Advance Terminal Planning Study Program Criteria Document

More documents

Recommendations

Info

KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ADVANCE TERMINAL PLANNING STUDY PROGRAM CRITERIA DOCUMENT DRAFT Plan facilities that meet a minimum Level of Service (LOS) C during peak hours Plan for flexibility to expand as demand changes Develop facilities that can adapt to a rigorous and changing security environment Design passenger-friendly flows and way-finding Minimize walking distances Develop operationally efficient gates for the airlines Provide efficient baggage handling and delivery Improve international facilities and their connection to domestic service Minimize the complexity of construction phasing Airside Goals: Maximize the uses of the new terminal site and airfield efficiencies Plan facilities that meet or exceed FAA design standards Accommodate aircraft that utilize the Airport, both now and in the future Provide efficient operational requirements such as vehicle service roads and uncongested ramp areas Regional and Landside Access Goals: Financial: Integrate the New Terminal into the existing roadway and regional transportation system with minimal interruption to on-going operations DRAFT Maximize on-airport parking Provide for convenient passenger access and transfers Minimize walking distances to the New Terminal Provide a high LOS for rental car patrons Provide a high LOS at Arrivals and Departures curbsides Periodically evaluate a Rough Order of Magnitude to ensure the New Terminal is a financially feasible plan Develop a cost-effective and realistically affordable plan Utilize common-use systems to minimize capital and operating costs Maximize non-aviation revenue opportunities including concessions and parking Maximize eligibility for FAA funding of proposed improvements Landrum & Brown Page 3 April 2013
KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT ADVANCE TERMINAL PLANNING STUDY PROGRAM CRITERIA DOCUMENT DRAFT 1.2 Passenger Surveys Passenger surveys were conducted at the Airport between March 4 th and March 10 th , 2012 to gain an understanding of the passengers using KCI and develop a current passenger profile. The surveys confirmed KCI’s ASA and provided additional data such as check-in, baggage check, parking, and concessions planning, to name a few. All of the information collected from the surveys is beneficial and will be used in the future for demand forecasting, airport planning, and policy and investment decisions. The passenger surveys were conducted in the holdrooms at the gates prior to flight departure. Passengers were selected from a balanced mix of flights in all of the current terminals, and flights were selected by airlines, day of week, time of day, and destination market, providing a statistically valid method of identifying a representative passenger profile for departing passengers at KCI. Thirty questions including passenger characteristics, local trip origin, ground transportation mode and parking, concessions, resident or visitor status, purpose and propensity for travel, airline elite status, check-in location, number of bags carried on or checked, bag check location, travel group size, and final destination were included in the survey. Twenty-one hundred surveys were collected and analyzed. The survey results confirmed many facts and statistics that helped to describe current passengers at KCI. These results, summarized below, provide important information for the planning of the future New Terminal. DRAFT 80 percent travel from a local origin within the ASA 62 percent are considered residents and 38 percent are visitors 56 percent are male and 44 percent female The largest percentage were between 45 and 54 and the largest percentage of household income was between $50,000 and $99,999 93 percent had a final destination in the U.S and seven percent had an international final destination 56 percent were traveling for business and 42 percent were on leisure travel with more than half of leisure travelers visiting friends and family 85 percent came in a private car or rental car and 63 percent of those in a private car (excluding rental cars) used one of the on- or off-airport parking lots with 42 percent using the KCI economy lot Almost two-thirds were on non-stop flights The majority of destinations on connecting flights were to Chicago, Denver, and Dallas 42 percent used on-line check-in, 29 percent checked in with ticket agents, and 28 percent used E ticket kiosks Landrum & Brown Page 4 April 2013
Page 1 and 2: DRAFT
Page 3 and 4: KANSAS CITY NEW TERMINAL STUDY ADVA
Page 5: KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT A
Page 9 and 10: KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT A
Page 17 and 18: KANSAS CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT P
Page 57 and 58:
KANSAS CITY NEW TERMINAL STUDY ADVA
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
KANSAS CITY NEW TERMINAL STUDY PROG
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325:
DRAFT
show all

Advance Terminal Planning Study Program Criteria Document

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?