28.03.2014 Views

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fact I believe two or three enemas a day and an exclusive fruit juice diet for a while<br />

would save the great majority <strong>of</strong> these cases.<br />

However, this is not meant to be a discussion <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> disease, which is<br />

covered in other books.<br />

That this change or mutation <strong>of</strong> germs is a very serious handicap in treating<br />

diseases by means <strong>of</strong> serums or vaccines is indicated all through the series <strong>of</strong> ten<br />

papers that Dr Rosenow published in Vol. 12 <strong>of</strong> the Mayo Clinic papers.<br />

He says in Vol. 12, page 920, that the serum used on some guinea pigs "tended to<br />

localize in the lungs".<br />

In Vol. 12, page 1001, he says:<br />

"Moreover, marked changes in the immunological condition as<br />

measured by agglutination tests have occurred in a number <strong>of</strong><br />

strains following successive (intratracheal) animal passages."<br />

He added that when the changes occurred, "no good effects were noted".<br />

If passage through animal tissue will cause "marked changes in the immunological<br />

condition", how can anyone know that passage through human tissues, for example<br />

from the arm into the body, will not do the same?<br />

And where can you find a serum or vaccine that has not had an animal passage at<br />

some previous time? <strong>The</strong>y are nearly all propagated in animals at present and a<br />

substantial percentage <strong>of</strong> all "passages" seem to cause a change. In table 4 he shows<br />

35 changes in 44 cases, and one <strong>of</strong> the other nine had changed in a previous<br />

experiment; that makes changes in over 81% <strong>of</strong> the tests!<br />

So you see, this change is no minor accident; in fact, it occurs with great frequency,<br />

as Bechamp proved many years ago.<br />

And these changes in the germs mentioned are <strong>of</strong> vital importance, as they <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

merely substitute a new disease for the one vaccinated against.<br />

<strong>Pasteur</strong> seemed to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> this point as he vehemently denied<br />

its possibility to the very last, and made bitter personal attacks on Bechamp and<br />

other colleagues who opposed his ideas for this reason.<br />

Now that this has been proven so overwhelmingly, we can see how a vaccine for any<br />

one disease could start some other disease through these mutation forms. We shall<br />

then need more serums for the new disease, or more likely, several new diseases<br />

may develop, and so on, ad infinitum.<br />

In the pamphlets Germ Mutation and Immunity, Artificial vs Natural, I give some<br />

important evidence indicating that the 1918 influenza epidemic was caused by<br />

mutation in vaccines used to 'prevent' typhoid in the armies in Europe.<br />

When they inoculated against typhoid, they soon found that they had a paratyphoid<br />

on their hands, and the percentage <strong>of</strong> paratyphoid in those inoculated was<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Dream</strong> & <strong>Lie</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>Pasteur</strong> R.B. Pearson 44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!