The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
fact I believe two or three enemas a day and an exclusive fruit juice diet for a while<br />
would save the great majority <strong>of</strong> these cases.<br />
However, this is not meant to be a discussion <strong>of</strong> the treatment <strong>of</strong> disease, which is<br />
covered in other books.<br />
That this change or mutation <strong>of</strong> germs is a very serious handicap in treating<br />
diseases by means <strong>of</strong> serums or vaccines is indicated all through the series <strong>of</strong> ten<br />
papers that Dr Rosenow published in Vol. 12 <strong>of</strong> the Mayo Clinic papers.<br />
He says in Vol. 12, page 920, that the serum used on some guinea pigs "tended to<br />
localize in the lungs".<br />
In Vol. 12, page 1001, he says:<br />
"Moreover, marked changes in the immunological condition as<br />
measured by agglutination tests have occurred in a number <strong>of</strong><br />
strains following successive (intratracheal) animal passages."<br />
He added that when the changes occurred, "no good effects were noted".<br />
If passage through animal tissue will cause "marked changes in the immunological<br />
condition", how can anyone know that passage through human tissues, for example<br />
from the arm into the body, will not do the same?<br />
And where can you find a serum or vaccine that has not had an animal passage at<br />
some previous time? <strong>The</strong>y are nearly all propagated in animals at present and a<br />
substantial percentage <strong>of</strong> all "passages" seem to cause a change. In table 4 he shows<br />
35 changes in 44 cases, and one <strong>of</strong> the other nine had changed in a previous<br />
experiment; that makes changes in over 81% <strong>of</strong> the tests!<br />
So you see, this change is no minor accident; in fact, it occurs with great frequency,<br />
as Bechamp proved many years ago.<br />
And these changes in the germs mentioned are <strong>of</strong> vital importance, as they <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
merely substitute a new disease for the one vaccinated against.<br />
<strong>Pasteur</strong> seemed to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> this point as he vehemently denied<br />
its possibility to the very last, and made bitter personal attacks on Bechamp and<br />
other colleagues who opposed his ideas for this reason.<br />
Now that this has been proven so overwhelmingly, we can see how a vaccine for any<br />
one disease could start some other disease through these mutation forms. We shall<br />
then need more serums for the new disease, or more likely, several new diseases<br />
may develop, and so on, ad infinitum.<br />
In the pamphlets Germ Mutation and Immunity, Artificial vs Natural, I give some<br />
important evidence indicating that the 1918 influenza epidemic was caused by<br />
mutation in vaccines used to 'prevent' typhoid in the armies in Europe.<br />
When they inoculated against typhoid, they soon found that they had a paratyphoid<br />
on their hands, and the percentage <strong>of</strong> paratyphoid in those inoculated was<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Dream</strong> & <strong>Lie</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Louis</strong> <strong>Pasteur</strong> R.B. Pearson 44