Client Alert: 2012 OPDP Warning and Untitled Letters
Client Alert: 2012 OPDP Warning and Untitled Letters
Client Alert: 2012 OPDP Warning and Untitled Letters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
222<strong>2012</strong> <strong>OPDP</strong> <strong>Warning</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Untitled</strong> <strong>Letters</strong><br />
Date with<br />
Hyperlink Drug <strong>and</strong> Indications Referenced<br />
to Letter<br />
in Letter<br />
03-14-<strong>2012</strong> Avonex®<br />
For the treatment of patients with<br />
relapsing forms of multiple<br />
sclerosis to slow the accumulation<br />
of physical disability <strong>and</strong> decrease<br />
the frequency of clinical<br />
exacerbations.<br />
Boxed<br />
<strong>Warning</strong><br />
No<br />
Form of<br />
Communication<br />
Direct-to-<br />
Consumer<br />
Webpages<br />
Summary of Alleged Violations<br />
Overstatement of Efficacy:<br />
o Webpage implies that Avonex will enable 80% of patients with relapsing<br />
forms of multiple sclerosis to stay active <strong>and</strong> able for 10 years when<br />
clinical studies in the PI only support efficacy for up to 3 years. The openlabel<br />
follow-up study cited on the webpage is not substantial support.<br />
o Statement that FDA-approved labeling includes up to 3 years of clinical<br />
data does not mitigate the misleading impression.<br />
o Presentation implies that Avonex is effective for each of the individual<br />
functional areas of the Exp<strong>and</strong>ed Disability Status Scale (EDSS) listed on<br />
the webpage, but the study in the PI evaluated impact on total EDSS score,<br />
not each individual functional area.<br />
Omission of Material Information/Unsubstantiated Superiority<br />
Presentation:<br />
o Webpage implies that Avonex is superior to other multiple sclerosis drugs<br />
based on the selected attributes presented in the webpage that are<br />
consistent with the products’ PIs, but the page fails to present information<br />
about other attributes associated with the drugs, such as contraindications,<br />
serious warnings <strong>and</strong> precautions, <strong>and</strong> laboratory test monitoring.<br />
o Some safety information for Avonex is presented on the webpage, but<br />
inclusion of the information in small font at the bottom of the page does<br />
not mitigate the misleading impression.<br />
03-30-<strong>2012</strong> Firmagon®<br />
For treatment of patients with<br />
advanced prostate cancer.<br />
No iPad Sales Aid Unapproved New Use:<br />
o Aid suggests new intended uses for Firmagon as a neojuvant therapy<br />
before local treatment <strong>and</strong> as treatment for patients with a rising prostate<br />
specific antigen (PSA). Firmagon has a general indication for treatment of<br />
advanced prostate cancer, but it has not been approved or evaluated by<br />
FDA as a neojuvant therapy or as a treatment for rising PSA.<br />
Overstatement of Efficacy:<br />
o Claims suggest that the velocity of PSA reduction is clinically meaningful<br />
for patients with advanced prostate cancer, which is not supported by<br />
substantial evidence or experience.<br />
o Statement that PSA results should be interpreted with caution <strong>and</strong> that<br />
there is no evidence to show that rapidity of PSA decline is related to<br />
clinical benefit does not mitigate the misleading impression.<br />
o Claims suggest that the reduction in risk of PSA recurrence is clinically<br />
meaningful or associated with improved disease control or survival when<br />
this has not been demonstrated. Also, PSA levels were monitored as a<br />
secondary endpoint in the pivotal study <strong>and</strong> the referenced study was an<br />
6