19.03.2014 Views

The Record 2006 - Keble College - University of Oxford

The Record 2006 - Keble College - University of Oxford

The Record 2006 - Keble College - University of Oxford

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> the <strong>College</strong><br />

to say that the risks <strong>of</strong> contracting radiation-induced cancer are not<br />

known. [<strong>The</strong>re always remains a statistical error, in this case at the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> parts per thousand.]<br />

In every situation there are special risks which require special<br />

safety measures. In the case <strong>of</strong> nuclear accidents such a risk is the<br />

inhalation <strong>of</strong> radioactive iodine which is rapidly absorbed by the<br />

thyroid, especially in young children. This then causes cancer over<br />

the following decades. <strong>The</strong> special measure requires the population<br />

to take iodine tablets during the three weeks following an accidental<br />

release. This dilutes the radioactive iodine to the point where its uptake<br />

by the thyroid is negligible. This has been known for decades but was<br />

ignored in the aftermath <strong>of</strong> Chernobyl. So far some 1100 children have<br />

contracted cancer, <strong>of</strong> whom 3 have died (1998). <strong>The</strong> incidence peaked<br />

in 1995 and is falling <strong>of</strong>f. This was an entirely avoidable addition to the<br />

accident.<br />

A fresh estimate <strong>of</strong> safe levels <strong>of</strong> ionising radiation in an era <strong>of</strong> global<br />

warming<br />

<strong>The</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> nuclear power are predicated on safety levels. <strong>The</strong><br />

numbers above suggest that regulation levels for nuclear safety should<br />

be relaxed by a factor 300 from 1mSv/yr to 25mSv/month for the<br />

general public. Such a safety limit would still have a very conservative<br />

ratio relative to a lethal dose (6000 mSv/25mSv = 240), compared for<br />

example with tissue heating by ultrasound, (50ºC/1ºC = 50). Relative<br />

to marginal damage levels the ratios would be 100mSv/25mSv = 4<br />

and 2ºC/1ºC = 2, respectively. This change would significantly reduce<br />

the supposed costs <strong>of</strong> nuclear power including decommissioning. A<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> nuclear and renewable power in the next 50 years<br />

would give time for the development <strong>of</strong> clean thermonuclear fusion<br />

power whose feasibility can no longer be doubted.<br />

This discussion has skipped many details and is debatable at the<br />

level <strong>of</strong> factors <strong>of</strong> two. However the factors <strong>of</strong> ten are defensible, and<br />

an adjustment by a factor 300 <strong>of</strong> nuclear safety levels should have<br />

significant and immediate consequences for energy policy.<br />

This article is based on a lecture given in <strong>College</strong> at the Reunion<br />

weekend for 1957–62s in April this year and is the subject <strong>of</strong><br />

a book Fundamental Physics for Probing and Imaging<br />

published in October. Available through bookshops, or direct from<br />

OUP at:<br />

http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199203888<br />

http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-920389-X<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!