25.03.2014 Views

Star In the West TNR.pdf - The Hermetic Library

Star In the West TNR.pdf - The Hermetic Library

Star In the West TNR.pdf - The Hermetic Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that a certain system of irregularities in metre became admissible in <strong>the</strong><br />

formal court of poetry.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> Rossetti bro<strong>the</strong>rhood of painters returned to <strong>the</strong> stiff and simple<br />

elegance as displayed in <strong>the</strong> “Primavera” of Botticelli, so did Swinburne go<br />

back to <strong>the</strong> simple beauty of Greek tragedy as depicted in Euripides.*<br />

Crowley does <strong>the</strong> same, as we see in “<strong>The</strong> Tale of Archais,” also in “<strong>The</strong><br />

Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Tragedy” and “<strong>The</strong> Fatal Force”; but in <strong>the</strong>se two latter dramas<br />

with this important difference, that instead of applying Greek style to Greek<br />

scenery, he applies it to a totally different end, namely to <strong>the</strong> expression of<br />

modern surroundings, or to his own intrinsic ideas, as in <strong>the</strong> last-named play,<br />

which, even more so than in “<strong>The</strong> Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Tragedy” is, as we shall see later<br />

on, a subtle discount on present-day morality.<br />

*Ra<strong>the</strong>r than Sophocles or Aeschylus.<br />

What Beardsley and Whistler did for art, Crowley is now doing for poetry.<br />

Beardsley, especially, succeeded Rossetti just as Crowley is now<br />

superseding Swinburne. A poetic iconoclast to <strong>the</strong> very backbone, we find<br />

Crowley, especially in his later works, breaking away from every poetic<br />

convention and restraint. At first it makes itself apparent in “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Star</strong> and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Garter,” which was unwound from that same tangled skein from out of<br />

which Browning had ravelled “Fifine,” and <strong>the</strong>n, in <strong>the</strong> full power of<br />

manhood, in “Why Jesus Wept”; which one day will find its historic niche in<br />

<strong>the</strong> temple of Poetry, somewhere between <strong>the</strong> “Hudibras” of Butler and <strong>the</strong><br />

“Endymion” of Keats.<br />

Though Crowley, as can be clearly seen throughout his works, is not only a<br />

great admirer but also a disciple of Browning’s, he never<strong>the</strong>less vigorously<br />

attacks that great master’s cacophony and wilful obscurity of meaning, in<br />

that eccentric curiosity of diction “<strong>The</strong> Sword of Song,” in which our ears<br />

are assailed by <strong>the</strong> most monstrous diversity of noises, following in a rapid<br />

and dazzling succession till <strong>the</strong> ideas engendered in our brains are sporting<br />

in an outburst of mental leap-frog. <strong>The</strong> following are a few:<br />

“Fleas kill us” with “Aeschylus”<br />

“Trough hock lees” “ “Sophocles”<br />

“Globule us” “ “Aristobulus”*<br />

*<strong>The</strong> Sword of Song, vol. ii, p. 145.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!