21.03.2014 Views

surface & stormwater management performance audit final report

surface & stormwater management performance audit final report

surface & stormwater management performance audit final report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Surface & Storm Water Management Performance Audit<br />

Kitsap County, Washington<br />

Final Report<br />

• Catch Basin Cleaning - R.W. Beck recommended that the Program conduct annual<br />

cleaning of all catch basins. The Program has actually cleaned more than 100% of its<br />

catch basins in each of the last two years (cleaning has been required for certain catch<br />

basins more frequently than once a year). Program personnel <strong>report</strong> that the costs<br />

associated with satisfying this recommendation has been less than the amount assumed<br />

by R.W. Beck.<br />

• Pollution Prevention Plans - R.W. Beck recommended that the SSWM Program develop<br />

Pollution Prevention Plans for County-owned facilities. These plans have been<br />

completed.<br />

• Street Sweeping - R.W. Beck recommended monthly sweeping of all curbed streets. This<br />

activity is the responsibility of the County Roads Department. During winter months, the<br />

current goal is to pick up sand within two weeks of its application. During the summer<br />

months, streets are swept on an as-needed basis. It is not expected that the Phase II<br />

Permit will require a change in the County’s current street sweeping frequency.<br />

• Facilities, Parks and Recreation Department Impacts - The Phase II Permit would<br />

require that maintenance of <strong>stormwater</strong> facilities in County parks also be performed in<br />

accordance with the pollution prevention minimum control measure requirements. This<br />

would be the responsibility of the County Facilities, Parks, and Recreation Department.<br />

SSWM Program personnel <strong>report</strong> that they have completed some work on behalf of the<br />

Facilities, Parks, and Recreation Department and other County departments, and as a<br />

result a somewhat better working relationship has developed.<br />

Observation: There are a number of SSWM program elements that are not required by the<br />

NPDES permit, but Kitsap County has other state requirements and its own requirements that it<br />

fulfills through its SSWM program.<br />

To determine what SSWM program elements are required versus those that are discretionary, the<br />

program elements were compared to the NPDES requirements. As noted in Chapter II, the<br />

Board of Commissioners established the SSWM Program for a broad number of purposes that<br />

are not solely related to the NPDES permit requirements. As a result, there are a number of<br />

SWWM program elements and certain tasks of other program elements that are not required by<br />

the draft NPDES Phase II Permit requirements (i.e., these program elements go beyond the<br />

minimum requirements of the Phase II Permit). Exhibit 10 shows the SSWM program elements<br />

by department/agency and shows what program elements are required and discretionary. A more<br />

detailed analysis is in Appendix B.<br />

Page 27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!