to the map, lacrosse statistics are<br />

reported based on participants’<br />

(1) gender and affiliation (3) age and region<br />

(2) team and skill level (4) weight and height<br />

After you have finished these questions, turn to page 5. Review The Situation<br />

and read Your Task and the Guidelines. Use scrap paper to plan your response.<br />

Then write your response to Part B, beginning on page 7 of your essay booklet.<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [9]


The University of the State of New York<br />

Session One – Essay A<br />

Essay B<br />

________<br />

________<br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION IN ENGLISH<br />

Session Two – Essay A<br />

Essay B<br />

________<br />

________<br />

Tear Here<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong><br />

Wednesday, August 13, 2008 — 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

Total Essay Score<br />

Session One –<br />

A–Multiple Choice<br />

B–Multiple Choice<br />

________<br />

________<br />

Session Two –<br />

A–Multiple Choice<br />

________<br />

ANSWER SHEET<br />

Total Multiple Choice<br />

Final Score<br />

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sex: ■ Male ■ Female<br />

School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . Teacher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Write your answers to the multiple-choice questions for Part A and Part B on this answer sheet.<br />

Part A<br />

Part B<br />

1 _______ 7 _______<br />

2 _______ 8 _______<br />

3 _______ 9 _______<br />

4 _______ 10 _______<br />

5 _______ 11 _______<br />

6 _______ 12 _______<br />

13 _______<br />

14 _______<br />

15 _______<br />

16 _______<br />

HAND IN THIS ANSWER SHEET WITH YOUR ESSAY BOOKLET,<br />

SCRAP PAPER, AND EXAMINATION BOOKLET.<br />

Your essay responses for Part A and Part B should be written in the essay booklet.<br />

Tear Here<br />

I do hereby affirm, at the close of this examination, that I had no unlawful knowledge of the questions or answers prior to the examination and<br />

that I have neither given nor received assistance in answering any of the questions during the examination.<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

Signature<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session One – Aug. ’08 [11]


DIRECTIONS FOR TEACHERS<br />

LISTENING SECTION<br />

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION IN ENGLISH<br />

Wednesday, August 13, 2008 — 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong><br />

BE SURE THAT THE LISTENING SECTION IS ADMINISTERED TO EVERY STUDENT.<br />

1 Before the start of the examination period, say:<br />

Do not open the examination booklet until you are instructed to do so.<br />

2 Distribute one examination booklet and one essay booklet to each student.<br />

3 After each student has received an examination booklet and an essay booklet, say:<br />

Tear off the answer sheet, which is the last page of the examination<br />

booklet, and fill in its heading. Now circle “Session One” and fill in the<br />

heading on each page of your essay booklet.<br />

4 After the students have filled in all headings on their answer sheets and essay booklets, say:<br />

Look at page 2 of your examination booklet and follow along while I read<br />

the Overview and The Situation.<br />

Overview:<br />

For this part of the test, you will listen to an account about the electric<br />

guitar, answer some multiple-choice questions, and write a response<br />

based on the situation described below. You will hear the account twice.<br />

You may take notes on the next page anytime you wish during the<br />

readings.<br />

The Situation:<br />

Your social studies class is studying 20th-century American inventions.<br />

For your project, you have decided to write a report about the invention<br />

of the electric guitar and how it has helped to shape contemporary music.<br />

In preparation for writing your report, listen to an account by historian<br />

Monica M. Smith about the invention of the electric guitar. Then use<br />

relevant information from the account to write your report.<br />

Now I will read the passage aloud to you for the first time.<br />

5 Now read the passage aloud, including the attribution at the end. Read with appropriate expression, but without<br />

added comment.


Listening Passage<br />

Some things were invented for obvious reasons. With others, the motivation is less<br />

clear. Consider, for example, the electric guitar. When guitarists first crudely electrified<br />

their instruments in the 1920s, what were they trying to do? Why change something that<br />

had been successful for hundreds of years? Could they have envisioned that the instrument<br />

that inspired some of [classical composers] Vivaldi’s and Boccherini’s most beautiful<br />

compositions would one day be used by Motörhead and blink-182?<br />

In fact, the driving force behind the invention of the electric guitar was simply the search<br />

for a louder sound, a desire that had existed long before the development of electronic<br />

amplifiers and speakers in the 1920s. As musical performances moved to increasingly large<br />

public spaces over the course of the nineteenth century, the sizes of ensembles grew<br />

correspondingly, and musicians needed more volume. For this and other reasons,<br />

Americans had been making innovations in guitar design since before the Civil War.…<br />

The quest for volume intensified during the 1920s with the advent of big-band music and<br />

commercial radio and the rise of the recording industry. By the end of the decade the bigband<br />

era was in full swing, but the guitar was stuck in the rhythm section and couldn’t be<br />

heard in crowded, noisy clubs, bars, and dancehalls. Since recordings were made directly<br />

to phonograph disks, using either an acoustical recording horn or a single electric<br />

microphone for the whole band, there was no way to boost the guitar’s sound in the studio<br />

either.…<br />

By the end of the 1930s electronic amplification was firmly established as the best way to<br />

make a guitar louder, despite some misgivings among traditionalists. Detractors<br />

complained that it did not produce a pure, “authentic” tone, and in a sense they were right:<br />

Bypassing the resonance created by the hollow body meant altering the instrument’s<br />

traditional timbre. But musicians were championing the electric’s louder sound, which<br />

enabled the guitar to compete with other instruments in ensemble performances. Instead<br />

of trying to duplicate the warmth and lushness of an acoustic guitar, musicians and<br />

engineers tinkered with their equipment and ended up creating an entirely new kind of<br />

sound.…<br />

Yet along with its benefits, the new technology brought problems. Reverberation of the<br />

sound through the instrument’s hollow body, which was responsible for the guitar’s lovely<br />

timbre when played acoustically, caused distortion, overtones, and feedback when<br />

combined with electromagnetic pickups. But as the electric guitar developed its own sonic<br />

qualities and style of play, musicians and manufacturers realized that it should be designed<br />

from scratch with amplification in mind. This led a few innovators to think about replacing<br />

the hollow body with a solid one.…<br />

Because the sonic character of a solid-body electric does not depend on its shape, makers<br />

could experiment with a wide range of imaginative designs. The Stratocaster, modernistic<br />

and space-age yet still recognizably guitar-shaped, remains a classic of 1950s design. The<br />

Gibson Flying V was the firm’s first boldly shaped electric guitar. It was introduced in 1958<br />

as part of a modernistic line of guitars, along with the angular, asymmetrical Explorer.<br />

These designs proved too extreme for the market and were soon discontinued. In the late<br />

1960s, however, musicians like Albert King and Jimi Hendrix (who was recently named the<br />

greatest guitarist of all time by Rolling Stone [Magazine]) helped revive the Flying V’s<br />

popularity, encouraging guitar makers to develop other adventurous shapes.<br />

While the electric guitar was feeding rock ’n’ roll’s explosive growth, what about the<br />

genre of music that had started it all? In jazz the guitar lost its role as a rhythm instrument<br />

with the demise of the big bands in the 1950s. As a solo instrument, the electric guitar is<br />

[2]


still struggling to free itself from its associations with fusion (jazz for rock fans) and smooth<br />

jazz (jazz for office workers). Those genres do have their adherents, of course. And with<br />

such virtuosos as George Benson and Pat Metheny, jazz guitar is still alive and doing about<br />

as well as anything else in jazz. Yet if there had been no electric guitar, jazz today would<br />

sound pretty much the same, whereas rock ’n’ roll would not exist at all.…<br />

The most powerful demonstration of the electric guitar’s role as a sociopolitical symbol<br />

came at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival, when Bob Dylan, a tireless innovator in folk and<br />

blues idioms and a protest singer of solidly liberal values, plugged in an electric guitar amid<br />

boos and catcalls from the audience. On one level, it was a betrayal; the young genius who<br />

could have led a new generation of fans to the timeless joys of American folk music was<br />

instead (as the folkies saw it) pandering to the tastes of teenyboppers. More than that,<br />

however, Dylan’s act of plugging in symbolized the merger of the political left with the<br />

counterculture. The divergent paths Dylan’s music was taking were not what alienated fans;<br />

it was the electric guitar. Dylan could get as experimental as he wanted, and everything<br />

would have been fine as long as he didn’t plug in.…<br />

Through the 1970s and 1980s rock guitarists continued experimenting. One genre<br />

emphasized raucous power chords, flashy solos, and overall loud volume. It came to be<br />

known as “heavy metal.” Eddie Van Halen, of the band Van Halen, experimented with<br />

stunts like dive-bombing, using the tremolo arm to drive the guitar’s lowest note even lower.<br />

Hendrix had done this, but he usually forced the guitar out of tune as a result. However,<br />

by the mid-1980s the inventor Floyd Rose had improved solid-body guitar tremolo systems,<br />

making it possible to dive-bomb repeatedly.…<br />

In keeping with its status as a symbol of America, the electric guitar is the most<br />

democratic of instruments. It is extremely accessible in terms of both cost and learning<br />

curves. A beginner can manage a few chords after a lesson or two, and sometimes that’s all<br />

you need. And while electric-guitar players are still overwhelmingly male, women are<br />

increasingly making their mark. Once the very act of playing an electric guitar seemed<br />

inherently aggressive and masculine, but since the 1970s female guitarists like Bonnie Raitt<br />

and Joan Jett have become prominent. Raitt got her start playing blues, and her musical<br />

style continues to evolve, combining elements of blues, pop, and rock. Jett and her band<br />

the Blackhearts made a splash in the 1980s with their harder edge. Jett’s influence on the<br />

music scene earned her a place on Rolling Stone’s top 100 list, one of only two women<br />

included (the other was Joni Mitchell).<br />

The electric guitar is a prime example of the law of unintended consequences. At first it<br />

just wanted to be heard, but it ended up taking over popular music and revolutionizing<br />

society along the way. Amplified musical technology is now at the forefront, and since most<br />

of the music we hear is electrified and synthesized, performing “unplugged” has become<br />

the exception rather than the rule. Today, more than seven decades after bursting onto the<br />

scene, the electric guitar is played and enjoyed worldwide and has achieved iconic status as<br />

a symbol of American culture.<br />

—excerpted from “The Electric Guitar,”<br />

American Heritage of Invention and Technology, Summer 2004<br />

[3] [OVER]


6 After reading the passage aloud once, say:<br />

You may take a few minutes to look over The Situation and your notes.<br />

(Pause) Now I will read the passage aloud a second time.<br />

7 Read the passage a second time.<br />

8 After the second reading, say:<br />

Now turn to page 4 of your examination booklet, read the directions, and<br />

answer the multiple-choice questions. Be sure to follow all the directions<br />

given in your examination booklet and your essay booklet. You may now<br />

begin.<br />

[4]


E<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong><br />

FOR TEACHERS ONLY<br />

The University of the State of New York<br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

ENGLISH<br />

Wednesday, August 13, 2008— 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE<br />

Mechanics of Rating<br />

Updated information regarding the rating of this examination may be posted on the<br />

New York State Education Department’s web site during the rating period. Check this<br />

web site http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/ and select the link “Examination Scoring<br />

Information” for any recently posted information regarding this examination. This site<br />

should be checked before the rating process for this examination begins and several times<br />

throughout the Regents examination period.<br />

The following procedures are to be used for rating papers in the Comprehensive<br />

Examination in English. More detailed directions for the organization of the rating<br />

process and procedures for rating the examination are included in the Information<br />

Booklet for Administering and Scoring the Comprehensive Examination in English.<br />

Scoring of Multiple-Choice Questions<br />

Indicate by means of a check mark each incorrect or omitted answer to multiplechoice<br />

questions on the Session One answer sheet; do not place a check mark beside<br />

a correct answer. Use only red ink or red pencil. In the box provided under each<br />

part, record the number of questions the student answered correctly for that part.<br />

Transfer the number of correct answers for the Part A and Part B multiple-choice<br />

questions to the appropriate spaces in the box in the upper right corner of each student’s<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong> answer sheet.<br />

Session One<br />

Correct Answers<br />

Part A Part B<br />

(1) 2 (7) 2<br />

(2) 1 (8) 4<br />

(3) 4 (9) 3<br />

(4) 3 (10) 1<br />

(5) 2 (11) 3<br />

(6) 1 (12) 1<br />

(13) 4<br />

(14) 2<br />

(15) 1<br />

(16) 3<br />

The University of the State of New York • THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT • Albany, New York 12234


COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH — <strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong> — continued<br />

Rating of Essays<br />

(1) Follow your school’s procedures for training for rating. This process should include:<br />

Introduction to the task—<br />

• Raters read the task and summarize its purpose, audience, and format<br />

• Raters read passage(s) and plan own response to task<br />

• Raters share response plans and summarize expectations for student responses<br />

Introduction to the rubric and anchor papers—<br />

• Trainer reviews rubric with reference to the task<br />

• Trainer reviews procedures for assigning scores<br />

• Trainer leads review of each anchor paper and commentary<br />

(Note: Anchor papers are ordered from high to low within each score level.)<br />

Practice scoring individually—<br />

• Raters score a set of five papers individually<br />

• Trainer records scores and leads discussion until raters feel confident enough to move<br />

on to actual scoring<br />

(2) When actual rating begins, each rater should record his or her individual rating for a<br />

student’s essay on the rating sheet provided, not directly on the student’s essay or<br />

answer sheet. Do not correct the student’s work by making insertions or changes of any<br />

kind.<br />

(3) Each essay must be rated by at least two raters; a third rater will be necessary to resolve<br />

scores that differ by more than one point. The scoring coordinator will be responsible<br />

for coordinating the movement of papers, calculating a final score for each student’s<br />

essay, and recording that information on the student’s answer paper for Session One.<br />

[2]


QUALITY<br />

6<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong> – PART A – SCORING RUBRIC<br />

LISTENING AND WRITING FOR INFORMATION AND UNDERSTANDING<br />

5<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

4<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

3<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

2<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

Meaning: the extent to<br />

which the response<br />

exhibits sound<br />

understanding,<br />

interpretation, and<br />

analysis of the task<br />

and text(s)<br />

-reveal an in-depth<br />

analysis of the text<br />

-make insightful<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the text and the assigned<br />

task<br />

-convey a thorough<br />

understanding of the text<br />

-make clear and explicit<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the text and the assigned<br />

task<br />

- convey a basic<br />

understanding of the text<br />

-make implicit<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the text and the assigned<br />

task<br />

-convey a basic<br />

understanding of the text<br />

-make few or superficial<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the text and the assigned<br />

task<br />

-convey a confused or<br />

inaccurate understanding<br />

of the text<br />

-allude to the text but<br />

make unclear or<br />

unwarranted<br />

connections to the<br />

assigned task<br />

Development: the<br />

extent to which ideas<br />

are elaborated using<br />

specific and relevant<br />

evidence from the<br />

text(s)<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and fully, making<br />

effective use of a wide<br />

range of relevant and<br />

specific details from the<br />

text<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and consistently, using<br />

relevant and specific<br />

details from the text<br />

-develop some ideas<br />

more fully than others,<br />

using specific and<br />

relevant details from the<br />

text<br />

-develop ideas briefly,<br />

using some details from<br />

the text<br />

-are incomplete or<br />

largely undeveloped,<br />

hinting at ideas, but<br />

references to the text are<br />

vague, irrelevant,<br />

repetitive, or unjustified<br />

Organization: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

direction, shape, and<br />

coherence<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical and<br />

coherent structure<br />

through skillful use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas<br />

through use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas but<br />

may lack internal<br />

consistency<br />

-establish, but fail to<br />

maintain, an appropriate<br />

focus<br />

- exhibit a rudimentary<br />

structure but may<br />

include some<br />

inconsistencies or<br />

irrelevancies<br />

-lack an appropriate<br />

focus but suggest some<br />

organization, or suggest<br />

a focus but lack<br />

organization<br />

Language Use: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response reveals an<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose through<br />

effective use of words,<br />

sentence structure,<br />

and sentence variety<br />

-are stylistically<br />

sophisticated, using<br />

language that is precise<br />

and engaging, with a<br />

notable sense of voice<br />

and awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

enhance meaning<br />

-use language that is<br />

fluent and original, with<br />

evident awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and<br />

pacing<br />

-use appropriate<br />

language, with some<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose<br />

-occasionally make<br />

effective use of sentence<br />

structure or length<br />

-rely on basic<br />

vocabulary, with little<br />

awareness of audience<br />

or purpose<br />

-exhibit some attempt to<br />

vary sentence structure<br />

or length for effect, but<br />

with uneven success<br />

-use language that is<br />

imprecise or unsuitable<br />

for the audience or<br />

purpose<br />

-reveal little awareness<br />

of how to use sentences<br />

to achieve an effect<br />

Conventions: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

conventional spelling,<br />

punctuation,<br />

paragraphing,<br />

capitalization,<br />

grammar, and usage<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions with<br />

essentially no errors,<br />

even with sophisticated<br />

language<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions,<br />

exhibiting occasional<br />

errors only when using<br />

sophisticated language<br />

-demonstrate partial<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that do<br />

not hinder<br />

comprehension<br />

-demonstrate emerging<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that<br />

hinder comprehension<br />

-demonstrate a lack of<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

frequent errors that make<br />

comprehension difficult<br />

• If the student writes only a personal response and makes no reference to the text(s), the response can be scored no higher than a 1.<br />

• Responses totally unrelated to the topic, illegible, incoherent, or blank should be given a 0.<br />

• A response totally copied from the text(s) with no original student writing should be scored a 0.<br />

1<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide minimal or no<br />

evidence of textual<br />

understanding<br />

-make no connections<br />

between information in<br />

the text and the assigned<br />

task<br />

-are minimal, with no<br />

evidence of development<br />

-show no focus or<br />

organization<br />

-are minimal<br />

-use language that is<br />

incoherent or<br />

inappropriate<br />

-are minimal, making<br />

assessment of<br />

conventions unreliable<br />

- may be illegible or not<br />

recognizable as English<br />

[3]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – A<br />

[4]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – A<br />

[5]


Anchor Level 6 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Reveals an in-depth analysis of the text stating that while the electric guitar has become iconic<br />

… few know the guitar’s humble beginnings. The response makes insightful connections<br />

between information and ideas in the text and the assigned task, noting that early skeptics<br />

denounced the electric guitar, not realizing the tremendous success the electric guitar could,<br />

and would, come to achieve, and that along with artistic creation, the electric guitar brought a<br />

change in sociological and political aspects of American culture.<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

details from the text, explaining the reasons for the invention of the electric guitar. The response<br />

details the plight of the guitar during the jazz era, the early guitar makers who began to think<br />

boldly and to tinker with new guitar shapes, and guitar innovators, such as Jimi Hendrix, Eddie<br />

Van Halen, and Joan Jett, all of whom achieved success through the instrument.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the gradual development of the electric guitar … as<br />

… a symbol of American culture, wealth, and artistic diversity. The response exhibits a logical<br />

and coherent structure by first describing how American teens have embraced the electric<br />

guitar, and then reviews the origins of the electric guitar (Simply put, the guitar was taking a<br />

backseat to the rest of the band). The response then focuses on changes in the electric guitar,<br />

including innovative designs, artistic creation, and the fusion of the liberal left political stance<br />

along with the counterculture. Appropriate devices (Why the desire to go electric?) and<br />

transitions (Either way; Later, however; Since then) are skillfully used.<br />

Is stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging (When performance<br />

spaces grew, so did the desire and need for the volume of the guitar), with a notable sense of<br />

voice and awareness of audience and purpose (Later the plight of the guitar worsened, with the<br />

overpowering scream of trumpets, saxophones and trombones characteristic of Big Band<br />

swing). The response varies structure and length of sentences to enhance meaning (The Gibson<br />

Flying V, introduced in 1958, was one of these new innovative designs, yet proved too eccentric<br />

for the market at the time).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6 in all qualities.<br />

[6]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

[7]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

[8]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

[9]


Anchor Level 6 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Reveals an in-depth analysis of the text by stating that the invention of the electric guitar ... was<br />

a key step in the development and progression of American music that changed music history.<br />

The response makes insightful connections between information and ideas in the text and the<br />

assigned task, noting that early composers defined the type of sound that could be achieved by a<br />

guitar but that these traditionalists are rare in contemporary society as more people begin to<br />

appreciate electric guitar tone, and that the electric guitar has benefitted the American music<br />

industry.<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

details from the text. The response emphasizes the need to boost the sound of the guitar and the<br />

technological problems associated with electric guitars, as well as how these innovations<br />

allowed the guitar makers to experiment with designs and created sounds that can be achieved<br />

only by utilizing the electric guitar.<br />

Organization Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the ways the invention of the electric guitar ...<br />

revolutionized American music. The response exhibits a logical and coherent structure, first<br />

presenting information about the history of the electric guitar and then showing how it has<br />

helped shape contemporary music in a positive way. The response makes skillful use of<br />

appropriate devices and transitions (Before the invention, To solve some of these issues, In fact).<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original, with evident awareness of audience and purpose (As<br />

the quality of electric guitars improved, guitar makers were able to focus on the aesthetic<br />

aspects of the electric guitars). The response varies structure and length of sentences to control<br />

rhythm and pacing (Long before the invention of the electric guitar ... to boost the volume of<br />

accoustic guitars).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (work but,<br />

of the 1950’s such as, electric guitar … instruments’), capitalization (Big Band), and grammar<br />

(in bands who played and has ... begun as a result).<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use and conventions.<br />

[10]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – A<br />

[11]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – A<br />

[12]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – A<br />

Anchor Level 5 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a thorough understanding of the text, describing how the electric guitar was born and<br />

became a leader in the new wave of music. The response makes clear and explicit connections<br />

between information and ideas in the text and the assigned task (In addition, this new “rock ’n’<br />

roll” music was open to many segments of the population, not only in terms of listening to it,<br />

but also in terms of playing it).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, using relevant and specific details from the text to<br />

describe the evolution of the electric guitar (By the 1930’s, electronic amplification had become<br />

recognized as a solution to the problem of a guitar’s low volume and experimentation lead to …<br />

a solid body guitar that eliminated distortions) and its impact in later years (The electric guitar’s<br />

… loud sound allowed people to gather … to listen to it).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on how the electric guitar slowly came to the forefront<br />

of the music industry. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, moving from a<br />

discussion of how and why the electric guitar was developed, to the technological advances,<br />

and finally to the transformational effects on music and society. Appropriate transitions are<br />

used (At this same time, Thus, In addition).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (The idea of the electric guitar came from the hearts of<br />

musicians), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (Meanwhile, “rock ’n’ roll” was<br />

born). The response varies structure and length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing (Folk<br />

musician Bob Dylan also adopted the new electric guitar into his act, marrying the folk protest<br />

music to the “counterculture” of protest surrounding the Vietnam war, thereby creating a new<br />

political reality in America).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

[13]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – B<br />

[14]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – B<br />

Anchor Level 5 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a thorough understanding of the text, stating that the electric guitar had a great impact<br />

on society by shaping contemporary music and helping develop totally new kinds of music. The<br />

response makes clear and explicit connections between information and ideas in the text and the<br />

assigned task (The electric guitar singlehandedly led to the boom of rock-n-roll, but it also had<br />

an effect on other genres).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, using relevant and specific details from the text to<br />

describe the roots of the electric guitar (This led to a significant change: the hollow body<br />

became solid) and its effect on music (Bob Dylan “plugged in”; Eddie Van Halen …<br />

popularized … “dive bombing”; Soon, … women were playing loud rock-n-roll).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on why the electric guitar is America’s instrument. The<br />

response begins with the early history of the electric guitar (there was a need for greater<br />

volume), moves to technical advances (the hollow body … freed up guitar makers to build new<br />

shapes), and ends with its impact (the electric guitar did change rock). Appropriate transitions<br />

are used (One such, Also, Later).<br />

Uses language that is fluent (The 1960’s saw the rise of guitar heros such as Jimi Hendrix, who<br />

revived the Flying V), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (More important, this<br />

led to the style known as heavy metal). The response varies structure and length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and pacing (there was a need for greater volume from the traditional acoustic<br />

guitar, whose sound was lost among the rest of the band’s instruments).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (heros and tremelow) and<br />

punctuation (bold, and was; guitar singlehandedly led; However the; history, was) that do not<br />

hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[15]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – C<br />

[16]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – C<br />

[17]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – C<br />

Anchor Level 5 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a thorough understanding of the text, explaining how the electric guitar inspired the<br />

creation of many genres of music and shaped contempory music. The response makes clear and<br />

explicit connections between information and ideas in the text and the assigned task (In the<br />

making of the electric guitar, many problems needed to be overcome).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, using relevant and specific details from the text to<br />

describe the electric guitar’s creation (The problem with the low volume of the guitar kept it in<br />

the rhythm section and the hollow body … was replaced with a solid frame) and its role in the<br />

expansion of musical styles (All throughout the 1970s and the 1980s, rock musicions continued<br />

experimenting).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the history of the electric guitar. The response<br />

exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, moving from the electric guitar’s birth (there was no way to<br />

boost the guitar sound in the studio) to experimentation (The solid frame allowed guitars to be<br />

shaped in many different ways) and impact (The perception of who played electric guitars also<br />

changed during the 1970s). Appropriate transitions are used (Finally, these different shapes,<br />

also).<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (The different shapes<br />

led to a growth in rock ’n’ roll). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence<br />

structure (This caused people to tinker with the guitar and that created a new sound — the<br />

sound of the electric guitar).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (contempory, accoustic,<br />

musicions, Rate, truely) and capitalization (Heavy Metal) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use and conventions.<br />

[18]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – A<br />

[19]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – A<br />

Anchor Level 4 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text (the invention … has helped to shape contemporary<br />

music). The response makes implicit connections between information and ideas in the text and<br />

the assigned task (Because of this and many other reasons, the guitar has revolutionized society<br />

and music).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant details<br />

from the text to illustrate the demand for electrical amplification (the orchestra drowned out the<br />

guitar) and its successful creation (guitars with solid bodies, unique sound, Flying V or the<br />

Explorer). The idea that not everyone was pleased with the introduction of the electric guitar is<br />

less developed.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the invention of the electric guitar. The response<br />

exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first presenting information on the need for the electric<br />

guitar, then moving to the design, and concluding with its influence on American culture and<br />

society. The response uses appropriate transitions (In the early 20 th Century, such as, Later on).<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (Originally the guitar<br />

was created to accommodate the need for increased volume). The response occasionally makes<br />

effective use of sentence structure (But not everyone was pleased with the introduction of the<br />

electric guitar; many fans felt it was a betrayal), with some lapses (onetheless … and how it<br />

has helped to shape contemporary music).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (espeially and<br />

representive), punctuation (wrong, the; After that the; history, The), and capitalization (Electric<br />

Guitar, Heavy Metal, Rock ’ Roll) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in organization.<br />

[20]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – B<br />

[21]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – B<br />

Anchor Level 4 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text, stating that it took many years to perfect the electric<br />

guitars, but there were different events that took place to make it the way it is now. The<br />

response makes implicit connections between information and ideas in the text and the<br />

assigned task (This helped inventors create … many more and Bonnie Raitt and Joan Jett<br />

helped change the view of the electric guitar players).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant details<br />

from the text to illustrate how changing the guitar’s design helped the guitar shape<br />

contemporary music (the guitar could be any shape … if it was solid and engineers fixed the<br />

tremolo system and allowed guitarists to dive bomb). The idea that the guitar is a symbol of<br />

American culture is undeveloped.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the invention of the electric guitar. The response<br />

exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first discussing the introduction of the electric amplifier,<br />

then explaining design changes, and finishing with the effect this powerful instrument had on<br />

music. The lack of clear chronological order weakens internal consistency (well before the<br />

Civil War, The first event, Soon after).<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (With the electric<br />

guitar near perfection, people like Jimmy Hendrix made them extremely popular in the 60s).<br />

The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence structure and length (Engineers<br />

created new guitars, but with the hollow body, the sound would get distorted).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (existance and Jimmy),<br />

comma usage (mind the, after engineers, Also women), capitalization (flying, Heavy Metal,<br />

Jazz), grammar (guitars … it and guitar … them), and vague pronoun references (This made<br />

them and With that in mind) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

[22]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – C<br />

[23]


Anchor Level 4 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text (Although the intent for the invention of the electric<br />

guitar was not to create new styles of music, many people are … pleased with the outcome).<br />

The response makes implicit connections between information and ideas in the text and the<br />

assigned task (In the 1920’s the increase in music fans made them want a louder sound out of<br />

the guitar).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some details from the text (Ingineers came up with new designs<br />

for the electric guitar and women are also becoming an increasing number of guitar players).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the history and impact of the electric guitar. The<br />

response exhibits a rudimentary structure, consisting of an introductory paragraph, one body<br />

paragraph consisting of several loosely related ideas, followed by a conclusion.<br />

Uses appropriate language that is sometimes inexact (messed up, more different, Males were the<br />

most common to play), with some awareness of audience and purpose (The electric guitar has<br />

helped shape the music world we have today). The response occasionally makes effective use of<br />

sentence length (It has made music what it is today).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (musicans, amplications,<br />

greatful), punctuation (However many; 1920’s the; guitar, since), and capitalization (Rock &<br />

Roll) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development and organization.<br />

[24]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – A<br />

[25]


Anchor Level 3 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text by stating that the electric guitar was designed to<br />

make the music loader and produced something new and worthwhile. The response makes<br />

few connections between information and ideas in the text and the assigned task (the electric<br />

guitar was no longer shameful but the symbol of American music).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some details from the text (Jimmi Hendrix brought back the<br />

flying V, Bob Dylon … tried spreading his folk blues via the electric guitar, Thanks to<br />

Vanhallen heavy metal was also introduced to the world).<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on the invention of the electric guitar and the resulting<br />

whole new sound. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure, including an opening<br />

paragraph, one body paragraph of loosely related ideas, and a conclusion.<br />

Uses appropriate language that is sometimes inexact (The electric guitar had a tough rocky<br />

kickstart), with some awareness of purpose (Although looked down upon for quite some time,<br />

it eventually became the standard). The response occasionally makes effective use of<br />

sentence length (A whole new sound came about from this invention).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (soly, loader, innvention,<br />

complecations, acustic, disstortion, Prodemetly) and occasional errors in punctuation (looks<br />

some and sound but) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in language use and conventions.<br />

[26]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – B<br />

[27]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – B<br />

Anchor Level 3 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text. The response makes superficial connections between<br />

information and ideas in the text and the assigned task, stating that the inventors of the electric<br />

guitar were in search of a louder sound.<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some ideas from the text, but is sometimes inaccurate (This new<br />

sound helped to shape big band music and Iventors then came up with the amp. in the 1930’s).<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, a focus on the idea that the electric guitar is an invention that<br />

revolutionized society. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure but includes some<br />

inconsistencies (presenting information about Jimmie Hendrix and dive-bombing then shifting<br />

to Bonnie Raitt and Jett, with no connection between the ideas) and irrelevancies (The way<br />

people act, dress, and live is shown through music).<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is sometimes imprecise (ways shape; amp.; The electric is),<br />

with little awareness of audience or purpose (And to think if the guitar had not been invented<br />

society would be totally different). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence<br />

structure and length, but with uneven success (This guitar is played world wide and is iconic).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (contemperary, rythm,<br />

Jimmie), punctuation (on society. And to think; From the early 1920’s people; this new sound,<br />

others felt), and capitalization (Rock and Roll) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

[28]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – C<br />

[29]


Anchor Level 3 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the text. The response makes superficial connections between<br />

information and ideas in the text and the assigned task, stating that the first electric guitar ...<br />

could be connected to Speakers And Crowds of people Could hear the Sound and that the<br />

electric guitar will be here for many more years to come.<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some details from the text (there was a problem with the electric<br />

guitar due it being hollow and two females … changed the perception of the female electric<br />

guitar players).<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on how people tried to Create A Louder guitar, but fails to<br />

maintain it, ending with the future of the electric guitar. The response exhibits a rudimentary<br />

single-paragraph structure of loosely connected ideas that begins with a single introductory<br />

sentence and ends with a concluding sentence.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary, with little awareness of audience or purpose (The guitar was a<br />

great indvention, but when it was played with other instruments the guitar was over powered<br />

due its volume). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure, but with uneven<br />

success (So the manufactors Created a Soild guitar insead of A Hollow guitar).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (becomming, soid,<br />

discontuded), punctuation (Finally in 1920; the gibson flying v. Which created sales; 100 years<br />

old, It will be), capitalization (Company Came, people tried to Create, raitt), and a lack of<br />

paragraphing that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[30]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – A<br />

[31]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – A<br />

Anchor Level 2 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused understanding of the text (The electric Guitar has helped shape<br />

contemporary music in many ways and it has also made it bad in many ways also). The<br />

response alludes to the text but makes unclear connections to the assigned task (The electric<br />

Guitar created louder sound such as when you are at a concert, you can hear everything<br />

better).<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the text are vague<br />

(Jazz lost it as a Rythm instrument), irrelevant (Also they created the electric microphone which<br />

they thought was the best way to make everything louder), and unjustified (The Electric Guitar<br />

has been the “Good and Bad” instrument).<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus on ways the electric guitar has helped<br />

shape contemporary music. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure (introduction, two<br />

body paragraphs, and a conclusion) but is inconsistent, shifting the discussion from the positive<br />

and Good ways of the electric guitar to a disorganized presentation of its Bad and egative<br />

affects.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (The rise of the recording industry<br />

plumeted and Rock n Roll was finally brought out). The response reveals little awareness of<br />

how to use sentences to achieve an effect (It has helped shape contemporary music and it also<br />

has destoried sound within Rock n Roll and Jazz, and it took away the Solid Guitar from Jazz).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (plumeted, indostry,<br />

destorted), capitalization (Guitar, Good, Bad), and grammar (The Bad and egative affects …<br />

has been the way to alter sound made it to be destorted) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in organization and conventions.<br />

[32]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – B<br />

[33]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – C<br />

[34]


Anchor Level 2 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused and inaccurate understanding of the text, stating that even though Guitar<br />

has had it’s side effects it has had success in music. The response alludes to the text but makes<br />

unwarranted connections to the assigned task (the piano used the guitar … to help make the<br />

music sound better).<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the text are vague<br />

(Guitar was a simple instrument and The guitar … wanted to come out of that Style).<br />

Suggests a focus (the electric guitar change music) but lacks organization. The response<br />

consists of two paragraphs of loosely related statements.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (that is playing along with and<br />

Amplification … wouldn’t have overtune). The response reveals little awareness of how to use<br />

sentences to achieve an effect (Eventually the eletric guitar made a huge turn around if it<br />

wasn’t for Rock & Roll).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (thogh, Hendricks,<br />

eletric), punctuation (music for example the, better it, around if), capitalization (Guitar, Big<br />

Bang Music, Search, Amplification), and grammar (Guitar was a simple instrument and the<br />

electric guitar change music) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

[35]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 1 – A<br />

Anchor Level 1 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides no evidence of textual understanding beyond that found in the prompt. The response<br />

consists of personal reactions.<br />

Is minimal, offering primarily a personal response.<br />

Suggests a focus (the history of the type of music that they are listening to, or the history of<br />

these instruments) and suggests some organization (For Example).<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is occasionally imprecise (Music come second in Americans<br />

past time), with little awareness of audience and purpose. The response exhibits some attempt<br />

to vary sentence structure, but with uneven success (For Example, the electric guitar, its widely<br />

used and popurel world wide).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (past time, apeciciate,<br />

popurel), punctuation (time, television; guitar, its; wide. In), and grammar (world use<br />

instrument) that occasionally hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Although the response fits the criteria for Levels 1, 2, and 3, it remains at Level 1<br />

because the response makes no reference to the text.<br />

[36]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 1 – B<br />

Anchor Level 1 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides minimal evidence of textual understanding beyond a reference to how the electric<br />

guitar is … made for more volume. but as time went by they found better us for it. The response<br />

makes no connections between information in the text and the assigned task.<br />

Is minimal. The response correctly mentions one idea from the text, but fails to discuss it (it<br />

couldn’t be heared in crowed places).<br />

Shows no organization.<br />

Is minimal. The response uses some language that is incoherent (they monedfly it).<br />

Is minimal, making assessment of conventions unreliable.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 1 in all qualities.<br />

[37]


Part A — Practice Paper – A<br />

[38]


Part A — Practice Paper – A<br />

[39]


Part A — Practice Paper – B<br />

[40]


Part A — Practice Paper – C<br />

[41]


Part A — Practice Paper – C<br />

[42]


Part A — Practice Paper – D<br />

[43]


Part A — Practice Paper – D<br />

[44]


Part A — Practice Paper – E<br />

[45]


Part A — Practice Paper – E<br />

[46]


Practice Paper A–Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper B–Score Level 2<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper C–Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper D–Score Level 3<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper E–Score Level 5<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5 in all qualities.<br />

[47]


<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong> – PART B – SCORING RUBRIC<br />

READING AND WRITING FOR INFORMATION AND UNDERSTANDING<br />

QUALITY<br />

6<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

5<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

4<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

3<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

2<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

Meaning: the extent to<br />

which the response<br />

exhibits sound<br />

understanding,<br />

interpretation, and<br />

analysis of the task<br />

and text(s)<br />

-reveal an in-depth<br />

analysis of the<br />

documents<br />

-make insightful<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the documents and the<br />

assigned task<br />

-convey a thorough<br />

understanding of the<br />

documents<br />

-make clear and explicit<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the documents and the<br />

assigned task<br />

- convey a basic<br />

understanding of the<br />

documents<br />

-make implicit<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the documents and the<br />

assigned task<br />

-convey a basic<br />

understanding of the<br />

documents<br />

-make few or superficial<br />

connections between<br />

information and ideas in<br />

the documents and the<br />

assigned task<br />

-convey a confused or<br />

inaccurate understanding<br />

of the documents<br />

-allude to the documents<br />

but make unclear or<br />

unwarranted<br />

connections to the<br />

assigned task<br />

Development: the<br />

extent to which ideas<br />

are elaborated using<br />

specific and relevant<br />

evidence from the<br />

document(s)<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and fully, making<br />

effective use of a wide<br />

range of relevant and<br />

specific details from the<br />

documents<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and consistently, using<br />

relevant and specific<br />

details from the<br />

documents<br />

-develop some ideas<br />

more fully than others,<br />

using specific and<br />

relevant details from the<br />

documents<br />

-develop ideas briefly,<br />

using some details from<br />

the documents<br />

-are incomplete or<br />

largely undeveloped,<br />

hinting at ideas, but<br />

references to the<br />

documents are vague,<br />

irrelevant, repetitive, or<br />

unjustified<br />

Organization: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

direction, shape, and<br />

coherence<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical and<br />

coherent structure<br />

through skillful use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas<br />

through use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas but<br />

may lack internal<br />

consistency<br />

-establish, but fail to<br />

maintain, an appropriate<br />

focus<br />

- exhibit a rudimentary<br />

structure but may<br />

include some<br />

inconsistencies or<br />

irrelevancies<br />

-lack an appropriate<br />

focus but suggest some<br />

organization, or suggest<br />

a focus but lack<br />

organization<br />

Language Use: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response reveals an<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose through<br />

effective use of words,<br />

sentence structure,<br />

and sentence variety<br />

-are stylistically<br />

sophisticated, using<br />

language that is precise<br />

and engaging, with a<br />

notable sense of voice<br />

and awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

enhance meaning<br />

-use language that is<br />

fluent and original, with<br />

evident awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and<br />

pacing<br />

-use appropriate<br />

language, with some<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose<br />

-occasionally make<br />

effective use of sentence<br />

structure or length<br />

-rely on basic<br />

vocabulary, with little<br />

awareness of audience<br />

or purpose<br />

-exhibit some attempt to<br />

vary sentence structure<br />

or length for effect, but<br />

with uneven success<br />

-use language that is<br />

imprecise or unsuitable<br />

for the audience or<br />

purpose<br />

-reveal little awareness<br />

of how to use sentences<br />

to achieve an effect<br />

Conventions: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

conventional spelling,<br />

punctuation,<br />

paragraphing,<br />

capitalization,<br />

grammar, and usage<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions with<br />

essentially no errors,<br />

even with sophisticated<br />

language<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions,<br />

exhibiting occasional<br />

errors only when using<br />

sophisticated language<br />

-demonstrate partial<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that do<br />

not hinder<br />

comprehension<br />

-demonstrate emerging<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that<br />

hinder comprehension<br />

-demonstrate a lack of<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

frequent errors that make<br />

comprehension difficult<br />

• If the student addresses only one text, the response can be scored no higher than a 3.<br />

• If the student writes only a personal response and makes no reference to the text(s), the response can be scored no higher than a 1.<br />

• Responses totally unrelated to the topic, illegible, incoherent, or blank should be given a 0.<br />

• A response totally copied from the text(s) with no original student writing should be scored a 0.<br />

1<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide minimal or no<br />

evidence of<br />

understanding<br />

-make no connections<br />

between information in<br />

the documents and the<br />

assigned task<br />

-are minimal, with no<br />

evidence of development<br />

-show no focus or<br />

organization<br />

-are minimal<br />

-use language that is<br />

predominantly<br />

incoherent,<br />

inappropriate, or copied<br />

directly from the text<br />

-are minimal, making<br />

assessment of<br />

conventions unreliable<br />

-may be illegible or not<br />

recognizable as English<br />

[48]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – A<br />

[49]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – A<br />

[50]


Anchor Level 6 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Reveals an in-depth analysis of the documents (Lacrosse incorporates aspects of popular sports<br />

… and therefore would appeal to the sensibilities of many sports fans in the community). The<br />

response makes insightful connections between information and ideas in the documents and the<br />

assigned task (and it only makes sense that we as a school embrace the wave of change and<br />

include lacrosse in our sports program).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully. The response makes effective use of a wide range of relevant<br />

and specific details from the documents to discuss the popularity of lacrosse (it would greatly<br />

increase the number of school sporting events and the number of spectators who attend these<br />

events) and its healthy atmosphere (The newly formed Positive Coaching Alliance encourages<br />

an atmosphere of friendly conduct) as beneficial to both school and community.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the benefits of incorporating lacrosse into the<br />

school’s sports program. The response exhibits a logical and coherent structure, presenting<br />

arguments for adding lacrosse (The most logical reason … is its sheer popularity and Lacrosse<br />

also encourages sportsmanship and … cooperation), and concluding with a return to the<br />

original appeal (I implore you to include it in the budget for next year). Transitional devices are<br />

skillfully used (Since organized lacrosse is a relatively new innovation and By incorporating<br />

lacrosse).<br />

Is stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging (Lacrosse has<br />

expanded its demographic … to a wide range of ages and ethnicities), with a notable sense of<br />

voice and awareness of audience and purpose (We have only to gain by adding lacrosse to our<br />

sports program). The response varies structure and length of sentences to enhance meaning<br />

(There is no pressure in lacrosse … any newcomer can pick up a stick and play).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6 in all qualities.<br />

[51]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[52]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[53]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[54]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

Anchor Level 6 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

[55]<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Reveals an in-depth analysis of the documents, stating that today, athletic teams across the<br />

nation partake in the sport which … retains an innocent “grassroots” essence, allowing<br />

athletes … to play at an appropriate level. The response makes insightful connections between<br />

information and ideas in the documents and the assigned task, explaining that through its<br />

blooming popularity and development as a game, lacrosse provides many valuable<br />

opportunities for students of all social backgrounds to grow … as more mature members of the<br />

community.<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

details from the documents to discuss the appeal and popularity of lacrosse (freedom from strict<br />

regulations and increase of participants by nearly 50,000 since 1982) and its promotion of<br />

positive moral and social values (players from various backgrounds and Positive Coaching<br />

Alliance).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on how lacrosse provides students with invaluable<br />

experiences and social interactions … often overlooked in other sports. The response exhibits a<br />

logical and coherent structure, first presenting the history of lacrosse, then providing arguments<br />

for its inclusion into the school’s athletic program (its universal appeal and kind, nuturing<br />

environment for young people), and concluding that the benefits of a school lacrosse team are<br />

undeniable. Transitions are skillfully used (These industry experts, Another source, As a newly<br />

established organized sport).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (The sport has also grown to incorporate players from<br />

every ethnic background and the ancient Indian game of traditional values imparts powerful,<br />

contemporary values), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (I ask you … consider<br />

the countless benefits of … lacrosse). The response varies structure and length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and pacing (That game was lacrosse).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use.


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – A<br />

[56]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – A<br />

[57]


Anchor Level 5 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Reveals an in-depth analysis of the documents, stating that rising interest in the sport has<br />

encouraged many high schools to incorporate it into their athletic programs. The response<br />

makes insightful connections between information and ideas in the documents and the assigned<br />

task (Our school can’t afford to miss out on this popular and versatile sport).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently. The response uses relevant and specific details from<br />

the documents to discuss lacrosse’s growth (Men’s high school lacrosse has grown by nearly<br />

20,000), popularity (ability to appeal to a wide variety of student athletes), and flexibility (it is<br />

easy to incorporate new rules and regulations).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on why our school should embrace the trend of<br />

including lacrosse in its sports program. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas,<br />

providing evidence of growth (A graph … shows rapid growth in both male and female<br />

versions) and a rationale for its inclusion (diversity is the sport’s greatest strength and one of<br />

the most flexible high school sports). Appropriate transitions are used (The new nature of the<br />

sport and As a result).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (likened the sport’s stick and would surely garner<br />

support), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (A lacrosse program would result in<br />

well-rounded student athletes for our school). The response varies structure and length of<br />

sentences to control rhythm and pacing (Lacrosse is no longer a niche sport; the entire nation is<br />

experiencing its wide appeal).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (it’s ability<br />

and terminology as well as).<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in meaning.<br />

[58]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – B<br />

[59]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – B<br />

[60]


Anchor Level 5 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a thorough understanding of the documents, stating with all the excitement<br />

surrounding this sport, I think it is time for our school to get involved and to add lacrosse to<br />

our sports program. The response makes clear and explicit connections between the<br />

information and ideas in the documents and the assigned task (Lacrosse participation in the<br />

United States has more than doubled just since 2004 and Lacrosse could provide our other<br />

sports’ teams with an example to follow behaviorly).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, using relevant and specific details from the documents<br />

to discuss the positive aspects of a lacrosse team (Lacrosse is very flexible with rules relating to<br />

its games and players, but is strict when it comes to dealing with bad behavior and The sport<br />

doesn’t encourage just the playing one sport, but it also encourages players participate in and<br />

develop different skills) and the growth of lacrosse (in 2004 almost 60,000 were playing and<br />

participation has increased 44% in the ortheast).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on how we need to get with the times and start a<br />

lacrosse program. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first establishing that<br />

lacrosse is having an explosion of popularity, then discussing its benefits (provide an example,<br />

mixture of different sports, would get those kids involved), and concluding with the appeal that<br />

we need a lacrosse team. Appropriate transitions are used (In 2004 alone, The main reason, A<br />

graph featured … shows).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (The most intriguing and rapidly growing sport in the<br />

United States is lacrosse), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (The numbers and<br />

the people speak for themselves; we need a lacrosse team!). The response varies structure and<br />

length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing (Since 2001, the number of participants has<br />

nearly doubled, and the trend will continue).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (to be, and is;<br />

lacrosse, but also; players, but is) and capitalization (“iche sport” and Community) that do not<br />

hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[61]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

[62]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

[63]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

[64]


Anchor Level 5 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a thorough understanding of the documents, noting that as a sport for all ages, male<br />

and female, lacrosse should … become a part of our school’s extracurriclar activities. The<br />

response makes clear and explicit connections between information and ideas in the documents<br />

and the assigned task (Many parents realize the sport’s versatility and they, too, are fans and a<br />

map of youth participation … also shows similar trends).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently. The response uses relevant and specific details from<br />

the documents to discuss lacrosse’s versatility (Take basketball’s zone defense, soccer’s scoring<br />

techniques, ice hockey’s action, football’s contact, and you’ve defined the sport of lacrosse),<br />

growing popularity (Current trends show the rapid growth and interest), and sportsmanlike<br />

attributes (Positive Coaching Alliance, is trying … by eliminating abusive behavior).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea that we can surely find a way to allow the<br />

sport to be played at the high school level. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas,<br />

first presenting historical development (It’s origin comes from early ative American activity<br />

… but the sport has come to include all), followed by descriptions of lacrosse’s versatility and<br />

growth (participation has increased over 100%) and fan interest trends. Appropriate transitions<br />

are used (While lacrosse may be competitive and agressive and So far, these enforcements).<br />

Uses appropriate language that is sometimes inexact (the team conducting the behavior), with<br />

some awareness of audience and purpose (parents feel the sport isn’t as expensive for their<br />

child to play). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence structure and length<br />

(Fan interest also shows similar trends).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (agresive), punctuation<br />

(it’s … popularity, that since 1982, post season … games), capitalization (genders. only and<br />

football. lacrosse), and usage (In between 2001 and 2005, is due to the fact, behavior to the<br />

sport) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use and conventions.<br />

[65]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – A<br />

[66]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – A<br />

[67]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – A<br />

Anchor Level 4 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents, stating that Lacrosse promotes positive<br />

behavior by all involved, includes skills from various sports and is a growing past-time all<br />

around the nation. The response makes implicit connections between information and ideas in<br />

the documents and the assigned task (Lacrosse is also a growing sport in the United States).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, using relevant and specific details from the documents<br />

to discuss the positive aspects of lacrosse, including the promotion of positive behaviors<br />

(Positive Coaching Alliance and side line managers), component skills (zones, precise passes,<br />

quick action), and growth statistics (58,000 players, 43,000 players, increased 337%).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea of adding Lacrosse to our schools sport’s<br />

program. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first establishing the positive<br />

effects of lacrosse on participants’ behaviors and skill level, followed by a discussion of its<br />

growth. The response lacks internal consistency, abruptly shifting discussion from skills<br />

included in lacrosse to the benefits of playing two sports at once and from statistics on growth<br />

to an appeal to add a Lacrosse team to school’s sports program without appropriate transitions.<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (I would recommend<br />

that our school add Lacrosse to our sports program). The response occasionally makes<br />

effective use of sentence structure and length (The graph shows that Lacrosse has become<br />

extremely propular since the 1980s and continues to grow steadily).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (sportmen-like,<br />

unappriate, oppurtunity), punctuation (players while, also with, womens), capitalization (United<br />

states and Lacrosse), grammar (has only grow and sport … build), and usage (behaviors of and<br />

behaviors to) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in development.<br />

[68]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – B<br />

[69]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – B<br />

[70]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – B<br />

Anchor Level 4 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents, stating that this sport will prove to be<br />

successful, engaging, enjoyable. The response makes implicit connections between information<br />

and ideas in the documents and the assigned task (I can just about guarentee that the sport will<br />

be popular in our school as it is in others locally and nationally).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant details<br />

from the documents to describe lacrosse’s popularity (ot only is the sport escalating on a<br />

school level but its popularity is increasing nationally as well) and appeal (it brings spectators<br />

to their feet with goals). The discussions of sport-related issues and of lacrosse’s history are<br />

less developed.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on reasons that should be enough to convince you to<br />

include lacrosse in the schools Athletes Department budget. The response exhibits a logical<br />

sequence of ideas, presenting its benefits by first noting the popularity will ensure competetion<br />

and school spirit, then explaining how lacrosse can encompass and make use of any athletic<br />

ability and has a tactic that warns people that their behavior is unacceptable. The loosely<br />

connected ideas in the fifth and sixth paragraphs affect internal consistency.<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (Lacrosse is a sport<br />

whose popularity is exploding, and I think we should include ourselves in the hype), although<br />

some inexact phrasing (the advantages of the setups and terminologies are very identical) and<br />

word omissions (I like to propose and For those enjoy) exist. The response occasionally makes<br />

effective use of sentence structure or length (Lacrosse is a sport with unusual approaches to<br />

present day issues that will most likely prove successful).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (competetion and<br />

guarentee), punctuation (In addition it, Americans then later, schools … budget), capitalization<br />

(Lacrosse, High School, Increase), grammar (sport exist and athlete … their), and usage (team<br />

of whom and in 2001 – 2004) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

[71]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – C<br />

[72]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – C<br />

[73]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – C<br />

[74]


Anchor Level 4 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents (the addition of lacrosse to the athletic<br />

program would allow for the school to develop and advance with the times). The response<br />

makes implicit connections between information and ideas in the documents and the assigned<br />

task (With the excitement and thrill of lacrosse it is obvious why the percentages have increased<br />

and As a society the lacrosse craze is sweeping the nation).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant details<br />

from the documents to discuss lacrosse’s appeal (the ability to experiance aspects of many<br />

sports) and growth (In our area … there has been a 44% increase of youth participation). The<br />

ideas of promotion of school spirit, affordability, and safety are less developed.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea that with its increased interest and<br />

likeability lacrosse is a beneficial program for kids. The response exhibits a logical sequence of<br />

ideas, first suggesting that lacrosse be added to the school program, then presenting reasons<br />

why (a sport that has everything will satisfy the needs of most and With this growing talent and<br />

interest), ending with a demand for action. The response is weakened through a lack of<br />

transition when presenting quoted material.<br />

Uses appropriate language, although sometimes inexact (stretch the nation and also<br />

encompassed from outside sports), with some awareness of audience and purpose (With the<br />

athletic department growing a new sport would add to the school spirit). The response exhibits<br />

some attempt to vary sentence structure and length, but with uneven success (The setup is just<br />

like soccer with the feild a net the thrill of a goal).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (guarenteed, equiptment,<br />

banwagon), comma usage (lacrosse he, learn learing, years lacrosses), and grammar (As a<br />

student in this school the addition of lacrosse, could have be found, us students) that do not<br />

hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

weaker in language use.<br />

[75]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – A<br />

[76]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – A<br />

Anchor Level 3 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents, stating that lacrosse is a sport that is rapidly<br />

becoming popular that everyone should love. The response makes few and superficial<br />

connections between information and ideas in the text and the assigned task (Its a sports even<br />

the fan will get into and Lacrosse is often abriviated by Lax). There is no reference to the<br />

graphic.<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant details<br />

from the text to discuss the appeal of lacrosse (If you like man on man contact … then lacrosse<br />

is the sport for you and A socor player or football player can play Lacrosse … and train for the<br />

next season for their sport). The idea of the growing popularity of lacrosse introduced in the<br />

opening paragraph is less developed.<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on the reasons our school should have a Lacrosse team. The<br />

response exhibits a rudimentary structure, starting with a brief introduction, followed by a<br />

loosely constructed body paragraph about the benefits of lacrosse, and concluding with a<br />

summary of reasons and a return to the task.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is sometimes imprecise (Its is rapidly and become professionol<br />

a lacrosse), with little awareness of audience and purpose (Having a Lax team would mean<br />

more compition for our school). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure<br />

and length for effect, but with uneven success (The game can be played by anyone, men, women<br />

child, teenager or adult are all alike).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (soccor, nolledge,<br />

abriviated, opprotunity, intrest) and occasional errors in punctuation (Lacrosse team. A sport;<br />

Its a; competive sport, it will), capitalization (united states and Lacrosse), and usage (to stay fit<br />

… to keep … and train, player … their, to the game, on their off season) that hinder<br />

comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Although the response best fits the criteria for Levels 3 and 4, it remains at Level 3<br />

because the response addresses only one document.<br />

[77]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – B<br />

[78]


Anchor Level 3 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents (It is now starting to become the popular<br />

sport). The response makes few connections between information and ideas in the documents<br />

and the assigned task (Lacrosse should be added to our program because it is a very unique<br />

sport).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some details from the documents to discuss the reasons to make<br />

lacrosse a school sport (During 2004 many sports industries have annsuced that lacrosse<br />

should be the next best sports to watch and Its not only for males but also for females as well).<br />

The response includes some statements that are inaccurate (it is an antidote for sickness) and<br />

unjustified (This helps out parents).<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on adding lacrosse to the athletic department sports program.<br />

The response exhibits a rudimentary structure with a brief introduction and two body<br />

paragraphs. Inconsistencies exist in the second paragraph, which consists of a series of<br />

unrelated facts, moving from behavior control to male and female involvement to world-wide<br />

play. There is no conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (There is also a great program), with little awareness of audience<br />

and purpose (The situation that is described in this essay is about me recommending in a letter).<br />

The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and length for effect, but with<br />

uneven success (The youth leagues and at a high school level are at the same pace).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (annsuced and<br />

envolvement), punctuation (Its becoming, face offs and for football, whats going on), grammar<br />

(the next best sports to watch, this sports, males has increased), and usage (To many people’s<br />

opinion and for teens to professionals) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3 in all qualities.<br />

[79]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – C<br />

[80]


Anchor Level 3 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a basic understanding of the documents, making few connections between information<br />

and ideas in the documents and the assigned task (I would like to inform you of a change I …<br />

would like to see and It all started with the native americans … its popularity is on the rise).<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas (ot only is the sports popularity on the<br />

rise … the antidote to what ails youth sports), but some references to the documents are<br />

unjustified (an increase of 80,000 athletes on the high school level, In the Past year … more<br />

than doubled, extreme safety precautions).<br />

Establishes a focus (it would be silly to not include lacrosse … in this years budget). The<br />

response suggests organization, beginning with two introductory sentences, an assortment of<br />

facts from both documents, and a concluding sentence in one paragraph.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (This popularity is also being seen at the Major league and college<br />

levels). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure for effect, but with<br />

uneven success (Our athletic department is lacking in one sport I feel should be added into the<br />

mix, that sport is Lacrosse).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (other students<br />

would like; the mix, that sport; on the rise but,; on top of that there), capitalization (native<br />

americans, the Past year, to What ails, more exciting than Soccer), and a lack of paragraphing<br />

that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

weaker in development.<br />

[81]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – A<br />

Anchor Level 2 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused or inaccurate understanding of the documents (Lacrosse is known to exist<br />

as a niche in certain of areas in ew York, Baltimore and in ew England). The response<br />

alludes to the documents but makes unwarranted connections to the assigned task (helps<br />

basketball players, football players, baseball player and even ice hockey players impove their<br />

speed, or strength).<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the documents are<br />

vague (rates go up for both males and females) and unjustified (According the text the company<br />

of Cascade had quoted).<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on the idea that lacrosse should be a part of the school’s sport<br />

program. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure, moving from how more and more<br />

children play lacrosse every day to why it should be part of the school’s sports program.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise (his quote informs) for the audience and purpose. The response<br />

reveals little awareness of how to use sentences to achieve an effect (Lacrosse had double its<br />

rates from 2001 to 2005).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (Each Year<br />

lacrosse; text the; speed, or), capitalization (Year; Company; lacross.” his), and usage (certain<br />

of and Company of Cascade) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in organization and conventions.<br />

[82]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – B<br />

[83]


Anchor Level 2 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused understanding of the documents (It is like play football without the stick in<br />

your hand). The response alludes to the documents but makes unwarranted connections to the<br />

assigned task (U.S. Lacross which makes rules an policies for most levels of the game to promet<br />

the sport from $1.1 million to $9 million).<br />

Is largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the documents are vague and irrelevant<br />

(Espn’s CAA Championship coverage over the summer Espn 2 plans).<br />

Suggests a focus (Do you think that we can have lacrosse be part of our school’s sport<br />

program?). The response lacks organization, consisting of a series of loosely connected ideas<br />

about the popularity of lacrosse (locross is a very popular game to play) interrupted by<br />

fragmented comments about football, rules, and revenue.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise (that for “than” and an for “and”). The response reveals little<br />

awareness of how to use sentences to achieve an effect (Players in the U.S. aged 15 and under<br />

estimated to be about 186,000 more that twice what it was in 2001). Several phrases are directly<br />

copied from the text.<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (Athleetes, scine, promet),<br />

comma usage (ago lacross; U.S. aged; 186,000 more; Lacross which; still the), capitalization<br />

(new england and Athleetes), and grammar (Players … estimated to be and It is like play<br />

football) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

[84]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – C<br />

Anchor Level 2 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

[85]<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused understanding of the documents (in year 2004 … Male and Females were<br />

added and the High Schools students and it is 100,000 student). The response alludes to the<br />

documents but makes unwarranted connections to the assigned task (The have the students<br />

parents won’t have To Worrie Becuse it is safer the Football and it’s like BaseBall,<br />

BasketBall).<br />

Is largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the documents are vague (it will have<br />

alot of us playing lacross and it is like the all in one).<br />

Suggests a focus (that is Why we should have Lacross at are school). The response lacks<br />

organization, consisting of one paragraph of three loosely constructed sentences.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise (This is a cuople of Resons why Lacross should Be Part of are<br />

athlitic department and it will Be good For are school). The response reveals little awareness of<br />

how to use sentences to achieve an effect.<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (resson, pouprler, lacross,<br />

alot), punctuation (togathe Male; added and; Lacross so; students parents), and capitalization<br />

(Frist, High Schools, Becuse, Lacross) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 1 – A<br />

Anchor Level 1 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides minimal evidence of understanding (I think that Lacrosse must be a part of school’s<br />

sports programs because I saw a lot of students bored of The Typic school’s sports). The<br />

response makes no connections between information in the documents and the assigned task,<br />

offering only a personal response.<br />

Is minimal, with no evidence of development. The response includes no details from either<br />

document.<br />

Suggests a focus on the idea that lacrosse should be part of the school’s sports program but<br />

lacks organization. The response consists of five loosely related sentences.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (of school’s sports programs and<br />

a new way to Have Fun, is a good sport). The response reveals little awareness of how to use<br />

sentences to achieve an effect (Remember, Sport is Health).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in punctuation (Maybe, … school,<br />

The; Fun, is; Too Remember), capitalization (Have Fun and Happy), grammar (because I saw<br />

and Typic school’s), and usage (bored of and sport to) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Although the response fits criteria for Levels 1 and 2, it remains at Level 1 because<br />

the response makes no reference to any documents.<br />

[86]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 1 – B<br />

Anchor Level 1 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides no evidence of understanding. The response makes no connections between<br />

information in the documents and the assigned task (One of the most famous sport in our school<br />

is Lacrosse).<br />

Is minimal, with no evidence of development.<br />

Shows no organization.<br />

Is minimal. The response’s original language is at times incoherent (I will write about a<br />

program my schools is having to support the school’s athletic department that is planning its<br />

budget has asked for student input).<br />

Is minimal, making assessment of conventions unreliable.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 1 in all qualities.<br />

[87]


Part B — Practice Paper – A<br />

[88]


Part B — Practice Paper – A<br />

[89]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[90]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[91]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[92]


Part B — Practice Paper – C<br />

[93]


Part B — Practice Paper – D<br />

[94]


Part B — Practice Paper – E<br />

[95]


Part B — Practice Paper – E<br />

[96]


Practice Paper A – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper B – Score Level 5<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper C – Score Level 3<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper D – Score Level 2<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper E – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

[97]


COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH<br />

The University of the State of New York<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO<br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION<br />

IN<br />

ENGLISH<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO<br />

Thursday, August 14, 2008 — 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

The last page of this booklet is the answer sheet for the multiple-choice<br />

questions. Fold the last page along the perforations and, slowly and carefully, tear<br />

off the answer sheet. Then fill in the heading of your answer sheet. Now circle<br />

“Session Two” and fill in the heading of each page of your essay booklet.<br />

This session of the examination has two parts. For Part A, you are to answer<br />

all ten multiple-choice questions and write a response, as directed. For Part B, you<br />

are to write a response, as directed.<br />

When you have completed this session of the examination, you must sign the<br />

statement printed at the end of the answer sheet, indicating that you had no<br />

unlawful knowledge of the questions or answers prior to the session and that you<br />

have neither given nor received assistance in answering any of the questions<br />

during the session. Your answer sheet cannot be accepted if you fail to sign this<br />

declaration.<br />

The use of any communications device is strictly prohibited when taking this<br />

examination. If you use any communications device, no matter how briefly, your<br />

examination will be invalidated and no score will be calculated for you.<br />

DO NOT OPEN THIS EXAMINATION BOOKLET UNTIL THE SIGNAL IS GIVEN.<br />

COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH <strong>SESSION</strong> TWO


Part A<br />

Directions: Read the passages on the following pages (an excerpt from an autobiography and an excerpt from<br />

a novel). Write the number of the answer to each multiple-choice question on your answer sheet. Then write<br />

the essay in your essay booklet as described in Your Task. You may use the margins to take notes as you read<br />

and scrap paper to plan your response.<br />

Your Task:<br />

After you have read the passages and answered the multiple-choice questions,<br />

write a unified essay about the effect of a particular location as revealed in the<br />

passages. In your essay, use ideas from both passages to establish a controlling<br />

idea about the effect of a particular location. Using evidence from each<br />

passage, develop your controlling idea and show how the author uses specific<br />

literary elements or techniques to convey that idea.<br />

Guidelines:<br />

Be sure to<br />

• Use ideas from both passages to establish a controlling idea about the effect of a<br />

particular location<br />

• Use specific and relevant evidence from each passage to develop your controlling<br />

idea<br />

• Show how each author uses specific literary elements (for example: theme,<br />

characterization, structure, point of view) or techniques (for example: symbolism,<br />

irony, figurative language) to convey the controlling idea<br />

• Organize your ideas in a logical and coherent manner<br />

• Use language that communicates ideas effectively<br />

• Follow the conventions of standard written English<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [2]


Passage I<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

45<br />

When I left home for college, I sought to escape the provincial 1 world of<br />

farmers, small towns, and country life. I longed for the excitement of the city, for<br />

the intensity that rural life lacked, for adventure beyond the horizon. I dreamed<br />

of exploring the city, living within a new culture and landscape, becoming part of<br />

the pulse of an urban jungle.<br />

Yet some of my best times were driving home, leaving the city behind and<br />

slipping back into the valley. As city life faded and traffic thinned, I could see the<br />

faces of the other drivers relax. Then, around a bend in the highway, the<br />

rangelands of the valley would materialize, revealing a horizon of gentle rolling<br />

mounds. The land seemed eternal and permanent. I felt as if I had stepped back<br />

in time.<br />

I took comfort in the stability of the valley. Driving through small farm<br />

communities, I imagined the founding families still rooted in their stately homes,<br />

generations working the same lands, neighbors remaining neighbors for<br />

generations. Small farms dominated the vista. I allowed familiar barn and<br />

farmhouse landmarks to guide me.<br />

Close to home, I often turned off the main highway and took different routes,<br />

reacquainting myself with farms and testing my memory. Friends lived in those<br />

houses. I had eaten meals and spent time there; I had worked on some of these<br />

farms, lending a hand during a peak harvest, helping a family friend for a day or<br />

two. The houses and lands looked the same, and I could picture the gentle faces<br />

and hear familiar voices as if little had been altered. As I eased into our driveway<br />

I’d revert to old ways, becoming a son once again, a child on the family farm.<br />

My feelings were honest and real. But my eyes deceived me, tainted by my<br />

longing for a touchstone—a land where life stood still and my memories could be<br />

relived. When I left the farm for college, I could only return as a visitor to the<br />

valley, a traveler looking for home.<br />

Now the farm is once again my true home. I live in that farmhouse and work<br />

the eternal lands. My world may seem unchanged to casual observers, but they<br />

are wrong. I now know this: if there’s a constant on these farms, it’s the constant<br />

of change.<br />

The keen observer will recognize the differences. A farmer replants an<br />

orchard with a new variety of peaches. Drip irrigation is added to a block of old<br />

grapes, so I imagine the vineyard has a new owner—perhaps a younger farmer<br />

with many more years ahead to recover the costs—or the farm is now part of a<br />

larger operation with capital reserves to finance the improvement. Occasionally<br />

the changes are clearly evident, like a FOR SALE sign. But I need to read the<br />

small print in order to discern if the seller is a bank that foreclosed on the farmer.<br />

Most of the changes contain two stories. One is the physical alteration of the<br />

farm, the other involves the people on that land, the human story behind the<br />

change.<br />

I’ve been back on the farm for a decade and still haven’t heard all the stories<br />

behind the changes around me. But once I add my stories to the landscape, I can<br />

call this place my home, a home that continues to evolve and change as I add<br />

more and more of my stories.<br />

1 provincial — restricted in interest or outlook<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [3] [OVER]


50<br />

A poet returns to the valley and proclaims, “How closed-minded you all are.”<br />

He comments about the lack of interest in the arts, in social and environmental<br />

issues, in the poverty and inequality of our life. “Little has changed in the valley.”<br />

He was born and raised here, which supposedly grants him license to criticize<br />

and lecture us. Yet he speaks for many who think they know the valley.<br />

How differently would others think of us if they knew the stories of a raisin<br />

harvest in a wet year or a peach without a home?…<br />

—David Mas Masumoto<br />

excerpted from Epitaph for a Peach, 1995<br />

HarperSanFrancisco<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [4]


Passage II<br />

5<br />

10<br />

15<br />

20<br />

25<br />

30<br />

35<br />

40<br />

…We went there every year for our summer holidays. I do not suppose, now,<br />

that it was a very large house, but it seemed enormous then. I had a nursery on<br />

the top floor and every morning I woke up there, except for the day or two before<br />

the horrid end of the holidays, seemed a renewal of happiness. In my memory<br />

the sun always shone at Blithbury though I do not think there was really anything<br />

especially remarkable about the climate in Staffordshire in the 1920s.<br />

My parents lived in the South of France for most of the year. It was their<br />

home, but for me home was not on the Riviera but at Blithbury. When I went<br />

there twice a year on leave from school, I would be looked after by my<br />

redoubtable 1 aunt, who lived there all the time and was the merriest of spinsters 2 .<br />

When the car collecting me from the station turned the corner into the little park<br />

and I saw the house in the distance I would feel I was back where I belonged.<br />

I remember the house with almost painful clarity. I am sure it was Blithbury<br />

that gave me the feeling for beauty which for me is one of the most important<br />

values in the world. Everything there was calculated to please, from the panelled<br />

hall with its portraits of our rather brief lineage supplemented by a few<br />

eighteenth-century ladies and gentlemen who came with the house, to the narrow,<br />

creaking housemaids’ corridor, scrubbed by generations of Staffordshire lasses.<br />

My aunt kept the house in impeccable order, and it was filled with a sense of<br />

cleanliness and care. It had a smell of beeswax, and soap, and roses, and old<br />

leather, at least I suppose those were the ingredients. I have hardly found that<br />

smell anywhere else and nowadays it probably scarcely exists.<br />

The library was my favourite room. It had been added to an older house in<br />

the late eighteenth century, by James Wyatt 3 we liked to think. It retained its<br />

original bookcases and a marble chimneypiece with rams’ heads in the corners,<br />

and everything in the room, the curtains, the carpets, the backs of the books,<br />

seemed to have faded to the same soft honey colour. It had a large table for a<br />

dozen readers, but there were seldom any readers there apart from me. Even on<br />

the brightest days, when sun and sports beckoned, I found myself drawn to the<br />

library, wanting to read everything in the world, impelled by the pleasures and<br />

dangers and excitements awaiting me between the covers of books. It became<br />

known as my room, and when I was needed someone always looked for me in the<br />

library.<br />

The garden I loved almost as much. The house stood on a little hill, with<br />

hanging woods (on a modest scale) beneath it. Stretching to the south was a series<br />

of lakes, connected by streams with little bridges over them. Huge elms overhung<br />

the lakes, and in summer when one rowed or punted around, one seemed to be<br />

in an enchanted landscape, shaded by great trees, with lapping water all around<br />

one and in the distance the prospect of smiling countryside where nonetheless<br />

giants might lurk. During those afternoons, the lakes would be almost silent, with<br />

only the wood pigeons to disturb the stillness.<br />

Recently, the house was destroyed. Nobody wants to live now in a place<br />

devoted to beauty, and elegance, and peace. They prefer to live in bungalows 4<br />

along the arterial road. And with the house my childhood disappeared, too.<br />

—Giles Waterfield<br />

excerpted from The Long Afternoon, 2000<br />

Review<br />

1 redoubtable — inspiring reverence<br />

2 spinster — an unmarried woman<br />

3 James Wyatt — a famous eighteenth-century architect<br />

4 bungalow — a one-story cottage<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [5] [OVER]


Multiple-Choice Questions<br />

Directions (1–10): Select the best suggested answer to each question and write its number in the space<br />

provided on the answer sheet. The questions may help you think about the ideas and information you might<br />

want to use in your essay. You may return to these questions anytime you wish.<br />

Passage I (the autobiographical excerpt) —<br />

Questions 1–5 refer to Passage I.<br />

Passage II (the novel excerpt) — Questions 6–10<br />

refer to Passage II.<br />

1 The narrator originally views his move to college<br />

as a benefit because he can<br />

(1) earn more money<br />

(2) have new experiences<br />

(3) meet some celebrities<br />

(4) make many friends<br />

2 In lines 22 and 23, the narrator’s return to the<br />

family brings about a change in his<br />

(1) self-image (3) time schedule<br />

(2) personal finances (4) well-being<br />

6 The narrator is telling the story of Blithbury Hall<br />

from the perspective of<br />

(1) an owner (3) a developer<br />

(2) an adult (4) a judge<br />

7 Where does the narrator believe that his<br />

appreciation of beauty was developed?<br />

(1) in his aunt’s mansion<br />

(2) at a French villa<br />

(3) at his boarding school<br />

(4) in a local bungalow<br />

3 In lines 30 and 31, the nature of change on farms<br />

is emphasized through the use of<br />

(1) personification (3) irony<br />

(2) simile (4) hyperbole<br />

8 The narrator reinforces the idea of “cleanliness<br />

and care” (line 20) through his use of<br />

(1) situational irony (3) sensory imagery<br />

(2) direct quotation (4) extended metaphor<br />

4 In lines 33 through 36, the narrator implies that<br />

decisions about farms are primarily driven by<br />

(1) economics (3) weather<br />

(2) education (4) legislation<br />

5 The narrator believes that the poet’s criticism of<br />

the valley is based on the poet’s<br />

(1) environmental activity<br />

(2) prejudiced acquaintances<br />

(3) difficult childhood<br />

(4) limited viewpoint<br />

9 In line 40, the word “giants” seems to suggest a<br />

(1) sailor’s warning<br />

(2) future problem<br />

(3) child’s imagination<br />

(4) modern achievement<br />

10 According to the narrator, Blithbury Hall was<br />

destroyed because of<br />

(1) financial problems (3) ongoing wars<br />

(2) natural disasters (4) current attitudes<br />

After you have finished these questions, turn to page 2. Review Your Task and the<br />

Guidelines. Use scrap paper to plan your response. Then write your response to Part A,<br />

beginning on page 1 of your essay booklet. After you finish your response for Part A, go on to<br />

page 7 of your examination booklet and complete Part B.<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [6]


Part B<br />

Your Task:<br />

Write a critical essay in which you discuss two works of literature you have read from the particular perspective<br />

of the statement that is provided for you in the Critical Lens. In your essay, provide a valid interpretation of<br />

the statement, agree or disagree with the statement as you have interpreted it, and support your opinion using<br />

specific references to appropriate literary elements from the two works. You may use scrap paper to plan your<br />

response. Write your essay in Part B, beginning on page 7 of the essay booklet.<br />

Critical Lens:<br />

“The real hero is always a hero by mistake…”<br />

—Umberto Eco<br />

Travels in Hyperreality, 1986<br />

Guidelines:<br />

Be sure to<br />

• Provide a valid interpretation of the critical lens that clearly establishes the criteria<br />

for analysis<br />

• Indicate whether you agree or disagree with the statement as you have interpreted it<br />

• Choose two works you have read that you believe best support your opinion<br />

• Use the criteria suggested by the critical lens to analyze the works you have chosen<br />

• Avoid plot summary. Instead, use specific references to appropriate literary<br />

elements (for example: theme, characterization, setting, point of view) to develop<br />

your analysis<br />

• Organize your ideas in a unified and coherent manner<br />

• Specify the titles and authors of the literature you choose<br />

• Follow the conventions of standard written English<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [7]


The University of the State of New York<br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

Tear Here<br />

COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION IN ENGLISH<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO<br />

Thursday, August 14, 2008 — 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

ANSWER SHEET<br />

Student . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sex: ■ Male ■ Female<br />

School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Grade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Teacher . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

Write your answers to the multiple-choice questions for Part A on this answer sheet.<br />

Part A<br />

1 _______ 6 _______<br />

2 _______ 7 _______<br />

3 _______ 8 _______<br />

4 _______ 9 _______<br />

5 _______ 10 _______<br />

HAND IN THIS ANSWER SHEET WITH YOUR ESSAY BOOKLET,<br />

SCRAP PAPER, AND EXAMINATION BOOKLET.<br />

Your essay responses for Part A and Part B should be written in the essay booklet.<br />

Tear Here<br />

I do hereby affirm, at the close of this examination, that I had no unlawful knowledge of the questions or answers prior to the examination and<br />

that I have neither given nor received assistance in answering any of the questions during the examination.<br />

Comp. Eng. — Session Two – Aug. ’08 [11]<br />

____________________________________________________________<br />

Signature


<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO<br />

FOR TEACHERS ONLY<br />

The University of the State of New York<br />

REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION<br />

E<br />

ENGLISH<br />

Thursday, August 14, 2008— 8:30 to 11:30 a.m., only<br />

SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE<br />

Mechanics of Rating<br />

Updated information regarding the rating of this examination may be posted on the<br />

New York State Education Department’s web site during the rating period. Check this<br />

web site http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/osa/ and select the link “Examination Scoring<br />

Information” for any recently posted information regarding this examination. This site<br />

should be checked before the rating process for this examination begins and several times<br />

throughout the Regents examination period.<br />

The following procedures are to be used for rating papers in the Comprehensive<br />

Examination in English. More detailed directions for the organization of the rating<br />

process and procedures for rating the examination are included in the Information<br />

Booklet for Administering and Scoring the Comprehensive Examination in English.<br />

Scoring of Multiple-Choice Questions<br />

Indicate by means of a check mark each incorrect or omitted answer to multiplechoice<br />

questions on the Session Two answer sheet; do not place a check mark beside<br />

a correct answer. Use only red ink or red pencil. In the box provided under each<br />

part, record the number of questions the student answered correctly for that part.<br />

Transfer the number of correct answers for the Part A multiple-choice questions to<br />

the appropriate spaces in the box in the upper right corner of each student’s<br />

<strong>SESSION</strong> <strong>ONE</strong> answer sheet.<br />

Session Two<br />

Correct Answers<br />

Part A<br />

(1) 2<br />

(2) 1<br />

(3) 3<br />

(4) 1<br />

(5) 4<br />

(6) 2<br />

(7) 1<br />

(8) 3<br />

(9) 3<br />

(10) 4<br />

The University of the State of New York • THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT • Albany, New York 12234


COMPREHENSIVE ENGLISH — <strong>SESSION</strong> TWO — continued<br />

Rating of Essays<br />

(1) Follow your school’s procedures for training for rating. This process should include:<br />

Introduction to the task—<br />

• Raters read the task and summarize its purpose, audience, and format<br />

• Raters read passage(s) and plan own response to task<br />

• Raters share response plans and summarize expectations for student responses<br />

Introduction to the rubric and anchor papers—<br />

• Trainer reviews rubric with reference to the task<br />

• Trainer reviews procedures for assigning scores<br />

• Trainer leads review of each anchor paper and commentary<br />

(Note: Anchor papers are ordered from high to low within each score level.)<br />

Practice scoring individually—<br />

• Raters score a set of five papers individually<br />

• Trainer records scores and leads discussion until raters feel confident enough to move<br />

on to actual scoring<br />

(2) When actual rating begins, each rater should record his or her individual rating for a<br />

student’s essay on the rating sheet provided, not directly on the student’s essay or<br />

answer sheet. Do not correct the student’s work by making insertions or changes of any<br />

kind.<br />

(3) Each essay must be rated by at least two raters; a third rater will be necessary to resolve<br />

scores that differ by more than one point. The scoring coordinator will be responsible<br />

for coordinating the movement of papers, calculating a final score for each student’s<br />

essay, and recording that information on the student’s answer paper for Session One,<br />

and determining the student’s final score for the examination. The chart located on the<br />

Department’s web site should be used for determining the final examination score.<br />

[2]


<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO – PART A – SCORING RUBRIC<br />

READING AND WRITING FOR LITERARY RESPONSE<br />

QUALITY<br />

Meaning: the extent to<br />

which the response<br />

exhibits sound<br />

understanding,<br />

interpretation, and<br />

analysis of the task<br />

and text(s)<br />

6<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-establish a controlling<br />

idea that reveals an indepth<br />

analysis of both<br />

texts<br />

-make insightful<br />

connections between the<br />

controlling idea and the<br />

ideas in each text<br />

5<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-establish a controlling<br />

idea that reveals a<br />

thorough understanding<br />

of both texts<br />

-make clear and explicit<br />

connections between the<br />

controlling idea and the<br />

ideas in each text<br />

4<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-establish a controlling<br />

idea that shows a basic<br />

understanding of both<br />

texts<br />

-make implicit<br />

connections between the<br />

controlling idea and the<br />

ideas in each text<br />

3<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-establish a controlling<br />

idea that shows a basic<br />

understanding of the<br />

texts<br />

-make few or superficial<br />

connections between the<br />

controlling idea and the<br />

ideas in the texts<br />

2<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-convey a confused or<br />

incomplete<br />

understanding of the<br />

texts<br />

-make a few connections<br />

but fail to establish a<br />

controlling idea<br />

Development: the<br />

extent to which ideas<br />

are elaborated using<br />

specific and relevant<br />

evidence from the<br />

text(s)<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and fully, making<br />

effective use of a wide<br />

range of relevant and<br />

specific evidence and<br />

appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and consistently, with<br />

reference to relevant and<br />

specific evidence and<br />

appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop some ideas<br />

more fully than others,<br />

with reference to<br />

specific and relevant<br />

evidence and<br />

appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop ideas briefly,<br />

using some evidence<br />

from the texts<br />

-may rely primarily on<br />

plot summary<br />

-are incomplete or<br />

largely undeveloped,<br />

hinting at ideas, but<br />

references to the text are<br />

vague, irrelevant,<br />

repetitive, or unjustified<br />

Organization: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

direction, shape, and<br />

coherence<br />

-maintain the focus<br />

established by the<br />

controlling idea<br />

-exhibit a logical and<br />

coherent structure<br />

through skillful use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain the focus<br />

established by the<br />

controlling idea<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas<br />

through use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas but<br />

may lack internal<br />

consistency<br />

-establish, but fail to<br />

maintain, an appropriate<br />

focus<br />

- exhibit a rudimentary<br />

structure but may<br />

include some<br />

inconsistencies or<br />

irrelevancies<br />

-lack an appropriate<br />

focus but suggest some<br />

organization, or suggest<br />

a focus but lack<br />

organization<br />

Language Use: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response reveals an<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose through<br />

effective use of words,<br />

sentence structure,<br />

and sentence variety<br />

-are stylistically<br />

sophisticated, using<br />

language that is precise<br />

and engaging, with a<br />

notable sense of voice<br />

and awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

enhance meaning<br />

-use language that is<br />

fluent and original, with<br />

evident awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and<br />

pacing<br />

-use appropriate<br />

language, with some<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose<br />

-occasionally make<br />

effective use of sentence<br />

structure or length<br />

-rely on basic<br />

vocabulary, with little<br />

awareness of audience<br />

or purpose<br />

-exhibit some attempt to<br />

vary sentence structure<br />

or length for effect, but<br />

with uneven success<br />

-use language that is<br />

imprecise or unsuitable<br />

for the audience or<br />

purpose<br />

-reveal little awareness<br />

of how to use sentences<br />

to achieve an effect<br />

Conventions: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

conventional spelling,<br />

punctuation,<br />

paragraphing,<br />

capitalization,<br />

grammar, and usage<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions with<br />

essentially no errors,<br />

even with sophisticated<br />

language<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions,<br />

exhibiting occasional<br />

errors only when using<br />

sophisticated language<br />

-demonstrate partial<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that do<br />

not hinder<br />

comprehension<br />

-demonstrate emerging<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that<br />

hinder comprehension<br />

-demonstrate a lack of<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

frequent errors that make<br />

comprehension difficult<br />

• If the student addresses only one text, the response can be scored no higher than a 3.<br />

• If the student writes only a personal response and makes no reference to the text(s), the response can be scored no higher than a 1.<br />

• Responses totally unrelated to the topic, illegible, incoherent, or blank should be given a 0.<br />

• A response totally copied from the text(s) with no original student writing should be scored a 0.<br />

1<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide minimal or no<br />

evidence of textual<br />

understanding<br />

-make no connections<br />

between the texts or<br />

among ideas in the texts<br />

-are minimal, with no<br />

evidence of development<br />

-show no focus or<br />

organization<br />

-are minimal<br />

-use language that is<br />

incoherent or<br />

inappropriate<br />

-are minimal, making<br />

assessment of<br />

conventions unreliable<br />

-may be illegible or not<br />

recognizable as English<br />

[3]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – A<br />

[4]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – A<br />

[5]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – A<br />

Anchor Level 6 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that reveals an in-depth analysis of both texts, stating that certain<br />

significant places can stir up bittersweet emotions and that memories of such places evoke<br />

feelings of both pain and pleasure. The response makes insightful connections between the<br />

controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (By the conclusion of the recollection, the reader<br />

recognizes both the pain … and the pleasure … these memories trigger for the narrator) and<br />

Passage II (For the narrator, the pleasure of Blithbury was the appreciation for beauty it<br />

instilled in him; the pain of Blithbury was its impermanence).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

evidence from Passage I (College afforded the narrator the daring opportunity to transition<br />

from family farm to city life and He realizes much has changed, but he is accepting of it) and<br />

from Passage II (the narrator shares his fond recollections and he returns us abruptly to the<br />

present, when he reveals that the house has been destroyed). The response uses irony in<br />

Passage I to show the narrator’s attitude toward change and flashback and sensory imagery in<br />

Passage II to show the details of the house which provided comfort to the narrator.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the controlling idea on the emotional impact of childhood<br />

locations. The response exhibits a logical and coherent structure, moving from the initial<br />

emotional reaction of each narrator (initial feelings of discontent and Just a view of the house<br />

… gave him a feeling of security and well-being) to their later reactions (He seems eager to<br />

make his own changes and The last line of Passage II is sadly nostalgic). Appropriate devices<br />

and transitions are skillfully used (Usually, Moreover, Just when).<br />

Is stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging (paint word pictures,<br />

shaped by the limitations, lured the reader), with a notable sense of voice and awareness of<br />

audience and purpose. The response varies structure and length of sentences to enhance<br />

meaning (Returning to a place of emotional significance and finding it gone is difficult).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6 in all qualities.<br />

[6]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

[7]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

[8]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 6 – B<br />

Anchor Level 6 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that reveals an in-depth analysis of both texts, stating that location<br />

plays a critical role in each writer’s recollection and interpretation of his childhood<br />

experience. The response makes insightful connections between the controlling idea and the<br />

ideas in Passage I (He travelled to the city for adventure but now, ironically, he finds excitement<br />

at home) and Passage II (the values he learned at Blithbury are with him wherever he goes).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

evidence from Passage I (As a youth, the writer assumed that the familiar farms and way of life<br />

were eternal and he decides to not just visit, but to remain on the farm) and Passage II<br />

(Blithbury, a large country estate in the English countryside, was the place where the writer felt<br />

he most belonged and He … brings the reader with him to admire the “enchanted landscape”).<br />

The response uses appropriate literary elements (theme, irony, and point-of-view) from Passage<br />

I and (point-of-view) from Passage II to further the analysis.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the controlling idea that the narrators appreciate the impact<br />

of location on their lives. The response exhibits a logical and coherent structure, moving from<br />

location as a general idea to specific examples of its interaction with characters or events in<br />

Passage I (He feels himself not just going back to the land, but also going back to his old self)<br />

and in Passage II (But the impact of this location on the writer’s life is no less pervasive and<br />

important). Appropriate devices and transitions are skillfully used (However and It is not).<br />

Is stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging (There are times when<br />

setting does not just provide a context for action and understanding, but when it is central to<br />

both), with a notable sense of voice and awareness of audience and purpose. The response<br />

varies structure and length of sentences to enhance meaning (What was once boring is now<br />

comforting. Instead of longing for action, he enjoys peace).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (forclosures<br />

and compells) and punctuation (adventure but and back but) only when using sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[9]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – A<br />

[10]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – A<br />

Anchor Level 5 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that reveals a thorough understanding of both texts by stating that<br />

a sense of belonging … imparts comfort, security and happiness because a person is in a place<br />

that is familiar. The response makes clear and explicit connections between the controlling idea<br />

and ideas in each text (In both passages, the narrators feel this sense of belonging when they<br />

return to a particular location … the family farm or a favorite house from childhood).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence (in<br />

Passage I, the narrator … realized that he missed the countryside and his times at Blithbury<br />

were the happiest). The response builds a discussion of Passage I and Passage II around the<br />

literary devices of visual imagery (the honey-colored library decor, the garden full of lakes,<br />

bridges, elms), the ironic “constant of change”, adult point of view, and characterization (both<br />

were permanently shaped by their particular locations).<br />

Maintains the focus established by the controlling idea that everyone longs for a place to fit-in,<br />

to be safe, to be happy. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, introducing the<br />

universal feeling of belonging, expanding on the narrator of Passage I, whose feeling of<br />

emptyness in “the urban jungle” is relieved by his return home, and the narrator of Passage II,<br />

whose frequent visits to his aunt’s mansion … taught him what beauty meant. Appropriate<br />

transitions are used (For example, By the end, When his house, The other narrator).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original, with evident awareness of audience and purpose (new<br />

neighbors … gradually modernized agriculture, he can describe countless details, his<br />

childhood self reading in the library, now mourns its loss). The response varies structure and<br />

length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing (He is a loyal son, a helpful neighbor and a<br />

story-writing farmer).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (emptyness<br />

and fit-in) and agreement in verb tense (he comes … and realized).<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5 in all qualities.<br />

[11]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – B<br />

[12]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – B<br />

[13]


Anchor Level 5 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that reveals a thorough understanding of both texts (People’s hearts<br />

can be connected to particular locations). The response makes clear and explicit connections<br />

between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (When he finally returned he realized how<br />

much the country meant to him, it would always be his home) and Passage II (The mansion … was<br />

his home … it was his childhood as well).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence from<br />

Passage I to explain the narrator’s attitude (He is proud to be part of this beautiful country life and<br />

defends it’s growth) and from Passage II to describe the effect of the well kept home and land<br />

surrounding the house and how it was capable of taking the narrator to an “enchanted landscape”.<br />

The response refers to appropriate literary elements from both texts, citing the countryside as a<br />

symbol of his childhood in Passage I, and identifying the imagery and the tone in Passage II.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the controlling idea on the deep emotional connection between<br />

the narrator’s hearts and the land in which they grew up. The response exhibits a logical sequence<br />

of ideas, first addressing in Passage I the narrator’s desire to leave the country life and his<br />

realizations upon his return (He now holds dear the countryside) and then the emotional tie<br />

between the narrator of Passage II and Blithbury, and concluding that both locations greatly<br />

impacted the narrators. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas through use of<br />

appropriate devices and transitions (When he finally returned, Instead of, Both locations).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (memories provide sensations like pride and reverence,<br />

with a hint of resentment, his initial longing to escape the confinements of “provincial” country<br />

life), with some lapses (He … remorses and ostracizing himself) and evident awareness of<br />

audience and purpose. The response varies structure and length of sentences to control rhythm and<br />

pacing (The location where the house used to stand now brings back sorrowful, wistful memories).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (melencoly and Blithberry),<br />

punctuation (home, passage; meant to him, it; it’s growth), and usage (resentment to and in which<br />

the grew up in) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[14]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – C<br />

[15]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 5 – C<br />

Anchor Level 5 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that reveals a thorough understanding of both texts (to express the<br />

… lasting effects a home can have on a person and that for both narrators these effects are a<br />

positive effect). The response makes clear and explicit connections between the controlling idea<br />

and Passage I (the rural scenery he loved and cherished from childhood) and Passage II<br />

(Explaining, thoroughly, the beautiful and unforgettable memories he had as a child, it is very<br />

apparent that his outlook on his childhood home is positive).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence from<br />

Passage I to describe the country’s beauty (as he drives around the bend … gentle rolling<br />

mounds and familiar family farms) and from Passage II the effect of the environment on the<br />

narrator (These words paint a gorgeous picture of the harmony and peace that he would feel<br />

every time he was in Blithbury). The response uses appropriate literary elements from both<br />

texts, identifying descriptive imagery and the farmland’s “constant of change” which is so<br />

ironic in Passage I and sensory images and personification in Passage II.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the feelings and passion shown by the narrators for<br />

their homes. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, moving from a thoughtful<br />

introductory question to a thorough discussion of each passage, and to the conclusion that the<br />

impact of these two insightful descriptions is truly lasting. The discussion of the author<br />

symbolized as “a peach without a home” detracts from internal consistency.<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (now been torn from him, perhaps dull to outsiders, he<br />

once lived dreams in), with evident awareness of audience and purpose. The response varies<br />

structure and length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing (Both authors share a common<br />

passion for these places).<br />

Demonstrates partial control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in grammar (use<br />

… help and uses … would) only when using sophisticated language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in organization.<br />

[16]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – A<br />

[17]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – A<br />

[18]


Anchor Level 4 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of both texts, stating that where<br />

people live and grow up greatly affects their personalities and mental well being. The response<br />

makes implicit connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (This shows<br />

that country life really is calming because it is more peaceful and relaxing) and in Passage II<br />

(The narrator seems to become happier and more excited when he discusses his aunt’s house).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response refers to specific and relevant<br />

evidence to discuss the effect of location on one’s well being in Passage I, stating that when the<br />

narrator returns to the farm from college, he realizes he missed the familiarity of country life<br />

and in Passage II, stating that the narrator loved everything about his aunt’s house and this<br />

house made him feel safe and secure. The response makes reference to theme in Passage I (The<br />

theme of passage one is once the narrator got to the city he just wanted to go back home) and to<br />

characterization in Passage II, although characterization is not developed.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the controlling idea on people who grow up some place they<br />

love being. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first addressing, in Passage I, the<br />

narrator’s move to an urban area and his reaction to city life (once the narrator got to the city he<br />

just wanted to go back home) and then discussing, in Passage II, the narrator’s appreciation of<br />

his time spent at Blithbury (He hated being away from it nomatter where he went), followed by<br />

a summary conclusion. Transitions are appropriate (In the first passage, In the second passage,<br />

In conclusion).<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (The idea that a<br />

place affects a persons personality and well being is shown in the first passage with the literary<br />

element theme). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence length (He is able to<br />

describe all of these details about the house).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting frequent errors in punctuation (city they; to visit he<br />

realizes; his aunt’s house, the rooms; busy stressful area they; being they are happy) that do<br />

not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in organization.<br />

[19]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – B<br />

[20]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – B<br />

[21]


Anchor Level 4 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of both texts, stating that in both<br />

of these passages, the narrators feel a sense of home within a certain location as well as a<br />

sense of belonging. The response makes implicit connections between the controlling idea and<br />

the ideas in the Passage I (The narrator longs for childhood, where his life was less<br />

complicated) and in Passage II (It was his home and gave him a sense of belonging).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response refers to specific and relevant<br />

evidence from both texts to discuss the significance of a childhood home (Returning to his farm<br />

allows him to return to his youth and The boy saw the beauty in the world by living here, and<br />

learned to appreciate it). The response suggests characterization in the first passage (He is<br />

learning to become independent while at the same time, attempting to retain his boyish youth)<br />

but makes no reference to literary elements in Passage II.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the significance of a home and belonging. The<br />

response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first addressing in Passage I the narrator’s<br />

enjoyment of the stability of the valley, the familiarity of it and in Passage II the importance of<br />

his aunt’s mansion in the country. The response concludes that as people grow and mature and<br />

reflect upon their childhood, they realize how much beauty there is in the world.<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (Both authors, by<br />

living in these location have a better understanding of not only themselves, but the world as<br />

well). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence length (This is true<br />

everywhere).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (farm, leaves; while<br />

the; capsule, but; here, and) and usage (reflection on their background) that do not hinder<br />

comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

[22]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 4 – C<br />

[23]


Anchor Level 4 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of both texts, stating that home<br />

is not just a place you reside, but a place that resides in you. The response makes implicit<br />

connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (As he arrived home, he<br />

noticed some changes made around his home, but realized his home was still his home) and in<br />

Passage II (His memories of the times spent at the mansion were painfully clear … he<br />

remembered it all).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some evidence from Passage I (the speaker was excited to travel<br />

into the city and Though his experiences were wonderful for him, he still found himself having<br />

some of his best times driving home) and from Passage II (the speaker is recalling old<br />

childhood memories from his Aunt’s Mansion and Even though he spent little time there, he was<br />

quick to name it his home). The response makes no reference to literary elements or techniques.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea of a home. The response exhibits a logical<br />

sequence of ideas, first addressing in Passage I the realization that the narrator’s home remains<br />

in his heart, then addressing in Passage II the idea that the narrator remembers every room in<br />

the house, and concluding that each passage illustrates two differences about the idea of a<br />

home, and each is right. Internal consistency is weakened through the use of an ineffective final<br />

transition (Although … it is proven in Passage II … Each passage)<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (Whether it is a place<br />

in which you have lived your whole life, or a place that you spend little time at but love to be,<br />

each one may be called a home). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence<br />

structure (He loved racing out of the urban jungle and taking comfort in the stability of the<br />

valley, for it was a place he knew).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in semicolons (home; the place and<br />

home; whether), commas (home, but and clear, from), capitalization (Aunt’s Mansion), and<br />

grammar (each speaker is discussing their home) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

weaker in development.<br />

[24]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – A<br />

[25]


Anchor Level 3 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of the texts (Passage 1 and<br />

Passage 2 are about how a change in location can change one’s attitude). The response makes<br />

superficial connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (The changing<br />

harvests and new technology were more than enough change for the author) and in Passage II<br />

(the author’s outlook changes when she goes to her summer house in Strattsfordshire).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some evidence from the texts (The author discusses desiring a<br />

change and seeking that change in an urban city and She says the weather is always sunny and<br />

the garden is like an oasis). The response makes no reference to literary elements or techniques.<br />

Establishes an appropriate focus on how a different location can change a person’s outlook. The<br />

response exhibits a rudimentary four-paragraph structure, but includes some irrelevancies (As<br />

the saying goes, “you always want what you don’t have” and everyone is happy).<br />

Uses appropriate language (Location dictates how people live everyday), with some awareness<br />

of audience and purpose. The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence length (A<br />

change in location can alter the way one feels).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in comma use (change, and seeking<br />

and trees hang perfectly and) and grammar (there was more change) that do not hinder<br />

comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in language use and conventions.<br />

[26]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – B<br />

[27]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – B<br />

Anchor Level 3 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of the texts (When people go on<br />

in life, what they have left behind may begin to change). The response makes superficial<br />

connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (When he left home … he<br />

came back to next to nothing). The connection to Passage II is less clear (Passage II discusses<br />

how a young boy and his parents would go away every summer).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some evidence from the texts (He goes away to school and<br />

realizes how important home really is and He would describe every inch of the relaxing beauty)<br />

with an unjustified reference to the “FOR SALE” sign. The response makes no reference to literary<br />

elements or techniques.<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus on how a location can change with time.<br />

The response exhibits a rudimentary structure, first addressing, in Passage I, a location’s effect<br />

on the narrator (the way you grow up really has an impact on ones self-image), then discussing,<br />

in Passage II, the beauty of the location (They would go somewhere beautiful), and concluding<br />

that people move on in life not realizing what they are leaving behind.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (As time goes by people move on and your gonna go back), with<br />

some imprecision (This narrats how, quite for “quiet,” your for “you’re”), and little awareness<br />

of audience and purpose. The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and<br />

length for effect, but with uneven success (But where they made those memories may be gone).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (As time goes by<br />

people, ones, life not) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

[28]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 3 – C<br />

[29]


Anchor Level 3 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

The response:<br />

Commentary<br />

Establishes a controlling idea that shows a basic understanding of the texts (Location playes a<br />

large effect on the mind setting of a paticular individual). The response makes superficial<br />

connections between the controlling idea and the ideas in Passage I (In lines 6 to 11 the author<br />

tries to show why the location of his favorite place is so wonderfull to him). There is no<br />

discussion of Passage II.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to Passage I are vague<br />

(Their true love was in the country where they grew up and nothing could change that and The<br />

author also uses imagery). There is no development of Passage II. While the response makes<br />

reference to literary elements (Passage 1 uses imagery and theme while passage 2 uses imagery<br />

and symbolism), they are undeveloped.<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus on the effect of location on a person’s<br />

state of mind. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure, first addressing the narrator’s<br />

discovery that city life wasnt what they really wanted, and then describing the country as a care<br />

free zone. There is no conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (The author has a great messege to get out) that is sometimes<br />

imprecise (their for “there,” his farm town country, your for “you’re”). The response exhibits<br />

some attempt to vary sentence structure and length for effect, but with uneven success (A place<br />

where you can feel like yourself in every way).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (oppurtunity, excitment,<br />

aquanted, becaue) and punctuation (get their you forget, authors view points, hes) that hinder<br />

comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

[30]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – A<br />

[31]


Anchor Level 2 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused and incomplete understanding of the texts (The Main Character describes<br />

Many things that is seen at these Many places visitied). The response makes a few connections<br />

to Passage I (The main purpose for the Main Character To go off to College was to learn more<br />

and get a good experience, but When he returned home things weren’t the same) but fails to<br />

establish a controlling idea other than paraphrasing the task.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the texts are vague<br />

(The main Character went off to College, it gave him different experiences in culture and in life<br />

in general and In the second passage was speaking about going on summer vactions). The<br />

response makes no reference to literary elements or techniques.<br />

Suggests a focus on how location can have Many different effects and suggests organization<br />

with an introductory statement and a discussion of Passage I in the first paragraph and of<br />

Passage II in the second paragraph. There is no conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (Every time a Summer holiday Came around The family went some<br />

were for vaction), with little awareness of audience and purpose. The response exhibits some<br />

attempt to vary sentence structure and length for effect, but with uneven success (Location can<br />

have Many different effects, it all depends on where you are at).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (some were, vaction,<br />

visitied), punctuation (effects, it; college it; home things), random capitalization, and grammar<br />

(In the second passage was speaking and many things … is seen) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in language use and conventions.<br />

[32]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – B<br />

[33]


Anchor Level 2 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused and incomplete understanding of the texts (When you grow up in a certain<br />

area, and you have all your memories … you feel comfortable). The response makes a few<br />

connections but fails to establish a controlling idea (In these two passages they discuss how<br />

hard it is to leave home).<br />

Development Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the text are vague (a<br />

child wants to leave home) and unjustified (when you return to your home town and see that its<br />

been destroyed and know your only a visitor in this town).<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Suggests a focus (when you are away from home for awhile … you miss it) and suggests<br />

organization, with an introduction and body paragraph. There is no conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is sometimes imprecise (their for “there,” your for “you’re,”<br />

know for “now”), with little awareness of audience and purpose (when you get back its just like<br />

it used to be). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and length for<br />

effect, but with uneven success (But when you are away from home … you think to yourself …<br />

your only a visitor in this town).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in punctuation (two passages they; its<br />

been; for awhile you; twice, when; changes, its never) and pronoun point of view (When you<br />

grow up and I ate a meal) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in language use.<br />

[34]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 2 – C<br />

Anchor Level 2 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

[35]<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Conveys a confused and incomplete understanding of the texts (they learned and experienced<br />

new things outside what you would of called there world which wasn’t much). The response<br />

makes a few connections to Passage I but fails to establish a controlling idea, only noting that<br />

the passages were very simular.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped, hinting at ideas, but references to the text are vague<br />

(When he came back home … everything was back to normal where he wasn’t all grown up and<br />

he was in the same type of situation where he learned knew things).<br />

Lacks an appropriate focus but suggests some organization (Both passages, The first passage is<br />

about, The other story).<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (A guy … learning and feeling the<br />

experiences of the city life is like). The response reveals little awareness of how to use sentences<br />

to achieve an effect (Where he wasn’t the adult).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in punctuation (college learning,<br />

home though where, farming everything), grammar (guy … learn and would of called), and a<br />

lack of paragraphing that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 1 – A<br />

Anchor Level 1 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides no evidence of textual understanding, only making reference to the task through the<br />

use of the word location.<br />

Is minimal, with no evidence of development beyond the general statements about the<br />

importance of location (location of where you are determines every thing about you).<br />

Lacks an appropriate focus but suggests some organization, with an introductory paragraph and<br />

a paragraph focusing on the influnce of where you live. There is no conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is at times repetitive (you), with little awareness of audience and<br />

purpose. The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and length for effect,<br />

but with uneven success (Where you live … what to where).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (every thing, influnce,<br />

snowbord, sruff), punctuation (about you where, you get you, live you might), and capitalization<br />

(location of, it also, depending on) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Although the response best fits the criteria for Levels 1, 2, and 3, it remains at<br />

Level 1 because the response makes no reference to either text.<br />

[36]


Anchor Paper – Part A—Level 1 – B<br />

Anchor Level 1 – B 30162<br />

Quality<br />

Commentary<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

The response:<br />

Provides no evidence of textual understanding. The response makes no connections between the<br />

texts or among ideas in the texts.<br />

Is minimal, with no evidence of development.<br />

Suggests a focus (Being in a certain area … can have huge effect on your life), but lacks<br />

organization.<br />

Is minimal.<br />

Is minimal, making assessment of conventions unreliable.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 1, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in organization.<br />

[37]


Part A — Practice Paper – A<br />

[38]


Part A — Practice Paper – B<br />

[39]


Part A — Practice Paper – B<br />

[40]


Part A — Practice Paper – B<br />

[41]


Part A — Practice Paper – C<br />

[42]


Part A — Practice Paper – D<br />

[43]


Part A — Practice Paper – D<br />

[44]


Part A — Practice Paper – E<br />

[45]


Part A — Practice Paper – E<br />

[46]


Practice Paper A – Score Level 2<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

Practice Paper B – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper C – Score Level 3<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in conventions.<br />

Practice Paper D – Score Level 5<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in organization.<br />

Practice Paper E – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

[47]


<strong>SESSION</strong> TWO – PART B – SCORING RUBRIC<br />

READING AND WRITING FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS<br />

QUALITY<br />

Meaning: the extent to<br />

which the response<br />

exhibits sound<br />

understanding,<br />

interpretation, and<br />

analysis of the task<br />

and text(s)<br />

6<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide an interpretation<br />

of the "critical lens" that<br />

is faithful to the<br />

complexity of the<br />

statement and clearly<br />

establishes the criteria<br />

for analysis<br />

-use the criteria to make<br />

insightful analysis of the<br />

chosen texts<br />

5<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide a thoughtful<br />

interpretation of the<br />

"critical lens" that clearly<br />

establishes the criteria<br />

for analysis<br />

-use the criteria to make<br />

a clear and reasoned<br />

analysis of the chosen<br />

texts<br />

4<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide a reasonable<br />

interpretation of the<br />

"critical lens" that<br />

establishes the criteria<br />

for analysis<br />

-make implicit<br />

connections between<br />

criteria and the chosen<br />

texts<br />

3<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide a simple<br />

interpretation of the<br />

"critical lens" that<br />

suggests some criteria<br />

for analysis<br />

-make superficial<br />

connections between the<br />

criteria and the chosen<br />

texts<br />

2<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-provide a confused or<br />

incomplete interpretation<br />

of the "critical lens"<br />

-may allude to the<br />

"critical lens" but do not<br />

use it to analyze the<br />

chosen texts<br />

Development: the<br />

extent to which ideas<br />

are elaborated using<br />

specific and relevant<br />

evidence from the<br />

text(s)<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and fully, making<br />

effective use of a wide<br />

range of relevant and<br />

specific evidence and<br />

appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop ideas clearly<br />

and consistently, with<br />

reference to relevant and<br />

specific evidence and<br />

appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop some ideas<br />

more fully than others,<br />

with reference to specific<br />

and relevant evidence<br />

and appropriate literary<br />

elements from both texts<br />

-develop ideas briefly,<br />

using some evidence<br />

from the text<br />

-may rely primarily on<br />

plot summary<br />

-are incomplete or<br />

largely undeveloped,<br />

hinting at ideas, but<br />

references to the text are<br />

vague, irrelevant,<br />

repetitive, or unjustified<br />

Organization: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

direction, shape, and<br />

coherence<br />

-maintain the focus<br />

established by the critical<br />

lens<br />

-exhibit a logical and<br />

coherent structure<br />

through skillful use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain the focus<br />

established by the critical<br />

lens<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas<br />

through use of<br />

appropriate devices and<br />

transitions<br />

-maintain a clear and<br />

appropriate focus<br />

-exhibit a logical<br />

sequence of ideas but<br />

may lack internal<br />

consistency<br />

-establish, but fail to<br />

maintain, an appropriate<br />

focus<br />

- exhibit a rudimentary<br />

structure but may<br />

include some<br />

inconsistencies or<br />

irrelevancies<br />

-lack an appropriate<br />

focus but suggest some<br />

organization, or suggest<br />

a focus but lack<br />

organization<br />

Language Use: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response reveals an<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose through<br />

effective use of words,<br />

sentence structure,<br />

and sentence variety<br />

-are stylistically<br />

sophisticated, using<br />

language that is precise<br />

and engaging, with a<br />

notable sense of voice<br />

and awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

enhance meaning<br />

-use language that is<br />

fluent and original, with<br />

evident awareness of<br />

audience and purpose<br />

-vary structure and<br />

length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and<br />

pacing<br />

-use appropriate<br />

language, with some<br />

awareness of audience<br />

and purpose<br />

-occasionally make<br />

effective use of sentence<br />

structure or length<br />

-rely on basic<br />

vocabulary, with little<br />

awareness of audience<br />

or purpose<br />

-exhibit some attempt to<br />

vary sentence structure<br />

or length for effect, but<br />

with uneven success<br />

-use language that is<br />

imprecise or unsuitable<br />

for the audience or<br />

purpose<br />

-reveal little awareness<br />

of how to use sentences<br />

to achieve an effect<br />

Conventions: the<br />

extent to which the<br />

response exhibits<br />

conventional spelling,<br />

punctuation,<br />

paragraphing,<br />

capitalization,<br />

grammar, and usage<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions with<br />

essentially no errors,<br />

even with sophisticated<br />

language<br />

-demonstrate control of<br />

the conventions,<br />

exhibiting occasional<br />

errors only when using<br />

sophisticated language<br />

-demonstrate partial<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that do<br />

not hinder<br />

comprehension<br />

-demonstrate emerging<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

occasional errors that<br />

hinder comprehension<br />

-demonstrate a lack of<br />

control, exhibiting<br />

frequent errors that make<br />

comprehension difficult<br />

• If the student addresses only one text, the response can be scored no higher than a 3.<br />

• If the student writes only a personal response and makes no reference to the text(s), the response can be scored no higher than a 1.<br />

• Responses totally unrelated to the topic, illegible, incoherent, or blank should be given a 0.<br />

• A response totally copied from the text(s) with no original student writing should be scored a 0.<br />

1<br />

Responses at this<br />

level:<br />

-do not refer to the<br />

"critical lens"<br />

-reflect minimal or no<br />

analysis of the chosen<br />

texts<br />

-are minimal, with no<br />

evidence of development<br />

-show no focus or<br />

organization<br />

-are minimal<br />

-use language that is<br />

incoherent or<br />

inappropriate<br />

-are minimal, making<br />

assessment of<br />

conventions unreliable<br />

-may be illegible or not<br />

recognizable as English<br />

[48]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – A<br />

[49]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – A<br />

[50]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – A<br />

Anchor Level 6 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides an interpretation of the critical lens that is faithful to the complexity of the statement<br />

and clearly establishes the criteria for analysis (true heroes are not those who intend to be<br />

heroes). The response uses the criteria to make an insightful analysis of The Scarlet Letter and<br />

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (Hester Prynne and Harry Potter are both characters<br />

never intended to become heroes, but who have heroism thrust upon them by unexpected<br />

circumstances).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and fully, making effective use of a wide range of relevant and specific<br />

evidence from the texts. The response relates Hester’s unexpected pregnancy to the Puritan<br />

values of its time to explain her situation and then positively characterizes her as determined to<br />

be a good mother to Pearl and live her life with pride and strength. The response explains that<br />

Harry Potter’s fate to be the only one able to destroy Lord Voldemort makes him frustrated that<br />

he cannot be like the other students, then discusses Harry’s epic journey, and positively<br />

characterizes him for his ability to muster bravery despite his desire to lead a normal life.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the critical lens on characters who would have preferred to<br />

lead quieter lives but who conjure the strength and courage they need. The response exhibits a<br />

logical and coherent structure, introducing the controlling idea of accidental or reluctant heroes<br />

presenting information about each character’s situation and heroic coping techniques (a<br />

passionate woman … whose determination to survive and Harry must conquer many fears and<br />

muster courage), and ending with a conclusion that reiterates the controlling idea. The response<br />

makes skillful use of transitions (Despite, In a setting drastically different, Oftentimes).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original, although occasionally imprecise (diversity for<br />

“adversity”), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (Both Hester Prynne and Harry<br />

Potter had no intentions of becoming heroes). The response varies structure and length of<br />

sentences to control rhythm and pacing (The locket is a symbol of Voldemort’s precarious<br />

immortality; it must be destroyed for Voldemort to be destroyed).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use.<br />

[51]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[52]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[53]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 6 – B<br />

[54]


Anchor Level 6 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides an interpretation of the critical lens that is faithful to the complexity of the statement<br />

and clearly establishes the criteria for analysis of Kaffir Boy and A Raisin in the Sun (a hero is a<br />

person who helps someone in the midst of a problem). The response uses the criteria to make<br />

insightful analysis of the chosen texts (Even in the face of adversity, Mathabane’s mother<br />

selflessly showed courage and loyalty to her children and Walter Younger puts his love for his<br />

family above all else).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence of<br />

each text’s setting (during the period of apartheid, she was married to a man … who abused<br />

her constantly, Chicago in the 1950s, a society laden with prejudice and discrimination) to<br />

discuss how the courage of Mathabane’s mother and the unselfishness of Walter Younger made<br />

them heroic characters (when their families were faced with adversity, they both showed a<br />

selfless valor that truly made them heroes).<br />

Maintains the focus established by the critical lens (Both authors use the theme of family love to<br />

show what it means to be a true hero). The response exhibits a logical and coherent structure,<br />

moving from the mother’s self-sacrifice to better her children in Kaffir Boy, to the son’s<br />

sacrifice of future plans for his family in a Raisin in the Sun, ending with a conclusion that<br />

synthesizes the argument. Appropriate transitions are skillfully used (despite the hardship, Even<br />

in the face, Shortly before).<br />

Is stylistically sophisticated, using language that is precise and engaging (A hero is altruistic<br />

and benevolent, someone who does not look for any gain when helping others), with a notable<br />

sense of voice and awareness of audience and purpose (This is absolutely true; a hero … never<br />

stopping to consider what they have to gain from their deeds). The response varies structure and<br />

length of sentences to enhance meaning (Walter’s true heroic character shines through when he<br />

ultimately decides to delay his own dreams in order to fulfill his family’s).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions with essentially no errors, even with sophisticated<br />

language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 6, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

[55]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – A<br />

[56]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – A<br />

Anchor Level 5 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a thoughtful interpretation of the critical lens that clearly establishes the criteria for<br />

analysis (a real hero is someone who acts without thinking about what the heroic thing to do<br />

is). The response uses the criteria to make a clear and reasoned analysis of To Kill a<br />

Mockingbird (Atticus did not care about the other people because he knew that Tom was<br />

innocent) and Lord of the Flies (Ralph … heroically looks out for one of the boys who always<br />

got picked on).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence from<br />

both texts to show how a true hero acts without thinking about how others see him. The<br />

response integrates references to the controlling idea with setting and characterization (his small<br />

town of Maycomb; during a time period when people were not treated equally; young boys, are<br />

stranded on an island during war time … Ralph is chosen to be the leader.).<br />

Maintains the focus established by the critical lens (Without premeditation, the hero does the<br />

right thing and so, stands out to the rest of us). The response exhibits a logical sequence of<br />

ideas, beginning with an interpretation of the “real hero” who will think about what is right,<br />

moving into the characterization of Atticus, a kind and well-respected lawyer who avoids<br />

confrontations when possible. The response then characterizes Ralph, the “fair boy”, as<br />

someone who tried to preserve civilization with rules. Appropriate transitions are used (IN<br />

other words; Also, he had; However, Ralph).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original (Atticus … adamantly did not like guns and white<br />

people in town chided him), with evident awareness of audience and purpose (William Golding<br />

also shows the truth of this quotation). The response varies structure and length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and pacing (Tom was a kind and gentle man and He, and many other young<br />

boys … without any adults).<br />

Conventions Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in pronoun agreement (a<br />

real hero … they think) and verb tense (Ralph is chosen … Ralph tried).<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5 in all qualities.<br />

[57]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – B<br />

[58]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – B<br />

[59]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – B<br />

Anchor Level 5 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a thoughtful interpretation of the critical lens that clearly establishes the criteria for<br />

analysis (someone who isn’t really supposed to be a hero always turns out to be one). The<br />

response uses the criteria to make a clear and reasoned analysis of Siddhartha (Siddhartha is<br />

searching for the meaning of his life) and Henry IV (Prince Hal had no intentions of becoming a<br />

hero; he simply wanted to be loved by his father).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others, with reference to specific and relevant evidence<br />

alluding to characterization in both works (By letting his son go and being at peace with it,<br />

Siddhartha became a real hero and Hal starts to take control of situations rather than running<br />

away) and conflict in Henry IV (hand-to-hand combat with Hotspur, who was portrayed as a<br />

better warrior). Siddhartha’s many previous stages of life, when he was seen as a hero to everyone<br />

around him, are less developed.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the critical lens that both characters had no longing to become<br />

heroes, but at the end of their journey, that was exactly what they had become. The response<br />

exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, moving from an interpretation of the critical lens, to an<br />

analysis of each work, concluding that The quote … by Umberto Eco, exemplifies the ideas of the<br />

character Siddhartha … and Prince Hal. Appropriate transitions are used (The main, A second,<br />

One example).<br />

Uses language that is fluent and original, with evident awareness of audience and purpose (Prince<br />

Hal took the iniative, and he organized a plan to stop the opposition). The response varies<br />

structure and length of sentences to control rhythm and pacing (King Henry sees the honor in<br />

Hal’s actions and gives him praise for his bravery).<br />

Demonstrates control of the conventions, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (devizes and<br />

iniative) only when using sophisticated language.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

[60]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

[61]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

[62]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 5 – C<br />

Anchor Level 5 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a thoughtful interpretation of the critical lens that clearly establishes the criteria for<br />

analysis (the true hero does not intend to be a hero at first). The response uses the criteria to<br />

make a clear and reasoned analysis of The Grapes of Wrath (Tom becomes the real hero at the<br />

end) and The Crucible (John Proctor … becomes a moral, honest man who stands up).<br />

Develops ideas clearly and consistently, with reference to relevant and specific evidence from<br />

both texts. The response uses specific details regarding setting (on the road from Oklahoma to<br />

California during the Great Depression and in Salem during the witch hunt) and<br />

characterization (he learns to be responsible and caring, stands up for a migrant worker, he<br />

will follow Jim’s path, Proctor does nothing, he learns, He risks his reputation, sacrifices his<br />

life to ensure) in discussing unintentional heroism in both works.<br />

Maintains the focus established by the critical lens on the idea that characters come accross<br />

instances where they cannot prevent themselves from helping others and therefore becoming<br />

true heros. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first presenting information to<br />

describe Tom Joad’s character change (Tom Joad begins as a selfish young man and ends up as<br />

a hero who sacrifices his life for the good of others), then John Proctor’s character change<br />

(John Proctor starts out as a liar and adulterer, but becomes a hero … to admit the truth and<br />

defend Elizabeth and other innocent people), and concluding with an assessment of heros.<br />

Transitions are appropriate (Both writers, Therefore, In the beginning).<br />

Uses language that is fluent an original, with evident awareness of audience and purpose (In<br />

this act of selflessness, which directly contrasts from his former selfishness and preoccupation,<br />

Tom Joad becomes a true hero), but is occasionally inexact (Tom defends Jim Casy as a police<br />

officer shoots him by killing the cop). The response varies structure and length of sentences to<br />

control rhythm and pacing (In essence, heros would not be real heros if they set out to<br />

intentionally do an honorable, moral act).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (unitentionally, heros,<br />

accross) and punctuation (caught since and cave and when ) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[63]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – A<br />

[64]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – A<br />

[65]


Anchor Level 4 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a thoughtful interpretation of the critical lens that clearly establishes the criteria for<br />

analysis, stating a hero is never put in his heroic situation purposely, it is always by chance that<br />

a hero is put to his test. The response makes a clear and reasoned analysis of The Crucible<br />

(Proctor does not voluntarily put himself in a situation to cause himself to be seen as a hero,<br />

but it are the actions he takes in this situation which make him a hero) and Lord of the Flies<br />

(Ralph … crashes on the remote island by chance, and is not voluntarily put in a fight for his<br />

life).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response identifies John Proctor as a middle<br />

aged man of Puritan Salem Massachusetts who becomes one of the few in Salem who do not<br />

admit to the practice to salvage their own life. The discussion of Lord of the Flies is less fully<br />

developed, identifying the conflict between Ralph, as protagonist, and Jack, as antagonist (when<br />

many of the boys side with the antagonist, Jack, Ralph becomes a hero as he stands up to the<br />

thurst for power and savagry).<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea that heroes are established by mistake. The<br />

response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first interpreting the lens, then providing<br />

information about John Proctor’s difficult situation in The Crucible, followed by Ralph’s<br />

opportunity for heroism in Lord of the Flies. The response concludes by reiterating the idea that<br />

John Proctor and Ralph become heroes by the actions they take during their difficult task that<br />

occurred by chance. The response lacks internal consistency through the presence of a<br />

repetitive conclusion.<br />

Uses appropriate language (heroic situation, supposed witchcraft, praiseworthy), with some<br />

awareness of audience and purpose (Another work that supports Umberto Eco’s statement is<br />

Lord of the Flies, by William Golding). The response occasionally makes effective use of<br />

sentence structure (This classic novel’s protagonist, Ralph, also comes to heroism by chance).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (thurst and savagry),<br />

punctuation (purposely, it; chance but; Salem Massachusetts), and grammar (it are, actions …<br />

makes, hero … themselves) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in meaning.<br />

[66]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – B<br />

[67]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – B<br />

[68]


Anchor Level 4 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a reasonable interpretation of the critical lens by stating that a hero becomes a hero<br />

not intentionally, disagreeing with the lens, and suggesting that a hero earns their title and is<br />

not called a hero by mistake. The response makes implicit connections between the criteria and<br />

Beowulf (Beowulf intentionally batteled with Grendel to save the town and the people in it) and<br />

The Color Purple (She became a hero to herself not by mistake but to save her life).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response uses specific and relevant evidence<br />

from Beowulf by briefly identifying the conflict (the protagonist character, Beowulf defeats<br />

Grendel, the antagonist character and Grendel was causing chaos in the town and was killing<br />

innocent people who lived in the town). The discussion of The Color Purple is more fully<br />

developed through the author’s characterization of Celie (the main character, Celie was faced<br />

with abuse, rape, and mistreatment) and use of plot (As the book progressed Celie began to<br />

learn how to stand up to herself). The discussion of Beowulf is less developed.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea that heros are not heros by mistake. The<br />

response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first interpreting the lens, then disagreeing and<br />

offering an alternative definition of heroes. Ideas are supported through a presentation of the<br />

heroic actions taken in Beowulf, followed by The Color Purple. Internal consistency is<br />

weakened through a lack of external transitions.<br />

Uses appropriate language, that is sometimes inexact (not become hero and a lot), with some<br />

awareness of audience and purpose (Conflict is the problem that occurs between characters<br />

throught the novel). The response occasionally makes effective use of sentence structure (She<br />

eventually left her husband, moved, and opened her own business).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (heros, throught, batteled),<br />

punctuation (untrue, a hero; Beowulf defeats; Celie was), grammar (hero … their, stand up to<br />

herself, a hero to herself), and tense shifts (present and past) in paragraphs 2 and 3 that do not<br />

hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4 in all qualities.<br />

[69]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – C<br />

[70]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 4 – C<br />

Anchor Level 4 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a reasonable interpretation of the critical lens, suggesting that a hero is your average<br />

Joe who is in the right place at the right time. The response makes implicit connections<br />

between the criteria and The Crucible (That makes him a hero in a way) and The Adventures of<br />

Huckleberry Finn (Huck starts to realize the dangers of slavery).<br />

Develops some ideas more fully than others. The response makes reference to specific and<br />

relevant evidence about setting for both works (takes place during the Salem witch-hunts in<br />

Salem, Massachusets during the late 1600’s and takes place during pre-Civil War times along<br />

the Mississippi River). The response alludes to characterization in both works (tried to do<br />

something noone else would try and Huck … does anything to keep Jim safe), but the discussion<br />

is less developed.<br />

Maintains a clear and appropriate focus on the idea that heroes are characters doing something<br />

they were not expected to do. The response exhibits a logical sequence of ideas, first<br />

interpreting the lens, then presenting information about each character’s circumstances, and<br />

concluding with an assessment of heroism in literature and life. The response is weakened by a<br />

lack of external transitions.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (This quote is true and is shown in many books). The response<br />

exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and length, but with uneven success (The book<br />

is about a boy, named Huck Finn, and his slave friend, Jim, and their journey North for<br />

freedom).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (Massachusets and lieing),<br />

punctuation (Superman, its; For example a; heroic. He), and grammar (person that and child …<br />

their) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in language use.<br />

[71]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – A<br />

[72]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – A<br />

Anchor Level 3 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens, stating that a person/character may do<br />

certain things and never think about what will become of the event afterwards. The response<br />

makes superficial connections between the criteria and The Old Man and the Sea (Santiago had<br />

become a hero to Manolin without even trying) and Jane Eyre (Bertha was a hero because she<br />

saved Rochester from having to stay with her).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some evidence from the texts (out at sea for a few days, going<br />

through and enduring much hardship and pain and Without knowing, and even though she died<br />

… she helped Jane). The response relies on plot summary.<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus on people who will end up being the hero<br />

when they don’t even mean to be. The response exhibits a rudimentary structure of introduction<br />

and a body paragraph for each text. There is no conclusion. References to Bertha as crazy and<br />

use of her setting the house on fire so that Jane would be able to marry the man she [Jane] loved<br />

as an example of heroism are inconsistent with the definition of a hero.<br />

Uses appropriate language, with some awareness of audience and purpose (There are many<br />

obstacles that he needed to overcome and Another novel that exemplifies Umberto Eco’s quote).<br />

The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure (Jane then returned to Rochester<br />

and ended up marrying him).<br />

Demonstrates partial control, exhibiting occasional errors in comma usage (character Santiago<br />

is; Eventually when Santiago; And, Manolin; Further into the novel Jane) and grammar (he or<br />

she … them and good friends of Santiago) that do not hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in language use and conventions.<br />

[73]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – B<br />

[74]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – B<br />

[75]


Anchor Level 3 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens (a person that saves the day never really<br />

means to do it they just do). The response makes superficial connections between the criteria<br />

and To Kill a Mockingbird (Atticus … was the hero by mistake) and Of Mice and Men (George<br />

… would have to be the hero by mistake).<br />

Develops ideas briefly, using some evidence from the text (Atticus was assigned … Mayella<br />

Ewell and when Lenny killed the dog … people were after him). The response refers to setting<br />

and uses the term “protagonist,” but relies primarily on plot summary.<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus. The interpretation of the critical lens is<br />

not supported by the second paragraph (Atticus … believed that he could still get Tom out and<br />

he did it for Lenny so that he wouldn’t be killed). The response returns more clearly to the focus<br />

in the conclusion (heros are never trying to be a hero it just happens that way). The response<br />

exhibits a rudimentary structure, but it includes irrelevancies (many people showed their<br />

appreciation to Atticus by bringing … food) and an inaccurate reference to Atticus and the Civil<br />

Rights Movement.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is often imprecise (This was the case … Atticus said he had to<br />

do, he started a beginning, that ranch thing). The response exhibits some attempt to vary<br />

sentence structure, but with uneven success (the protagonist scout … in this novel).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (negroe, exexidently,<br />

heros), punctuation (by Harper Lee and and in the end Atticus), capitalization (this means,<br />

scout, Guilty), and grammar (a person that saves the day … they, the jury founded, By George<br />

killing Lenny) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

[76]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 3 – C<br />

[77]


Anchor Level 3 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens that suggests some criteria for analysis<br />

(when a person does not want to or dosen’t think they can they are). The response makes<br />

superficial connections to Romeo and Juliet (they were heroes by the chance of what they did)<br />

and any one of the Sherlock Holmes stories.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped. The response makes vague references to Romeo and<br />

Juliet (they carried on following their dreams and by the actions they took to overcome the<br />

troubles they had) and very general references to Sherlock Holmes (He likes helping people).<br />

Establishes, but fails to maintain, an appropriate focus. The response exhibits a rudimentary<br />

structure but shifts from the focus in the third paragraph and in the conclusion.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary that is sometimes imprecise (in their own way and could be one by<br />

want). The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure and length for effect, but<br />

with uneven success (I agree with this statement because … they are and Romeo and Juliet …<br />

sense).<br />

Demonstrates emerging control, exhibiting occasional errors in spelling (dosen’t, declaired,<br />

desirs), punctuation (heroes but, want its, chance not), and grammar (a person … they, could be<br />

considered heroes … as can, I believes) that hinder comprehension.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

[78]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – A<br />

Anchor Level 2 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens (hero’s in the stories didn’t know that they<br />

were hero’s and their actions in a speciffic situation made them hero’s), but does not use it to<br />

analyze The Great Santini. Lord of the Rings is mentioned, but not analyzed.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped. The response hints at ideas about Santini (a man who is<br />

a pilot who fly’s an F-4 phantom fighter jet for the US military), but references are vague<br />

(Inspite of him being a defender of freedom he does have some family problems and is an<br />

alcholic). The response offers no discussion of Lord of the Rings.<br />

Suggests a focus on the critical lens in the opening paragraph but lacks organization, presenting<br />

a two-sentence description of Santini in the second paragraph.<br />

Relies on basic vocabulary (The Great Santiny is about a man), with little awareness of<br />

audience and purpose. The response exhibits some attempt to vary sentence structure or length<br />

for effect, but with uneven success (Inspite of him being … he does).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (peaces, Santiny, hero’s,<br />

speciffic), punctuation (statement “The … mistake” can; hero’s, their; freedom he), random<br />

capitalization, and grammar (Two peaces of literature … is and him being) that make<br />

comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in meaning and language use.<br />

[79]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – B<br />

[80]


Anchor Level 2 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens, stating that people just don’t wake up one<br />

day and decide that there next job is going to be a hero, but rather heroes are made during a<br />

time of crises. The response makes superficial connections to Fallen Angels (a man named<br />

caree only helped people because he got scared) and The Things They Carried (a soldier who<br />

always runs aways from fights actaly helped someone).<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped. The response hints at the actions of characters in Fallen<br />

Angels and The Things They Carried, but references to the texts are vague. The response relies<br />

heavily on a discussion of why people act heroically.<br />

Suggests a focus on the critical lens but lacks organization. The response consists of one<br />

paragraph that begins with a restatement of the lens, followed by a reference to Fallen Angels,<br />

then a discussion of fear and bravery, followed by an interpretation of the lens, and ending with<br />

a reference to The Things They Carried.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (his bravery made him help<br />

people, there for “their,” It is when during, the for “he”). The response reveals little awareness<br />

of how to use sentences to achieve an effect (Fear of someone going to hurt a loved one, or a<br />

person going to hurt you).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (Some times, couarge,<br />

over powers, actaly, turend), punctuation (book Fallen angels a, scared and, book the things<br />

they carried a), capitalization (angels, caree, the things they carried), and grammar (couarge …<br />

make) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2, although it is somewhat<br />

stronger in meaning.<br />

[81]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – C<br />

[82]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 2 – C<br />

Anchor Level 2 – C<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides an incomplete interpretation of the critical lens. The response alludes to the critical<br />

lens but does not use it to analyze “The Bet” or The Great Gatsby.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped. The response provides a synopsis of “The Bet” that is<br />

irrelevant to the criteria established by the lens. The discussion of The Great Gatsby is vague<br />

(Gasbty thew alot of party looking for this cold love) and unjustified (Tom was rich that why<br />

she left Gastby for Tom).<br />

Lacks an appropriate focus but suggests some organization, beginning, in paragraph 1, with a<br />

restatement of and agreement with the lens and followed by some loosely related statements<br />

from “The Bet.” The response contains two additional paragraphs of loosely related ideas about<br />

The Great Gatsby, but lacks a conclusion.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise for the audience and purpose (two works of literary, layer for<br />

“lawyer,” for like 10 years, living for “leaving”). The response reveals little awareness of how<br />

to use sentences to achieve an effect (The Great Gasbty it go with).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in spelling (Gastby and thew),<br />

punctuation (Eco statement, The Great Gastby, that why), and grammar (Bet’ go, lock up, He<br />

end) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

[83]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 1 – A<br />

[84]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 1 – A<br />

Anchor Level 1 – A<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a simple interpretation of the critical lens, stating a hero is a hero by mistake because<br />

he dont even know when is going to happens, and he is ready to save a person’s life at random.<br />

The response does not use the critical lens to analyze any texts.<br />

Is incomplete and largely undeveloped. The response refers to little things like an old lady<br />

crossing and you offer to help her as being a hero by mistake. The response is repetitive in its<br />

suggestion that it is the person’s heart that makes him/her heroic. There is no mention of any<br />

texts.<br />

Suggests a focus on the critical lens by restating it, agreeing with it, and making personal<br />

statements about it. The response lacks organization.<br />

Uses language that is imprecise and unsuitable for the audience and purpose (I see it happen all<br />

the time, well of course the person and And then they end up being a hero by random by<br />

mistake). The response reveals little awareness of how to use sentences to achieve an effect<br />

(And most of the time when things happens its at random … so a hero is always ready and<br />

willing).<br />

Demonstrates a lack of control, exhibiting frequent errors in apostrophes (people lives, its at<br />

random, thats, dont), use of commas (statement, is; time, well; random, even; her thats), and<br />

grammar (person … are heroes, things happens, he dont) that make comprehension difficult.<br />

Conclusion: Although the response fits the criteria for Levels 2 and 3, it remains at Level 1<br />

because the response makes no reference to any texts.<br />

[85]


Anchor Paper – Part B—Level 1 – B<br />

Anchor Level 1 – B<br />

Quality<br />

Meaning<br />

Development<br />

Organization<br />

Language Use<br />

Conventions<br />

Commentary<br />

The response:<br />

Provides a confused interpretation of the critical lens (most people that are heroes don’t plan<br />

out to be heroes and help people for the sake of lending an extra hand when its needed). The<br />

response does not use the critical lens to analyze any texts.<br />

Is minimal, with no evidence of development.<br />

Suggests a focus on the critical lens, but is too brief to demonstrate organization.<br />

Is minimal.<br />

Is minimal, making assessment of conventions unreliable.<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response fits the criteria for Level 1, although it is somewhat stronger in<br />

meaning and organization.<br />

[86]


Part B — Practice Paper – A<br />

[87]


Part B — Practice Paper – A<br />

[88]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[89]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[90]


Part B — Practice Paper – B<br />

[91]


Part B — Practice Paper – C<br />

[92]


Part B — Practice Paper – D<br />

[93]


Part B — Practice Paper – D<br />

[94]


Part B — Practice Paper – E<br />

[95]


Part B — Practice Paper – E<br />

[96]


Practice Paper A – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

Practice Paper B – Score Level 5<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 5, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in conventions.<br />

Practice Paper C – Score Level 2<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 2 in all qualities.<br />

Practice Paper D – Score Level 4<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 4, although it is somewhat weaker<br />

in development.<br />

Practice Paper E – Score Level 3<br />

Conclusion: Overall, the response best fits the criteria for Level 3 in all qualities.<br />

Regents Comprehensive Examination in English<br />

Map to Learning Standards<br />

Standards Key Ideas<br />

Listening and writing for<br />

information and understanding<br />

Reading and writing for<br />

information and understanding<br />

Reading and writing for literary<br />

response<br />

Reading and writing for critical<br />

analysis and evaluation<br />

Part of Test<br />

Session One – Part A<br />

Session One – Part B<br />

Session Two – Part A<br />

Session Two – Part B<br />

[97]


Total<br />

Essay<br />

Score<br />

Regents Comprehensive Examination in English—August 2008<br />

Chart for Determining the Final Examination Score (Use for August 2008 examination only.)<br />

To determine the student’s final examination score, locate the student’s total essay score across the top of the chart and the student’s total multiplechoice<br />

score down the side of the chart. The point where those two scores intersect is the student’s final examination score. For example, a student<br />

receiving a total essay score of 16 and a total multiple-choice score of 19 would receive a final examination score of 70.<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24<br />

0 0 1 1 2 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65<br />

1 1 1 2 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67<br />

2 1 1 2 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69<br />

3 1 2 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70<br />

4 1 2 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72<br />

5 2 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74<br />

6 2 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76<br />

7 2 3 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77<br />

8 2 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79<br />

9 3 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80<br />

10 3 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82<br />

11 4 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84<br />

12 5 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85<br />

13 6 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86<br />

14 7 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88<br />

15 8 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89<br />

16 9 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90<br />

17 10 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89 92<br />

Total Multiple-Choice Score<br />

18 11 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90 93<br />

19 12 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89 92 94<br />

20 14 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90 93 95<br />

21 15 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89 92 94 96<br />

22 17 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90 93 95 97<br />

23 18 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89 92 94 96 98<br />

24 20 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90 93 95 97 99<br />

25 21 24 28 32 36 39 43 47 51 55 59 63 67 70 74 77 80 84 86 89 92 94 96 98 99<br />

26 23 26 30 34 38 41 45 49 53 57 61 65 69 72 76 79 82 85 88 90 93 95 97 99 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!