surface & stormwater management performance audit final report
surface & stormwater management performance audit final report
surface & stormwater management performance audit final report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Surface & Storm Water Management Performance Audit<br />
Kitsap County, Washington<br />
Final Report<br />
• Catch Basin Cleaning - R.W. Beck recommended that the Program conduct annual<br />
cleaning of all catch basins. The Program has actually cleaned more than 100% of its<br />
catch basins in each of the last two years (cleaning has been required for certain catch<br />
basins more frequently than once a year). Program personnel <strong>report</strong> that the costs<br />
associated with satisfying this recommendation has been less than the amount assumed<br />
by R.W. Beck.<br />
• Pollution Prevention Plans - R.W. Beck recommended that the SSWM Program develop<br />
Pollution Prevention Plans for County-owned facilities. These plans have been<br />
completed.<br />
• Street Sweeping - R.W. Beck recommended monthly sweeping of all curbed streets. This<br />
activity is the responsibility of the County Roads Department. During winter months, the<br />
current goal is to pick up sand within two weeks of its application. During the summer<br />
months, streets are swept on an as-needed basis. It is not expected that the Phase II<br />
Permit will require a change in the County’s current street sweeping frequency.<br />
• Facilities, Parks and Recreation Department Impacts - The Phase II Permit would<br />
require that maintenance of <strong>stormwater</strong> facilities in County parks also be performed in<br />
accordance with the pollution prevention minimum control measure requirements. This<br />
would be the responsibility of the County Facilities, Parks, and Recreation Department.<br />
SSWM Program personnel <strong>report</strong> that they have completed some work on behalf of the<br />
Facilities, Parks, and Recreation Department and other County departments, and as a<br />
result a somewhat better working relationship has developed.<br />
Observation: There are a number of SSWM program elements that are not required by the<br />
NPDES permit, but Kitsap County has other state requirements and its own requirements that it<br />
fulfills through its SSWM program.<br />
To determine what SSWM program elements are required versus those that are discretionary, the<br />
program elements were compared to the NPDES requirements. As noted in Chapter II, the<br />
Board of Commissioners established the SSWM Program for a broad number of purposes that<br />
are not solely related to the NPDES permit requirements. As a result, there are a number of<br />
SWWM program elements and certain tasks of other program elements that are not required by<br />
the draft NPDES Phase II Permit requirements (i.e., these program elements go beyond the<br />
minimum requirements of the Phase II Permit). Exhibit 10 shows the SSWM program elements<br />
by department/agency and shows what program elements are required and discretionary. A more<br />
detailed analysis is in Appendix B.<br />
Page 27